Boston
Footballguy
Definitely 1.5...the Kamara cash-out should have been last year or even the year before for max value...he is fortunate to get something as legit as the 1.5...take it and don't look back.
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
****OFFICIAL DYNASTY TRADES**** (48 Viewers)
- Thread starter Gottabesweet
- Start date
Definitely 1.5...the Kamara cash-out should have been last year or even the year before for max value...he is fortunate to get something as legit as the 1.5...take it and don't look back.
Dr. Octopus
Footballguy
Yeah I couldn’t get anywhere close to this trying to move him all last offseason - this off-season his value should be even lower.
Blick
Footballguy
Agreed. I'm not sure if I'd give up a mid 2nd for him at this point.
Jonesin For Some Football
Footballguy
I personally take J-Will but I could see taking the other side. TP had a great season and he could be the 1A somewhere (even Dallas) next year and a 24 1st is valuable. Plus, J-Will tore up his knee that wasn't just an ACL I believe. Seems fair due to Team B taking all of the risk.
Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
Gimme 1.05
Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
Interesting deal. I'd probably have leaned Pollard/1st if Pollard was healthy.
With both guys injured, I'll lean JaWill - Payton could make him a superstar, assuming a full return to health.
Very fair deal though.
Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
Yeah, he's been not a fun player to roster.
Also, on a related note, "massive package" is the name of my alt jazz fusion band.
I got one Javonte team. I would pass on Pollard and a 2024 mid to late 1 for him.
I got two Pollard teams.
One the late one seems stone cold lock type. I think I'd do it, I'd give up Pollard and my 2024#1 for Javonte.
My other Pollard team is borderline on the pick, one of those picks that could be close to anywhere, I'd pass in that league on giving up Pollard and my 2024#1.
So my first instinct was to say I lean the Javonte side but looking at from my teams angles it seems about as fair as it gets.
2.10 is on the wrong side but even if I had to pay it on top of Kamara for the 1.5 I would not hesitate to do it.
Same, seems the best bet for Kamara owners is maybe hope any suspension is light or doesn’t come and try to move him in August to a contender. Someone giving the 1.05 for him right now is nonsensical.
jm192
Footballguy
This for sure.
jm192
Footballguy
I'd rather have the 2.01.
Knox is "ok." He's definitely not a sit it and forget it starter.
I think the 2.01 is going to land a solid young player.
I think one could get more than Knox out of it.
This is the kind of deal you can always pull off later. Once we've got the information, if you hate who you think the 13th best player is--I can't imagine a Knox owner scoffing at 2.01 for him.
wlwiles
Footballguy
Agree 100%, my thought seeing it at the time was "I'd make that deal for maybe Shultz or Njoku but Knox is a tier lower". I think the guy who got the 2.01 is looking to make another move up for a on higher first. He has his own 1.09 and 2.09, and since this deal went through he's now thrown the 2.01 and 1.09 on the trading block, maybe trying to move up to 1.06 area...???
Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
That should get it done for 1.06, maybe even 1.05
Boston
Footballguy
Yuck...why...there's just no reason for this...Knox is a solid real TE, but he has never had more than 50 receptions or 600 yards in 4 years...fantasy-wise he is nothing special...2.1 is a quality pick in any draft but this draft is setting-up so that there should be a very good player there...if he wanted a TE that bad, he would have been better off rolling the dice on Mayer or possibly Kincaid at 2.1 and hope they are the real deal...I despise this trade.
Last edited:
BeTheMatch
Footballguy
Where are we at with Purdy now in SF? I've got Lawrence at 1 QB but Mac Jones as second QB. And then I have Lance. So would a mid second be too much to lock up the handcuff? Offer is on the table to me.
smbkrypt24
Footballguy
Super flex. Deep leagues.
Gave: 1.11, 3.11
Received: 2025 1st, 2025 2nd
Gave: 1.10, 2.10
Received: 2025 1st, 2025 2nd
Gave: 1.11, 3.11
Received: 2025 1st, 2025 2nd
Gave: 1.10, 2.10
Received: 2025 1st, 2025 2nd
Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
Mid 2nd seems about right.
I wouldn’t pay if it I didn’t have Lance. As a Lance shareholder who has Purdy, I’d probably pay that if I didn’t have him.
The situation is kind of a cluster, but it seems like a worthy gamble.
ghostguy123
Footballguy
smbkrypt24
Footballguy
Hard for me to know what you’re laughing at.
Boston
Footballguy
Can not comment on this one until we know what you are thinking here...
smbkrypt24
Footballguy
They are two of the 3/4 worst teams in the league based on starters/players.
I have 1.01-1.05 in 2023 and trying to continue my slow rebuild with eye on future assets.
Blick
Footballguy
Give me two years of production.
This is good reasoning IMO to do this 2024#1's but not wait two years.
smbkrypt24
Footballguy
I should probably say. I have the second trade teams 2023, 2024, 2025 1st and they will most likely be 1.01 each year.
ghostguy123
Footballguy
2025.
I just like those kinds of crazy deals
ghostguy123
Footballguy
Easy move on your part. Nice work
FFPC Triflex Superflex
Gave: Joe Burrow, Sam Howell, Terry McLaurin, Mike Gesicki, 2024 R2
Got: Josh Allen, Greg Dulcich, Curtis Samuel
My team is defending champ but is going to have some tough roster cuts to make, so even if it was an overpay for Allen, it allows me to keep some guys I'd otherwise have to cut. (Not sure I'll even keep Samuel.) Obviously if Howell is truly the Week 1 starter and Gesicki goes to a team that actually throws to him, this might turn out to be pretty lopsided.
Gave: Joe Burrow, Sam Howell, Terry McLaurin, Mike Gesicki, 2024 R2
Got: Josh Allen, Greg Dulcich, Curtis Samuel
My team is defending champ but is going to have some tough roster cuts to make, so even if it was an overpay for Allen, it allows me to keep some guys I'd otherwise have to cut. (Not sure I'll even keep Samuel.) Obviously if Howell is truly the Week 1 starter and Gesicki goes to a team that actually throws to him, this might turn out to be pretty lopsided.
Boston
Footballguy
What does Triflex mean?
Been slow in my leagues and there are the only two trades I've seen and neither involve me, both from same league and both the same teams(teams A and B are same in both trades)
FFPC standard, not SF.
Team A gave: Dameon Pierce
Team B gave: 2024#1 (new owner of worst roster in the league but since FFPC has draft playoffs the pick is most likely going to be 3 or 4)
And this puzzler:
Team A gave: 2.5, 3.1 and 4.1
Team B gave: 1.10
My conclusion: assuming they are not in cahoots smart move by team A to move on a new owner which IMO can often yield some great deals as the new owner of a team is not married to anyone. As for team B, I like Pierce but he's not getting anyone over the hump so bad team stays bad and will probably be orphaned again next year without their #1 pick or anything overly appealing about it to attract much of a purchase price. The kind of team I'd not be interested for free if I had to pay the deposit.
FFPC standard, not SF.
Team A gave: Dameon Pierce
Team B gave: 2024#1 (new owner of worst roster in the league but since FFPC has draft playoffs the pick is most likely going to be 3 or 4)
And this puzzler:
Team A gave: 2.5, 3.1 and 4.1
Team B gave: 1.10
My conclusion: assuming they are not in cahoots smart move by team A to move on a new owner which IMO can often yield some great deals as the new owner of a team is not married to anyone. As for team B, I like Pierce but he's not getting anyone over the hump so bad team stays bad and will probably be orphaned again next year without their #1 pick or anything overly appealing about it to attract much of a purchase price. The kind of team I'd not be interested for free if I had to pay the deposit.
Standard FFPC league are dual flex allowing only for RB, WR or TE as flex options. I don't play these leagues myself so someone correct me if I'm wrong but I believe FFPC SF leagues are dual flex with one flex allowed to be a QB. Triflex means 3 flex spots with one allowed to be used as the QB.
Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
I like the move. Debatable whether Allen is an upgrade from Burrow (or if he is, by a significant enough amount to justify making the move) but given your roster limitations I don’t mind this move. Allen’s rushing yards keep his weekly floor high, and Inhave faith that they’ll add a WR, and likely a better receiving RB in the draft, so he could take another step in 2023.
Typical FFPC dynasty leagues (both 1QB and superflex) require kicker and defense, and have a max of two flex spots. So an ideal superflex team would start a second QB in one flex, and the other flex would be for RB/WR/TE. Because these leagues require teams to start two RBs and two WRs, a big complaint is that RBs are too overvalued. (I have found this to be the case, especially in 1QB leagues.)
The Triflex format is superflex but eliminates the kicker and defense and replaces those positions with an additional starting WR and additional flex. So teams are required to start two RBs and three WRs, and an ideal team would start a second QB in the superflex spot but still have two more flex spots to fill with non-QBs. The format elevates the value of WRs (because teams could start two QBs and five WRs) and puts them on par with RBs. It's my favorite FFPC format because it opens up so many other trade scenarios.
Dez
Footballguy
FFPC normal dynasty league. Today someone traded Mixon to the defending champ for a projected late 2nd/3rd. If Mixon stays on Cincy and does not get a long suspension that is a gift. Not much risk for a team defending champ to make this trade as it is very unlikely that 2nd would be high next year.
smbkrypt24
Footballguy
I wouldn’t pay 1.08 for him. He is avoid unless I am a contender in season. I would pay late 2nd and 3rd tho
Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
I would absolutely sell Mixon for 1.08
I would absolutely not buy Mixon for 1.08
That 2nd+3rd is a bargain.
Blick
Footballguy
For a data point, I sold Mixon/1.12 for Olave not long ago. I’m happy with my decision.
Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
Yeah, just a heavy workload for a dude who’s looking more and more average / replaceable, and who’s been dinged up over the years. Feels like a good time to sell, and a questionable time to buy.
Boston
Footballguy
Too funny...that is exactly how one of my two leagues does it...just never knew that was the name...by the way, getting rid of kickers and defense was such a positive move.
ghostguy123
Footballguy
Every league should do this
Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
We voted for this in my main dynasty and I love it.
eighsse2
Footballguy
I hear a lot of people say this. If it were proposed in our league, I would vote against the change. Clue me in: what's so great about not having K and DST? Just less to worry about and no one cared much about them anyway?
ghostguy123
Footballguy
At least get rid of kicker. Hate even thinking about kicker for my team
Boston
Footballguy
Makes for a far better "quality of life" in fantasy...
I run three local/friendly dynasty leagues on MFL. In the past few years we've had five votes (a couple leagues had votes in back-to-back years) to remove kickers. All five votes failed. I can't stand kickers, but we couldn't convince people to get rid of them. And the pro-kicker argument was like "I just like having them" or other nonsense.
Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
1000%
My 16-team league (took over an orphan) not only has a mandatory K spot, but you have to put in a K or you lose points for the week.
So you have teams adding backup K’s and punters. It’s so dumb.
/rant
ghostguy123
Footballguy
I have a theory
People in 2-3 leagues prefer to have kickers.
People in 30 leagues hate kickers.
I am in 4 leagues but I hate kickers.
People in 2-3 leagues prefer to have kickers.
People in 30 leagues hate kickers.
I am in 4 leagues but I hate kickers.
