Jeff Pasquino
Footballguy
The Baltimore team vs. the former Baltimore team.....
Enjoy.
Enjoy.
I doubt Ray gets a shot at Peyton tomorrow.Bart Scott, AD, Suggs, Price, and Reed will though.Ind 10Bal 31 Final2 Def TD'sLet's get this party started.Peyton is going to b*tch-slap Ray Ray all over the field.
Current update is mid 50s and 70% chance light rain.I'll update on the weather and such as kickoff nears.Expected to be cold and 50% chance of precip - but not snow.
If you're just kidding or this is just trash talk, then no problem. But if you're serious, then you're mistaken and have no respect for or understanding of NFL history. IMO, Unitas is one of the 5 best QBs of all time. I challenge you to refute that assertion, or to argue that Manning is one of the 5 best QBs of all time.Maybe Manning will approach Unitas' legacy if he continues playing at his current level for another 8-10 years and wins a couple SuperBowls, but right now he's not qualified to hold JohnnyU's jock (plus he has demonstrated a strong tendency to choke in big games -- Unitas was always at his best in big games).If Unitas were alive and in his prime today, he'd be a great back-up quarterback for the INDIANAPOLIS COLTS.
Ok, on to trash-talkin'I think it will be an extremely close game. The Ravens are favored by 4 because of home field advantage and because they have the best defense in the AFC. However, they will likely struggle to put points on the board and may need to rely on one or more defensive TDs for enough points to outscore Indy -- always a risky situation.Indy has several obstacles to overcome, IMO. These include:1. Not playing at home or in a dome - Indy always plays significantly better at home, plus the weather may be wet and definitely worse for Indy than playing in a dome controlled environment.2. Crowd noise - I predict the crowd noise will exceed 102 db and set a new record (including domes) before the game, and it will continue at that level whenever Indy has the ball.3. The "Curse of Irsay" - explained in above post, Indy will need to overcome a lot of bad karma.But Indy's biggest obstacle, IMO, is Manning. In big games, the great QBs (Montana, Unitas, etc.) always rose to the occasion and played their best football in the biggest games -- the ultimate field generals. To date, Manning has wilted in big games. First he gets this blank-stare look like he's in a dream. Then when the game gets down to the brass tacks, he gets nervous and makes bad decisions and doesn't come through with big game-winning plays. When it's obvious the game has been lost, he gets this expression on his face like he's going to cry -- like he wants to run to his Mommy and Daddy and have them console him. Unless he rises to the occasion in this game, Indy will lose.Go Ravens!Let's get this party started.Peyton is going to b*tch-slap Ray Ray all over the field.
No dog in the fight, but here's Peyton Manning's post-season stats:Year Opp Result | CMP ATT PYD PTD INT | RSH YD TDBut Indy's biggest obstacle, IMO, is Manning. In big games, the great QBs (Montana, Unitas, etc.) always rose to the occasion and played their best football in the biggest games -- the ultimate field generals. To date, Manning has wilted in big games. First he gets this blank-stare look like he's in a dream. Then when the game gets down to the brass tacks, he gets nervous and makes bad decisions and doesn't come through with big game-winning plays. When it's obvious the game has been lost, he gets this expression on his face like he's going to cry -- like he wants to run to his Mommy and Daddy and have them console him. Unless he rises to the occasion in this game, Indy will lose.
Go Ravens!
I don't know what you are talking about to be honest with you. The only playoff games that Peyton Manning has played well in was the 3 wild card games at home and the second round game against the Chiefs in 2003. As the stakes increase he folds and that's hard to argue.If you look at the teams playoff losses Peyton usually had either his worst game of the year or at best arguably one of his top 2-3 worst games of the year. And the big thing here is everyone blames the Colts D but the truth is the Colts have not lost one singlee offensive shootout under Manning but instead have put up 16, 17, 0, 14, 3 and 18 points in the losses. That's 11.33 points per game. And stats don't tell the whole story. His stats against the Steelers last year while not great were not horrible. But he failed to move the team and worse he melted down at the end and failed to advance the team into the end zone or set up a shorter attempt for Vanderjagt.[
No dog in the fight, but here's Peyton Manning's post-season stats:
Year Opp Result | CMP ATT PYD PTD INT | RSH YD TD
---------------------+--------------------------+-----------------
1999 ten L,16-19 | 19 43 227 0 0 | 2 22 1
2000 mia L,17-23 | 17 32 194 1 0 | 1 -2 0
2002 nyj L,0-41 | 14 31 137 0 2 | 1 2 0
2003 den W,41-10 | 22 26 377 5 0 | 1 0 0
2003 kan W,38-31 | 22 30 304 3 0 | 1 -1 0
2003 nwe L,14-24 | 23 47 237 1 4| 2 4 0
2004 den W,49-24 | 27 33 457 4 1 | 1 1 1
2004 nwe L,3-20 | 27 42 238 0 1 | 1 6 0
2005 pit L,18-21 | 22 38 290 1 0 | 0 0 0
2006 kan W,23-8 | 30 38 268 1 3| 2 -2 0
---------------------+--------------------------+-----------------
TOTAL | 223 360 2729 16 11 | 12 30 2
However, if you're making the case that he's going to put up a bad statistical game, the stats beg to differ. .
Right now 63 degrees and slight chance of rain (about 20 to 30%).Go Ravens!!!!!This game will be over by half time. Let Colt fans not forget how HORRIBLE the colts were on D this whole year. One game against KC is not a trend, its a fluke.Everyone is talking about how the colts are going to move the ball against the ravens but the game will be decided on how the ravens will be able to move the ball at will against the colts.I'll update on the weather and such as kickoff nears.Expected to be cold and 50% chance of precip - but not snow.
I would take Tom Brady over Manning any day of the week, as would about 99% of NFL Analysts who know the game. He's big in big games and is ALWAYS cool when the pressures on.Ok, on to trash-talkin'I think it will be an extremely close game. The Ravens are favored by 4 because of home field advantage and because they have the best defense in the AFC. However, they will likely struggle to put points on the board and may need to rely on one or more defensive TDs for enough points to outscore Indy -- always a risky situation.Indy has several obstacles to overcome, IMO. These include:1. Not playing at home or in a dome - Indy always plays significantly better at home, plus the weather may be wet and definitely worse for Indy than playing in a dome controlled environment.2. Crowd noise - I predict the crowd noise will exceed 102 db and set a new record (including domes) before the game, and it will continue at that level whenever Indy has the ball.3. The "Curse of Irsay" - explained in above post, Indy will need to overcome a lot of bad karma.But Indy's biggest obstacle, IMO, is Manning. In big games, the great QBs (Montana, Unitas, etc.) always rose to the occasion and played their best football in the biggest games -- the ultimate field generals. To date, Manning has wilted in big games. First he gets this blank-stare look like he's in a dream. Then when the game gets down to the brass tacks, he gets nervous and makes bad decisions and doesn't come through with big game-winning plays. When it's obvious the game has been lost, he gets this expression on his face like he's going to cry -- like he wants to run to his Mommy and Daddy and have them console him. Unless he rises to the occasion in this game, Indy will lose.Go Ravens!Let's get this party started.Peyton is going to b*tch-slap Ray Ray all over the field.
I doubt Ray gets a shot at Peyton tomorrow.Bart Scott, AD, Suggs, Price, and Reed will though.Let's get this party started.
Peyton is going to b*tch-slap Ray Ray all over the field.
Ind 10
Bal 31 Final
2 Def TD's
My point was this: If you're making the argument that he doesn't lead the Colts as well in the playoffs as in the regular season (defined as wins and losses), I would be open to that argument and would agree with you that as the stakes get higher he tightens up. To further the point, I would extend someone else's post and say that if he wins today (and I don't think he does), that would qualify as a "signature playoff win", particularly if he goes for 300+ yards with about 3 TDs and no picks against a VERY GOOD Ravens defense.On the other hand, if he's saying that he doesn't put up good stats in the playoffs, I would disagree with that. That's all.I don't know what you are talking about to be honest with you. The only playoff games that Peyton Manning has played well in was the 3 wild card games at home and the second round game against the Chiefs in 2003. As the stakes increase he folds and that's hard to argue.If you look at the teams playoff losses Peyton usually had either his worst game of the year or at best arguably one of his top 2-3 worst games of the year. And the big thing here is everyone blames the Colts D but the truth is the Colts have not lost one singlee offensive shootout under Manning but instead have put up 16, 17, 0, 14, 3 and 18 points in the losses. That's 11.33 points per game. And stats don't tell the whole story. His stats against the Steelers last year while not great were not horrible. But he failed to move the team and worse he melted down at the end and failed to advance the team into the end zone or set up a shorter attempt for Vanderjagt.[
No dog in the fight, but here's Peyton Manning's post-season stats:
Year Opp Result | CMP ATT PYD PTD INT | RSH YD TD
---------------------+--------------------------+-----------------
1999 ten L,16-19 | 19 43 227 0 0 | 2 22 1
2000 mia L,17-23 | 17 32 194 1 0 | 1 -2 0
2002 nyj L,0-41 | 14 31 137 0 2 | 1 2 0
2003 den W,41-10 | 22 26 377 5 0 | 1 0 0
2003 kan W,38-31 | 22 30 304 3 0 | 1 -1 0
2003 nwe L,14-24 | 23 47 237 1 4| 2 4 0
2004 den W,49-24 | 27 33 457 4 1 | 1 1 1
2004 nwe L,3-20 | 27 42 238 0 1 | 1 6 0
2005 pit L,18-21 | 22 38 290 1 0 | 0 0 0
2006 kan W,23-8 | 30 38 268 1 3| 2 -2 0
---------------------+--------------------------+-----------------
TOTAL | 223 360 2729 16 11 | 12 30 2
However, if you're making the case that he's going to put up a bad statistical game, the stats beg to differ. .
wind is the keyI'll update on the weather and such as kickoff nears.Expected to be cold and 50% chance of precip - but not snow.
It is 66 right now, hardly cold at all with 6 mile an hour wind. It should be raining lightly. Manning may have caught a break?I'll update on the weather and such as kickoff nears.Expected to be cold and 50% chance of precip - but not snow.
I agree with Tom and I am not an Indy fan.My point was this: If you're making the argument that he doesn't lead the Colts as well in the playoffs as in the regular season (defined as wins and losses), I would be open to that argument and would agree with you that as the stakes get higher he tightens up. To further the point, I would extend someone else's post and say that if he wins today (and I don't think he does), that would qualify as a "signature playoff win", particularly if he goes for 300+ yards with about 3 TDs and no picks against a VERY GOOD Ravens defense.On the other hand, if he's saying that he doesn't put up good stats in the playoffs, I would disagree with that. That's all.I don't know what you are talking about to be honest with you. The only playoff games that Peyton Manning has played well in was the 3 wild card games at home and the second round game against the Chiefs in 2003. As the stakes increase he folds and that's hard to argue.If you look at the teams playoff losses Peyton usually had either his worst game of the year or at best arguably one of his top 2-3 worst games of the year. And the big thing here is everyone blames the Colts D but the truth is the Colts have not lost one singlee offensive shootout under Manning but instead have put up 16, 17, 0, 14, 3 and 18 points in the losses. That's 11.33 points per game. And stats don't tell the whole story. His stats against the Steelers last year while not great were not horrible. But he failed to move the team and worse he melted down at the end and failed to advance the team into the end zone or set up a shorter attempt for Vanderjagt.[
No dog in the fight, but here's Peyton Manning's post-season stats:
Year Opp Result | CMP ATT PYD PTD INT | RSH YD TD
---------------------+--------------------------+-----------------
1999 ten L,16-19 | 19 43 227 0 0 | 2 22 1
2000 mia L,17-23 | 17 32 194 1 0 | 1 -2 0
2002 nyj L,0-41 | 14 31 137 0 2 | 1 2 0
2003 den W,41-10 | 22 26 377 5 0 | 1 0 0
2003 kan W,38-31 | 22 30 304 3 0 | 1 -1 0
2003 nwe L,14-24 | 23 47 237 1 4| 2 4 0
2004 den W,49-24 | 27 33 457 4 1 | 1 1 1
2004 nwe L,3-20 | 27 42 238 0 1 | 1 6 0
2005 pit L,18-21 | 22 38 290 1 0 | 0 0 0
2006 kan W,23-8 | 30 38 268 1 3| 2 -2 0
---------------------+--------------------------+-----------------
TOTAL | 223 360 2729 16 11 | 12 30 2
However, if you're making the case that he's going to put up a bad statistical game, the stats beg to differ. .![]()
I disagree.I would take Tom Brady over Manning any day of the week, as would about 99% of NFL Analysts who know the game. He's big in big games and is ALWAYS cool when the pressures on.
Do you think this supports your argument? If you just swapped Manning and Brady, I am sure that Manning would have more rings than Brady. Last week was the FIRST game where Manning was not real good where they won and you could argue that Manning was pretty good completing 31-25 passes that were not picked off (and 2 of the picks appeared to be the receivers fault.
Also, 99% of the analysts do not think Brady is better than Manning; this is![]()
Just got back! Have you ever watched Peyton on the sidelines in the 1st half of playoff games? What I've observed is no passion and a blank-stare look. Maybe it will be different today.Although I'm a Ravens fan, part of me is almost pulling for him to rise to the occasion and play a great game today. I would characterize his postseason experience to date as: "He chokes in big games." Sorry but that's how I see it.No dog in the fight, but here's Peyton Manning's post-season stats:Year Opp Result | CMP ATT PYD PTD INT | RSH YD TDBut Indy's biggest obstacle, IMO, is Manning. In big games, the great QBs (Montana, Unitas, etc.) always rose to the occasion and played their best football in the biggest games -- the ultimate field generals. To date, Manning has wilted in big games. First he gets this blank-stare look like he's in a dream. Then when the game gets down to the brass tacks, he gets nervous and makes bad decisions and doesn't come through with big game-winning plays. When it's obvious the game has been lost, he gets this expression on his face like he's going to cry -- like he wants to run to his Mommy and Daddy and have them console him. Unless he rises to the occasion in this game, Indy will lose.
Go Ravens!
---------------------+--------------------------+-----------------
1999 ten L,16-19 | 19 43 227 0 0 | 2 22 1
2000 mia L,17-23 | 17 32 194 1 0 | 1 -2 0
2002 nyj L,0-41 | 14 31 137 0 2 | 1 2 0
2003 den W,41-10 | 22 26 377 5 0 | 1 0 0
2003 kan W,38-31 | 22 30 304 3 0 | 1 -1 0
2003 nwe L,14-24 | 23 47 237 1 4| 2 4 0
2004 den W,49-24 | 27 33 457 4 1 | 1 1 1
2004 nwe L,3-20 | 27 42 238 0 1 | 1 6 0
2005 pit L,18-21 | 22 38 290 1 0 | 0 0 0
2006 kan W,23-8 | 30 38 268 1 3| 2 -2 0
---------------------+--------------------------+-----------------
TOTAL | 223 360 2729 16 11 | 12 30 2
If you want to talk about team leadership, then I might listen. A 4-6 playoff record would lend credence to that argument. I would say that the losses in '99 to Tennessee, '03 and '04 to New England and in '05 to Pittsburgh were all to the eventual AFC champions.
However, if you're making the case that he's going to put up a bad statistical game, the stats beg to differ. PM has only two 2+ interception games (bolded above and one of which was last week and two of those were by old nemesis Ty Law). Plus, with the exception of the two bolded game lines above, he's thrown for at least 225 yards.
I can see Manning having a great game or just sucking out loud. I'm not a Manning apologist or fan, I'm only saying you might want to back up your "blank-stare look" statement with some facts.
Winds are calm.wind is the keyI'll update on the weather and such as kickoff nears.Expected to be cold and 50% chance of precip - but not snow.
It is overcast and warm, over 60, and the only rain has been light drizzle. I seriously doubt wind or rain will have any impact in this game.I've been driving around a bit today and to a few places / stores / gas stations, and let me tell you that there is a playoff atmosphere surrounding this area. Not just Baltimore, but anywhere within the greater Baltimore area. Flags, jerseys, purple everywhere. Radio, TV - it's inescapable. Mind you I'm not a Ravens fan, but if you don't feel the electricity in the area today, you just don't feel.It is 66 right now, hardly cold at all with 6 mile an hour wind. It should be raining lightly. Manning may have caught a break?I'll update on the weather and such as kickoff nears.Expected to be cold and 50% chance of precip - but not snow.
I do as well.The years that Brady won his superbowls he did so with less of an offense then the Colts and Less of a defense. Everyone wants to believe that the Pats had this great D which is the reason why he won but the fact is during his last superbowl run the Colts actually had a better D statistically, and a better offense. But Colt fans always seem to find an excuse for their golden boy. Facts are he has not performed well under pressure. He can put up all the poins he wants in the regular season but come playoffs I would much rather have a QB like Brady who has won.I disagree.I would take Tom Brady over Manning any day of the week, as would about 99% of NFL Analysts who know the game. He's big in big games and is ALWAYS cool when the pressures on.
Do you think this supports your argument? If you just swapped Manning and Brady, I am sure that Manning would have more rings than Brady. Last week was the FIRST game where Manning was not real good where they won and you could argue that Manning was pretty good completing 31-25 passes that were not picked off (and 2 of the picks appeared to be the receivers fault.
Also, 99% of the analysts do not think Brady is better than Manning; this is![]()
North, I agree with you totally. Brady and Montana and Unitas are/were incredibly similar, IMO -- icewater in their veins during the 4th quarter of the biggest games. Not being phased or flustered when the other team went ahead with only a couple minutes left. Rallying their team -- not rah-rah stuff -- but in the huddle, looking into each player's eyes -- and the other players "knowing" that Brady (or Montana or Unitas) would lead them to win the game.Of the 3, I think Brady has the potential to post the best postseason record. I think Montana was probably the most "efficient" in terms of producing when the chips were down. But I loved watching Unitas during the last 2 minutes of big games. He seemed to relish the experience and it almost seemed like he milked it for every ounce of suspense and drama before he won the game in the final seconds. Not that he did it on purpose, but he had the supreme confidence to work the clock, march down the field, and score the winning points.I would take Tom Brady over Manning any day of the week, as would about 99% of NFL Analysts who know the game. He's big in big games and is ALWAYS cool when the pressures on.Ok, on to trash-talkin'I think it will be an extremely close game. The Ravens are favored by 4 because of home field advantage and because they have the best defense in the AFC. However, they will likely struggle to put points on the board and may need to rely on one or more defensive TDs for enough points to outscore Indy -- always a risky situation.Indy has several obstacles to overcome, IMO. These include:1. Not playing at home or in a dome - Indy always plays significantly better at home, plus the weather may be wet and definitely worse for Indy than playing in a dome controlled environment.2. Crowd noise - I predict the crowd noise will exceed 102 db and set a new record (including domes) before the game, and it will continue at that level whenever Indy has the ball.3. The "Curse of Irsay" - explained in above post, Indy will need to overcome a lot of bad karma.But Indy's biggest obstacle, IMO, is Manning. In big games, the great QBs (Montana, Unitas, etc.) always rose to the occasion and played their best football in the biggest games -- the ultimate field generals. To date, Manning has wilted in big games. First he gets this blank-stare look like he's in a dream. Then when the game gets down to the brass tacks, he gets nervous and makes bad decisions and doesn't come through with big game-winning plays. When it's obvious the game has been lost, he gets this expression on his face like he's going to cry -- like he wants to run to his Mommy and Daddy and have them console him. Unless he rises to the occasion in this game, Indy will lose.Go Ravens!Let's get this party started.Peyton is going to b*tch-slap Ray Ray all over the field.
They asked Johnny U after that '58 game if he was worried about a turnover passing the ball as the Colts were driving at the end. His response?"When you know what you are doing, you don't make mistakes"edited for clarityNorth, I agree with you totally. Brady and Montana and Unitas are/were incredibly similar, IMO -- icewater in their veins during the 4th quarter of the biggest games. Not being phased or flustered when the other team went ahead with only a couple minutes left. Rallying their team -- not rah-rah stuff -- but in the huddle, looking into each player's eyes -- and the other players "knowing" that Brady (or Montana or Unitas) would lead them to win the game.Of the 3, I think Brady has the potential to post the best postseason record. I think Montana was probably the most "efficient" in terms of producing when the chips were down. But I loved watching Unitas during the last 2 minutes of big games. He seemed to relish the experience and it almost seemed like he milked it for every ounce of suspense and drama before he won the game in the final seconds. Not that he did it on purpose, but he had the supreme confidence to work the clock, march down the field, and score the winning points.I would take Tom Brady over Manning any day of the week, as would about 99% of NFL Analysts who know the game. He's big in big games and is ALWAYS cool when the pressures on.Ok, on to trash-talkin'I think it will be an extremely close game. The Ravens are favored by 4 because of home field advantage and because they have the best defense in the AFC. However, they will likely struggle to put points on the board and may need to rely on one or more defensive TDs for enough points to outscore Indy -- always a risky situation.Indy has several obstacles to overcome, IMO. These include:1. Not playing at home or in a dome - Indy always plays significantly better at home, plus the weather may be wet and definitely worse for Indy than playing in a dome controlled environment.2. Crowd noise - I predict the crowd noise will exceed 102 db and set a new record (including domes) before the game, and it will continue at that level whenever Indy has the ball.3. The "Curse of Irsay" - explained in above post, Indy will need to overcome a lot of bad karma.But Indy's biggest obstacle, IMO, is Manning. In big games, the great QBs (Montana, Unitas, etc.) always rose to the occasion and played their best football in the biggest games -- the ultimate field generals. To date, Manning has wilted in big games. First he gets this blank-stare look like he's in a dream. Then when the game gets down to the brass tacks, he gets nervous and makes bad decisions and doesn't come through with big game-winning plays. When it's obvious the game has been lost, he gets this expression on his face like he's going to cry -- like he wants to run to his Mommy and Daddy and have them console him. Unless he rises to the occasion in this game, Indy will lose.Go Ravens!Let's get this party started.Peyton is going to b*tch-slap Ray Ray all over the field.
Man, I hope you're right. My gut is telling me that it'll be a really close hard-fought game. If Johnny U is looking down and has any influence, the Colts will score and go ahead at the 2-minute warning. And then McNair will lead the Ravens on an 80-yard drive to win the game as time expires.One thing for sure -- there's going to be a whole lot of folks in Baltimore who won't be able to speak tomorrow.The Ravens will win this game handily.The defense for Baltimore will be swarming all over the field, and the front 4 will have pressure. AD will take away the TE, and the DBs will only have to cover Wayne and Harrison for 3-4 seconds.The more intriguing matchup will be the Baltimore offense and how many points they can generate. Will Jamal Lewis revert back to his younger days and pull out a 100-yard game? I think the Ravens rely on McNair with Heap, Mason and Clayton leading the way. Don't rule out a deep one to Demetrius Williams either.Matt Stover is way underrated.I think Peyton can get the Colts in the end zone, but it won't change the outcome.Baltimore 27-13.
Having no preference for either team. Slightly favoring Dungy because he really is one of the good guys, but no strong attachment. I just couldn't get excited for this game.Then I read this thread.One thing for sure -- there's going to be a whole lot of folks in Baltimore who won't be able to speak tomorrow.
Yeah, that really shows his mindset. When you hear interviews with offensive players on the Patriots, you get the same response when they are asked about Brady in the 4th quarter when a big game is on the line. And those comments are eerily similar to what 49ers players said about Montana and what Colts players said about Unitas. These tough smashmouth players who are in awe of their leader/QB and would follow them into fire.They asked Johnny U after that '58 game if he was worried about a turnover passing the ball as the Colts were driving at the end. His response?"When you know what you are doing, you don't make mistakes"edited for clarityNorth, I agree with you totally. Brady and Montana and Unitas are/were incredibly similar, IMO -- icewater in their veins during the 4th quarter of the biggest games. Not being phased or flustered when the other team went ahead with only a couple minutes left. Rallying their team -- not rah-rah stuff -- but in the huddle, looking into each player's eyes -- and the other players "knowing" that Brady (or Montana or Unitas) would lead them to win the game.Of the 3, I think Brady has the potential to post the best postseason record. I think Montana was probably the most "efficient" in terms of producing when the chips were down. But I loved watching Unitas during the last 2 minutes of big games. He seemed to relish the experience and it almost seemed like he milked it for every ounce of suspense and drama before he won the game in the final seconds. Not that he did it on purpose, but he had the supreme confidence to work the clock, march down the field, and score the winning points.I would take Tom Brady over Manning any day of the week, as would about 99% of NFL Analysts who know the game. He's big in big games and is ALWAYS cool when the pressures on.Ok, on to trash-talkin'I think it will be an extremely close game. The Ravens are favored by 4 because of home field advantage and because they have the best defense in the AFC. However, they will likely struggle to put points on the board and may need to rely on one or more defensive TDs for enough points to outscore Indy -- always a risky situation.Indy has several obstacles to overcome, IMO. These include:1. Not playing at home or in a dome - Indy always plays significantly better at home, plus the weather may be wet and definitely worse for Indy than playing in a dome controlled environment.2. Crowd noise - I predict the crowd noise will exceed 102 db and set a new record (including domes) before the game, and it will continue at that level whenever Indy has the ball.3. The "Curse of Irsay" - explained in above post, Indy will need to overcome a lot of bad karma.But Indy's biggest obstacle, IMO, is Manning. In big games, the great QBs (Montana, Unitas, etc.) always rose to the occasion and played their best football in the biggest games -- the ultimate field generals. To date, Manning has wilted in big games. First he gets this blank-stare look like he's in a dream. Then when the game gets down to the brass tacks, he gets nervous and makes bad decisions and doesn't come through with big game-winning plays. When it's obvious the game has been lost, he gets this expression on his face like he's going to cry -- like he wants to run to his Mommy and Daddy and have them console him. Unless he rises to the occasion in this game, Indy will lose.Go Ravens!Let's get this party started.Peyton is going to b*tch-slap Ray Ray all over the field.
Man, you can root for whoever you want to. I know Ravens fans respect Indy Colts fans. Whatever the lingering feelings are about the "move in the middle of the night", I don't have any bad feelings for Colts fans or Colts players.That being said, I'll be screaming my head off and hoping like hell that the Ravens win. One aspect of it is paying respect to JohnnyU and the other Baltimore Colts players who were icons in this city. Part of it is "payback" for what happened 23 years ago. And part of it is just a damn good football game.Having no preference for either team. Slightly favoring Dungy because he really is one of the good guys, but no strong attachment. I just couldn't get excited for this game.Then I read this thread.One thing for sure -- there's going to be a whole lot of folks in Baltimore who won't be able to speak tomorrow.
![]()
![]()
![]()
LET"S GET IT ON! Go Colts!!!!?
I disagree.I would take Tom Brady over Manning any day of the week, as would about 99% of NFL Analysts who know the game. He's big in big games and is ALWAYS cool when the pressures on.
Do you think this supports your argument? If you just swapped Manning and Brady, I am sure that Manning would have more rings than Brady. Last week was the FIRST game where Manning was not real good where they won and you could argue that Manning was pretty good completing 31-25 passes that were not picked off (and 2 of the picks appeared to be the receivers fault.
Also, 99% of the analysts do not think Brady is better than Manning; this is![]()
playing what?anyone know if bob sanders is playing? thanks