[icon]
Insoxicated
Sorry been binging Dope Sick which is a true story
Oh hell... I could totally see how that would put you in that mindset. Our handling of Opioids was ####### insane.
Sorry been binging Dope Sick which is a true story
What is your take on the severity of the new variant?Personal Prediction:
Peak Delta Confirmed Infections was 190k/day in August.
My bet is we cross that by January 7th.
A lot of athletes opted for JJ vaccine which was already not as effective. Those that got the mRNA are passed 6 months. They all need booster shots. You aren’t vaccinated really against Delta or Omnicron at this point without the booster.I almost hesitate to bring this up, especially with the PSF Covid thread locked, but what should we infer from all of the in-team outbreaks in the NFL and other sports? If we assume that the vast majority of these athletes are vaccinated, that would suggest not just that there are breakthrough infections, but that vaccinated people are infecting other vaccinated people.
I can imagine certain posters will say this shows the vaccines are and always have been ####e, and hey, maybe that's the answer. It could also mean that Omicron really has achieved a level of vaccine breakthrough (although of course we don't know if all these infections even are from the new variant).
One factor I haven't heard discussed much: What if it reflects that many athletes got the one-shot J&J vax, so they are far more likely to get breakthroughs now? I can certainly see why that decision would have made sense; the messaging at the time was that all three vaccines provided roughly equal levels of protection, so I can imagine many athletes figured they were young and in excellent health, so why not do the minimum necessary to check the box.
Anyway, I'm mostly just noodling. I don't have any expertise in this stuff (but I would certainly love to hear what some of those who do have expertise think of my theory).
Let’s hope. But that isn’t helping my wife’s aunt who has been in the hospital (not covid) and basically unconscious since Sunday and is getting bare minimum attention due to covid overload.More and more keeps coming out that Omicron is less severe than Delta and generally leads to milder symptoms. I read 29% lower hospitalization rate than 2020 even when accounting for vaccination status. With the rapid pace it is spreading (the South Africa curve is insane to look at) this could be a blessing in disguise. Yes more will die, yes hospitals could become overwhelmed but it could be a real quick peak followed by a rapid decline. This could be the end of it at least I'm crossing my fingers it is.
Looks like my back of napkin math was correct if not conservative. TBH my original guess was going to be New Year's Day in two weeks.Personal Prediction:
Peak Delta Confirmed Infections was 190k/day in August.
My bet is we cross that by January 7th.
thanks, was just coming to post that
For those without a booster, the first line of defense is down: neutralizing antibodies aren’t going prevent infection nor transmission of Omicron. However, T-cells should still keep a lot of people out of the hospital.
Those with boosters will be most protected. That’s because boosters restimulate the immune system and increase the number of antibodies. The more antibodies we have, the more they can find the the limited landing spots on Omicron. This will decrease breakthrough cases and decrease transmission.
Boosters also generate a much broader level of immunity. In other words, boosters develop antibodies against more parts of the virus than the primary series. A lab study yesterday confirmed. The authors noted:
“The antibody response after boosting is fundamentally different than it was before. It's not just raising the level of the existing antibodies, it's doing a lot more than that. Calling the third shot a booster is oversimplifying.”
While I'm not doubting YLE just yet ... I am wondering how this can be, at least with mRNA boosters. mRNA vaccines make some of the body's cells specifically produce (initial strain?) SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins and then the immune system makes antibodies to attack those spike proteins.Boosters also generate a much broader level of immunity. In other words, boosters develop antibodies against more parts of the virus than the primary series. A lab study yesterday confirmed. The authors noted:
“The antibody response after boosting is fundamentally different than it was before. It's not just raising the level of the existing antibodies, it's doing a lot more than that. Calling the third shot a booster is oversimplifying.”
And even if Omicron is milder, greater transmissibility will likely trump that reduced virulence. Omicron is spreading so quickly that a small proportion of severe cases could still flood hospitals. To avert that scenario, the variant would need to be substantially milder than Delta—especially because hospitals are already at a breaking point. Two years of trauma have pushed droves of health-care workers, including many of the most experienced and committed, to quit their job. The remaining staff is ever more exhausted and demoralized, and “exceptionally high numbers” can’t work because they got breakthrough Delta infections and had to be separated from vulnerable patients, John Lowe told me. This pattern will only worsen as Omicron spreads, if the large clusters among South African health-care workers are any indication. “In the West, we’ve painted ourselves into a corner because most countries have huge Delta waves and most of them are stretched to the limit of their health-care systems,” Emma Hodcroft, an epidemiologist at the University of Bern, in Switzerland, told me. “What happens if those waves get even bigger with Omicron?”
The Omicron wave won’t completely topple America’s wall of immunity but will seep into its many cracks and weaknesses. It will find the 39 percent of Americans who are still not fully vaccinated (including 28 percent of adults and 13 percent of over-65s). It will find other biologically vulnerable people, including elderly and immunocompromised individuals whose immune systems weren’t sufficiently girded by the vaccines. It will find the socially vulnerable people who face repeated exposures, either because their “essential” jobs leave them with no choice or because they live in epidemic-prone settings, such as prisons and nursing homes. Omicron is poised to speedily recap all the inequities that the U.S. has experienced in the pandemic thus far.
Here, then, is the problem: People who are unlikely to be hospitalized by Omicron might still feel reasonably protected, but they can spread the virus to those who are more vulnerable, quickly enough to seriously batter an already collapsing health-care system that will then struggle to care for anyone—vaccinated, boosted, or otherwise. The collective threat is substantially greater than the individual one. And the U.S. is ill-poised to meet it.
.
.
.
Vaccines can’t be the only strategy, either. The rest of the pandemic playbook remains unchanged and necessary: paid sick leave and other policies that protect essential workers, better masks, improved ventilation, rapid tests, places where sick people can easily isolate, social distancing, a stronger public-health system, and ways of retaining the frayed health-care workforce. The U.S. has consistently dropped the ball on many of these, betting that vaccines alone could get us out of the pandemic. Rather than trying to beat the coronavirus one booster at a time, the country needs to do what it has always needed to do—build systems and enact policies that protect the health of entire communities, especially the most vulnerable ones. Individualism couldn’t beat Delta, it won’t beat Omicron, and it won’t beat the rest of the Greek alphabet to come. Self-interest is self-defeating, and as long as its hosts ignore that lesson, the virus will keep teaching it.
While I'm not doubting YLE just yet ... I am wondering how this can be, at least with mRNA boosters. mRNA vaccines make some of the body's cells specifically produce (initial strain?) SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins and then the immune system makes antibodies to attack those spike proteins.
How does another shot of an mRNA vaccine, then, elicit antibodies that target other parts of the virus besides the spike protein? Have the mRNA vaccine's actions been inaccurately described or oversimplified in laymen-level literature? There's a missing piece of the puzzle here.
I'd assume the latter. I tried to follow her link to read what she was quoting (that wasn't her quote, it was the study author) and see if it had any further details, but she linked to the wrong page.While I'm not doubting YLE just yet ... I am wondering how this can be, at least with mRNA boosters. mRNA vaccines make some of the body's cells specifically produce (initial strain?) SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins and then the immune system makes antibodies to attack those spike proteins.
How does another shot of an mRNA vaccine, then, elicit antibodies that target other parts of the virus besides the spike protein? Have the mRNA vaccine's actions been inaccurately described or oversimplified in laymen-level literature? There's a missing piece of the puzzle here.
Maybe she flubbed the explanation a bit.The mRNA vaccine creates the spike protein. The body makes the antibodies, and those antibodies could differ regarding which part of the spike protein they were created to attach to. It makes sense that your body would make different ways to attack something, especially if you already have antibodies in your system.
As far as signs on business doors go, I don't go by those signs anymore. Throughout 2021, signs have gone up, come down, and gone back up again. And the signs you do see don't always say the same thing (everything from "Mask or Leave! Fight Me!" to "Wearing a mask would be really cool ... if you want ... no pressure.").the messaging is all over the place.
Maybe she flubbed the explanation a bit.
If Dr. Jetelina had written that the antibodies can "learn" to attack the spike protein in different ways (e.g. some attack on the north side, some on the south, a few will try the east, etc.) ... then that would make sense. The spike protein is three-dimensional and has several (or even many?) "latch points" -- maybe one latch point is the easiest to "grab" and so most antibodies will get to that point first. But given time and increasing numbers of antibodies, more and more antibodies will grab other latch points, where it gets to the point where it doesn't matter if 70% of the antibodies grab for the same easy latch point because there are enough in that remaining 30% to go after other latch points.
I still don't understand how the mRNA vaccines can elicit antibodies against a part of the SARS-CoV-2 virion that the immune system has never seen (e.g. the capsule, or the RNA itself). But I'm willing to learn.
She quoted directly from Balazs Labs Twitter account, but erroneously inked to their website's home page.I'd assume the latter. I tried to follow her link to read what she was quoting (that wasn't her quote, it was the study author) and see if it had any further details, but she linked to the wrong page.
That explains it well, thanks. She writes:I think this post of hers may help.
https://yourlocalepidemiologist.substack.com/p/go-get-your-vaccine-especially-with
First line of defense- Antibodies
Vaccines induce something called a “polyclonal response”. Basically, the vaccine instructs the body to generate numerous shaped antibodies that can connect to many different parts of the virus (see picture). Those antibodies are diverse in shape and cover the whole waterfront of the spike protein.
Mutations to those target sites raise the possibility that the vaccines would be less effective, not necessary that they won’t work at all. Some antibodies may not attach, some antibodies may not attach as tightly, but others will. We saw this with Beta (another Variant of Concern). There were far less places for the neutralizing antibodies to attach, but some still did.
Omicron has some of the same mutations as Beta and more. Even so, we hypothesize that there is still space for these antibodies to attach. That’s because of evolution competition. For the virus to survive, it has to change enough to outsmart our vaccines but cannot change enough where the virus’s key doesn’t fit at all. If the virus is still using the same door with Omicron (ACE2 receptors), then our antibodies can probably still recognize parts of that key.
Its gonna be really hard (impossible) to convince any remaining unvaxxed people to get vaxxed when all the reports about Omicron state that it evades vaccine immunity.
Is it understood that vaccine immunity is not a pass/fail thing? The YLE piece to which Dragons just linked is gold.Its gonna be really hard (impossible) to convince any remaining unvaxxed people to get vaxxed when all the reports about Omicron state that it evades vaccine immunity.
Echoing what @[icon]said above, those that remain unvaccinated are probably not getting vaccinated regardless of the message. I look at them as the hardcore holdouts and as mentioned, good luck. This will work itself out one way or the other. She might not have started it but Mother Nature is undefeated, she'll sort this out for us.Its gonna be really hard (impossible) to convince any remaining unvaxxed people to get vaxxed when all the reports about Omicron state that it evades vaccine immunity.
Yeah, if they haven't been convinced by now, nothing's going to convince them. Tons of reports out there that symptoms are mild at worst for those vaxxed in terms of Omicron. I guess they don't understand that's not the case for the unvaxxed. That sort of mental disconnect can't be fixed.Its gonna be really hard (impossible) to convince any remaining unvaxxed people to get vaxxed when all the reports about Omicron state that it evades vaccine immunity.
At this point if they haven't been convinced, they likely won't be. Not really our problem at this point.
If they want to play chicken with this thing.. knock themselves out. Free country.
If they want to spread anti-vax misinformation, however, I won't feel bad when they end up on HermanCainAward and hopefully serve as a lesson to others.
The issue when covid becomes endemic may be waning performance of immune response. Let's hope that the memory T-cells or whatever can mount an effective attack without a crap ton of active antibodies coursing through us.Good news/bad news that I just saw:
Omnicron may be appearing as mild in South Africa due to vaccination and prior infection. That is bad news for the unvaccinated because they still can get severely ill, and the "mild strain" headlines may have dissuaded people.
The good news is that this lends COVID to becoming endemic once we have more vaccine and infection antibodies in the population. So that this really can become like a flu season thing.
See the article I posted above. Hospitalizations are 29% lower in South Africa even when accounting for vaccinations. It seems like this is a milder variant overall because of how fast it replicates in the airways.Yeah, if they haven't been convinced by now, nothing's going to convince them. Tons of reports out there that symptoms are mild at worst for those vaxxed in terms of Omicron. I guess they don't understand that's not the case for the unvaxxed. That sort of mental disconnect can't be fixed.
Yeah, if they haven't been convinced by now, nothing's going to convince them. Tons of reports out there that symptoms are mild at worst for those vaxxed in terms of Omicron. I guess they don't understand that's not the case for the unvaxxed. That sort of mental disconnect can't be fixed.
This is pure supposition and wishful thinking IMO. The data is not anywhere near compete on this topic.See the article I posted above. Hospitalizations are 29% lower in South Africa even when accounting for vaccinations. It seems like this is a milder variant overall because of how fast it replicates in the airways.
There is definitely good news and bad news in the article I posted.This is pure supposition and wishful thinking IMO. The data is not anywhere near compete on this topic.
In that YLE article, this is the part that stood out to me: "Case counts are going to get very high. As high as our testing capacity can take."
The thought of cases being so high that it outstrips testing capacity is extremely troubling to me.
This is pure supposition and wishful thinking IMO. The data is not anywhere near compete on this topic.
In that YLE article, this is the part that stood out to me: "Case counts are going to get very high. As high as our testing capacity can take."
The thought of cases being so high that it outstrips testing capacity is extremely troubling to me.
Seems simple but...don't goFor the first time in the pandemic, I'm not confident I'll be able to avoid infection... but I'm still going to try. AND.... I'll be damned if I don't do everything I can to avoid passing it along if I get it.
Assume we will be getting vaccines every 6-18 months for a while.The issue when covid becomes endemic may be waning performance of immune response. Let's hope that the memory T-cells or whatever can mount an effective attack without a crap ton of active antibodies coursing through us.
I'm starting to wonder "Is there any good reason not to sanction quarterly booster shots for the duration?"Assume we will be getting vaccines every 6-18 months for a while.
I'm well beyond it....it's like that story of people dying, going to heaven and asking God why he didn't save them from the flood and his reply being "well, I tried sending you a life boat three different times".Only gonna spend so long staying behind trying to pull someone resisting being pulled out of a burning car before it's time to skedaddle and let nature take it's course.
Currently sitting on 16 At Home Tests (8x 2pks).
Using 2 for the GF and I before travel to FL. Bringing enough to test the whole family (3 kits for Mom/Dad/Bro/SIL/2Nieces) and will have another kit for in a pinch.
We will be scheduling a PCR again the morning of our NYE gathering (5 couples - House "Party" dinner) where everyone will be tested the morning of.
For the first time in the pandemic, I'm not confident I'll be able to avoid infection... but I'm still going to try. AND.... I'll be damned if I don't do everything I can to avoid passing it along if I get it.
Makes sense. He claims to be an actuary as well, yet has no clue about variance.Yet you don't understand the article
My comment should read "doesn't automatically mean the same thing for unvaccinated"....either way, I'm hopeful this thing is the sharpest of peaks because this country has demonstrated they can't do the right things. So this needs to come and go on it's own as quickly as possible.See the article I posted above. Hospitalizations are 29% lower in South Africa even when accounting for vaccinations. It seems like this is a milder variant overall because of how fast it replicates in the airways.
Seems like that’s a pretty hit topic atm. Historically most viruses weaken as they mutate. But it seems like most public health orgs want to downplay the mild symptoms that often present.What is your take on the severity of the new variant?
The BinaxNOW test from Abbot is the only kind I ever see on sale around here. I've administered about a half dozen tests from home for my wife and son. Pretty easy to use and more accurate than commonly though IF a person has symptoms.What home test kits do you guys suggest?
This is what I just used and result confirmed with a PRC test. Have no idea if it's a good test or not, was cheap and got it in 2 days.What home test kits do you guys suggest?
Do you mean they're running a trial on an entirely new RNA packet? Basically, a new mRNA vaccine tailored to Omicron?Has anyone found the Moderna Trial data for 50mcg / 100mcg / New Shot vs Omicron? I know they started this a couple weeks ago.
You don't work for Sunbelt do you? Very similar numbers for us.Live/work in North East WI. Last year masking required at work, this spring they said mask optional if vaccinated. All on honor system as they didn't want to press the issue. Anyhow, maybe noticed a handful of people still wearing mask out of say 100 people. Fast forward to this fall and we start to have 10-15 people per week out due to COVID or close contacts. They have now reinstated required mask wearing except when eating/drinking or in closed office. Last year it was minimal impact, I know many believe mask don't work but I think if they didn't require mask last year the results would've been like this. Oh year, when the vaccine mandate info came out they asked people to upload their vaccination status in Kronos. About a week ago HR reported only 35% of our workforce is vaccinated. I thought it would be around 50%, I knew many unvaccinated not wearing mask when they "should" but find it funny leadership hasn't made more of a deal of how many people were violating the "honor policy" when that is one of our companies core values and I know many managers were violating this...When they got the statics they let everyone know that the mask policy would remain in effect until we are at least 60% vaccinated, more in line with the county averages we draw our workforce from.