What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

"Official" Donald Trump for President: Great Wall of Mexico (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Amy Andelora@andelorable 9h9 hours ago

For decades the right wing has said abortion is murder. Trump's mistake: He took them at their word. @joanwalsh @hardball_chris
Yeah, I was a little surprised by the backlash from anti-abortion folks to his claim that the woman should be punished.  As this tweet points out, for decades we've been told that abortion = murder; that killing a fetus was no different than stabbing a baby in her crib.  We've seen memes on facebook comparing abortion fatalities to people killed in wars, traffic accidents or from gun violence.  By that logic the doctor is the hit man and the mother the one that hires him.  Why wouldn't both get punished?  It's almost as if they don't really believe abortion and murder are the same thing.  You can't blame Trump for not knowing that, being that he's new to this position. 

 
Yeah, I was a little surprised by the backlash from anti-abortion folks to his claim that the woman should be punished.  As this tweet points out, for decades we've been told that abortion = murder; that killing a fetus was no different than stabbing a baby in her crib.  We've seen memes on facebook comparing abortion fatalities to people killed in wars, traffic accidents or from gun violence.  By that logic the doctor is the hit man and the mother the one that hires him.  Why wouldn't both get punished?  It's almost as if they don't really believe abortion and murder are the same thing.  You can't blame Trump for not knowing that, being that he's new to this position. 
I agree. The statement from March For Life seemed to present it almost in the light of a drug case. The mother is like the drug user and doctor like the drug dealer. They see it as any woman that aborts her baby is a woman in need of emotional and moral support not  a woman in need of punishment. Why that changes once the baby is born, I am not sure. 

 
Yeah, I was a little surprised by the backlash from anti-abortion folks to his claim that the woman should be punished.  As this tweet points out, for decades we've been told that abortion = murder; that killing a fetus was no different than stabbing a baby in her crib.  We've seen memes on facebook comparing abortion fatalities to people killed in wars, traffic accidents or from gun violence.  By that logic the doctor is the hit man and the mother the one that hires him.  Why wouldn't both get punished?  It's almost as if they don't really believe abortion and murder are the same thing.  You can't blame Trump for not knowing that, being that he's new to this position. 
The logic is sound. So why did Donald do a real-time flip-flop? Because he's a social media, current events, candidate. His knowledge is a mile-wide and an inch deep on so many topics.

 
Do you have a link with evidence of this? The video in Higgs' post and the other videos I have seen of the encounter show the papers in his hand lightly brushing against her but it doesn't appear that he touches her chest with his hands.
He had no business even doing that.

 
It's pretty incredible that someone can:

A) Be on record multiple times over the past 20 years as being incredibly Pro-Choice

B) Apparently change to being Pro-Life without any explanation behind the change at all

C) Continue to support Planned Parenthood over and over again very loudly

D) Support a stance so extreme that the vast majority of Pro-Lifers find it disgustingly horrible and immediately denounce it.

The insane thing is that it's most likely just another case of Trump mangling a conservative position to the point of making it caricature and awful because he is talking off the top of his head and doesn't believe a word of what he is saying. 

If Cruz has any brains, he'll immediately start running ads in Pennsylvania blur country with Trump saying this and label him as an extremist. 

 
Yeah, I was a little surprised by the backlash from anti-abortion folks to his claim that the woman should be punished.  As this tweet points out, for decades we've been told that abortion = murder; that killing a fetus was no different than stabbing a baby in her crib.  We've seen memes on facebook comparing abortion fatalities to people killed in wars, traffic accidents or from gun violence.  By that logic the doctor is the hit man and the mother the one that hires him.  Why wouldn't both get punished?  It's almost as if they don't really believe abortion and murder are the same thing.  You can't blame Trump for not knowing that, being that he's new to this position. 
This is the very good thing that is likely to happen from Trump's run.  Whatever else happens, it's time that fiscal conservatives, evangelicals, and people who shout about what they think the Constitution says all realize that the other groups and the politicians representing all of them just don't give a #### about their actual positions. 

The Republican Party doesn't believe abortion is murder.  It just puts that forward to get votes.  The Republican Party doesn't think protestors interfere with free speech.  It just parrots that to get votes. Etc.  I think the Trump campaign is making that abundantly clear to everyone.

 
I hate that the "social conservatives" have aided and abetted in the destructive co-opting of the former meaning of the word "conservative".  Of course language appropriation has been a powerful tool for some time.

Perhaps there is irony in the demographic that for a time argued that any change in the meaning of the word marriage was some sort of heresy so actively, if unwittingly (I think of much that they do as unwitting) participating in the destruction of the meaning of a conservative.  In the end, no matter, one has to remain fluid, even if language shift is, in the end, a waste of time.  Some active advocates believe if they can co-opt terms they can do so also with principles, though in my experience that does not work and only addresses the symptoms, but not the disease. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.nytimes.com/1983/04/02/business/us-raises-tariff-for-motorcycles.html

In an unusually strong protectionist action, President Reagan today ordered a tenfold increase in tariffs for imported heavyweight motorycles.

The impact of Mr. Reagan's action, which followed the unanimous recommendation of his trade advisers, is effectively limited to Japanese manufacturers, which dominate every sector of the American motorycycle market.

The action was exceptional for protecting a single American company, the Harley-Davidson Motor Company of Milwaukee, the sole surviving American maker of motorcycles.

 
I wouldn't call that groping. I do, however, see a man in his 50s putting his hands on the chest of a teenage girl and getting in her face. He also got in the face of another clearly teenaged girl before that. According to you, that behavior is justification for getting punched in the face, right? Getting in someone's face and being obnoxious? Considering the age and gender of the recipient of such behavior, I would imagine several punches, perhaps?
Oh come on.  He do]isn't put his hands on her chest and you know it. He had a rolled up piece of paper that he was pointing at her with and the paper may have slightly touched the area right above her boobs below her neck.  Was it bad form for an older man?  Maybe.  Was it touching her chest, groping, or sexual assault?  Maybe on Planet Liberal but not here.

 
You Trump guys, we forgive you. Go ahead and concede this was an exciting lark for a while, he talked big and made us all laugh and certainly turned this into an interesting election season. But in the end we can all see what this was. We all know Trump being elected president is about as likely as me being named archbishop of Saudi Arabia. Given these recent gaffes, maybe it's true that he didn't want it at all. That's as good an explanation for his bizarre statements as any. But nonetheless, let's now begin the process of healing and put this nonsense behind us. For the good of the country, and the FFA. I'll say it again -- I believe in you! :thumbup:

 
This is the funniest post of yours yet

" Ex-Breitbart reporter Michelle Fields said Wednesday she had temporarily moved out of her D.C.-area apartment over safety concerns after Fox News and BuzzFeed accidentally published her address online. "

It's Donald Trumps fault that Fox News and BuzzFeed accidentally posted her address? Anymore post like these and I'll be putting you on ignore.

 
You Trump guys, we forgive you. Go ahead and concede this was an exciting lark for a while, he talked big and made us all laugh and certainly turned this into an interesting election season. But in the end we can all see what this was. We all know Trump being elected president is about as likely as me being named archbishop of Saudi Arabia. Given these recent gaffes, maybe it's true that he didn't want it at all. That's as good an explanation for his bizarre statements as any. But nonetheless, let's now begin the process of healing and put this nonsense behind us. For the good of the country, and the FFA. I'll say it again -- I believe in you! :thumbup:
Let me sleep on it and see if my dreams tell me anything.

 
http://www.nytimes.com/1983/04/02/business/us-raises-tariff-for-motorcycles.html

In an unusually strong protectionist action, President Reagan today ordered a tenfold increase in tariffs for imported heavyweight motorycles.

The impact of Mr. Reagan's action, which followed the unanimous recommendation of his trade advisers, is effectively limited to Japanese manufacturers, which dominate every sector of the American motorycycle market.

The action was exceptional for protecting a single American company, the Harley-Davidson Motor Company of Milwaukee, the sole surviving American maker of motorcycles.
You really want to go there?

Reagan's hypocritical rhetoric and actions on free trade vs. protectionism.

 
http://nationalinterest.org/feature/the-trump-doctrine-peace-through-strength-15631

Those who insist Donald Trump has no foreign policy are simply not listening. The “Trump Doctrine” is a page right out of Ronald Reagan’s playbook: peace through economic and military strength.

Trump knows the key to keeping America safe in an increasingly dangerous world is to “make America great again” through economic renewal. America must have the fiscal firepower to end Pentagon’s budget sequestration in order to fund the military the U.S. needs for adequate defense. Cutting the corporate tax rate and cracking down on unfair trade practices to increase America’s GDP growth rate are just as demonstrative of national might as the F-35. Here is how President Trump would use a newly empowered economy and military confront our rivals abroad:

Defeating Daesh

The best way to kill ISIS is to cut off its own financial head in two ways: first, target any oil fields that it may be using as a cash register and “follow the money” through the Internet and expropriate it. Trump is probably aware of Nietzsche’s admonition to beware that “when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster.” Trump also knows that when you are facing an enemy willing to bomb your sons and daughters and behead prisoners, you must strike equal fear into the heart of that enemy. Under a Trump Administration, no ISIS member will be safe, the cells of Guantanamo will be fuller, and America will be safer.

Overturning the Iran Nuclear Deal

Trump believes, as the strange bedfellows of Saudi Arabia and Israel are wont to do, that the Obama administration has made a terrible deal with Iran. Removing sanctions will allow this fascist, terrorist state to restore it economy and continue to develop capabilities to deliver nuclear warheads as near as Riyadh and Tel Aviv and as far away as Brussels and New York. President Trump will abrogate that deal the day he takes office. As commander in chief, he will exert both economic and military pressure on Saudi Arabia, our quasi-enemy that has pledged to destroy Israel and dreams of ruling a new Middle Eastern caliphate. As far as Israel is concerned, however, Trump appears to regards this democratic state as America’s most important ally in the Middle East. But Trump, along with most Americans, disagrees with hardliners who insist there can be no deal brokered between Israel and the Palestinians. A deal is possible, but you cannot have peace unless you are willing to negotiate.

From Russia, With Revanchism

Trump recognizes Vladimir Putin for the clever, ruthless, charismatic leader that he is. Putin has run strategic circles around both America and its NATO allies when it comes to Russia’s military intervention in Crimea, Ukraine, Syria, and former Socialist Republics like Georgia and Latvia.

Putin recognizes Trump as a strong and fearless leader who will draw clear red lines in Europe and the Middle East that Putin dare not cross. This is a far better and safer situation for America than a status quo Russia policy that leads from behind and inspires far more contempt from Putin than respect.

China’s Rising Phoenix

Trump will no longer tolerate a mercantilist China having its way with America’s factories and jobs. He will firmly crack down on unfair trade practices like illegal export subsidies, currency manipulation, and intellectual property theft and bring American jobs and factories home.

That’s not just good trade policy—it’s good foreign policy, too. China’s rapidly advancing military strength has been its ability to economically grow much faster than its strategic rivals. In other words, by rebalancing trade between the US and China, Trump will also rebalance the military equation in America’s favor.

Sharing the Burden of Defense

Trump has made headlines about revamping America’s alliances—from NATO to our allies in Asia. Trump knows the problem here is not that these alliances are not useful to the defense of the American homeland. Rather, Trump is tired of the U.S. having to pay the lion’s share of the bill to protect wealthier nations unwilling to spend the requisite funds to defend their own homelands. Consider that while the U.S. spends fully 3.5 percent of its GDP on defense, Japan is at a measly 1.0 percent, Germany is at 1.1 percent, and even South Korea, with an absolute madman on its border contributes a measly 2.6 percent. As president, Trump will demand a better deal for American taxpayers.

Trump’s “Distributed Network” of Advisors

In laying out his Trump Doctrine, Trump has assiduously avoided surrounding himself with a large circle of advisors. He has done so because he has “off the record” access to a broad distributed network of experts around the world—as well as an inner circle that stays out of the limelight. From his own detailed foreign policy research over many years—required due diligence to conduct business globally—Trump has developed a strong aversion to the kind of “nation building” that dragged America into wasted and protracted wars in God-forsaken killing fields like Iraq and Afghanistan. Accordingly, Trump has promised the American people – he will not be shedding the blood of any American soldier either in vain or under the vanity banner of American Exceptionalism. This is how Trump is in tune with the American public that is both tired of war and ready for the new era of prosperity that will usher in peace founded on true American power.

 
Latest NY poll has Trump winning there by 20. If those numbers hold up, he's going to be the nominee, no matter what happens in Wisconsin. IMO. 

 
Amy Andelora@andelorable 9h9 hours ago

For decades the right wing has said abortion is murder. Trump's mistake: He took them at their word. @joanwalsh @hardball_chris
Yeah, this.  I still don't get how this is a thing.  He was asked a hypothetical question that assumes abortion is illegal.  He answered that for women having an abortion, there should be some sort of penalty.  If abortion becomes illegal it's because it means it's murder.  And if it's murder, the woman who is consenting to the procedure is complicit in it.  There's no possible way of getting around this.  Personally I don't care what the prevailing Conservative wisdom has been in this space regarding this hypothetical.  So dumb that this is an issue.

i'll agree that there is an issue with Trump not answering the question well.  He should have said he's not engaging in hypotheticals like that and stuck to his guns.  And then the backtracking later made it worse.  Not good for a guy who wants to be President and a huge red flag.

 
Latest NY poll has Trump winning there by 20. If those numbers hold up, he's going to be the nominee, no matter what happens in Wisconsin. IMO. 
Can't see how Cruz could ever win NY after what he said. Probably one of the dumbest moments in this election.

 
The biggest takeaway an honest person would get from this Michelle Fields scam is that Trump doesn't cave under pressure, and he will always do the right thing even when it would be easier to just fire the guy and move on. That shows Trump has tremendous character.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, this.  I still don't get how this is a thing.  He was asked a hypothetical question that assumes abortion is illegal.  He answered that for women having an abortion, there should be some sort of penalty.  If abortion becomes illegal it's because it means it's murder.  And if it's murder, the woman who is consenting to the procedure is complicit in it.  There's no possible way of getting around this.  Personally I don't care what the prevailing Conservative wisdom has been in this space regarding this hypothetical.  So dumb that this is an issue.

i'll agree that there is an issue with Trump not answering the question well.  He should have said he's not engaging in hypotheticals like that and stuck to his guns.  And then the backtracking later made it worse.  Not good for a guy who wants to be President and a huge red flag.
Because, even for pro-lifers, the party line is that the doctors would be the ones paying the penalties. In a bizzaro world where women would have this right to make their own decisions regarding their bodies taken away, no one in their right mind is going to also add the part about them going to jail if they feel the need to get one.

Since I consider abortion an issue that's mostly irrelevant because they will never reverse the law on it, I'm not that concerned about Trump's guffaw.  What concerns me is how unprepared he has looked over the past couple of weeks. He's really starting to crack under the pressure and every day he is saying or tweeting things that would have destroyed the career of any other politician. This guy is in so far over his head that it's really hard to believe this isn't an episode of Punk'd or something. I'm just waiting for his supporters to wake up and realize it was a fun little experiment, but enough is enough.

 
One of the most amusing (and frankly, shameful) aspects of the Trump candidacy are these attempts by certain pro-Trump "experts" to provide larger, well thought themes for his incoherence on a variety of issues. If Trump were to read this article no doubt he would begin by having no clue as to what the author was referring to and end with saying, "Yeah, that was EXACTLY what I meant." 

 
The biggest takeaway an honest person would get from this Michelle Fields scam is that Trump doesn't cave under pressure, and he will always do the right thing even when it would be easier to just fire the guy and move on. That shows Trump has tremendous character.
That's so cool that you can get stoned in the middle of a weekday. 

 
That's so cool that you can get stoned in the middle of a weekday. 
I need to stop thinking about this idiot so much. Had a pretty bad nightmare last night that he was president and suspended the constitution. I was labeled an Enemy of the State for stuff I posted here, and these guys in black outfits surrounded my house. They looked like ninjas. One of them broke through a window and that's when I woke up, heart racing. No schtick.

 
That's it, I'm out.  I'm off the Trump train. 

I see our government as broken.  Between pandering to the extremist in both parties, obstructionism and do-nothingness in congress, and economic stagnation in the middle class, I looked at Trump's campaign as a sort of peaceful civil war.  He's an outsider that is not afraid to take on all-comers.  Someone that may have been able to use the leverage granted him as POTUS to reach across the aisle (just think, not long ago this was on both the Dems and Reps basic platform) and start to press congress to govern based on the good of their constituents and not their party.  I wish someone more qualified, or more third party'ish would have taken up this torch, but as my dad always says, "sometimes you have to piss with the peter you got".

Because of all this, I was willing to overlook many of the gaffes he's made by chalking them up to inexperience and lack of polish.  I didn't care if he didn't understood many of the things we expect our President to know because, as an outsider, there was going to need to be some on the job training. 

The real shame is that I think he had the primary, and maybe even the general, locked up after Super Tuesday.  His news conference that night was brilliant.  He was in control, professional, and presidential.  All he had to do was take the high road to the white house.  He couldn't do it. He didn't even try to do it. 

He didn't study up on basic issues.  He didn't stop re-tweeting ignorant information.  He continued personal attacks on Cruz and his wife.  All unacceptable.  He's lost me.

I'm assuming he has little chance to win the nomination now.  Therefore, the question becomes, is all of this just going to be swept under the rug by the republican party, or will its leaders start to understand the issues that made Donald so popular.

Immigration - Immigration reform is way over-do.  Regardless of the final bill, as long as it shores up the border, I don't see how it won't pass.

Middle Class - Trade, taxes, education, etc., etc., etc., as they relate to the middle class need to be brought to the forefront.  I'm a strong believer that this country works best when there's a strong middle class.  Both parties will say it, but neither will act on it.  Its all about the (middle class) economy stupid!

Military Inventions - I'm growing increasingly tired of my tax dollars being spent on policing the world when our infrastructure and education system are in shambles. 

Campaign Finance - Corporate campaign financing and the potential corruption it causes has to be addressed.  I'm feeling the bern on this one.

My vote will be cast on April 26th in PA.  Since its a closed primary, I can only vote republican.  Therefore, I'll probably pull the lever for Kasich as Cruz is too conservative for my liking.  Quite honestly, if I could vote for the democratic ticket, I'd probably vote for Bernie as a vote against Hilary.  To me, she represents all that is bad in governments today.

Now, I'm still on the platform and the train hasn't left.  I can be won back, but he's going to have to earn it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The biggest takeaway an honest person would get from this Michelle Fields scam is that Trump doesn't cave under pressure
He caved on the Muslim ban. He caved on forcing the military to follow illegal orders. He caved on H-1B visas. He caved on disavowing David Duke.

Oh, and he caved on his abortion comment about 30 seconds after he made it.

 
Don't think it's as important as you believe it to be, because Trump has the skills required to make his opponents look even worse than he does. In a head to head Trump will keep pummeling whoever it is until they beg for mercy.
You don't think it's important that every group of voters views Trump as unfavorable?

 
He caved on the Muslim ban. He caved on forcing the military to follow illegal orders. He caved on H-1B visas. He caved on disavowing David Duke.

Oh, and he caved on his abortion comment about 30 seconds after he made it.
No, his position was taken out of context and he clarified it.

 
That's it, I'm out.  I'm off the Trump train. 

I see our government as broken.  Between pandering to the extremist in both parties, obstructionism and do-nothingness in congress, and economic stagnation in the middle class, I looked at Trump's campaign as a sort of peaceful civil war.  He's an outsider that is not afraid to take on all-comers.  Someone that may have been able to use the leverage granted him as POTUS to reach across the aisle (just think, not long ago this was on both the Dems and Reps basic platform) and start to press congress to govern based on the good of their constituents and not their party.  I wish someone more qualified, or more third party'ish would have taken up this torch, but as my dad always says, "sometimes you have to piss with the peter you got".

Because of all this, I was willing to overlook many of the gaffes he's made by chalking them up to inexperience and lack of polish.  I didn't care if he didn't understood many of the things we expect our President to know because, as an outsider, there was going to need to be some on the job training. 

The real shame is that I think he had the primary, and maybe even the general, locked up after Super Tuesday.  His news conference that night was brilliant.  He was in control, professional, and presidential.  All he had to do was take the high road to the white house.  He couldn't do it. He didn't even try to do it. 

He didn't study up on basic issues.  He didn't stop re-tweeting ignorant information.  He continued personal attacks on Cruz and his wife.  All unacceptable.  He's lost me.

I'm assuming he has little chance to win the nomination now.  Therefore, the question becomes, is all of this just going to be swept under the rug by the republican party, or will its leaders start to understand the issues that made Donald so popular.

Immigration - Immigration reform is way over-do.  Regardless of the final bill, as long as it shores up the border, I don't see how it won't pass.

Middle Class - Trade, taxes, education, etc., etc., etc., as they relate to the middle class need to be brought to the forefront.  I'm a strong believer that this country works best when there's a strong middle class.  Both parties will say it, but neither will act on it.  Its all about the (middle class) economy stupid!

Military Inventions - I'm growing increasingly tired of my tax dollars being spent on policing the world when our infrastructure and education system are in shambles. 

Campaign Finance - Corporate campaign financing and the potential corruption it causes has to be addressed.  I'm feeling the bern on this one.

My vote will be cast on April 26th in PA.  Since its a closed primary, I can only vote republican.  Therefore, I'll probably pull the lever for Kasich as Cruz is too conservative for my liking.  Quite honestly, if I could vote for the democratic ticket, I'd probably vote for Bernie as a vote against Hilary.  To me, she represents all that is bad in governments today.
This is how I've seen the situation all along. I loved the idea of what Trump represented. US politics is broken. One party totally blocking the other from getting anything done. The hate and the spite. It's just horrible. An outsider is exactly what we all need. Republican or democrat. Doesn't matter.  The only problem was who that outsider was as a person.  While he may have fixed some of the problems with the political system, he was causing more hatred and division than this country has seen since the 1950's. You can't take a stand against politics and totally close your eyes to a guy's character and lack of knowledge. This guy couldn't be president of a local Boy Scout pack, let alone of the United States of America.

 
Immigration - Immigration reform is way over-do.  Regardless of the final bill, as long as it shores up the border, I don't see how it won't pass.

Middle Class - Trade, taxes, education, etc., etc., etc., as they relate to the middle class need to be brought to the forefront.  I'm a strong believer that this country works best when there's a strong middle class.  Both parties will say it, but neither will act on it.  Its all about the (middle class) economy stupid!

Military Inventions - I'm growing increasingly tired of my tax dollars being spent on policing the world when our infrastructure and education system are in shambles. 

Campaign Finance - Corporate campaign financing and the potential corruption it causes has to be addressed.  I'm feeling the bern on this one.

My vote will be cast on April 26th in PA.  Since its a closed primary, I can only vote republican.  Therefore, I'll probably pull the lever for Kasich as Cruz is too conservative for my liking.  Quite honestly, if I could vote for the democratic ticket, I'd probably vote for Bernie as a vote against Hilary.  To me, she represents all that is bad in governments today.
First of all,  :goodposting:

Secondly, I think you might be a democrat. While outside of Bernie I unfortunately don't expect any movement on campaign finance, GOP tax cuts always go to the rich and they will never, ever, under any circumstance decrease funding for the military.

Have you heard them in the debates? "Our military has been DECIMATED!" It's unreal.

Not meant as an attack, just trying to recruit  :D  We need all the progressives we can get here in Purple PA!

 
No, his position was taken out of context and he clarified it.
Kind of like when he and his henchmen changed their story after the video emerged?

Before that, it was all lies.  After that, it was no big deal.

How's his investigation of Obama's birth certificate going? 

 
Kasich is a joke, any guy that wants to ban Fargo just because they don't like it isn't an adult. Also, if you paid attention to Kasich you'll see his positions are ones that benefit his donors, not US citizens. By all means though, vote for a guy that won't put your interest firsts because the media constantly manipulates everything Trump says.

 
Kasich is a joke, any guy that wants to ban Fargo just because they don't like it isn't an adult. Also, if you paid attention to Kasich you'll see his positions are ones that benefit his donors, not US citizens. By all means though, vote for a guy that won't put your interest firsts because the media constantly manipulates everything Trump says.
Yeah, how dare they record the words coming out of his mouth! 

http://www.nytimes.com/video/us/100000004269364/trump-and-violence.html

 
During his extended interview with the candidate yesterday, MSNBC’s Chris Matthews asked Trump about the specifics of the plan. From Mother Jones:


“I have actually—believe it or not, I have a lot of friends that are Muslim and they call me,” Trump said, when asked about his plan by MSNBC’s Chris Matthews, the event’s moderator. “In most cases, they’re very rich Muslims, OK?”

Matthews then asked Trump if his rich Muslim friends would be able enter the country under Trump’s Muslim ban. “They’ll come in,” Trump said. “You’ll have exceptions.”
:headbang:

 
...and he's winning. Something apparently doesn't add up.
You're right, he's winning- among Republicans. 

What doesn't add up is that Republican voters have gone off the deep end. But it's clear they're not taking the nation with them. The American public as a whole is not nearly as angry or pessimistic as Republicans are. 

Here's proof: latest approval ratings for President Obama is 53%. Among Republicans his approval rating is 12%. That's a huge disparity. It suggests that the rest of the nation just doesn't share conservative attitudes. Which is the main reason Trump is likely to get wiped out in the electoral college IMO. 

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top