***OFFICIAL*** FFA MLB Draft (1 Viewer)

[Kraft...]

went back and got to the point where cheating the 3 reliever rule is discussed and decided it wasn't worth it.  glad I miss some things.

UCONN - back after I took worrell, I needed to know where we stood with the rule. At least 5 or 6 times I asked Cap and the crew what defined a reliever and how we should draft. I asked, and asked and asked to ensure I would be working within the rules and not looking for any BS.Vast consensus (and no one said otherwise) was just to draft pitchers and go from there, so that is what I ended up doing - it seemed others had already drafted according to that plan.

The issue I ran into was that I drafted relievers but their third season in WhatIf was only allowing them to be used as starters(Hiller and Wiltse in my case). I considered them both relievers because their "Games started" and "Games" were signifigantly different career wise(over 100+ game difference for both guys). John and the guys over at Whatif helped me out pretty quickly with that though. Very sold customer service over there John

 

[UCONN]

went back and got to the point where cheating the 3 reliever rule is discussed and decided it wasn't worth it.  glad I miss some things.

UCONN - back after I took worrell, I needed to know where we stood with the rule. At least 5 or 6 times I asked Cap and the crew what defined a reliever and how we should draft. I asked, and asked and asked to ensure I would be working within the rules and not looking for any BS.Vast consensus (and no one said otherwise) was just to draft pitchers and go from there, so that is what I ended up doing - it seemed others had already drafted according to that plan.

The issue I ran into was that I drafted relievers but their third season in WhatIf was only allowing them to be used as starters(Hiller and Wiltse in my case). I considered them both relievers because their "Games started" and "Games" were signifigantly different(over 100+ game difference for both guys). John and the guys over at Whatif helped me out pretty quickly with that though. Very sold customer service over there John

That's a lot different than drafting 10 starters cuz you missed the closer run...

 

[Koya]

went back and got to the point where cheating the 3 reliever rule is discussed and decided it wasn't worth it.  glad I miss some things.

UCONN - back after I took worrell, I needed to know where we stood with the rule. At least 5 or 6 times I asked Cap and the crew what defined a reliever and how we should draft. I asked, and asked and asked to ensure I would be working within the rules and not looking for any BS.Vast consensus (and no one said otherwise) was just to draft pitchers and go from there, so that is what I ended up doing - it seemed others had already drafted according to that plan.

original thread said 2 relievers back when we were only going to have 5 pitchers. whatif said 3 and this was mentioned in thread (that it was 10 pitchers w/ 3 relievers). that's how I played it. could see someone mistaking that and only taking 2 "real" relievers, but less than that seems a little fishy to me. oh, well though.

UCONN - that is why I asked. 6 times. I got an answer from Cap, and that answer was draft anyone. No one objected. What more can I do. Honest. If you were there and objected I would have gone by whatever cap said - the problem was WIS had such odd rules for what constituted a reliever.

 

[Koya]

I like UCONN's enfatuation with me. Gives me a feeling of Pow-ah.

 

[UCONN]

I like UCONN's enfatuation with me. Gives me a feeling of Pow-ah.

I wasn't posting up a storm Valentine's night....

 

[Capella]

guys, won't be around a whole lot for the next week, so if somebody wants to start up the FFA vote, I can send you the seedings.

 

[UCONN]

went back and got to the point where cheating the 3 reliever rule is discussed and decided it wasn't worth it.  glad I miss some things.

UCONN - back after I took worrell, I needed to know where we stood with the rule. At least 5 or 6 times I asked Cap and the crew what defined a reliever and how we should draft. I asked, and asked and asked to ensure I would be working within the rules and not looking for any BS.Vast consensus (and no one said otherwise) was just to draft pitchers and go from there, so that is what I ended up doing - it seemed others had already drafted according to that plan.

original thread said 2 relievers back when we were only going to have 5 pitchers. whatif said 3 and this was mentioned in thread (that it was 10 pitchers w/ 3 relievers). that's how I played it. could see someone mistaking that and only taking 2 "real" relievers, but less than that seems a little fishy to me. oh, well though.

UCONN - that is why I asked. 6 times. I got an answer from Cap, and that answer was draft anyone. No one objected. What more can I do. Honest. If you were there and objected I would have gone by whatever cap said - the problem was WIS had such odd rules for what constituted a reliever.

I'm pretty sure you knew you were supposed to draft some relievers (common sense should tell you drafting all starters for a pitching "staff"=cheating). Dead issue. Off to lunch. Harrier can feel free to pick up the slack on this one for me though, .

 

[Koya]

guys, won't be around a whole lot for the next week, so if somebody wants to start up the FFA vote, I can send you the seedings.

We can hold off until next week if that works better for you, Cap.

 

[Koya]

went back and got to the point where cheating the 3 reliever rule is discussed and decided it wasn't worth it.  glad I miss some things.

UCONN - back after I took worrell, I needed to know where we stood with the rule. At least 5 or 6 times I asked Cap and the crew what defined a reliever and how we should draft. I asked, and asked and asked to ensure I would be working within the rules and not looking for any BS.Vast consensus (and no one said otherwise) was just to draft pitchers and go from there, so that is what I ended up doing - it seemed others had already drafted according to that plan.

original thread said 2 relievers back when we were only going to have 5 pitchers. whatif said 3 and this was mentioned in thread (that it was 10 pitchers w/ 3 relievers). that's how I played it. could see someone mistaking that and only taking 2 "real" relievers, but less than that seems a little fishy to me. oh, well though.

UCONN - that is why I asked. 6 times. I got an answer from Cap, and that answer was draft anyone. No one objected. What more can I do. Honest. If you were there and objected I would have gone by whatever cap said - the problem was WIS had such odd rules for what constituted a reliever.

I'm pretty sure you knew you were supposed to draft some relievers (common sense should tell you drafting all starters for a pitching "staff"=cheating). Dead issue. Off to lunch. Harrier can feel free to pick up the slack on this one for me though, .

What part of I asked 6 times do you not understand? Once again, Harrier didnt object, and you didnt object at the time. And please, after peoples stance on the 3rd year rule, what more can you ask than someone asking specifically what the rules are and then acting according to the commish's answer, when no one objected.Honestly, I think people look for issues here. PS - King King King!!!!

 

[Capella]

guys, won't be around a whole lot for the next week, so if somebody wants to start up the FFA vote, I can send you the seedings.

We can hold off until next week if that works better for you, Cap.

Probably won't be for a good week and a half/two weeks.just an FYI

 

[UCONN]

went back and got to the point where cheating the 3 reliever rule is discussed and decided it wasn't worth it.  glad I miss some things.

UCONN - back after I took worrell, I needed to know where we stood with the rule. At least 5 or 6 times I asked Cap and the crew what defined a reliever and how we should draft. I asked, and asked and asked to ensure I would be working within the rules and not looking for any BS.Vast consensus (and no one said otherwise) was just to draft pitchers and go from there, so that is what I ended up doing - it seemed others had already drafted according to that plan.

original thread said 2 relievers back when we were only going to have 5 pitchers. whatif said 3 and this was mentioned in thread (that it was 10 pitchers w/ 3 relievers). that's how I played it. could see someone mistaking that and only taking 2 "real" relievers, but less than that seems a little fishy to me. oh, well though.

UCONN - that is why I asked. 6 times. I got an answer from Cap, and that answer was draft anyone. No one objected. What more can I do. Honest. If you were there and objected I would have gone by whatever cap said - the problem was WIS had such odd rules for what constituted a reliever.

I'm pretty sure you knew you were supposed to draft some relievers (common sense should tell you drafting all starters for a pitching "staff"=cheating). Dead issue. Off to lunch. Harrier can feel free to pick up the slack on this one for me though, .

What part of I asked 6 times do you not understand? Once again, Harrier didnt object, and you didnt object at the time. And please, after peoples stance on the 3rd year rule, what more can you ask than someone asking specifically what the rules are and then acting according to the commish's answer, when no one objected.Honestly, I think people look for issues here. PS - King King King!!!!

I wasn't around for the portion of the draft I'm sure this happened in. Spin it any way you want. Pitching staff=starters and relievers. I'm sure you knew this. You "got" yourself a small edge by sliding around it. No big deal, but it's pretty obvious so no reason to try to explain it another way.

 

[Funkley]

I went into the draft with a general philosophy that I didn't want to draft a station to station then 3 run homer kind of team. Sportsman's Park also isn't the best fit for right handed sluggers. Foxx, Killebrew, Rice, Cronin, Howard.......wtf......exactly the type of offense I didn't want to create. It might end up being solid and on occasion goes off but it's not the offense I wanted. Pumpnick's offense is similar to what I would've drafted for sim purposes. Not sure how I missed the mark of my plan so badly.

 

[Koya]

went back and got to the point where cheating the 3 reliever rule is discussed and decided it wasn't worth it.  glad I miss some things.

UCONN - back after I took worrell, I needed to know where we stood with the rule. At least 5 or 6 times I asked Cap and the crew what defined a reliever and how we should draft. I asked, and asked and asked to ensure I would be working within the rules and not looking for any BS.Vast consensus (and no one said otherwise) was just to draft pitchers and go from there, so that is what I ended up doing - it seemed others had already drafted according to that plan.

original thread said 2 relievers back when we were only going to have 5 pitchers. whatif said 3 and this was mentioned in thread (that it was 10 pitchers w/ 3 relievers). that's how I played it. could see someone mistaking that and only taking 2 "real" relievers, but less than that seems a little fishy to me. oh, well though.

UCONN - that is why I asked. 6 times. I got an answer from Cap, and that answer was draft anyone. No one objected. What more can I do. Honest. If you were there and objected I would have gone by whatever cap said - the problem was WIS had such odd rules for what constituted a reliever.

I'm pretty sure you knew you were supposed to draft some relievers (common sense should tell you drafting all starters for a pitching "staff"=cheating). Dead issue. Off to lunch. Harrier can feel free to pick up the slack on this one for me though, .

What part of I asked 6 times do you not understand? Once again, Harrier didnt object, and you didnt object at the time. And please, after peoples stance on the 3rd year rule, what more can you ask than someone asking specifically what the rules are and then acting according to the commish's answer, when no one objected.Honestly, I think people look for issues here. PS - King King King!!!!

I wasn't around for the portion of the draft I'm sure this happened in. Spin it any way you want. Pitching staff=starters and relievers. I'm sure you knew this. You "got" yourself a small edge by sliding around it. No big deal, but it's pretty obvious so no reason to try to explain it another way.

UCONN - give it up. That is why I asked. Was not looking for any advantage but did not want to be at a disadvantage if everyone else was drafting differently. Honestly, it's petty when I continually ask to make sure what I do is above board, and then some whiners - who then call me a whiner - make is sound like I am trying to gain some edge. I could care less about trying to cheat a system in an online draft. If winning a sim was so important, I would just draft deadball pitchers or sim fish but that was not the point of this draft. If "winning" is that important for anyone else, and it seems to be, that is fine - it is also why I asked Cap, and repeatedly asked everyone for the rules clarifcation. Because I wanted to avoid whining just like this.

 

[Koya]

Cap - this is your gig. You put a LOT of work and effort into this. The least we can do is wait for you to get back if you want to be involved.

 

[Funkley]

Starting the FFA vote isn't critical to me.

 

[Capella]

Cap - this is your gig. You put a LOT of work and effort into this. The least we can do is wait for you to get back if you want to be involved.

 

[Capella]

I went into the draft with a general philosophy that I didn't want to draft a station to station then 3 run homer kind of team. Sportsman's Park also isn't the best fit for right handed sluggers. Foxx, Killebrew, Rice, Cronin, Howard.......wtf......exactly the type of offense I didn't want to create. It might end up being solid and on occasion goes off but it's not the offense I wanted. Pumpnick's offense is similar to what I would've drafted for sim purposes. Not sure how I missed the mark of my plan so badly.

My team is taking on water as well. Toying around with a new lineup today, D Dimaggio and Aparacio at the top, trying to get some guys on base for my only two hitters, Mays and Clemente.

 

[Sammy3469]

I went into the draft with a general philosophy that I didn't want to draft a station to station then 3 run homer kind of team. Sportsman's Park also isn't the best fit for right handed sluggers. Foxx, Killebrew, Rice, Cronin, Howard.......wtf......exactly the type of offense I didn't want to create. It might end up being solid and on occasion goes off but it's not the offense I wanted. Pumpnick's offense is similar to what I would've drafted for sim purposes. Not sure how I missed the mark of my plan so badly.

My team is taking on water as well. Toying around with a new lineup today, D Dimaggio and Aparacio at the top, trying to get some guys on base for my only two hitters, Mays and Clemente.

Don't cry Cap. Just wait for Neikro to pitch in this series. He may as well be a 200lb woman with saggy #### and a big ###. He really is a slump-buster.

 

[Koya]

Cap - this is your gig. You put a LOT of work and effort into this. The least we can do is wait for you to get back if you want to be involved.

It also gives me two more weeks to perfect the whining schtick. Working on a big case down there?

 

[Funkley]

I went into the draft with a general philosophy that I didn't want to draft a station to station then 3 run homer kind of team. Sportsman's Park also isn't the best fit for right handed sluggers. Foxx, Killebrew, Rice, Cronin, Howard.......wtf......exactly the type of offense I didn't want to create. It might end up being solid and on occasion goes off but it's not the offense I wanted. Pumpnick's offense is similar to what I would've drafted for sim purposes. Not sure how I missed the mark of my plan so badly.

My team is taking on water as well. Toying around with a new lineup today, D Dimaggio and Aparacio at the top, trying to get some guys on base for my only two hitters, Mays and Clemente.

Foxx has 3b eligibility so I've been toying with using him at 3b, Bottomley at 1b and Killer either in the OF or on the bench.

 

[UCONN]

went back and got to the point where cheating the 3 reliever rule is discussed and decided it wasn't worth it.  glad I miss some things.

UCONN - back after I took worrell, I needed to know where we stood with the rule. At least 5 or 6 times I asked Cap and the crew what defined a reliever and how we should draft. I asked, and asked and asked to ensure I would be working within the rules and not looking for any BS.Vast consensus (and no one said otherwise) was just to draft pitchers and go from there, so that is what I ended up doing - it seemed others had already drafted according to that plan.

original thread said 2 relievers back when we were only going to have 5 pitchers. whatif said 3 and this was mentioned in thread (that it was 10 pitchers w/ 3 relievers). that's how I played it. could see someone mistaking that and only taking 2 "real" relievers, but less than that seems a little fishy to me. oh, well though.

UCONN - that is why I asked. 6 times. I got an answer from Cap, and that answer was draft anyone. No one objected. What more can I do. Honest. If you were there and objected I would have gone by whatever cap said - the problem was WIS had such odd rules for what constituted a reliever.

I'm pretty sure you knew you were supposed to draft some relievers (common sense should tell you drafting all starters for a pitching "staff"=cheating). Dead issue. Off to lunch. Harrier can feel free to pick up the slack on this one for me though, .

What part of I asked 6 times do you not understand? Once again, Harrier didnt object, and you didnt object at the time. And please, after peoples stance on the 3rd year rule, what more can you ask than someone asking specifically what the rules are and then acting according to the commish's answer, when no one objected.Honestly, I think people look for issues here. PS - King King King!!!!

I wasn't around for the portion of the draft I'm sure this happened in. Spin it any way you want. Pitching staff=starters and relievers. I'm sure you knew this. You "got" yourself a small edge by sliding around it. No big deal, but it's pretty obvious so no reason to try to explain it another way.

UCONN - give it up. That is why I asked. Was not looking for any advantage but did not want to be at a disadvantage if everyone else was drafting differently. Honestly, it's petty when I continually ask to make sure what I do is above board, and then some whiners - who then call me a whiner - make is sound like I am trying to gain some edge. I could care less about trying to cheat a system in an online draft. If winning a sim was so important, I would just draft deadball pitchers or sim fish but that was not the point of this draft. If "winning" is that important for anyone else, and it seems to be, that is fine - it is also why I asked Cap, and repeatedly asked everyone for the rules clarifcation. Because I wanted to avoid whining just like this.

I like giving Koya ####. He sure can come up w/ some way to justify just about everything he does.Call A-Rod the best SS ever- "look at the numbers" reasoningCall Bonds over-rated- "look at the era" reasoningdon't jiveCall Harrier simfisherman for looking at 3rd yrs and drafting some deadballers.Call self great drafter for not picking relievers like everyone else.don't jiveNoticed this in the NBA draft. If a guy he's got has the stats he'll pump those over another guy. If his guy don't have the stats he'll find an "expert opinion" that makes it look like a good pick when his opponent has the better stats, ect. It's why I like to give him a hard time.

 

[Funkley]

6th in the league in home runs but only 13th in runs scored. I lay this at the feet of Alomar and his .204 batting average. For that matter Cobb hasn't exactly been great at .293. There has to be a correction for this down the road. Maybe more so for Cobb. The guy with the all time career batting average shouldn't hit .293.

 

[Koya]

UCONN, I dont know what you are talking about. Just because I voice my opinion, I guess you think I am one of those always looking for an upper hand. Like I said, I could care less for an upper hand in an online draft for fun, but think what you wish.Then again, you make a persuasive arguement, except for the fact that you are making most of this up.(1) I never called ARod the best SS ever. Honus Wagner is that, by a mile. If I consider ARod the best power hitting short stop ever, along with Banks in the same sentence, I dont think that is going out on much of a limb.(2) Bonds. Second best player in the history of the game. All the modern guys have somewhat inflated numbers. As with most things, I have always been consistent on this. But dont let the truth get in the way of your arguement(3) If you are going all deadballers maybe you are simfishing. For the record, simfishing is perfectly legal and fine to do. But it is also legal and fine for the rest of us to talk smack about it(4) It seems everyone else is saying that I claim my team is the best. Once again, I think my team is one of the better teams, and am confident it is top 5. I would not call it the best out there, nor have I. Most important, I never claimed to be a "good drafter" because of which pitchers I took. Ever. But again, if the truth does not support your contentions, why not just make #### up.Again, not sure why the infatuation - it only bothers me that you continually bring up mistruths and half truths to support your contentions, however. I whine and ##### plenty enough on my own to warrant justified criticism. But what you are putting forward is, simply put, bunk.Off to meetings.

 

[UCONN]

UCONN, I dont know what you are talking about. Just because I voice my opinion, I guess you think I am one of those always looking for an upper hand. Like I said, I could care less for an upper hand in an online draft for fun, but think what you wish.Then again, you make a persuasive arguement, except for the fact that you are making most of this up.(1) I never called ARod the best SS ever. Honus Wagner is that, by a mile. If I consider ARod the best power hitting short stop ever, along with Banks in the same sentence, I dont think that is going out on much of a limb.(2) Bonds. Second best player in the history of the game. All the modern guys have somewhat inflated numbers. As with most things, I have always been consistent on this. But dont let the truth get in the way of your arguement(3) If you are going all deadballers maybe you are simfishing. For the record, simfishing is perfectly legal and fine to do. But it is also legal and fine for the rest of us to talk smack about it(4) It seems everyone else is saying that I claim my team is the best. Once again, I think my team is one of the better teams, and am confident it is top 5. I would not call it the best out there, nor have I. Most important, I never claimed to be a "good drafter" because of which pitchers I took. Ever. But again, if the truth does not support your contentions, why not just make #### up.Again, not sure why the infatuation - it only bothers me that you continually bring up mistruths and half truths to support your contentions, however. I whine and ##### plenty enough on my own to warrant justified criticism. But what you are putting forward is, simply put, bunk.Off to meetings.

Lebron sucks.

 

[Doug B]

6th in the league in home runs but only 13th in runs scored. I lay this at the feet of Alomar and his .204 batting average. For that matter Cobb hasn't exactly been great at .293. There has to be a correction for this down the road. Maybe more so for Cobb. The guy with the all time career batting average shouldn't hit .293.

Are all the pre-1920's hitters struggling? Jesse Burkett, on my team, was a .410 hitter. Right now, he's about .130 below that.I could see if these guys were taking a hit because of the pitching quality. But then why are some of my 80s hitters like Brett and Trammell hitting 50 points ABOVE their average?I guess it will all shake out sooner or later.

 

[UCONN]

also that arguement holds true in spirit. atleast a guy like Harrier comes in and views most players objectively (I like looking for sabermetric stats type arguement) where as you constantly pimp (and criticize other guys) your guys using different standards. For the guys w/out the numbers it is what some sportswriter said or their "potential". For the guys w/ the numbers it's a side-by-side statistical comparison. One of your guys has a short career and he had a brilliant peak...somebody elses does and "their all-time numbers" don't stack up, ect. This part of it is very true and actually serious on my part.edited to add and yeah we all pimp our teams...you just stick out to me as doing it in a less objective way than anybody else. i'm sure "Lebrongate" has something to do w/ me having that impression....

 

[Doug B]

Anybody talkin' baseball in this thread?

 

[larry_boy_44]

Anybody talkin' baseball in this thread?

no... now go away before you ruin it and start talking about baseball... :rotflmao:

 

[UCONN]

Anybody talkin' baseball in this thread?

King Kelley is really good. He has my MVP vote. 9 steals already to go along w/ his monster stats at the plate. He's a real team leader from what I've heard as well. Very respected in the clubhouse.

 

[Nipsey]

Koya,You're getting here.-Nipsey

 

[larry_boy_44]

Anybody talkin' baseball in this thread?

King Kelley is really good. He has my MVP vote. 9 steals already to go along w/ his monster stats at the plate. He's a real team leader from what I've heard as well. Very respected in the clubhouse.

:rotflmao: yeah, 'cuz none of our teams have team leaders... nah...

 

[UCONN]

Koya,You're getting here.-Nipsey

 

[UCONN]

Anybody talkin' baseball in this thread?

King Kelley is really good. He has my MVP vote. 9 steals already to go along w/ his monster stats at the plate. He's a real team leader from what I've heard as well. Very respected in the clubhouse.

:rotflmao: yeah, 'cuz none of our teams have team leaders... nah...

Mickey is dragging my team down. Jackie Robinson+nightlife=not good. I'd really like to trade for King if that were allowed...

 

[larry_boy_44]

Anybody talkin' baseball in this thread?

King Kelley is really good. He has my MVP vote. 9 steals already to go along w/ his monster stats at the plate. He's a real team leader from what I've heard as well. Very respected in the clubhouse.

:rotflmao: yeah, 'cuz none of our teams have team leaders... nah...

Mickey is dragging my team down. Jackie Robinson+nightlife=not good. I'd really like to trade for King if that were allowed...

seriously... when did UCONN become Nipsey's #####???

 

[UCONN]

Anybody talkin' baseball in this thread?

King Kelley is really good. He has my MVP vote. 9 steals already to go along w/ his monster stats at the plate. He's a real team leader from what I've heard as well. Very respected in the clubhouse.

:rotflmao: yeah, 'cuz none of our teams have team leaders... nah...

Mickey is dragging my team down. Jackie Robinson+nightlife=not good. I'd really like to trade for King if that were allowed...

seriously... when did UCONN become Nipsey's #####???

at the "Dragons, Arks, and Lebron" believers convention...

 

[larry_boy_44]

Anybody talkin' baseball in this thread?

King Kelley is really good. He has my MVP vote. 9 steals already to go along w/ his monster stats at the plate. He's a real team leader from what I've heard as well. Very respected in the clubhouse.

:rotflmao: yeah, 'cuz none of our teams have team leaders... nah...

Mickey is dragging my team down. Jackie Robinson+nightlife=not good. I'd really like to trade for King if that were allowed...

seriously... when did UCONN become Nipsey's #####???

at the "Dragons, Arks, and Lebron" believers convention...

so now your gay and together?I guess that answers questions about ya'll... :rotflmao:

 

[Mr. Pickles]

Koya,You're getting here.-Nipsey

Gotta agree here.

 

[UCONN]

Anybody talkin' baseball in this thread?

King Kelley is really good. He has my MVP vote. 9 steals already to go along w/ his monster stats at the plate. He's a real team leader from what I've heard as well. Very respected in the clubhouse.

:rotflmao: yeah, 'cuz none of our teams have team leaders... nah...

Mickey is dragging my team down. Jackie Robinson+nightlife=not good. I'd really like to trade for King if that were allowed...

seriously... when did UCONN become Nipsey's #####???

at the "Dragons, Arks, and Lebron" believers convention...

so now your gay and together?I guess that answers questions about ya'll... :rotflmao:

No. I discussed agnosticism. He discussed how bad Lebron sucks. We laughed at everybody else and then ate chicken wings and drank beer. It was a good time. Also, my respect for King Kelley is totally un-related to any regards for Nipsey. That guy was great pure and simple.

 

[Capella]

I think larry is high.

 

[Funkley]

Larry has a little good fortune in the sim and now he's all puffed up and talking ####. Interesting development. My money's on Nipsey and UCONN.

 

[larry_boy_44]

Anybody talkin' baseball in this thread?

King Kelley is really good. He has my MVP vote. 9 steals already to go along w/ his monster stats at the plate. He's a real team leader from what I've heard as well. Very respected in the clubhouse.

:rotflmao: yeah, 'cuz none of our teams have team leaders... nah...

Mickey is dragging my team down. Jackie Robinson+nightlife=not good. I'd really like to trade for King if that were allowed...

seriously... when did UCONN become Nipsey's #####???

at the "Dragons, Arks, and Lebron" believers convention...

so now your gay and together?I guess that answers questions about ya'll... :rotflmao:

No. I discussed agnosticism. He discussed how bad Lebron sucks. We laughed at everybody else and then ate chicken wings and drank beer. It was a good time. Also, my respect for King Kelley is totally un-related to any regards for Nipsey. That guy was great pure and simple.

so now your in denial... we all can tell, UCONN, stop being delusional and just admit it... its ok, whether we think its right or wrong personally, it is your life and if you choose to be with Nipsey, that is your decision...

 

[Capella]

Anybody talkin' baseball in this thread?

King Kelley is really good. He has my MVP vote. 9 steals already to go along w/ his monster stats at the plate. He's a real team leader from what I've heard as well. Very respected in the clubhouse.

:rotflmao: yeah, 'cuz none of our teams have team leaders... nah...

Mickey is dragging my team down. Jackie Robinson+nightlife=not good. I'd really like to trade for King if that were allowed...

seriously... when did UCONN become Nipsey's #####???

at the "Dragons, Arks, and Lebron" believers convention...

so now your gay and together?I guess that answers questions about ya'll... :rotflmao:

No. I discussed agnosticism. He discussed how bad Lebron sucks. We laughed at everybody else and then ate chicken wings and drank beer. It was a good time. Also, my respect for King Kelley is totally un-related to any regards for Nipsey. That guy was great pure and simple.

so now your in denial... we all can tell, UCONN, stop being delusional and just admit it... its ok, whether we think its right or wrong personally, it is your life and if you choose to be with Nipsey, that is your decision...

 

[Kraft...]

Larry you and me tomorrow, my boys are pretty pissed after getting shutout 3 in a row in the Pump series. (Damn live games screwed me! How is it possible that Walter Johnson can pitch 8 2/3 innings of shutout ball then come back on vertually one day of rest and pitch 8 more innings of Shutout Ball , damn you Pump)

 

[UCONN]

Anybody talkin' baseball in this thread?

King Kelley is really good. He has my MVP vote. 9 steals already to go along w/ his monster stats at the plate. He's a real team leader from what I've heard as well. Very respected in the clubhouse.

:rotflmao: yeah, 'cuz none of our teams have team leaders... nah...

Mickey is dragging my team down. Jackie Robinson+nightlife=not good. I'd really like to trade for King if that were allowed...

seriously... when did UCONN become Nipsey's #####???

at the "Dragons, Arks, and Lebron" believers convention...

so now your gay and together?I guess that answers questions about ya'll... :rotflmao:

No. I discussed agnosticism. He discussed how bad Lebron sucks. We laughed at everybody else and then ate chicken wings and drank beer. It was a good time. Also, my respect for King Kelley is totally un-related to any regards for Nipsey. That guy was great pure and simple.

so now your in denial... we all can tell, UCONN, stop being delusional and just admit it... its ok, whether we think its right or wrong personally, it is your life and if you choose to be with Nipsey, that is your decision...

refer to Cappy and Funkley's posts. take head LB. I'll soon come out w/ guns blazing.

 

[UCONN]

Anybody talkin' baseball in this thread?

King Kelley is really good. He has my MVP vote. 9 steals already to go along w/ his monster stats at the plate. He's a real team leader from what I've heard as well. Very respected in the clubhouse.

:rotflmao: yeah, 'cuz none of our teams have team leaders... nah...

Mickey is dragging my team down. Jackie Robinson+nightlife=not good. I'd really like to trade for King if that were allowed...

seriously... when did UCONN become Nipsey's #####???

at the "Dragons, Arks, and Lebron" believers convention...

so now your gay and together?I guess that answers questions about ya'll... :rotflmao:

No. I discussed agnosticism. He discussed how bad Lebron sucks. We laughed at everybody else and then ate chicken wings and drank beer. It was a good time. Also, my respect for King Kelley is totally un-related to any regards for Nipsey. That guy was great pure and simple.

so now your in denial... we all can tell, UCONN, stop being delusional and just admit it... its ok, whether we think its right or wrong personally, it is your life and if you choose to be with Nipsey, that is your decision...

Male homosexuality repulses me. Dragons were not real. Lebron is not a savior. My wife will be happier than yours (though that submissiveness thing might have its advantages).

 

[larry_boy_44]

Anybody talkin' baseball in this thread?

King Kelley is really good. He has my MVP vote. 9 steals already to go along w/ his monster stats at the plate. He's a real team leader from what I've heard as well. Very respected in the clubhouse.

:rotflmao: yeah, 'cuz none of our teams have team leaders... nah...

Mickey is dragging my team down. Jackie Robinson+nightlife=not good. I'd really like to trade for King if that were allowed...

seriously... when did UCONN become Nipsey's #####???

at the "Dragons, Arks, and Lebron" believers convention...

so now your gay and together?I guess that answers questions about ya'll... :rotflmao:

No. I discussed agnosticism. He discussed how bad Lebron sucks. We laughed at everybody else and then ate chicken wings and drank beer. It was a good time. Also, my respect for King Kelley is totally un-related to any regards for Nipsey. That guy was great pure and simple.

so now your in denial... we all can tell, UCONN, stop being delusional and just admit it... its ok, whether we think its right or wrong personally, it is your life and if you choose to be with Nipsey, that is your decision...

refer to Cappy and Funkley's posts. take head LB. I'll soon come out w/ guns blazing.

2 words for you UCONN: "Freudian" and "slip"repeat what you just wrote out loud to yourself...

 

[Nipsey]

Anybody talkin' baseball in this thread?

King Kelley is really good. He has my MVP vote. 9 steals already to go along w/ his monster stats at the plate. He's a real team leader from what I've heard as well. Very respected in the clubhouse.

:rotflmao: yeah, 'cuz none of our teams have team leaders... nah...

Mickey is dragging my team down. Jackie Robinson+nightlife=not good. I'd really like to trade for King if that were allowed...

seriously... when did UCONN become Nipsey's #####???

Oh my goodness! Larry Boy! Did you just swear?!?! I'm speechless.Next thing you know you'll be going to the Seven-11 to buy a sixer of Natural light and the latest "Barely Legal".

 

[Capella]

I have no idea what the #### larry is talking about in here.This thread is passing me by.

 

[Capella]

Anybody talkin' baseball in this thread?

King Kelley is really good. He has my MVP vote. 9 steals already to go along w/ his monster stats at the plate. He's a real team leader from what I've heard as well. Very respected in the clubhouse.

:rotflmao: yeah, 'cuz none of our teams have team leaders... nah...

Mickey is dragging my team down. Jackie Robinson+nightlife=not good. I'd really like to trade for King if that were allowed...

seriously... when did UCONN become Nipsey's #####???

Oh my goodness! Larry Boy! Did you just swear?!?! I'm speechless.Next thing you know you'll be going to the Seven-11 to buy a sixer of Natural light and the latest "Barely Legal".

I was wondering that too.Maybe larry is coming to the dark side.

 

[UCONN]

I have no idea what the #### larry is talking about in here.This thread is passing me by.

:rotflmao: