The Gator
Footballguy
I mean I know I am, but when Cook becomes worthless later this season it’ll be like trading a 1 for Pierce.YeahI overpaid for D Pierce.
Or just let me tell myself that.
I mean I know I am, but when Cook becomes worthless later this season it’ll be like trading a 1 for Pierce.YeahI overpaid for D Pierce.
I think the point is that you sold Dalvin Cook as if he wasn't part of the deal anyways so you weren't getting out on him...you just included him in the deal. A first for Pierce is fair.I mean I know I am, but when Cook becomes worthless later this season it’ll be like trading a 1 for Pierce.YeahI overpaid for D Pierce.
Or just let me tell myself that.
I like Pierce but I do think you basically gave away Cook.I mean I know I am, but when Cook becomes worthless later this season it’ll be like trading a 1 for Pierce.YeahI overpaid for D Pierce.
Or just let me tell myself that.
His value will go down each season but why do you think “worthless”. I think you putting that in your head almost made you value him as such in that deal. A late 1st for Pierce is maybe a bit light but it shouldn’t take Cook to close that gap.Cook becomes worthless
That was hyperbole on my part, this is probably a better representation of what I feel-His value will go down each season but why do you think “worthless”. I think you putting that in your head almost valued him as such in that deal. A late 1st for Pierce is maybe a bit light but it shouldn’t take Cook to close that gap.Cook becomes worthless
IMO you are overvaluing Pierce and undervaluing Cook. Pierce has shown flashes this season, but has cooled off lately. Is that due to the horrid Texans' offense? Has he hit a rookie wall? Is he just a very good, but not great RB?I mean I know I am, but when Cook becomes worthless later this season it’ll be like trading a 1 for Pierce.YeahI overpaid for D Pierce.
Or just let me tell myself that.
You aren’t getting Pierce for a single late first in many leagues. I am seeing him ranked as high as RB10 going forward on some sites and a projected late 2nd / early 3rd ADP in startups. That’s worth considerably more than a single late 1st. The gap may not be Cook but it is still pretty sizable. (It’s not like Cook has lit it up 3 out of the last 4 games either.)I think the point is that you sold Dalvin Cook as if he wasn't part of the deal anyways so you weren't getting out on him...you just included him in the deal. A first for Pierce is fair.I mean I know I am, but when Cook becomes worthless later this season it’ll be like trading a 1 for Pierce.YeahI overpaid for D Pierce.
Or just let me tell myself that.
There’s surely a chance that this happens even if not necessarily likely.Maybe some discount him in case he gets Michael Carter’ed, but the Texans would be fools to spend a high pick on a RB given the state of their roster
I think you miss the point of my post if you are replying to me that a late first isn't enough.You aren’t getting Pierce for a single late first in many leagues. I am seeing him ranked as high as RB10 going forward on some sites and a projected late 2nd / early 3rd ADP in startups. That’s worth considerably more than a single late 1st. The gap may not be Cook but it is still pretty sizable. (It’s not like Cook has lit it up 3 out of the last 4 games either.)I think the point is that you sold Dalvin Cook as if he wasn't part of the deal anyways so you weren't getting out on him...you just included him in the deal. A first for Pierce is fair.I mean I know I am, but when Cook becomes worthless later this season it’ll be like trading a 1 for Pierce.YeahI overpaid for D Pierce.
Or just let me tell myself that.
Maybe some discount him in case he gets Michael Carter’ed, but the Texans would be fools to spend a high pick on a RB given the state of their roster. I mean they are fools, but their GM at least does seem to take a more conservative approach to roster building. Seems people are letting a few bad games while the Texans are obviously in pack it in and tank mode color their opinions (they are starting Kyle Allen for pity’s sake.)
Would be very Texans for them to spend Cleveland’s 1st on Bijan.There’s surely a chance that this happens even if not necessarily likely.Maybe some discount him in case he gets Michael Carter’ed, but the Texans would be fools to spend a high pick on a RB given the state of their roster
I’ve seen it so many time and every time beforehand all of the players’ owners thought the same thing “Team X has bigger needs than RB so Player A should be safe.”
The Texans have a lot of picks - using one on a RB isn’t really that far fetched and since Pierce himself was only a fourth round pick, it’s not even like it would need to be a first or second round pick that could cut into his workload. There’s a bunch of good backs in the class.
12 tm sf ppr
had a 3-8 team that didnt compete like i thought it might.
sent CMC, claypool
got swift, javonte, kj osborn
3 or 4 real contenders and 3 or 4 tankers already so there were no 23 picks available to trade for. only had one contender interested in cmc so i took the deal
My SuperFlex league ….
Got Skyy Moore for my ‘23rd 2nd ( will be early )
Selected at 1.08 last year. 12 targets across last 2 games. Injuries yes, but Toney already looking NY fragile, in my head it’s a measured bet that Moore will continue to grow now and is on a top 3 offence
I'm bad with Superflex as I've never played ..... But I think I like it for team A. I think.I’ve got this one sitting there, it’s a smash accept right ??? SuperFlex. Team A’s Got Geno Smith/Lance/Dalton/Brissett at QB
Team A gets Jalen Hurts
Team B gets Trey Lance/Javonte Williams/‘23 1st which will be around 1.04 - 1.06
Team A will still have a ‘23 1st which will be 1st or 2nd pick
I'm taking team B. That's a great haul for Hurts. Lance has more risk but similar upside to hurts, and it's not like Hurts has no risk. And I'm generally a Hurts fan.I’ve got this one sitting there, it’s a smash accept right ??? SuperFlex. Team A’s Got Geno Smith/Lance/Dalton/Brissett at QB
Team A gets Jalen Hurts
Team B gets Trey Lance/Javonte Williams/‘23 1st which will be around 1.04 - 1.06
Team A will still have a ‘23 1st which will be 1st or 2nd pick
I'm taking team B. That's a great haul for Hurts. Lance has more risk but similar upside to hurts, and it's not like Hurts has no risk. And I'm generally a Hurts fan.I’ve got this one sitting there, it’s a smash accept right ??? SuperFlex. Team A’s Got Geno Smith/Lance/Dalton/Brissett at QB
Team A gets Jalen Hurts
Team B gets Trey Lance/Javonte Williams/‘23 1st which will be around 1.04 - 1.06
Team A will still have a ‘23 1st which will be 1st or 2nd pick
Hurts for me by a bunch. I could see it more evenly for a rebuild shedding points.I’ve got this one sitting there, it’s a smash accept right ??? SuperFlex. Team A’s Got Geno Smith/Lance/Dalton/Brissett at QB
Team A gets Jalen Hurts
Team B gets Trey Lance/Javonte Williams/‘23 1st which will be around 1.04 - 1.06
Team A will still have a ‘23 1st which will be 1st or 2nd pick
I’ve got this one sitting there, it’s a smash accept right ??? SuperFlex. Team A’s Got Geno Smith/Lance/Dalton/Brissett at QB
Team A gets Jalen Hurts
Team B gets Trey Lance/Javonte Williams/‘23 1st which will be around 1.04 - 1.06
Team A will still have a ‘23 1st which will be 1st or 2nd pick
I'm taking team B. That's a great haul for Hurts. Lance has more risk but similar upside to hurts, and it's not like Hurts has no risk. And I'm generally a Hurts fan.I’ve got this one sitting there, it’s a smash accept right ??? SuperFlex. Team A’s Got Geno Smith/Lance/Dalton/Brissett at QB
Team A gets Jalen Hurts
Team B gets Trey Lance/Javonte Williams/‘23 1st which will be around 1.04 - 1.06
Team A will still have a ‘23 1st which will be 1st or 2nd pick
I’m conflicted. First superFlex league and my big mistake on start up was not prioritising QBs and have struggled ever since. There’s a shortage of top QBs in NFL just now and watching some Devy content on YouTube recently there’s a top heavy and very very limited stock of top QB talents in the pipeline for 23/24/25
Both Javonte and Lance have injury and team questions. Both could flame. Both could hit but Hurts looks like a sure fire top 5QB going forward for the next few years
My RotoUnderworld trade calculator has this as a HUGE win for the Hurts side
With Hurts in place instead of Lance, alongside Geno, it would allow me to feel less compelled to just go QB with the ‘23 1.01/2, and replace Javonte with Bijan Robinson if it fell that way
I like it.I overpaid for D Pierce.
Wanted to move D Cook since I feel like the window to do so is slamming.
Cook and a late 1(#1 seeds pick ) for Pierce
How is your roster at other positions? To me this is a smash accept as you said. You are trading for somebody that is a stud and giving up 3 "might be"s .I'm taking team B. That's a great haul for Hurts. Lance has more risk but similar upside to hurts, and it's not like Hurts has no risk. And I'm generally a Hurts fan.I’ve got this one sitting there, it’s a smash accept right ??? SuperFlex. Team A’s Got Geno Smith/Lance/Dalton/Brissett at QB
Team A gets Jalen Hurts
Team B gets Trey Lance/Javonte Williams/‘23 1st which will be around 1.04 - 1.06
Team A will still have a ‘23 1st which will be 1st or 2nd pick
I’m conflicted. First superFlex league and my big mistake on start up was not prioritising QBs and have struggled ever since. There’s a shortage of top QBs in NFL just now and watching some Devy content on YouTube recently there’s a top heavy and very very limited stock of top QB talents in the pipeline for 23/24/25
Both Javonte and Lance have injury and team questions. Both could flame. Both could hit but Hurts looks like a sure fire top 5QB going forward for the next few years
My RotoUnderworld trade calculator has this as a HUGE win for the Hurts side
With Hurts in place instead of Lance, alongside Geno, it would allow me to feel less compelled to just go QB with the ‘23 1.01/2, and replace Javonte with Bijan Robinson if it fell that way
How is your roster at other positions? To me this is a smash accept as you said. You are trading for somebody that is a stud and giving up 3 "might be"s .I'm taking team B. That's a great haul for Hurts. Lance has more risk but similar upside to hurts, and it's not like Hurts has no risk. And I'm generally a Hurts fan.I’ve got this one sitting there, it’s a smash accept right ??? SuperFlex. Team A’s Got Geno Smith/Lance/Dalton/Brissett at QB
Team A gets Jalen Hurts
Team B gets Trey Lance/Javonte Williams/‘23 1st which will be around 1.04 - 1.06
Team A will still have a ‘23 1st which will be 1st or 2nd pick
I’m conflicted. First superFlex league and my big mistake on start up was not prioritising QBs and have struggled ever since. There’s a shortage of top QBs in NFL just now and watching some Devy content on YouTube recently there’s a top heavy and very very limited stock of top QB talents in the pipeline for 23/24/25
Both Javonte and Lance have injury and team questions. Both could flame. Both could hit but Hurts looks like a sure fire top 5QB going forward for the next few years
My RotoUnderworld trade calculator has this as a HUGE win for the Hurts side
With Hurts in place instead of Lance, alongside Geno, it would allow me to feel less compelled to just go QB with the ‘23 1.01/2, and replace Javonte with Bijan Robinson if it fell that way
I wouldn't dismiss the idea of going QB at 1.01 or 1.02 because Geno isn't a long term answer at QB in a SF league.
How is your roster at other positions? To me this is a smash accept as you said. You are trading for somebody that is a stud and giving up 3 "might be"s .I'm taking team B. That's a great haul for Hurts. Lance has more risk but similar upside to hurts, and it's not like Hurts has no risk. And I'm generally a Hurts fan.I’ve got this one sitting there, it’s a smash accept right ??? SuperFlex. Team A’s Got Geno Smith/Lance/Dalton/Brissett at QB
Team A gets Jalen Hurts
Team B gets Trey Lance/Javonte Williams/‘23 1st which will be around 1.04 - 1.06
Team A will still have a ‘23 1st which will be 1st or 2nd pick
I’m conflicted. First superFlex league and my big mistake on start up was not prioritising QBs and have struggled ever since. There’s a shortage of top QBs in NFL just now and watching some Devy content on YouTube recently there’s a top heavy and very very limited stock of top QB talents in the pipeline for 23/24/25
Both Javonte and Lance have injury and team questions. Both could flame. Both could hit but Hurts looks like a sure fire top 5QB going forward for the next few years
My RotoUnderworld trade calculator has this as a HUGE win for the Hurts side
With Hurts in place instead of Lance, alongside Geno, it would allow me to feel less compelled to just go QB with the ‘23 1.01/2, and replace Javonte with Bijan Robinson if it fell that way
I wouldn't dismiss the idea of going QB at 1.01 or 1.02 because Geno isn't a long term answer at QB in a SF league.
I think that's a good trade for you. Chiefs won't stand pat but at this point I think they only have 4 WR's under contract next season. MVS, Moore, Toney and Justin Watson and easy to see them jettisoning MVS whose contract was always designed for an early out option.My SuperFlex league ….
Got Skyy Moore for my ‘23rd 2nd ( will be early )
Selected at 1.08 last year. 12 targets across last 2 games. Injuries yes, but Toney already looking NY fragile, in my head it’s a measured bet that Moore will continue to grow now and is on a top 3 offence
Oh my goodness. That’s almost a 1st too much.12 team PPR. 1 QB league.
Gave: Pacheco
Received: 2023 1st (likely 1.12), Kmet
Disclaimer: my league rules gold-plate RB's and miniaturize TE's. But I like getting Pacheco there.Oh my goodness. That’s almost a 1st too much.12 team PPR. 1 QB league.
Gave: Pacheco
Received: 2023 1st (likely 1.12), Kmet
12 team PPR. 1 QB league.
Gave: Pacheco
Received: 2023 1st (likely 1.12), Kmet
Good deal for you. The Chiefs are just as likely to have a new flavor ice cream next year.12 team PPR. 1 QB league.
Gave: Pacheco
Received: 2023 1st (likely 1.12), Kmet
Before I accepted I looked at some early rankings and saw corum and Mayer around that 1.12. It’s very early but I would be happy with Mayer there. Not sure right now what I think of corum.12 team PPR. 1 QB league.
Gave: Pacheco
Received: 2023 1st (likely 1.12), Kmet
That one’s going to have answers all over the place, but you’ve presumably turned a 4th/5th/FA pickup into a 1st and Kmet in a rookie draft thats main strength is depth at the RB position. Pacheco’s ceiling is tantalising but with a low certainty of it being reached.
Beyond Bijan and Gibbs, I’m liking the batch of RBs that follow - Miller/Evans/Tucker/Corum, with a good landing spot for any of them they could all be very solid.
At 1.12 it’s a distinct possibility 1 or 2 of them are there.
I'll echo those who really like this deal for you as it's hard to see Pachecho surviving the combo of deep draft class and possible epic FA class and not come out with his value damaged. Especially for a front office which is aggressive, just seems hard to see a scenario Pacheco is not on a team with better RB's then CEH, ROJO and old McKinnon next year and it's not like he's been a smash start with that as his comp.12 team PPR. 1 QB league.
Gave: Pacheco
Received: 2023 1st (likely 1.12), Kmet
I sold Aaron Jones for a [likely] mid 1st a few weeks ago. This seems similar and I like it.Just went down in a 1pt PPR
D. Cook, Mattison, Butker
23 mid 1st, Doubs
This is a good sell on D. Cook. He has produced well this year, but not at an elite level. He still is top 12 overall RB in my PPR, but 14 overall for points per game. This is the start of his decline.Just went down in a 1pt PPR
D. Cook, Mattison, Butker
23 mid 1st, Doubs
That's horrible. I'd rather have Mixon alone than Olave alone.12 team ppr
Mixon/23 late 1st for Olave/23 late 2
I’d rather have the Olave side of the deal.That's horrible. I'd rather have Mixon alone than Olave alone.12 team ppr
Mixon/23 late 1st for Olave/23 late 2
Disclaimer: Our league starts 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 FX, so RB's are far more important than WR's. Granted, I would love to have Olave, but a good not-quite-old RB is a primo asset in this league.I’d rather have the Olave side of the deal.That's horrible. I'd rather have Mixon alone than Olave alone.12 team ppr
Mixon/23 late 1st for Olave/23 late 2
My league starts the same and I understand your point about RB importance, I was just never a Mixon believer. And seeing what Perine has done the last 3 weeks I just wonder how valuable Mixon really is.Disclaimer: Our league starts 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 FX, so RB's are far more important than WR's. Granted, I would love to have Olave, but a good not-quite-old RB is a primo asset in this league.I’d rather have the Olave side of the deal.That's horrible. I'd rather have Mixon alone than Olave alone.12 team ppr
Mixon/23 late 1st for Olave/23 late 2
Fair point. I hate how frequently he plods into the line for 0.5 yards. But yeah, the Perine thing, I might have thought the same, except that Perine has already looked great, to my recollection, whenever the Bengals have needed or chosen to look his way the last 2 years. And it hasn't affected usage before, so why now? Though, it has been an exceptionally good couple of weeks for him, so who knows.My league starts the same and I understand your point about RB importance, I was just never a Mixon believer. And seeing what Perine has done the last 3 weeks I just wonder how valuable Mixon really is.Disclaimer: Our league starts 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 FX, so RB's are far more important than WR's. Granted, I would love to have Olave, but a good not-quite-old RB is a primo asset in this league.I’d rather have the Olave side of the deal.That's horrible. I'd rather have Mixon alone than Olave alone.12 team ppr
Mixon/23 late 1st for Olave/23 late 2
A little more context. First, its start 3 WR PPR. This was my trade. I got Olave.Fair point. I hate how frequently he plods into the line for 0.5 yards. But yeah, the Perine thing, I might have thought the same, except that Perine has already looked great, to my recollection, whenever the Bengals have needed or chosen to look his way the last 2 years. And it hasn't affected usage before, so why now? Though, it has been an exceptionally good couple of weeks for him, so who knows.My league starts the same and I understand your point about RB importance, I was just never a Mixon believer. And seeing what Perine has done the last 3 weeks I just wonder how valuable Mixon really is.Disclaimer: Our league starts 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 FX, so RB's are far more important than WR's. Granted, I would love to have Olave, but a good not-quite-old RB is a primo asset in this league.I’d rather have the Olave side of the deal.That's horrible. I'd rather have Mixon alone than Olave alone.12 team ppr
Mixon/23 late 1st for Olave/23 late 2