I'm ok with a team trading Jacobs who probably hit his pinnacle last year. But the only way it makes sense is if you're getting the 1.02 or 1.03 this year. At 1.06 he should have at least picked up a 2.06 to make it more even. I don't see him getting 340 attempts again this year.
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
****OFFICIAL DYNASTY TRADES**** (16 Viewers)
- Thread starter Gottabesweet
- Start date
mashedbananas
Footballguy
12 Team, 28 man rosters. SF and TE Premium (2 PPR) . 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR,, 1 TE , 1 SF, 2 Flex
Traded 1.03 and 2.03
Got 1.08, 1.10 and Najee Harris
Edit to add - other owner is in a complete rebuild. Currently he does not have a starting QB, and he has 1.02, and with the 1.03 he is probably going to draft 2 QBs, and he has 2.02 and 2.03 still to add to his team. I had told him I was looking to trade down to 1.05 or 1.06 as we got closer to the draft as I have a tier of 7, but he made the offer above so I grabbed it. I think there is a chance it will work out for both of us, though of course I like my side better.
Traded 1.03 and 2.03
Got 1.08, 1.10 and Najee Harris
Edit to add - other owner is in a complete rebuild. Currently he does not have a starting QB, and he has 1.02, and with the 1.03 he is probably going to draft 2 QBs, and he has 2.02 and 2.03 still to add to his team. I had told him I was looking to trade down to 1.05 or 1.06 as we got closer to the draft as I have a tier of 7, but he made the offer above so I grabbed it. I think there is a chance it will work out for both of us, though of course I like my side better.
Last edited:
ghostguy123
Footballguy
Wow. Give me your side
Jonesin For Some Football
Footballguy
I get this is SF and Jeudy/Burks still has value. I also absolutely love Bijan but JJ is the best asset in fantasy and JT isn't old. Just was banged up with a non-soft tissue injury last year. I think this is JJ/JT easily.10 team SF, not involved:
Team A sends: Jefferson, Taylor
Team B sends: Daniel Jones, Jeudy, Burks, 1.01
jordan if you're reading please comment on this one after a league mate picked up on you severely criticising me for sending waller and evans last week, it has been requested after it was noticed you picked up on the previous trade
barackdhouse
Footballguy
FFPC SuperFlex, different leagues:
I gave Dulcich
I got Otton, 3.01
I gave Zeke
I got 3.08
I gave M Carter
I got 5.04
I gave D Adams, Evans
I got Burks, Mooney, 3.09
FFPC 1QB:
I gave 2024 4th
I got M Carter
FFPC 1QB not involved:
Team A gave Allgeier, 3.05
Team B gave Jeff Wilson, 1.09
FFPC SuperFlex not involved:
Team A gave Toney
Team B gave 4.05
Team C gave Nuk
Team D gave 1.12
Team E gave E Moore
Team F gave 2.07
I gave Dulcich
I got Otton, 3.01
I gave Zeke
I got 3.08
I gave M Carter
I got 5.04
I gave D Adams, Evans
I got Burks, Mooney, 3.09
FFPC 1QB:
I gave 2024 4th
I got M Carter
FFPC 1QB not involved:
Team A gave Allgeier, 3.05
Team B gave Jeff Wilson, 1.09
FFPC SuperFlex not involved:
Team A gave Toney
Team B gave 4.05
Team C gave Nuk
Team D gave 1.12
Team E gave E Moore
Team F gave 2.07
Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
Jeez, makin me work today!
I see those TEs as roughly equal in potential outcomes, so gimme the 3rd.
I'm assuming the roster size makes Zeke harder to hold onto? I guess that's fair value. How the mighty have fallen.
Again, not a lot of return, but with Hall coming back, Carter probably isn't worth much.
I like this one, but there is potential to kick yourself in 2023 as Evans and/or Adams could both have good seasons. Probably not great though, and you got younger with 2 players I do like
Neither have the upside of Adams/Evans, but then, Adams/Evans likely don't have that upside any more given age/situations.
Now buying Carter. Interesting. Assuming this team is hurting at RB or you have Hall and wanted the handcuff?
1.09 side. Team B got robbed. I might rather have Wilson than Algeier.
I'll take Toney here. That's cheap.
2023 - Probably the last time Nuke commands a 1st. I'm on the 1.12 side here if I'm not immediately contending. That 1.10-2.05 range has a lot of potentially great values at RB and TE, and even a WR or 2.
That said, Nuk will likely be traded to a good offense, so there's value there if one don't mind him dying on one's roster.
I sold Nuk for a 108 in 2021. Then he was hurt, then suspended - shocking he's only worth 4 picks less here in 2023. Hope springs eternal I guess.
Coin flip - I'd probably lean the Moore side but it's really close. Like buying a lottery ticket - Browns traded for Moore, which means they like him, but they didn't give up much for him, so it's not like he's guaranteed to get a ton of chances if he doesn't show out early. They have a lot of depth at WR and I could see DPJ or others move past him on the depth chart in camp.
But he's worth a flier, and 2.07 is pretty affordable. Personally I'd add a pick to that and try to get Bateman.
barackdhouse
Footballguy
Jeez, makin me work today!
I see those TEs as roughly equal in potential outcomes, so gimme the 3rd. Same here and I have Goedert as my TE1 with cuts looming easy to just take the pick.
I'm assuming the roster size makes Zeke harder to hold onto? I guess that's fair value. How the mighty have fallen. Yeah this is my most difficult roster to make cuts with this week (Friday at midnite) and Zeke is done. Now he is a roster clogger on an opponent's team. Win win for me lose lose for them.
Again, not a lot of return, but with Hall coming back, Carter probably isn't worth much. I have Barkley/Taylor/CMC here and with SuperFlex and cuts Carter probably wasn't making it. I'll take a lil value vs 0.
I like this one, but there is potential to kick yourself in 2023 as Evans and/or Adams could both have good seasons. Probably not great though, and you got younger with 2 players I do like
Neither have the upside of Adams/Evans, but then, Adams/Evans likely don't have that upside any more given age/situations. This roster of mine is not competing this year and it is a very inactive league. Needed to get out of Adams and Evans while I can. Now have Lamb/Burks WR core but long ways to go elsewhere. It is SF and I have...*looks at spreadsheet...*Darnold as QB1? No wait it is Dalton. I mean settings require I hold one QB through cuts so it's one of those two. Puke. And I'm weak at TE and RB.
Now buying Carter. Interesting. Assuming this team is hurting at RB or you have Hall and wanted the handcuff? This roster on the other hand is super weak at RB and I don't mind the depth or potential early season production if Breece isn't quite ready or reduced workload, etc. I have a ton of picks and some solid young talent and am ready to try and compete this year but envision Carter as a guy that would be like my RB4 or 5 and hopefully by midseason I've moved on. A 4th rounder is nothing here.
1.09 side. Team B got robbed. I might rather have Wilson than Algeier. I like Allgeier a bit but not this much. Unless it's someone in our Sharkpool league and then I would consider a 1st plus a RB like this.
I'll take Toney here. That's cheap. One of those proverbial trades where I'm like dang wish I'd known I could have got him that cheap. Not sure I'd sell for less than 2.0x
2023 - Probably the last time Nuke commands a 1st. I'm on the 1.12 side here if I'm not immediately contending. That 1.10-2.05 range has a lot of potentially great values at RB and TE, and even a WR or 2.
That said, Nuk will likely be traded to a good offense, so there's value there if one don't mind him dying on one's roster.
I sold Nuk for a 108 in 2021. Then he was hurt, then suspended - shocking he's only worth 4 picks less here in 2023. Hope springs eternal I guess. I've never got a nibble on my one share of Nuk in three years. I'm uber elite and young in that one spot and would love to get something like this for Nuk to clear the roster spot.
Coin flip - I'd probably lean the Moore side but it's really close. Like buying a lottery ticket - Browns traded for Moore, which means they like him, but they didn't give up much for him, so it's not like he's guaranteed to get a ton of chances if he doesn't show out early. They have a lot of depth at WR and I could see DPJ or others move past him on the depth chart in camp.
But he's worth a flier, and 2.07 is pretty affordable. Personally I'd add a pick to that and try to get Bateman. Yeah I agree coin flip. I probably take the pick and the roster spot.
Dulchich by a lot, consider him most likely winner of Payton hire and a true chance of a difference making kind of TE. Otton is replacement level for fantasy. I plan on cutting him in two leagues I have him after not being able to get anything of value so far in a trade for hm.
Fair if rebuilding but in general I like Adams/Evans value. I'm not big on Mooney.
3.8
5.4
The 4th
1.9
Toney massively, my winner for biggest disparity of any of these trades.
Fair
Elijah by a healthy margin.
barackdhouse
Footballguy
Yeah man I agree about all your other comments and even this one as well, except for the by a lot part. But I thought of you when I did this trade and figured you'd feel this way. I know you like Dulcich but I do actually like him a lot as well. And a bit more than Otton, who I consider a small notch above replacement level. I think they both have upside, with the Payton hire being a big boost to that potential for sure. But I don't think the gap is that big and the 3.01 in SuperFlex is a bit juicier than most people think. For me it more than closes the gap but I certainly have no problem paying that price for someone I believe in either. I'm not there yet with Dulcich because yes I actually do still think Albert O will compete with him for targets (but certainly plausibly a distant 2nd) but also because Russell Wilson is a cheeseball that has fallen off the deep end. Ironically the only Denver fantasy player I have any interest in whatsoever is Dulcich but in this case I consider the 3.01 to actually be the most valuable piece in the trade (marginally).
I also have a lot of Dulcich elsewhere.
barackdhouse
Footballguy
TLDR I think the two TE's range of outcomes overlap enough to easily take the 3.01.
Jonesin For Some Football
Footballguy
I will say that I totally agree that the value is on the Jacobs side here and I'd make that move and I have 1.06. However, Jacobs has only had 1 great year (solid others but not spectacular), only on the franchise tag, and the Raiders could be worse this year. A good owner that is deep at RB, deserves the benefit of the doubt and I can see his thinking but agree that he didn't get enough value.
Jonesin For Some Football
Footballguy
I'm not a huge Najee fan with Pickett under center but I think this was a good move for you. I really like 1.03 this year but to get Harris and a 5 pick upgrade from 2.03 to move down 5 spots in SF where talent should still be there at 1.08 is a solid move. Great value for the 1.03 here, especially if you weren't completely sold on JSN/Gibbs.
Jonesin For Some Football
Footballguy
I also view these 2 similar (although I would take Dulcich over Otton straight up) but if I was getting pick 25 out of the deal, I would take the Otton/3.01 side.
I'd probably wait until Zeke signed somewhere and depend on my RB/competing situation but that is probably fair value. Zeke could still be a TD vulture for a decent team this year.
I'd take the 5.04 as Hall will be back and Carter probably can't hold off Bam Knight. Plus, they are considering adding Zeke. Carter is a whatever ever you can get instead of cut guy now.
I get the thought of going young and if you truly don't want to let guys die on your team then you probably have to take something like this but this is terrible value to me. Burks underperformed, was probably overdrafted last year, and is on a team that doesn't throw. Mooney also had a down year and DJM just got traded there on a team that runs all day so he doesn't have much value for me. 3.09 is a low end dart throw so to me you got very little value back for Adams who was still a top 5 WR last year and Evans who could bounce back. I like the thought but this feels like making a move jus to get younger. I guess if you have no chance of winning or making the playoffs you do this, but any chance of sneaking in and should have kept the studs.
If you want to take a dart throw on Carter I guess this is ok but he probably doesn't hold much value with Hall, Knight, and maybe another added on like Zeke for short yardage. A future 4th for a possible lottery ticket isn't bad though.
This is robbery as Allgeier isn't worth close to the 1.09 by itself. Definitely shouldn't have been done until the draft when we see if ATL drafts another RB. I don't agree with a previous statement that I'd rather have Wilson over him but this would be fair if that pick was the 2.09.
I'm not a huge Toney guy but this is way too light for him. Especially since KC hasn't added any WRs. They showed they want to try to use him and he has some talent. I'd pay any 3rd all day for him right now and he is probably worth a late 2nd depending on what KC does in the draft at WR.
I don't think Nuk is still worth this, especially with his situation up in the air. No way I make this trade unless I saw him get traded to a spot I liked. Just too much to give up at his age, plus injuries, and situation.
I can see both sides of this. Moore has talent so this isn't a ton to give up (especially in 1 QB as I think the drop off in talent in the draft comes a few picks before 2.07). He is in a new home and who knows who will be Watson's guy when he gets back in to the swing of things. However, I could easily see a world where AC and DPJ get a ton of love along with Njoku and Moore is not playable. Risk there but depending on roster, I get the argument both ways.
barackdhouse
Footballguy
We definitely differ on Burks. I think he flashed plenty but had nagging and fluky injuries that I have no reason to think will be a problem going forward. Yes the Titans don't pass a lot but they are likely to go to him the most when they do. He is set up for a large target share. Part of this is also betting on talent over situation. I like his situation better than Evans. Agree Adams is still a total stud and still probably the best actual WR in the league but I don't believe in Jimmy G or the Raiders and like I said my team is not competing regardless. So I don't think situation is any kind of tiebreaker but youth and talent are (for me).
I'm not going to try and defend Mooney's value here. My best case for him is that he and DJ Moore make each other better and Mooney sort of plateaus out as one of those WR3/4 types that we're always complaining about but are never terrible to throw in your lineup when you need to.
Jonesin For Some Football
Footballguy
If not competing then it isn't bad, if you believe in Burks that much. You hold for another year and probably can't give Evans away so I get it. I would just want a decently better player than Mooney or a much higher pick than 3.09 but I understand and sometimes you take what you can get.
barackdhouse
Footballguy
It's been tough to get anything going. So many teams for sale or otherwise inactive. So few owners use the message boards or trading blocks. And most of the offers I get suck.
joey
Footballguy
Re: the bolded….in this league, at the beginning of last seasons, I posted “let’s see if we can get some chatter going on the message board this year” and that single message just sat there all season with no reply.
if I didn’t win it all in year 2 of that league, and weren’t currently in the middle of a very successful rebuild (1.1, 1.6, 1.8, 2 2nds, 2 3rds this year added to Herbert, Walker, Javonte, Allgeier, KHerbert, Olave, Pittman, Toney, Andrews) I might be looking to move on from this league.
but yeah, it’s tough in these random FFPC leagues to get things going sometimes. Last season was very active for me though (as you can tell by the picks I have).
Fingers crossed that the usual FFPC Cutdown Week flurry of activity will hit shortly.
Marauder
Footballguy
It definitely varies from league to league. I have one league that has had 29 trades since they rolled over to the new year in Feburary. Other leagues that have only had 1 or 2. Overall the trading volume does seem less than in previous years.
I got one like that and in fact I posted last year about this same time that league had not made a trade from around the in-season trade deadline to about this time. This year the last trade was made in October.
Last year the thaw got broke with a few days to go when two new owners came into the league. As of right now the league has 4 teams listed for sale. Big reason it's hard to make trades when 1/3rd of the league does not really exist yet, and some of the current 8 almost never deal.
Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
My leagues used to be like that, but you can sort of influence it a bit. For example, I’m super active in both my leagues and it pays off.
In the league I took over n orphan last year I was told by a couple members that trades were rare. 16 team SF, TE-P. I think I’ve made 12 trades. lol
This year I kept the conversations going with a few of the managers via GroupMe from Super Bowl on. I was making trades before 1/3 of the teams had renewed. I managed to get Bateman & Mayfield (SF, don’t judge
) and the next two teams to renew came in looking for WR & QB respectively.Early bird gets the worm. I also feel like some of the Best buy-low gambles are to be had in Feb-March, so I especially try to get things done that time of year.
Hopefully you can get your league more motivated.
eighsse2
Footballguy
There have been two trades in our league since the regular season trade deadline. Both involving me. Send out enough offers, eventually get a couple done...
Birdie048
Footballguy
Agreed. So few efforts right now. Most owners won’t look at it until after NFL draft /right before our Rookie Draft early May.
I’ve sent out several offers & inquiries with only 1 counter that I just couldn’t accept. I realize some of my offers are starting points and values are subjective but no feedback is different. Ghosted league
eighsse2
Footballguy
Some people are of the opinion that is just not wise to trade while there are so many unknowns (free agency, draft, trades). But everything has a value, at all times. Those values are just really volatile right now -- but hey, when are they not really volatile? In the middle of the season, when major injuries are far more likely than the offseason?
I respect that opinion though. But I'm always looking to make my team better. It's a gamble, but not making a move is a gamble too.Da Franchise
Footballguy
Not sure what price tags you guys play in, but I’ve found leagues under $500 and over $1250 to be pretty quiet. The lower levels people just don’t seem to care enough and the highest levels seem to create a little paralysis. Every league is different of course, that’s just how it’s gone for me.
Last edited:
eighsse2
Footballguy
Entry fees? Ours is only $50.
Da Franchise
Footballguy
Sorry, that was meant for the FFPC crowd.
barackdhouse
Footballguy
FFPC roster cutdowns are due this Friday night, and this tends to drive a lot of trade activity. In fact it is the busiest time of year in FFPC for trading between the SB and March 31st. But I do think the mystery and unknowns you speak of this time of year do make people gunshy. It is a very unique time for trading. People will sell players for uber cheap because they'd rather get something than nothing (like my Carter for 5.0x above). Toney for 4.0x etc.Some people are of the opinion that is just not wise to trade while there are so many unknowns (free agency, draft, trades). But everything has a value, at all times. Those values are just really volatile right now -- but hey, when are they not really volatile? In the middle of the season, when major injuries are far more likely than the offseason?
jtd13
Footballguy
PPR 12 team 1QB
Gave: Jameson + 2024 1st (from 2x champ, very likely late).
Received: London + 2.09
Same league, not involved:
Team A: Ceedee Lamb
Team B: 1.08, 1.09, 1.10
Team A: 1.10 + James Cook
Team C: Austin Ekeler
Team D: Miles Sanders, 3.08, 4.10
Team C: Derrick Henry
Gave: Jameson + 2024 1st (from 2x champ, very likely late).
Received: London + 2.09
Same league, not involved:
Team A: Ceedee Lamb
Team B: 1.08, 1.09, 1.10
Team A: 1.10 + James Cook
Team C: Austin Ekeler
Team D: Miles Sanders, 3.08, 4.10
Team C: Derrick Henry
Da Franchise
Footballguy
I had Jameson over London in ranks but I still like the move. Value is fine so it’s a “go get your guy” situation.
Can’t believe someone would trade Lamb for that.
Can’t believe someone would trade Ekeler for that.
Can’t believe someone would trade Henry for that.
I’ll elaborate on Henry. It’s certainly not a move a contender would make. And if you’re not a contender, why are you dealing him, in March, for Sanders who most already view as old and just arrived to a much worse offensive team in a much worse situation for fantasy? This is not how you get something for an aging stud.
Boston
Footballguy
I see what both teams are doing...London looked the part last year and Williams is still an unknown as far as the NFL is concerned...my fear for London is the Atlanta situation and whether that will allow him to maximize his stats...my fear on the Williams side (besides the unknown) is Detroit taking another WR with a first-round pick, that would really ding Williams...overall I will call it a wash as both London and Williams have high upsides and legit questions as far as fantasy is concerned but I do like getting that future #1 but this deal is really about your personal preference of London or Williams.
Give me Lamb...three 1st round picks is a lot on the surface but Lamb is a stud and in this draft those picks are not as appealing as some other years.
If you believe in Cook this is an ok cash out for a 28-year RB...if your team is close that is not a lot to give up for a legit difference-maker.
Give me Henry easily...Sanders landed in a nice spot but that is not a lot to give up for Henry...the second piece of that deal has to be a lot better (like a real lot)...and let's remember that Sanders will be 26 in May so it's not like you are getting a young RB here.
Last edited:
Da Franchise
Footballguy
I’m not at all down on this draft but dealing Lamb for 3 late 1sts is crazy to me. You’d have to bring me one top 3 pick to get my attention. This draft is super deep but late 1sts aren’t much better than early or mid 2nds to me. There will certainly be some desirable contributors there but it’s no sure thing. I’m not dealing a true stud for three wishes.
Put it this way…the rookies those picks yield will probably come off the board in rounds 5-7 of a startup. Lamb is top 5. Anybody willing to make that deal?
Then, they turn around and deal for Ekeler? Huh? It’s great value for him but you just drastically reduced your chances of competing this year by trading Lamb and then turn around and get a guy with maybe a 2 year shelf life. These are contradictory strategies.
Edit- or maybe I have it backwards. Maybe they traded for Lamb and dealt Ekeler. The original trade showed what teams gave so I assumed that carried through to the other deals. It would make more sense if consolidating picks for a young stud WR and then cashing out Ekeler. But it’s bad value and timing for Ekeler.
Edit 2- Team C getting Henry and Ekeler for Sanders, Cook, and 1.10 looks like a big winner to me.
Put it this way…the rookies those picks yield will probably come off the board in rounds 5-7 of a startup. Lamb is top 5. Anybody willing to make that deal?
Then, they turn around and deal for Ekeler? Huh? It’s great value for him but you just drastically reduced your chances of competing this year by trading Lamb and then turn around and get a guy with maybe a 2 year shelf life. These are contradictory strategies.
Edit- or maybe I have it backwards. Maybe they traded for Lamb and dealt Ekeler. The original trade showed what teams gave so I assumed that carried through to the other deals. It would make more sense if consolidating picks for a young stud WR and then cashing out Ekeler. But it’s bad value and timing for Ekeler.
Edit 2- Team C getting Henry and Ekeler for Sanders, Cook, and 1.10 looks like a big winner to me.
Last edited:
jtd13
Footballguy
Sorry, probably laid it out in a confusing manner while trying to link the teams making moves.
The same owner was selling Ekeler and then going all in to get Lamb. I guess he wanted to consolidate to one stud WR while dumping RBs. I forgot to mention he also moved Dalvin and 2.08 for 1.09 before that. So all told he moved off of 2 aging RBs plus 1.08/2.08 for a young stud WR and a younger RB.
The Henry deal I found annoying because I made him a similar offer when he put Henry on the block (Akers and 4.02 for Henry, but only because I didn't have a better pick to throw in) and didn't get a counter. A few days later that one went through.
Da Franchise
Footballguy
That does make more sense, but I still don’t like the Ekeler deal. This is just the worst time of year to trade aging vets. The Dalvin trade seems light to me also.
And for the record I hate RBs so I don’t mind moving those pieces. Just don’t like the return and especially the timing much at all.
I did not read ahead so as not to have my comments influenced by others, so if some additional context was provided I don't know it yet.
It's fair to me but I never had Jameson quite equal to London, injury or not. Not far off, just not quite equal.
Lamb and for me to even start to consider otherwise this would need to be one of those 30 player roster sized leagues and my roster was barren. Saying that I don't view Lamb as a special talent, but he's a really good young talent getting a lot of targets and I'll take that over 3 in the bush.
On surface is a good move to cash in Ekeler if you are rebuilding and to make this move for him if you are contending. But I'm a little soft on Cook but I also I don't like investing something close to value of two late #1's or at worst a late one and early 2 for a 28 year old RB in a contract dispute. This is one context would have mattered a lot.
Seems fair to me but I'd take Sanders. See above, I don't like investing in 28-29 year old RB's. Ironically Ekeler and Henry are both outliers to my age 27 RB decline study. But I've always considered wear and tear with in that equation and I think that's been a big help to Ekeler. Henry is just a straight outlier of outliers. Still, I'm sticking to my guns on when it's good to exit out on a RB.
Jonesin For Some Football
Footballguy
I like London more than Williams and as long as that 24 1st stays late then I like that side for sure.
This is the right value for Lamb as 3 1sts seems right but one of those 1sts has to be top 3. If they were getting JSN/1.09/1.10 then I could be ok with that value. Not this.
This isn't nearly enough for Ek. I know he is aging and wants a new team/contract but Cooks just isn't enough. Especially as I think the Bills draft another RB in the draft.
King Henry should go for much more than this. Either both picks should be higher or Sanders should be a much younger RB. He just got paid but 3.08/4.10 isn't much to add at all.
oldmanhawkins
Footballguy
Made a few trades this AM.
Gave: Ridley and OBJ
Got: 1.11 and Tim Patrick
Gave: 1.12 and 2.03
Got: Javonte and 4.01
I’m rebuilding but like the value for Javonte and still hold 1.01, 1.06, 1.11, 2.01, 2.07. Only so many guys I am gonna like.
Gave: Ridley and OBJ
Got: 1.11 and Tim Patrick
Gave: 1.12 and 2.03
Got: Javonte and 4.01
I’m rebuilding but like the value for Javonte and still hold 1.01, 1.06, 1.11, 2.01, 2.07. Only so many guys I am gonna like.
ghostguy123
Footballguy
Jesus I need to start making offers for Javante
In an FFPC superflex, I had an offer on the table: Javonte for my '24 R1. Seemed fair, but I let it sit because I hate this league and didn't want to put down a deposit to trade my R1 pick. He ended up getting traded that day.
Team A gave: Javonte Williams, '24 R3
Team B gave: 1.09
Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
Ridley’s value has been rising…this feels a little light.
This was an absolute bargain. I can’t believe you got a pick back too.
Overall not bad. You stole Javonte and turned Ridley into a 1st.
Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
That was my 1st thought.
ghostguy123
Footballguy
Picture year ago saying "a year from now Javante will be worth the same as Ridley". WTF??
Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
Incredible. Feels like an anomaly. Dude in my 12-team wants a 1st +
ghostguy123
Footballguy
I'd say he didn't maximize the value of 1.01........
Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
It’s light, but seemingly not outrageously so. He gets Aiyuk, who’s looked better and better, and 2x 1sts. 1.09 and a 2024 1st.
I certainly wouldn’t take it, but I could see someone taking it.
For Best Ball it’s probably better to have the best players / most upside for big games, better floor, too? Maybe the format skews this scenario further than I recognize, but it doesn’t feel all that lopsided.
Aiyuk isn't anything special in this format (start two WRs). Team trading for the 1.01 consistently finishes in the top 4, so his '24 1st will be late, plus he has Amon-Ra at WR and Jonathan Taylor at RB. If you're giving up Bijan, then at the very least you should insist on getting back a player who's better than Aiyuk.
Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
The context of start 2 WR definitely changes things. Good info.
I don't own Aiyuk but I think he might be the most under utilized WR in the NFL and I think he has legit top 5 WR potential. But that's just a hope down the road that would require a series of events to go his way at which time he'd be like 27 at best if it worked out. So I can't justify the trade and find it kind of funny the poor guy had to kick in a third.
