***OFFICIAL*** FFA MLB Draft (1 Viewer)

[UCONN]

Larry, do you know how much porn is on the internet?  You really thought it was your Christian duty to rat on one of 20 or so guys who post in a thread the rest of the FFA could care less about?  What, you think some 8 year old kid was going to access this site and have his religious mind scarred for life cuz he saw some boobies?

and what you thought that just because you had a really long thread that you could post whatever you wanted even though it clearly broke the rules of hte board?what would Joe say about that UCONN??

I don't really care what Joe would say about it. Do you miss your Hall Monitor days or something?

no, I just think your pretty pathetic if you actually get pissed because someone expects you to respect the rules of the board you are posting on...if you don't like it, leave, tis been said before...

#### you. You're a #####. Anybody that trusts you is a fool. Anybody that has any non-required involvement w/ your life is worse off for it. You give everything you try to stand for a bad name and guys like me a great reason to stay the hell away from a church pew.

 

[10993]

On a totally unrelated matter, have you guys ever read Larry's posts at ChristianGuitar.com?

It includes such gems as:

"So God is gonna force us into heaven against our will?...But, seriously, what would God do if He says enter in and the person goes "No, I hate you, sent me to hell"??"

Seriously, read it. It's funny.

 

[Nipsey]

Guys, lets pull back a bit on the Larry lambastation.   It would be a shame to have this thread locked or deleted.

We all know who is in the right and who is in the wrong.  Bad as bending rules are, to purposely use different rules for different players on your own team is damn close to cheating.

Again, that pales in comparison to talking about reporting what is said in here.

That said, lets move on and keep the personal attacks to a minumum.   Obviously, we will not have this issue for our next draft as we will have to be more careful about who takes place, especially if $$ are involved.  Even just 12 bucks.

Respectfully, Koya...get off your high horse. I was reported AND accused of posting porn here (not true!) by someone who's blantanty cheating and refuses to acknowledge that fact. You handle things the way you want to. I'll handle them my way. If it gets me in hot water, so be it. I can live with the consequences.

I didn't accuse you, I said I thought it was you but wasn't sure...dude, no biggie if you didn't do it...

would it make you feel better if I go back and edit the posts that I said that in?

It would make me feel better if you left this thread for good and we gave your team away to someone else who won't cheat. That would make me feel better. I'm pretty sure that will happen so you should prepare for that.

 

[10993]

David Zampino

 

[larry_boy_44]

Larry, do you know how much porn is on the internet?  You really thought it was your Christian duty to rat on one of 20 or so guys who post in a thread the rest of the FFA could care less about?  What, you think some 8 year old kid was going to access this site and have his religious mind scarred for life cuz he saw some boobies?

and what you thought that just because you had a really long thread that you could post whatever you wanted even though it clearly broke the rules of hte board?what would Joe say about that UCONN??

I don't really care what Joe would say about it. Do you miss your Hall Monitor days or something?

no, I just think your pretty pathetic if you actually get pissed because someone expects you to respect the rules of the board you are posting on...if you don't like it, leave, tis been said before...

#### you. You're a #####. Anybody that trusts you is a fool. Anybody that has any non-required involvement w/ your life is worse off for it. You give everything you try to stand for a bad name and guys like me a great reason to stay the hell away from a church pew.

why? because you think I broke a rule that was never actually stated?because I think we should actually follow the rules other people put on things that they put up?

because I got out of the third grade when it was cool to break rules because you saw a way that you could break them?

grow up, UCONN...

 

[Giant Wooden Badger]

R.I.P.It was a good run.

 

[Doug B]

you had the choice between Eck's third season and his third reliever season (and, technically, his third best starter season)...

Logically, why would all three be allowed?You really thought it was cool to do whatever just because a guy spent time as both a reliever and a starter? You really needed the word "could" to have been replaced with "must" to have known better?

The only reason no one ever posted "must" is that discussion on this topic occured on the fly. The "could" phrase was part of what was then a proposal. Well, that proposal was later adopted by non-referential assent. Non-referential assent means an "OK, all agreed" from the gallery rather than the specific proposal being repeated back as a rule:

Non-referential assent:

A: Maybe for guys like Eck, we could use either third season as a SP, or third as a RP? That would be fair.

B, C, D, E: OK, that sounds fair, good idea, let's do it.

Referential assent:

A: Maybe for guys like Eck, we could use either third season as a SP, or third as a RP? That would be fair.

B: OK, then, here's the rule: for guys like Eck, one must use either third season as a SP, or third as a RP.

A, C, D, E: We are all in favor of adopting that rule.

...

Now then. For the purposes of this draft, isn't non-referential assent sufficient? Isn't it enough to get a widespread "OK" from the members in discussion (aka a quorum)? Did we really have to consult Robert's Rules of Order every time a question came up?

It's not life or death here -- it's a message-board draft. There was an unspoken assumption early on that as rule ambiguities arose, we could kinda just figure out a fair way to deal with them on the fly with little muss or fuss.

Did Capella really need to write a manifesto on how this draft would be conducted? Did every "i" need to be dotted? Couldn't we count on a sense of fair play and plain old common sense among the participants?

.

 

[Nipsey]

test-i-cles....you really can't say this on the board? and why when it's censored, does it come up ####? We're censoring legitimate body parts on the board now? Scary.

 

[Politician Spock]

I have to bench my first position player due to fatigue, damnit!! Thankfully, its against D,A and L. Maybe I should just bench my entire starting lineup just for grins.

Anyone else having to actually manage playing time yet??

Considering I am switching back and forth between four different lineups, I haven't experienced that problem. I have lineups for LHP and RHP for home games, and LHP and RHP for away games.

 

[UCONN]

Larry, do you know how much porn is on the internet?  You really thought it was your Christian duty to rat on one of 20 or so guys who post in a thread the rest of the FFA could care less about?  What, you think some 8 year old kid was going to access this site and have his religious mind scarred for life cuz he saw some boobies?

and what you thought that just because you had a really long thread that you could post whatever you wanted even though it clearly broke the rules of hte board?what would Joe say about that UCONN??

I don't really care what Joe would say about it. Do you miss your Hall Monitor days or something?

no, I just think your pretty pathetic if you actually get pissed because someone expects you to respect the rules of the board you are posting on...if you don't like it, leave, tis been said before...

#### you. You're a #####. Anybody that trusts you is a fool. Anybody that has any non-required involvement w/ your life is worse off for it. You give everything you try to stand for a bad name and guys like me a great reason to stay the hell away from a church pew.

why? because you think I broke a rule that was never actually stated?because I think we should actually follow the rules other people put on things that they put up?

because I got out of the third grade when it was cool to break rules because you saw a way that you could break them?

grow up, UCONN...

ok. glad to hear Joe passed out the Hall Monitor sashes to the right guys. You're pathetic. Glad you don't go anywhere near the gambling threads. Actually guys like you are why I don't post in there. I'm sure your Christian duty includes informing the IRS who may or may not be reporting their winnings. I honestly couldn't look myself in the mirror, much less claim to have the inside track to paradise, if I lived my life like you.

 

[10993]

you had the choice between Eck's third season and his third reliever season (and, technically, his third best starter season)...

Logically, why would all three be allowed?You really thought it was cool to do whatever just because a guy spent time as both a reliever and a starter? You really needed the word "could" to have been replaced with "must" to have known better?

The only reason no one ever posted "must" is that discussion on this topic occured on the fly. The "could" phrase was part of what was then a proposal. Well, that proposal was later adopted by non-referential assent. Non-referential assent means an "OK, all agreed" from the gallery rather than the specific proposal being repeated back as a rule:

Non-referential assent:

A: Maybe for guys like Eck, we could use either third season as a SP, or third as a RP? That would be fair.

B, C, D, E: OK, that sounds fair, good idea, let's do it.

Referential assent:

A: Maybe for guys like Eck, we could use either third season as a SP, or third as a RP? That would be fair.

B: OK, then, here's the rule: for guys like Eck, one must use either third season as a SP, or third as a RP.

A, C, D, E: We are all in favor of adopting that rule.

...

Now then. For the purposes of this draft, isn't non-referential assent sufficient? Isn't it enough to get a widespread "OK" from the members in discussion (aka a quorum)? Did we really have to consult Robert's Rules of Order every time a question came up?

It's not life or death here -- it's a message-board draft. There was an unspoken assumption early on that as rule ambiguities arose, we could kinda just figure out a fair way to deal with them on the fly with little muss or fuss.

Did Capella really need to write a manifesto on how this draft would be conducted? Did every "i" need to be dotted? Couldn't we count on a sense of fair play and plain old common sense among the participants?

.

LB44 =

 

[Funkley]

you had the choice between Eck's third season and his third reliever season (and, technically, his third best starter season)...

Logically, why would all three be allowed?You really thought it was cool to do whatever just because a guy spent time as both a reliever and a starter? You really needed the word "could" to have been replaced with "must" to have known better?

The only reason no one ever posted "must" is that discussion on this topic occured on the fly. The "could" phrase was part of what was then a proposal. Well, that proposal was later adopted by non-referential assent. Non-referential assent means an "OK, all agreed" from the gallery rather than the specific proposal being repeated back as a rule:

Non-referential assent:

A: Maybe for guys like Eck, we could use either third season as a SP, or third as a RP? That would be fair.

B, C, D, E: OK, that sounds fair, good idea, let's do it.

Referential assent:

A: Maybe for guys like Eck, we could use either third season as a SP, or third as a RP? That would be fair.

B: OK, then, here's the rule: for guys like Eck, one must use either third season as a SP, or third as a RP.

A, C, D, E: We are all in favor of adopting that rule.

...

Now then. For the purposes of this draft, isn't non-referential assent sufficient? Isn't it enough to get a widespread "OK" from the members in discussion (aka a quorum)? Did we really have to consult Robert's Rules of Order every time a question came up?

It's not life or death here -- it's a message-board draft. There was an unspoken assumption early on that as rule ambiguities arose, we could kinda just figure out a fair way to deal with them on the fly with little muss or fuss.

Did Capella really need to write a manifesto on how this draft would be conducted? Did every "i" need to be dotted? Couldn't we count on a sense of fair play and plain old common sense among the participants?

.

Excellent posting.

 

[larry_boy_44]

Guys, lets pull back a bit on the Larry lambastation.   It would be a shame to have this thread locked or deleted.

We all know who is in the right and who is in the wrong.  Bad as bending rules are, to purposely use different rules for different players on your own team is damn close to cheating.

Again, that pales in comparison to talking about reporting what is said in here.

That said, lets move on and keep the personal attacks to a minumum.   Obviously, we will not have this issue for our next draft as we will have to be more careful about who takes place, especially if $$ are involved.  Even just 12 bucks.

Respectfully, Koya...get off your high horse. I was reported AND accused of posting porn here (not true!) by someone who's blantanty cheating and refuses to acknowledge that fact. You handle things the way you want to. I'll handle them my way. If it gets me in hot water, so be it. I can live with the consequences.

I didn't accuse you, I said I thought it was you but wasn't sure...dude, no biggie if you didn't do it...

would it make you feel better if I go back and edit the posts that I said that in?

It would make me feel better if you left this thread for good and we gave your team away to someone else who won't cheat. That would make me feel better. I'm pretty sure that will happen so you should prepare for that.

how's this, all teams answer this, if everyone says that I was wrong, I'll change him...Was it ever stated that you MUST use the third best reliever season of a player if his third best season falls on that of a reliever?

also, why are only Quantrill's reliever seasons counted on this?

how's this:

Harriers use of Slim Sallee is also illigal, look:

relief years:

1. Sallee, Slim 1916 St. Louis Cardinals L 194 2.18 14-9 1 1.12 .239 1.63 3.12 0.20 $6,289,570

2. Sallee, Slim 1916 New York Giants L 194 2.18 14-9 1 1.12 .239 1.63 3.12 0.20 $6,289,570

3. Sallee, Slim 1916 New York Giants L 119 1.37 9-4 0 0.95 .223 0.81 2.82 0.16 $4,393,669

4. Sallee, Slim 1920 New York Giants L 141 3.11 6-6 2 1.21 .267 1.08 1.02 0.27 $3,950,055

5. Sallee, Slim 1920 Cincinnati Reds L 141 3.11 6-6 2 1.21 .267 1.08 1.02 0.27 $3,950,055

6. Sallee, Slim 1908 St. Louis Cardinals L 135 3.16 3-8 0 1.40 .272 2.53 2.74 0.07 $3,331,088

he is using a year from 1916, the first three entries here are 1916...that's cheating...

what I did was, at WORST, misunderstanding a rule...

 

[larry_boy_44]

you had the choice between Eck's third season and his third reliever season (and, technically, his third best starter season)...

Logically, why would all three be allowed?You really thought it was cool to do whatever just because a guy spent time as both a reliever and a starter? You really needed the word "could" to have been replaced with "must" to have known better?

The only reason no one ever posted "must" is that discussion on this topic occured on the fly. The "could" phrase was part of what was then a proposal. Well, that proposal was later adopted by non-referential assent. Non-referential assent means an "OK, all agreed" from the gallery rather than the specific proposal being repeated back as a rule:

Non-referential assent:

A: Maybe for guys like Eck, we could use either third season as a SP, or third as a RP? That would be fair.

B, C, D, E: OK, that sounds fair, good idea, let's do it.

Referential assent:

A: Maybe for guys like Eck, we could use either third season as a SP, or third as a RP? That would be fair.

B: OK, then, here's the rule: for guys like Eck, one must use either third season as a SP, or third as a RP.

A, C, D, E: We are all in favor of adopting that rule.

...

Now then. For the purposes of this draft, isn't non-referential assent sufficient? Isn't it enough to get a widespread "OK" from the members in discussion (aka a quorum)? Did we really have to consult Robert's Rules of Order every time a question came up?

It's not life or death here -- it's a message-board draft. There was an unspoken assumption early on that as rule ambiguities arose, we could kinda just figure out a fair way to deal with them on the fly with little muss or fuss.

Did Capella really need to write a manifesto on how this draft would be conducted? Did every "i" need to be dotted? Couldn't we count on a sense of fair play and plain old common sense among the participants?

.

if we are gonna say that someone is cheating, yes...besides, I asked straight out "could I use the third best reliever season if I wanted to?" and the answer was "yes", there was no "YOU HAVE TO!!" or anything like that...

 

[larry_boy_44]

Larry, do you know how much porn is on the internet?  You really thought it was your Christian duty to rat on one of 20 or so guys who post in a thread the rest of the FFA could care less about?  What, you think some 8 year old kid was going to access this site and have his religious mind scarred for life cuz he saw some boobies?

and what you thought that just because you had a really long thread that you could post whatever you wanted even though it clearly broke the rules of hte board?what would Joe say about that UCONN??

I don't really care what Joe would say about it. Do you miss your Hall Monitor days or something?

no, I just think your pretty pathetic if you actually get pissed because someone expects you to respect the rules of the board you are posting on...if you don't like it, leave, tis been said before...

#### you. You're a #####. Anybody that trusts you is a fool. Anybody that has any non-required involvement w/ your life is worse off for it. You give everything you try to stand for a bad name and guys like me a great reason to stay the hell away from a church pew.

why? because you think I broke a rule that was never actually stated?because I think we should actually follow the rules other people put on things that they put up?

because I got out of the third grade when it was cool to break rules because you saw a way that you could break them?

grow up, UCONN...

ok. glad to hear Joe passed out the Hall Monitor sashes to the right guys. You're pathetic. Glad you don't go anywhere near the gambling threads. Actually guys like you are why I don't post in there. I'm sure your Christian duty includes informing the IRS who may or may not be reporting their winnings. I honestly couldn't look myself in the mirror, much less claim to have the inside track to paradise, if I lived my life like you.

1. there is nothing in the gambling threads breaking the board rules (as far as I know)...second, how childish and hypocritical is it to be mad at me for "cheating" in this when you are saying its ok to cheat other places (like cheating the IRS for example...)

 

[The foo]

This thread is amazing and disturbing at the same time. Amazing the amount of frustration, pain and pretty much hatred 1 person can cause. Disturbing because i get the feeling the person causing all the problems of what was suppose to be a fun, new and different thing for everyone involved seems so detatched from the situation emotionally. I get the feeling larry boy is not the least bit angry/upset or even feels the least bit bad over this.I am reminded of a saying from silence of the lambs where when they described a gruesome killing by Hannible Lechter noting that his heart rate never went above 85. (or something like that):Bllack dot: err :Lthing:

 

[10993]

Guys, lets pull back a bit on the Larry lambastation. It would be a shame to have this thread locked or deleted.

We all know who is in the right and who is in the wrong. Bad as bending rules are, to purposely use different rules for different players on your own team is damn close to cheating.

Again, that pales in comparison to talking about reporting what is said in here.

That said, lets move on and keep the personal attacks to a minumum. Obviously, we will not have this issue for our next draft as we will have to be more careful about who takes place, especially if $$ are involved. Even just 12 bucks.

Respectfully, Koya...get off your high horse. I was reported AND accused of posting porn here (not true!) by someone who's blantanty cheating and refuses to acknowledge that fact. You handle things the way you want to. I'll handle them my way. If it gets me in hot water, so be it. I can live with the consequences.

I didn't accuse you, I said I thought it was you but wasn't sure...dude, no biggie if you didn't do it...

would it make you feel better if I go back and edit the posts that I said that in?

It would make me feel better if you left this thread for good and we gave your team away to someone else who won't cheat. That would make me feel better. I'm pretty sure that will happen so you should prepare for that.

how's this, all teams answer this, if everyone says that I was wrong, I'll change him...Was it ever stated that you MUST use the third best reliever season of a player if his third best season falls on that of a reliever?

also, why are only Quantrill's reliever seasons counted on this?

how's this:

Harriers use of Slim Sallee is also illigal, look:

relief years:

1. Sallee, Slim 1916 St. Louis Cardinals L 194 2.18 14-9 1 1.12 .239 1.63 3.12 0.20 $6,289,570

2. Sallee, Slim 1916 New York Giants L 194 2.18 14-9 1 1.12 .239 1.63 3.12 0.20 $6,289,570

3. Sallee, Slim 1916 New York Giants L 119 1.37 9-4 0 0.95 .223 0.81 2.82 0.16 $4,393,669

4. Sallee, Slim 1920 New York Giants L 141 3.11 6-6 2 1.21 .267 1.08 1.02 0.27 $3,950,055

5. Sallee, Slim 1920 Cincinnati Reds L 141 3.11 6-6 2 1.21 .267 1.08 1.02 0.27 $3,950,055

6. Sallee, Slim 1908 St. Louis Cardinals L 135 3.16 3-8 0 1.40 .272 2.53 2.74 0.07 $3,331,088

he is using a year from 1916, the first three entries here are 1916...that's cheating...

what I did was, at WORST, misunderstanding a rule...

That's not cheating, that's me clicking on the third thing on the list without paying a whole lot of attention to it. That's a mistake anyway, because I wanted his #3 season as a starter, not as a RP--but the whatif restrictions prevented me from using it because there are a limited # of SP/RP slots available. I'll gladly take his 1913 season if whatif will make the change for me.

 

[Politician Spock]

Dude, Quantrill is one of the main reasons LB has had so much success. most of us are losing games late.  Larry hasn't lost late at all.  Quantrill has been unhittible. 

I think your mis-reading what we're saying. I agree that the Quantrill thing is a bit sketchy to say the least, it's just that Quantrill isn't the sole reason he's doing so well. He's certainly part of the reason, but not the whole reason. I know what your saying though, my bullpen has cost me at least 7 games.

If we do this again, we need to rethink how we do RP. It's too important to these games to be as half-assed as we did it. Maybe we need just one closer and then fill in the rest of your roster, but it does need to be reworked.

How am I missing the point? I'm not saying Quantrill's won every game for him, but when you have a guy coming out of the bullpen that's virtually unhittable...damn, that helps! Like I said, my bullpen has cost me 6-8 games. How many games would Larry have lost if he had, say....ECK COMING OUT OF THE BULLPEN?!!?? So I should be punished because I drafted a hall-of-fame closer in Dennis Eckersly and I have to watch Paul ####### Quantrill shut teams down when he comes in? I would KILL to have Quantrill at the season LB is playing him at. This entire thing stinks. Thanks for ruining our league LB. What a man you are.

Nipsey I agree, that Quantrill's greatness has saved him close to 5 games. It's just that it still doesn't explain all his success.

Five wins in 30 starts is A LOT of wins. That's the difference between winning the division and coming in third.

Except he's 8 games ahead of everyone in games played against "real teams". so while Quantrill may be important, it would only drop him back to even with the top teams, which I think we can all agree he shouldn't be.

and that is the entire point of this whole thing...You all don't want me to win and you can't admit that I was 100% in the rules to do so, so you found a way to claim I cheated...

Not all!:loopholefisher:

 

[UCONN]

Larry, do you know how much porn is on the internet?  You really thought it was your Christian duty to rat on one of 20 or so guys who post in a thread the rest of the FFA could care less about?  What, you think some 8 year old kid was going to access this site and have his religious mind scarred for life cuz he saw some boobies?

and what you thought that just because you had a really long thread that you could post whatever you wanted even though it clearly broke the rules of hte board?what would Joe say about that UCONN??

I don't really care what Joe would say about it. Do you miss your Hall Monitor days or something?

no, I just think your pretty pathetic if you actually get pissed because someone expects you to respect the rules of the board you are posting on...if you don't like it, leave, tis been said before...

#### you. You're a #####. Anybody that trusts you is a fool. Anybody that has any non-required involvement w/ your life is worse off for it. You give everything you try to stand for a bad name and guys like me a great reason to stay the hell away from a church pew.

why? because you think I broke a rule that was never actually stated?because I think we should actually follow the rules other people put on things that they put up?

because I got out of the third grade when it was cool to break rules because you saw a way that you could break them?

grow up, UCONN...

ok. glad to hear Joe passed out the Hall Monitor sashes to the right guys. You're pathetic. Glad you don't go anywhere near the gambling threads. Actually guys like you are why I don't post in there. I'm sure your Christian duty includes informing the IRS who may or may not be reporting their winnings. I honestly couldn't look myself in the mirror, much less claim to have the inside track to paradise, if I lived my life like you.

1. there is nothing in the gambling threads breaking the board rules (as far as I know)...second, how childish and hypocritical is it to be mad at me for "cheating" in this when you are saying its ok to cheat other places (like cheating the IRS for example...)

larry, you aren't that smart. that's ok. you should just learn to accept this. you reporting someone in the FFA Baseball Draft community of posting some pic of a girl's boobies is just as bad as reporting someone from the FBG community to the IRS for Grambling and not telling Uncle about it. How you missed that analogy I don't know. I personally don't really give a damn if you cheated. It's wrong...and kind of funny coming from Mr. God Boy himself, but oh well. To report someone like that shows your true character, and yes I'm sure Joe would be on your side and say "that's a good boy Larry, thanks for helping me out" but everybody else knows it just makes you a ##### and a POS that can't be trusted and is worthless as a human contact.

 

[10993]

Guys, lets pull back a bit on the Larry lambastation. It would be a shame to have this thread locked or deleted.

We all know who is in the right and who is in the wrong. Bad as bending rules are, to purposely use different rules for different players on your own team is damn close to cheating.

Again, that pales in comparison to talking about reporting what is said in here.

That said, lets move on and keep the personal attacks to a minumum. Obviously, we will not have this issue for our next draft as we will have to be more careful about who takes place, especially if $$ are involved. Even just 12 bucks.

Respectfully, Koya...get off your high horse. I was reported AND accused of posting porn here (not true!) by someone who's blantanty cheating and refuses to acknowledge that fact. You handle things the way you want to. I'll handle them my way. If it gets me in hot water, so be it. I can live with the consequences.

I didn't accuse you, I said I thought it was you but wasn't sure...dude, no biggie if you didn't do it...

would it make you feel better if I go back and edit the posts that I said that in?

It would make me feel better if you left this thread for good and we gave your team away to someone else who won't cheat. That would make me feel better. I'm pretty sure that will happen so you should prepare for that.

how's this, all teams answer this, if everyone says that I was wrong, I'll change him...Was it ever stated that you MUST use the third best reliever season of a player if his third best season falls on that of a reliever?

also, why are only Quantrill's reliever seasons counted on this?

how's this:

Harriers use of Slim Sallee is also illigal, look:

relief years:

1. Sallee, Slim 1916 St. Louis Cardinals L 194 2.18 14-9 1 1.12 .239 1.63 3.12 0.20 $6,289,570

2. Sallee, Slim 1916 New York Giants L 194 2.18 14-9 1 1.12 .239 1.63 3.12 0.20 $6,289,570

3. Sallee, Slim 1916 New York Giants L 119 1.37 9-4 0 0.95 .223 0.81 2.82 0.16 $4,393,669

4. Sallee, Slim 1920 New York Giants L 141 3.11 6-6 2 1.21 .267 1.08 1.02 0.27 $3,950,055

5. Sallee, Slim 1920 Cincinnati Reds L 141 3.11 6-6 2 1.21 .267 1.08 1.02 0.27 $3,950,055

6. Sallee, Slim 1908 St. Louis Cardinals L 135 3.16 3-8 0 1.40 .272 2.53 2.74 0.07 $3,331,088

he is using a year from 1916, the first three entries here are 1916...that's cheating...

what I did was, at WORST, misunderstanding a rule...

That's not cheating, that's me clicking on the third thing on the list without paying a whole lot of attention to it. That's a mistake anyway, because I wanted his #3 season as a starter, not as a RP--but the whatif restrictions prevented me from using it because there are a limited # of SP/RP slots available. I'll gladly take his 1913 season if whatif will make the change for me.

Thanks for pointing that out, Larry--Sallee and his 4.05 ERA have been dragging my staff down. Support ticket has been sent in.

 

[Koya]

Another. Let's just play w/o him next time and be done with it.

Agree with Funkley and Spock's takes about larry_boy's use of Quantrill.That said, I also agree with Sammy -- there's no durned way that Quantrill is responsible for LB's team's record to date ... and what goes up must come down. How much difference could Quantrill really be making? I know he's statistically good so far, but still.

Dude, Quantrill is one of the main reasons LB has had so much success. most of us are losing games late. Larry hasn't lost late at all. Quantrill has been unhittible. If you really want to continue using the "aw-shucks, I'm not doing anything wrong" defense Larry, I'm fine with it. You're not doing another league with us anyway and most of us recognize the rule dodging you've done in this one. Your result in this league will be tainted. Enjoy winning cheaply.

Now, personally Larry....I DID NOT post porn anywhere in this thread. If you want to post lies about me, you're a bigger **** than I though. I guess it's par for the course, given your history of cheating. If you want to report my posts for calling you a "gay, cheating whore" or a "gay, dirty whore", I guess that's fine too. Should I report the posts you call me somebody's "#####"?

Bottom line is, you're really not a good guy Larry. You sell out your "friends" and do whatever it takes to beat them. You lost a lot of respect last night, from MANY people (if that was possible).

woah there, Nipsey... for one I said I thought it was you... I didn't say it was you...someone did post legit porn in here...

second, I didn't sell out anyone, and I didn't cheat... The only people cheating are the ones deciding to change the rules now without everyone's approval....

half the people in the league haven't said anything about this yet, and most of the people who have said things had previously vocalized that they plain don't like me a long time ago...

but, yeah, those opinions aren't tainted...

Oh!!!! You said you think it was me posting porn? Ahhhh! My fault. I was unaware that you thought.Larry, you are cheating. If I could use Eck's best reliever season, I'd have 6-8 more wins. That's a fact. The rule was put in place to AVOID what you're doing now. You're using a relief pitcher's BEST season as a reliever. YOU ARE CHEATING.

It's really no matter. Last time you do one of these with us and whatever result you end up with here will not be recognized. I'm assuming if you don't make the change, your team will be locked from you accessing it. And to be honest, even if you DO make the change, you should be tossed from this thread, tossed from the league and tossed from the planet.

You better f'ing change Quantrill then or your gonna have trouble.

I'm taking this as a personal threat...and if it doesn't stop, I will report this kind of stuff... FYI

That was NOT a threat. Please Larry, have some perspetive. Taking non threats as threats will only have you alienate more people in terms of posters as well as the mods. It simply is not necessary and in my opinion is childish. This is the "running to mom" I mentioned before.

 

[larry_boy_44]

Larry, do you know how much porn is on the internet?  You really thought it was your Christian duty to rat on one of 20 or so guys who post in a thread the rest of the FFA could care less about?  What, you think some 8 year old kid was going to access this site and have his religious mind scarred for life cuz he saw some boobies?

and what you thought that just because you had a really long thread that you could post whatever you wanted even though it clearly broke the rules of hte board?what would Joe say about that UCONN??

I don't really care what Joe would say about it. Do you miss your Hall Monitor days or something?

no, I just think your pretty pathetic if you actually get pissed because someone expects you to respect the rules of the board you are posting on...if you don't like it, leave, tis been said before...

#### you. You're a #####. Anybody that trusts you is a fool. Anybody that has any non-required involvement w/ your life is worse off for it. You give everything you try to stand for a bad name and guys like me a great reason to stay the hell away from a church pew.

why? because you think I broke a rule that was never actually stated?because I think we should actually follow the rules other people put on things that they put up?

because I got out of the third grade when it was cool to break rules because you saw a way that you could break them?

grow up, UCONN...

ok. glad to hear Joe passed out the Hall Monitor sashes to the right guys. You're pathetic. Glad you don't go anywhere near the gambling threads. Actually guys like you are why I don't post in there. I'm sure your Christian duty includes informing the IRS who may or may not be reporting their winnings. I honestly couldn't look myself in the mirror, much less claim to have the inside track to paradise, if I lived my life like you.

1. there is nothing in the gambling threads breaking the board rules (as far as I know)...second, how childish and hypocritical is it to be mad at me for "cheating" in this when you are saying its ok to cheat other places (like cheating the IRS for example...)

larry, you aren't that smart. that's ok. you should just learn to accept this. you reporting someone in the FFA Baseball Draft community of posting some pic of a girl's boobies is just as bad as reporting someone from the FBG community to the IRS for Grambling and not telling Uncle about it. How you missed that analogy I don't know. I personally don't really give a damn if you cheated. It's wrong...and kind of funny coming from Mr. God Boy himself, but oh well. To report someone like that shows your true character, and yes I'm sure Joe would be on your side and say "that's a good boy Larry, thanks for helping me out" but everybody else knows it just makes you a ##### and a POS that can't be trusted and is worthless as a human contact.

you only think that 'cuz you still think that you are grade or middle school or something and that doing bad things is cool...eventually, one day, you will grow up and realize that doing bad things don't make you cool...

man, I didn't realize that I was on a board with a bunch of middle-schoolers...

 

[Doug B]

if we are gonna say that someone is cheating, yes...

besides, I asked straight out "could I use the third best reliever season if I wanted to?" and the answer was "yes", there was no "YOU HAVE TO!!" or anything like that...

Wow. You really needed that "You HAVE to!"? No kidding?Who wants to wade through pages of legalese just to set up an online draft? I'm sure Capella does enough of that IRL. This is supposed to be fun, not work.

Let's forget about Quantrill and Sallee for a moment. I can think of a more fundamental matter upon which to take a league vote:

If a consensus is reached for you to sell your team back to the league, would you sell back?

No hard feelings -- it's just a bad fit. Your assumptions and approach to this kind of thing are so far at odds with everyone else's, the entire enterprise suffers. However, I do think you'd be entitled to your money back.

 

[Funkley]

Another. Let's just play w/o him next time and be done with it.

Agree with Funkley and Spock's takes about larry_boy's use of Quantrill.That said, I also agree with Sammy -- there's no durned way that Quantrill is responsible for LB's team's record to date ... and what goes up must come down. How much difference could Quantrill really be making? I know he's statistically good so far, but still.

Dude, Quantrill is one of the main reasons LB has had so much success. most of us are losing games late. Larry hasn't lost late at all. Quantrill has been unhittible. If you really want to continue using the "aw-shucks, I'm not doing anything wrong" defense Larry, I'm fine with it. You're not doing another league with us anyway and most of us recognize the rule dodging you've done in this one. Your result in this league will be tainted. Enjoy winning cheaply.

Now, personally Larry....I DID NOT post porn anywhere in this thread. If you want to post lies about me, you're a bigger **** than I though. I guess it's par for the course, given your history of cheating. If you want to report my posts for calling you a "gay, cheating whore" or a "gay, dirty whore", I guess that's fine too. Should I report the posts you call me somebody's "#####"?

Bottom line is, you're really not a good guy Larry. You sell out your "friends" and do whatever it takes to beat them. You lost a lot of respect last night, from MANY people (if that was possible).

woah there, Nipsey... for one I said I thought it was you... I didn't say it was you...someone did post legit porn in here...

second, I didn't sell out anyone, and I didn't cheat... The only people cheating are the ones deciding to change the rules now without everyone's approval....

half the people in the league haven't said anything about this yet, and most of the people who have said things had previously vocalized that they plain don't like me a long time ago...

but, yeah, those opinions aren't tainted...

Oh!!!! You said you think it was me posting porn? Ahhhh! My fault. I was unaware that you thought.Larry, you are cheating. If I could use Eck's best reliever season, I'd have 6-8 more wins. That's a fact. The rule was put in place to AVOID what you're doing now. You're using a relief pitcher's BEST season as a reliever. YOU ARE CHEATING.

It's really no matter. Last time you do one of these with us and whatever result you end up with here will not be recognized. I'm assuming if you don't make the change, your team will be locked from you accessing it. And to be honest, even if you DO make the change, you should be tossed from this thread, tossed from the league and tossed from the planet.

You better f'ing change Quantrill then or your gonna have trouble.

I'm taking this as a personal threat...and if it doesn't stop, I will report this kind of stuff... FYI

That was NOT a threat. Please Larry, have some perspetive. Taking non threats as threats will only have you alienate more people in terms of posters as well as the mods. It simply is not necessary and in my opinion is childish. This is the "running to mom" I mentioned before.

Honestly I meant to quote a post from Norwood. LMAO at the fact Larry thinks I was serious. Someone loan him Savard's sarcasm-o-meter.

 

[10993]

I took care of the problem that was pointed out with my squad--did you, Larry? Larry, have you sent your ticket in?

 

[UCONN]

Larry, do you know how much porn is on the internet?  You really thought it was your Christian duty to rat on one of 20 or so guys who post in a thread the rest of the FFA could care less about?  What, you think some 8 year old kid was going to access this site and have his religious mind scarred for life cuz he saw some boobies?

and what you thought that just because you had a really long thread that you could post whatever you wanted even though it clearly broke the rules of hte board?what would Joe say about that UCONN??

I don't really care what Joe would say about it. Do you miss your Hall Monitor days or something?

no, I just think your pretty pathetic if you actually get pissed because someone expects you to respect the rules of the board you are posting on...if you don't like it, leave, tis been said before...

#### you. You're a #####. Anybody that trusts you is a fool. Anybody that has any non-required involvement w/ your life is worse off for it. You give everything you try to stand for a bad name and guys like me a great reason to stay the hell away from a church pew.

why? because you think I broke a rule that was never actually stated?because I think we should actually follow the rules other people put on things that they put up?

because I got out of the third grade when it was cool to break rules because you saw a way that you could break them?

grow up, UCONN...

ok. glad to hear Joe passed out the Hall Monitor sashes to the right guys. You're pathetic. Glad you don't go anywhere near the gambling threads. Actually guys like you are why I don't post in there. I'm sure your Christian duty includes informing the IRS who may or may not be reporting their winnings. I honestly couldn't look myself in the mirror, much less claim to have the inside track to paradise, if I lived my life like you.

1. there is nothing in the gambling threads breaking the board rules (as far as I know)...second, how childish and hypocritical is it to be mad at me for "cheating" in this when you are saying its ok to cheat other places (like cheating the IRS for example...)

larry, you aren't that smart. that's ok. you should just learn to accept this. you reporting someone in the FFA Baseball Draft community of posting some pic of a girl's boobies is just as bad as reporting someone from the FBG community to the IRS for Grambling and not telling Uncle about it. How you missed that analogy I don't know. I personally don't really give a damn if you cheated. It's wrong...and kind of funny coming from Mr. God Boy himself, but oh well. To report someone like that shows your true character, and yes I'm sure Joe would be on your side and say "that's a good boy Larry, thanks for helping me out" but everybody else knows it just makes you a ##### and a POS that can't be trusted and is worthless as a human contact.

you only think that 'cuz you still think that you are grade or middle school or something and that doing bad things is cool...eventually, one day, you will grow up and realize that doing bad things don't make you cool...

man, I didn't realize that I was on a board with a bunch of middle-schoolers...

This coming from the guy who misses his days as Hall Monitor Larry. Pal, I live my life. You believe in Dragons, have 18th century views on the husband to wife relationship, proboably believe in Zeuss, and will turn on an "internet friend" over a pic of some boobies so you can pat yourself on the back for being a "grown up" who still likes to tattle to the principle. You're a POS and I'm done w/ you. I feel bad for anyone who has any kind of real relationship w/ you because you are a worthless human being.

 

[Funkley]

Larry, do you know how much porn is on the internet?  You really thought it was your Christian duty to rat on one of 20 or so guys who post in a thread the rest of the FFA could care less about?  What, you think some 8 year old kid was going to access this site and have his religious mind scarred for life cuz he saw some boobies?

and what you thought that just because you had a really long thread that you could post whatever you wanted even though it clearly broke the rules of hte board?what would Joe say about that UCONN??

I don't really care what Joe would say about it. Do you miss your Hall Monitor days or something?

no, I just think your pretty pathetic if you actually get pissed because someone expects you to respect the rules of the board you are posting on...if you don't like it, leave, tis been said before...

#### you. You're a #####. Anybody that trusts you is a fool. Anybody that has any non-required involvement w/ your life is worse off for it. You give everything you try to stand for a bad name and guys like me a great reason to stay the hell away from a church pew.

why? because you think I broke a rule that was never actually stated?because I think we should actually follow the rules other people put on things that they put up?

because I got out of the third grade when it was cool to break rules because you saw a way that you could break them?

grow up, UCONN...

ok. glad to hear Joe passed out the Hall Monitor sashes to the right guys. You're pathetic. Glad you don't go anywhere near the gambling threads. Actually guys like you are why I don't post in there. I'm sure your Christian duty includes informing the IRS who may or may not be reporting their winnings. I honestly couldn't look myself in the mirror, much less claim to have the inside track to paradise, if I lived my life like you.

1. there is nothing in the gambling threads breaking the board rules (as far as I know)...second, how childish and hypocritical is it to be mad at me for "cheating" in this when you are saying its ok to cheat other places (like cheating the IRS for example...)

larry, you aren't that smart. that's ok. you should just learn to accept this. you reporting someone in the FFA Baseball Draft community of posting some pic of a girl's boobies is just as bad as reporting someone from the FBG community to the IRS for Grambling and not telling Uncle about it. How you missed that analogy I don't know. I personally don't really give a damn if you cheated. It's wrong...and kind of funny coming from Mr. God Boy himself, but oh well. To report someone like that shows your true character, and yes I'm sure Joe would be on your side and say "that's a good boy Larry, thanks for helping me out" but everybody else knows it just makes you a ##### and a POS that can't be trusted and is worthless as a human contact.

you only think that 'cuz you still think that you are grade or middle school or something and that doing bad things is cool...eventually, one day, you will grow up and realize that doing bad things don't make you cool...

man, I didn't realize that I was on a board with a bunch of middle-schoolers...

You didn't? I must've missed all the maturity up to this point.

 

[Doug B]

Except he's 8 games ahead of everyone in games played against "real teams". so while Quantrill may be important, it would only drop him back to even with the top teams, which I think we can all agree he shouldn't be.

Sammy -- I have to call here. Think about it reasonably:Larry_boy's record has nothing to do with it. Even w/o Quantrill, his team would at worst be a .667 squad in this sim. To assume otherwise is to make oneself vulnerable to the accusation that it's all about LB's record. And it's not.

 

[Funkley]

if we are gonna say that someone is cheating, yes...

besides, I asked straight out "could I use the third best reliever season if I wanted to?" and the answer was "yes", there was no "YOU HAVE TO!!" or anything like that...

Wow. You really needed that "You HAVE to!"? No kidding?Who wants to wade through pages of legalese just to set up an online draft? I'm sure Capella does enough of that IRL. This is supposed to be fun, not work.

Let's forget about Quantrill and Sallee for a moment. I can think of a more fundamental matter upon which to take a league vote:

If a consensus is reached for you to sell your team back to the league, would you sell back?

No hard feelings -- it's just a bad fit. Your assumptions and approach to this kind of thing are so far at odds with everyone else's, the entire enterprise suffers. However, I do think you'd be entitled to your money back.

In

 

[larry_boy_44]

Larry, do you know how much porn is on the internet?  You really thought it was your Christian duty to rat on one of 20 or so guys who post in a thread the rest of the FFA could care less about?  What, you think some 8 year old kid was going to access this site and have his religious mind scarred for life cuz he saw some boobies?

and what you thought that just because you had a really long thread that you could post whatever you wanted even though it clearly broke the rules of hte board?

what would Joe say about that UCONN??

I don't really care what Joe would say about it. Do you miss your Hall Monitor days or something?

no, I just think your pretty pathetic if you actually get pissed because someone expects you to respect the rules of the board you are posting on...

if you don't like it, leave, tis been said before...

#### you. You're a #####. Anybody that trusts you is a fool. Anybody that has any non-required involvement w/ your life is worse off for it. You give everything you try to stand for a bad name and guys like me a great reason to stay the hell away from a church pew.

why? because you think I broke a rule that was never actually stated?

because I think we should actually follow the rules other people put on things that they put up?

because I got out of the third grade when it was cool to break rules because you saw a way that you could break them?

grow up, UCONN...

ok. glad to hear Joe passed out the Hall Monitor sashes to the right guys. You're pathetic. Glad you don't go anywhere near the gambling threads. Actually guys like you are why I don't post in there. I'm sure your Christian duty includes informing the IRS who may or may not be reporting their winnings. I honestly couldn't look myself in the mirror, much less claim to have the inside track to paradise, if I lived my life like you.

1. there is nothing in the gambling threads breaking the board rules (as far as I know)...

second, how childish and hypocritical is it to be mad at me for "cheating" in this when you are saying its ok to cheat other places (like cheating the IRS for example...)

larry, you aren't that smart. that's ok. you should just learn to accept this. you reporting someone in the FFA Baseball Draft community of posting some pic of a girl's boobies is just as bad as reporting someone from the FBG community to the IRS for Grambling and not telling Uncle about it. How you missed that analogy I don't know. I personally don't really give a damn if you cheated. It's wrong...and kind of funny coming from Mr. God Boy himself, but oh well. To report someone like that shows your true character, and yes I'm sure Joe would be on your side and say "that's a good boy Larry, thanks for helping me out" but everybody else knows it just makes you a ##### and a POS that can't be trusted and is worthless as a human contact.

you only think that 'cuz you still think that you are grade or middle school or something and that doing bad things is cool...

eventually, one day, you will grow up and realize that doing bad things don't make you cool...

man, I didn't realize that I was on a board with a bunch of middle-schoolers...

This coming from the guy who misses his days as Hall Monitor Larry. Pal, I live my life. You believe in Dragons, have 18th century views on the husband to wife relationship, proboably believe in Zeuss, and will turn on an "internet friend" over a pic of some boobies so you can pat yourself on the back for being a "grown up" who still likes to tattle to the principle. You're a POS and I'm done w/ you. I feel bad for anyone who has any kind of real relationship w/ you because you are a worthless human being.

and you think that posting boobies on a message board where it clearly said to be wrong to do so is ok and cool and something that should be done...

I am a worthless human being because why? because I think we should have respect for the rules that Joe and the other mods put up here?

 

[larry_boy_44]

umm... how exactly do I change the year I have for Quantrill??*can't find it*

 

[10993]

Just noticed that you simfished Wakefield's 3rd year too, Larry... and to think people were wondering why he was picked. Name Team T IP/162 ERA W-L S WHIP OAV BB/9 K/9 HR/9 Salary1. Wakefield, Tim 1995 Boston Red Sox R 220 2.95 16-8 0 1.18 .218 3.13 5.48 1.01 $7,098,0942. Wakefield, Tim 2003 Boston Red Sox R 202 4.09 11-7 1 1.30 .241 3.16 7.52 1.02 $6,172,9563. Wakefield, Tim 2002 Boston Red Sox R 163 2.81 11-5 3 1.05 .198 2.81 7.39 0.83 $6,147,258"3rd year" was lowest ERA, WHIP, and OAV of his career--by a tremendous margin.

 

[Doug B]

Guys, you all have made this way too personal (and please don't play the "he started it, Mom!" card). The SP/RP pitcher rule and how it was ratified are the issues here.

How is anything about LB's online personna even halfway relevant?

 

[10993]

if we are gonna say that someone is cheating, yes...

besides, I asked straight out "could I use the third best reliever season if I wanted to?" and the answer was "yes", there was no "YOU HAVE TO!!" or anything like that...

Wow. You really needed that "You HAVE to!"? No kidding?Who wants to wade through pages of legalese just to set up an online draft? I'm sure Capella does enough of that IRL. This is supposed to be fun, not work.

Let's forget about Quantrill and Sallee for a moment. I can think of a more fundamental matter upon which to take a league vote:

If a consensus is reached for you to sell your team back to the league, would you sell back?

No hard feelings -- it's just a bad fit. Your assumptions and approach to this kind of thing are so far at odds with everyone else's, the entire enterprise suffers. However, I do think you'd be entitled to your money back.

In

I'll buy back the whole team myself.

 

[Politician Spock]

Larry, do you know how much porn is on the internet?  You really thought it was your Christian duty to rat on one of 20 or so guys who post in a thread the rest of the FFA could care less about?  What, you think some 8 year old kid was going to access this site and have his religious mind scarred for life cuz he saw some boobies?

and what you thought that just because you had a really long thread that you could post whatever you wanted even though it clearly broke the rules of hte board?what would Joe say about that UCONN??

I don't really care what Joe would say about it. Do you miss your Hall Monitor days or something?

no, I just think your pretty pathetic if you actually get pissed because someone expects you to respect the rules of the board you are posting on...if you don't like it, leave, tis been said before...

#### you. You're a #####. Anybody that trusts you is a fool. Anybody that has any non-required involvement w/ your life is worse off for it. You give everything you try to stand for a bad name and guys like me a great reason to stay the hell away from a church pew.

why? because you think I broke a rule that was never actually stated?because I think we should actually follow the rules other people put on things that they put up?

because I got out of the third grade when it was cool to break rules because you saw a way that you could break them?

grow up, UCONN...

ok. glad to hear Joe passed out the Hall Monitor sashes to the right guys. You're pathetic. Glad you don't go anywhere near the gambling threads. Actually guys like you are why I don't post in there. I'm sure your Christian duty includes informing the IRS who may or may not be reporting their winnings. I honestly couldn't look myself in the mirror, much less claim to have the inside track to paradise, if I lived my life like you.

1. there is nothing in the gambling threads breaking the board rules (as far as I know)...second, how childish and hypocritical is it to be mad at me for "cheating" in this when you are saying its ok to cheat other places (like cheating the IRS for example...)

larry, you aren't that smart. that's ok. you should just learn to accept this. you reporting someone in the FFA Baseball Draft community of posting some pic of a girl's boobies is just as bad as reporting someone from the FBG community to the IRS for Grambling and not telling Uncle about it. How you missed that analogy I don't know. I personally don't really give a damn if you cheated. It's wrong...and kind of funny coming from Mr. God Boy himself, but oh well. To report someone like that shows your true character, and yes I'm sure Joe would be on your side and say "that's a good boy Larry, thanks for helping me out" but everybody else knows it just makes you a ##### and a POS that can't be trusted and is worthless as a human contact.

you only think that 'cuz you still think that you are grade or middle school or something and that doing bad things is cool...eventually, one day, you will grow up and realize that doing bad things don't make you cool...

man, I didn't realize that I was on a board with a bunch of middle-schoolers...

Larry, it's well known that I have gotten into some lenghty arguments with Mr. Pickles and Koya on this board. I can't speak for the both of them but I can honestly say that after the 300+ pages of this thread I have a much greater respect for the both of them. If I were ever to actually meet them in a bar, I buy them a drink and ask that bygones be bygones. Perhaps they still can't stand me, and that's okay. I've probably deserved it. But I'd be shocked if this thread didn't improve their opinion of me. I honestly make the claim that most everyone in this thread got to like everyone a little bit more than when we first started.... EXCEPT YOU! I can't expain why. Maybe it's intentional on your part. Maybe you just don't want to like people (let alone love them like you are commanded to do). Or maybe you are just so deep into your legalism in your church that you honestly can no longer appreciate a person at all anymore and can only see them for their sin.

 

[larry_boy_44]

Except he's 8 games ahead of everyone in games played against "real teams".  so while Quantrill may be important, it would only drop him back to even with the top teams, which I think we can all agree he shouldn't be.

Sammy -- I have to call here. Think about it reasonably:Larry_boy's record has nothing to do with it. Even w/o Quantrill, his team would at worst be a .667 squad in this sim. To assume otherwise is to make oneself vulnerable to the accusation that it's all about LB's record. And it's not.

but it IS about that with a few of the people complaining...they can't stand the fact that I might actually ahve a good team, 'cuz they don't like me and they felt like ripping my picks the whole draft...

it is about my record with a few of the people complaining... I am 100% convinced of it...

 

[Nipsey]

Another. Let's just play w/o him next time and be done with it.

Agree with Funkley and Spock's takes about larry_boy's use of Quantrill.That said, I also agree with Sammy -- there's no durned way that Quantrill is responsible for LB's team's record to date ... and what goes up must come down. How much difference could Quantrill really be making? I know he's statistically good so far, but still.

Dude, Quantrill is one of the main reasons LB has had so much success. most of us are losing games late. Larry hasn't lost late at all. Quantrill has been unhittible. If you really want to continue using the "aw-shucks, I'm not doing anything wrong" defense Larry, I'm fine with it. You're not doing another league with us anyway and most of us recognize the rule dodging you've done in this one. Your result in this league will be tainted. Enjoy winning cheaply.

Now, personally Larry....I DID NOT post porn anywhere in this thread. If you want to post lies about me, you're a bigger **** than I though. I guess it's par for the course, given your history of cheating. If you want to report my posts for calling you a "gay, cheating whore" or a "gay, dirty whore", I guess that's fine too. Should I report the posts you call me somebody's "#####"?

Bottom line is, you're really not a good guy Larry. You sell out your "friends" and do whatever it takes to beat them. You lost a lot of respect last night, from MANY people (if that was possible).

woah there, Nipsey... for one I said I thought it was you... I didn't say it was you...someone did post legit porn in here...

second, I didn't sell out anyone, and I didn't cheat... The only people cheating are the ones deciding to change the rules now without everyone's approval....

half the people in the league haven't said anything about this yet, and most of the people who have said things had previously vocalized that they plain don't like me a long time ago...

but, yeah, those opinions aren't tainted...

Oh!!!! You said you think it was me posting porn? Ahhhh! My fault. I was unaware that you thought.Larry, you are cheating. If I could use Eck's best reliever season, I'd have 6-8 more wins. That's a fact. The rule was put in place to AVOID what you're doing now. You're using a relief pitcher's BEST season as a reliever. YOU ARE CHEATING.

It's really no matter. Last time you do one of these with us and whatever result you end up with here will not be recognized. I'm assuming if you don't make the change, your team will be locked from you accessing it. And to be honest, even if you DO make the change, you should be tossed from this thread, tossed from the league and tossed from the planet.

You better f'ing change Quantrill then or your gonna have trouble.

I'm taking this as a personal threat...and if it doesn't stop, I will report this kind of stuff... FYI

That was NOT a threat. Please Larry, have some perspetive. Taking non threats as threats will only have you alienate more people in terms of posters as well as the mods. It simply is not necessary and in my opinion is childish. This is the "running to mom" I mentioned before.

Koya...can we please refrain from using personal attacks?:hypocrite:

 

[10993]

Boy, Larry--have you ever opened up a can of worms. Look what you did with Bobby Bonilla: PLAYER TEAM BATS AB BA OB% SLG% HR/100 HR BB K SB SPD SALARY C 1B 2B 3B SS OF1. Bonilla, Bobby 1991 Pittsburgh Pirates S 577 .302 .398 .492 3.1 18 90 67 2 61 $5,724,358 -- A+/D -- C-/B- -- A/C2. Bonilla, Bobby 1995 New York Mets S 554 .329 .390 .576 5.1 28 54 79 0 62 $5,693,230 -- D-/D -- D/D+ -- B-/C3. Bonilla, Bobby 1995 Baltimore Orioles S 554 .329 .390 .576 5.1 28 54 79 0 62 $5,693,230 -- D-/D -- D/D+ -- B-/C4. Bonilla, Bobby 1988 Pittsburgh Pirates S 584 .274 .370 .476 4.1 24 85 82 3 60 $4,810,927 -- -- -- C/B -- --You're using his 1995 season, Larry!! That's his second best season! You cheated! There is no doubt in my mind that you have done this intentionally, given the extent to which you have cheated the other players as well.

 

[larry_boy_44]

Just noticed that you simfished Wakefield's 3rd year too, Larry... and to think people were wondering why he was picked.

  Name Team T IP/162 ERA W-L S WHIP OAV BB/9 K/9 HR/9 Salary

1. Wakefield, Tim 1995 Boston Red Sox R 220 2.95 16-8 0 1.18 .218 3.13 5.48 1.01 $7,098,094

2. Wakefield, Tim 2003 Boston Red Sox R 202 4.09 11-7 1 1.30 .241 3.16 7.52 1.02 $6,172,956

3. Wakefield, Tim 2002 Boston Red Sox R 163 2.81 11-5 3 1.05 .198 2.81 7.39 0.83 $6,147,258

"3rd year" was lowest ERA, WHIP, and OAV of his career--by a tremendous margin.

dude, I picked Wakefield without even looking up his stats on baseball-reference... I definately didn't look him up on WIS... :rotflmao:

quit being so paranoid...

 

[Koya]

Guys, you all have made this way too personal (and please don't play the "he started it, Mom!" card). The SP/RP pitcher rule and how it was ratified are the issues here.

How is anything about LB's online personna even halfway relevant?

I agree. I understand people are pissed, but the more we make this personal, the worse it will be for everyone.Sorry if that is interpreted as a "high horse" by some - I am just hoping to not have this thread locked/deleted.

It has become a part of my life.



(whoa, smilies are back?)

 

[larry_boy_44]

Guys, you all have made this way too personal (and please don't play the "he started it, Mom!" card). The SP/RP pitcher rule and how it was ratified are the issues here.

How is anything about LB's online personna even halfway relevant?

because this is all about how they don't like me...

 

[Koya]

Another. Let's just play w/o him next time and be done with it.

Agree with Funkley and Spock's takes about larry_boy's use of Quantrill.That said, I also agree with Sammy -- there's no durned way that Quantrill is responsible for LB's team's record to date ... and what goes up must come down. How much difference could Quantrill really be making? I know he's statistically good so far, but still.

Dude, Quantrill is one of the main reasons LB has had so much success. most of us are losing games late. Larry hasn't lost late at all. Quantrill has been unhittible. If you really want to continue using the "aw-shucks, I'm not doing anything wrong" defense Larry, I'm fine with it. You're not doing another league with us anyway and most of us recognize the rule dodging you've done in this one. Your result in this league will be tainted. Enjoy winning cheaply.

Now, personally Larry....I DID NOT post porn anywhere in this thread. If you want to post lies about me, you're a bigger **** than I though. I guess it's par for the course, given your history of cheating. If you want to report my posts for calling you a "gay, cheating whore" or a "gay, dirty whore", I guess that's fine too. Should I report the posts you call me somebody's "#####"?

Bottom line is, you're really not a good guy Larry. You sell out your "friends" and do whatever it takes to beat them. You lost a lot of respect last night, from MANY people (if that was possible).

woah there, Nipsey... for one I said I thought it was you... I didn't say it was you...someone did post legit porn in here...

second, I didn't sell out anyone, and I didn't cheat... The only people cheating are the ones deciding to change the rules now without everyone's approval....

half the people in the league haven't said anything about this yet, and most of the people who have said things had previously vocalized that they plain don't like me a long time ago...

but, yeah, those opinions aren't tainted...

Oh!!!! You said you think it was me posting porn? Ahhhh! My fault. I was unaware that you thought.Larry, you are cheating. If I could use Eck's best reliever season, I'd have 6-8 more wins. That's a fact. The rule was put in place to AVOID what you're doing now. You're using a relief pitcher's BEST season as a reliever. YOU ARE CHEATING.

It's really no matter. Last time you do one of these with us and whatever result you end up with here will not be recognized. I'm assuming if you don't make the change, your team will be locked from you accessing it. And to be honest, even if you DO make the change, you should be tossed from this thread, tossed from the league and tossed from the planet.

You better f'ing change Quantrill then or your gonna have trouble.

I'm taking this as a personal threat...and if it doesn't stop, I will report this kind of stuff... FYI

That was NOT a threat. Please Larry, have some perspetive. Taking non threats as threats will only have you alienate more people in terms of posters as well as the mods. It simply is not necessary and in my opinion is childish. This is the "running to mom" I mentioned before.

Koya...can we please refrain from using personal attacks?:hypocrite:

:reported: (I admit it, I have no good comeback)

 

[larry_boy_44]

Larry, do you know how much porn is on the internet?  You really thought it was your Christian duty to rat on one of 20 or so guys who post in a thread the rest of the FFA could care less about?  What, you think some 8 year old kid was going to access this site and have his religious mind scarred for life cuz he saw some boobies?

and what you thought that just because you had a really long thread that you could post whatever you wanted even though it clearly broke the rules of hte board?

what would Joe say about that UCONN??

I don't really care what Joe would say about it. Do you miss your Hall Monitor days or something?

no, I just think your pretty pathetic if you actually get pissed because someone expects you to respect the rules of the board you are posting on...

if you don't like it, leave, tis been said before...

#### you. You're a #####. Anybody that trusts you is a fool. Anybody that has any non-required involvement w/ your life is worse off for it. You give everything you try to stand for a bad name and guys like me a great reason to stay the hell away from a church pew.

why? because you think I broke a rule that was never actually stated?

because I think we should actually follow the rules other people put on things that they put up?

because I got out of the third grade when it was cool to break rules because you saw a way that you could break them?

grow up, UCONN...

ok. glad to hear Joe passed out the Hall Monitor sashes to the right guys. You're pathetic. Glad you don't go anywhere near the gambling threads. Actually guys like you are why I don't post in there. I'm sure your Christian duty includes informing the IRS who may or may not be reporting their winnings. I honestly couldn't look myself in the mirror, much less claim to have the inside track to paradise, if I lived my life like you.

1. there is nothing in the gambling threads breaking the board rules (as far as I know)...

second, how childish and hypocritical is it to be mad at me for "cheating" in this when you are saying its ok to cheat other places (like cheating the IRS for example...)

larry, you aren't that smart. that's ok. you should just learn to accept this. you reporting someone in the FFA Baseball Draft community of posting some pic of a girl's boobies is just as bad as reporting someone from the FBG community to the IRS for Grambling and not telling Uncle about it. How you missed that analogy I don't know. I personally don't really give a damn if you cheated. It's wrong...and kind of funny coming from Mr. God Boy himself, but oh well. To report someone like that shows your true character, and yes I'm sure Joe would be on your side and say "that's a good boy Larry, thanks for helping me out" but everybody else knows it just makes you a ##### and a POS that can't be trusted and is worthless as a human contact.

you only think that 'cuz you still think that you are grade or middle school or something and that doing bad things is cool...

eventually, one day, you will grow up and realize that doing bad things don't make you cool...

man, I didn't realize that I was on a board with a bunch of middle-schoolers...

Larry, it's well known that I have gotten into some lenghty arguments with Mr. Pickles and Koya on this board. I can't speak for the both of them but I can honestly say that after the 300+ pages of this thread I have a much greater respect for the both of them. If I were ever to actually meet them in a bar, I buy them a drink and ask that bygones be bygones. Perhaps they still can't stand me, and that's okay. I've probably deserved it. But I'd be shocked if this thread didn't improve their opinion of me. I honestly make the claim that most everyone in this thread got to like everyone a little bit more than when we first started.... EXCEPT YOU! I can't expain why. Maybe it's intentional on your part. Maybe you just don't want to like people (let alone love them like you are commanded to do). Or maybe you are just so deep into your legalism in your church that you honestly can no longer appreciate a person at all anymore and can only see them for their sin.

and I don't see how my religion has anythign at all to do with anything in this thread except it gives you more reasons to bash me...

 

[10993]

Boy, Larry--have you ever opened up a can of worms. Look what you did with Bobby Bonilla:

PLAYER TEAM BATS AB BA OB% SLG% HR/100 HR BB K SB SPD SALARY C 1B 2B 3B SS OF

1. Bonilla, Bobby 1991 Pittsburgh Pirates S 577 .302 .398 .492 3.1 18 90 67 2 61 $5,724,358 -- A+/D -- C-/B- -- A/C

2. Bonilla, Bobby 1995 New York Mets S 554 .329 .390 .576 5.1 28 54 79 0 62 $5,693,230 -- D-/D -- D/D+ -- B-/C

3. Bonilla, Bobby 1995 Baltimore Orioles S 554 .329 .390 .576 5.1 28 54 79 0 62 $5,693,230 -- D-/D -- D/D+ -- B-/C

4. Bonilla, Bobby 1988 Pittsburgh Pirates S 584 .274 .370 .476 4.1 24 85 82 3 60 $4,810,927 -- -- -- C/B -- --

You're using his 1995 season, Larry!! That's his second best season! You cheated! There is no doubt in my mind that you have done this intentionally, given the extent to which you have cheated the other players as well.

Larry? This is strike three. Quantrill, Smoltz, Bonilla. You are systematically trying to cheat us.

 

[larry_boy_44]

Boy, Larry--have you ever opened up a can of worms. Look what you did with Bobby Bonilla:

PLAYER TEAM BATS AB BA OB% SLG% HR/100 HR BB K SB SPD SALARY C 1B 2B 3B SS OF

1. Bonilla, Bobby 1991 Pittsburgh Pirates S 577 .302 .398 .492 3.1 18 90 67 2 61 $5,724,358 -- A+/D -- C-/B- -- A/C

2. Bonilla, Bobby 1995 New York Mets S 554 .329 .390 .576 5.1 28 54 79 0 62 $5,693,230 -- D-/D -- D/D+ -- B-/C

3. Bonilla, Bobby 1995 Baltimore Orioles S 554 .329 .390 .576 5.1 28 54 79 0 62 $5,693,230 -- D-/D -- D/D+ -- B-/C

4. Bonilla, Bobby 1988 Pittsburgh Pirates S 584 .274 .370 .476 4.1 24 85 82 3 60 $4,810,927 -- -- -- C/B -- --

You're using his 1995 season, Larry!! That's his second best season! You cheated! There is no doubt in my mind that you have done this intentionally, given the extent to which you have cheated the other players as well.

your correct... I hadn't noticed that...*hates WIS and thier stupid team-changing stuff*

I will change that...

as soon as I figure out how... (HELP!!)

 

[Nipsey]

umm... how exactly do I change the year I have for Quantrill??

*can't find it*

Too late. We just want you to leave now. Don't bother changing it. Godspeed.

 

[Politician Spock]

Larry, it's well known that I have gotten into some lenghty arguments with Mr. Pickles and Koya on this board. I can't speak for the both of them but I can honestly say that after the 300+ pages of this thread I have a much greater respect for the both of them. If I were ever to actually meet them in a bar, I buy them a drink and ask that bygones be bygones. Perhaps they still can't stand me, and that's okay. I've probably deserved it. But I'd be shocked if this thread didn't improve their opinion of me. I honestly make the claim that most everyone in this thread got to like everyone a little bit more than when we first started.... EXCEPT YOU! I can't expain why. Maybe it's intentional on your part. Maybe you just don't want to like people (let alone love them like you are commanded to do). Or maybe you are just so deep into your legalism in your church that you honestly can no longer appreciate a person at all anymore and can only see them for their sin.

and I don't see how my religion has anythign at all to do with anything in this thread except it gives you more reasons to bash me...

I didn't say it was religion. I am a Christian as well. I said "or maybe you are just so deep into your legalism". I'm not bashing religion. I'm bashing legalism.

 

[ScottNorwood]

Bonilla got drafted in an all time mlb draft? what the hell?

 

[larry_boy_44]

Boy, Larry--have you ever opened up a can of worms.  Look what you did with Bobby Bonilla:

  PLAYER TEAM BATS AB BA OB% SLG% HR/100 HR BB K SB SPD SALARY C 1B 2B 3B SS OF

1. Bonilla, Bobby 1991 Pittsburgh Pirates S 577 .302 .398 .492 3.1 18 90 67 2 61 $5,724,358 -- A+/D -- C-/B- -- A/C

2. Bonilla, Bobby 1995 New York Mets S 554 .329 .390 .576 5.1 28 54 79 0 62 $5,693,230 -- D-/D -- D/D+ -- B-/C

3. Bonilla, Bobby 1995 Baltimore Orioles S 554 .329 .390 .576 5.1 28 54 79 0 62 $5,693,230 -- D-/D -- D/D+ -- B-/C

4. Bonilla, Bobby 1988 Pittsburgh Pirates S 584 .274 .370 .476 4.1 24 85 82 3 60 $4,810,927 -- -- -- C/B -- --

You're using his 1995 season, Larry!!  That's his second best season!  You cheated!  There is no doubt in my mind that you have done this intentionally, given the extent to which you have cheated the other players as well.

Larry? This is strike three. Quantrill, Smoltz, Bonilla. You are systematically trying to cheat us.

Smolts was cheating? how?I still don't agree with Quantril being cheating, and Bonilla was a mistake...

but i could almost garuntee all of us have someone on our teams like Bonilla because WIS had a TON of extra years all over the place...

 

[Sammy3469]

Just to clarfiy for all. I don't think Larry has a good team.