You mean somebody isn't reading this to you?Stopped reading there.
This.Also if paying no taxes is what comes out of the returns that's a win for Trump, because what he's really likely hiding are the entities and people he is in business with. If Trump can send out a snip saying hey look no taxes, secret's out, no big deal, now you can stop asking about the returns, arguably that's a win and lets him off the hook.
I'm pretty sure the NYT said it was a Trump Tower envelope.Not to mention you can write whatever you want in the "return address" spot on any mailing label. That said, I don't think it is outside the realm of possibility that it did actually come from the campaign itself.
This is a bit of a trap Hillary should just avoid. Donald is pretty vile but I don't give two ####s if he pays taxes or not. So many better things to hit him on I would just ignore it.I personally wouldn't rule out the campaign itself (with Trump's blessing). Paying zero taxes is pretty much the least offensive thing about him, IMO.
Typed on envelope, so the sender was purposefully hiding the scrawl.I'm pretty sure the NYT said it was a Trump Tower envelope.
In any case, the NYT never said this was all that was in the envelope. They may have the federal forms for all we know and not published them do this very reason or be holding them back for a more complete picture.
Its a short list of people that would have these forms and most are either located in Trump Tower or with Maples. I wouldn't be shocked if it was whoever does her taxes now.
Hillary and her team has just been given a gift. It would a major missed opportunity not to run with it. You may not care if he hasn't paid taxes the last 20 years due to some loophole, but it will matter to a lot of average working class Americans who similarly can't take advantage and avoid taxes.This is a bit of a trap Hillary should just avoid. Donald is pretty vile but I don't give two ####s if he pays taxes or not. So many better things to hit him on I would just ignore it.
Agree 100%. The taxes are a distraction from the other, and IMO more important, stuff.This is a bit of a trap Hillary should just avoid. Donald is pretty vile but I don't give two ####s if he pays taxes or not. So many better things to hit him on I would just ignore it.
Losing a billion and writing off a billion are two separate concepts. How was the money lost? Is it depreciation?The trap would be her running with the "may not have paid taxes in 25 years" thing, only to find out later he did in fact pay taxes.
A much safer attack which should resonate almost as strongly is that HE LOST A BILLION DOLLARS
Her tech people should have already started a "Billion Dollar Loser" meme and flooded social media with it. It would serve the dual-purpose of showing what a joke he is and hitting him where he is most sensitive.
#BILLIONDOLLARLOSER #BDLTRUMP
It's Rush--he's probably high again. You'll know if he is because his next attack will be on the liberal druggies.lol that article HT posted reads like Trump at a debate: jump all over the place, make no sense whatsoever, then whine about being treated unfairly.
For political purposes it doesn't matter. He declared a $ billion loss, he's a #billiondollarloserLosing a billion and writing off a billion are two separate concepts. How was the money lost? Is it depreciation?
Politically, it may not, but in reality everyone does their best to have paper losses - he might turn the tables back on Hillary if she attacks him on it, as I'm sure the Cinton's have paper losses as well.For political purposes it doesn't matter. He declared a $ billion loss, he's a #billiondollarloser
Wow what a terrific anecdote I think we can go ahead and shut this one down folks!Had an encounter at the grocery store with a Trump supporter this am. He was stocking the shelves (shocking I know) and was talking to a customer I assume he knew about how crooked Hillary was and how Bill cheated on her and how it made him sick. This older lady walked by and said something to the effect of "you shouldn't be so loud about your really negative opinions since some of the customers don't agree." He went on for a minute about his rights, god's on his side, etc. The lady was calm as could be and just walked away saying, "I hope you have a nice day and stop saying such negative things about people you don't even know."
So Trumpers hate Clinton because Bill cheated on Hillary too? This is a big deal? When they support scum like Trump, I'm really shuked that they think cheating is an issue at all.
I'm not sure I understand the inside job theory unless this precipitates him releasing his tax returns. Otherwise, this just creates the impression that whatever Trump is hiding is worse than not paying federal income tax for nearly 2 decades.I personally wouldn't rule out the campaign itself (with Trump's blessing). Paying zero taxes is pretty much the least offensive thing about him, IMO.
The thing is we can find out if the Clintons had losses because she released her tax returns.Politically, it may not, but in reality everyone does their best to have paper losses - he might turn the tables back on Hillary if she attacks him on it, as I'm sure the Cinton's have paper losses as well.
I don't understand it either. Before this was released I assumed Trump had actually paid taxes since 1995. Now it's possible he hasn't.I'm not sure I understand the inside job theory unless this precipitates him releasing his tax returns. Otherwise, this just creates the impression that whatever Trump is hiding is worse than not paying federal income tax for nearly 2 decades.
Do most people then file bankruptcy to get rid of those losses and avoid taxes for the next two decades?Politically, it may not, but in reality everyone does their best to have paper losses - he might turn the tables back on Hillary if she attacks him on it, as I'm sure the Cinton's have paper losses as well.
Well, to you and I, and most people, who are going to question Trump's narrative, yes. I'm not so sure that those inclined to listen to him would make that same assumption. He's playing to the lowest common denominator and has been all along.I'm not sure I understand the inside job theory unless this precipitates him releasing his tax returns. Otherwise, this just creates the impression that whatever Trump is hiding is worse than not paying federal income tax for nearly 2 decades.
And why should we care though? There are so many ways of shielding income from taxes that the whole thing is irrelevant. This conversation is actually going the way I thought it would should Trump's taxes ever be released - OMG he lost a billion dollars! Well, likely he didn't, he sheltered a billion dollars. OMG he must be broke! Well, no, tax forms don't really show net worth.The thing is we can find out if the Clintons had losses because she released her tax returns.
You don't get rid of losses in bankruptcy - you get rid of debt.Do most people then file bankruptcy to get rid of those losses and avoid taxes for the next two decades?
Well, if Julian Assange and truepundit says it's true, who are we to question it?https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/782906224937410562
Hillary Clinton on Assange: "can't we just drone this guy"
Minor point here if we're doing comparisons - the Clinton Foundation is redoing some number (5?) of years of tax returns because of unrevealed millions in foreign donations.The thing is we can find out if the Clintons had losses because she released her tax returns.
This is the same person that bragged about murdering Ghaddafi on television. Not too outlandish an idea that she'd talk about Assange that way either.Well, if Julian Assange and truepundit says it's true, who are we to question it?
We know the Trump Foundation solicited donations in states other than New York, and at some point they might have solicited online. Would the Foundation have to go through a similar registration process in all states that they failed to do in New York?
If only...https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/782906224937410562
Hillary Clinton on Assange: "can't we just drone this guy"
I think if WL does this they need to connect the source cable to the story, or describe the source, which I don't see there.https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/782906224937410562
Hillary Clinton on Assange: "can't we just drone this guy"
I don't necessarily disagree about the usefulness of releasing tax returns, but I think Trump hurt himself politically. This would have all been forgotten if he released them back in April or May. Now it's a big story a month before the election. Maybe candidates release tax returns so they can control the story.And why should we care though? There are so many ways of shielding income from taxes that the whole thing is irrelevant. This conversation is actually going the way I thought it would should Trump's taxes ever be released - OMG he lost a billion dollars! Well, likely he didn't, he sheltered a billion dollars. OMG he must be broke! Well, no, tax forms don't really show net worth.
The whole idea of releasing taxes is stupid for both candidates.
You don't get rid of losses in bankruptcy - you get rid of debt.
Find something to work with. The tax angle is the weakest I ever seen in a presidential election. Everyone with functioning brain cells tries to pay as little as possible. If they could everyone would get to zero or even get a refund.Trump speaking now, taking credit for using the tax system currently in place to save his company.
I'm open to the possibility that the Trump campaign is incompetent.I'm not sure I understand the inside job theory unless this precipitates him releasing his tax returns. Otherwise, this just creates the impression that whatever Trump is hiding is worse than not paying federal income tax for nearly 2 decades.
No idea how that would work.We know the Trump Foundation solicited donations in states other than New York, and at some point they might have solicited online. Would the Foundation have to go through a similar registration process in all states that they failed to do in New York?
Intuitively this makes sense to me but this would make it pretty foolish to actually put the Trump Towers as a return address. Unless the sender was, you know, foolish.I'm open to the possibility that the Trump campaign is incompetent.
They tried pushing the "104-page financial disclosure" Trump filled out when he entered the race as a better source of information than his tax returns. Conway tried real hard to get that one to stick
I think they thought they would be able to blame the media for rigging the game and illegally publishing tax documents against Trump's will, further pushing Trump as an outsider that the system is trying to stop.
How about finding out about all of his foreign investments like Cuba, possibly Iran and Russia and find out where all of his financial interests may lie? Maybe there's a financial reason why some of his political positions are friendly to Russia and why Putin is so pro-Trump.Find something to work with. The tax angle is the weakest I ever seen in a presidential election. Everyone with functioning brain cells tries to pay as little as possible. If they could everyone would get to zero or even get a refund.
Trump campaign doing something foolish? No way...Intuitively this makes sense to me but this would make it pretty foolish to actually put the Trump Towers as a return address. Unless the sender was, you know, foolish.
Don't think that will come off tax returns though.How about finding out about all of his foreign investments like Cuba, possibly Iran and Russia and find out where all of his financial interests may lie? Maybe there's a financial reason why some of his political positions are friendly to Russia and why Putin is so pro-Trump.
And yet he's completely wrapped in it and doing a speech on it. This guy never met a briar patch he wouldn't jump into.Find something to work with. The tax angle is the weakest I ever seen in a presidential election. Everyone with functioning brain cells tries to pay as little as possible. If they could everyone would get to zero or even get a refund.
There was a piece on Vox a couple weeks ago that basically pleaded with the media and voters to stop looking for the master plan and genius in the Trump campaign. They really do not know what they are doing.Intuitively this makes sense to me but this would make it pretty foolish to actually put the Trump Towers as a return address. Unless the sender was, you know, foolish.
They go back to the trailer parks, watch Trump's new cable news network, buy his crap, and complain for the next four years. The people at those rallies are literally the very bottom of the barrel of our society. Ideally, the Republican Party realizes that pandering to these folks is a great way to ensure defeat, and swings back to the center.What's going to happen the day after Hillary wins? Seems like there is more of a rage now than I ever recall. There are bad people on both sides but almost daily at a Trump rally people chant "Trump that #####!" or something about putting her in jail etc. Will they just slither away?
See, I don't think the problem is the 'bleeding and divisiveness'.I missed the Obama kids thing, but yeah, that's outrageous too. I'm just commenting on the never-ending petty circle-jerking - you'd think your prostates would be exhausted by now. You know, Trump is a terrible candidate, we all get that. The sooner you realize that the people who got him there have legitimate concerns, the sooner we can stop the bleeding and divisiveness. Those of you engaged a bashing and calling his supporters stupid are contributing to the problem, not helping to solve it.
They go back to the shark pool and the "Obama--Worst President Ever" thread.What's going to happen the day after Hillary wins? Seems like there is more of a rage now than I ever recall. There are bad people on both sides but almost daily at a Trump rally people chant "Trump that #####!" or something about putting her in jail etc. Will they just slither away?
Silly me, I thought Democrats were the very bottom of the barrel of our society.They go back to the trailer parks, watch Trump's new cable news network, buy his crap, and complain for the next four years. The people at those rallies are literally the very bottom of the barrel of our society. Ideally, the Republican Party realizes that pandering to these folks is a great way to ensure defeat, and swings back to the center.
It has been said that Hannity and Limbaugh do not want Trump to really win. It would be so much better for their ratings to have these bottom feeders tuning in everyday to listen about Hillary killing America. They can sell their gold and other #### to this mouth breathers. If Trump wins the only thing that Hannity and Limbaugh can do is go after Pelosi again? Such a racket.They go back to the trailer parks, watch Trump's new cable news network, buy his crap, and complain for the next four years. The people at those rallies are literally the very bottom of the barrel of our society. Ideally, the Republican Party realizes that pandering to these folks is a great way to ensure defeat, and swings back to the center.
I'm sure they would feel the same way about you.See, I don't think the problem is the 'bleeding and divisiveness'.
I think the problem is his supporters.
I don't think they are good hearted people with real concerns, and blah freaking blah.
I think they are people that have gotten better at hiding their hatred of anyone that doesn't look like them, and are also not bright, and to boot: really gullible.