Leeroy Jenkins
Footballguy
ScaryThe way the system (doesn't) treat(s) the mentally ill is atrocious
ScaryThe way the system (doesn't) treat(s) the mentally ill is atrocious
Why would you need to fumigate the White House before burning it to the ground?
Dammit! I knew there was a flaw in there somewhere.Why would you need to fumigate the White House before burning it to the ground?
What if the lessee was dba Terrorists R Us?OK, I rarely if ever defend Donald Trump. He's a true jackass, especially when it comes to running for President, and I want him to lose very badly.
But this story is bogus. Take it from someone who has been in commercial real estate my entire life: leasing office space to somebody is not the same as "business dealings". The title of the article implies that Trump was somehow connected to this bank that funded terrorism. That's not the way leasing works. This is a hit piece.
"I say we stomp him! Then we tattoo him! Then we hang him! And then we kill him!"Why would you need to fumigate the White House before burning it to the ground?
I think you're reading more into what is there. who said he was connected to the bank? he was renting space to a bank controlled by the Iranian governement. sorry, but that is doing business with them, regardless of what someone in real estate calls it. If you have any issues with the facts presented, then lets hear them.OK, I rarely if ever defend Donald Trump. He's a true jackass, especially when it comes to running for President, and I want him to lose very badly.
But this story is bogus. Take it from someone who has been in commercial real estate my entire life: leasing office space to somebody is not the same as "business dealings". The title of the article implies that Trump was somehow connected to this bank that funded terrorism. That's not the way leasing works. This is a hit piece.
I know that quote from somewhere. Without Google: Pee Wee?"I say we stomp him! Then we tattoo him! Then we hang him! And then we kill him!"
Lots of ways - accelerated depreciation on real estate for example. You build a lot of stuff in the 90's, you get to depreciate it, plus deduct building expenses.Not sure if this has been addressed but:
I am OK with Trump using the current system to write off his losses, that is the way the system is set up so go for it...However, 2 things.
1) How does a mega successful businessman like Trump lose almost a billion dollars in the 90's? We had a great sustained growth during the 90's, you have to be really crappy to lose money during that time.
2) He has complained a lot about other people not paying their fair share of taxes. You can't have it both ways...Stop with the "Do as I say, Not as I do" attitude.
Also a possible source for the tax returns:gaming commissions in states where he had casinos like - *coughcough* - NJ he had to submit tax returns, apparently. Christie's not to blame, of course, but Christie's the least popular man in Jersey though...
Not sure if this has been addressed but:
I am OK with Trump using the current system to write off his losses, that is the way the system is set up so go for it...However, 2 things.
1) How does a mega successful businessman like Trump lose almost a billion dollars in the 90's? We had a great sustained growth during the 90's, you have to be really crappy to lose money during that time.
2) He has complained a lot about other people not paying their fair share of taxes. You can't have it both ways...Stop with the "Do as I say, Not as I do" attitude.
No need to focus on Trump's tax returns. There's plenty of worse stuff than digging through the incomprehensibly complex tax returns of a rich CEO with as many businesses as he has.The thing that angers me: I don't think he actually "lost" the money. I think he "owed" $900M to banks, and used that "debt" as "losses." I think he then negotiated a deal to pay the debt with pennies on the dollar. So those "losses" then go away. I'd also be willing to bet that he didn't declare the negotiation of this deal on later taxes (which would technically be "income" because he is having debt wiped clear). And finally, I'd be willing to be that as part of the negotiation to clear the debt for pennies on the dollar, he used a shell corporation, controlled by him, to purchase the debt, thereby "parking" the debt in some sort of corporation. Which means that debt is still there today, and he will never have to repay it because he controls the corp that purchased the debt.
I have no idea if this is legal or illegal. But I'm convinced to my core that this happened. So he's having it both ways: He gets to declare "losses" that he never actually lost, because he'll never have to repay them.
Does it get shadier than that? I'd love to know if that is legal.
It's good to take a break from Trump every once in a while and reflect on what an incredible doosh Mike Pence is.
run out of material?So the trolls have run out of bash Trump material now and have to resort to bashing Trump's kids? Wow. You guys need to get help. Seriously.
It could also be a Trump insider concerned about a Trump presidency, or concerned about potential future leaks that would be very damaging to Trump if he were to become president. Check the envelop for some Trump family DNA.
Under bankruptcy rules the debt is treated as non-taxable income.The thing that angers me: I don't think he actually "lost" the money. I think he "owed" $900M to banks, and used that "debt" as "losses." I think he then negotiated a deal to pay the debt with pennies on the dollar. So those "losses" then go away. I'd also be willing to bet that he didn't declare the negotiation of this deal on later taxes (which would technically be "income" because he is having debt wiped clear). And finally, I'd be willing to be that as part of the negotiation to clear the debt for pennies on the dollar, he used a shell corporation, controlled by him, to purchase the debt, thereby "parking" the debt in some sort of corporation. Which means that debt is still there today, and he will never have to repay it because he controls the corp that purchased the debt.
I have no idea if this is legal or illegal. But I'm convinced to my core that this happened. So he's having it both ways: He gets to declare "losses" that he never actually lost, because he'll never have to repay them.
Does it get shadier than that? I'd love to know if that is legal.
I still have not seen a plan for what he is going to do with his massive business holdings if elected. I can't imagine him putting it in a blind trust and if he turns it over to his kids (Like I have heard), his name will still be on it and it will create major conflict of interests.No need to focus on Trump's tax returns. There's plenty of worse stuff than digging through the incomprehensibly complex tax returns of a rich CEO with as many businesses as he has.
It's good to take a break from Trump every once in a while and reflect on what an incredible doosh Mike Pence is.
Mike, you mean the process that found he should never have been convicted? That one, or some other process I don't know about?Today, Pence refused, saying it needs to stand “out of respect for the judicial process.” This comes after a two-year delay where Pence tried to claim that Cooper’s paperwork wasn’t in order.
Pretty sure commercial can't use accelerated depreciation. It's says 39 years straight line. Multi family is 27.5 years straight line.Lots of ways - accelerated depreciation on real estate for example. You build a lot of stuff in the 90's, you get to depreciate it, plus deduct building expenses.
Yeah, the laws have changed since then, but I believe that in the 90s you could do accelerated depreciated. Any tax experts remember?Pretty sure commercial can't use accelerated depreciation. It's says 39 years straight line. Multi family is 27.5 years straight line.
@Steve TaskerYeah, the laws have changed since then, but I believe that in the 90s you could do accelerated depreciated. Any tax experts remember?
Funny. I missed your outrage when the right was slamming Obama's daughters this past summer.So the trolls have run out of bash Trump material now and have to resort to bashing Trump's kids? Wow. You guys need to get help. Seriously.
"I say...we let him go..."I know that quote from somewhere. Without Google: Pee Wee?
Why is it trolling when they have put themselves front and center? Fair game once they voluntarily step in the ring, right?So the trolls have run out of bash Trump material now and have to resort to bashing Trump's kids? Wow. You guys need to get help. Seriously.
It's up to Trump to ask for an investigation. He might not like what he finds.It could also be a Trump insider concerned about a Trump presidency, or concerned about potential future leaks that would be very damaging to Trump if he were to become president. Check the envelop for some Trump family DNA.
They all play roles in the campaign and would likely be prominent advisors in the WH. Same is true of Bill & Chelsea IMO.So the trolls have run out of bash Trump material now and have to resort to bashing Trump's kids? Wow. You guys need to get help. Seriously.
Now imagine his kids are a handful of Skittles...So the trolls have run out of bash Trump material now and have to resort to bashing Trump's kids? Wow. You guys need to get help. Seriously.
1) it turns out Trump's NOL that year was almost 2% of NOL claimed across the entire country that year. What we're seeing is a long pattern of a man seeking to enrich himself at any cost, even if it bankrupted his own businesses.Not sure if this has been addressed but:
I am OK with Trump using the current system to write off his losses, that is the way the system is set up so go for it...However, 2 things.
1) How does a mega successful businessman like Trump lose almost a billion dollars in the 90's? We had a great sustained growth during the 90's, you have to be really crappy to lose money during that time.
2) He has complained a lot about other people not paying their fair share of taxes. You can't have it both ways...Stop with the "Do as I say, Not as I do" attitude.
That's a good point.What smells here with regards to his taxes is he is claiming a 900+M PERSONAL loss? How are any of his entities structured to where he - and not a Corporation are taking on a loss of this size? He should have been homeless if this was the case with all sorts of lawsuits going after his personal belongings/residences/assets. It looks like he may have manipulated some of these losses from Corporate to Personal -and then be able to write off his Personal taxes in future years. May have been perfectly legal somehow but it sure doesn't smell right.
You mean his adult children? Who willingly make statements to the media? Yeah, how dare anyone criticize them.So the trolls have run out of bash Trump material now and have to resort to bashing Trump's kids? Wow. You guys need to get help. Seriously.
The three have all appeared in the media multiple times speaking on behalf of the campaign. Ivanka even rolled out policy. They're completely fair game.So the trolls have run out of bash Trump material now and have to resort to bashing Trump's kids? Wow. You guys need to get help. Seriously.
According to logic you have displayed in these threads recently, it's the kids' own fault for going on TV and saying dumb things. Or did you forget that you're an ####### victim-blamer?So the trolls have run out of bash Trump material now and have to resort to bashing Trump's kids? Wow. You guys need to get help. Seriously.
There have only been 10 pages added to this thread since Friday. Low energy!run out of material?
![]()
never
If it turns out the real reason Trump hasn't released his taxes is because he had them on a private server and deleted them, do you promise to go ape#### over it and call for Trump to go to jail?He's never been convicted of tax fraud so therefore he's done nothing wrong? Isn't that pretty much how it goes for Hillary and classified information/servers?
If he cheated on his taxes he should face the penalties for doing so. If that's a fine so be it if it's jail so be it. It's not as bad as putting human life in danger by intentionally mishandling classified information but of course he should be prosecuted if your wet dream plays out. This isn't very difficult.If it turns out the real reason Trump hasn't released his taxes is because he had them on a private server and deleted them, do you promise to go ape#### over it and call for Trump to go to jail?
I missed the Obama kids thing, but yeah, that's outrageous too. I'm just commenting on the never-ending petty circle-jerking - you'd think your prostates would be exhausted by now. You know, Trump is a terrible candidate, we all get that. The sooner you realize that the people who got him there have legitimate concerns, the sooner we can stop the bleeding and divisiveness. Those of you engaged a bashing and calling his supporters stupid are contributing to the problem, not helping to solve it.Funny. I missed your outrage when the right was slamming Obama's daughters this past summer.
In general, I would agree that a politician's kids really ought to be off limits -- but in this case, Trump's kids are actively putting themselves in the spotlight and serving as mouthpieces for his campaign, so they are drawing some fire. If they were just trying to do their own thing, I'd be absolutely on board that attacking them would be bad.
Also,at "run out of Trump material."
“They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists,” Trump famously said. It turns out, they’re also bringing more tax payments than he is.
You might note the 8% is state and local taxes, not federal. Apples and oranges.From a DKos Diary:
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/10/3/1577252/-Donald-Trump-probably-doesn-t-pay-taxes-Undocumented-immigrants-pay-billions
Donald Trump, the anti-immigrant crusader, may not have paid any federal income tax for close to 20 years, to say nothing of any strategies he uses to get out of paying other taxes. Meanwhile, the immigrants he rants against as burdens on the U.S. are paying vast amounts of taxes:
A study by the non-partisan Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy found undocumented immigrants paid $11.84 billion in state and federal taxes in 2012. Researchers suggested tax contributions would increase with President Obama's executive orders on immigrations, specifically program aimed at protecting students and their parents from deportation.
According to the study:
Undocumented immigrants nationwide pay on average an estimated 8 percent of their incomes in state and local taxes (this is their effective state and local tax rate). To put this in perspective, the top 1 percent of taxpayers pay an average nationwide effective tax rate of just 5.4 percent.
Additionally:
Unauthorized workers are paying an estimated $13 billion a year in social security taxes and only getting around $1 billion back, according to a senior government statistician.
“They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists,” Trump famously said. It turns out, they’re also bringing more tax payments than he is.
What are those legitimate concerns? Please spell them out.I missed the Obama kids thing, but yeah, that's outrageous too. I'm just commenting on the never-ending petty circle-jerking - you'd think your prostates would be exhausted by now. You know, Trump is a terrible candidate, we all get that. The sooner you realize that the people who got him there have legitimate concerns, the sooner we can stop the bleeding and divisiveness. Those of you engaged a bashing and calling his supporters stupid are contributing to the problem, not helping to solve it.
"legitimate concerns"
I'll go ahead and assume this is all schtick.Trump has Mike Lee on his short list for Supreme Court judge. I would love to see that happen. I wanted him to run for President but I'm glad he didn't and avoided this train wreck. As an ardent Constitutionalist, I think he's more suited for the Supreme Court than the Presidency.
Personally I think there's a 50% chance Trump would appoint a non-lawyer.Trump has Mike Lee on his short list for Supreme Court judge. I would love to see that happen. I wanted him to run for President but I'm glad he didn't and avoided this train wreck. As an ardent Constitutionalist, I think he's more suited for the Supreme Court than the Presidency.