BeTheMatch
Let it burn!
Strange that I'm not seeing any stories about negotiations resuming. Or not resuming. Seems like it would be newsworthy either way almost two weeks later.
Travis Snider has decided to retire after eight Major League seasons.
"I have contemplated this day for for a while but the time has finally come for me to hang up the spikes," he wrote on Instagram.
"I have spent many waking hours and sleepless nights trying to find a way back to the show. How to fix my swing. How to be a better teammate and a leader. What I have learned through those experiences is what gives me the confidence in this transition to becoming a 'former player.'"
Snider, who turns 34 next month, last played in the Major Leaguers in 2015 with the Pittsburgh Pirates. He was the 14th overall pick of the Toronto Blue Jays in 2006.
There doesn't seem to be any urgency from either side.BeTheMatch said:This lockout that was initially described as no big deal is going to end up costing games, isn't it?
And nobody seems to care.There doesn't seem to be any urgency from either side.
The Atlanta Braves have been hesitant in signing Freddie Freeman to a long-term deal because of the financial strain it would place on their budget.BeTheMatch said:This season isn't happening unless the players completely cave. MLB simply refuses to negotiate. Their "offers" are a complete joke. They're clearly trying to bust the union.
I had an idea awhile back of trying to make the season a little more like football schedule wise. Basically you have one 3-game or 4-game series a week. The series are either Fri-Sun, Thur-Sun or Fri-Mon. That way each series is meaningful and there is a build up of anticipation each week to the games. You can make it a 100-120 game schedule. I would assume the level of play would increase and you can showcase the game better to the fan. You can have marquee Thursday and Monday night games and they become more of an event.A 100 game season sounds awesome. I loved the covid season because every game actually mattered. A 162-game season followed by a short playoff series is ridiculous. Hopefully they don’t reach a deal till June.
Sounds great, honestly.I had an idea awhile back of trying to make the season a little more like football schedule wise. Basically you have one 3-game or 4-game series a week. The series are either Fri-Sun, Thur-Sun or Fri-Mon. That way each series is meaningful and there is a build up of anticipation each week to the games. You can make it a 100-120 game schedule. I would assume the level of play would increase and you can showcase the game better to the fan. You can have marquee Thursday and Monday night games and they become more of an event.
Every game will matter more. I know it will never happen but it would be interesting to try.
I kinda like this even if it is just a pipe dream. You would also have built in off days to play rainouts the same weekI had an idea awhile back of trying to make the season a little more like football schedule wise. Basically you have one 3-game or 4-game series a week. The series are either Fri-Sun, Thur-Sun or Fri-Mon. That way each series is meaningful and there is a build up of anticipation each week to the games. You can make it a 100-120 game schedule. I would assume the level of play would increase and you can showcase the game better to the fan. You can have marquee Thursday and Monday night games and they become more of an event.
Every game will matter more. I know it will never happen but it would be interesting to try.
As true as that is, it gives extra hope to a settlement this year. Lose any of these games and the chance of records being broken go way down.They'll never do that because of all the history/records. Those mean more to baseball than any other sport.
It took them 63 days to even extend their first offer. What a sham.This season isn't happening unless the players completely cave. MLB simply refuses to negotiate. Their "offers" are a complete joke. They're clearly trying to bust the union.
This always results in the little man who works for the company taking it in the shorts. The company itself will be just fine.OTOH, if this causes Bally's or whoever owns the Fox/Sinclair RSNs these days to take it in the shorts, it isn't all bad.
True. I'm just salty that my TV provider (Dish) hasn't carried them since 2019 when the last contract expired and they decided to jack up their fees way beyond what Fox was charging.This always results in the little man who works for the company taking it in the shorts. The company itself will be just fine.
I've wondered that too. I'm envisioning painted circles on the field!So they say they have eliminated the shift.....how do they actually enforce it? This is so stupid and a an overall detriment to the game. All it will do is maintain the current approach of swinging for the fences and completely do away with having a solid approach at the plate.
Two infielders must always be on both sides of 2nd base.So they say they have eliminated the shift.....how do they actually enforce it?
But they're saying that alone won't fix it. If a guy is one inch away from second base, he's still on that side.Two infielders must always be on both sides of 2nd base.
Can you play with 4 OF's and three infielders? Then what?Two infielders must always be on both sides of 2nd base.
No, they eliminate that too. Must be on infield.Can you play with 4 OF's and three infielders? Then what?
So does that mean you cannot use 5 infielders with a runner on 3B? Again, this is so stupid. Defense should be able to place fielders anywhere they want. Go with 6 OF's or 6 Infielders. Just terrible.No, they eliminate that too. Must be on infield.
I disagree. It's terrible now. It's led to the worst batting average since before the DH rule. It's ridiculous. It was never envisioned. It's ruining the game, making it even more boring. This won't solve everything, but it will help depending on how they enact it.So does that mean you cannot use 5 infielders with a runner on 3B? Again, this is so stupid. Defense should be able to place fielders anywhere they want. Go with 6 OF's or 6 Infielders. Just terrible.
Good question.Can you play with 4 OF's and three infielders? Then what?
The game was envisioned for the defense to position wherever they felt covered the field the best. There are no original rules disallowing fielders from being any specific location. Part of the strategy of the game is defensive alignment. That includes the "shift", 3B in for obvious bunt situations, and infield in with the winning run at 3B. All of these are based on defensive strategies to limit the offense from what they are trying to do. The shift is no different.I disagree. It's terrible now. It's led to the worst batting average since before the DH rule. It's ridiculous. It was never envisioned. It's ruining the game, making it even more boring. This won't solve everything, but it will help depending on how they enact it.
Have you ever listened to hitters talk about the people who think it should just be so easy for them to beat the shift? It's worth a listen.The game was envisioned for the defense to position wherever they felt covered the field the best. There are no original rules disallowing fielders from being any specific location. Part of the strategy of the game is defensive alignment. That includes the "shift", 3B in for obvious bunt situations, and infield in with the winning run at 3B. All of these are based on defensive strategies to limit the offense from what they are trying to do. The shift is no different.
The problem is the offense hasn't made adjustments for beat the shift. The offense hasn't changed because analytics says swinging for HR's every pitch is better than playing small ball. Maybe that was the case before analytics said to play in a shift to take away hits. Offense needs to adjust to take advantage of the shift. That is how baseball is supposed to work.
The game with the shift isn't the problem. The problem is not taking advantage of the shift. If players stopped swinging from the heels and learned how to actually hit the game would be much better. Watching HR's and K's is boring. That is the problem with the game.
I played through college. I know how hard it is to hit the other way. I also know it's not that hard to bunt to a side of the field with nobody there.Have you ever listened to hitters talk about the people who think it should just be so easy for them to beat the shift? It's worth a listen.
I get everything you're saying, I just disagree with you. It's gone too far. And it very much is part of what's ruining the game.
MLB 2/28: If we don't have an agreement by the end of today, we will cancel games.Ok, will today finally be the day???
I thought they had already canceled 2 weeks (or 2 series or something)?MLB 2/28: If we don't have an agreement by the end of today, we will cancel games.
MLB 3/1: OK, I'm serious if we don't have an agreement by the end of today, we will cancel games.
MLB 3/8: OK, now we are really really really super duper serious. If we don't have an agreement by the end of today, we will cancel games.
MLB 3/9: Cross my fingers and hope to die, if we don't have an agreement by the end of today, we will cancel games.
They canceled the first 2 series last week but now say they can still do a 162 game schedule if they agreed yesterday.I thought they had already canceled 2 weeks (or 2 series or something)?
Yeah, just looked at MLBTR and saw that. I think earlier the owners were saying they would not do doubleheaders to make up for a late start, but looks like they're OK with that now.They canceled the first 2 series last week but now say they can still do a 162 game schedule if they agreed yesterday.![]()
I played through college. I know how hard it is to hit the other way. I also know it's not that hard to bunt to a side of the field with nobody there.
The problem is analytics has swung so far that players are only being taught from the time they are 10 to work launch angle to hit homers and that bunting is bad so they never learn it.
Like I said, analytics needs to catch up and figure out the best way to take advantage of the shift. That is what is great about this game. Adjusting strategies to beat the other team. Doing away with the shift is dumbing down the strategy of the game. You might as well just play over the line and stop running the bases too.
Because nothing puts butts in the seats like seeing Juan Soto lay down a nice bunt!!!!!Yep…learn to bunt