What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official 2022 World Cup Thread*** (2 Viewers)

This Poland teams looks and feels a lot like the Wales team. I assume they press more on offense in the second half?

I agree with Donovan - after the Saudi result you gotta try to win this game.

The last time in 1994 when the Saudis advanced in a group with Belgium, Holland and Morocco there was a 3-way today among the first 3 - all had 6 points (but that was the 24-team format so they all advanced). Could very well happen again.

-QG
Right. I think a draw here hurts both Poland and Mexico.
 
This Poland teams looks and feels a lot like the Wales team. I assume they press more on offense in the second half?

I agree with Donovan - after the Saudi result you gotta try to win this game.

The last time in 1994 when the Saudis advanced in a group with Belgium, Holland and Morocco there was a 3-way today among the first 3 - all had 6 points (but that was the 24-team format so they all advanced). Could very well happen again.

-QG
Nevah mind
-QG
 
Poland hurt a little more than Mexico based on how the schedule falls

Saudi Arabia can now clinch a spot in the knock out rounds with a win against Poland. And if that happens the winner of Mexico vs Argentina controls their own fate. A tie in that game would mean Mexico controls its own fate.

But Saudis very well could be 1st or 2nd to book their knock out spot (England can do so too with a win)

-QG
 
Sounds about right

=================================

Paul Carr
@PaulCarr


#USMNTnow has a 45% chance to advance, per ⁦@FiveThirtyEight⁩ projections. It was 53% pre-tournament. In six previous World Cups under this format, 52% of teams with exactly four points advanced.

Yet the market still says they are more likely to advance than not

I think these two things do not conflict.

The US has a 45% chance of advancing but that number is HIGHER than either Wales or Iran's chance at advancing (after the first game is complete for all 3 teams).

Well, it is higher than the other two, which is to be expected, but that it says USA advances 45% of the time implies they don't advance 55% of the time, and I can get even money on that compared to slightly odds on for them to make the last sixteen. The market has the projection effectively the other way around, can't do vig-free line calcs in my head but that line is implying USA qualify 53% maybe?

Edit - rounds up to 54%, close enough
 
Hoping Australia bring on Garang Kuol in the second half for a run. He joins Newcastle in January (though will likely get loaned out immediately somewhere in Europe). 18 year-old who still is raw but has some incredible highlights (albeit mostly in the crappy A-League).
 
The fox halftime show has been spectacularly bad. At the POL-MEX halftime, They showed one goal from the KSA-ARG game. That’s it. Nothing else. One of tHe biggest upsets in WC history. Aaaaannndd nothing.
 
Qatar builds 8 new stadiums for soccer. (Al Bayt Stadium, Ahmad Bin Ali Stadium, etc.

They run out of names and call the last one Stadium 974.
The number 974 has huge significance there.










Probably....

Not "huge", but the name is also not out of the blue either.

The stadium is a temporary stadium that was built using 974 shipping containers. The international dialing code for Qatar is also, conveniently, 974

It will be dismantled as soon as the WC is over.
 
They showed the replay of Germany's second goal a bunch of times right after, but didn't go back far enough to the long pass to midfield and the subsequent knockdown pass. I'm not a soccer expert by any stretch, but that knockdown/pass in stride looked absolutely brilliant to me and seemed to set up the rest of that attack.
 
They showed the replay of Germany's second goal a bunch of times right after, but didn't go back far enough to the long pass to midfield and the subsequent knockdown pass. I'm not a soccer expert by any stretch, but that knockdown/pass in stride looked absolutely brilliant to me and seemed to set up the rest of that attack.
So now I'm confused (I'm watching the game in Spanish and can't understand a word of it). Was the second goal disallowed for some reason? I saw it go in and I could have sworn I saw it get recorded on the score display on TV, but now I came back after some chores and see it's 1-0.
 
They showed the replay of Germany's second goal a bunch of times right after, but didn't go back far enough to the long pass to midfield and the subsequent knockdown pass. I'm not a soccer expert by any stretch, but that knockdown/pass in stride looked absolutely brilliant to me and seemed to set up the rest of that attack.
So now I'm confused (I'm watching the game in Spanish and can't understand a word of it). Was the second goal disallowed for some reason? I saw it go in and I could have sworn I saw it get recorded on the score display on TV, but now I came back after some chores and see it's 1-0.
Havertz was offsides. VAR reviewed it and ruled it out.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top