What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

** Official Chicago Bears Offseason thread ** (1 Viewer)

If they draft a RB, I'd guess that Wolfe would be gone.
Where is he goin? He was a 3rd round pick just last year. Way too early to just admit failure with that one.I think he has his place, just have to really pick your spots with him.
It is unusual to carry 4 RB's, but I don't think they are going to cut Wolfe or Peterson. Benson will have one more shot to play with the draft pick from this year, and they will have the 1 FB on the roster. A little unusual, but so be it.
 
My thoughts on the Bears draft.They must, MUST draft three offensive lineman in the first three rounds(four picks).If Brandon Albert is there, take him at 14.Then follow that with a OT in the second round. Anthony Collins? Sam Baker?Then a RB with the first third round pick. Jamaal Charles, Matt Forte, Kevin Smith, etc.Then another OT with the last third round pick. Tony Hills?If Albert is gone and Chris Williams is available(with Otah gone).Take Williams at 14.Then trade up, trade the second round pick and the last third round pick...to get Ghosder Cherilus.Then with the only third round pick now, take the Best Rb avail. Charles, Forte, Smith.If Otah is available. Take Otah at 14.Chilo Rachal in the second round.Top RB available with the first third round pick.Then take the best available OT with the last third round pick. Tony Hills.
Barring an unexpected drop, creating a value pick for the Bears, I expect them to take Jeff Otah. He's considered to be a good run blocker, and the Bears have made it known that their main goal is to re-establish their run game. He is inexperienced, and I do question if he's quick enough to play a tackle spot so this pick does come with questions, but the Bears are in dire need for an OT.I am holding out hope we can move down from #14 and maybe drop in the low 20's, to pick up an extra pick or two, but given their need and the expected availablity of Otah, this seems way too easy for the Bears to just take a OT from that spot.From there, I expect a RB in Round 2 (possibly a QB if someone falls), and then whatever they don't take in Round 2 (between a QB/RB) and then best player available with the 2nd pick in that round. I would not be upset if they took two offensive lineman in the first three rounds.
 
So, Bears fans, let's talk for a post or two about your OWN Adrian Peterson. I'm inclined to believe the Bears won't take a RB until Day 2 this year, if at all......assuming we're correct, I'd enjoy some educated speculation on 'Adrian the First', and his projected workload, etc.FIFTY catches last year - nothing to sneeze at. That's a lot of points for a RB in PPR Format, you can get at a flea market price and plug in as a flex option when the bye weeks get ya down...IF he can muster those #'s again...or possibly see significant work over all 16 Games...Drop some knowledge on me, Bear Oracle. I'll hang up and listen.
I doubt Adrian gets 50 catches again. I anticipate Wolfe getting in on 3rd down more.
If they draft a RB, I'd guess that Wolfe would be gone. His value seems low in the NFL.
I don't think Angelo is ready to eat crow on Wolfe just yet. He's pretty stubborn when it comes to cutting 1st day picks.
I think the same thing but, as someone else said, having 4 rb's on the roster doesn't seem that likely. And they're definitely not cutting Benson or Peterson. WTH knows with the Bears though. I've never understand much of what they do. :shrug:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't see any reason why anyone should give up on Wolfe, and also don't see any reason that they can't carry 4 RBs. I think Wolfe is someone who could make a difference as a returner and a COP back. I think it's a little premature to say he has no place on our team. That being said I didn't like the pick and still don't, especially when a potential franchise back was still on the board. But there's no reason to talk about cutting him. If anyone should be cut, it should be Benson.

 
Per KFFL:

Bears | Team considering trading up in draftMon, 21 Apr 2008 10:31:51 -0700Armando Salguero, of The Miami Herald, reports the Chicago Bears are seriously considering trading up in the 2008 NFL Draft to acquire Boston College QB Matt Ryan.
...but according to them, so are the Panthers and Lions.
 
Per KFFL:

Bears | Team considering trading up in draftMon, 21 Apr 2008 10:31:51 -0700Armando Salguero, of The Miami Herald, reports the Chicago Bears are seriously considering trading up in the 2008 NFL Draft to acquire Boston College QB Matt Ryan.
...but according to them, so are the Panthers and Lions.
Well they have better get up to #5 to get him. I could see the Bears waiting and seeing how the draft unfolds and if he starts to slip they make a move.
 
Per KFFL:

Bears | Team considering trading up in draftMon, 21 Apr 2008 10:31:51 -0700Armando Salguero, of The Miami Herald, reports the Chicago Bears are seriously considering trading up in the 2008 NFL Draft to acquire Boston College QB Matt Ryan.
...but according to them, so are the Panthers and Lions.
:rant: :hot: :wall: :X Oh please God no. Ryan is going to be nothing special and you can get the same player in Flacco or Brohm a round later. Please God, no. The only player the Bears should consider trading up for is Jake Long. Miami wants out of the first, we've got cap room to sign the no. 1 and picks in the third to compensate. GOD, IF YOU ARE OUT THERE, PLEASE DO NOT LET THE BEARS DRAFT RYAN.
 
Per KFFL:

Bears | Team considering trading up in draftMon, 21 Apr 2008 10:31:51 -0700Armando Salguero, of The Miami Herald, reports the Chicago Bears are seriously considering trading up in the 2008 NFL Draft to acquire Boston College QB Matt Ryan.
...but according to them, so are the Panthers and Lions.
:rant: :hot: :wall: :X Oh please God no. Ryan is going to be nothing special and you can get the same player in Flacco or Brohm a round later. Please God, no. The only player the Bears should consider trading up for is Jake Long. Miami wants out of the first, we've got cap room to sign the no. 1 and picks in the third to compensate. GOD, IF YOU ARE OUT THERE, PLEASE DO NOT LET THE BEARS DRAFT RYAN.
I like Ryan, but we have too many holes to be trading up. We need all the picks we can get
 
The bears have flubbed a lot of drafts, especially first-round picks, but this is one draft that they simply can not afford to mess up in any way. I really hope this is just part of the usual chatter that flies around before the draft.

 
Per KFFL:

Bears | Team considering trading up in draftMon, 21 Apr 2008 10:31:51 -0700Armando Salguero, of The Miami Herald, reports the Chicago Bears are seriously considering trading up in the 2008 NFL Draft to acquire Boston College QB Matt Ryan.
...but according to them, so are the Panthers and Lions.
Well they have better get up to #5 to get him. I could see the Bears waiting and seeing how the draft unfolds and if he starts to slip they make a move.
Would a 1st and 3rd be enough ?
 
The bears have flubbed a lot of drafts, especially first-round picks, but this is one draft that they simply can not afford to mess up in any way. I really hope this is just part of the usual chatter that flies around before the draft.
If anything, I prefer trading down to get as many possible picks as possible in the first 3-4 rounds. Bring in 5 or 6 young offensive players to go with what they have currently.
 
Per KFFL:

Bears | Team considering trading up in draftMon, 21 Apr 2008 10:31:51 -0700Armando Salguero, of The Miami Herald, reports the Chicago Bears are seriously considering trading up in the 2008 NFL Draft to acquire Boston College QB Matt Ryan.
...but according to them, so are the Panthers and Lions.
:kicksrock: :hot: :bye: :X Oh please God no. Ryan is going to be nothing special and you can get the same player in Flacco or Brohm a round later. Please God, no. The only player the Bears should consider trading up for is Jake Long. Miami wants out of the first, we've got cap room to sign the no. 1 and picks in the third to compensate. GOD, IF YOU ARE OUT THERE, PLEASE DO NOT LET THE BEARS DRAFT RYAN.
I don't like any of the top QB's in this draft.
 
sholditch said:
Per KFFL:

Bears | Team considering trading up in draftMon, 21 Apr 2008 10:31:51 -0700Armando Salguero, of The Miami Herald, reports the Chicago Bears are seriously considering trading up in the 2008 NFL Draft to acquire Boston College QB Matt Ryan.
...but according to them, so are the Panthers and Lions.
:lmao: :hot: :wall: :X Oh please God no. Ryan is going to be nothing special and you can get the same player in Flacco or Brohm a round later. Please God, no. The only player the Bears should consider trading up for is Jake Long. Miami wants out of the first, we've got cap room to sign the no. 1 and picks in the third to compensate. GOD, IF YOU ARE OUT THERE, PLEASE DO NOT LET THE BEARS DRAFT RYAN.
I do not see picking Ryan a bad thing by itself but traded up to get him is just moronic. There will be options in the 2nd to go QB and get about the same value as Ryan. There is no reason to make this move if you are the Bears. There entire offense is in need for new players with the exception of TE, why would you give up picks to move up for a QB that is not head and shoulders better than what you can get in the 2nd? Makes no sense.
 
Spiderman said:
sholditch said:
Per KFFL:

Bears | Team considering trading up in draftMon, 21 Apr 2008 10:31:51 -0700Armando Salguero, of The Miami Herald, reports the Chicago Bears are seriously considering trading up in the 2008 NFL Draft to acquire Boston College QB Matt Ryan.
...but according to them, so are the Panthers and Lions.
:lmao: :hot: :wall: :X Oh please God no. Ryan is going to be nothing special and you can get the same player in Flacco or Brohm a round later. Please God, no. The only player the Bears should consider trading up for is Jake Long. Miami wants out of the first, we've got cap room to sign the no. 1 and picks in the third to compensate. GOD, IF YOU ARE OUT THERE, PLEASE DO NOT LET THE BEARS DRAFT RYAN.
I don't like any of the top QB's in this draft.
None of them, including Ryan, are first-round material. I honestly think that if any of them make themselves into anything special in the pros, it wll be either Flacco or one taken in the third or later. If all three were available I would take Flacco, then Brohm, then Ryan, and not a single one before round 2.
 
Spiderman said:
sholditch said:
Per KFFL:

Bears | Team considering trading up in draftMon, 21 Apr 2008 10:31:51 -0700Armando Salguero, of The Miami Herald, reports the Chicago Bears are seriously considering trading up in the 2008 NFL Draft to acquire Boston College QB Matt Ryan.
...but according to them, so are the Panthers and Lions.
:shrug: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Oh please God no. Ryan is going to be nothing special and you can get the same player in Flacco or Brohm a round later. Please God, no. The only player the Bears should consider trading up for is Jake Long. Miami wants out of the first, we've got cap room to sign the no. 1 and picks in the third to compensate. GOD, IF YOU ARE OUT THERE, PLEASE DO NOT LET THE BEARS DRAFT RYAN.
I don't like any of the top QB's in this draft.
None of them, including Ryan, are first-round material. I honestly think that if any of them make themselves into anything special in the pros, it wll be either Flacco or one taken in the third or later. If all three were available I would take Flacco, then Brohm, then Ryan, and not a single one before round 2.
Exactly. I think they have just as good a chance of striking gold with guys like Kevin O'Connell, Josh Johnson, or Dennis Dixon in the later rounds as they do taking someone like Brohm, Henne, or Flacco early. In the later rounds we have more protection because we're not breaking the bank on an unsure thing and we're not committed for too long. Don't use a Day One pick on a QB when you can have someone who grades out 5 points worse in the 5th round. Use the high picks on players that have more value.
 
Per KFFL:

Bears | Team considering trading up in draftMon, 21 Apr 2008 10:31:51 -0700Armando Salguero, of The Miami Herald, reports the Chicago Bears are seriously considering trading up in the 2008 NFL Draft to acquire Boston College QB Matt Ryan.
...but according to them, so are the Panthers and Lions.
Yuck. If anything, trade up in the second to assure yourself one of Brohm, Flacco or Henne.
 
Peter King seems to think Henne might go in rd 1...

"If Ryan is sitting there at six or seven, I expect Detroit, Carolina and Chicago to inquire about trading up.• The hot name as we enter the final five predraft days? Michigan quarterback Chad Henne. Two scouts I trust told me over the weekend they like him better than they like Ryan. There's a team somewhere between 8 and 17 -- and I can't figure out which one -- interested in trading down a few slots and drafting Henne with a first-round pick."
IMO The second part of this quote has Bears written all over it. There do not seem to be many teams in that range who would take a QB rd1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Peter King seems to think Henne might go in rd 1...

"If Ryan is sitting there at six or seven, I expect Detroit, Carolina and Chicago to inquire about trading up.• The hot name as we enter the final five predraft days? Michigan quarterback Chad Henne. Two scouts I trust told me over the weekend they like him better than they like Ryan. There's a team somewhere between 8 and 17 -- and I can't figure out which one -- interested in trading down a few slots and drafting Henne with a first-round pick."
IMO The second part of this quote has Bears written all over it. There do not seem to be many teams in that range who would take a QB rd1
This draft is so deep a O-line, I'd be ok with that. I like Flacco better, but whatever, as long as they get a qb.....
 
Peter King seems to think Henne might go in rd 1...

"If Ryan is sitting there at six or seven, I expect Detroit, Carolina and Chicago to inquire about trading up.• The hot name as we enter the final five predraft days? Michigan quarterback Chad Henne. Two scouts I trust told me over the weekend they like him better than they like Ryan. There's a team somewhere between 8 and 17 -- and I can't figure out which one -- interested in trading down a few slots and drafting Henne with a first-round pick."
IMO The second part of this quote has Bears written all over it. There do not seem to be many teams in that range who would take a QB rd1
This draft is so deep a O-line, I'd be ok with that. I like Flacco better, but whatever, as long as they get a qb.....
Not to mention we might get a late second or early third depending how far down we drop. I really like TB as a trade partner. 14 would be a nice spot for TB to add one of the top 3 RBs or the top WR on their board.
 
I see only 4 qbs in this draft that are worth drafting AT ALL. If we dont land one of those top 4 guys, Id rather not waste a pick on a qb this year.

Also think the 4 are extremely close and I really wouldnt mind getting any of them. Dont want to be trading up and giving up picks to do so though, so that pretty much rules Ryan out unless he miraculously falls. In the 2nd, Id be just fine with any of Brohm, Flacco or Henne (in that order)

 
I'm a big time Urlacher fan BUT... If the right deal comes along I'm all for it. Some sporting show in Chicago was starting rumors about Urlacher to Arizona for Boldin and a rd1 draft pick. Sadly I think this would be a nice deal for Chicago.
I would do that in a heartbeat. It's sad to say, but I would.
I would certainly do that. I can't imagine that the Cards would do that. Boldin is a much younger player and has the potential to be a Pro Bowler. Urlacher probably has three or four years at best. I can imagine them doing this and including a first round draft pick.
 
Per KFFL:

Bears | Team considering trading up in draftMon, 21 Apr 2008 10:31:51 -0700Armando Salguero, of The Miami Herald, reports the Chicago Bears are seriously considering trading up in the 2008 NFL Draft to acquire Boston College QB Matt Ryan.
...but according to them, so are the Panthers and Lions.
Yuck. If anything, trade up in the second to assure yourself one of Brohm, Flacco or Henne.
I agree. I don't think there is enough difference between Ryan and the other three to justify a steep price to move up.
 
They've been a losing franchise for the last 20 years,yet, they never seem to change things. While everyone else is using the FA market, what are they doing? Not a damn thing. Just the same old garbage with resigning their on players and drafting the rest. HEY BEARS! IT'S A DIFFERENT ERA NOW. IF YOU WANT TO COMPETE, YOU HAVE TO PLAY THE GAME EVERYONE IS PLAYING, NOT THE SAME OLD SONG YOU'VE BEEN SINGING SINCE FA BEGAN. GIVE IT UP ALREADY OR DO IT THE RIGHT WAY. YOU'RE NOT EVEN GOING TO TRY AND COMPETE.

I'm obviously very pissed off about the team's predicament and how the organization is sitting on their damn hands as usual. Do something different. This approach hasn't worked in 20 years you baffoons. :X

 
Last edited by a moderator:
They've been a losing franchise for the last 20 years,yet, they never seem to change things. While everyone else is using the FA market, what are they doing? Not a damn thing. Just the same old garbage with resigning their on players and drafting the rest. HEY BEARS! IT'S A DIFFERENT ERA NOW. IF YOU WANT TO COMPETE, YOU HAVE TO PLAY THE GAME EVERYONE IS PLAYING, NOT THE SAME OLD SONG YOU'VE BEEN SINGING SINCE FA BEGAN. GIVE IT UP ALREADY OR DO IT THE RIGHT WAY. YOU'RE NOT EVEN GOING TO TRY AND COMPETE. I'm obviously very pissed off about the team's predicament and how the organization is sitting on their damn hands as usual. Do something different. This approach hasn't worked in 20 years you baffoons. :wall:
Yea, pretty much.I am still in shock that we didnt sniff one of the young guards that were available this offseason. That one year we made the splash with TJ and Tait and it was successful. Friggin nothing since...
 
another clipping about the Bears and Henne in rd 1 :unsure:

04/21...Al's Draft Scoop...Draft Buzz...The latest buzz around the league has the Chicago Bears being very interested in Michigan quarterback Chad Henne...don't be surprised if the Bears move down a bit in the first round and make Henne their first round pick...the Bears organization fell in love with Henne during Senior Bowl week...out to Atlanta where I'm hearing it's a two man race for the Falcons pick at number three...the only two candidates that the Falcons are considering are LSU defensive tackle Glenn Dorsey and Boston College quarterback Matt Ryan...if the pick were up to Falcons' owner Arthur Blank, Matt Ryan would be wearing a Falcons uniform in 2008."
Maybe JA likes the value of some OL in rd2. I can't blame him. I dont think Baker or Nicks are much if any of a drop off from Otah or Williams.ETA: Because I am bored...lets talk possible teams interested in a trade up with Chicago. As I mentioned before I like TB moving up if a top RB is still available. Have to throw in ATL just because of the 2nd round ammo they have this season. Philly has been mentioned as wanting to move up. Maybe Sea, I'm not sure what they need, but being Holmgren's last season why not move up and get a playmaker.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Max Power said:
another clipping about the Bears and Henne in rd 1 :lmao:

04/21...Al's Draft Scoop...Draft Buzz...The latest buzz around the league has the Chicago Bears being very interested in Michigan quarterback Chad Henne...don't be surprised if the Bears move down a bit in the first round and make Henne their first round pick...the Bears organization fell in love with Henne during Senior Bowl week...out to Atlanta where I'm hearing it's a two man race for the Falcons pick at number three...the only two candidates that the Falcons are considering are LSU defensive tackle Glenn Dorsey and Boston College quarterback Matt Ryan...if the pick were up to Falcons' owner Arthur Blank, Matt Ryan would be wearing a Falcons uniform in 2008."
Maybe JA likes the value of some OL in rd2. I can't blame him. I dont think Baker or Nicks are much if any of a drop off from Otah or Williams.ETA: Because I am bored...lets talk possible teams interested in a trade up with Chicago. As I mentioned before I like TB moving up if a top RB is still available. Have to throw in ATL just because of the 2nd round ammo they have this season. Philly has been mentioned as wanting to move up. Maybe Sea, I'm not sure what they need, but being Holmgren's last season why not move up and get a playmaker.
Maybe a team like the Steelers? They need O-line help and they'd likely have a nice choice of Williams or Otah at 14.I'd prefer they take Flacco, but I could live with Henne.
 
How would Bears fans feel about this?

at 14 the Bears take the best available OT....Chris Williams, Otah, Clady.

Then they trade their second rounder and the late third rounder to move up and take Gosder Cherilus.

That would give them two very talented OT's.

Then they could take the Best Available...QB/RB with the early third round pick.

 
How would Bears fans feel about this?at 14 the Bears take the best available OT....Chris Williams, Otah, Clady.Then they trade their second rounder and the late third rounder to move up and take Gosder Cherilus.That would give them two very talented OT's.Then they could take the Best Available...QB/RB with the early third round pick.
Not bad, but I could see them doing this:Bears give #14 (1100 Pick value) to Dallas for #22 & #61 (1072 Pick Value)Bears grab Henne at 22 (which is too early IMO) and then use the 2nd's on a RB and OT.
 
That scenario is what I would like to see.

The Henne thing will be another disaster. How many times do we have to get burned by Michigan players? Anthony Thomas, David Terrell...it's got to end. Henne is not any more worth a first-round pick than he was four weeks ago. Stick with the 14 spot and draft best available OT. Then maybe use one of the thirds to move up in the second and get more help on the OL.

 
RexGrossman said:
They've been a losing franchise for the last 20 years,yet, they never seem to change things. While everyone else is using the FA market, what are they doing? Not a damn thing. Just the same old garbage with resigning their on players and drafting the rest. HEY BEARS! IT'S A DIFFERENT ERA NOW. IF YOU WANT TO COMPETE, YOU HAVE TO PLAY THE GAME EVERYONE IS PLAYING, NOT THE SAME OLD SONG YOU'VE BEEN SINGING SINCE FA BEGAN. GIVE IT UP ALREADY OR DO IT THE RIGHT WAY. YOU'RE NOT EVEN GOING TO TRY AND COMPETE. I'm obviously very pissed off about the team's predicament and how the organization is sitting on their damn hands as usual. Do something different. This approach hasn't worked in 20 years you baffoons. :thumbdown:
Bryan Cox, Thomas Smith, Phillip Daniels, John Tait, Blake Brockermeyer, Tom Carter, Edgar Bennett, Ricardo McDonald, Vinson Smith, Ruben Brown, Fred Miller, Ted Washington, Keith Traylor, Eddie Kennison, Ricky Manning Jr, and Kordell Stewart.These are all of the bigger time FA's that the Bears have brought in(that I could think of) in the modern salary cap era. How many of them panned out the way they were suppost to? Very few.
 
How would Bears fans feel about this?at 14 the Bears take the best available OT....Chris Williams, Otah, Clady.Then they trade their second rounder and the late third rounder to move up and take Gosder Cherilus.That would give them two very talented OT's.Then they could take the Best Available...QB/RB with the early third round pick.
Dont want to give up picks at all in this draft.
 
How would Bears fans feel about this?at 14 the Bears take the best available OT....Chris Williams, Otah, Clady.Then they trade their second rounder and the late third rounder to move up and take Gosder Cherilus.That would give them two very talented OT's.Then they could take the Best Available...QB/RB with the early third round pick.
Dont want to give up picks at all in this draft.
I understand that....but you reach a point of where you need QUALITY OL prospects instead of the late round ones they generally bring in....note Columbo did pan out....just a freak injury.I think drafting a WR or QB or RB...before obtaining three good OL prospects is a waste....we currently don't have a LG or RT(of note) and our RG is Garza(nothing to scream home about) Tait is an average LT.Do you want to throw these young skill position players to the wolves? See the Bears offense last season.Look at what great OL's can do for RB's....Denver(all of those 1000 yard RB's), the Redskins(portis gets hurt and Ladell Betts is awesome), Pittsburgh (Bettis was amazing and then an UDFA Willie Parker becomes one of the better RB's in the league, the Giants had success with 4 different RB's last season, the Vikings could run with Chester Taylor or ADP and be successful.OLINE IS THE MOST IMPORTANT GROUP ON OFFENSE....ask Brady if that mattered in the Super Bowl.
 
No kidding. Also, Thomas Jones was an FA that panned out really well, until we royally screwed that one by shipping him outta town, and Desmond Clark was a good signing as well. Also, I think Ricky Manning Jr. played great as a nickel corner.

 
IMO unless Clady or Albert are there at 14, there is no value at OL in rd1. The next 5 or so prospects all grade out nearly the same. Each team will have its favorite of the bunch. Personally I don't think any are worthy of 14. Might as well drop down and add another pick in the first 3 rounds. There are so many needs on this team right now.

The more I think about it, no way the Bears take Henne in RD1. How does that help this team get better? We would still have major OL/RB/WR problems. Yet now we would have a QB who will not see the field this season. Bears would have to admit they are now in total rebuilding mode.

 
I have seen him play some. I've also paid close attention to the conference he runs in for some time. Let's just say that accomplishments against the absolutely horrendous defenses in conference USA I view with some skepticism.

 
OK, I think this is the way I'd like to see the Bears draft go:

1. Best OL available. If there was a huge run at OL and there is not good value there (but there should be), I wouldn't mind a trade down to pick up more picks (we need them).

2. QB. Henne? Will he last? Flacco? Both Rex and Orton have one year deals. If either falters, the new QB has one year to pick up the offense. If either one works out, he can sit and learn more and provide 'competition' to the incumbent QB.

3a. WR. We need one and it takes a year or so for WRs to get a good grasp of the offense.

3b. Safety? Also a need. or an other OL.

Depending on who's available, maybe WR rounds 2 and a QB round 3?

I think the Bears can manage with Benson for another year, especially if the OLine improves. We still have Peterson and Wolfe. I say we hold off on RBs this year and wait for other decent players to drop to us while other teams scramble for RBs. If ther really is depth at the RB position this year (in the draft), then there will be more teams next year that will not be looking to fill that position. We can probably get good value at RB next year. Who will be the best prospects next year?

 
OK, I think this is the way I'd like to see the Bears draft go:

1. Best OL available. If there was a huge run at OL and there is not good value there (but there should be), I wouldn't mind a trade down to pick up more picks (we need them).

2. QB. Henne? Will he last? Flacco? Both Rex and Orton have one year deals. If either falters, the new QB has one year to pick up the offense. If either one works out, he can sit and learn more and provide 'competition' to the incumbent QB.

3a. WR. We need one and it takes a year or so for WRs to get a good grasp of the offense.

3b. Safety? Also a need. or an other OL.

Depending on who's available, maybe WR rounds 2 and a QB round 3?

I think the Bears can manage with Benson for another year, especially if the OLine improves. We still have Peterson and Wolfe. I say we hold off on RBs this year and wait for other decent players to drop to us while other teams scramble for RBs. If ther really is depth at the RB position this year (in the draft), then there will be more teams next year that will not be looking to fill that position. We can probably get good value at RB next year. Who will be the best prospects next year?
That's a big leap of faith....
 
OK, I think this is the way I'd like to see the Bears draft go:

1. Best OL available. If there was a huge run at OL and there is not good value there (but there should be), I wouldn't mind a trade down to pick up more picks (we need them).

2. QB. Henne? Will he last? Flacco? Both Rex and Orton have one year deals. If either falters, the new QB has one year to pick up the offense. If either one works out, he can sit and learn more and provide 'competition' to the incumbent QB.

3a. WR. We need one and it takes a year or so for WRs to get a good grasp of the offense.

3b. Safety? Also a need. or an other OL.

Depending on who's available, maybe WR rounds 2 and a QB round 3?

I think the Bears can manage with Benson for another year, especially if the OLine improves. We still have Peterson and Wolfe. I say we hold off on RBs this year and wait for other decent players to drop to us while other teams scramble for RBs. If ther really is depth at the RB position this year (in the draft), then there will be more teams next year that will not be looking to fill that position. We can probably get good value at RB next year. Who will be the best prospects next year?
I think, if they stay at #14, OL is going to be the pick. They may have their choice of Jeff Otah or Chris Williams, and, although both have questions, they both do fill an immediate hole at RT. I just hope they can step right in and contribute though it's probably unrealistic to expect consistent play right away. I would love to move down and get one of these guys in the low 20's, but they probably would only make that move if they were comfortable with who else may be around should one of these lineman not be.In the 2nd round, I think we're going to see a RB, and it will be either that round or the first pick in Round 3.

In the 3rd round, I would like to add another OL, but realize they may add a QB in this round so that will probably have to wait.

Defensively, don't look for too much help here. They may add another safety or DT in the draft, but I don't think anything gets added until at least Round 4.

Again, though, I would love to move down in the draft about 10 spots, pick up at least one more pick and just add as many young offensive players to this rebuilding process as possible.

 
OK, I think this is the way I'd like to see the Bears draft go:

1. Best OL available. If there was a huge run at OL and there is not good value there (but there should be), I wouldn't mind a trade down to pick up more picks (we need them).

2. QB. Henne? Will he last? Flacco? Both Rex and Orton have one year deals. If either falters, the new QB has one year to pick up the offense. If either one works out, he can sit and learn more and provide 'competition' to the incumbent QB.

3a. WR. We need one and it takes a year or so for WRs to get a good grasp of the offense.

3b. Safety? Also a need. or an other OL.

Depending on who's available, maybe WR rounds 2 and a QB round 3?

I think the Bears can manage with Benson for another year, especially if the OLine improves. We still have Peterson and Wolfe. I say we hold off on RBs this year and wait for other decent players to drop to us while other teams scramble for RBs. If ther really is depth at the RB position this year (in the draft), then there will be more teams next year that will not be looking to fill that position. We can probably get good value at RB next year. Who will be the best prospects next year?
That's a big leap of faith....
I think any RB can play better behind an improved line, but they need to bring in somebody to challenge Benson. We can't assume that the light is going to turn on because he doesn't look to be a game breaker, often falling on first contact, without any great moves, and now coming off a knee injury.
 
It'll never happen, but...

1 Mendenhall RB

2 Sam Baker OT

3 Jordy Nelson WR

3 Josh Johnson QB

4 Zuttah OG/OT

 
If Jake Long, Albert, Clady, Williams, and Otah are all gone at pick 14.

What should the Bears do?

Pick Mendenhall?

They could....but I would drop down to about 19(Eagles would love to move up to get a DE)

Stockpile some more picks....so they can draft more for need and address more holes on offense.

If they would then go with Mendenhall, then I would follow that with three straight Oline picks.

WR in the 4th.

Then get O'Connell in the 5th for a QB.

 
If Jake Long, Albert, Clady, Williams, and Otah are all gone at pick 14.

What should the Bears do?

Pick Mendenhall?

They could....but I would drop down to about 19(Eagles would love to move up to get a DE)

Stockpile some more picks....so they can draft more for need and address more holes on offense.

If they would then go with Mendenhall, then I would follow that with three straight Oline picks.

WR in the 4th.

Then get O'Connell in the 5th for a QB.
;) :popcorn: As if Jake Long ever had a chance of falling to 1.14, never mind he's been signed already

 
Alexander was just cut by Seattle. Maybe they sign him (or Kevin Jones?)?
You would think so but I'm afraid that just makes too much sense for the Bears. They wouldn't want to crush Ced's fragile ego by giving themselves a better chance to win games.
 
Alexander was just cut by Seattle. Maybe they sign him (or Kevin Jones?)?
I don't think Alexander has "it" anymore. He was a stud running behind one of the best lines in the NFL. Once Hutch left he was never the same force. I don't see the Bears showing much interest. On the other hand I am very high on Kevin Jones. I think he would bring so much to the table for this offense. Sure injuries are a concern, but hey we are rolling with Mike Brown again...I never did see if Musa Smith signed anywhere, I was very high on him when the off-season started. Put Musa in the right situation and you have yourself a 1,000 yard rusher.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top