cstu
Footballguy
"Help, I've fallen and I can't vote for Trump!"Particularly considering how heavily his support is based upon seniors.
"Help, I've fallen and I can't vote for Trump!"Particularly considering how heavily his support is based upon seniors.
What's lucky for this country is that they seem concentrated in states that the GOP would have won regardless.I really think you guys are underestimating how much more enthusiasm there is on his side.
Trump in Nevada discussing Putin: "I don’t love, I don’t hate, we’ll see how it works, we’ll see."
Pence last night, same issue: Putin "small & bullying leader"
I don't really understand "voter intimidation". So some knuckledragger is standing outside of the polling place - how's he going to know who I am voting for? And even if it is in a heavily Democratic area, what's he going to do?Yea, but he is encouraging people to watch the polling stations and make sure things are going ok. So voter intimidation basically.
It's pretty much code for stop blacks and hispanics from voting.I don't really understand "voter intimidation". So some knuckledragger is standing outside of the polling place - how's he going to know who I am voting for? And even if it is in a heavily Democratic area, what's he going to do?
The polls account for this now, they've switched over to likely voters.I really think you guys are underestimating how much more enthusiasm there is on his side.
And those damn Moooooslims.It's pretty much code for stop blacks and hispanics from voting.
Are those the only issues you think the SC deals with?don't get the people whose sole factor is supreme court justices. does abortion and gay marriage really affect their lives that much on a daily basis? the 2nd amendment isn't going anywhere. what the #### are they afraid of?
I get that but a bunch of Trumpkins showing up is going to make those people not vote?It's pretty much code for stop blacks and hispanics from voting.
Of course not, and they'll get arrested pretty much immediately if they try to do anything at all. But they're also not the sharpest tools in the shed, and neither is Trump himself, so...I get that but a bunch of Trumpkins showing up is going to make those people not vote?
538 has a good article on how he's underperforming among whites even now and how that group is actually trending away from him. Even in a Fox Poll he can't get to the magic +22 number for whites and I have to assume that would be the poll showing the largest enthusiasm gap. If anything at this point, we're closer to his firewall completely breaking versus some magical non-educated white turnout.The polls account for this now, they've switched over to likely voters.
My two big remaining concerns are:
(1) how people's brains go through all sorts of contortions to avoid having to confront the fact that they've been taken by a scam, which means he he generally doesn't shed support once he firms it up and can really only go up from here if Clinton slips up over the next month somehow, and
(2) The possibility that he unexpectedly takes one or both of Wisconsin and Michigan, where he's a lot closer than previous GOP candidates but the states haven't been polled as much since they're not usually thought of as swing states. Either one of them plus Florida would probably do it for him, assuming he also wins Ohio. If he wins them both and also somehow wins Colorado he could even afford to lose Florida.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/trumps-doing-worse-than-romney-did-among-white-voters/Trump’s less-than-overwhelming margins among white voters in the polls listed above are a big reason why all five surveys showed him trailing Hillary Clinton overall. In fact, Trump would be losing by a larger margin, but third-party candidates are getting support from younger and minority voters, so that Clinton is slightly underperforming Obama among these groups. But the magnitude of Clinton’s struggles with young and nonwhite voters isn’t anywhere big enough to cancel out Trump’s relatively poor showing among white voters.
Perhaps, it would be better news for Trump if he were at least trending in the right direction with white voters. But he’s moved backward compared with polls back in May and early June. Back then, Trump led Clinton by 17 percentage points, on average, among white voters. In other words, the longer white voters have had a chance to listen to Trump’s message, the more they have been put off by it as a group.
Do you remember the posters on this forum regarding the 2008 election complaining about The New Black Panthers? NBP was two guys who stood in front of one inner city polling place in a precinct that was about 100% African American. The press interviewed people and couldn't find one that said it kept them from voting, but some conservatives here pointed to it and have continued to mention it over the years as proof of Democrats fixing the election.I don't really understand "voter intimidation". So some knuckledragger is standing outside of the polling place - how's he going to know who I am voting for? And even if it is in a heavily Democratic area, what's he going to do?
Only black people are intimidating. HTH.Do you remember the posters on this forum in 2012 complaining about The New Black Panthers? NBP was two guys who stood in front of one inner city polling place in a precinct that was about 100% African American. The press interviewed people and couldn't find one that said it kept them from voting, but some conservatives pointed it to it and have continued to mention it over the years as proof of Democrats fixing the election.
Only black people are intimidating. HTH.
"If he could only not be himself for the next month!!!!"538 has a good article on how he's underperforming among whites even now and how that group is actually trending away from him. Even in a Fox Poll he can't get to the magic +22 number for whites and I have to assume that would be the poll showing the largest enthusiasm gap. If anything at this point, we're closer to his firewall completely breaking versus some magical non-educated white turnout.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/trumps-doing-worse-than-romney-did-among-white-voters/
Probably a little hyperbole in that headline, but sounds like things are getting a little tense.Four weeks into the NFL season and four weeks from Election Day, amid an increasingly politicized league confronting on-field protests every Sunday, a straw poll of 43 players by B/R Mag shows:
20 of 22 black NFL players plan to vote for Hillary Clinton.
2 of 22 black NFL players plan to vote for Donald J. Trump.
21 of 21 white NFL players plan to vote for Trump.
Just when I thought my respect for Tom Brady could get no lower, he supports Trump.21 of 21 white NFL players plan to vote for Trump.
yes, that's what i thinkAre those the only issues you think the SC deals with?
Anyone?Grace Under Pressure said:For many pages now this thread has a significant lack of anyone actually willfully admitting their plans to vote for this dolt with just about a month remaining. Compared to the 2012 Romney thread, it's a stark difference.
I get the need to endorse a particular candidate. But how much effect does this really have? Those who read The Atlantic were probably going to vote for Hillary anyway.
Uh, that's actually pretty good.Jeremy said:2 of 22 black NFL players plan to vote for Donald J. Trump.
I'm afraid of the court being delegitimized if the Republicans successfully block the Democrats from passing any justices going forward.joffer said:don't get the people whose sole factor is supreme court justices. does abortion and gay marriage really affect their lives that much on a daily basis? the 2nd amendment isn't going anywhere. what the #### are they afraid of?
I highly doubt the mentioning part was about fixing the election but more like voter intimidation but keep carrying on.squistion said:Do you remember the posters on this forum regarding the 2008 election complaining about The New Black Panthers? NBP was two guys who stood in front of one inner city polling place in a precinct that was about 100% African American. The press interviewed people and couldn't find one that said it kept them from voting, but some conservatives here pointed to it and have continued to mention it over the years as proof of Democrats fixing the election.
And the Hillary voter said he couldn't be friends with someone who votes for Trump. Ah, gotta love the "tolerant" people.Jeremy said:Trump is tearing the NFL apart
Probably a little hyperbole in that headline, but sounds like things are getting a little tense.![]()
Yeah, it's so weird that a black guy woud have a problem hanging out with someone who wants to elect a guy with a documented history of racism.And the Hillary voter said he couldn't be friends with someone who votes for Trump. Ah, gotta love the "tolerant" people.
As of right now, the left is favored to retake the Senate, so chances are pretty good that they end up having screwed themselves by effing around and refusing to consider Garland.I'm afraid of the court being delegitimized if the Republicans successfully block the Democrats from passing any justices going forward.
It's good that you put tolerant in quotes, otherwise I'd think you don't know what the word means.And the Hillary voter said he couldn't be friends with someone who votes for Trump. Ah, gotta love the "tolerant" people.
It's no surprise the people with the guns are the ones shooting themselves in the foot.
Hillary taking everyone's guns and changing The Constitution so Obama can be President again, for life. I #### you not, I heard this from one of Donald's supporters recently -- in person, not on talk radio.joffer said:don't get the people whose sole factor is supreme court justices. does abortion and gay marriage really affect their lives that much on a daily basis? the 2nd amendment isn't going anywhere. what the #### are they afraid of?
The GOP Senate has already shown that they will do anything they can to block any Democrat being named to the Supreme Court. They believe they have a permanent right to a Supreme Court majority. Since the rules require 60 votes to move forward on a USSC nomination vote they can easily block any nominee. It's very clear that they will pay no political price for doing this. Why would anyone think they'll stop?I'm afraid of the court being delegitimized if the Republicans successfully block the Democrats from passing any justices going forward.
Is there a real Hillary or is she just a George Soros creation?Real Hillary or hologram Hillary?
I have to believe they would pay some political price if they continue to stonewall in a Hillary administration. Plus Hillary would just have Justice Kennedy assassinated to get a 4-3 majority.The GOP Senate has already shown that they will do anything they can to block any Democrat being named to the Supreme Court. They believe they have a permanent right to a Supreme Court majority. Since the rules require 60 votes to move forward on a USSC nomination vote they can easily block any nominee. It's very clear that they will pay no political price for doing this. Why would anyone think they'll stop?
The majority dems in the senate would go nuclear option in that case and confirm with a simple majority. And that's how Ralph Nader winds up on the Supreme Court.I have to believe they would pay some political price if they continue to stonewall in a Hillary administration. Plus Hillary would just have Justice Kennedy assassinated to get a 4-3 majority.
This should be common sense in this case, but not believing in the Holocaust is not indicative of being pro-Trump, it's indicative of being a moron who just happens to support Trump.
A large chunk of his base are morons who will vote Trump.This should be common sense in this case, but not believing in the Holocaust is not indicative of being pro-Trump, it's indicative of being a moron who just happens to support Trump.
Okay then Sho. Also not holocaust deniers.A large chunk of his base are morons who will vote Trump.
It's very weird considering he's been running a pretty smart campaign aside from this oversight.I want Hillary to float BO as a Supreme Court nominee.
It does seem weird that Trump isn't playing that note. Every conservative that is disenchanted with him - and there are a few - needs to be reminded that there is a SC opening.
He doesn't actually care about putting a conservative on the Court, or a liberal for that matter. IMO he's at least 50% likely to appoint a non-lawyer who supports his weird notions of authoritarian executive power.I want Hillary to float BO as a Supreme Court nominee.
It does seem weird that Trump isn't playing that note. Every conservative that is disenchanted with him - and there are a few - needs to be reminded that there is a SC opening.