***OFFICIAL*** FFA MLB Draft (1 Viewer)

[UCONN]

Did someone turn fatigue off?? All of my guys have been showing 100 percent after every game, including pitchers.

WIS FAQ covers this question. Basically, it's not unusual for players to show some fatigue early in the season after high-scoring games, and then for that fatigue to more or less go away as time goes on.All my batters pretty much stay at 100% except for Trammell, who dips into the mid-90s pretty often (he has the fewest AB of any of my starters except my Cs).Dan Plesac, who pitched only 62 innings in his third salary year, can hardly be used in back-to-back games though he was a closer in real life. He drops down into the 40s after 20 pitches or so. I now have him set to come out of the game after approx. 15 pitches, even though his ERA is 0.00 and I can use the decent relief pitching (rest of the RPs ERAs are over 6.00).

hitters, I'm not too worried about, but everyone of my starters show at 100 percent, even right after their start. In the beginning, I would get a number in red (ie 52(100)) showing the pitcher would be at 52 percent the next game, but 100 percent the game after that. Right now, every pitcher is at 100 no matter when they pitched.

I'm getting that too. Maybe somebody should ask the guys at whatif. Either way it isn't going to change how I approach the game. It goes against the spirit of the league/my enjoyment to do otherwise. My #4 and #5 starters are part of the team and I want to see how they'd do in a "realistic" type rotation.

My situation is a little different -- my bullpen is struggling so bad, I'm thinking about dropping one of my bottom two starters in the bullpen, and just going with a 4-man rotation.

I am going with a 4-man rotation...of course, i don't think I have any complete games and typically my pitchers are sitting in the 7th inning, but... whatever... :rotflmao:

If Larry wins this I'll shoot myself.

 

[Koya]

Yeah, I was pimping damn hard in NBA but much less in this draft.  My team is SOOOO great that it needs no pimping.

Good thing I stayed out of the b-ball draft then. My god..

Who won that by the way?

:rotflmao:

Larry do you think Veggie tales are appropriate for a 4 year old? My wife was a little put off with all the talk of death in those tapes.

Veggies are ok.No fruits.

 

[Politician Spock]

If Larry wins this I'll shoot myself.

Don't blame me. I took 2 out of 3 from him.

 

[larry_boy_44]

Did someone turn fatigue off?? All of my guys have been showing 100 percent after every game, including pitchers.

WIS FAQ covers this question. Basically, it's not unusual for players to show some fatigue early in the season after high-scoring games, and then for that fatigue to more or less go away as time goes on.All my batters pretty much stay at 100% except for Trammell, who dips into the mid-90s pretty often (he has the fewest AB of any of my starters except my Cs).Dan Plesac, who pitched only 62 innings in his third salary year, can hardly be used in back-to-back games though he was a closer in real life. He drops down into the 40s after 20 pitches or so. I now have him set to come out of the game after approx. 15 pitches, even though his ERA is 0.00 and I can use the decent relief pitching (rest of the RPs ERAs are over 6.00).

hitters, I'm not too worried about, but everyone of my starters show at 100 percent, even right after their start. In the beginning, I would get a number in red (ie 52(100)) showing the pitcher would be at 52 percent the next game, but 100 percent the game after that. Right now, every pitcher is at 100 no matter when they pitched.

I'm getting that too. Maybe somebody should ask the guys at whatif. Either way it isn't going to change how I approach the game. It goes against the spirit of the league/my enjoyment to do otherwise. My #4 and #5 starters are part of the team and I want to see how they'd do in a "realistic" type rotation.

My situation is a little different -- my bullpen is struggling so bad, I'm thinking about dropping one of my bottom two starters in the bullpen, and just going with a 4-man rotation.

I am going with a 4-man rotation...of course, i don't think I have any complete games and typically my pitchers are sitting in the 7th inning, but... whatever... :rotflmao:

If Larry wins this I'll shoot myself.

when I win...do you want us to quote you on this or ignore it???'cuz if you want I will quote you on it after I win...

 

[Notorious T.R.E.]

Tony Mullane 4.33 19 23 23 11 1 2 141 21.60 "Ouch."Am I the only guy not to play a dummy team yet?

I'm still waiting to play one.

If you count the Leftovers as a dummy, I've played 8 games in a row against dummy teams. (last two were the leftovers) Which says a lot about my 9 game winning streak. I have a feeling Newmies Rheumies are going to come crashing down in the standings sometime soon.

 

[larry_boy_44]

Yeah, I was pimping damn hard in NBA but much less in this draft.  My team is SOOOO great that it needs no pimping.

Good thing I stayed out of the b-ball draft then. My god..

Who won that by the way?

:rotflmao:

Larry do you think Veggie tales are appropriate for a 4 year old? My wife was a little put off with all the talk of death in those tapes.

I've seen all but a few and don't remember much, if any, talk of dying...they even change some of the more serious stuff to silly stuff (like throwing milkshakes over the walls of Jericho at the Israelites, exile to the isle of tickling (or something like that) instead of killing the Jews in Esther, etc...)but... I dunno... they're all Bible stories, so I guess if they are ok or not depends largely on if you are a Christian or not... if you are, the kids will probably have already heard any story with death involved that is on Veggietales... if you aren't, then they probably haven't...

 

[Politician Spock]

Did someone turn fatigue off?? All of my guys have been showing 100 percent after every game, including pitchers.

WIS FAQ covers this question. Basically, it's not unusual for players to show some fatigue early in the season after high-scoring games, and then for that fatigue to more or less go away as time goes on.All my batters pretty much stay at 100% except for Trammell, who dips into the mid-90s pretty often (he has the fewest AB of any of my starters except my Cs).Dan Plesac, who pitched only 62 innings in his third salary year, can hardly be used in back-to-back games though he was a closer in real life. He drops down into the 40s after 20 pitches or so. I now have him set to come out of the game after approx. 15 pitches, even though his ERA is 0.00 and I can use the decent relief pitching (rest of the RPs ERAs are over 6.00).

hitters, I'm not too worried about, but everyone of my starters show at 100 percent, even right after their start. In the beginning, I would get a number in red (ie 52(100)) showing the pitcher would be at 52 percent the next game, but 100 percent the game after that. Right now, every pitcher is at 100 no matter when they pitched.

I'm getting that too. Maybe somebody should ask the guys at whatif. Either way it isn't going to change how I approach the game. It goes against the spirit of the league/my enjoyment to do otherwise. My #4 and #5 starters are part of the team and I want to see how they'd do in a "realistic" type rotation.

My situation is a little different -- my bullpen is struggling so bad, I'm thinking about dropping one of my bottom two starters in the bullpen, and just going with a 4-man rotation.

I am going with a 4-man rotation...of course, i don't think I have any complete games and typically my pitchers are sitting in the 7th inning, but... whatever... :rotflmao:

If Larry wins this I'll shoot myself.

when I win...do you want us to quote you on this or ignore it???'cuz if you want I will quote you on it after I win...

UCONN owns a nice collection of Nerf guns, so I think he was serious.

 

[UCONN]

Did someone turn fatigue off?? All of my guys have been showing 100 percent after every game, including pitchers.

WIS FAQ covers this question. Basically, it's not unusual for players to show some fatigue early in the season after high-scoring games, and then for that fatigue to more or less go away as time goes on.All my batters pretty much stay at 100% except for Trammell, who dips into the mid-90s pretty often (he has the fewest AB of any of my starters except my Cs).Dan Plesac, who pitched only 62 innings in his third salary year, can hardly be used in back-to-back games though he was a closer in real life. He drops down into the 40s after 20 pitches or so. I now have him set to come out of the game after approx. 15 pitches, even though his ERA is 0.00 and I can use the decent relief pitching (rest of the RPs ERAs are over 6.00).

hitters, I'm not too worried about, but everyone of my starters show at 100 percent, even right after their start. In the beginning, I would get a number in red (ie 52(100)) showing the pitcher would be at 52 percent the next game, but 100 percent the game after that. Right now, every pitcher is at 100 no matter when they pitched.

I'm getting that too. Maybe somebody should ask the guys at whatif. Either way it isn't going to change how I approach the game. It goes against the spirit of the league/my enjoyment to do otherwise. My #4 and #5 starters are part of the team and I want to see how they'd do in a "realistic" type rotation.

My situation is a little different -- my bullpen is struggling so bad, I'm thinking about dropping one of my bottom two starters in the bullpen, and just going with a 4-man rotation.

I am going with a 4-man rotation...of course, i don't think I have any complete games and typically my pitchers are sitting in the 7th inning, but... whatever... :rotflmao:

If Larry wins this I'll shoot myself.

when I win...do you want us to quote you on this or ignore it???'cuz if you want I will quote you on it after I win...

UCONN owns a nice collection of Nerf guns, so I think he was serious.

Spock's smart....LB believes in dragons.

 

[lastresort66]

Some serious bull#### just went down.

In a game against the Baltimore Badgers, I lost 1-0 thanks to John Wetteland spoiling Sam McDowell's 8 inning, 0 hit, 11 K performance. Now, what's f'ed about this is that I only have Wetteland coming in during save situations. Plus, McDowell was on his way to a no-hitter.

SO WHY IN THE NAME OF ALL THAT IS HOLY DID WETTELAND RELIEVE MCDOWELL IN THE 9TH??!!

 

[Mr. Pickles]

Some serious bull#### just went down.

In a game against the Baltimore Badgers, I lost 1-0 thanks to John Wetteland spoiling Sam McDowell's 8 inning, 0 hit, 11 K performance. Now, what's f'ed about this is that I only have Wetteland coming in during save situations. Plus, McDowell was on his way to a no-hitter.

SO WHY IN THE NAME OF ALL THAT IS HOLY DID WETTELAND COME IN IN THE 9TH??!!

Because he's money?

 

[Politician Spock]

Some serious bull#### just went down.

In a game against the Baltimore Badgers, I lost 1-0 thanks to John Wetteland spoiling Sam McDowell's 8 inning, 0 hit, 11 K performance. Now, what's f'ed about this is that I only have Wetteland coming in during save situations. Plus, McDowell was on his way to a no-hitter.

SO WHY IN THE NAME OF ALL THAT IS HOLY DID WETTELAND RELIEVE MCDOWELL IN THE 9TH??!!

Pitch count limit?

 

[lastresort66]

Some serious bull#### just went down.

In a game against the Baltimore Badgers, I lost 1-0 thanks to John Wetteland spoiling Sam McDowell's 8 inning, 0 hit, 11 K performance. Now, what's f'ed about this is that I only have Wetteland coming in during save situations. Plus, McDowell was on his way to a no-hitter.

SO WHY IN THE NAME OF ALL THAT IS HOLY DID WETTELAND COME IN IN THE 9TH??!!

Because he's money?

Any manager with a rock for a brain would realize that McDowell can easily go the distance and was in the process of a no-no. At least let the dude finish it out.And despite the fact that he is usually money, he's only supposed to come in during save situations. Last time I checked, 0-0 was not a save situation.

 

[lastresort66]

Sam McDowell 8.00 0 0 0 7 11 0 119 3.43

I've pitched him in sims with about 130 pitches. He did fine after the 120 mark.*shakes fist* DAMN YOU JOHN MARTINEZ!!! DAMN YOU!!!

 

[Funkley]

Sam McDowell 8.00 0 0 0 7 11 0 119 3.43

I've pitched him in sims with about 130 pitches. He did fine after the 120 mark.*shakes fist* DAMN YOU JOHN MARTINEZ!!! DAMN YOU!!!

Protest.

 

[UCONN]

Sam McDowell 8.00 0 0 0 7 11 0 119 3.43

I've pitched him in sims with about 130 pitches. He did fine after the 120 mark.*shakes fist* DAMN YOU JOHN MARTINEZ!!! DAMN YOU!!!

Protest.

:rotflmao:edited to add chuckled at the Damn you John Martinez line...it was good, but then got to this and the combination of re-reading it and then seeing that made me laugh out loud.

 

[Mr. Pickles]

Some serious bull#### just went down.

In a game against the Baltimore Badgers, I lost 1-0 thanks to John Wetteland spoiling Sam McDowell's 8 inning, 0 hit, 11 K performance. Now, what's f'ed about this is that I only have Wetteland coming in during save situations. Plus, McDowell was on his way to a no-hitter.

SO WHY IN THE NAME OF ALL THAT IS HOLY DID WETTELAND RELIEVE MCDOWELL IN THE 9TH??!!

Because McDowell couldn't sack up?

 

[larry_boy_44]

Did someone turn fatigue off?? All of my guys have been showing 100 percent after every game, including pitchers.

WIS FAQ covers this question. Basically, it's not unusual for players to show some fatigue early in the season after high-scoring games, and then for that fatigue to more or less go away as time goes on.All my batters pretty much stay at 100% except for Trammell, who dips into the mid-90s pretty often (he has the fewest AB of any of my starters except my Cs).Dan Plesac, who pitched only 62 innings in his third salary year, can hardly be used in back-to-back games though he was a closer in real life. He drops down into the 40s after 20 pitches or so. I now have him set to come out of the game after approx. 15 pitches, even though his ERA is 0.00 and I can use the decent relief pitching (rest of the RPs ERAs are over 6.00).

hitters, I'm not too worried about, but everyone of my starters show at 100 percent, even right after their start. In the beginning, I would get a number in red (ie 52(100)) showing the pitcher would be at 52 percent the next game, but 100 percent the game after that. Right now, every pitcher is at 100 no matter when they pitched.

I'm getting that too. Maybe somebody should ask the guys at whatif. Either way it isn't going to change how I approach the game. It goes against the spirit of the league/my enjoyment to do otherwise. My #4 and #5 starters are part of the team and I want to see how they'd do in a "realistic" type rotation.

My situation is a little different -- my bullpen is struggling so bad, I'm thinking about dropping one of my bottom two starters in the bullpen, and just going with a 4-man rotation.

I am going with a 4-man rotation...of course, i don't think I have any complete games and typically my pitchers are sitting in the 7th inning, but... whatever... :rotflmao:

If Larry wins this I'll shoot myself.

when I win...do you want us to quote you on this or ignore it???'cuz if you want I will quote you on it after I win...

UCONN owns a nice collection of Nerf guns, so I think he was serious.

Spock's smart....LB believes in dragons.

:rotflmao: and all you can say to me is "Larry believes in dragons" 'cuz you know that everything else I said is right...besides which, I never said I believe in dragons as in what the stories describe, I said that SOMETHING had to have been there for real for the stories to be so similar and so farspread...I honestly feel that htere is no way that there were no dinosaurs/large lizards living while man is... whether there arne't many of them or they really aren't that incredibly large or are extinct now isn't the point...The point is that 500 years ago there WERE large lizard-like creatures scattered around the world that many different men in many different time periods in many different places saw and claimed to have seen...The only logical explanation from all of these similar accounts (when most of them weren't seen by others) is that there were, in fact, some type of large lizard-like creatures living in those places...

 

[Mr. Pickles]

Some serious bull#### just went down.

In a game against the Baltimore Badgers, I lost 1-0 thanks to John Wetteland spoiling Sam McDowell's 8 inning, 0 hit, 11 K performance. Now, what's f'ed about this is that I only have Wetteland coming in during save situations. Plus, McDowell was on his way to a no-hitter.

SO WHY IN THE NAME OF ALL THAT IS HOLY DID WETTELAND RELIEVE MCDOWELL IN THE 9TH??!!

Glitch in the matrix?

 

[Capella]

I think I'm going to pitch Randy Johnson every other game now.

 

[Mr. Pickles]

The only logical explanation from all of these similar accounts (when most of them weren't seen by others) is that there were, in fact, some type of large lizard-like creatures living in those places...

Okay, I'll bite..WHY?

 

[UCONN]

besides which, I never said I believe in dragons as in what the stories describe, I said that SOMETHING had to have been there for real for the stories to be so similar and so farspread...I honestly feel that htere is no way that there were no dinosaurs/large lizards living while man is... whether there arne't many of them or they really aren't that incredibly large or are extinct now isn't the point...The point is that 500 years ago there WERE large lizard-like creatures scattered around the world that many different men in many different time periods in many different places saw and claimed to have seen...The only logical explanation from all of these similar accounts (when most of them weren't seen by others) is that there were, in fact, some type of large lizard-like creatures living in those places...

:jackpot:

 

[Funkley]

Did someone turn fatigue off?? All of my guys have been showing 100 percent after every game, including pitchers.

WIS FAQ covers this question. Basically, it's not unusual for players to show some fatigue early in the season after high-scoring games, and then for that fatigue to more or less go away as time goes on.All my batters pretty much stay at 100% except for Trammell, who dips into the mid-90s pretty often (he has the fewest AB of any of my starters except my Cs).Dan Plesac, who pitched only 62 innings in his third salary year, can hardly be used in back-to-back games though he was a closer in real life. He drops down into the 40s after 20 pitches or so. I now have him set to come out of the game after approx. 15 pitches, even though his ERA is 0.00 and I can use the decent relief pitching (rest of the RPs ERAs are over 6.00).

hitters, I'm not too worried about, but everyone of my starters show at 100 percent, even right after their start. In the beginning, I would get a number in red (ie 52(100)) showing the pitcher would be at 52 percent the next game, but 100 percent the game after that. Right now, every pitcher is at 100 no matter when they pitched.

I'm getting that too. Maybe somebody should ask the guys at whatif. Either way it isn't going to change how I approach the game. It goes against the spirit of the league/my enjoyment to do otherwise. My #4 and #5 starters are part of the team and I want to see how they'd do in a "realistic" type rotation.

My situation is a little different -- my bullpen is struggling so bad, I'm thinking about dropping one of my bottom two starters in the bullpen, and just going with a 4-man rotation.

I am going with a 4-man rotation...of course, i don't think I have any complete games and typically my pitchers are sitting in the 7th inning, but... whatever... :rotflmao:

If Larry wins this I'll shoot myself.

when I win...do you want us to quote you on this or ignore it???'cuz if you want I will quote you on it after I win...

 

[oso diablo]

Also, my respect for King Kelley is totally un-related to any regards for Nipsey. That guy was great pure and simple.

sorry, UCONN. He woulda been on your team, if i had done better research, and known he qualified as a catcher.

 

[Capella]

Some serious bull#### just went down.

In a game against the Baltimore Badgers, I lost 1-0 thanks to John Wetteland spoiling Sam McDowell's 8 inning, 0 hit, 11 K performance. Now, what's f'ed about this is that I only have Wetteland coming in during save situations. Plus, McDowell was on his way to a no-hitter.

SO WHY IN THE NAME OF ALL THAT IS HOLY DID WETTELAND RELIEVE MCDOWELL IN THE 9TH??!!

Because John Martinez says so?

 

[lastresort66]

Sam McDowell 8.00 0 0 0 7 11 0 119 3.43

I've pitched him in sims with about 130 pitches. He did fine after the 120 mark.*shakes fist* DAMN YOU JOHN MARTINEZ!!! DAMN YOU!!!

Protest.

:rotflmao:edited to add chuckled at the Damn you John Martinez line...it was good, but then got to this and the combination of re-reading it and then seeing that made me laugh out loud.

Done.

 

[Politician Spock]

Did someone turn fatigue off?? All of my guys have been showing 100 percent after every game, including pitchers.

WIS FAQ covers this question. Basically, it's not unusual for players to show some fatigue early in the season after high-scoring games, and then for that fatigue to more or less go away as time goes on.

All my batters pretty much stay at 100% except for Trammell, who dips into the mid-90s pretty often (he has the fewest AB of any of my starters except my Cs).

Dan Plesac, who pitched only 62 innings in his third salary year, can hardly be used in back-to-back games though he was a closer in real life. He drops down into the 40s after 20 pitches or so. I now have him set to come out of the game after approx. 15 pitches, even though his ERA is 0.00 and I can use the decent relief pitching (rest of the RPs ERAs are over 6.00).

hitters, I'm not too worried about, but everyone of my starters show at 100 percent, even right after their start. In the beginning, I would get a number in red (ie 52(100)) showing the pitcher would be at 52 percent the next game, but 100 percent the game after that. Right now, every pitcher is at 100 no matter when they pitched.

I'm getting that too. Maybe somebody should ask the guys at whatif. Either way it isn't going to change how I approach the game. It goes against the spirit of the league/my enjoyment to do otherwise. My #4 and #5 starters are part of the team and I want to see how they'd do in a "realistic" type rotation.

My situation is a little different -- my bullpen is struggling so bad, I'm thinking about dropping one of my bottom two starters in the bullpen, and just going with a 4-man rotation.

I am going with a 4-man rotation...

of course, i don't think I have any complete games and typically my pitchers are sitting in the 7th inning, but... whatever...

:rotflmao:

If Larry wins this I'll shoot myself.

when I win...

do you want us to quote you on this or ignore it???

'cuz if you want I will quote you on it after I win...

UCONN owns a nice collection of Nerf guns, so I think he was serious.

Spock's smart....LB believes in dragons.

:rotflmao:

and all you can say to me is "Larry believes in dragons" 'cuz you know that everything else I said is right...

besides which, I never said I believe in dragons as in what the stories describe, I said that SOMETHING had to have been there for real for the stories to be so similar and so farspread...

I honestly feel that htere is no way that there were no dinosaurs/large lizards living while man is... whether there arne't many of them or they really aren't that incredibly large or are extinct now isn't the point...

The point is that 500 years ago there WERE large lizard-like creatures scattered around the world that many different men in many different time periods in many different places saw and claimed to have seen...

The only logical explanation from all of these similar accounts (when most of them weren't seen by others) is that there were, in fact, some type of large lizard-like creatures living in those places...

That's pretty uncool of you to ruin a perfectly good 323 page thread like that!

 

[UCONN]

Also, my respect for King Kelley is totally un-related to any regards for Nipsey.  That guy was great pure and simple.

sorry, UCONN. He woulda been on your team, if i had done better research, and known he qualified as a catcher.

You did great Oso. Bench has been very solid. Tettleton's already won me a game and has the added bonus of being able to fill in, in the outfield in a pinch.edited to add I'm trolling...clear the water when I make remarks like that.

 

[Capella]

Did someone turn fatigue off?? All of my guys have been showing 100 percent after every game, including pitchers.

WIS FAQ covers this question. Basically, it's not unusual for players to show some fatigue early in the season after high-scoring games, and then for that fatigue to more or less go away as time goes on.

All my batters pretty much stay at 100% except for Trammell, who dips into the mid-90s pretty often (he has the fewest AB of any of my starters except my Cs).

Dan Plesac, who pitched only 62 innings in his third salary year, can hardly be used in back-to-back games though he was a closer in real life. He drops down into the 40s after 20 pitches or so. I now have him set to come out of the game after approx. 15 pitches, even though his ERA is 0.00 and I can use the decent relief pitching (rest of the RPs ERAs are over 6.00).

hitters, I'm not too worried about, but everyone of my starters show at 100 percent, even right after their start. In the beginning, I would get a number in red (ie 52(100)) showing the pitcher would be at 52 percent the next game, but 100 percent the game after that. Right now, every pitcher is at 100 no matter when they pitched.

I'm getting that too. Maybe somebody should ask the guys at whatif. Either way it isn't going to change how I approach the game. It goes against the spirit of the league/my enjoyment to do otherwise. My #4 and #5 starters are part of the team and I want to see how they'd do in a "realistic" type rotation.

My situation is a little different -- my bullpen is struggling so bad, I'm thinking about dropping one of my bottom two starters in the bullpen, and just going with a 4-man rotation.

I am going with a 4-man rotation...

of course, i don't think I have any complete games and typically my pitchers are sitting in the 7th inning, but... whatever...

:rotflmao:

If Larry wins this I'll shoot myself.

when I win...

do you want us to quote you on this or ignore it???

'cuz if you want I will quote you on it after I win...

UCONN owns a nice collection of Nerf guns, so I think he was serious.

Spock's smart....LB believes in dragons.

:rotflmao:

and all you can say to me is "Larry believes in dragons" 'cuz you know that everything else I said is right...

besides which, I never said I believe in dragons as in what the stories describe, I said that SOMETHING had to have been there for real for the stories to be so similar and so farspread...

I honestly feel that htere is no way that there were no dinosaurs/large lizards living while man is... whether there arne't many of them or they really aren't that incredibly large or are extinct now isn't the point...

The point is that 500 years ago there WERE large lizard-like creatures scattered around the world that many different men in many different time periods in many different places saw and claimed to have seen...

The only logical explanation from all of these similar accounts (when most of them weren't seen by others) is that there were, in fact, some type of large lizard-like creatures living in those places...

SWEEEEEEEEEET

Now we can have a dragon thread inside a game of Star Wars Werewolf inside a soon to be 400 page baseball sim.

NOT A DRAGON

 

[Capella]

by the way, whatever happened to nipsey's game of star wars werewolf?

 

[Capella]

bump

 

[Politician Spock]

by the way, whatever happened to nipsey's game of star wars werewolf?

The characters were at a base, and the planet was blown up by the next Death Star.

 

[Capella]

by the way, whatever happened to nipsey's game of star wars werewolf?

The characters were at a base, and the planet was blown up by the next Death Star.

I was Chewbacca..did he live?

 

[UCONN]

SWEEEEEEEEEETNow we can have a dragon thread inside a game of Star Wars Werewolf inside a soon to be 400 page baseball sim.

NOT A DRAGON

Vote Koya.

for knowing how that works...seriously, in the name of all that is Holy do not get involved in a werewolf game.

 

[larry_boy_44]

The only logical explanation from all of these similar accounts (when most of them weren't seen by others) is that there were, in fact, some type of large lizard-like creatures living in those places...

Okay, I'll bite..WHY?

because people in Asia, Europe, Africa, & South/North America ALL saw these things...all the accounts are similar enough to assume that there probably really was something there...

 

[Funkley]

Did someone turn fatigue off?? All of my guys have been showing 100 percent after every game, including pitchers.

WIS FAQ covers this question. Basically, it's not unusual for players to show some fatigue early in the season after high-scoring games, and then for that fatigue to more or less go away as time goes on.

All my batters pretty much stay at 100% except for Trammell, who dips into the mid-90s pretty often (he has the fewest AB of any of my starters except my Cs).

Dan Plesac, who pitched only 62 innings in his third salary year, can hardly be used in back-to-back games though he was a closer in real life. He drops down into the 40s after 20 pitches or so. I now have him set to come out of the game after approx. 15 pitches, even though his ERA is 0.00 and I can use the decent relief pitching (rest of the RPs ERAs are over 6.00).

hitters, I'm not too worried about, but everyone of my starters show at 100 percent, even right after their start. In the beginning, I would get a number in red (ie 52(100)) showing the pitcher would be at 52 percent the next game, but 100 percent the game after that. Right now, every pitcher is at 100 no matter when they pitched.

I'm getting that too. Maybe somebody should ask the guys at whatif. Either way it isn't going to change how I approach the game. It goes against the spirit of the league/my enjoyment to do otherwise. My #4 and #5 starters are part of the team and I want to see how they'd do in a "realistic" type rotation.

My situation is a little different -- my bullpen is struggling so bad, I'm thinking about dropping one of my bottom two starters in the bullpen, and just going with a 4-man rotation.

I am going with a 4-man rotation...

of course, i don't think I have any complete games and typically my pitchers are sitting in the 7th inning, but... whatever...

:rotflmao:

If Larry wins this I'll shoot myself.

when I win...

do you want us to quote you on this or ignore it???

'cuz if you want I will quote you on it after I win...

UCONN owns a nice collection of Nerf guns, so I think he was serious.

Spock's smart....LB believes in dragons.

:rotflmao:

and all you can say to me is "Larry believes in dragons" 'cuz you know that everything else I said is right...

besides which, I never said I believe in dragons as in what the stories describe, I said that SOMETHING had to have been there for real for the stories to be so similar and so farspread...

I honestly feel that htere is no way that there were no dinosaurs/large lizards living while man is... whether there arne't many of them or they really aren't that incredibly large or are extinct now isn't the point...

The point is that 500 years ago there WERE large lizard-like creatures scattered around the world that many different men in many different time periods in many different places saw and claimed to have seen...

The only logical explanation from all of these similar accounts (when most of them weren't seen by others) is that there were, in fact, some type of large lizard-like creatures living in those places...

The Book Of Jeebus Larry and his congregation.

 

[Politician Spock]

by the way, whatever happened to nipsey's game of star wars werewolf?

The characters were at a base, and the planet was blown up by the next Death Star.

I was Chewbacca..did he live?

For about 0.7 seconds longer than Han.

 

[larry_boy_44]

besides which, I never said I believe in dragons as in what the stories describe, I said that SOMETHING had to have been there for real for the stories to be so similar and so farspread...I honestly feel that htere is no way that there were no dinosaurs/large lizards living while man is... whether there arne't many of them or they really aren't that incredibly large or are extinct now isn't the point...The point is that 500 years ago there WERE large lizard-like creatures scattered around the world that many different men in many different time periods in many different places saw and claimed to have seen...The only logical explanation from all of these similar accounts (when most of them weren't seen by others) is that there were, in fact, some type of large lizard-like creatures living in those places...

:jackpot:

hey, I'd rather think that there was something more to the "dragon myths" than just mythology than be Nipsey's #####...besides which... if something was there, and it was a dinosaur, or dinosaur like, what did you want them to call it? "Dinosaur" wasn't a word unitl the mid-1800s...

 

[Funkley]

The only logical explanation from all of these similar accounts (when most of them weren't seen by others) is that there were, in fact, some type of large lizard-like creatures living in those places...

Okay, I'll bite..WHY?

because people in Asia, Europe, Africa, & South/North America ALL saw these things...all the accounts are similar enough to assume that there probably really was something there...

People in all of those countries claim to have seen Bigfoot, UFO's and Elvis.

 

[Capella]

by the way, whatever happened to nipsey's game of star wars werewolf?

The characters were at a base, and the planet was blown up by the next Death Star.

I was Chewbacca..did he live?

For about 0.7 seconds longer than Han.

Han was a ##### anyways.

 

[aaronr28]

do players ever get injured in this simulation?

 

[UCONN]

The only logical explanation from all of these similar accounts (when most of them weren't seen by others) is that there were, in fact, some type of large lizard-like creatures living in those places...

Okay, I'll bite..WHY?

because people in Asia, Europe, Africa, & South/North America ALL saw these things...all the accounts are similar enough to assume that there probably really was something there...

Nipsey and Capella could say they saw me having sex w/ your soon to be submissive Mrs...wait, that example doesn't work so well...

We could all say we saw pigs fly...that wouldn't make it so. It would mean we were telling a story.

 

[Capella]

The only logical explanation from all of these similar accounts (when most of them weren't seen by others) is that there were, in fact, some type of large lizard-like creatures living in those places...

Okay, I'll bite..WHY?

because people in Asia, Europe, Africa, & South/North America ALL saw these things...all the accounts are similar enough to assume that there probably really was something there...

Were there Unicorns there too?

 

[Capella]

do players ever get injured in this simulation?

Tim Teufel down?

 

[aaronr28]

The only logical explanation from all of these similar accounts (when most of them weren't seen by others) is that there were, in fact, some type of large lizard-like creatures living in those places...

Okay, I'll bite..WHY?

because people in Asia, Europe, Africa, & South/North America ALL saw these things...all the accounts are similar enough to assume that there probably really was something there...

People in all of those countries claim to have seen Bigfoot, UFO's and Elvis.

SASQUATCH IS REAL #####ES!BELIEVE IT!!

 

[UCONN]

besides which, I never said I believe in dragons as in what the stories describe, I said that SOMETHING had to have been there for real for the stories to be so similar and so farspread...I honestly feel that htere is no way that there were no dinosaurs/large lizards living while man is... whether there arne't many of them or they really aren't that incredibly large or are extinct now isn't the point...The point is that 500 years ago there WERE large lizard-like creatures scattered around the world that many different men in many different time periods in many different places saw and claimed to have seen...The only logical explanation from all of these similar accounts (when most of them weren't seen by others) is that there were, in fact, some type of large lizard-like creatures living in those places...

:jackpot:

hey, I'd rather think that there was something more to the "dragon myths" than just mythology than be Nipsey's #####...besides which... if something was there, and it was a dinosaur, or dinosaur like, what did you want them to call it? "Dinosaur" wasn't a word unitl the mid-1800s...

:submittomywill:

 

[UCONN]

If we make it out of this thread w/out someone getting some serious time off I'll be very suprised.

 

[larry_boy_44]

The only logical explanation from all of these similar accounts (when most of them weren't seen by others) is that there were, in fact, some type of large lizard-like creatures living in those places...

Okay, I'll bite..WHY?

because people in Asia, Europe, Africa, & South/North America ALL saw these things...all the accounts are similar enough to assume that there probably really was something there...

People in all of those countries claim to have seen Bigfoot, UFO's and Elvis.

yes, and most of the people claiming those things have heard the stories others told...The people in South/North America had never heard of European/Asian dragon stories...

and the dragon stories in Asia and Europe were early enough to assume that they probably hadn't travelled far enough for them to be copied from other accounts, too...

same with some of the stories from Africa...

also, are there stories in Australia? I'm not sure, but if there are, again, far enough away (and out of contact) to assume they had never heard the dragon stories from other cultures...

so, how are all the stories relatively similar if the things never existed?

 

[Funkley]

The only logical explanation from all of these similar accounts (when most of them weren't seen by others) is that there were, in fact, some type of large lizard-like creatures living in those places...

Okay, I'll bite..WHY?

because people in Asia, Europe, Africa, & South/North America ALL saw these things...all the accounts are similar enough to assume that there probably really was something there...

People in all of those countries claim to have seen Bigfoot, UFO's and Elvis.

SASQUATCH IS REAL #####ES!BELIEVE IT!!

Seen him too huh?

 

[Mr. Pickles]

SWEEEEEEEEEET

Now we can have a dragon thread inside a game of Star Wars Werewolf inside a soon to be 400 page baseball sim.

NOT A DRAGON 

Vote Koya.

for knowing how that works...seriously, in the name of all that is Holy do not get involved in a werewolf game.

Can you give a brief outline? Everytime I go in there they seem to be signing up people and randomly voting based on nothing. What am I missing here?

 

[larry_boy_44]

The only logical explanation from all of these similar accounts (when most of them weren't seen by others) is that there were, in fact, some type of large lizard-like creatures living in those places...

Okay, I'll bite..WHY?

because people in Asia, Europe, Africa, & South/North America ALL saw these things...all the accounts are similar enough to assume that there probably really was something there...

Nipsey and Capella could say they saw me having sex w/ your soon to be submissive Mrs...wait, that example doesn't work so well...

We could all say we saw pigs fly...that wouldn't make it so. It would mean we were telling a story.

yes, but we are talking about tons of people over thousands of years who had NEVER met eachother telling INCREDIBLY similar stories...plus there are cave drawings, rock drawings, etc. of things that look almost exactly like dinosaurs that have been extinct for "millions" of years and have no modern look-a-like enough to make the drawings from...