and if you're going to use sluggers from 2004 to compare to sluggers from 1964, I'm going to shoot holes left and right in your argument. just so you know in advance.
Guys that had better individual seasons from 1955-1975 (the era you cited) than ANY SEASON Hank Aaron had during that time:Mantle '57
Williams '57
Morgan '75
Mantle '61
Williams '55
McCovey '69
Mays '55
Cash '61
Mays '57
Snider '55
Yaz '70
Mantle '55
Mays '58
Mays '65
Robinson '62
Mantle '62
Morgan '73
Mantle '58
Murcer '71
Mays '64
McCovey '70
Morgan '74
Robinson '61
Williams '56
Morgan '72
And that's just in his era. He played very well for a long time, but he was never great.
I would've preferred that we didn't name undrafted players, but they'll all be taken anyways.The thing is, you're clearly missing the point here. Just because other players had great individual seasons doesn't mean Aaron's accomplishments weren't great as well. His '71 was outstanding. So was his '62 and '63 season. And what made it all EVEN BETTER was the fact that he did for almost 20 seasons straight. You're building an argument with no base..
hey these players had great seasons, so Hank's wasn't great on it's own.
And you're argument is weak at best. How much better was Duke Snider's '55 season than Hank's?
Hank in '71-47-118-327 BA-410 OBP-669 slg
Duke in '55 - 42-136-309 BA-418 OBP-628 slg
What am I missing? So Duke was great in '55, but Hank wasn't in '71?
WTF?