Cowboysfan8
Footballguy
YesLine of sightI don't understand. What was he obstructing?
YesLine of sightI don't understand. What was he obstructing?
Robo-umps can't arrive soon enough.Line of sightI don't understand. What was he obstructing?
Never seen that called for what the 3rd baseman did on the play.YesLine of sightI don't understand. What was he obstructing?
Nope me neitherNever seen that called for what the 3rd baseman did on the play.YesLine of sightI don't understand. What was he obstructing?
Did the ump have money on the game? What the hell.The way you explain it is, if the ball gets cut from the first baseman, you have to be there to make a play. And [third-base umpire Tripp Gibson] felt that I wasn't far enough away," Muncy said. "He felt that I was purposely doing it, and he felt that I made a conscious effort to stand in the way. Every third baseman in the league does that. Never seen it called, and it was actually called twice tonight."
Apparently the same ump made the same call against the Mets last night
By rule it could be the right call but everyone does it and it never gets called. In this case you can see Muncy purposely move in the line of site and he also got in the way of the umpires line of site so it made it obvious what he was doing.Did the ump have money on the game? What the hell.The way you explain it is, if the ball gets cut from the first baseman, you have to be there to make a play. And [third-base umpire Tripp Gibson] felt that I wasn't far enough away," Muncy said. "He felt that I was purposely doing it, and he felt that I made a conscious effort to stand in the way. Every third baseman in the league does that. Never seen it called, and it was actually called twice tonight."
Apparently the same ump made the same call against the Mets last night
It looks like it will replace Tom Seaver for Doug Flynn/Pat Zachary/Steve Henderson.The Javy Baez for PCA trade is one the Mets will regret for a very long time.
That didn't work out and Baltimore actually cut into their super high run diff of -92. Three other dwellers reside in the 70s (Pitt, Chisox, A's). Then it's another big drop to the low 50s, and there's only 3 in that tier before a 4th big gap.For those of you that do in-game betting, Baltimore is up 3-0 in the 6th. Hop on the Sox, boys!
Even more amazing is if they maintain their current pace they will finish with a record of 27-135.Sitting high atop of this heap however, are the Rockies, with a whopping -173 run differential. Amazing.
Even more amazing is if they maintain their current pace they will finish with a record of 27-135.Sitting high atop of this heap however, are the Rockies, with a whopping -173 run differential. Amazing.
the ump was misinterpreting the obstruction rule. obstruction is when a player impedes a baserunner's progress. line of sight is not a condition of the rule.Nope me neitherNever seen that called for what the 3rd baseman did on the play.YesLine of sightI don't understand. What was he obstructing?
I do not think this is true. I did not know that this was part of the rule, but saw a video of a former MLB player that referenced this.the ump was misinterpreting the obstruction rule. obstruction is when a player impedes a baserunner's progress. line of sight is not a condition of the rule.Nope me neitherNever seen that called for what the 3rd baseman did on the play.YesLine of sightI don't understand. What was he obstructing?
I read somewhere after this happened with Muncy that it is a rule but it’s never called but that was more than 10 minutes ago so I forget where it wasI do not think this is true. I did not know that this was part of the rule, but saw a video of a former MLB player that referenced this.the ump was misinterpreting the obstruction rule. obstruction is when a player impedes a baserunner's progress. line of sight is not a condition of the rule.Nope me neitherNever seen that called for what the 3rd baseman did on the play.YesLine of sightI don't understand. What was he obstructing?
Paul Skenes throwing a 4 hit shutout in the 7th cruising along with 2 outs. Of course they take him out. Pirates are one sorry *** organization. But most teams do that now so
Good pointPaul Skenes throwing a 4 hit shutout in the 7th cruising along with 2 outs. Of course they take him out. Pirates are one sorry *** organization. But most teams do that now so
How are they going to trade him if he's hurt?
They were up 8-0. no reason to risk injury.Paul Skenes throwing a 4 hit shutout in the 7th cruising along with 2 outs. Of course they take him out. Pirates are one sorry *** organization. But most teams do that now so
He is a true horse……but even my old school *** pulls him with an 8-0 lead.Paul Skenes throwing a 4 hit shutout in the 7th cruising along with 2 outs. Of course they take him out. Pirates are one sorry *** organization. But most teams do that now so
The Pirates aren't going to have him long term, so use him while you have him. They're not exactly awash in wins.They were up 8-0. no reason to risk injury.
The Pirates aren't going to have him long term, so use him while you have him. They're not exactly awash in wins.They were up 8-0. no reason to risk injury.
If it was a no-hitter or perfect game, sure. Keep him in. There was literally no reason for him to finish the game. Complete games aren't really a thing anymore.The Pirates aren't going to have him long term, so use him while you have him. They're not exactly awash in wins.They were up 8-0. no reason to risk injury.
The Pirates traded Cole away with two years of team control remaining. He was coming off of a mediocre season by his standards so his trade value wasn't as high as you'd assume today. He made the leap after being traded to Houston improving in virtually every pitching metric.
I don't think the idea of trading an arbitration eligible pitcher for prospects is inherently flawed but in retrospect, it was a bad trade for Pittsburgh because nobody really panned out for them.
Has any trade ever worked out for the Pirates? And by this, I mean trading away blossoming stars for prospects?
Brian Giles for Ricardo Rincon was an excellent trade.Has any trade ever worked out for the Pirates? And by this, I mean trading away blossoming stars for prospects?
I think that is slightly balanced out by the Giants getting Jason Schmidt from the Pirates for Armando Rios and Ryan Vogelsang.Getting Bryan Reynolds for one year of Cutch worked out better for the Bucs than for SF.
The best trade the Pirates ever made was when Pittsburgh acquired Honus Wagner, Fred Clarke and Rube Waddell from the Louisville Colonels in 1899 for Jack Chesboro and some nobodies.
The best trade the Pirates ever made was when Pittsburgh acquired Honus Wagner, Fred Clarke and Rube Waddell from the Louisville Colonels in 1899 for Jack Chesboro and some nobodies.
Forgot about that one. I remember the newspaper boy screaming about it by the livery and wondering what he was carrying on about.
Are the Pirates still paying Bobby Bonilla?
The Mets are. For like 10 more years I believeAre the Pirates still paying Bobby Bonilla?
60 day ILHuh. I wonder if this means Evan Phillips is gone for the year.
Right, but I'm wondering if they think he's not coming back. That vague "forearm/elbow" injury sure seems to turn into Tommy John surgery with some frequency.60 day ILHuh. I wonder if this means Evan Phillips is gone for the year.
Thanks. Now I remember. I always associate Bonilla with the Pirates. I can't even remember him playing for the Dodgers.Are the Pirates still paying Bobby Bonilla?
That's the Mets
Thanks. Now I remember. I always associate Bonilla with the Pirates. I can't even remember him playing for the Dodgers.Are the Pirates still paying Bobby Bonilla?
That's the Mets
Chesboro could play, man.The best trade the Pirates ever made was when Pittsburgh acquired Honus Wagner, Fred Clarke and Rube Waddell from the Louisville Colonels in 1899 for Jack Chesboro and some nobodies.
The Orioles are still paying him as well.Are the Pirates still paying Bobby Bonilla?
That's the Mets
Chandler Simpson gets sent to Triple A. He is hitting .285 with 19 SB's, 17 Runs and only 14K's in 123 AB's. He is not a power hitter but he brings a ton of other things to the table. I saw one outlet say much of the reason is that since he doesn't hit HR's he needs to play better defense to justify his spot in the lineup. So getting on base and in scoring position and scoring runs isn't valuable? This makes no sense.
I mean that is the transaction aspect but Simpson played well enough to keep his spot and be in the lineup. He brings something nobody else brings.Chandler Simpson gets sent to Triple A. He is hitting .285 with 19 SB's, 17 Runs and only 14K's in 123 AB's. He is not a power hitter but he brings a ton of other things to the table. I saw one outlet say much of the reason is that since he doesn't hit HR's he needs to play better defense to justify his spot in the lineup. So getting on base and in scoring position and scoring runs isn't valuable? This makes no sense.
Guessing this is because Jake Mangum is back and ready for action? Feels like if there's one team that understands the importance of getting on base and stealing bags it's the power-deficient Rays.
I mean that is the transaction aspect but Simpson played well enough to keep his spot and be in the lineup. He brings something nobody else brings.Chandler Simpson gets sent to Triple A. He is hitting .285 with 19 SB's, 17 Runs and only 14K's in 123 AB's. He is not a power hitter but he brings a ton of other things to the table. I saw one outlet say much of the reason is that since he doesn't hit HR's he needs to play better defense to justify his spot in the lineup. So getting on base and in scoring position and scoring runs isn't valuable? This makes no sense.
Guessing this is because Jake Mangum is back and ready for action? Feels like if there's one team that understands the importance of getting on base and stealing bags it's the power-deficient Rays.