What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

****OFFICIAL DYNASTY TRADES**** (30 Viewers)

It's a 1 QB league.

I get that. Hurts is valuable. Given the way those trades went down, the Hurts side won both trades.

eta* I could see an argument for Team A, but it would have to be an earlier first.

eta2* I ran it through Keeptradecut. It's the Hurts side both times, though not as much with the Team A trade.
 
What an odd series of trades.

Essentially traded the 1.04 and a 24 1st for 1.06, 1.10 and some change.

Possibly could have got something close to the 1.10 for a 24 1st straight up and not moved back 2 spots to do so?

I'd be feeling pretty good if I was team A to be honest, assuming they still have a competent QB.
TeamA gave up Hurts. They still have Mahomes.
 
Just traded 1.6 this year and Zach Ertz for a 2024 1st which I am convinced will be a top 2/3 pick
If someone is paying that for a 33 year old TE coming off a late season multi-ligament knee tear you don't need to do lot convincing to me the pick will be high. I have Ertz in two FFPC TE premium leagues and at this point my plan is to cut him if I can't get anything for him and we have to trim rosters.
Agree Ertz isn't worth much, but I don't see this as giving up a 24 1st for Ertz. I see it as giving up the 1.6 this year for a random pick next year in a 16 team league. Don't know if it is sf, te premium, rebuilding or contending, but 1.6 is a pretty good pick. You are losing out on the use of what could be a pretty good player AND your praying for a top 3 pick next year in order to make it pay off. I'm not in any 16 tm lgs, but this far out (1 yr+) in 12 tm lgs I usually value a future 1st around 1.8. Not sure I would do it whether rebuilding or contending, maybe if I had a ton of 1st rd picks and wanted to move some, but if that were the case I would be looking to move a later one. Just my 2 cents, if I felt certain it was bottom 3 team maybe, but it is hard to know that this far away from the start of the season.
 
FFPC 1 QB.
Team A gets:
1.04 + 2024 1st

Team B gets:
Jalen Hurts + 1.10 + Cade Otton

TeamA gave up Hurts. They still have Mahomes.

Even without knowing team A has Mahomes I think they won on value anyway. At least based on my 7 FFPC rules leagues. f we can all see the 1.10 as fairly close in value to a 2024 #1 I have never seen anyone in any of those 7 leagues give up pick 4 for a QB.

Hurts was traded near the deadline in one of those leagues. The #1 seed gave up their 2023#1 and Wilson for Hurts. That pick ended up being 10 mainly because the MNF game got cancelled otherwise it would have been 12, which is where it was projected when the trade was made. And I would add Hurts was more valuable at that time, then he is right now.

I saw that trade and got a team with Hurts, Fields and Watson. Offered a team that at the time was right on fringe of being a playoff team, but was in at the time(and ended up finishing second) Hurts for their #1. Refused no counter and their main QB was Goff. Sent another sure playoff team an offer of Hurts, Gage and a third for the Herbert and Ridley. Refused with comment that he preferred Herbert straight up(which long term is easy to see, not when you are trying to compete last year).

I did not offer Hurts to anyone else because I did not think anyone would give me anything for him because no one ever does in my leagues. I've had Mahomes since his rookie year in 3 leagues and best out of the blue offer I have ever got in all these years was 1.10, which is the same best offer I ever got for Herbert who I've had on two teams since his rookie year.


So that's my very long winded way of saying in this format, that's a clear win for the team getting the 4. It may work out for the other team but based on my experience they overpaid.
 
Just traded 1.6 this year and Zach Ertz for a 2024 1st which I am convinced will be a top 2/3 pick
If someone is paying that for a 33 year old TE coming off a late season multi-ligament knee tear you don't need to do lot convincing to me the pick will be high. I have Ertz in two FFPC TE premium leagues and at this point my plan is to cut him if I can't get anything for him and we have to trim rosters.
Agree Ertz isn't worth much, but I don't see this as giving up a 24 1st for Ertz. I see it as giving up the 1.6 this year for a random pick next year in a 16 team league. Don't know if it is sf, te premium, rebuilding or contending, but 1.6 is a pretty good pick. You are losing out on the use of what could be a pretty good player AND your praying for a top 3 pick next year in order to make it pay off. I'm not in any 16 tm lgs, but this far out (1 yr+) in 12 tm lgs I usually value a future 1st around 1.8. Not sure I would do it whether rebuilding or contending, maybe if I had a ton of 1st rd picks and wanted to move some, but if that were the case I would be looking to move a later one. Just my 2 cents, if I felt certain it was bottom 3 team maybe, but it is hard to know that this far away from the start of the season.
My bad and thanks for pointing it out. I'd been on a few day bender and responding to some posts while stuck in the airport yesterday and my reading comprehension might have been low. I 100% missed the 1.6.
 
FFPC 1 QB.
Team A gets:
1.04 + 2024 1st

Team B gets:
Jalen Hurts + 1.10 + Cade Otton

TeamA gave up Hurts. They still have Mahomes.

Even without knowing team A has Mahomes I think they won on value anyway. At least based on my 7 FFPC rules leagues. f we can all see the 1.10 as fairly close in value to a 2024 #1 I have never seen anyone in any of those 7 leagues give up pick 4 for a QB.

Hurts was traded near the deadline in one of those leagues. The #1 seed gave up their 2023#1 and Wilson for Hurts. That pick ended up being 10 mainly because the MNF game got cancelled otherwise it would have been 12, which is where it was projected when the trade was made. And I would add Hurts was more valuable at that time, then he is right now.

I saw that trade and got a team with Hurts, Fields and Watson. Offered a team that at the time was right on fringe of being a playoff team, but was in at the time(and ended up finishing second) Hurts for their #1. Refused no counter and their main QB was Goff. Sent another sure playoff team an offer of Hurts, Gage and a third for the Herbert and Ridley. Refused with comment that he preferred Herbert straight up(which long term is easy to see, not when you are trying to compete last year).

I did not offer Hurts to anyone else because I did not think anyone would give me anything for him because no one ever does in my leagues. I've had Mahomes since his rookie year in 3 leagues and best out of the blue offer I have ever got in all these years was 1.10, which is the same best offer I ever got for Herbert who I've had on two teams since his rookie year.


So that's my very long winded way of saying in this format, that's a clear win for the team getting the 4. It may work out for the other team but based on my experience they overpaid.
The Worst Offered thread has a similar conversation going on about the value of QBs in a 1QB league. It’s easy to say that QBs don’t have the value of a 1st. And I totally understand that argument. It is tough though to have that opinion when you are one of the QB have-nots. Sure that 1st could end up being J Jefferson, but it could also be T Sermon. Having a top 5 QB is nice piece of mind.

I suppose you could cobble your way to a top 8 equivalent QB. But have you ever tried cobbling? It’s tough. Makes you arthritic.
 
I suppose you could cobble your way to a top 8 equivalent QB. But have you ever tried cobbling? It’s tough. Makes you arthritic.
Yes, the league we are in together is the my one league that does not have a stud QB. Pinned my hopes on Lance and it's not worked so far. Life's been rough.

I've said this previously but the 3 teams I have Mahomes I got twice for $1 pickups his rookie year and after his rookie year gave 2.10 for him. The two teams I have Herbert he was around $40-60 FA buy. I once had Hurts on 4 teams, all FA buys-actually dropped the most on him because it was near end of the year so went into the $100+ range. Watson I have on two teams and both he was a FA pickup in the $70's and also picked up Lamar once in FA. This covers my starting QB and/o backups on every dynasty team other then our league except the two I paid mid seconds, the highest draft capital I've ever spent on a QB, on Kyler.

So for me it's extremely hard to pay for a QB when most of my were fairly cheap FA pickups but I do think owners have gotten savvier and it seems more difficult these days. What I mean by owners getting savvier is a few years ago everyone would have cut a guy like Lance just as many people cut Mahomes, Herbert, Lamar,etc,etc when they did not start the season. But beyond me I'm still not seeing people pay for QB's in my one start QB leagues which just gets me back to that trade and based on my leagues no one has ever paid that for a QB that I can recall. Trevor Lawrence might have gone as high at 1.12 in a league, not sure about that, might have been 2.1. If he did not go 1.12 I"d have to go all the way back to RG3/Luck to find a QB who was taken in round one of the rookie drafts. I agree life sucks without a stud QB and it's really hard to win, some of us, me and apparently most of my league mates, are stuck on idea of not paying big time for a QB and can't come off it.
 
Just traded 1.6 this year and Zach Ertz for a 2024 1st which I am convinced will be a top 2/3 pick
If someone is paying that for a 33 year old TE coming off a late season multi-ligament knee tear you don't need to do lot convincing to me the pick will be high. I have Ertz in two FFPC TE premium leagues and at this point my plan is to cut him if I can't get anything for him and we have to trim rosters.
Agree Ertz isn't worth much, but I don't see this as giving up a 24 1st for Ertz. I see it as giving up the 1.6 this year for a random pick next year in a 16 team league. Don't know if it is sf, te premium, rebuilding or contending, but 1.6 is a pretty good pick. You are losing out on the use of what could be a pretty good player AND your praying for a top 3 pick next year in order to make it pay off. I'm not in any 16 tm lgs, but this far out (1 yr+) in 12 tm lgs I usually value a future 1st around 1.8. Not sure I would do it whether rebuilding or contending, maybe if I had a ton of 1st rd picks and wanted to move some, but if that were the case I would be looking to move a later one. Just my 2 cents, if I felt certain it was bottom 3 team maybe, but it is hard to know that this far away from the start of the season.
You are correct sir. I had offered Collins as a throw in and he wanted Ertz. Fine with me since I agree with menobrown that I would have cut Ertz anyway

It's a contract league and I have a really good team and also had the #6 pick from a previous deal and also picks 15 and 16. Didn't really have room for all 3 picks on my roster without trading or cutting someone I value so rolled the dice that that team I traded with will be a bad team again this year. At absolute worst, I can't see the 2024 pick being lower than the 6th I traded away and it very well could be the #1 overall pick. Team is pretty bad. I had made a conscious effort before the start of the 2022 season to trade for the same guys first rounder anticipating a bad season. I was able to do that and it ended up being the #2 overall pick, but I had traded it mid season for Tee Higgins.

TMI I know but just some background. Under diffferent circumstances such as I was a mid level team looking to contend, I probably wouldn't have done the deal
 
I suppose you could cobble your way to a top 8 equivalent QB. But have you ever tried cobbling? It’s tough. Makes you arthritic.
Yes, the league we are in together is the my one league that does not have a stud QB. Pinned my hopes on Lance and it's not worked so far. Life's been rough.

I've said this previously but the 3 teams I have Mahomes I got twice for $1 pickups his rookie year and after his rookie year gave 2.10 for him. The two teams I have Herbert he was around $40-60 FA buy. I once had Hurts on 4 teams, all FA buys-actually dropped the most on him because it was near end of the year so went into the $100+ range. Watson I have on two teams and both he was a FA pickup in the $70's and also picked up Lamar once in FA. This covers my starting QB and/o backups on every dynasty team other then our league except the two I paid mid seconds, the highest draft capital I've ever spent on a QB, on Kyler.

So for me it's extremely hard to pay for a QB when most of my were fairly cheap FA pickups but I do think owners have gotten savvier and it seems more difficult these days. What I mean by owners getting savvier is a few years ago everyone would have cut a guy like Lance just as many people cut Mahomes, Herbert, Lamar,etc,etc when they did not start the season. But beyond me I'm still not seeing people pay for QB's in my one start QB leagues which just gets me back to that trade and based on my leagues no one has ever paid that for a QB that I can recall. Trevor Lawrence might have gone as high at 1.12 in a league, not sure about that, might have been 2.1. If he did not go 1.12 I"d have to go all the way back to RG3/Luck to find a QB who was taken in round one of the rookie drafts. I agree life sucks without a stud QB and it's really hard to win, some of us, me and apparently most of my league mates, are stuck on idea of not paying big time for a QB and can't come off it.
I can see where you AND Jabrony are both coming from, I have always felt as you do with regard to FFPC 1 QB lgs and had the "I'll find 1 or 2 to get it done" attitude. However, I feel the stream qb, and QBs don't matter winds have changed over the last couple of years and having a top qb has become much more important recently. I agree I am still not paying the iron price for qb in 1 qb lgs, but I am paying more and more than ever trying to make sure I get one of the top ones. Not sure everyone has noticed, but as Jabrony pointed out, the whole streaming\cobbling thing has gotten a lot tougher and you have a pretty big advantage with a top qb. I traded a future 1st in the 2021 startup we share to trade up for Mahomes and would do it again in a heart beat. Joey traded for Allen and I don't think its any coincidence we have been 1 and 2 seeds both years. Lots of land mines with the cobble qbs in recent years.
 
Just traded 1.6 this year and Zach Ertz for a 2024 1st which I am convinced will be a top 2/3 pick
If someone is paying that for a 33 year old TE coming off a late season multi-ligament knee tear you don't need to do lot convincing to me the pick will be high. I have Ertz in two FFPC TE premium leagues and at this point my plan is to cut him if I can't get anything for him and we have to trim rosters.
Agree Ertz isn't worth much, but I don't see this as giving up a 24 1st for Ertz. I see it as giving up the 1.6 this year for a random pick next year in a 16 team league. Don't know if it is sf, te premium, rebuilding or contending, but 1.6 is a pretty good pick. You are losing out on the use of what could be a pretty good player AND your praying for a top 3 pick next year in order to make it pay off. I'm not in any 16 tm lgs, but this far out (1 yr+) in 12 tm lgs I usually value a future 1st around 1.8. Not sure I would do it whether rebuilding or contending, maybe if I had a ton of 1st rd picks and wanted to move some, but if that were the case I would be looking to move a later one. Just my 2 cents, if I felt certain it was bottom 3 team maybe, but it is hard to know that this far away from the start of the season.
You are correct sir. I had offered Collins as a throw in and he wanted Ertz. Fine with me since I agree with menobrown that I would have cut Ertz anyway

It's a contract league and I have a really good team and also had the #6 pick from a previous deal and also picks 15 and 16. Didn't really have room for all 3 picks on my roster without trading or cutting someone I value so rolled the dice that that team I traded with will be a bad team again this year. At absolute worst, I can't see the 2024 pick being lower than the 6th I traded away and it very well could be the #1 overall pick. Team is pretty bad. I had made a conscious effort before the start of the 2022 season to trade for the same guys first rounder anticipating a bad season. I was able to do that and it ended up being the #2 overall pick, but I had traded it mid season for Tee Higgins.

TMI I know but just some background. Under diffferent circumstances such as I was a mid level team looking to contend, I probably wouldn't have done the deal
That is good context, you are established winner (good to be the King!) with multiple picks and roster limitations. You have the flexibility and incentive to take a calculated risk and that makes the deal a lot more sensible. GL!
 
Just traded 1.6 this year and Zach Ertz for a 2024 1st which I am convinced will be a top 2/3 pick
If someone is paying that for a 33 year old TE coming off a late season multi-ligament knee tear you don't need to do lot convincing to me the pick will be high. I have Ertz in two FFPC TE premium leagues and at this point my plan is to cut him if I can't get anything for him and we have to trim rosters.
Agree Ertz isn't worth much, but I don't see this as giving up a 24 1st for Ertz. I see it as giving up the 1.6 this year for a random pick next year in a 16 team league. Don't know if it is sf, te premium, rebuilding or contending, but 1.6 is a pretty good pick. You are losing out on the use of what could be a pretty good player AND your praying for a top 3 pick next year in order to make it pay off. I'm not in any 16 tm lgs, but this far out (1 yr+) in 12 tm lgs I usually value a future 1st around 1.8. Not sure I would do it whether rebuilding or contending, maybe if I had a ton of 1st rd picks and wanted to move some, but if that were the case I would be looking to move a later one. Just my 2 cents, if I felt certain it was bottom 3 team maybe, but it is hard to know that this far away from the start of the season.
You are correct sir. I had offered Collins as a throw in and he wanted Ertz. Fine with me since I agree with menobrown that I would have cut Ertz anyway

It's a contract league and I have a really good team and also had the #6 pick from a previous deal and also picks 15 and 16. Didn't really have room for all 3 picks on my roster without trading or cutting someone I value so rolled the dice that that team I traded with will be a bad team again this year. At absolute worst, I can't see the 2024 pick being lower than the 6th I traded away and it very well could be the #1 overall pick. Team is pretty bad. I had made a conscious effort before the start of the 2022 season to trade for the same guys first rounder anticipating a bad season. I was able to do that and it ended up being the #2 overall pick, but I had traded it mid season for Tee Higgins.

TMI I know but just some background. Under diffferent circumstances such as I was a mid level team looking to contend, I probably wouldn't have done the deal
That is good context, you are established winner (good to be the King!) with multiple picks and roster limitations. You have the flexibility and incentive to take a calculated risk and that makes the deal a lot more sensible. GL!
Fun league. Like the salary cap concept as it forces teams to make decisions on players vs just keeping them forever and generates a lot more trading. Took over a crappy team 3 years ago and was able to turn it around quickly with a lot of wheeling and dealing and some good fortune. Harder to do that in a traditional dynasty.
 
Fun league. Like the salary cap concept as it forces teams to make decisions on players vs just keeping them forever and generates a lot more trading. Took over a crappy team 3 years ago and was able to turn it around quickly with a lot of wheeling and dealing and some good fortune. Harder to do that in a traditional dynasty.
Salary Cap/Contracts is a great way to keep player movement going in a league. When we set up our league we wanted to make it hard for someone to keep a player their entire career. That if it was a top 10 type player you needed to make sacrifices elsewhere to keep him the whole career. It's the primary reason we have escalation clauses for players if they finish in the top 15 of their position in scoring. Their salary goes up (unless under contract). We do allow awarding up to 3 yr contracts for players drafted or obtained in auction. Basically if all teams had an opportunity at a player then you can award a contract. If you are just keeping a guy then he gets a 1 yr contract and is subject to escalation again. Same the following year...etc.

It really keeps things moving and helps from getting stagnant.
 
Team A gets Bijan Robinson and Michael Thomas
Team B gets Saquan Barkley and D’Andre Swift

Thoughts?

These two teams are constantly trading with each other.
Bijan and Thomas by a considerably large amount.
I prefer the Bijan side, but considerable large amount? It's not like the other side are over the hill.


Can't go on enough about getting out from older Rb's for younger Rb's when you can and I mean turning Barkley into Bijan.

And while Thomas is old and has had massive lack of durabilty it's not like Swift is some sure bet and it's very easy for me to see Thomas actually being a better fantasy contributor over next few years then Swift. Now I'm taking Swift between the two but the difference to me is not nearly closing the gap on getting 5 years younger and way less wear and tear with Bijan over Barkley.

So yes, considerable.
 
16-team, SF, PPR, IDP, 50-man rosters + 10 taxi

Not involved.

Team A gets: Walker III, Brian Robinson, Cousins, Jordan Love, Jaquan Brisker (S), and 2x 2023 2nds (both in the 28-32 overall range)

Team B gets: Mahomes

Walker is a nice piece, as is Walker. The 2 QBs are questionable at best (if ARod goes back to GB for another year, Love is worth what exactly?) and safeties are a dime a dozen. It's performance scoring, so Brisker is above average with 100+ TKL & 4 sacks, but that doesn't make this deal great.

This seems really light for Mahomes to me. If the 2nds were 1sts it would make a lot more sense.
 
Team A gets Bijan Robinson and Michael Thomas
Team B gets Saquan Barkley and D’Andre Swift

Thoughts?

These two teams are constantly trading with each other.
Bijan and Thomas by a considerably large amount.
I prefer the Bijan side, but considerable large amount? It's not like the other side are over the hill.


Can't go on enough about getting out from older Rb's for younger Rb's when you can and I mean turning Barkley into Bijan.

And while Thomas is old and has had massive lack of durabilty it's not like Swift is some sure bet and it's very easy for me to see Thomas actually being a better fantasy contributor over next few years then Swift. Now I'm taking Swift between the two but the difference to me is not nearly closing the gap on getting 5 years younger and way less wear and tear with Bijan over Barkley.

So yes, considerable.
Yeah, the more I think about it the more I agree - getting Bijan for Barkley+Swift is the answer here.

I could see it making sense to the team getting Barkley+Swift if they were win-now, but Swift is hardly a reliable asset at this point.
 
Team A gets Bijan Robinson and Michael Thomas
Team B gets Saquan Barkley and D’Andre Swift

Thoughts?

These two teams are constantly trading with each other.
Bijan and Thomas by a considerably large amount.
I prefer the Bijan side, but considerable large amount? It's not like the other side are over the hill.


Can't go on enough about getting out from older Rb's for younger Rb's when you can and I mean turning Barkley into Bijan.

And while Thomas is old and has had massive lack of durabilty it's not like Swift is some sure bet and it's very easy for me to see Thomas actually being a better fantasy contributor over next few years then Swift. Now I'm taking Swift between the two but the difference to me is not nearly closing the gap on getting 5 years younger and way less wear and tear with Bijan over Barkley.

So yes, considerable.
Yeah, the more I think about it the more I agree - getting Bijan for Barkley+Swift is the answer here.

I could see it making sense to the team getting Barkley+Swift if they were win-now, but Swift is hardly a reliable asset at this point.

In terms of startup value it’s a mid 1st for an early 2nd and early 3rd based on one current ADP I looked at, seems about right and I would prefer the 2 to 1. Pegging names to it obviously changes the calculus, enough Swift question marks and Barkleys age where I think most would prefer the allure of Bijan.
 
16-team, SF, PPR, IDP, 50-man rosters + 10 taxi

Not involved.

Team A gets: Walker III, Brian Robinson, Cousins, Jordan Love, Jaquan Brisker (S), and 2x 2023 2nds (both in the 28-32 overall range)

Team B gets: Mahomes

Walker is a nice piece, as is Walker. The 2 QBs are questionable at best (if ARod goes back to GB for another year, Love is worth what exactly?) and safeties are a dime a dozen. It's performance scoring, so Brisker is above average with 100+ TKL & 4 sacks, but that doesn't make this deal great.

This seems really light for Mahomes to me. If the 2nds were 1sts it would make a lot more sense.
I mean fantasy wise Cousins is a great SF QB to have provided you have another QB of similar or better pedigree. The step down from Mahomes to Cousins isn't terrible.

Walker/Robinson have shown NFL ability and could be nice adds. The rest of the package is just window dressing and fodder.

I think it is light for Mahomes but knowing what Team A's roster looks like might make it worth it for Team A.
 
I think it is light for Mahomes but knowing what Team A's roster looks like might make it worth it for Team A.
It’s pretty bad without Mahomes.

The team getting Mahomes now looks like a league-winner.

Shortly after this went down, team B offered me Josh Jacobs and a ‘23 2nd (25th) for Breece Hall. He rescinded the offer before I could reject it with comment.
 
I think it is light for Mahomes but knowing what Team A's roster looks like might make it worth it for Team A
Also, I have no choice but compare it to the haul I got for Mahomes in a 12-team SF.

The equivalent to 5x 1sts (after time & trades, 1.01, 1.04, 1.10, Tee Higgins, Z.Wilson)

Would think in a 16-teamer it would be a better deal than that.
 
FFPC, 1QB
Got: Waddle
Gave: 2024 1st (likely late) and Jameson Williams.

He offered Waddle for Williams and 1.04 (obtained for previous trade). I countered with future late late instead of 1.04 and was accepted.
Fair. Not a bargain. Could go badly if Tua’s career is cut short due to concussion.

That said, I like it much better than Williams and 1.04
 
FFPC, 1QB
Got: Waddle
Gave: 2024 1st (likely late) and Jameson Williams.

He offered Waddle for Williams and 1.04 (obtained for previous trade). I countered with future late late instead of 1.04 and was accepted.
Good deal IMO. Waddle is proven with two very good seasons under his belt. Giving up 1.4 and Williams would have been excessive.
 
FFPC, 1QB
Got: Waddle
Gave: 2024 1st (likely late) and Jameson Williams.

He offered Waddle for Williams and 1.04 (obtained for previous trade). I countered with future late late instead of 1.04 and was accepted.
Good deal IMO. Waddle is proven with two very good seasons under his belt. Giving up 1.4 and Williams would have been excessive.
Pretty much how I see it. I think 1.4 and Jameson for Waddle would have been fair, but I'd not have paid it myself. This is I would be more comfortable doing.
 
FFPC, 1QB
Got: Waddle
Gave: 2024 1st (likely late) and Jameson Williams.

He offered Waddle for Williams and 1.04 (obtained for previous trade). I countered with future late late instead of 1.04 and was accepted.

I don't see the need to make this deal...Waddle is a known quantity...he is a young stud who still has a lot of upside...I like Williams but why gamble on him to become Waddle at the cost of just one future #1...so much room for error here....just not worth the risk of a player of Waddle's caliber.
 
FFPC, 1QB
Got: Waddle
Gave: 2024 1st (likely late) and Jameson Williams.

He offered Waddle for Williams and 1.04 (obtained for previous trade). I countered with future late late instead of 1.04 and was accepted.

I don't see the need to make this deal...Waddle is a known quantity...he is a young stud who still has a lot of upside...I like Williams but why gamble on him to become Waddle at the cost of just one future #1...so much room for error here....just not worth the risk of a player of Waddle's caliber.
I agree. As I suggested above, the risk with Waddle is Tua.

Maybe that’s got the Waddle owner spooked?
 
FFPC, 1QB
Got: Waddle
Gave: 2024 1st (likely late) and Jameson Williams.

He offered Waddle for Williams and 1.04 (obtained for previous trade). I countered with future late late instead of 1.04 and was accepted.

I don't see the need to make this deal...Waddle is a known quantity...he is a young stud who still has a lot of upside...I like Williams but why gamble on him to become Waddle at the cost of just one future #1...so much room for error here....just not worth the risk of a player of Waddle's caliber.
I agree. As I suggested above, the risk with Waddle is Tua.

Maybe that’s got the Waddle owner spooked?

The kid is only 24 and has an offense-first HC from the Shanahan tree...if Tua's injuries catch up to him they will find another QB.
 
Last edited:
FFPC, 1QB
Got: Waddle
Gave: 2024 1st (likely late) and Jameson Williams.

He offered Waddle for Williams and 1.04 (obtained for previous trade). I countered with future late late instead of 1.04 and was accepted.

I don't see the need to make this deal...Waddle is a known quantity...he is a young stud who still has a lot of upside...I like Williams but why gamble on him to become Waddle at the cost of just one future #1...so much room for error here....just not worth the risk of a player of Waddle's caliber.
I agree. As I suggested above, the risk with Waddle is Tua.

Maybe that’s got the Waddle owner spooked?

The kid is only 24 and has an offense-first HC from the Shanahan tre...if Tua's injuries catch up to him they will find another QB.
Easier said than done though. I get what you’re saying, but we’ve seen talent squandered before due to QB issues.
 
FFPC, 1QB
Got: Waddle
Gave: 2024 1st (likely late) and Jameson Williams.

He offered Waddle for Williams and 1.04 (obtained for previous trade). I countered with future late late instead of 1.04 and was accepted.
Good deal IMO. Waddle is proven with two very good seasons under his belt. Giving up 1.4 and Williams would have been excessive.
Pretty much how I see it. I think 1.4 and Jameson for Waddle would have been fair, but I'd not have paid it myself. This is I would be more comfortable doing.
I'd take the1st/Williams side. But I am very high on Williams.
 
FFPC, 1QB
Got: Waddle
Gave: 2024 1st (likely late) and Jameson Williams.

He offered Waddle for Williams and 1.04 (obtained for previous trade). I countered with future late late instead of 1.04 and was accepted.
Good deal IMO. Waddle is proven with two very good seasons under his belt. Giving up 1.4 and Williams would have been excessive.
Pretty much how I see it. I think 1.4 and Jameson for Waddle would have been fair, but I'd not have paid it myself. This is I would be more comfortable doing.
I'd take the1st/Williams side. But I am very high on Williams.
I agree, and would take Williams and the 1st.
 
Pretty decent team in FFPC decimated by injuries and waiting for DeShaun to return, made a run in the consolation playoffs for 1,01 and finished with 1.02. Was going to take J.Gibbs at 1.02 but just accepted 1.02 for 1.03 & 2.03. Going to take J.Smith-Njigba at 1.03 as I'm weaker at WR and pick up 2.03. I also have 1.07, 2.02, 2.06 & 2.12 to add at RB
 
Pretty decent team in FFPC decimated by injuries and waiting for DeShaun to return, made a run in the consolation playoffs for 1,01 and finished with 1.02. Was going to take J.Gibbs at 1.02 but just accepted 1.02 for 1.03 & 2.03. Going to take J.Smith-Njigba at 1.03 as I'm weaker at WR and pick up 2.03. I also have 1.07, 2.02, 2.06 & 2.12 to add at RB
Who are your RBs?
Either way value seems fine
 
Ackers, Pacheco, Gibson, J.Connor, M.Carter, I.Spiller - nothing great but at WR I have Olave, Higgins, JuJu and T.Boyd, so the WR need is greater and a longer carear trajectory so I'm fine with JSN over Gibbs and getting 2.03 in the deal
 
Pretty decent team in FFPC decimated by injuries and waiting for DeShaun to return, made a run in the consolation playoffs for 1,01 and finished with 1.02. Was going to take J.Gibbs at 1.02 but just accepted 1.02 for 1.03 & 2.03. Going to take J.Smith-Njigba at 1.03 as I'm weaker at WR and pick up 2.03. I also have 1.07, 2.02, 2.06 & 2.12 to add at RB

This is a personal preference trade...it all depends on your draft board...if you like JSN as much as Gibbs (or really like that 2.3) than it makes sended although I hope you are still comfortable with this deal if JSN goes #2.
 
Last edited:
Pretty decent team in FFPC decimated by injuries and waiting for DeShaun to return, made a run in the consolation playoffs for 1,01 and finished with 1.02. Was going to take J.Gibbs at 1.02 but just accepted 1.02 for 1.03 & 2.03. Going to take J.Smith-Njigba at 1.03 as I'm weaker at WR and pick up 2.03. I also have 1.07, 2.02, 2.06 & 2.12 to add at RB
I'd have held the 1.2 myself. Yes part of that is liking Gibbs more but even if I liked JSN more I'd have still held. The 2.3 is nice but I'd want more control over my top picks destiny and know for the next few months I get any player in the draft not named Bijan.
 
Pretty decent team in FFPC decimated by injuries and waiting for DeShaun to return, made a run in the consolation playoffs for 1,01 and finished with 1.02. Was going to take J.Gibbs at 1.02 but just accepted 1.02 for 1.03 & 2.03. Going to take J.Smith-Njigba at 1.03 as I'm weaker at WR and pick up 2.03. I also have 1.07, 2.02, 2.06 & 2.12 to add at RB
I'd have held the 1.2 myself. Yes part of that is liking Gibbs more but even if I liked JSN more I'd have still held. The 2.3 is nice but I'd want more control over my top picks destiny and know for the next few months I get any player in the draft not named Bijan.

About three weeks ago in 1QB FFPC, I offered the 1.03 and Pacheco for the 1.02, and then offered 1.03, 2.11 and Chig Okwonko for the 1.02. Other team rejected both and said he wanted to wait for the draft. (My motive was basically to see if he countered so I had an idea of just how much he wanted, but seems he's in meno's camp and wants to sit on the pick for a while.)
 
About three weeks ago in 1QB FFPC, I offered the 1.03 and Pacheco for the 1.02, and then offered 1.03, 2.11 and Chig Okwonko for the 1.02. Other team rejected both and said he wanted to wait for the draft. (My motive was basically to see if he countered so I had an idea of just how much he wanted, but seems he's in meno's camp and wants to sit on the pick for a while.)

The key for me, the way I view this is the draft starts at 1.2. I just want to be able to know if any top prospect should ascend in value for whatever reasons to point they are clear cut in a tier above the rest I want to be in position to benefit from that. This is same way I'd view it if I had 1.1 in a draft that did not have a clear cut top prospect, would take a lot to move me off the spot of being able to get a potential ascending player. Obviously the risk is at the end of the day the guy picking 3 might see no difference in who he can get at 2 or 3 and you lost the 2.3. That's a risk I'm willing to take really in any draft but this year it's really easy for me because I do in fact have Gibbs in his own tier right now.

I would however have accepted this is if was any pick other then 1.2. So if I had 1.3 and someone offered me 1.4 and 2.3 we'd have a deal.
 
(My motive was basically to see if he countered so I had an idea of just how much he wanted, but seems he's in meno's camp and wants to sit on the pick for a while.)
I have half the picks in the 1st in one league and have been rejecting offers.

I’m waiting until the combine, the NFL draft, and likely for our league’s actual draft to decide if I want to move any.

Every year there’s a ton of player movement in the months leading up to the (FF) draft. And it seems like the most possible value can be extracted from a pick when actually OTC. Picks turn into player possibilities, and FF managers covet those players in the heat of the moment.

Now at 1.04 in SF I’m not dealing the 1.04 so much as I’m dealing Gibbs. I might not deal the pick, but I might float the idea to see how many teams are willing to pay for it. Never know what kind of offer comes in.
 
Last edited:
(My motive was basically to see if he countered so I had an idea of just how much he wanted, but seems he's in meno's camp and wants to sit on the pick for a while.)
I have half the picks in the 1st in one league and have been rejecting offers.

I’m waiting until the combine, the NFL draft, and likely for our league’s actual draft to decide if I want to move any.

Every year there’s a ton of player movement in the months leading up to the (FF) draft. And it seems like the most possible value can be extracted from a pick when actually OTC. Picks turn into player possibilities, and FF managers covet those players in the heat of the moment.

Now at 1.04 in SF I’m not dealing the 1.04 so much as I’m dealing Gibbs. I might. It deal the pick, but I might float the idea to see how many teams are willing to pay for it. Never know what kind of offer comes in.
Crunch time, Prices go up! I agree with holding until OTC. I have so many needs, moving from 1.07 to 1.11 could be worth the move pending offers.
I have only gotten a few offers recently. I am also waiting until after Combine & NFL draft to even consider anything. So, when I am OTC, I can look.
 
(My motive was basically to see if he countered so I had an idea of just how much he wanted, but seems he's in meno's camp and wants to sit on the pick for a while.)
I have half the picks in the 1st in one league and have been rejecting offers.

I’m waiting until the combine, the NFL draft, and likely for our league’s actual draft to decide if I want to move any.

Every year there’s a ton of player movement in the months leading up to the (FF) draft. And it seems like the most possible value can be extracted from a pick when actually OTC. Picks turn into player possibilities, and FF managers covet those players in the heat of the moment.

Now at 1.04 in SF I’m not dealing the 1.04 so much as I’m dealing Gibbs. I might. It deal the pick, but I might float the idea to see how many teams are willing to pay for it. Never know what kind of offer comes in.

The second bolded part is especially true when you are essentially the gatekeeper for half the first round.
 
I moved 1.04 for 2024 (late) 1st, 2nd (early), 3rd (early) and 2.10.

I agree that holding often yields the most value but thought this was a really strong offer so accepted. In one league where I have 4 1st round picks I don’t mind moving one early because I honestly don’t want to make all those picks and own all those rookies anyways so being the first to obtain 2024 draft capital is sometimes important to me when I feel others will be looking to move ‘23 to ‘24 picks as well. Beat them to the punch with those owners that are willing to move multiple ‘24 picks for a ‘23 1st
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top