What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Donald Trump for President thread (6 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
OMG people are arguing and bickering in here!!!  WHY AREN'T YOU DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT 3C's??????
The fact that you can't see the difference between all the other posts versus your endless back and forth with squis is shocking considering otherwise you seem like a fairly intelligent adult. But feel free to keep calling me out. It shows your true colors. :cry:
I'm just mocking you for mocking me.  HTH.  800+ pages of bickering and counting.  :bye:

 
I'm just mocking you for mocking me.  HTH.  800+ pages of bickering and counting.  :bye:
Where did I mock you? I simply stated that the constant back and forth between you and squis, and several people/sho, was getting old. And it was in response to someone else saying for you two to "get a room" or something to that effect. Notice how the others didn't say a thing? Yet you've felt the need to comment about it several times. It's almost Trump like. <- now that could very well be interpreted as mocking you. :hey:

 
He's certainly allowed to avoid paying taxes, and to declare losses. But I don't think it's admirable to fire thousands of employees and stiff contractors and declare bankruptcy in order to horde wealth. I couldn't do that and live with myself. My earnings aren't based on taking advantage of other people. 
But you do or did hire illegals so you have no problem taking advantage of them

 
The Trump campaign is neither contesting the integrity of the leaked tax documents nor releasing the full returns to disprove the speculation surrounding them.

Basically, the Trump campaign is saying what's actually in the full tax returns are worse than what people are imagining.  Much worse.

 
Nothing is more obvious to me than the source for the leaked Trump taxes earlier today.  It comes from the Trump camp and maybe even from Trump himself
 
The nearly billion dollar paper loss gave him a huge tax loophole, one big enough for him to squeeze his gigantic ego through and explains the reason for the "routine audit" and probably confirms the he hasn't paid a dime in Federal Income taxes in decades.   We believe that this was released at 10pm on a Saturday night by the Trump campaign as it had finally come to a crossroads with the taxes and they needed to have this "leaked" before they went to release his current taxes, so that the no-income tax thing can be properly explained to a sheepish public. 
Hmm.  The Trump campaign running a post oak bluff?  Under normal campaign management I could see it, but that move seems too complicated for the skill level displayed so far.

 
If you don't think Donald is a danger to the world as a president you are being naive. He is an easily manipulated impulsive egomaniac. He isn't fit to be in charge of a crosswalk. 
I said that I don't think he'd make a good President but I also don't believe that a Trump Presidency would be the nightmare scenario that many envision it would be. But that wasn't my point. I think Hillary will win this easily and my vote is even less important here in NY. If I lived in a swing state, I wouldn't vote for him. I've heard people say that a vote for Gary Johnson isn't really a vote for the man but for either a third party or the Libertarian Party specifically. Can't I say the same thing for a vote for Trump? If I think it's a meaningless vote, and I do, wouldn't voting for him be a vote against the Establishment Republicans. Trump is clearly much more socially moderate than typical Republicans, and that's a direction I want the party to go to. I also do agree with lower corporate tax rates, tightening up immigration, fixing the problems with the VA and a few other things that Trump brings up.

In short, I don't think Trump will win but I do think a vote for him is a kick in the ### of the Establishment Republicans. It makes me feel like my vote has some meaning.

 
I said that I don't think he'd make a good President but I also don't believe that a Trump Presidency would be the nightmare scenario that many envision it would be. But that wasn't my point. I think Hillary will win this easily and my vote is even less important here in NY. If I lived in a swing state, I wouldn't vote for him. I've heard people say that a vote for Gary Johnson isn't really a vote for the man but for either a third party or the Libertarian Party specifically. Can't I say the same thing for a vote for Trump? If I think it's a meaningless vote, and I do, wouldn't voting for him be a vote against the Establishment Republicans. Trump is clearly much more socially moderate than typical Republicans, and that's a direction I want the party to go to. I also do agree with lower corporate tax rates, tightening up immigration, fixing the problems with the VA and a few other things that Trump brings up.

In short, I don't think Trump will win but I do think a vote for him is a kick in the ### of the Establishment Republicans. It makes me feel like my vote has some meaning.
You're only sending the message that you'll vote for the Republican nominee no matter who it is.

 
But you do or did hire illegals so you have no problem taking advantage of them
Lol you know nothing about what I do. I don't ask people if they're illegal. If I need day laborers for immediate work I pay them above going rates. If I and others didn't hire them they would be destitute, or if you got your wish, deported. I don't think I'm taking advantage at all; I work with illegal immigrants when I can in part because I want to help them succeed. 

I have NEVER taken advantage of anyone in my life and I certainly would never take glee in ripping people off the way your hero does. 

 
You're only sending the message that you'll vote for the Republican nominee no matter who it is.
But if Trump gets destroyed, it will only serve to empower a more right leaning party, imo. Trump is actually very moderate on lots of issues and that's where I think the party needs to go to succeed in the future.

 
But you do or did hire illegals so you have no problem taking advantage of them
Not surprising that a guy who never has been to a laundromat in his life and looks down at people who shop at Walmart as rabble would think that Tim paying day laborers at the going rate is taking advantage of them.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
But if Trump gets destroyed, it will only serve to empower a more right leaning party, imo. Trump is actually very moderate on lots of issues and that's where I think the party needs to go to succeed in the future.
While it's true that Trump falls to the left of establishment Republicans on social issues, that hasn't been even close to the center piece, or even a remotely important part, of his campaign. His message has been based around the loony far alt-right positions of xenophobia and authoritarianism, and if he comes close, those are the forces that are likely to ne emboldened as opposed to any type of moderation of the party establishment.

 
While it's true that Trump falls to the left of establishment Republicans on social issues, that hasn't been even close to the center piece, or even a remotely important part, of his campaign. His message has been based around the loony far alt-right positions of xenophobia and authoritarianism, and if he comes close, those are the forces that are likely to ne emboldened as opposed to any type of moderation of the party establishment.
No doubt that will be part of it and maybe even a major part of it but I have to think that having the religious right largely marginalized will not go unnoticed. The same goes for some other social issues. Trump seems to be LGBT friendly and his abortion stance is basically non-existent. He's made comments that I'm sure the NRA isn't too happy about either. If you can take out the man, he's a good candidate on paper.

 
No doubt that will be part of it and maybe even a major part of it but I have to think that having the religious right largely marginalized will not go unnoticed. The same goes for some other social issues. Trump seems to be LGBT friendly and his abortion stance is basically non-existent. He's made comments that I'm sure the NRA isn't too happy about either. If you can take out the man, he's a good candidate on paper.
Ehhh, his positions on the economy and foreign policy are unrealistic and genuinely dangerous, and those two spheres are hugely important. We can't simply return to early 20th century isolationism and economic protectionism.

 
No doubt that will be part of it and maybe even a major part of it but I have to think that having the religious right largely marginalized will not go unnoticed. The same goes for some other social issues. Trump seems to be LGBT friendly and his abortion stance is basically non-existent. He's made comments that I'm sure the NRA isn't too happy about either. If you can take out the man, he's a good candidate on paper.
How much of his campaign would you estimate has been spent pushing these parts of his platform?  Do you think they would be priorities in a Trump Administration?

ETA: I do think Trump's pro-LGBT stance is admirable.  I don't think it's fair to say his abortion stance is "non-existent".  It's pretty clear he's campaigning as a pro-lifer, and has made it clear an anti-abortion stance would be a litmus test for any Supreme Court nominee.  (I do agree it's debatable about whether his campaign aligns with how he feels personally.  If a news story broke that he paid a mistress to have an abortion and keep quiet about it, I doubt it would even be considered news.)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lol you know nothing about what I do. I don't ask people if they're illegal. If I need day laborers for immediate work I pay them above going rates. If I and others didn't hire them they would be destitute, or if you got your wish, deported. I don't think I'm taking advantage at all; I work with illegal immigrants when I can in part because I want to help them succeed. 

I have NEVER taken advantage of anyone in my life and I certainly would never take glee in ripping people off the way your hero does. 
1st off I only have had hero in my life and that was my father. Trump is no political hero , wouldn't even say I'm a fan of his , but he's a disruptive force for change.

So you pay above going rates for illegals , so noble of you. Why don't you hire a day laborer the correct way? 

 
But if Trump gets destroyed, it will only serve to empower a more right leaning party, imo. Trump is actually very moderate on lots of issues and that's where I think the party needs to go to succeed in the future.
This is a stretch

 
No doubt that will be part of it and maybe even a major part of it but I have to think that having the religious right largely marginalized will not go unnoticed. The same goes for some other social issues. Trump seems to be LGBT friendly and his abortion stance is basically non-existent. He's made comments that I'm sure the NRA isn't too happy about either. If you can take out the man, he's a good candidate on paper.
If you can take out the radioactivity, Chernobyl is a good nuclear reactor on paper.

* From the NY Times reporter that broke the Trump income tax story yesterday.

The Time I Found Donald Trump’s Tax Records in My Mailbox  

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/03/insider/the-time-i-found-donald-trumps-tax-records-in-my-mailbox.html?_r=0

The most shocking part of Donald Trump’s tax records isn’t the $916 million loss everyone’s talking about

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/10/02/the-most-shocking-part-of-donald-trumps-tax-records-isnt-the-916-million-loss-everyones-talking-about/

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So you pay above going rates for illegals , so noble of you. Why don't you hire a day laborer the correct way? 
I do hire them the correct way. I go to Home Depot, tell some guys what I want, ask them in their truck to follow me. I let them tell me the price; I rarely negotiate. I pay in cash. I often pay above the asked price if the job is done well. 

All of this is perfectly legal. Since these are always small jobs under $600, I can pay in cash and need not report it. They may be illegal immigrants but I have no responsibility to ask them if they are. 

 
jamny said:
No doubt that will be part of it and maybe even a major part of it but I have to think that having the religious right largely marginalized will not go unnoticed. The same goes for some other social issues. Trump seems to be LGBT friendly and his abortion stance is basically non-existent. He's made comments that I'm sure the NRA isn't too happy about either. If you can take out the man, he's a good candidate on paper.
Trump is a terrible candidate "on paper". He has pretty much zero issues that he is clearly defined on. The republican party having this loser as their candidate is the biggest joke in my lifetime.

 
Trump is a terrible candidate "on paper". He has pretty much zero issues that he is clearly defined on. The republican party having this loser as their candidate is the biggest joke in my lifetime.
this

apparently having held every conceivable position on every conceivable issue at one time or another is considered "moderate" :lmao:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
HellToupee said:
1st off I only have had hero in my life and that was my father. Trump is no political hero , wouldn't even say I'm a fan of his , but he's a disruptive force for change.

So you pay above going rates for illegals , so noble of you. Why don't you hire a day laborer the correct way? 
Not even a fan of his? Please.

Let's see...you started a safe space thread about Trump and wouldn't allow any negative comments in it. Then after people started criticizing him for things that you couldn't defend, you had a caps lock hissy fit, after which you deleted the thread.

I would hate to have seen what kind of meltdown you would have had if you actually were a fan of his.

 
Spin and more spin.  Why would Guiliani want to be Trump's flunky?  Or, for that matter why would Christie?  The left sees Trump as a moral bankrupt person who has people do work for him and doesn't pay them when the work is completed.  It wasn't due to Trump not being able to pay the workers, it was in his words, "good business sense not to pay them!"  This is what I don't understand about the working class voting for someone like Trump.  The right sees Trump as a business genius for taking advantage of loop holes.  If a loop hole exists it is silly not to use it your full advantage.  But, as long is it doesn't have any effect on me.   we are doomed

 
Bob Magaw said:
* From the NY Times reporter that broke the Trump income tax story yesterday.

The Time I Found Donald Trump’s Tax Records in My Mailbox  

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/03/insider/the-time-i-found-donald-trumps-tax-records-in-my-mailbox.html?_r=0
This was a really good read.  My favorite part was about the accountant who prepared the return.  His tax software didn't have enough spaces to put in that ginormous loss, so he entered what he could, then printed it out and loaded it into an IBM Selectric to type in the leading two digits.

 
Donald Trump’s More Accepting Views on Gay Issues Set Him Apart in G.O.P.

I'm not saying he doesn't go where the wind, and polling, takes him. So does Hillary. I'm just saying that if you really look at him, he is very different on social issues than the Republican Party is used to and wants as their representative.
I think that's true, and I think he deserves some credit for this. Unfortunately, there's two problems with it: first, it's countered by his authoritarian and irresponsible beliefs on a host of other issues, the sum of which, IMO, disqualify him for the Presidency all by themselves. 

Second, what difference are his personal thoughts about gays given his pledge to nominate the most socially conservative judges he can find? jamny, you can go to a wide number of Christian conservative websites (start with Hugh Hewitt if you'd like) and you will discover that while most of them aren't in love with Trump, they're supporting him because of the Supreme Court. 

 
Spin and more spin.  Why would Guiliani want to be Trump's flunky?  Or, for that matter why would Christie?  The left sees Trump as a moral bankrupt person who has people do work for him and doesn't pay them when the work is completed.  It wasn't due to Trump not being able to pay the workers, it was in his words, "good business sense not to pay them!"  This is what I don't understand about the working class voting for someone like Trump.  The right sees Trump as a business genius for taking advantage of loop holes.  If a loop hole exists it is silly not to use it your full advantage.  But, as long is it doesn't have any effect on me.   we are doomed
Republicans for awhile now have convinced poor people to vote against their better interests.

 
Yeah, all those poor inner-city voters that have voted democrat for decades are thriving these days.
I dunno man according to any conservative I've ever talked to they're all living large eating steak and lobster for dinner every night on my dime while only having to put in 3 hour work weeks.  Sounds like a pretty sweet gig.

 
Remember all those great republican talking points during mayoral and gubernatorial elections in areas with urban areas about how they were going to raise taxes and then reinvest that money into education and infrastructure upgrades in impoverished neighborhoods????    

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You seem to think only the Republican party is bull####ting the poor people.  Both parties are.
To some extent sure that's part of getting elected. Democrats at least "bull####" the poor. Republicans don't even bother yet some dude living off the government in a trailer seems to think that he shouldn't have voted for Obama because he's a muslim.

 
Two videos - Rolling around the mud scene AND a pig in a parking lot.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/02/donald-trumps-epic-meltdown-in-manheim-shouldnt-surprise-anyone/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTyXXo-8Gzc

The Meaning of Trump’s Early-Morning Tweet Storm

http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/the-meaning-of-trumps-early-morning-tweet-storm

"Why has Trump been unable to move on? The “unhinged” theory is the most persuasive explanation, but it needs stating carefully. Trump didn’t develop any new traits, or lose his mental balance, on Thursday night. Angrily lashing out at people who criticize him, regardless of the circumstances or consequences, has long been Trump’s default behavior. He didn’t become unhinged. He is unhinged. “This is just who he is,” Sam Stein, of the Huffington Post, pointed out on Friday’s edition of “Morning Joe.” “I know people think there’s this three-dimensional chess happening, and he’s trying to distract from another story . . . but it’s not that. I think he’s just personally aggrieved by what’s happening with this thing.”

"Stein is surely right. If Trump’s tweet had been part of a devilish new strategy to blacken Machado’s reputation and put the Clintonites on the defensive, his campaign would have followed up his tweets by providing at least some fresh evidence to back up his charges. It didn’t. On Friday morning, his campaign manager, Kellyanne Conway, was busy retweeting stories about the Clinton e-mail scandal from Politico and the Wall Street Journal. She didn’t mention Trump’s messages from earlier in the day—and that was perfectly understandable. Even before this week, women and Latinos were largely against Trump. In engaging in a weeklong war with Machado, he has given members of both groups, and of other groups, new reasons to dislike him. From a political perspective, there was nothing to be gained from extending the spat with Machado. It is a repeat of Trump’s damaging spat with the Khan family after the Democratic Convention."

"The point is Trump’s character. His original comments about Machado reeked of sexism and racism. His behavior this week has highlighted, anew, his impulsiveness and lack of discipline. As the Washington Post’s Paul Waldman pointed out on Friday, if Trump did somehow make it to the Oval Office, “he’d have to regularly set aside whatever impulsive reaction he has to a particular turn of events in favor of a long-term strategy that would be more beneficial to the country.” Could he do that? The answer is available on Twitter."

Analysis: Trump May Have Had the Worst Week in Presidential Campaign History

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/analysis-trump-may-have-had-worst-week-presidential-campaign-history-n658071

"The combination of multiple damaging stories, all made dramatically worse by the candidate's impulsive response, may be without precedent. It's as if Dukakis were photographed riding in the tank, saw the mocking news coverage, then climbed back into the tank and drove cross-country with Willie Horton riding shotgun as his own staff begged him to pull over."

"But even setting aside the vulgarity of the tweets, Trump's vengeful response affirmed — almost to the point of parody — Clinton's core charge that he was temperamentally unfit to manage the world's most powerful military.

"You can't tweet at 3 o'clock in the morning. Period. There's no excuse. Ever. Not if you're going to be president of the United States," former Speaker Newt Gingrich, another of Trump's most prominent supporters, said on Fox News."

"The good news for Trump is that there may be too many distinct negative stories surrounding his campaign for the average voter to fully process or a nightly news show to recap in depth. The expectations for his second debate, already minimal, are now on the ocean floor. But that's little consolation. At the exact moment Trump needed to be his best, with the most people watching and the stakes at their highest, he choked like never before."

 
Let's see...you started a safe space thread about Trump and wouldn't allow any negative comments in it. Then after people started criticizing him for things that you couldn't defend, you had a caps lock hissy fit, after which you deleted the thread.


I missed this.

 
That's why it's imperative that we import more poor people.How about we fix poverty issues here first
I just don't see this as an issue but I live practically in Canada. I'll let others weigh in on this who are way more passionate about this than I am.

I'm 100% certain Trump is not the answer to anything except punchlines.

 
I dunno man according to any conservative I've ever talked to they're all living large eating steak and lobster for dinner every night on my dime while only having to put in 3 hour work weeks.  Sounds like a pretty sweet gig.
If that's what poor people did the republicans would think they're smart and nominate them for President

 
The journey of a Trump true believer: 'Finally. Someone who thinks like me.'

She was a 52-year-old woman who had worked 20 years for the railroad, had once been a Democrat and was now a Republican, and counted herself among the growing swath of people who occupied the fringes of American politics but were increasingly becoming part of the mainstream. Like millions of others, she believed that President Barack Obama was a Muslim. And like so many she had gotten to know online through social media, she also believed that he was likely gay, that Michelle Obama could be a man, and that the Obama children were possibly kidnapped from a family now searching for them.

:eek:

 
The journey of a Trump true believer: 'Finally. Someone who thinks like me.'

She was a 52-year-old woman who had worked 20 years for the railroad, had once been a Democrat and was now a Republican, and counted herself among the growing swath of people who occupied the fringes of American politics but were increasingly becoming part of the mainstream. Like millions of others, she believed that President Barack Obama was a Muslim. And like so many she had gotten to know online through social media, she also believed that he was likely gay, that Michelle Obama could be a man, and that the Obama children were possibly kidnapped from a family now searching for them.

:eek:
Over/Under on missing teeth 4.5

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top