I went back and forth as to whether I should share this video in this thread as although it purports to be a review of the movie Dune, it is in all actuality a treatise on Frank Herbert's underlying philosophy and the fact (contention?) that Dune was his response to Isaac Asimov's Foundation trilogy. It's also pretty damn long, starting with a brief mention of the Roman Empire, moving then to The Whig Interpretation of History. If you haven't picked up on it, it's long. Very long. BTW, this is described as a "short excerpt" of a forthcoming video.
But, I found it fascinating. Although I've read Dune (and most if not all of the sequels) and Foundation, it never clicked with me how diametrically opposed the two books were. But when you stop and think about it, these books are in part a product of the times in which the authors lived. Times that, much like today, had competing philosphies (political, economic, etc.), all of which contribute to the stories they are telling.
TL;DW
"Asimov was a stout and devout New Deal believer." Foundation is "Whigs in space"
Herbert's Dune was intended to subvert Foundation.
The video makes some very interesting points as he works through the stories in parallel, and lays out the fundamental differences and the outcomes they entail (e.g., both with galactic empires, planet locales on the far fringe of the empire).
Anyway, I thought it was interesting and thought I'd share it.
Foundations of Dune