The Bears could use the help.Trump Delegate sent home. Good news is the Chicago Bears called her in to try out for their O-Line.
Sure seems racisty.
You think the DNC and the folks who show up there...think we can find anything unusual on their FB or Twitter accounts? I bet we would all be shocked.Trump Delegate sent home. Good news is the Chicago Bears called her in to try out for their O-Line.
Sure seems racisty.
and you're a good one GM. You try and angle that back at me like I am PT Barnum putting on a show in here. ^^^ Mr. Establishment Mitch McConnell covering for Trump.NYT Politics Verified account @nytpolitics
“I am willing to kind of chalk it up to a rookie mistake,” Mitch McConnell said of Trump's latest statements on NATO
PT Barnum had intelligence and charm.You think the DNC and the folks who show up there...think we can find anything unusual on their FB or Twitter accounts? I bet we would all be shocked.
That's another thing, someone is going to get sent home in all of those sea of people, take it to he bank. To take one instance and then demonize an entire group of folks as being the same as the one idiot you zone in on is justand you're a good one GM. You try and angle that back at me like I am PT Barnum putting on a show in here.
^^^ Mr. Establishment Mitch McConnell covering for Trump.
what an ### that guy is. Rookie mistake. He would be ####ting his pants if Clinton said this as would every other conservative loud mouth type. ^^^ Mr. Establishment Mitch McConnell covering for Trump.NYT Politics Verified account @nytpolitics
“I am willing to kind of chalk it up to a rookie mistake,” Mitch McConnell said of Trump's latest statements on NATO
"While I in no way intended to make racist or threatening statements, I now realize that they could be interpreted that way."
...
"Gayne wrote, over a photo of law enforcement officials on the roof on the iconic building on the Lake Erie shore:
“Our brave snipers just waiting for some “N—- to try something. Love them.”
weird how that was taken that way. More proof Trump is the right President for America 2016.
Ojārs Ēriks Kalniņš @Ojars_E_Kalnins
Too bad the NY Times didn't ask Trump if he would defend NATO member Slovenia if attacked.
Oh yes, that's a natural takeaway.More proof Trump is the right President for America 2016.
Those penalties were announced yesterday.PHOENIX — A judge presiding over a racial profiling case against Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona handed down the first round of punishments Wednesday for the lawman’s decision to prolong his signature immigration patrols months after
he was told to stop.
U.S. District Judge Murray Snow ordered an overhaul of internal affairs investigations at the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office after previously finding Arpaio in civil contempt of court for disobeying him.
Additional penalties are expected against the 84-year-old lawman who calls himself “America’s Toughest Sheriff” and built his political reputation by cracking down on immigrants in the country illegally.
I can easily see him nominating anyone from a first year law student to Richard Posner to Kanye West. Claiming that you know what he would do or if he would even listen to anyone is of the utmost foolishness.I'm signing onto his crazy train. Can easily see him nominating an Anthony Kennedy type for the SC, which the court desperately needs (someone that doesn't just vote out of some ideology). We can all guess how Hillary's nominee is going to vote on everything before the case even lands in their lap.
I won't toss him money like I did Bernie, but he'll get one extra vote here in the midwest. Hillary is just the worst. I'd rather see that left wing radical Obama have a third term than have her in there.
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/politics-ideas/tex-cruz-dissent-unravels-trump-gop/“Whether you are gay or straight, the Bill of Rights protects the rights of all of us to live according to our conscience,” Cruz averred. There were no boos here from the crowd of Trump-backing institutional loyalists. Only when “conscience” was linked to voting did the crowd erupt into a passionate, vocal vote of no confidence in Cruz’s remarks. That was not organic. As a number of outlets have confirmed, the Trump campaign was on the floor whipping up this sentiment, and it erupted at precisely the chosen, choreographed moment.
None of what happened last night was spontaneous. Pundits who have determined that Ted Cruz looked petty last night are, in fact, applauding the Trump campaign and the Republican National Committee for putting on a good show.
If you read the manuals, no they are not.I appreciate your post Moleculo. It's not a bad point, I just think it''s different, much different than this. Gays are not treated well within the black community, that's pretty factual if you look around.
This infringes on a lot of folks beliefs and religions. Most are anti-gay if you read the manuals. Luckily and fortunately a lot of Christians even before the laws were passed seemed to have found a happy medium including non denominational churches that were/are much more progressive.
I'm simply explaining the outcry as I have been for months but nobody wants to acknowledge it's even a problem or issue.
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/politics-ideas/tex-cruz-dissent-unravels-trump-gop/This is the dirty secret of 2016 that no one will admit: The contest inaugurated by the Republican Party’s presidential primary has not and will not end this year. The RNC is congenitally resistant to reform. The conservative movement will not fall in line behind Trump (and they now have a leader to unite around). The Trump campaign is dependent upon the energy it derives from the prevalent but paranoid belief that it is a movement fatally betrayed by an army of two-faced saboteurs and wreckers.
This is not a healthy political movement. A united party would not have been so perturbed by Cruz’s affirmations. The speech—a relatively understated one, at that—would have been remembered as a decent but unremarkable bit of oration had the Trump campaign not done all they could to elevate it into a historic moment. It’s not Cruz’s fault that Donald Trump has turned the Republican coalition into a Jenga tower. Those internal divisions are what fuel the Trump campaign. They are the sustenance upon which the candidate’s boosters in conservative media nourish themselves. Ted Cruz spent much of his career in the U.S. Senate sowing divisions and pitting Republicans against one another for personal gain, but it was Trump who perfected the art. The result of their reckless stewardship of the institution they seek to lead is a badly damaged party addicted to internecine conflict.
If your goal here is to find a villain in this story, you’re not short on contenders. There are no custodians left in the GOP. Those who aspired to lead it have turned a union of like-minded patriots into an unstable coalition of rivals. Donald Trump created a party fueled by uniquely reactive and fissionable material, and Ted Cruz demonstrated that it’s easy enough to make it implode. An explosion isn’t just possible anymore; it may be inevitable.
Ojārs Ēriks Kalniņš @Ojars_E_Kalnins 4h4 hours ago Riga, Latvia
Latvia raised its defense budget 40% last year. More to come until we reach 2% GDP by 2018.
Supporting Trump is just a shade less awful than child rape. Maybe. HTH.I do question why the staff went out of their way to tell everyone they were on top of the trolling in here but continue to allow obvious Anti-Trump and Pro-Hilary folks to continue to bash and bash and bash...
It's not martyr...you all have a lot of name calling you have down in the face of JB asking people to be cool the last few days.
Can anyone bring up one of mine in the last 20 pages here where I am name calling those who want to feast on MOP today? I'm not trying to be a martyr, it's simply the truth.
If you aren't voting for Trump, why are you obsessed with people who might want to vote for him? I've never seen people treated like this in here except maybe the Jerry Sandusky thread where after a while you just couldn't even open it.
This feels a lot like that one where if you don't scream in the 1st sentence of your post that your are AGAINST CHILD RAPE(didn't know you needed to post that for others to understand you are on their side) and this is starting to feel like if you even post a mild support for Trump you are met with daggers.
Every post in support of Trump is ridiculed and BBQ'd in here, that's simply the truth, much to the pain of JB and others it seems lately.
The list of gaffes is amazing. They should offend people across the spectrumHope that MM "rookie mistake" comment ends up as part of an ad in heavy rotation next month.
Though if you're crafting a Dem message and developing ad campaigns how the hell do you choose? Schtick aside, there's too much material to use all of it -- will take some discipline to pick and choose and figure out which messages to hammer home.
Funny, that's what I think of when I see poor white folks supporting candidates calling for tax cuts for the rich to spur economic growth.It's all about fooling these losers into voting for them. You give them a crumb and they pounce on it like a starving rat. You don't have to give them much to keep them on your side, especially when the other side is giving them nothing.
Well, at least the good news is the GOP isn't nominating a criminal like the DNC. And I don't remember the left complaining about experience when Obama first ran. He hadn't even run a lemonade stand at that point.The list of gaffes is amazing. They should offend people across the spectrum![]()
"While I in no way intended to make racist or threatening statements, I now realize that they could be interpreted that way."
...
"Gayne wrote, over a photo of law enforcement officials on the roof on the iconic building on the Lake Erie shore:
“Our brave snipers just waiting for some “N—- to try something. Love them.”
When your best case scenario is equating your side to the side you have to denigrate in the same breath.Well, at least the good news is the GOP isn't nominating a criminal like the DNC. And I don't remember the left complaining about experience when Obama first ran. He hadn't even run a lemonade stand at that point.
But only NOW is experience absolutely crucial.
If Obama said a small percentage of the messed up stuff Trump has said he wouldn't have sniffed the nomination. It really is remarkable Trump won.Well, at least the good news is the GOP isn't nominating a criminal like the DNC. And I don't remember the left complaining about experience when Obama first ran. He hadn't even run a lemonade stand at that point.
But only NOW is experience absolutely crucial.
Yeah, you obviously haven't read any of my posts on Trump. He is not "my side" and I won't be voting for him. I'm simply pointing out the hypocrisy of the left.When your best case scenario is equating your side to the side you have to denigrate in the same breath.
I agree with that. I never expected this either.If Obama said a small percentage of the messed up stuff Trump has said he wouldn't have sniffed the nomination. It really is remarkable Trump won.
Regardless, you are endlessly trying to equate Trump to Hillary.. as we have discussed before and you may have even agreed to, this falls woefully short.Yeah, you obviously haven't read any of my posts on Trump. He is not "my side" and I won't be voting for him. I'm simply pointing out the hypocrisy of the left.
It's what I do.
Who has ever argued that there isn't hypocrisy on both sides? It's the dumbest thing ever.Yeah, you obviously haven't read any of my posts on Trump. He is not "my side" and I won't be voting for him. I'm simply pointing out the hypocrisy of the left.
It's what I do.
Obama had way more relevamt government experience than Trump and the right has called him community organizor for 8 years whining about experience. Now they nominate someone less qualified.Well, at least the good news is the GOP isn't nominating a criminal like the DNC. And I don't remember the left complaining about experience when Obama first ran. He hadn't even run a lemonade stand at that point.
But only NOW is experience absolutely crucial.
Jeff Gauvin @JeffersonObama 13m13 minutes ago
NEW#polls 7/21
■REUT: Clinton +4
■RASM: Trump +1
■ARG: C +1
■DECP: C+7
■ECN: C +4
■CNN: C +7
■NBC: C +5
■ABC: C +4
■AP: C +4
■PEW: C +9
Hi Five Max we agree!I agree with that. I never expected this either.
Are we sure the statute of limitations has tolled on a fraud charge in all states that Trump University advertised and operated in or where the students resided?Well, at least the good news is the GOP isn't nominating a criminal like the DNC. And I don't remember the left complaining about experience when Obama first ran. He hadn't even run a lemonade stand at that point.
But only NOW is experience absolutely crucial.
Maybe a little more, but not so much you would trust him so "way more" is a over-exaggeration.Obama had way more relevamt government experience than Trump and the right has called him community organizor for 8 years whining about experience. Now they nominate someone less qualified.
You act like its the left's hypocrisy here and not the right that are being gigantic hypocrites in this one.
A little is infinitely greater than none.Maybe a little more, but not so much you would trust him so "way more" is a over-exaggeration.
But what I'm really hearing you say is that NEITHER side should be discussing Trump's lack of experience. I agree.
No, you arent hearing me say that.Maybe a little more, but not so much you would trust him so "way more" is a over-exaggeration.
But what I'm really hearing you say is that NEITHER side should be discussing Trump's lack of experience. I agree.
"A little" is not infinitely greater than none. That's why it's called "a little".A little is infinitely greater than none.
Sure it is. Obama had infinity times more experience than Donald."A little" is not infinitely greater than none. That's why it's called "a little".
And no, it was not enough to inspire any amount of confidence that he knew what he was doing at the time.
Well, we'll just have to agree to disagree because Obama was just about as green as they come.Sure it is. Obama had infinity times more experience than Donald.
He now has eight years of experience and you still hate himWell, we'll just have to agree to disagree because Obama was just about as green as they come.
We're talking about his experience when he first ran. I don't hate him, though. I just think he did a sub standard job at best.He now has eight years of experience and you still hate him
10?When Trump puts together 10 minutes of a good back and forth where he talks about policy it will be the first time. He cannot get through an interview without sounding like an embarrassment.
Obama talked an amazing game.