What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Donald Trump for President thread (5 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I was at Whole Foods the day after Trump won the nomination and all the white people were walking around with sniper rifles saying they wanted to see some n--- try something.

 
What I recall from my time working at Whole Foods after Obama was elected- a few days after leaving Lehman Brothers but before becoming a modern day Roland Pryzbelewski - is all the minorities just taking whatever they wanted and thanking Obama on their way out the door with organic almond milk under one arm and a bag of kale chips under the other.  

 
When I was working the early morning shift at Whole Foods the day after Obama election, I recall all the white woman in short shorts hoarding the Salmon which I took as an indication that thy thought Obama was going to end commercial fishing - I had to tell the young ladies that we only sell the free range kind, and any disastrous anti commercial fishing legislation was not going to affect our stock stock levels.

 
Trump Delegate sent home.  Good news is the Chicago Bears called her in to try out for their O-Line.

Sure seems racisty.
You think the DNC and the folks who show up there...think we can find anything unusual on their FB or Twitter accounts? I bet we would all be shocked. 

That's another thing, someone is going to get sent home in all of those sea of people, take it to he bank. To take one instance and then demonize an entire group of folks as being the same as the one idiot you zone in on is just  :fishing:  and you're a good one GM. You try and angle that back at me like I am PT Barnum putting on a show in here. 

 
You think the DNC and the folks who show up there...think we can find anything unusual on their FB or Twitter accounts? I bet we would all be shocked. 

That's another thing, someone is going to get sent home in all of those sea of people, take it to he bank. To take one instance and then demonize an entire group of folks as being the same as the one idiot you zone in on is just  :fishing:  and you're a good one GM. You try and angle that back at me like I am PT Barnum putting on a show in here. 
PT Barnum had intelligence and charm.

 
"While I in no way intended to make racist or threatening statements, I now realize that they could be interpreted that way."

...

"Gayne wrote, over a photo of law enforcement officials on the roof on the iconic building on the Lake Erie shore:

“Our brave snipers just waiting for some “N—- to try something. Love them.”
:lmao: :lmao:  weird how that was taken that way. 

 
Hope that MM "rookie mistake" comment ends up as part of an ad in heavy rotation next month.

Though if you're crafting a Dem message and developing ad campaigns how the hell do you choose?  Schtick aside, there's too much material to use all of it -- will take some discipline to pick and choose and figure out which messages to hammer home.

 
btw... anyone want to guess who's speaking at the Convention tonight?

PHOENIX — A judge presiding over a racial profiling case against Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona handed down the first round of punishments Wednesday for the lawman’s decision to prolong his signature immigration patrols months after
he was told to stop.

U.S. District Judge Murray Snow ordered an overhaul of internal affairs investigations at the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office after previously finding Arpaio in civil contempt of court for disobeying him.

Additional penalties are expected against the 84-year-old lawman who calls himself “America’s Toughest Sheriff” and built his political reputation by cracking down on immigrants in the country illegally.
Those penalties were announced yesterday.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm signing onto his crazy train.  Can easily see him nominating an Anthony Kennedy type for the SC, which the court desperately needs (someone that doesn't just vote out of some ideology).  We can all guess how Hillary's nominee is going to vote on everything before the case even lands in their lap.

I won't toss him money like I did Bernie, but he'll get one extra vote here in the midwest.  Hillary is just the worst. I'd rather see that left wing radical Obama have a third term than have her in there.
I can easily see him nominating anyone from a first year law student to Richard Posner to Kanye West.  Claiming that you know what he would do or if he would even listen to anyone is of the utmost foolishness.

 
“Whether you are gay or straight, the Bill of Rights protects the rights of all of us to live according to our conscience,” Cruz averred. There were no boos here from the crowd of Trump-backing institutional loyalists. Only when “conscience” was linked to voting did the crowd erupt into a passionate, vocal vote of no confidence in Cruz’s remarks. That was not organic. As a number of outlets have confirmed, the Trump campaign was on the floor whipping up this sentiment, and it erupted at precisely the chosen, choreographed moment.

None of what happened last night was spontaneous. Pundits who have determined that Ted Cruz looked petty last night are, in fact, applauding the Trump campaign and the Republican National Committee for putting on a good show.
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/politics-ideas/tex-cruz-dissent-unravels-trump-gop/

- This is kind of sick and very much against our tradition if you think about it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I appreciate your post Moleculo. It's not a bad point, I just think it''s different, much different than this. Gays are not treated well within the black community, that's pretty factual if you look around. 

This infringes on a lot of folks beliefs and religions. Most are anti-gay if you read the manuals. Luckily and fortunately a lot of Christians even before the laws were passed seemed to have found a happy medium including non denominational churches that were/are much more progressive. 

I'm simply explaining the outcry as I have been for months but nobody wants to acknowledge it's even a problem or issue. 
If you read the manuals, no they are not.

 
This is the dirty secret of 2016 that no one will admit: The contest inaugurated by the Republican Party’s presidential primary has not and will not end this year. The RNC is congenitally resistant to reform. The conservative movement will not fall in line behind Trump (and they now have a leader to unite around). The Trump campaign is dependent upon the energy it derives from the prevalent but paranoid belief that it is a movement fatally betrayed by an army of two-faced saboteurs and wreckers.

This is not a healthy political movement. A united party would not have been so perturbed by Cruz’s affirmations. The speech—a relatively understated one, at that—would have been remembered as a decent but unremarkable bit of oration had the Trump campaign not done all they could to elevate it into a historic moment. It’s not Cruz’s fault that Donald Trump has turned the Republican coalition into a Jenga tower. Those internal divisions are what fuel the Trump campaign. They are the sustenance upon which the candidate’s boosters in conservative media nourish themselves. Ted Cruz spent much of his career in the U.S. Senate sowing divisions and pitting Republicans against one another for personal gain, but it was Trump who perfected the art. The result of their reckless stewardship of the institution they seek to lead is a badly damaged party addicted to internecine conflict.

If your goal here is to find a villain in this story, you’re not short on contenders. There are no custodians left in the GOP. Those who aspired to lead it have turned a union of like-minded patriots into an unstable coalition of rivals. Donald Trump created a party fueled by uniquely reactive and fissionable material, and Ted Cruz demonstrated that it’s easy enough to make it implode. An explosion isn’t just possible anymore; it may be inevitable.
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/politics-ideas/tex-cruz-dissent-unravels-trump-gop/

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I do question why the staff went out of their way to tell everyone they were on top of the trolling in here but continue to allow obvious Anti-Trump and Pro-Hilary folks to continue to bash and bash and bash...

It's not martyr...you all have a lot of name calling you have down in the face of JB asking people to be cool the last few days. 

Can anyone bring up one of mine in the last 20 pages here where I am name calling those who want to feast on MOP today? I'm not trying to be a martyr, it's simply the truth. 

If you aren't voting for Trump, why are you obsessed with people who might want to vote for him? I've never seen people treated like this in here except maybe the Jerry Sandusky thread where after a while you just couldn't even open it. 

This feels a lot like that one where if you don't scream in the 1st sentence of your post that your are AGAINST CHILD RAPE(didn't know you needed to post that for others to understand you are on their side) and this is starting to feel like if you even post a mild support for Trump you are met with daggers.

Every post in support of Trump is ridiculed and BBQ'd in here, that's simply the truth, much to the pain of JB and others it seems lately. 
Supporting Trump is just a shade less awful than child rape.  Maybe.  HTH.

 
Hope that MM "rookie mistake" comment ends up as part of an ad in heavy rotation next month.

Though if you're crafting a Dem message and developing ad campaigns how the hell do you choose?  Schtick aside, there's too much material to use all of it -- will take some discipline to pick and choose and figure out which messages to hammer home.
The list of gaffes is amazing. They should offend people across the spectrum :lol:  

 
It's all about fooling these losers into voting for them. You give them a crumb and they pounce on it like a starving rat. You don't have to give them much to keep them on your side, especially when the other side is giving them nothing.
Funny, that's what I think of when I see poor white folks supporting candidates calling for tax cuts for the rich to spur economic growth.  

 
The list of gaffes is amazing. They should offend people across the spectrum :lol:  
Well, at least the good news is the GOP isn't nominating a criminal like the DNC.  And I don't remember the left complaining about experience when Obama first ran.  He hadn't even run a lemonade stand at that point.

But only NOW is experience absolutely crucial.

 
"While I in no way intended to make racist or threatening statements, I now realize that they could be interpreted that way."

...

"Gayne wrote, over a photo of law enforcement officials on the roof on the iconic building on the Lake Erie shore:

“Our brave snipers just waiting for some “N—- to try something. Love them.”
:lmao:

 
Well, at least the good news is the GOP isn't nominating a criminal like the DNC.  And I don't remember the left complaining about experience when Obama first ran.  He hadn't even run a lemonade stand at that point.

But only NOW is experience absolutely crucial.
When your best case scenario is equating your side to the side you have to denigrate in the same breath.

 
Well, at least the good news is the GOP isn't nominating a criminal like the DNC.  And I don't remember the left complaining about experience when Obama first ran.  He hadn't even run a lemonade stand at that point.

But only NOW is experience absolutely crucial.
If Obama said a small percentage of the messed up stuff Trump has said he wouldn't have sniffed the nomination. It really is remarkable Trump won.

 
When your best case scenario is equating your side to the side you have to denigrate in the same breath.
Yeah, you obviously haven't read any of my posts on Trump.  He is not "my side" and I won't be voting for him.  I'm simply pointing out the hypocrisy of the left.  

It's what I do.

 
Yeah, you obviously haven't read any of my posts on Trump.  He is not "my side" and I won't be voting for him.  I'm simply pointing out the hypocrisy of the left.  

It's what I do.
Regardless, you are endlessly trying to equate Trump to Hillary.. as we have discussed before and you may have even agreed to, this falls woefully short.  

 
Yeah, you obviously haven't read any of my posts on Trump.  He is not "my side" and I won't be voting for him.  I'm simply pointing out the hypocrisy of the left.  

It's what I do.
Who has ever argued that there isn't hypocrisy on both sides? It's the dumbest thing ever.

Pointing out ridiculous #### that people like Hannity or McConnell say doesn't need a "well the left have a guy that does that too" comment. Just agree yeah that guy sucks and move on.

 
Well, at least the good news is the GOP isn't nominating a criminal like the DNC.  And I don't remember the left complaining about experience when Obama first ran.  He hadn't even run a lemonade stand at that point.

But only NOW is experience absolutely crucial.
Obama had way more relevamt government experience than Trump and the right has called him community organizor for 8 years whining about experience.   Now they nominate someone less qualified.

You act like its the left's hypocrisy here and not the right that are being gigantic hypocrites in this one.

 
If Ebert were still around - Haven't seen this level of black comedic, high stakes political hijinks coupled with nuclear risk and threat since Dr. Strangelove.   

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree with that.  I never expected this either.
Hi Five Max we agree!

Besides the comedy that Trump has provided it has highlighted to me how ridiculous some of these guys are. 

I agree with almost nothing that Ted Cruz does but at least he is telling Trump to piss up a rope. Same with Kasich. Guys like Christie are beyond pathetic.

In 4 or 8 years if a Kardashian wins the Dems nom I'll be trashing them with everyone else :lol:

 
Well, at least the good news is the GOP isn't nominating a criminal like the DNC.  And I don't remember the left complaining about experience when Obama first ran.  He hadn't even run a lemonade stand at that point.

But only NOW is experience absolutely crucial.
Are we sure the statute of limitations has tolled on a fraud charge in all states that Trump University advertised and operated in or where the students resided?  

 
Obama had way more relevamt government experience than Trump and the right has called him community organizor for 8 years whining about experience.   Now they nominate someone less qualified.

You act like its the left's hypocrisy here and not the right that are being gigantic hypocrites in this one.
Maybe a little more, but not so much you would trust him so "way more" is a over-exaggeration.

But what I'm really hearing you say is that NEITHER side should be discussing Trump's lack of experience.  I agree.

 
Maybe a little more, but not so much you would trust him so "way more" is a over-exaggeration.

But what I'm really hearing you say is that NEITHER side should be discussing Trump's lack of experience.  I agree.
No, you arent hearing me say that.

Obamas experience wasnt bad at all. That was grap the GOP pushed to omplain about him.

 
When Trump puts together 10 minutes of a good back and forth where he talks about policy it will be the first time. He cannot get through an interview without sounding like an embarrassment.

Obama talked an amazing game.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top