What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** Official Barack Obama FBG campaign headquarters *** (3 Viewers)

A great Obama speech going down in Indiana today.

No negativity (some criticism of McCain on issues but no character attacks), all policy.

This Obama guy is good - really good.

Remarks of Senator Barack Obama—as prepared for delivery

Indianapolis, Indiana

Wednesday, October 08, 2008

We meet today at a moment of great uncertainty for America. Yesterday, we saw another significant drop in the stock market as the anxiety about this financial crisis grew worse. Overnight, the same thing happened with markets around the world. And this morning, the Federal Reserve took swift action together with other nations to stem what is now a full-blown global financial crisis. I support that action, as I’ve said before that this is a global problem and it needs to be solved through a global effort. I hope this global response continues as leaders of major financial institutions and representatives from nations around the world gather in Washington soon.

We are facing a very serious challenge, and all of us – all of us – have a stake in its solution. Because the credit markets are frozen right now, there’s a ripple effect throughout our economy. Businesses large and small are finding it impossible to get loans, which means they can’t buy new equipment or make payroll. Auto plants that have been around for decades are closing their doors and laying off workers who’ve never known another job in their entire life. And we have already lost three-quarters of a million jobs just this year.

Here in Indianapolis and all across America, you’re seeing your hours get cut or realizing that you can’t pay every bill that’s sitting on the kitchen counter. It’s harder to make the mortgage or fill up your gas tank and some people don’t even know whether they’ll be able to keep the electricity on at the end of the month. The money you’ve been putting away for your retirement or your kids’ college education is disappearing faster than you can count. The dream that so many generations have fought for feels like it’s slowly slipping away.

But I’m here today to tell you that there are better days ahead. I know these are tough times. I know that many of you are anxious about the future. But this isn’t a time for fear or panic. This is a time for resolve and leadership. I know that we can steer ourselves out of this crisis. Because that’s who we are. Because this is the United States of America. This is a nation that has faced down war and depression; great challenges and great threats. And at each and every moment, we have risen to meet these challenges – not as Democrats, not as Republicans, but as Americans. With resolve. With confidence. With that fundamental belief that here in America, our destiny is not written for us, but by us. That’s who we are, and that’s the country we need to be right now.

America still has the most talented, most productive workers of any country on Earth who work two jobs or three jobs and take the last bus home at night because they want something more for their children. We’re still the home to innovation and technology, colleges and universities that are the envy of the world. Some of the biggest ideas in history have come from our small businesses and our research facilities. It won’t be easy, but there’s no reason we can’t steer ourselves out of this crisis and make this century another American century. Of course we can.

But I also know this. It will take a new direction. It will take new leadership in Washington. It will take a real change in the policies and politics of the last eight years.

And that’s why the decision you make in twenty-seven days is so important. That’s why this is no ordinary election – because this is no ordinary moment for America.

In last night’s debate, John McCain and I each had the chance to make the case for change – to talk about what we would do differently from the last eight years when it comes to lifting our middle-class, growing our economy, and restoring our prosperity. But all we heard from Senator McCain was more of the same Bush economics that led us to this point.

Take health care. We were both asked whether we believed that health care should finally be the right of every American. I believe it should. But Senator McCain didn’t say that. And when you look at his radical health care plan, you can see why.

He talks about giving every family a $5,000 credit to buy health care, but he didn’t mention last night that he’ll also tax your benefits for the first time in history. It’s an old Washington bait and switch. He gives you a tax credit with one hand, but raises your taxes with the other. And he didn’t mention that the average health care plan costs $12,000 in the first place.

Senator McCain didn’t tell us about the studies that say his plan would cause 20 million Americans to lose their health insurance, or how the Chamber of Commerce said it would be a disaster for businesses, or how it would de-regulate the insurance industry so that they don’t have to cover things like mammograms, or vaccinations, or maternity care. He thinks we won’t notice these things.

Well, I’ve got news for John McCain: we notice, we know better, and we’re not going to let him get away with it.

This issue is personal for me. My mother died of ovarian cancer at the age of 53, and I’ll never forget how she spent the final months of her life lying in a hospital bed, fighting with her insurance company because they claimed that her cancer was a pre-existing condition and didn’t want to pay for treatment. If I am President, I will make sure those insurance companies can never do that again.

My health care plan will ensure that insurance companies can’t discriminate against those who are sick and need care most. If you have health insurance, the only thing that will change under my plan is the amount you pay in premiums. That will be less. And if you don’t have health insurance, you’ll be able to get the same kind of health insurance that Members of Congress get for themselves. We’ll invest in preventative care and new technology to finally lower the cost of health care for families, businesses, and the entire economy. That’s the change we need, and that’s the choice you face in this election.

Even as so many Americans are worried about their medical bills or keeping their jobs or staying in their homes, Senator McCain’s campaign announced last week that they plan to “turn the page” on the discussion about our economy and spend the final weeks of this election attacking me instead. His campaign actually said, and I quote, “if we keep talking about the economy, we’re going to lose.”

Well I’ve got news for John McCain. This isn’t about losing a campaign – this is about Americans who are losing their jobs, and their homes, and their life savings. I can take four more weeks of John McCain’s attacks, but America can’t take four more years of John McCain’s George Bush policies. We can’t afford four more years of the economic theory that says we should give more and more to those with the most and hope that prosperity trickles down to everyone else. We can’t afford more four years of John McCain’s call for less regulation so that no one in Washington is watching anyone on Wall Street. We’ve seen where that’s led us and we’re not going back.

It is time to turn the page on eight years of economic policies that put Wall Street before Main Street but ended up hurting both. We need policies that grow our economy from the bottom-up, so that every American, everywhere has the chance to get ahead. Not just corporate CEOs, but their secretaries too. Not just the person who owns the factory, but the men and women who work on its floor. Because if we’ve learned anything from this economic crisis, it’s that we’re all connected; we’re all in this together; and we will rise or fall as one nation – as one people.

The rescue plan that passed Congress last week isn’t the end of what we’ll do to strengthen this economy, it’s only the beginning. Now we need to pass a rescue plan for the middle-class that will provide every family immediate relief to cope with rising food and gas prices, save one million jobs by rebuilding our schools and roads, and help states and cities avoid budget cuts and tax increases. And we should extend expiring unemployment benefits to those Americans who’ve lost their jobs and can’t find new ones. I’ve been fighting for this plan for months. My opponent has said nothing. And that is the choice in this election.

You’ve heard a lot about taxes in this campaign. Well here’s the truth – John McCain and I are both offering tax cuts. The difference is, he wants to give the average Fortune 500 CEO a $700,000 tax cut but nothing at all to over 100 million Americans.

I’ll give a middle-class tax cut to 95% of all workers. And if you make less than $250,000 a year, you won’t see your taxes increase one single dime – not your payroll taxes, not your income taxes, not your capital gains taxes – nothing. Because in an economy like this, the last thing we should do is raise taxes on the middle-class.

My opponent wants to give $200 million in tax cuts to the biggest corporations in America. I will eliminate capital gains taxes for the small businesses and the start-ups that will create the high-wage, high-tech jobs of tomorrow.

John McCain wants to give tax breaks to the corporations that ship our jobs overseas. If I am President, I will end those tax breaks and give them to companies that create good jobs in the United States of America. That is the choice in this election.

Senator McCain’s first reaction to this economic crisis was to say that “the fundamentals of our economy are strong.” Well I don’t know about you, but where I come from there’s nothing more fundamental than a job – not just because it provides a paycheck, because it provides a sense of dignity. And if we want to turn this economy around and lead the world in the 21st century, we have to create the high-wage jobs of tomorrow right here in America.

If I am President, I will invest $15 billion a year in renewable sources of energy to create five million new, green jobs over the next decade – jobs that pay well and can’t be outsourced; jobs building solar panels and wind turbines and fuel-efficient cars; jobs that will help us end our dependence on oil from Middle East dictators.

I’ll also put two million more Americans to work rebuilding our crumbling roads, schools, and bridges – because it is time to build an American infrastructure for the 21st century.

And we’ll give every child, everywhere the skills and the knowledge they need to compete with any worker, anywhere in the world. I will not allow countries to out-teach us today so they can out-compete us tomorrow. It is time to provide every American with a world-class education. That means investing in early childhood education. That means recruiting an army of new teachers, and paying them better, and giving them more support in exchange for higher standards and more accountability. And it means making a deal with every American who has the drive and the will but not the money to go to college: if you commit to serving your country after you graduate, we will make sure you can afford your tuition. You invest in America, America will invest in you, and together we will move this country forward.

Finally, I will take on the corruption in Washington and on Wall Street to make sure a crisis like this can never, ever happen again. I’ll put in place the common-sense regulations and rules of the road I’ve been calling for since March – rules that will keep our market free, fair, and honest; rules that will restore accountability and responsibility in our corporate boardrooms.

And just as we demand accountability on Wall Street, I will also demand it in Washington. That’s why I’m not going to stand here and simply tell you what I’m going to spend, I’m going to tell you how we’re going to save when I am President.

I’ll do what you do in your own family budgets and make sure we’re spending money wisely. I will go through the entire federal budget, page by page, line by line, and eliminate programs that don’t work and aren’t needed. We’ll start by ending a war in Iraq that’s costing $10 billion a month while the Iraqi government sits on a $79 billion surplus. And we’ll save billions more by cutting waste, improving management, and strengthening oversight.

These are the changes and reforms we need. A new era of responsibility and accountability on Wall Street and in Washington. Common-sense regulations to prevent a crisis like this from ever happening again. Investments in the technology and innovation that will restore prosperity and lead to new jobs and a new economy for the 21st century. Bottom-up growth that gives every American a fair shot at the American dream.

I won’t pretend this will be easy or come without cost. We will all need to sacrifice and we will all need to pull our weight because now more than ever, we are all in this together. What this crisis has taught us is that at the end of the day, there is no real separation between Main Street and Wall Street. There is only the road we’re traveling on as Americans – and we will rise or fall on that journey as one nation; as one people.

This country and the dream it represents are being tested in a way that we haven’t seen in nearly a century. And future generations will judge ours by how we respond to this test. Will they say that this was a time when America lost its way and its purpose? When we allowed our own petty differences and broken politics to plunge this country into a dark and painful recession?

Or will they say that this was another one of those moments when America overcame? When we battled back from adversity by recognizing that common stake that we have in each other’s success?

This is one of those moments. I realize you’re cynical and fed up with politics. I understand that you’re disappointed and even angry with your leaders. You have every right to be. But despite all of this, I ask of you what’s been asked of the American people in times of trial and turmoil throughout our history. I ask you to believe – to believe in yourselves, in each other, and in the future we can build together.

Together, we cannot fail. Not now. Not when we have a crisis to solve and an economy to save. Not when there are so many Americans without jobs and without homes. Not when there are families who can’t afford to see a doctor, or send their child to college, or pay their bills at the end of the month. Not when there is a generation that is counting on us to give them the same opportunities and the same chances that we had for ourselves.

We can do this. Americans have done this before. Some of us had grandparents or parents who said maybe I can't go to college but my child can; maybe I can't have my own business but my child can. I may have to rent, but maybe my children will have a home they can call their own. I may not have a lot of money but maybe my child will run for Senate. I might live in a small village but maybe someday my son can be president of the United States of America.

Now it falls to us. Together, we cannot fail. And I need you to make it happen. If you want the next four years looking like the last eight, then I am not your candidate. But if you want real change – if you want an economy that rewards work, and that works for Main Street and Wall Street; if you want tax relief for the middle class and millions of new jobs; if you want health care you can afford and education that helps your kids compete; then I ask you to knock on some doors, make some calls, talk to your neighbors, and give me your vote on November 4th. And if you do, I promise you – we will win Indiana, we will win this election, and then you and I – together – will change this country and change this world. Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless America.
 
Wow. Gallup now shows Obama up by 11 points, although his lead in other polls have shrunk slightly. Obviously too soon to tell what affect the debate will have.

 
Wow. Gallup now shows Obama up by 11 points, although his lead in other polls have shrunk slightly. Obviously too soon to tell what affect the debate will have.
There was a good post I read about his "cieling" of votes. In a very partisan America, that's divided pretty strongly, pulling out with a big lead is very tough. You get the most of the base you can, and convince the most independents and undecideds you can, but it's very hard to peel away votes more than that. It's hard to switch someone from an R to a D...so the wiggle room is limited.Has Obama reached his vote cieling yet with his several percentage point lead? Perhaps, and we'll see, but it's certailny not comforting to see multiple polls have him slip down a point or two here.He's certainly expected to come down off his highs the past week or so, but hopefully he won't come down too much.
 
Wow. Gallup now shows Obama up by 11 points, although his lead in other polls have shrunk slightly. Obviously too soon to tell what affect the debate will have.
There was a good post I read about his "cieling" of votes. In a very partisan America, that's divided pretty strongly, pulling out with a big lead is very tough. You get the most of the base you can, and convince the most independents and undecideds you can, but it's very hard to peel away votes more than that. It's hard to switch someone from an R to a D...so the wiggle room is limited.Has Obama reached his vote cieling yet with his several percentage point lead? Perhaps, and we'll see, but it's certailny not comforting to see multiple polls have him slip down a point or two here.He's certainly expected to come down off his highs the past week or so, but hopefully he won't come down too much.
This article was posted at 538.com, by the way.
 
Which state should I vote for Obama in? Living in NY now, but I'm still registered to vote in GA from my college days.

 
Why does this format favor mccain? He does these townhalls a lot, but it's just a forum for him to give his stump speeches on a variety of topics like any other. I've been to one of these this year already. Nothing came out that hadn't come out in print from his stump speeches at any point to date. Only the current event questions could be interpreted as new, but those always get spun back to old material. This is my least favorite debate of the season. The "fakeness" of the event just wears on me after awhile. Having "real" people there does nothing to change the message. Will he actually look at BO tonight? How many times will he use naive?What's the drinking game du jour?
Drink to words and phrases for McCain:"What Obama doesn't understand is...""My Friends,""liberal""Maverick""warshington"
Are you trying to turn us into a nation of alcoholics?My Obama ones are"Look" (*only if he starts a sentence with it. "Look, I came here to talk about the issues")"Crisis" (down full beer if "Economic Crisis")"Middle Class""George Bush""Small Business"
"Let me be perfectly clear"
"Fundamental"This will lead to alcohol poisoning.
 
McCain is going to Iowa again this Saturday according to politico.com.

Why is McCain going back to Iowa?Every public poll there has him down big to Obama, but McCain has scheduled a rally for Davenport this Saturday.The rationale, via Dan Balz:Mike DuHaime, McCain's political director, said internal campaign polling does not make the electoral map look as bad as some public polls suggest. For example: Asked why, if he has given up on Michigan, McCain has not given up on Iowa, a state that looks strong for Obama in public polls, DuHaime said because the campaign's polling has Obama's lead in the low single digits.
I really think McCain's run a terrible campaign since the conventions. If all they've got is Bill Ayres (which only Fox News fans care about right now given the awful economy) and they are wasting precious time in Iowa - they've got no game plan to win.
 
Michelle was awesome on Larry King tonight. Classy, above the fray, intelligent....the woman has it together.
:goodposting: I thought this was interview was great too
So did my wife. And she was a Michelle detractor 8 months ago. I missed it.
Great, great interview. She displayed tons of intelligence, class, eloquence, compassion and commitment to improving life in the U.S. for everyone.
I can't decide whether I have a bigger womancrush on Michelle Obama or Rachel Maddow.
 
Michelle was awesome on Larry King tonight. Classy, above the fray, intelligent....the woman has it together.
:lmao: I thought this was interview was great too
So did my wife. And she was a Michelle detractor 8 months ago. I missed it.
Great, great interview. She displayed tons of intelligence, class, eloquence, compassion and commitment to improving life in the U.S. for everyone.
I can't decide whether I have a bigger womancrush on Michelle Obama or Rachel Maddow.
I love me some Stephanie Miller.
 
Michelle was awesome on Larry King tonight. Classy, above the fray, intelligent....the woman has it together.
:lmao: I thought this was interview was great too
So did my wife. And she was a Michelle detractor 8 months ago. I missed it.
Great, great interview. She displayed tons of intelligence, class, eloquence, compassion and commitment to improving life in the U.S. for everyone.
she was pretty fantastic on The Daily Show with Jon last night too.
 
Does this have legs? One of my boys sent it to me. Who really wrote Dreams From My Father"?
This is absolutely hysterical. Good find. :popcorn: :goodposting:
I'm going to need some proof that Jack Cashill really wrote that article. I can't prove that he didn't write it, but my preliminary QSUM analysis is split as to whether this was really written by Cahill, Limbaugh, Hannity, or 500 monkeys typing randomly on a keyboard for 1000 years. I'm leaning towards the monkeys.

 
Does this have legs? One of my boys sent it to me. Who really wrote Dreams From My Father"?
This is absolutely hysterical. Good find. :thumbup: :popcorn:
I'm going to need some proof that Jack Cashill really wrote that article. I can't prove that he didn't write it, but my preliminary QSUM analysis is split as to whether this was really written by Cahill, Limbaugh, Hannity, or 500 monkeys typing randomly on a keyboard for 1000 years. I'm leaning towards the monkeys.
:goodposting: You really think it would take the monkeys 1000 years?

I'm thinking a Tuesday afternoon ought to do it...

 
Does this have legs? One of my boys sent it to me. Who really wrote Dreams From My Father"?
This is absolutely hysterical. Good find. :potkettle: :potkettle:
I'm going to need some proof that Jack Cashill really wrote that article. I can't prove that he didn't write it, but my preliminary QSUM analysis is split as to whether this was really written by Cahill, Limbaugh, Hannity, or 500 monkeys typing randomly on a keyboard for 1000 years. I'm leaning towards the monkeys.
:potkettle: You really think it would take the monkeys 1000 years?

I'm thinking a Tuesday afternoon ought to do it...
Hmmm... how big a monkey?
 
Does this have legs? One of my boys sent it to me. Who really wrote Dreams From My Father"?
This is absolutely hysterical. Good find. :potkettle: :potkettle:
I'm going to need some proof that Jack Cashill really wrote that article. I can't prove that he didn't write it, but my preliminary QSUM analysis is split as to whether this was really written by Cahill, Limbaugh, Hannity, or 500 monkeys typing randomly on a keyboard for 1000 years. I'm leaning towards the monkeys.
:potkettle: You really think it would take the monkeys 1000 years?

I'm thinking a Tuesday afternoon ought to do it...
Hmmm... how big a monkey?
5'1" and 100 pounds* would be good. :pickle: *FTR, I refer to hot chicks as monkeys on occasion.

 
I think Obama's most serious dilemma now is not being elected (looks like a shoo-in to me) but his delusional liberal supporters he will face when he is elected. I was watching Real Time With Bill Maher last night and I saw a hint of this, which will get louder over time. The progressives I have seen on TV, besides blaming Bush and glorying in a win for Obama, have no real clue what to make of the economic meltdown. Certainly any suggestion that Obama will not be able to undertake the spending programs he has promised is meant with blank stares. After all, he's going to have a Democratic majority in both houses of Congress, probably a strong one. When could there be a more opportune time to bring in Universal Health Care and everything else the Dems have wanted to achieve in decades?

Obama will be caught between a rock and a hard place. For the USA to regain economic confidence around the world, he's got to show fiscal responsibility. Yet he's made all these promises in his campaign and he will be pressured heavily to keep them. I bring this up now because if I were him I would temper these promises right now, prior to the election. It's not going to change any votes. And if he does, he'll have a much easier time of it. Specifically, I would suggest he publicly say that any changes to the health care system are going to have to wait until "the economic situation has clarified." It's true anyway, why not say it?

 
PPP Poll: Obama Way Ahead in ColoradoA new Public Policy Polling survey in Colorado shows Sen. Barack Obama now leading Sen. John McCainby ten points, 52% to 42%.Key findings: Obama is now leading 71% to 21% with Hispanic voters, a considerable improvement from a 57% to 36% edge in PPP's survey of the state taken three weeks ago. The white vote is exactly the same as it was previously, a 48% to 47% advantage for Obama.Analysis: "The numbers paint a picture that shows it nearly impossible for McCain to win the state at this point. Only 6% of voters are undecided, and among those who do have a preference currently only 6% say there's any chance they could change their mind. Obama's lead at this point is such that McCain would have to win virtually every undecided, keep everyone who could change their mind currently supporting him in his camp, and win over almost 100% of current Obama supporters who say they aren't totally committed to him. The chances of all those things happening? Not very good."
 
Obama Locks Up the 106-Year-Old Nun Demographic :thumbdown:

A 106-year-old American nun living in a convent in Rome could well be the oldest person to vote in the 2008 US Presidential election.

Sister Cecilia Gaudette, who last voted for President Eisenhower in 1952, has registered to vote and says she will vote for Democrat Barack Obama.

Although hard of hearing, she keeps herself informed by reading newspapers and watching TV at the convent.

"I'm encouraged by Senator Obama," she says.

"I've never met him, but he seems to be a good man with a good private life. That's the first thing. Then he must be able to govern," she adds.

Sitting in her modest office in the convent where she has lived for the past 50 years, the diminutive nun appears uninterested in the row inside the American Catholic church over Senator Obama's support for pro-choice policies on abortion.

Asked about her hopes for the US under an Obama presidency, she says: "Peace abroad. I don't worry about the Iraq war because I can't do anything about it. Lord knows how it will end."

"It is very complicated," she said. "Those Eastern people are not like we are."

But despite taking part in the 4 November election, Sister Cecilia does not intend to return to the US.

"I have no plans for the future. I am too old to go back to the US. Life has changed too much."

But she still watches "very important events" on TV. The election comes under this category.
 
Pulling Away

The global financial meltdown has caused a dramatic shift in the 2008 presidential race, according to the latest NEWSWEEK poll. With four weeks left in the presidential campaign, Barack Obama now leads John McCain by double digits, 52 percent to 41 percent among registered voters—a marked shift from the last NEWSWEEK poll, conducted one month ago, when the two candidates were tied at 46 percent.

Underlying Obama's surge in support: An historic boiling over of dissatisfaction with the status quo. An astounding 86 percent of voters now say they are dissatisfied with the way things are going in the United States, while a mere 10 percent say they are satisfied. That's the highest wrong track/right track ratio ever recorded in the NEWSWEEK poll.

For context on just how toxic these numbers could be for the Republic party, consider that in October, 2006, weeks before the Democrats swept control of both houses of Congress, only 61 percent of voters expressed dissatisfaction. Twenty-five percent of voters say they approve of the job President Bush is doing in the White House, a record low for any president in the NEWSWEEK poll and close to the historic low-approval rating of 22 percent the Gallup poll recorded for President Truman, in 1952. Voters are crying out for change and, for now, believe that the Democratic presidential candidate has a greater likelihood of delivering it. Asked which ticket they thought was most likely to bring about change if elected, voters said Obama-Biden over McCain-Palin 52 percent to 37 percent. A month ago, Obama-Biden led by only five points, 47 percent to 42 percent.

Obama appears to have broadened his coalition of support and made inroads with groups that have not reliably embraced him over the course of the long presidential campaign. He now leads McCain among both men (54 percent to 40 percent) and women (50 percent to 41 percent). He now wins every age group of voters—including those over 65 years of age, who back him over McCain 49 to 43 percent. Supporters of Hillary Clinton, as many as a fifth of whom had at one point told pollsters they'd support McCain over Obama, now back the Democratic nominee 88 percent to 7 percent.

One topic, the economy, is clearly driving Obama's spike. Asked which issue was most important in determining their vote, 48 percent of those surveyed said the economy. (The next highest was taxes and government and spending, which 10 percent of voters identified as their number one issue; only 8 percent named the Iraq war as their most important issue.) Asked which candidate would better handle a variety of issues, voters chose Obama over McCain in every single category with the exception of national security and terrorism; McCain still leads on that front 50 percent to 40 percent. Obama now leads McCain on the economy and jobs (54 percent to 35 percent); on the Iraq war (47 percent to 46 percent); on energy policy and gas prices (53 percent to 36 percent); on health care (56 percent to 30 percent); on taxes and government spending (50 percent to 39 percent); on the financial problems of Wall Street and the mortgage crisis (50 percent to 34 percent); and on issues like abortion, guns and same-sex marriage (46 percent to 39 percent).

Still, the poll suggests that despite his lead and the extremely favorable conditions for a Democratic candidate, Obama has not yet established himself as the firm choice of swing voters. In fact, McCain, who has banked on a large and deep reservoir of goodwill from middle-of-the-road voters, still leads Obama among independents, albeit by only two points (45 percent to 43 percent). That's actually a slightly better showing for McCain than in the September NEWSWEEK poll, when Obama led McCain 44 percent to 43 percent among voters who described themselves as Independent. Party identification, it should be noted, can change significantly month to month, and voters may be particularly inclined to self-identify as Democrats in a year when Democrats are favored over Republicans. Among white Catholics, a group that has voted with the winner of every American presidential contest since 1960, Obama leads McCain by only one point (48 percent to 47 percent).

The poll suggests that the McCain campaign's strategy of sharp attacks on Obama's character have not yet had their desired effect and may, in fact, be backfiring. In recent days, McCain's campaign—and, in particular, his running mate, Sarah Palin—have sought to highlight Obama's ties to the '60s radical William Ayers and paint the Democratic nominee as outside of the mainstream. But 60 percent of voters said they have a favorable view of Obama, while 36 percent said they viewed the Democratic candidate unfavorably. That's actually an improvement from a month ago, when Obama's favorable to unfavorable ratio was 57 to 37. In the same period, McCain's favorability rating has decreased, from 57 percent in September to 51 percent today, while his unfavorable percentage have risen, 36 to 45.

Further, 59 percent of voters in the poll said Obama shares their values, compared to 37 percent who said he does not. By contrast, 47 percent of voters said McCain shares their values while 49 percent said he does not. Forty-eight percent of voters said Palin shares their values, while 47 percent said she does not.

Palin's support appears to be slipping. While 60 percent of voters think Palin would fit in well with their local community, only 39 percent of those surveyed say they believe McCain's running mate is qualified to serve as president, while 55 believe she is not.
ArticleI particularly like the vindication on the Hillary front. As I, and many others, said all but a few Hillary supporters(some of whom reside here) would come to support Obama when it came to crunch time.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Barack Obama now leads John McCain by double digits, 52 percent to 41 percent among registered voters—a marked shift from the last NEWSWEEK poll, conducted one month ago, when the two candidates were tied at 46 percent.
All I get out of that article is this: you can have a 11 point net change in a month. There's about 3 weeks left - McCain's not done yet.Get out there and hit the phones people, don't get complacent.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Barack Obama now leads John McCain by double digits, 52 percent to 41 percent among registered voters—a marked shift from the last NEWSWEEK poll, conducted one month ago, when the two candidates were tied at 46 percent.
All I get out of that article is this: you can have a 10 point net change in a month. There's about 3 weeks left - McCain's not done yet.Get out there and hit the phones people, don't get complacent.
Oh yeah it ain't over. But I like the trends. And I can't believe NC is actually in play for the first time since I moved here. I am very excited about possibly handing NC to the Dems on the national level.
 
Obama Campaign Involved in More Cover-Ups in ACORN Scandal

On Thursday we revealed the connection between Barack Obama and Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), and uncovered a 2004 article that discussed his involvement with the organization which had recently been removed from the web. Today, the cover-ups continue and language on Obama's fightthesmears.com website has been altered in order to make it look like he has been telling the truth about his ACORN associations all along.

Fortunately, we and many others online know how to do a screen capture and how to use a little something called Google Cache.

As of yesterday, Fightthesmears.com stated:

Fact: Barack was never an ACORN trainer and never worked for ACORN in any other capacity.

Sometime on Friday, the website was altered, and the text was changed to state:

Fact: ACORN never hired Obama as a trainer, organizer, or any type of employee.

The mere fact that his campaign has now changed the language of the site shows that they have conceded the fact that their original remark was a bold-face lie. As a lawyer Sen. Obama should know the importance of language.

The original statement implied that he had no working connection with ACORN, whereas the new statement now insists that he has never been employed or hired by ACORN.

It is good to see the truth finally come out now, but why were they trying to hide his association with ACORN, and what else is Obama lying to us about? Perhaps the biggest question now is how and why they got the Social Policy article stricken from most of the world wide web in the first.place. What are they trying to hide?
 
Iran sets preconditions for meeting with Obama if he becomes President

Iran's Vice President Sets Two Preconditions for Talks with US

TEHRAN (FNA)- Vice President for Media Affairs Mehdi Kalhor said on Saturday that Iran has set two preconditions for holding talks with the United States of America.

In an exclusive interview with the Islamic Republic News Agency, he said as long as U.S. forces have not left the Middle East region and continues its support for the Zionist regime, talks between Iran and U.S. is off the agenda.

It is the Americans who are in dire need of reestablishing ties with Iran, he underlined.

Iran is not obliged to reestablish ties with the U.S., he said.

"If they take our advice, grounds for such talks would be well prepared," he said.

It is stupidity to hold talks without any change in U.S. attitude, he underlined.
 
I have come to grips with the fact that Barack Obama will be our next president. He is a decent man and I wish him well.

But it's time for Obama supporters and the man himself to come to grips with this fact, as well. You all need to realize right now that it is unrealistic to expect the the things that he has been promising throughout his campaign, and it will be bad for our country if he goes forward with them. Barack Obama needs to be the President of all of us, and not just progressives, and that means his #1 priority HAS TO BE cutting, not increasing expenditures. Ironically, in order to succeed, Obama needs to become the sort of President that McCain has vaguely promised to be: the reformer, who changes our system. To do this, he's going to have to take on entrenched members of both parties. The cuts will have to be significant in all areas, and a lot of Americans are going to be unhappy. Obama will not be popular. I'm afraid some of his earliest supporters are going to feel betrayed. But he's got to show courage, which I think he has. If he can succeed, he will become one of our greatest leaders. I'm rooting for him, but I wouldn't want to be him.

 
I have come to grips with the fact that Barack Obama will be our next president. He is a decent man and I wish him well.But it's time for Obama supporters and the man himself to come to grips with this fact, as well. You all need to realize right now that it is unrealistic to expect the the things that he has been promising throughout his campaign, and it will be bad for our country if he goes forward with them. Barack Obama needs to be the President of all of us, and not just progressives, and that means his #1 priority HAS TO BE cutting, not increasing expenditures. Ironically, in order to succeed, Obama needs to become the sort of President that McCain has vaguely promised to be: the reformer, who changes our system. To do this, he's going to have to take on entrenched members of both parties. The cuts will have to be significant in all areas, and a lot of Americans are going to be unhappy. Obama will not be popular. I'm afraid some of his earliest supporters are going to feel betrayed. But he's got to show courage, which I think he has. If he can succeed, he will become one of our greatest leaders. I'm rooting for him, but I wouldn't want to be him.
Actually, if tough economic times are ahead, it's not a terrible thing to engage in deficit spending, to encourage job growth, to pay people to help us rebuild, to invest in the education of our workforce. Look back to the great depression, some of the worst economic times you can remember, and it's full of deficit spending, meant to put our country back on the right track. Many of Obama's programs would serve us well long term, including his educaiton plans, and his challenge for us to become energy independent in only a decade. We can do these things. We can rebuild our infrastructure, employing americans to do this. We can reshape our auto industry, producing cars that make our country competitive again, we can rebuild our country, retool our workforce and prepare them for future jobs, we can ensure a healthy workforce by guaranteeing affordable healthcare to all.Simply running a deficit doesn't mean we have to cut all spending programs, but it does mean that we need to focus the programs we choose to fund on those that will make us a stronger country in the future. Deficit spending isn't all bad, but it certainly is bad if it's something like Iraq which costs billions upon billions of dollars, but doesn't leave us as a country and better off. We need smart spending, not no spending. It's the same mistake John McCain wants to make by freezing all funding of programs for a while...that's taking a hatchet to fix this problem, while Obama wants to use a scalpel.We certainly have challenging times ahead, and we need responsibility in spending, but responsibility does not necessarily mean no increases in spending. It means wise spending, wise investing, wise use of our resources. Obama will bring that.
 
I have come to grips with the fact that Barack Obama will be our next president. He is a decent man and I wish him well.But it's time for Obama supporters and the man himself to come to grips with this fact, as well. You all need to realize right now that it is unrealistic to expect the the things that he has been promising throughout his campaign, and it will be bad for our country if he goes forward with them. Barack Obama needs to be the President of all of us, and not just progressives, and that means his #1 priority HAS TO BE cutting, not increasing expenditures. Ironically, in order to succeed, Obama needs to become the sort of President that McCain has vaguely promised to be: the reformer, who changes our system. To do this, he's going to have to take on entrenched members of both parties. The cuts will have to be significant in all areas, and a lot of Americans are going to be unhappy. Obama will not be popular. I'm afraid some of his earliest supporters are going to feel betrayed. But he's got to show courage, which I think he has. If he can succeed, he will become one of our greatest leaders. I'm rooting for him, but I wouldn't want to be him.
I think you'll be pleasantly surprised to discover he's more pragmatic than people think. He'll raise taxes on the upper echelons like he's promised and cut taxes for middle class but I expect to see some cuts made in spending when necessary. I'd like to see some deep corporate welfare cuts. Even though he's stated he wants to see the military strengthened I would be surprised if he didn't find some projects to cut there as well. The military budget is immense. Some foreign aid cuts may be looked at as well.
 
I have come to grips with the fact that Barack Obama will be our next president. He is a decent man and I wish him well.But it's time for Obama supporters and the man himself to come to grips with this fact, as well. You all need to realize right now that it is unrealistic to expect the the things that he has been promising throughout his campaign, and it will be bad for our country if he goes forward with them. Barack Obama needs to be the President of all of us, and not just progressives, and that means his #1 priority HAS TO BE cutting, not increasing expenditures. Ironically, in order to succeed, Obama needs to become the sort of President that McCain has vaguely promised to be: the reformer, who changes our system. To do this, he's going to have to take on entrenched members of both parties. The cuts will have to be significant in all areas, and a lot of Americans are going to be unhappy. Obama will not be popular. I'm afraid some of his earliest supporters are going to feel betrayed. But he's got to show courage, which I think he has. If he can succeed, he will become one of our greatest leaders. I'm rooting for him, but I wouldn't want to be him.
I have more faith that a Democrat will do this than Republican.
 
I have come to grips with the fact that Barack Obama will be our next president. He is a decent man and I wish him well.But it's time for Obama supporters and the man himself to come to grips with this fact, as well. You all need to realize right now that it is unrealistic to expect the the things that he has been promising throughout his campaign, and it will be bad for our country if he goes forward with them. Barack Obama needs to be the President of all of us, and not just progressives, and that means his #1 priority HAS TO BE cutting, not increasing expenditures. Ironically, in order to succeed, Obama needs to become the sort of President that McCain has vaguely promised to be: the reformer, who changes our system. To do this, he's going to have to take on entrenched members of both parties. The cuts will have to be significant in all areas, and a lot of Americans are going to be unhappy. Obama will not be popular. I'm afraid some of his earliest supporters are going to feel betrayed. But he's got to show courage, which I think he has. If he can succeed, he will become one of our greatest leaders. I'm rooting for him, but I wouldn't want to be him.
Actually, if tough economic times are ahead, it's not a terrible thing to engage in deficit spending, to encourage job growth, to pay people to help us rebuild, to invest in the education of our workforce. Look back to the great depression, some of the worst economic times you can remember, and it's full of deficit spending, meant to put our country back on the right track. Many of Obama's programs would serve us well long term, including his educaiton plans, and his challenge for us to become energy independent in only a decade. We can do these things. We can rebuild our infrastructure, employing americans to do this. We can reshape our auto industry, producing cars that make our country competitive again, we can rebuild our country, retool our workforce and prepare them for future jobs, we can ensure a healthy workforce by guaranteeing affordable healthcare to all.Simply running a deficit doesn't mean we have to cut all spending programs, but it does mean that we need to focus the programs we choose to fund on those that will make us a stronger country in the future. Deficit spending isn't all bad, but it certainly is bad if it's something like Iraq which costs billions upon billions of dollars, but doesn't leave us as a country and better off. We need smart spending, not no spending. It's the same mistake John McCain wants to make by freezing all funding of programs for a while...that's taking a hatchet to fix this problem, while Obama wants to use a scalpel.We certainly have challenging times ahead, and we need responsibility in spending, but responsibility does not necessarily mean no increases in spending. It means wise spending, wise investing, wise use of our resources. Obama will bring that.
The problem is, the deficit is so big already. Unlike the Great Depression, when we were just beginning to entertain the idea of deficit spending, we've already got tons of it. We need foreign investors, and that means serious cuts. What you're suggesting is no longer realistic under the circumstances. Yes, the war in Iraq is going to have to end, but so is a lot of other things that people will not be happy about.
 
I have come to grips with the fact that Barack Obama will be our next president. He is a decent man and I wish him well.But it's time for Obama supporters and the man himself to come to grips with this fact, as well. You all need to realize right now that it is unrealistic to expect the the things that he has been promising throughout his campaign, and it will be bad for our country if he goes forward with them. Barack Obama needs to be the President of all of us, and not just progressives, and that means his #1 priority HAS TO BE cutting, not increasing expenditures. Ironically, in order to succeed, Obama needs to become the sort of President that McCain has vaguely promised to be: the reformer, who changes our system. To do this, he's going to have to take on entrenched members of both parties. The cuts will have to be significant in all areas, and a lot of Americans are going to be unhappy. Obama will not be popular. I'm afraid some of his earliest supporters are going to feel betrayed. But he's got to show courage, which I think he has. If he can succeed, he will become one of our greatest leaders. I'm rooting for him, but I wouldn't want to be him.
I think you'll be pleasantly surprised to discover he's more pragmatic than people think. He'll raise taxes on the upper echelons like he's promised and cut taxes for middle class but I expect to see some cuts made in spending when necessary. I'd like to see some deep corporate welfare cuts. Even though he's stated he wants to see the military strengthened I would be surprised if he didn't find some projects to cut there as well. The military budget is immense. Some foreign aid cuts may be looked at as well.
I don't believe raising taxes on the upper echelons will bring in the revenue he expects. In fact, and I write this as a fiscal conservative, I believe it will slow the economy even further and bring in less revenue. Yes there will be corporate welfare cuts, but if the result is more major corporations going under we've got a problem. And as far as the miltary and foreign aid are concerned, don't forget there are a lot of companies (and people) who depend on a living from these things. There are no cuts that are possible without hurting a whole lot of people. There is no new spending that we can afford. We are in big trouble.
 
I have come to grips with the fact that Barack Obama will be our next president. He is a decent man and I wish him well.But it's time for Obama supporters and the man himself to come to grips with this fact, as well. You all need to realize right now that it is unrealistic to expect the the things that he has been promising throughout his campaign, and it will be bad for our country if he goes forward with them. Barack Obama needs to be the President of all of us, and not just progressives, and that means his #1 priority HAS TO BE cutting, not increasing expenditures. Ironically, in order to succeed, Obama needs to become the sort of President that McCain has vaguely promised to be: the reformer, who changes our system. To do this, he's going to have to take on entrenched members of both parties. The cuts will have to be significant in all areas, and a lot of Americans are going to be unhappy. Obama will not be popular. I'm afraid some of his earliest supporters are going to feel betrayed. But he's got to show courage, which I think he has. If he can succeed, he will become one of our greatest leaders. I'm rooting for him, but I wouldn't want to be him.
I have more faith that a Democrat will do this than Republican.
You may well be right, and I certainly hope you are. I strongly distrust EITHER political party when it is in control of President, House, and Senate. But that's what we will have, so I hope for the best.
 
Howard Stern show interviews clueless Obama supporters

Howard Stern Interviews Obama Supporters

Actually Sal is the one who interviewed Obama supporters in Harlem and asked them why they support Obama. Here's the kicker: Sal substituted McCain's views for Obama's but Obama's supporters didn't know the difference. Yikes! And for fairness, one person supported McCain, but he didn't know what was going on either. Keep in mind, we're talking about Howard Stern here, so I'm issuing a bad language warning in case you've got kids in the room. (video at site)
 
Whoever this guy Link Poster is, apparently he just wants to fill any Obama/McCain thread with the most slanted anti-Obama stuff, all of which is from Right Wing extremists like Michelle Malkin. I don't know what purpose this serves, but it's awfully irritating. Not a single post so far has anything credible or even worth discussing. Why does he bother?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top