What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

****OFFICIAL DYNASTY TRADES**** (11 Viewers)

Superflex league I am rebuilding in.  Deep 40 man rosters.

Gave up: Prescott, 2023 3rd

Received: Fields, 2023 1st

I now have 8 2023 1sts, 4 2023 2nds, 2 2023 3rds.  It's just a fun league that I went all in on 2023 for.

 
Birdie048 said:
12 Team 1QB PPR (can start 5 WR)   I am in year 2 of complete rebuild (currently have 5 picks in Top 20 for 2023)

I gave up 2.11 & 3.03 

I got Wash WR Curtis Samuel 

I had that sitting there for 5 days.  They accepted it this morning .. I know Dotson was picked up.  I had a chance to revoke the deal but felt it was worth it.  I also know McLaurin is a UFA next year.  He is not at voluntary workouts while contract extension discussion underway.  Wash Cap # are an issue partly due to Wentz so if he has to wait after the season he will be more expensive.  I think Wash won't be able to afford him.  Just thinking potential ideas.  

I think Dotson needs time to show he can contribute.  Samuel is my buy low effort at it now. 
Click to expand...
My 2 cents Is that Samuel is just worth 1 of those 2 picks, not both. 

 
Birdie048 said:
So this was the equiv of giving up a Late 23 1st & mid/late 24 1st for a Top 4 pick.

So possible scenario example...  1.11 & 1.08 picks for 1.03?  

Top 4 in 2023 is a valuable asset.  
Click to expand...
Exactly. If one assumes that having 7 of the 1st 13 picks in 2023 will improve my team by 2024. 

And as mentioned, this should lock up the top 5 picks in 2023. I’m gonna Vince McMahon strut to the draft queue & set up camp for a fun little shopping spree. 

 
smbkrypt24 said:
Superflex league I am rebuilding in.  Deep 40 man rosters.

Gave up: Prescott, 2023 3rd

Received: Fields, 2023 1st

I now have 8 2023 1sts, 4 2023 2nds, 2 2023 3rds.  It's just a fun league that I went all in on 2023 for.
Click to expand...
I like it. Though with 7x firsts already I may have been tempted to keep Dak. & build around him. 

that said, it’s fair, and if the Fields gamble pays off you’re still set up for a nice rebuild. 

 
Hot Sauce Guy said:
I like it. Though with 7x firsts already I may have been tempted to keep Dak. & build around him. 

that said, it’s fair, and if the Fields gamble pays off you’re still set up for a nice rebuild. 
Click to expand...
Thanks for the reply/opinion.

Prescott also greatly improved my roster for this year so the idea was to hopefully lower my points this year for some sporadic Fields points and hopefully he develops, but either way improve my 2023 1st.

 
Birdie048 said:
Is that classified as ABUSE?  Nice work.  Search and Destroy effort to get another Top 5 pick in 2023
Click to expand...
Maybe the other way.  Basically he gave up a 1st rounder to move up 5 or 6 picks when he already has the top 4 picks anyway.  Just not really sure what this gains him in the big picture.

 
Gally said:
Maybe the other way.  Basically he gave up a 1st rounder to move up 5 or 6 picks when he already has the top 4 picks anyway.  Just not really sure what this gains him in the big picture.
Click to expand...
But that’s incorrect. I didn’t have the top 4 picks anyway. 

That was the gain.

This team was an usurper to that plan. They would have snuck in at 1, 2, or 3, foiling my ability to have the top 4 picks. 

And your math is wonky. Moving from 1.11-1.12 to 1.02-1.03 = 5-6? 

I’ll likely move up 8-10 picks. I paid a ‘24 1st to do it. It wasn’t a bargain but I don’t think I got robbed as you suggest. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
12 team ppr QB-2RB-3WR-TE-FL
 

Johnson, Diontae PIT WR

Year 2022 Draft Pick 5.12

For

Fant, Noah SEA TE

Year 2022 Draft Pick 2.04

Year 2023 Round 2 Draft Pick from Team V

 
Dr. Octopus said:
12 team ppr QB-2RB-3WR-TE-FL
 

Johnson, Diontae PIT WR

Year 2022 Draft Pick 5.12

For

Fant, Noah SEA TE

Year 2022 Draft Pick 2.04

Year 2023 Round 2 Draft Pick from Team V
Click to expand...
If the ‘23 2nd is likely to be early I like the return for DJ.

I’m less optimistic than many about the future of that PIT offense with Trubisky/Pickett behind center.

Even if the ‘23 2nd is later I still like the deal for the team getting Fant+picks. 

 
Hot Sauce Guy said:
If the ‘23 2nd is likely to be early I like the return for DJ.

I’m less optimistic than many about the future of that PIT offense with Trubisky/Pickett behind center.

Even if the ‘23 2nd is later I still like the deal for the team getting Fant+picks. 
Click to expand...
The team that the pick is from “earned” the 1.02 last season but his team is better than that on “paper”.

 
Dr. Octopus said:
12 team ppr QB-2RB-3WR-TE-FL
 

Johnson, Diontae PIT WR

Year 2022 Draft Pick 5.12

For

Fant, Noah SEA TE

Year 2022 Draft Pick 2.04

Year 2023 Round 2 Draft Pick from Team V
Click to expand...
Easily DJ side for me.  This is very light for him. I would give this package up in every league I am in.

 
Hot Sauce Guy said:
But that’s incorrect. I didn’t have the top 4 picks anyway. 

That was the gain.

This team was an usurper to that plan. They would have snuck in at 1, 2, or 3, foiling my ability to have the top 4 picks. 

And your math is wonky. Moving from 1.11-1.12 to 1.02-1.03 = 5-6? 

I’ll likely move up 8-10 picks. I paid a ‘24 1st to do it. It wasn’t a bargain but I don’t think I got robbed as you suggest. 
Click to expand...
Your making assumptions on the exact puck numbers.  Educated assumptions sure but the pick you got may end up pick 5 or 6 instead of pick 2 or 3.  The pick would gave up could be pick 9 or 10 instead of 11 or 12.

You gave up a 1st because you are trying to corner the early market.  I don't think it's necessary to do that because of all the picks you already have.   At this point you are just overpaying  so you can say you have the top 5 picks but I don't think there is really any difference in the grand scheme having 4 of the top 5 vs the top 5.  

It's an overpay by quite a bit.

 
Gally said:
Your making assumptions on the exact puck numbers.  Educated assumptions sure but the pick you got may end up pick 5 or 6 instead of pick 2 or 3.  The pick would gave up could be pick 9 or 10 instead of 11 or 12.
Click to expand...
the pick I traded has been in the LCG 3 straight years. His team is super stacked.  It will be 10-12. It’s a very safe assumption. 

Gally said:
You gave up a 1st because you are trying to corner the early market.  I don't think it's necessary to do that because of all the picks you already have.   At this point you are just overpaying  so you can say you have the top 5 picks but I don't think there is really any difference in the grand scheme having 4 of the top 5 vs the top 5.  
Click to expand...
i felt differently. In a SF league where I have only Z.Wilson, I felt I needed to land 2 QBs early. The only way to do that was to have 1-2. And I also need RB & WR.

This wasn’t some ego or glamor driven move for bragging rights. There’s practical reasoning behind my decision. 

Gally said:
It's an overpay by quite a bit.
Click to expand...
Only the way you originally framed it as moving up 5 spots when in fact I’ll move up 8-10 spots. It’s a huge move up into a critical spot.

It’s considered fair to a slight overpay according to 3 calcs I plugged it into using the variables of “2-3-4” and “9-10-11-12”. And even if it is the extreme end of 9 down to 4” & a small overpay, it gives me peace of mind to know I’ll be able to reload my team. 

At the end of the day I’m happy with it. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This happened today in my 10 Team 1QB PPR League:

Team A gives - AJBrown and Kareem Hunt

Team B gives - Mike Evans and 2023 1st and 2nd rounders

Team B finished in 7th place last year, and if he at least makes the playoffs this year, I like his side, I thought it was a pretty even trade.  Team B usually gets the short end of most of his trades.

 
Hot Sauce Guy said:
the pick I traded has been in the LCG 3 straight years. His team is super stacked.  It will be 10-12. It’s a very safe assumption. 

i felt differently. In a SF league where I have only Z.Wilson, I felt I needed to land 2 QBs early. The only way to do that was to have 1-2. And I also need RB & WR.

This wasn’t some ego or glamor driven move for bragging rights. There’s practical reasoning behind my decision. 

Only the way you originally framed it as moving up 5 spots when in fact I’ll move up 8-10 spots. It’s a huge move up into a critical spot.

It’s considered fair to a slight overpay according to 3 calcs I plugged it into using the variables of “2-3-4” and “9-10-11-12”. And even if it is the extreme end of 9 down to 4” & a small overpay, it gives me peace of mind to know I’ll be able to reload my team. 

At the end of the day I’m happy with it. 
Click to expand...
It's not a fact that you move up that much.  It's an educated assumption.  You don't know the future.

You can be happy with the deal and still made on overpay.  They are not mutually exclusive.  

 
Gally said:
It's not a fact that you move up that much.  It's an educated assumption.  You don't know the future.
Click to expand...
true. But it’s also the most likely outcome here. 

Gally said:
You can be happy with the deal and still made on overpay.  They are not mutually exclusive.  
Click to expand...
I don’t disagree, but I don’t think it was the massive overpay you do.

I paid what i could live with paying to potentially lock up what I felt I needed to rebuild my team.  In SF QB is king. I need starting players to fill my lineup. The pick I just acquired was the last threat to prevent me from getting the top 2 QB in the ‘23 draft, and as a bonus might also allow me to get the top 2 RB & top WR.

that all has value to me.

Of course, any of those players could bust - that’s a risk to consider at a later date. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kevrunner said:
This happened today in my 10 Team 1QB PPR League:

Team A gives - AJBrown and Kareem Hunt

Team B gives - Mike Evans and 2023 1st and 2nd rounders

Team B finished in 7th place last year, and if he at least makes the playoffs this year, I like his side, I thought it was a pretty even trade.  Team B usually gets the short end of most of his trades.
Click to expand...
Seems fair. I like the ‘23 1st , but AJB should have more time left than Evans. It’s hard to choose which side I’d want. so it’s probably fair. 

 
DexterDew said:
12 team ppr start Q/2RB/3WR/TE/Flex

Combo rookie/devy draft with max of 12 devy rostered

Gave: Carter/Toney/3.05/4.05

Got: 1.03

Reason: not sold on either of the players, gives me the 1.03 and 1.05 with good options (Burks, Wilson, London, Williams, Walker... or devy's like Henderson and JSN)
Click to expand...


Carter has been capped, Toney is volatile and I'm going to get a shiny new toy

 
jadensdad said:
1.05 

btw 10$ out of what?
Click to expand...
It's complicated.  We get $50 a year but it rolls over and it is used for RFA/FA and trading.  This is a contract league so when you draft a rookie they start on your DTS when you activate them you have to place a contract on the player.  The entire team has a 50 year limit and cutting guys cost you years for that year.  When you sign a FA during the year you have to give them a contract.

So every April we do RFA.  All players with a contract of 0 get bid on and then when bidding ends either they get matched or they go to the high bidder.  All RFA's will get a new contract on Labor Day as well.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
mzkp54 said:
Gave 1.10 for Hollywood

12 team SF PPR IDP
Click to expand...


I would do that...if Brown is gonna get to the next level, he appears to be in the spot to do it...the 1.10 in this year's draft is worth the risk here because even if he doesn't blow up he will still only be 25 in June and be a contributor.

 
Just went down in one of my leagues transitioning to super flex next year (I'm neither party)

Justin Jefferson 2.08 3.11

For

Zach Wilson, 1.02, 2.02, 3.02

 
InDitkaWeTrust said:
Just went down in one of my leagues transitioning to super flex next year (I'm neither party)

Justin Jefferson 2.08 3.11

For

Zach Wilson, 1.02, 2.02, 3.02
Click to expand...
I love JJ, but I’d take the Wilson/1.02 side here.

SF makes it an easy call for me. 

Of course i’d have to be deep at WR. And then I’m praying hard that Wilson is legit. 

 
InDitkaWeTrust said:
Just went down in one of my leagues transitioning to super flex next year (I'm neither party)

Justin Jefferson 2.08 3.11

For

Zach Wilson, 1.02, 2.02, 3.02
Click to expand...
Even going to SF I would rather have Jefferson over the 1.02 and the drop from 2.02 to 2.08 isn't significant.

 
The current dynasty trade thread says 2021 in the title, so starting a new/current one. 
 

and…GO!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dr. Octopus said:
Wilson is now in prime position to show if he’ll have value. I’m not going to guarantee that he will, but don’t be surprised when he does. People forget he can run as well.
Click to expand...
Oh I agree. I roster him in SF. In JU’s breakdown it seemed like ZWilson was ignored on one side. 

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

eighsse2
Tracing Your Dynasty Team's Cost Basis
Replies
24
Views
3K
Gally
G
EBF
Top 26 Rookies 2021
2 3
Replies
108
Views
16K
jdoggydogg
jdoggydogg
TZMarkie
2018 RE-DRAFT TRADES THREAD
2
Replies
61
Views
4K
Hot Sauce Guy
Hot Sauce Guy

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)
Back
Top