What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***OFFICIAL*** FFA MLB Draft (1 Viewer)

Like some, I think we should be allowed to use worse than 3rd, but it really doesn't matter to me.
OK, then, here's a straw poll so far:FOURTH-SALARY-YEAR-OR-WORSE Proposal:

FOR

Doug B

Koya

Sammy

larry_boy

AGAINST

ø

.
You can put me down as a For, no problem with it.
 
Like some, I think we should be allowed to use worse than 3rd, but it really doesn't matter to me.
OK, then, here's a straw poll so far:FOURTH-SALARY-YEAR-OR-WORSE Proposal:

FOR

Doug B

Koya

Sammy

larry_boy

AGAINST

ø

.
You can put me down as a For, no problem with it.
Against. I'd be for it only if it involved positional issues. I think we've drafted too many great players to allow picking and choosing statistically specific seasons at this point. Too late for streamlining teams when the draft is 90% over.... :2cents:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
STRAW POLL

PROPOSED -- For the purpose of accurate simulation, each team owner may use a fourth or worse ranked season salary from Whatifsports.com for no more than four (4) players.

FOR

Doug B

Koya

Sammy

larry_boy

Kraft

AGAINST

Nipsey

(Edited to add Nipsey's result and to clarify straw poll heading - DB)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Like some, I think we should be allowed to use worse than 3rd, but it really doesn't matter to me.
OK, then, here's a straw poll so far:FOURTH-SALARY-YEAR-OR-WORSE Proposal:

FOR

Doug B

Koya

Sammy

larry_boy

AGAINST

ø

.
You can put me down as a For, no problem with it.
Against. I'd be for it only if it involved positional issues. I think we've drafted too many great players to allow picking and choosing statistically specific seasons at this point. Too late for streamlining teams when the draft is 90% over.... :2cents:
The original straw poll does not make clear that the original proposal states that fourth-or worse season could only be used for four players, maximum. Not for all players on a roster.Nipsey, does this make a difference in our opinion?

 
Like some, I think we should be allowed to use worse than 3rd, but it really doesn't matter to me.
OK, then, here's a straw poll so far:FOURTH-SALARY-YEAR-OR-WORSE Proposal:

FOR

Doug B

Koya

Sammy

larry_boy

AGAINST

ø

.
You can put me down as a For, no problem with it.
Against. I'd be for it only if it involved positional issues. I think we've drafted too many great players to allow picking and choosing statistically specific seasons at this point. Too late for streamlining teams when the draft is 90% over.... :2cents:
The original straw poll does not make clear that the original proposal states that fourth-or worse season could only be used for four players, maximum. Not for all players on a roster.Nipsey, does this make a difference in our opinion?
None at all. I think if I were to do that, I change the season for only three players. (and I know it'd make a difference)
 
Nolan Ryan pitched for 27 seasons. However, over 7% of his career walks occured in his WIS third highest salaried season. You don't want to give me the ability to choose another season for Nolan Ryan.

 
Like some, I think we should be allowed to use worse than 3rd, but it really doesn't matter to me.
OK, then, here's a straw poll so far:FOURTH-SALARY-YEAR-OR-WORSE Proposal:

FOR

Doug B

Koya

Sammy

larry_boy

AGAINST

ø

.
You can put me down as a For, no problem with it.
Against. I'd be for it only if it involved positional issues. I think we've drafted too many great players to allow picking and choosing statistically specific seasons at this point. Too late for streamlining teams when the draft is 90% over.... :2cents:
i thought this was only for positional issues?nips, I see you are back so I assume all is good with your pick. im running late but didnt want to hold up things with your pick., be back in an hour to check in again, pelase pm me if my turn comes up so i can see it in email. so much for today not being busy.

 
Question for you math guys, if there are any here:Does it make sense to normalize ALL players to today's standards including those that already play in today's environment? That's what was done in the Normalized Database I'm using and it seems odd to me.Seems like current players are getting penalized when their stats should stay the same.Thoughts?

 
Nolan Ryan pitched for 27 seasons. However, over 7% of his career walks occured in his WIS third highest salaried season. You don't want to give me the ability to choose another season for Nolan Ryan.
When I argued for this two weeks ago, I was told to "stop whining". "Rules are rules" I was told. Suddenly, after we actually complete most of the draft, everyone wants to change the rule? Where were you two weeks ago?
 
Nolan Ryan pitched for 27 seasons. However, over 7% of his career walks occured in his WIS third highest salaried season. You don't want to give me the ability to choose another season for Nolan Ryan.
When I argued for this two weeks ago, I was told to "stop whining". "Rules are rules" I was told. Suddenly, after we actually complete most of the draft, everyone wants to change the rule? Where were you two weeks ago?
(writing from the dallas airport terminal, making a connection)i vote no. this is r*tarded for everyone to continually be trying to make changes to the rules when they see a benefit for themselves in it.
 
GWB, are you going to run these teams on OOTB? How would you rate that program.. pretty sweet? I've been considering getting something like that for a while assuming it's easy to import the stats.I remember way back when my friend had this pretty cool manager type game for the Apple II (yes, this is going way back) where you'd have realistic stats for teams and basically tell the players what to do (hit and run, steal, bunt, etc.) but you didn't actually swing the bat or field like most games. It was purely strategy. We had a lot of fun with it. I have no idea what this game was called but even back then it was pretty kick ###.
Only on page 160 of 190, so I don't know if this was answered but I wanted to post before I forget. Was it Microleague baseball? With a bunch of all-time teams? I spent a lot of time on that game in junior high on the Apple II.
 
Nolan Ryan pitched for 27 seasons. However, over 7% of his career walks occured in his WIS third highest salaried season. You don't want to give me the ability to choose another season for Nolan Ryan.
When I argued for this two weeks ago, I was told to "stop whining". "Rules are rules" I was told. Suddenly, after we actually complete most of the draft, everyone wants to change the rule? Where were you two weeks ago?
:goodposting: Seems like we're going to keep going down this road until the answer changes. I thought it was over.
 
Nolan Ryan pitched for 27 seasons. However, over 7% of his career walks occured in his WIS third highest salaried season. You don't want to give me the ability to choose another season for Nolan Ryan.
When I argued for this two weeks ago, I was told to "stop whining". "Rules are rules" I was told. Suddenly, after we actually complete most of the draft, everyone wants to change the rule? Where were you two weeks ago?
I don't care if the rule is changed. I didn't care two weeks ago. I didn't tell you to stop whinning, but I was shocked that the conversation about it went on for page after page after page, especially when Koya even tried to take the discussion about it to the other thread.
 
STRAW POLL

PROPOSED -- For the purpose of accurate simulation, each team owner may use a fourth or worse ranked season salary from Whatifsports.com for no more than four (4) players.

FOR

Doug B

Koya

Sammy

larry_boy

Kraft

AGAINST

Nipsey

(Edited to add Nipsey's result and to clarify straw poll heading - DB)
I wholeheartedly agree with this.
 
STRAW POLL

PROPOSED -- For the purpose of accurate simulation, each team owner may use a fourth or worse ranked season salary from Whatifsports.com for no more than four (4) players.

FOR

Doug B

Koya

Sammy

larry_boy

Kraft

AGAINST

Nipsey

(Edited to add Nipsey's result and to clarify straw poll heading - DB)
I wholeheartedly agree with this.
PICK!
 
For the record I'm not in favor of changing the rules now. I'd rather just have fun with it and see how the sim plays out. If I have to use Boyer in the sim instead of Killebrew then oh well. It'll be fun regardless.

 
Nolan Ryan pitched for 27 seasons. However, over 7% of his career walks occured in his WIS third highest salaried season. You don't want to give me the ability to choose another season for Nolan Ryan.
When I argued for this two weeks ago, I was told to "stop whining". "Rules are rules" I was told. Suddenly, after we actually complete most of the draft, everyone wants to change the rule? Where were you two weeks ago?
I don't care if the rule is changed. I didn't care two weeks ago. I didn't tell you to stop whinning, but I was shocked that the conversation about it went on for page after page after page, especially when Koya even tried to take the discussion about it to the other thread.
Were you really "shocked"?
 
Nolan Ryan pitched for 27 seasons. However, over 7% of his career walks occured in his WIS third highest salaried season. You don't want to give me the ability to choose another season for Nolan Ryan.
When I argued for this two weeks ago, I was told to "stop whining". "Rules are rules" I was told. Suddenly, after we actually complete most of the draft, everyone wants to change the rule? Where were you two weeks ago?
I don't care if the rule is changed. I didn't care two weeks ago. I didn't tell you to stop whinning, but I was shocked that the conversation about it went on for page after page after page, especially when Koya even tried to take the discussion about it to the other thread.
Were you really "shocked"?
Of course I............well............no. :bag:
 
(writing from the dallas airport terminal, making a connection)i vote no. this is r*tarded for everyone to continually be trying to make changes to the rules when they see a benefit for themselves in it.
damn harrier, I was 2 mins south of the airport having lunch today. We could have had lunch and debated our favorite deadball era players. Maybe next time. :banned:
 
Nolan Ryan pitched for 27 seasons. However, over 7% of his career walks occured in his WIS third highest salaried season. You don't want to give me the ability to choose another season for Nolan Ryan.
When I argued for this two weeks ago, I was told to "stop whining". "Rules are rules" I was told. Suddenly, after we actually complete most of the draft, everyone wants to change the rule? Where were you two weeks ago?
(writing from the dallas airport terminal, making a connection)i vote no. this is r*tarded for everyone to continually be trying to make changes to the rules when they see a benefit for themselves in it.
Harrier, I've got your picks and you'll be happy to know I wasn't looking at any of them. (Which means the picks are solid.)
 
Alight, alright, I'm picking. Busy day and I've just now gotten to a computer. If Pumpnick would have gotten online last night, this wouldn't have happened.

OF Luis Gonzalez- bio

I tried doing a writeup for someone else, then changed my mind halfway. I'm just gonna submit this pick before I change my mind.

 
Nolan Ryan pitched for 27 seasons. However, over 7% of his career walks occured in his WIS third highest salaried season. You don't want to give me the ability to choose another season for Nolan Ryan.
When I argued for this two weeks ago, I was told to "stop whining". "Rules are rules" I was told. Suddenly, after we actually complete most of the draft, everyone wants to change the rule? Where were you two weeks ago?
I think he was on your side.
 
For the record I'm not in favor of changing the rules now. I'd rather just have fun with it and see how the sim plays out. If I have to use Boyer in the sim instead of Killebrew then oh well. It'll be fun regardless.
It'll be fun, but will it be fair?I think most of us can agree that WIS.com's convoluted system of measuring salary based on innings pitched/played is absolutely ridiculous and I think we should have an option of using a lower salary if it has better stats.
 
Alight, alright, I'm picking. Busy day and I've just now gotten to a computer. If Pumpnick would have gotten online last night, this wouldn't have happened.

OF Luis Gonzalez- bio

I tried doing a writeup for someone else, then changed my mind halfway. I'm just gonna submit this pick before I change my mind.
Fairly sure this is not a legal pick.
 
Question for you math guys, if there are any here:Does it make sense to normalize ALL players to today's standards including those that already play in today's environment? That's what was done in the Normalized Database I'm using and it seems odd to me.Seems like current players are getting penalized when their stats should stay the same.Thoughts?
Bump. Someone has to have a math/stats background. Where is Pickles?
 
Seems like we're going to keep going down this road until the answer changes. I thought it was over.
No ... we never got 16 owners to give their opinions. I only recalled mrharrier's objections in the past.
 
Alight, alright, I'm picking. Busy day and I've just now gotten to a computer. If Pumpnick would have gotten online last night, this wouldn't have happened.

OF Luis Gonzalez- bio

I tried doing a writeup for someone else, then changed my mind halfway. I'm just gonna submit this pick before I change my mind.
Fairly sure this is not a legal pick.
Scratch that, I was thinking of someone else....
 
Alight, alright, I'm picking.  Busy day and I've just now gotten to a computer.  If Pumpnick would have gotten online last night, this wouldn't have happened.

OF Luis Gonzalez- bio

I tried doing a writeup for someone else, then changed my mind halfway.  I'm just gonna submit this pick before I change my mind.
Fairly sure this is not a legal pick.
Click on the bio. He played in 1990.EDIT: nevermind.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Alight, alright, I'm picking. Busy day and I've just now gotten to a computer. If Pumpnick would have gotten online last night, this wouldn't have happened.

OF Luis Gonzalez- bio

I tried doing a writeup for someone else, then changed my mind halfway. I'm just gonna submit this pick before I change my mind.
Fairly sure this is not a legal pick.
MLB debut in 1990, and his full rookie season was 1991.There is another Luis Gonzales who was a rookie in 2004.

 
STAN HACK 3B/1B

For most of the past four decades, the Cubs have been riding roughshod, but it wasn't always so. During Stan Hack's 16 years with the club, they played in four World Series, and the happy-go-lucky hot corner man was a big part of that success. He was the top lead-off batter of the 1930's, scoring at least 100 runs seven times. He was a smooth fielder, with an accurate if not shotgun arm. Stan Hack had a lifetime average of .301 and hit .348 in those World Series. He was a great bunter, and twice led the league in steals. Unlike most hitters of that era, Hack hit well to all fields. The Cubs of that era were fairly stable; first base was Charley Grimm, followed by Phil Cavaretta, both Chicago legends (Grimm managed during much of Hack's career), Billy Herman, who came up about the same time as Hack at second, Billy Jurges at short and Hack at third.

When Stan hit .352 at Sacramento in 1931, Cubs owner Bill Veeck Sr. himself went down there and signed him. By 1934 he was the Cubs' regular third baseman, where he would remain until 1943 when an unpopular old catcher named Jimmy Wilson took over the reins from Grimm. He was not only unpopular, he was also a bad manager, and after the season was over, Hack retired. But Grimm was back at the helm for '44, and he coaxed the popular Stan Hack back into playing. In '45 he had his best year, hitting .323--and helping the Cubs win their last pennant. It has been said that until Ernie Banks, Hack was the only Cub more popular than Grimm. In the early '30s this was a ballclub that liked the nightlife--Grimm, Pat Malone, Hack Wilson. As for Hack, he preferred staying at the hotel, having a few beers and talking baseball. Veeck found a way to take advantage of Grimm and his famous smile in 1935. One day he strolled through the stands, giving fans an article that had Stan¹s smile on one side, with the words "Smile With Stan Hack'' printed on it. The other side was a mirror. Soon Cub fans were shining the mirror in opposing player's faces and the umpires put an end to that! He was so popular that one player wryly commented "Stan has more friends than Leo Durocher has enemies." A great fielder, he led twice in fielding average and assists, and five times in putouts. He made the All Star teams of 1938, '39, '41, and '43. The prestigious Sporting News, the "Bible of Baseball" named him top third baseman in the majors for 1941, '42 and '43. When he retired, he had tied the record of 16 years as third baseman. He managed the Cubs without much success in the early '50s. Stan Hack died in 1979, a week after his 70th birthday.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
STRAW POLL

PROPOSED -- For the purpose of accurate simulation, each team owner may use a fourth or worse ranked season salary from Whatifsports.com for no more than four (4) players.

FOR

Doug B

Koya

Sammy

larry_boy

Kraft

lastresort66

AGAINST

Nipsey

mrharrier

Funkley

ABSTAIN

Spock

.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Suddenly, after we actually complete most of the draft, everyone wants to change the rule? Where were you (Spock) two weeks ago?
Nipsey -- there's no "suddenly" about it. I think everyone's opinion is the same as it was two weeks ago (except maybe yours? It looked like you wrote that you were arguing for this two weeks ago).Re: Koya's separate thread -- nothing at all got decided there. The current proposal I have before the owners was the last post in that thread. I felt like it was a good enough idea to at least go through the trouble of gathering everyone's opinions.

 
Suddenly, after we actually complete most of the draft, everyone wants to change the rule? Where were you (Spock) two weeks ago?
Nipsey -- there's no "suddenly" about it. I think everyone's opinion is the same as it was two weeks ago (except maybe yours? It looked like you wrote that you were arguing for this two weeks ago).Re: Koya's separate thread -- nothing at all got decided there. The current proposal I have before the owners was the last post in that thread. I felt like it was a good enough idea to at least go through the trouble of gathering everyone's opinions.
I was for it, absolutely. But I brought it up when I first realized it could be a problem and was told a rule change wasn't going to happen. Hell, UConn almost made me quit because of it! I'm just saying why didn't anyone speak up when i brought it up two weeks ago? Where were you then? I've been drafting guys in certain slots because I was told we were using the third best year and only the third best year. Capella will agree with me. To change it now because you finally see the light is unfair.
 
I'm not voting yet, I want to see how it all shakes out first.Oso can vote for UCONN.
WTF? Don't make me go back and quote some of the posts you made on page 50ish. THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN DEALT WITH LONG AGO. TO CHANGE THE RULE NOW IS UNFAIR TO THOSE OF US WHO HAVE DRAFTED ACCORDINGLY.
 
Question for you math guys, if there are any here:Does it make sense to normalize ALL players to today's standards including those that already play in today's environment? That's what was done in the Normalized Database I'm using and it seems odd to me.Seems like current players are getting penalized when their stats should stay the same.Thoughts?
Badger -- is that database trying to normalize to the early 90s, or something?If it's trying to normalize to now, then current players should absolutely not be penalized.
 
I'm just saying why didn't anyone speak up when i brought it up two weeks ago? Where were you then?
I posted that I was in favor of it then. I posted my current proposal in Koya's thread -- but it seemed no one read it.I thought UCONN was OK with going fourth-or-worse for a small number of players, just not for the whole roster?
 
I'm not voting yet, I want to see how it all shakes out first.Oso can vote for UCONN.
WTF? Don't make me go back and quote some of the posts you made on page 50ish. THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN DEALT WITH LONG AGO. TO CHANGE THE RULE NOW IS UNFAIR TO THOSE OF US WHO HAVE DRAFTED ACCORDINGLY.
:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :fishing:I don't think we can change the rules now, even if it seems right in hindsight.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top