Tom Skerritt
Footballguy
Only advantage Donald seems to have is that he has a bigger pen1s. But not by much.
The way his kid handles the cyber is terrific.We learned from the debates that Donald has his 10 year old son handle his internets![]()
I think he has a broader knowledge base of makeups and bronzers.Only advantage Donald seems to have is that he has a bigger pen1s. But not by much.
I'm just mocking you for mocking me. HTH. 800+ pages of bickering and counting.The fact that you can't see the difference between all the other posts versus your endless back and forth with squis is shocking considering otherwise you seem like a fairly intelligent adult. But feel free to keep calling me out. It shows your true colors.OMG people are arguing and bickering in here!!! WHY AREN'T YOU DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT 3C's??????![]()
Where did I mock you? I simply stated that the constant back and forth between you and squis, and several people/sho, was getting old. And it was in response to someone else saying for you two to "get a room" or something to that effect. Notice how the others didn't say a thing? Yet you've felt the need to comment about it several times. It's almost Trump like. <- now that could very well be interpreted as mocking you.I'm just mocking you for mocking me. HTH. 800+ pages of bickering and counting.![]()
But you do or did hire illegals so you have no problem taking advantage of themHe's certainly allowed to avoid paying taxes, and to declare losses. But I don't think it's admirable to fire thousands of employees and stiff contractors and declare bankruptcy in order to horde wealth. I couldn't do that and live with myself. My earnings aren't based on taking advantage of other people.
This is one huge thread of guys playing slapdick. 800+ pages of bickering and counting.![]()
It's a typical message board politics thread.This is one huge thread of guys playing slapdick
Hmm. The Trump campaign running a post oak bluff? Under normal campaign management I could see it, but that move seems too complicated for the skill level displayed so far.Nothing is more obvious to me than the source for the leaked Trump taxes earlier today. It comes from the Trump camp and maybe even from Trump himself
The nearly billion dollar paper loss gave him a huge tax loophole, one big enough for him to squeeze his gigantic ego through and explains the reason for the "routine audit" and probably confirms the he hasn't paid a dime in Federal Income taxes in decades. We believe that this was released at 10pm on a Saturday night by the Trump campaign as it had finally come to a crossroads with the taxes and they needed to have this "leaked" before they went to release his current taxes, so that the no-income tax thing can be properly explained to a sheepish public.
I said that I don't think he'd make a good President but I also don't believe that a Trump Presidency would be the nightmare scenario that many envision it would be. But that wasn't my point. I think Hillary will win this easily and my vote is even less important here in NY. If I lived in a swing state, I wouldn't vote for him. I've heard people say that a vote for Gary Johnson isn't really a vote for the man but for either a third party or the Libertarian Party specifically. Can't I say the same thing for a vote for Trump? If I think it's a meaningless vote, and I do, wouldn't voting for him be a vote against the Establishment Republicans. Trump is clearly much more socially moderate than typical Republicans, and that's a direction I want the party to go to. I also do agree with lower corporate tax rates, tightening up immigration, fixing the problems with the VA and a few other things that Trump brings up.If you don't think Donald is a danger to the world as a president you are being naive. He is an easily manipulated impulsive egomaniac. He isn't fit to be in charge of a crosswalk.
You're only sending the message that you'll vote for the Republican nominee no matter who it is.I said that I don't think he'd make a good President but I also don't believe that a Trump Presidency would be the nightmare scenario that many envision it would be. But that wasn't my point. I think Hillary will win this easily and my vote is even less important here in NY. If I lived in a swing state, I wouldn't vote for him. I've heard people say that a vote for Gary Johnson isn't really a vote for the man but for either a third party or the Libertarian Party specifically. Can't I say the same thing for a vote for Trump? If I think it's a meaningless vote, and I do, wouldn't voting for him be a vote against the Establishment Republicans. Trump is clearly much more socially moderate than typical Republicans, and that's a direction I want the party to go to. I also do agree with lower corporate tax rates, tightening up immigration, fixing the problems with the VA and a few other things that Trump brings up.
In short, I don't think Trump will win but I do think a vote for him is a kick in the ### of the Establishment Republicans. It makes me feel like my vote has some meaning.
Lol you know nothing about what I do. I don't ask people if they're illegal. If I need day laborers for immediate work I pay them above going rates. If I and others didn't hire them they would be destitute, or if you got your wish, deported. I don't think I'm taking advantage at all; I work with illegal immigrants when I can in part because I want to help them succeed.But you do or did hire illegals so you have no problem taking advantage of them
But if Trump gets destroyed, it will only serve to empower a more right leaning party, imo. Trump is actually very moderate on lots of issues and that's where I think the party needs to go to succeed in the future.You're only sending the message that you'll vote for the Republican nominee no matter who it is.
Not surprising that a guy who never has been to a laundromat in his life and looks down at people who shop at Walmart as rabble would think that Tim paying day laborers at the going rate is taking advantage of them.But you do or did hire illegals so you have no problem taking advantage of them
While it's true that Trump falls to the left of establishment Republicans on social issues, that hasn't been even close to the center piece, or even a remotely important part, of his campaign. His message has been based around the loony far alt-right positions of xenophobia and authoritarianism, and if he comes close, those are the forces that are likely to ne emboldened as opposed to any type of moderation of the party establishment.But if Trump gets destroyed, it will only serve to empower a more right leaning party, imo. Trump is actually very moderate on lots of issues and that's where I think the party needs to go to succeed in the future.
No doubt that will be part of it and maybe even a major part of it but I have to think that having the religious right largely marginalized will not go unnoticed. The same goes for some other social issues. Trump seems to be LGBT friendly and his abortion stance is basically non-existent. He's made comments that I'm sure the NRA isn't too happy about either. If you can take out the man, he's a good candidate on paper.While it's true that Trump falls to the left of establishment Republicans on social issues, that hasn't been even close to the center piece, or even a remotely important part, of his campaign. His message has been based around the loony far alt-right positions of xenophobia and authoritarianism, and if he comes close, those are the forces that are likely to ne emboldened as opposed to any type of moderation of the party establishment.
Ehhh, his positions on the economy and foreign policy are unrealistic and genuinely dangerous, and those two spheres are hugely important. We can't simply return to early 20th century isolationism and economic protectionism.No doubt that will be part of it and maybe even a major part of it but I have to think that having the religious right largely marginalized will not go unnoticed. The same goes for some other social issues. Trump seems to be LGBT friendly and his abortion stance is basically non-existent. He's made comments that I'm sure the NRA isn't too happy about either. If you can take out the man, he's a good candidate on paper.
How much of his campaign would you estimate has been spent pushing these parts of his platform? Do you think they would be priorities in a Trump Administration?No doubt that will be part of it and maybe even a major part of it but I have to think that having the religious right largely marginalized will not go unnoticed. The same goes for some other social issues. Trump seems to be LGBT friendly and his abortion stance is basically non-existent. He's made comments that I'm sure the NRA isn't too happy about either. If you can take out the man, he's a good candidate on paper.
1st off I only have had hero in my life and that was my father. Trump is no political hero , wouldn't even say I'm a fan of his , but he's a disruptive force for change.Lol you know nothing about what I do. I don't ask people if they're illegal. If I need day laborers for immediate work I pay them above going rates. If I and others didn't hire them they would be destitute, or if you got your wish, deported. I don't think I'm taking advantage at all; I work with illegal immigrants when I can in part because I want to help them succeed.
I have NEVER taken advantage of anyone in my life and I certainly would never take glee in ripping people off the way your hero does.
Maybe because he follows the example set by Donald Trump? All Tim's doing is taking advantage of loopholes in the system. It's not Tim's fault that the law turns a blind eye.Why don't you hire a day laborer the correct way?
This is a stretchBut if Trump gets destroyed, it will only serve to empower a more right leaning party, imo. Trump is actually very moderate on lots of issues and that's where I think the party needs to go to succeed in the future.
If you can take out the radioactivity, Chernobyl is a good nuclear reactor on paper.No doubt that will be part of it and maybe even a major part of it but I have to think that having the religious right largely marginalized will not go unnoticed. The same goes for some other social issues. Trump seems to be LGBT friendly and his abortion stance is basically non-existent. He's made comments that I'm sure the NRA isn't too happy about either. If you can take out the man, he's a good candidate on paper.
I do hire them the correct way. I go to Home Depot, tell some guys what I want, ask them in their truck to follow me. I let them tell me the price; I rarely negotiate. I pay in cash. I often pay above the asked price if the job is done well.So you pay above going rates for illegals , so noble of you. Why don't you hire a day laborer the correct way?
Trump is a terrible candidate "on paper". He has pretty much zero issues that he is clearly defined on. The republican party having this loser as their candidate is the biggest joke in my lifetime.jamny said:No doubt that will be part of it and maybe even a major part of it but I have to think that having the religious right largely marginalized will not go unnoticed. The same goes for some other social issues. Trump seems to be LGBT friendly and his abortion stance is basically non-existent. He's made comments that I'm sure the NRA isn't too happy about either. If you can take out the man, he's a good candidate on paper.
thisTrump is a terrible candidate "on paper". He has pretty much zero issues that he is clearly defined on. The republican party having this loser as their candidate is the biggest joke in my lifetime.
Not even a fan of his? Please.HellToupee said:1st off I only have had hero in my life and that was my father. Trump is no political hero , wouldn't even say I'm a fan of his , but he's a disruptive force for change.
So you pay above going rates for illegals , so noble of you. Why don't you hire a day laborer the correct way?
Donald Trump’s More Accepting Views on Gay Issues Set Him Apart in G.O.P.this
apparently having held every conceivable position on every conceivable issue at one time or another is considered "moderate"![]()
He didn't get the nom for any of that. He got it for building a wall.Donald Trump’s More Accepting Views on Gay Issues Set Him Apart in G.O.P.
I'm not saying he doesn't go where the wind, and polling, takes him. So does Hillary. I'm just saying that if you really look at him, he is very different on social issues than the Republican Party is used to and wants as their representative.
This was a really good read. My favorite part was about the accountant who prepared the return. His tax software didn't have enough spaces to put in that ginormous loss, so he entered what he could, then printed it out and loaded it into an IBM Selectric to type in the leading two digits.Bob Magaw said:* From the NY Times reporter that broke the Trump income tax story yesterday.
The Time I Found Donald Trump’s Tax Records in My Mailbox
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/03/insider/the-time-i-found-donald-trumps-tax-records-in-my-mailbox.html?_r=0
I think that's true, and I think he deserves some credit for this. Unfortunately, there's two problems with it: first, it's countered by his authoritarian and irresponsible beliefs on a host of other issues, the sum of which, IMO, disqualify him for the Presidency all by themselves.Donald Trump’s More Accepting Views on Gay Issues Set Him Apart in G.O.P.
I'm not saying he doesn't go where the wind, and polling, takes him. So does Hillary. I'm just saying that if you really look at him, he is very different on social issues than the Republican Party is used to and wants as their representative.
Republicans for awhile now have convinced poor people to vote against their better interests.Spin and more spin. Why would Guiliani want to be Trump's flunky? Or, for that matter why would Christie? The left sees Trump as a moral bankrupt person who has people do work for him and doesn't pay them when the work is completed. It wasn't due to Trump not being able to pay the workers, it was in his words, "good business sense not to pay them!" This is what I don't understand about the working class voting for someone like Trump. The right sees Trump as a business genius for taking advantage of loop holes. If a loop hole exists it is silly not to use it your full advantage. But, as long is it doesn't have any effect on me. we are doomed
Yeah, all those poor inner-city voters that have voted democrat for decades are thriving these days.Republicans for awhile now have convinced poor people to vote against their better interests.
Poor people have it pretty ####ty everywhere not just in the inner cities, no?Yeah, all those poor inner-city voters that have voted democrat for decades are thriving these days.
I dunno man according to any conservative I've ever talked to they're all living large eating steak and lobster for dinner every night on my dime while only having to put in 3 hour work weeks. Sounds like a pretty sweet gig.Yeah, all those poor inner-city voters that have voted democrat for decades are thriving these days.
You seem to think only the Republican party is bull####ting the poor people. Both parties are.Poor people have it pretty ####ty everywhere not just in the inner cities, no?
To some extent sure that's part of getting elected. Democrats at least "bull####" the poor. Republicans don't even bother yet some dude living off the government in a trailer seems to think that he shouldn't have voted for Obama because he's a muslim.You seem to think only the Republican party is bull####ting the poor people. Both parties are.
That's why it's imperative that we import more poor people.How about we fix poverty issues here firstPoor people have it pretty ####ty everywhere not just in the inner cities, no?
Let's see...you started a safe space thread about Trump and wouldn't allow any negative comments in it. Then after people started criticizing him for things that you couldn't defend, you had a caps lock hissy fit, after which you deleted the thread.
I just don't see this as an issue but I live practically in Canada. I'll let others weigh in on this who are way more passionate about this than I am.That's why it's imperative that we import more poor people.How about we fix poverty issues here first
If that's what poor people did the republicans would think they're smart and nominate them for PresidentI dunno man according to any conservative I've ever talked to they're all living large eating steak and lobster for dinner every night on my dime while only having to put in 3 hour work weeks. Sounds like a pretty sweet gig.
Over/Under on missing teeth 4.5The journey of a Trump true believer: 'Finally. Someone who thinks like me.'
She was a 52-year-old woman who had worked 20 years for the railroad, had once been a Democrat and was now a Republican, and counted herself among the growing swath of people who occupied the fringes of American politics but were increasingly becoming part of the mainstream. Like millions of others, she believed that President Barack Obama was a Muslim. And like so many she had gotten to know online through social media, she also believed that he was likely gay, that Michelle Obama could be a man, and that the Obama children were possibly kidnapped from a family now searching for them.
![]()