***OFFICIAL*** FFA MLB Draft (2 Viewers)

[Notorious T.R.E.]

1. Quantrill, Paul 1995 Philadelphia Phillies R 202 4.67 11-12 0 1.43 .283 2.21 5.17 1.00 $5,038,8482. Quantrill, Paul 1993 Boston Red Sox R 138 3.91 6-12 1 1.41 .267 2.87 4.30 0.85 $3,469,8393. Quantrill, Paul 2003 Los Angeles Dodgers R 77 1.75 2-5 1 0.98 .208 1.75 5.12 0.23 $2,950,864

Thanks LB. If you honestly drafted him based on 4 "sim worthy" seasons and not his career you sim-fished. No two ways about it. Legal, but that is what you did.

LB - you're luck you're not within lynching range...

 

[Politician Spock]

Lost to Larry BOY in 11 innings.  Quantrill pitched 2 scoreless.  I wonder if a member of the Quantrill family works for WIS.com?

and you scored 3 off Smoltz in 1/3, the first runs scored on him this year...quit whining, your lucky it wasn't 5-2 after 9...

I wan't whining. Its just a game to me big guy.Quantrill has been incredible thus far. I hope he falls to earth, but only time will tell.

doubt it... Quantrill's sim season: 2003 34 LAD NL 2 5 89 0 0 0 21 1 77.3 61 18 15 2 15 44 3 0 291 1.75 4.03 231whip a little under 1, ERA of 1.75, 1 save, 89 games, a 231 adjusted ERA...he isn't gonna come down any time soon...

So not only did you draft Paul Quantrill, but you used his 2nd best season? Ridiculous. You're a cheat. Name Team T IP/162 ERA W-L S WHIP OAV BB/9 K/9 HR/9 Salary 1. Quantrill, Paul 1993 Boston Red Sox R 138 3.91 6-12 1 1.41 .267 2.87 4.30 0.85 $3,469,839 2. Quantrill, Paul 2003 Los Angeles Dodgers R 77 1.75 2-5 1 0.98 .208 1.75 5.12 0.23 $2,950,864 3. Quantrill, Paul 2001 Toronto Blue Jays R 83 3.04 11-2 2 1.18 .257 1.30 6.29 0.65 $2,786,696 4. Quantrill, Paul 1997 Toronto Blue Jays R 88 1.94 6-7 5 1.36 .281 1.74 5.73 0.51 $2,608,282

wrong...1. Quantrill, Paul 1995 Philadelphia Phillies R 202 4.67 11-12 0 1.43 .283 2.21 5.17 1.00 $5,038,8482. Quantrill, Paul 1993 Boston Red Sox R 138 3.91 6-12 1 1.41 .267 2.87 4.30 0.85 $3,469,8393. Quantrill, Paul 2003 Los Angeles Dodgers R 77 1.75 2-5 1 0.98 .208 1.75 5.12 0.23 $2,950,8644. Quantrill, Paul 2001 Toronto Blue Jays R 83 3.04 11-2 2 1.18 .257 1.30 6.29 0.65 $2,786,6965. Quantrill, Paul 1997 Toronto Blue Jays R 88 1.94 6-7 5 1.36 .281 1.74 5.73 0.51 $2,608,2826. Quantrill, Paul 1996 Toronto Blue Jays R 134 5.43 5-14 0 1.66 .299 3.42 5.76 1.81 $2,559,8187. Quantrill, Paul 1998 Toronto Blue Jays R 80 2.59 3-4 7 1.38 .268 2.48 6.64 0.56 $2,422,8058. Quantrill, Paul 2002 Los Angeles Dodgers R 76 2.72 5-4 1 1.38 .259 2.95 6.26 0.12 $2,185,0589. Quantrill, Paul 2004 New York Yankees R 95 4.72 7-3 1 1.51 .303 1.89 3.49 0.47 $2,065,00810. Quantrill, Paul 2000 Toronto Blue Jays R 84 4.52 2-5 1 1.49 .285 2.69 5.06 0.75 $1,968,33411. Quantrill, Paul 1994 Philadelphia Phillies R 75 4.92 3-3 1 1.49 .287 2.55 4.75 1.19 $1,718,99812. Quantrill, Paul 1994 Boston Red Sox R 75 4.92 3-3 1 1.49 .287 2.55 4.75 1.19 $1,718,99813. Quantrill, Paul 1992 Boston Red Sox R 49 2.19 2-3 1 1.42 .271 2.74 4.38 0.18 $1,301,50514. Quantrill, Paul 1999 Toronto Blue Jays R 49 3.33 3-2 0 1.44 .266 3.14 5.18 0.92 $1,239,28115. Quantrill, Paul 1994 Philadelphia Phillies R 42 6.00 2-2 1 1.63 .302 3.00 3.90 0.90 $771,692

I thought we were using the Dennis Eckersly rule that you ignore the starter years.

Only if you want to. That is the one thing we got flexibility on. If you want to dump the starter (high IP) seasons you can to get the more dominant (w/ less IP) reliever #'s but only if you take his 3rd best reliever year. If his 3rd best overall year is what you want that is fine too.

So if Dennis Eckersley had only two years as a starter, we could have drafted him and used the most dominant season ever accomplished by a reliever, because that would have been his 3rd highest salary? Hmmm.... I wonder how many other relievers like Quantrill were missed.

 

[Nipsey]

Lost to Larry BOY in 11 innings.  Quantrill pitched 2 scoreless. 

I wonder if a member of the Quantrill family works for WIS.com?

and you scored 3 off Smoltz in 1/3, the first runs scored on him this year...quit whining, your lucky it wasn't 5-2 after 9...

I wan't whining. Its just a game to me big guy.Quantrill has been incredible thus far. I hope he falls to earth, but only time will tell.

doubt it... Quantrill's sim season:2003 34 LAD NL 2 5 89 0 0 0 21 1 77.3 61 18 15 2 15 44 3 0 291 1.75 4.03 231

whip a little under 1, ERA of 1.75, 1 save, 89 games, a 231 adjusted ERA...

he isn't gonna come down any time soon...

So not only did you draft Paul Quantrill, but you used his 2nd best season? Ridiculous. You're a cheat.Name Team T IP/162 ERA W-L S WHIP OAV BB/9 K/9 HR/9 Salary

1. Quantrill, Paul 1993 Boston Red Sox R 138 3.91 6-12 1 1.41 .267 2.87 4.30 0.85 $3,469,839

2. Quantrill, Paul 2003 Los Angeles Dodgers R 77 1.75 2-5 1 0.98 .208 1.75 5.12 0.23 $2,950,864

3. Quantrill, Paul 2001 Toronto Blue Jays R 83 3.04 11-2 2 1.18 .257 1.30 6.29 0.65 $2,786,696

4. Quantrill, Paul 1997 Toronto Blue Jays R 88 1.94 6-7 5 1.36 .281 1.74 5.73 0.51 $2,608,282

wrong...1. Quantrill, Paul 1995 Philadelphia Phillies R 202 4.67 11-12 0 1.43 .283 2.21 5.17 1.00 $5,038,848

2. Quantrill, Paul 1993 Boston Red Sox R 138 3.91 6-12 1 1.41 .267 2.87 4.30 0.85 $3,469,839

3. Quantrill, Paul 2003 Los Angeles Dodgers R 77 1.75 2-5 1 0.98 .208 1.75 5.12 0.23 $2,950,864

4. Quantrill, Paul 2001 Toronto Blue Jays R 83 3.04 11-2 2 1.18 .257 1.30 6.29 0.65 $2,786,696

5. Quantrill, Paul 1997 Toronto Blue Jays R 88 1.94 6-7 5 1.36 .281 1.74 5.73 0.51 $2,608,282

6. Quantrill, Paul 1996 Toronto Blue Jays R 134 5.43 5-14 0 1.66 .299 3.42 5.76 1.81 $2,559,818

7. Quantrill, Paul 1998 Toronto Blue Jays R 80 2.59 3-4 7 1.38 .268 2.48 6.64 0.56 $2,422,805

8. Quantrill, Paul 2002 Los Angeles Dodgers R 76 2.72 5-4 1 1.38 .259 2.95 6.26 0.12 $2,185,058

9. Quantrill, Paul 2004 New York Yankees R 95 4.72 7-3 1 1.51 .303 1.89 3.49 0.47 $2,065,008

10. Quantrill, Paul 2000 Toronto Blue Jays R 84 4.52 2-5 1 1.49 .285 2.69 5.06 0.75 $1,968,334

11. Quantrill, Paul 1994 Philadelphia Phillies R 75 4.92 3-3 1 1.49 .287 2.55 4.75 1.19 $1,718,998

12. Quantrill, Paul 1994 Boston Red Sox R 75 4.92 3-3 1 1.49 .287 2.55 4.75 1.19 $1,718,998

13. Quantrill, Paul 1992 Boston Red Sox R 49 2.19 2-3 1 1.42 .271 2.74 4.38 0.18 $1,301,505

14. Quantrill, Paul 1999 Toronto Blue Jays R 49 3.33 3-2 0 1.44 .266 3.14 5.18 0.92 $1,239,281

15. Quantrill, Paul 1994 Philadelphia Phillies R 42 6.00 2-2 1 1.63 .302 3.00 3.90 0.90 $771,692

I thought we were using the Dennis Eckersly rule that you ignore the starter years.

Only if you want to. That is the one thing we got flexibility on. If you want to dump the starter (high IP) seasons you can to get the more dominant (w/ less IP) reliever #'s but only if you take his 3rd best reliever year. If his 3rd best overall year is what you want that is fine too.

So if Dennis Eckersley had only two years as a starter, we could have drafted him and used the most dominant season ever accomplished by a reliever, because that would have been his 3rd highest salary? Hmmm.... I wonder how many other relievers like Quantrill were missed.

I took Ecks third best reliever season. Not third best season overall.

 

[larry_boy_44]

Lost to Larry BOY in 11 innings. Quantrill pitched 2 scoreless. I wonder if a member of the Quantrill family works for WIS.com?

and you scored 3 off Smoltz in 1/3, the first runs scored on him this year...quit whining, your lucky it wasn't 5-2 after 9...

I wan't whining. Its just a game to me big guy.Quantrill has been incredible thus far. I hope he falls to earth, but only time will tell.

doubt it... Quantrill's sim season: 2003 34 LAD NL 2 5 89 0 0 0 21 1 77.3 61 18 15 2 15 44 3 0 291 1.75 4.03 231whip a little under 1, ERA of 1.75, 1 save, 89 games, a 231 adjusted ERA...he isn't gonna come down any time soon...

So not only did you draft Paul Quantrill, but you used his 2nd best season? Ridiculous. You're a cheat. Name Team T IP/162 ERA W-L S WHIP OAV BB/9 K/9 HR/9 Salary 1. Quantrill, Paul 1993 Boston Red Sox R 138 3.91 6-12 1 1.41 .267 2.87 4.30 0.85 $3,469,839 2. Quantrill, Paul 2003 Los Angeles Dodgers R 77 1.75 2-5 1 0.98 .208 1.75 5.12 0.23 $2,950,864 3. Quantrill, Paul 2001 Toronto Blue Jays R 83 3.04 11-2 2 1.18 .257 1.30 6.29 0.65 $2,786,696 4. Quantrill, Paul 1997 Toronto Blue Jays R 88 1.94 6-7 5 1.36 .281 1.74 5.73 0.51 $2,608,282

wrong...1. Quantrill, Paul 1995 Philadelphia Phillies R 202 4.67 11-12 0 1.43 .283 2.21 5.17 1.00 $5,038,8482. Quantrill, Paul 1993 Boston Red Sox R 138 3.91 6-12 1 1.41 .267 2.87 4.30 0.85 $3,469,8393. Quantrill, Paul 2003 Los Angeles Dodgers R 77 1.75 2-5 1 0.98 .208 1.75 5.12 0.23 $2,950,8644. Quantrill, Paul 2001 Toronto Blue Jays R 83 3.04 11-2 2 1.18 .257 1.30 6.29 0.65 $2,786,6965. Quantrill, Paul 1997 Toronto Blue Jays R 88 1.94 6-7 5 1.36 .281 1.74 5.73 0.51 $2,608,2826. Quantrill, Paul 1996 Toronto Blue Jays R 134 5.43 5-14 0 1.66 .299 3.42 5.76 1.81 $2,559,8187. Quantrill, Paul 1998 Toronto Blue Jays R 80 2.59 3-4 7 1.38 .268 2.48 6.64 0.56 $2,422,8058. Quantrill, Paul 2002 Los Angeles Dodgers R 76 2.72 5-4 1 1.38 .259 2.95 6.26 0.12 $2,185,0589. Quantrill, Paul 2004 New York Yankees R 95 4.72 7-3 1 1.51 .303 1.89 3.49 0.47 $2,065,00810. Quantrill, Paul 2000 Toronto Blue Jays R 84 4.52 2-5 1 1.49 .285 2.69 5.06 0.75 $1,968,33411. Quantrill, Paul 1994 Philadelphia Phillies R 75 4.92 3-3 1 1.49 .287 2.55 4.75 1.19 $1,718,99812. Quantrill, Paul 1994 Boston Red Sox R 75 4.92 3-3 1 1.49 .287 2.55 4.75 1.19 $1,718,99813. Quantrill, Paul 1992 Boston Red Sox R 49 2.19 2-3 1 1.42 .271 2.74 4.38 0.18 $1,301,50514. Quantrill, Paul 1999 Toronto Blue Jays R 49 3.33 3-2 0 1.44 .266 3.14 5.18 0.92 $1,239,28115. Quantrill, Paul 1994 Philadelphia Phillies R 42 6.00 2-2 1 1.63 .302 3.00 3.90 0.90 $771,692

I thought we were using the Dennis Eckersly rule that you ignore the starter years.

Only if you want to. That is the one thing we got flexibility on. If you want to dump the starter (high IP) seasons you can to get the more dominant (w/ less IP) reliever #'s but only if you take his 3rd best reliever year. If his 3rd best overall year is what you want that is fine too.

So if Dennis Eckersley had only two years as a starter, we could have drafted him and used the most dominant season ever accomplished by a reliever, because that would have been his 3rd highest salary? Hmmm.... I wonder how many other relievers like Quantrill were missed.

Quantrill only had 1 year as a pure starter...The year I used was #2 in the RP area, #3 in the SP/RP area...

 

[Politician Spock]

Lost to Larry BOY in 11 innings.  Quantrill pitched 2 scoreless. 

I wonder if a member of the Quantrill family works for WIS.com?

and you scored 3 off Smoltz in 1/3, the first runs scored on him this year...quit whining, your lucky it wasn't 5-2 after 9...

I wan't whining. Its just a game to me big guy.Quantrill has been incredible thus far. I hope he falls to earth, but only time will tell.

doubt it... Quantrill's sim season:2003 34 LAD NL 2 5 89 0 0 0 21 1 77.3 61 18 15 2 15 44 3 0 291 1.75 4.03 231

whip a little under 1, ERA of 1.75, 1 save, 89 games, a 231 adjusted ERA...

he isn't gonna come down any time soon...

So not only did you draft Paul Quantrill, but you used his 2nd best season? Ridiculous. You're a cheat.Name Team T IP/162 ERA W-L S WHIP OAV BB/9 K/9 HR/9 Salary

1. Quantrill, Paul 1993 Boston Red Sox R 138 3.91 6-12 1 1.41 .267 2.87 4.30 0.85 $3,469,839

2. Quantrill, Paul 2003 Los Angeles Dodgers R 77 1.75 2-5 1 0.98 .208 1.75 5.12 0.23 $2,950,864

3. Quantrill, Paul 2001 Toronto Blue Jays R 83 3.04 11-2 2 1.18 .257 1.30 6.29 0.65 $2,786,696

4. Quantrill, Paul 1997 Toronto Blue Jays R 88 1.94 6-7 5 1.36 .281 1.74 5.73 0.51 $2,608,282

wrong...1. Quantrill, Paul 1995 Philadelphia Phillies R 202 4.67 11-12 0 1.43 .283 2.21 5.17 1.00 $5,038,848

2. Quantrill, Paul 1993 Boston Red Sox R 138 3.91 6-12 1 1.41 .267 2.87 4.30 0.85 $3,469,839

3. Quantrill, Paul 2003 Los Angeles Dodgers R 77 1.75 2-5 1 0.98 .208 1.75 5.12 0.23 $2,950,864

4. Quantrill, Paul 2001 Toronto Blue Jays R 83 3.04 11-2 2 1.18 .257 1.30 6.29 0.65 $2,786,696

5. Quantrill, Paul 1997 Toronto Blue Jays R 88 1.94 6-7 5 1.36 .281 1.74 5.73 0.51 $2,608,282

6. Quantrill, Paul 1996 Toronto Blue Jays R 134 5.43 5-14 0 1.66 .299 3.42 5.76 1.81 $2,559,818

7. Quantrill, Paul 1998 Toronto Blue Jays R 80 2.59 3-4 7 1.38 .268 2.48 6.64 0.56 $2,422,805

8. Quantrill, Paul 2002 Los Angeles Dodgers R 76 2.72 5-4 1 1.38 .259 2.95 6.26 0.12 $2,185,058

9. Quantrill, Paul 2004 New York Yankees R 95 4.72 7-3 1 1.51 .303 1.89 3.49 0.47 $2,065,008

10. Quantrill, Paul 2000 Toronto Blue Jays R 84 4.52 2-5 1 1.49 .285 2.69 5.06 0.75 $1,968,334

11. Quantrill, Paul 1994 Philadelphia Phillies R 75 4.92 3-3 1 1.49 .287 2.55 4.75 1.19 $1,718,998

12. Quantrill, Paul 1994 Boston Red Sox R 75 4.92 3-3 1 1.49 .287 2.55 4.75 1.19 $1,718,998

13. Quantrill, Paul 1992 Boston Red Sox R 49 2.19 2-3 1 1.42 .271 2.74 4.38 0.18 $1,301,505

14. Quantrill, Paul 1999 Toronto Blue Jays R 49 3.33 3-2 0 1.44 .266 3.14 5.18 0.92 $1,239,281

15. Quantrill, Paul 1994 Philadelphia Phillies R 42 6.00 2-2 1 1.63 .302 3.00 3.90 0.90 $771,692

I thought we were using the Dennis Eckersly rule that you ignore the starter years.

Only if you want to. That is the one thing we got flexibility on. If you want to dump the starter (high IP) seasons you can to get the more dominant (w/ less IP) reliever #'s but only if you take his 3rd best reliever year. If his 3rd best overall year is what you want that is fine too.

So if Dennis Eckersley had only two years as a starter, we could have drafted him and used the most dominant season ever accomplished by a reliever, because that would have been his 3rd highest salary? Hmmm.... I wonder how many other relievers like Quantrill were missed.

I took Ecks third best reliever season. Not third best season overall.

Larryboy didn't take Quantrill's 3rd best reliever season. That's my point. If a guy had two seasons as a starter, you'd be able to use the season in which he had his best season ever as a reliever.

 

[UCONN]

Lost to Larry BOY in 11 innings.  Quantrill pitched 2 scoreless. 

I wonder if a member of the Quantrill family works for WIS.com?

and you scored 3 off Smoltz in 1/3, the first runs scored on him this year...quit whining, your lucky it wasn't 5-2 after 9...

I wan't whining. Its just a game to me big guy.Quantrill has been incredible thus far. I hope he falls to earth, but only time will tell.

doubt it... Quantrill's sim season:2003 34 LAD NL 2 5 89 0 0 0 21 1 77.3 61 18 15 2 15 44 3 0 291 1.75 4.03 231

whip a little under 1, ERA of 1.75, 1 save, 89 games, a 231 adjusted ERA...

he isn't gonna come down any time soon...

So not only did you draft Paul Quantrill, but you used his 2nd best season? Ridiculous. You're a cheat.Name Team T IP/162 ERA W-L S WHIP OAV BB/9 K/9 HR/9 Salary

1. Quantrill, Paul 1993 Boston Red Sox R 138 3.91 6-12 1 1.41 .267 2.87 4.30 0.85 $3,469,839

2. Quantrill, Paul 2003 Los Angeles Dodgers R 77 1.75 2-5 1 0.98 .208 1.75 5.12 0.23 $2,950,864

3. Quantrill, Paul 2001 Toronto Blue Jays R 83 3.04 11-2 2 1.18 .257 1.30 6.29 0.65 $2,786,696

4. Quantrill, Paul 1997 Toronto Blue Jays R 88 1.94 6-7 5 1.36 .281 1.74 5.73 0.51 $2,608,282

wrong...1. Quantrill, Paul 1995 Philadelphia Phillies R 202 4.67 11-12 0 1.43 .283 2.21 5.17 1.00 $5,038,848

2. Quantrill, Paul 1993 Boston Red Sox R 138 3.91 6-12 1 1.41 .267 2.87 4.30 0.85 $3,469,839

3. Quantrill, Paul 2003 Los Angeles Dodgers R 77 1.75 2-5 1 0.98 .208 1.75 5.12 0.23 $2,950,864

4. Quantrill, Paul 2001 Toronto Blue Jays R 83 3.04 11-2 2 1.18 .257 1.30 6.29 0.65 $2,786,696

5. Quantrill, Paul 1997 Toronto Blue Jays R 88 1.94 6-7 5 1.36 .281 1.74 5.73 0.51 $2,608,282

6. Quantrill, Paul 1996 Toronto Blue Jays R 134 5.43 5-14 0 1.66 .299 3.42 5.76 1.81 $2,559,818

7. Quantrill, Paul 1998 Toronto Blue Jays R 80 2.59 3-4 7 1.38 .268 2.48 6.64 0.56 $2,422,805

8. Quantrill, Paul 2002 Los Angeles Dodgers R 76 2.72 5-4 1 1.38 .259 2.95 6.26 0.12 $2,185,058

9. Quantrill, Paul 2004 New York Yankees R 95 4.72 7-3 1 1.51 .303 1.89 3.49 0.47 $2,065,008

10. Quantrill, Paul 2000 Toronto Blue Jays R 84 4.52 2-5 1 1.49 .285 2.69 5.06 0.75 $1,968,334

11. Quantrill, Paul 1994 Philadelphia Phillies R 75 4.92 3-3 1 1.49 .287 2.55 4.75 1.19 $1,718,998

12. Quantrill, Paul 1994 Boston Red Sox R 75 4.92 3-3 1 1.49 .287 2.55 4.75 1.19 $1,718,998

13. Quantrill, Paul 1992 Boston Red Sox R 49 2.19 2-3 1 1.42 .271 2.74 4.38 0.18 $1,301,505

14. Quantrill, Paul 1999 Toronto Blue Jays R 49 3.33 3-2 0 1.44 .266 3.14 5.18 0.92 $1,239,281

15. Quantrill, Paul 1994 Philadelphia Phillies R 42 6.00 2-2 1 1.63 .302 3.00 3.90 0.90 $771,692

I thought we were using the Dennis Eckersly rule that you ignore the starter years.

Only if you want to. That is the one thing we got flexibility on. If you want to dump the starter (high IP) seasons you can to get the more dominant (w/ less IP) reliever #'s but only if you take his 3rd best reliever year. If his 3rd best overall year is what you want that is fine too.

So if Dennis Eckersley had only two years as a starter, we could have drafted him and used the most dominant season ever accomplished by a reliever, because that would have been his 3rd highest salary? Hmmm.... I wonder how many other relievers like Quantrill were missed.

I took Ecks third best reliever season. Not third best season overall.

you could have took his third best overall. what you couldn't have done is said, "his 4th best overall is his best reliever season so I want that one".adding this doesn't apply to my guys, but Larry is in the right.

 

[Funkley]

:rotflmao: Paul Quantrill in an alltime draft.

 

[Funkley]

Quantrill top 8 adjusted ERA: 238, 231, 193, 180, 156, 148, 143, 140Lee Smith: 231, 216, 200, 188, 183, 169, 152, 148John Franco: 229, 214, 212, 173, 172, 168, 162, 158Trevor Hoffman: 258, 205, 197, 178, 174, 161, 143, 140already covered EckersleyJeff Reardon: 318, 269, 210, 177, 166, 161, 142, 137Randy Myers: 291, 190, 187, 139, 139, 110, 105, 104then Fingersthose are the top 5 non Eck/Fingers guys on yoru list...other than the fact that they were closers (more glamour) what really makes them better than Quantrill?? Quantrill has better adjusted ERAs BY FAR than Randy Myers... heck he played better longer than Myers, too...so, the #6 guy you posted is not better than Quantrill, what were you talking about again?

Larry - they're better. The fact of the matter is you're probably a young guy who doesn't know the majority of these players. That's ok, the real issue is you stick your foot in your mouth when you try and compare Quantrill to two of the top relievers ever. It just makes you look foolish.

I didn't say Quantrill was actually better...I said statistically the argument could be made, and he does look better in a lot of ways...you guys are biased for 3 reasons:1. he isn't a starter2. he isn't a closer3. he's modernso you devalue him... plain and simple...

Larry, WTF are you talking about then if you're not arguing that he's as good. Quantrill is not as good as any of the guys on the list, he doesn't belong anywhere near an all-time draft. And the worst part is you're defending it. I devalue him because HE'S NOT THAT GOOD! Understand?Here's baseball-reference's comparable players by age:Greg Harris (911) Bob Miller (907) Don Aase (905) Eric Plunk (905) Dan Schatzeder (904) Jim Gott (899) Eddie Fisher (897) Dennis Lamp (896) Gene Garber (896) Paul Lindblad (895) Quantrill belongs in whatever draft these guys are going in...

:rotflmao: :rotflmao:

 

[ScottNorwood]

Don Aase :rotflmao:

 

[Nipsey]

Lost to Larry BOY in 11 innings.  Quantrill pitched 2 scoreless.  I wonder if a member of the Quantrill family works for WIS.com?

and you scored 3 off Smoltz in 1/3, the first runs scored on him this year...

quit whining, your lucky it wasn't 5-2 after 9...

I wan't whining. Its just a game to me big guy.

Quantrill has been incredible thus far. I hope he falls to earth, but only time will tell.

doubt it... Quantrill's sim season:

2003 34 LAD NL 2 5 89 0 0 0 21 1 77.3 61 18 15 2 15 44 3 0 291 1.75 4.03 231

whip a little under 1, ERA of 1.75, 1 save, 89 games, a 231 adjusted ERA...

he isn't gonna come down any time soon...

So not only did you draft Paul Quantrill, but you used his 2nd best season? Ridiculous. You're a cheat.

Name Team T IP/162 ERA W-L S WHIP OAV BB/9 K/9 HR/9 Salary

1. Quantrill, Paul 1993 Boston Red Sox R 138 3.91 6-12 1 1.41 .267 2.87 4.30 0.85 $3,469,839

2. Quantrill, Paul 2003 Los Angeles Dodgers R 77 1.75 2-5 1 0.98 .208 1.75 5.12 0.23 $2,950,864

3. Quantrill, Paul 2001 Toronto Blue Jays R 83 3.04 11-2 2 1.18 .257 1.30 6.29 0.65 $2,786,696

4. Quantrill, Paul 1997 Toronto Blue Jays R 88 1.94 6-7 5 1.36 .281 1.74 5.73 0.51 $2,608,282

wrong...

1. Quantrill, Paul 1995 Philadelphia Phillies R 202 4.67 11-12 0 1.43 .283 2.21 5.17 1.00 $5,038,848

2. Quantrill, Paul 1993 Boston Red Sox R 138 3.91 6-12 1 1.41 .267 2.87 4.30 0.85 $3,469,839

3. Quantrill, Paul 2003 Los Angeles Dodgers R 77 1.75 2-5 1 0.98 .208 1.75 5.12 0.23 $2,950,864

4. Quantrill, Paul 2001 Toronto Blue Jays R 83 3.04 11-2 2 1.18 .257 1.30 6.29 0.65 $2,786,696

5. Quantrill, Paul 1997 Toronto Blue Jays R 88 1.94 6-7 5 1.36 .281 1.74 5.73 0.51 $2,608,282

6. Quantrill, Paul 1996 Toronto Blue Jays R 134 5.43 5-14 0 1.66 .299 3.42 5.76 1.81 $2,559,818

7. Quantrill, Paul 1998 Toronto Blue Jays R 80 2.59 3-4 7 1.38 .268 2.48 6.64 0.56 $2,422,805

8. Quantrill, Paul 2002 Los Angeles Dodgers R 76 2.72 5-4 1 1.38 .259 2.95 6.26 0.12 $2,185,058

9. Quantrill, Paul 2004 New York Yankees R 95 4.72 7-3 1 1.51 .303 1.89 3.49 0.47 $2,065,008

10. Quantrill, Paul 2000 Toronto Blue Jays R 84 4.52 2-5 1 1.49 .285 2.69 5.06 0.75 $1,968,334

11. Quantrill, Paul 1994 Philadelphia Phillies R 75 4.92 3-3 1 1.49 .287 2.55 4.75 1.19 $1,718,998

12. Quantrill, Paul 1994 Boston Red Sox R 75 4.92 3-3 1 1.49 .287 2.55 4.75 1.19 $1,718,998

13. Quantrill, Paul 1992 Boston Red Sox R 49 2.19 2-3 1 1.42 .271 2.74 4.38 0.18 $1,301,505

14. Quantrill, Paul 1999 Toronto Blue Jays R 49 3.33 3-2 0 1.44 .266 3.14 5.18 0.92 $1,239,281

15. Quantrill, Paul 1994 Philadelphia Phillies R 42 6.00 2-2 1 1.63 .302 3.00 3.90 0.90 $771,692

I thought we were using the Dennis Eckersly rule that you ignore the starter years.

Only if you want to. That is the one thing we got flexibility on. If you want to dump the starter (high IP) seasons you can to get the more dominant (w/ less IP) reliever #'s but only if you take his 3rd best reliever year. If his 3rd best overall year is what you want that is fine too.

So if Dennis Eckersley had only two years as a starter, we could have drafted him and used the most dominant season ever accomplished by a reliever, because that would have been his 3rd highest salary? Hmmm.... I wonder how many other relievers like Quantrill were missed.

I took Ecks third best reliever season. Not third best season overall.

you could have took his third best overall. what you couldn't have done is said, "his 4th best overall is his best reliever season so I want that one".

adding this doesn't apply to my guys, but Larry is in the right.

I WAS ####### TOLD THIRD BEST RELIEVER SEASON. I'M CALLING BULL#### ON THIS ONE. AND UCONN, THANKS FOR TELLING ME TO "SHUT THE #### UP" WHEN I WAS TRYING TO GET THIS #### RESOLVED. CLEARLY, IT NEVER WAS.

 

[Notorious T.R.E.]

Don Aase :rotflmao:

Dan "Freakin" Schatzader!

 

[Nipsey]

Lost to Larry BOY in 11 innings.  Quantrill pitched 2 scoreless.  I wonder if a member of the Quantrill family works for WIS.com?

and you scored 3 off Smoltz in 1/3, the first runs scored on him this year...

quit whining, your lucky it wasn't 5-2 after 9...

I wan't whining. Its just a game to me big guy.

Quantrill has been incredible thus far. I hope he falls to earth, but only time will tell.

doubt it... Quantrill's sim season:

2003 34 LAD NL 2 5 89 0 0 0 21 1 77.3 61 18 15 2 15 44 3 0 291 1.75 4.03 231

whip a little under 1, ERA of 1.75, 1 save, 89 games, a 231 adjusted ERA...

he isn't gonna come down any time soon...

So not only did you draft Paul Quantrill, but you used his 2nd best season? Ridiculous. You're a cheat.

Name Team T IP/162 ERA W-L S WHIP OAV BB/9 K/9 HR/9 Salary

1. Quantrill, Paul 1993 Boston Red Sox R 138 3.91 6-12 1 1.41 .267 2.87 4.30 0.85 $3,469,839

2. Quantrill, Paul 2003 Los Angeles Dodgers R 77 1.75 2-5 1 0.98 .208 1.75 5.12 0.23 $2,950,864

3. Quantrill, Paul 2001 Toronto Blue Jays R 83 3.04 11-2 2 1.18 .257 1.30 6.29 0.65 $2,786,696

4. Quantrill, Paul 1997 Toronto Blue Jays R 88 1.94 6-7 5 1.36 .281 1.74 5.73 0.51 $2,608,282

wrong...

1. Quantrill, Paul 1995 Philadelphia Phillies R 202 4.67 11-12 0 1.43 .283 2.21 5.17 1.00 $5,038,848

2. Quantrill, Paul 1993 Boston Red Sox R 138 3.91 6-12 1 1.41 .267 2.87 4.30 0.85 $3,469,839

3. Quantrill, Paul 2003 Los Angeles Dodgers R 77 1.75 2-5 1 0.98 .208 1.75 5.12 0.23 $2,950,864

4. Quantrill, Paul 2001 Toronto Blue Jays R 83 3.04 11-2 2 1.18 .257 1.30 6.29 0.65 $2,786,696

5. Quantrill, Paul 1997 Toronto Blue Jays R 88 1.94 6-7 5 1.36 .281 1.74 5.73 0.51 $2,608,282

6. Quantrill, Paul 1996 Toronto Blue Jays R 134 5.43 5-14 0 1.66 .299 3.42 5.76 1.81 $2,559,818

7. Quantrill, Paul 1998 Toronto Blue Jays R 80 2.59 3-4 7 1.38 .268 2.48 6.64 0.56 $2,422,805

8. Quantrill, Paul 2002 Los Angeles Dodgers R 76 2.72 5-4 1 1.38 .259 2.95 6.26 0.12 $2,185,058

9. Quantrill, Paul 2004 New York Yankees R 95 4.72 7-3 1 1.51 .303 1.89 3.49 0.47 $2,065,008

10. Quantrill, Paul 2000 Toronto Blue Jays R 84 4.52 2-5 1 1.49 .285 2.69 5.06 0.75 $1,968,334

11. Quantrill, Paul 1994 Philadelphia Phillies R 75 4.92 3-3 1 1.49 .287 2.55 4.75 1.19 $1,718,998

12. Quantrill, Paul 1994 Boston Red Sox R 75 4.92 3-3 1 1.49 .287 2.55 4.75 1.19 $1,718,998

13. Quantrill, Paul 1992 Boston Red Sox R 49 2.19 2-3 1 1.42 .271 2.74 4.38 0.18 $1,301,505

14. Quantrill, Paul 1999 Toronto Blue Jays R 49 3.33 3-2 0 1.44 .266 3.14 5.18 0.92 $1,239,281

15. Quantrill, Paul 1994 Philadelphia Phillies R 42 6.00 2-2 1 1.63 .302 3.00 3.90 0.90 $771,692

I thought we were using the Dennis Eckersly rule that you ignore the starter years.

Only if you want to. That is the one thing we got flexibility on. If you want to dump the starter (high IP) seasons you can to get the more dominant (w/ less IP) reliever #'s but only if you take his 3rd best reliever year. If his 3rd best overall year is what you want that is fine too.

So if Dennis Eckersley had only two years as a starter, we could have drafted him and used the most dominant season ever accomplished by a reliever, because that would have been his 3rd highest salary? Hmmm.... I wonder how many other relievers like Quantrill were missed.

I took Ecks third best reliever season. Not third best season overall.

Larryboy didn't take Quantrill's 3rd best reliever season. That's my point. If a guy had two seasons as a starter, you'd be able to use the season in which he had his best season ever as a reliever.

THEN LARRY BOY'S TEAM IS ILLEGAL LIKE I SUSPECTED ALL ALONG!!!!

 

[Koya]

uh oh.

 

[Capella]

Nipsey is right.If you're using him as a reliever, it's third-best reliever season.Adjust your team jeebus boy.

 

[ScottNorwood]

Cheating makes baby Jesus cry.

 

[Capella]

Cheating makes baby Jesus cry.

Third place makes Baby Nipsey cry.

 

[larry_boy_44]

Nipsey is right.If you're using him as a reliever, it's third-best reliever season.Adjust your team jeebus boy.

no, we all agreed to 3rd best reliever season OR 3rd best season...there was never any # attached to it

 

[Capella]

Nipsey is right.If you're using him as a reliever, it's third-best reliever season.Adjust your team jeebus boy.

no, we all agreed to 3rd best reliever season OR 3rd best season...there was never any # attached to it

no, no we didn't.don't argue with me on this, it was very clear. change quantrill to his third best RP season.

 

[Notorious T.R.E.]

Cheating makes baby Jesus cry.

REPENT!

 

[larry_boy_44]

Nipsey is right.If you're using him as a reliever, it's third-best reliever season.Adjust your team jeebus boy.

no, we all agreed to 3rd best reliever season OR 3rd best season...there was never any # attached to it

no, no we didn't.don't argue with me on this, it was very clear. change quantrill to his third best RP season.

why?I used his 3rd best overall season, that is 100% in the rules unless you go and make sure that EVERY SINGLE player who isn't the starting pitcher on his squad is using his 3rd best year that qualifies for a reliever position...

 

[ScottNorwood]

I think he should have to replace Quantrill with Steve Howe.

 

[larry_boy_44]

I think he should have to replace Quantrill with Steve Howe.

only if Capella has to replace Early Wynn... and Waite Hoyt...

 

[Capella]

Nipsey is right.If you're using him as a reliever, it's third-best reliever season.Adjust your team jeebus boy.

no, we all agreed to 3rd best reliever season OR 3rd best season...there was never any # attached to it

no, no we didn't.don't argue with me on this, it was very clear. change quantrill to his third best RP season.

why?I used his 3rd best overall season, that is 100% in the rules unless you go and make sure that EVERY SINGLE player who isn't the starting pitcher on his squad is using his 3rd best year that qualifies for a reliever position...

because when it came up with Eck, we all decided that if you're going to use a guy who was a SP/RP, and you chose to go with the RP side of his career, it was his third-best RP stats.DO IT

 

[Capella]

I think he should have to replace Quantrill with Steve Howe.

only if Capella has to replace Early Wynn... and Waite Hoyt...

wtf are you talking about?

 

[larry_boy_44]

Nipsey is right.If you're using him as a reliever, it's third-best reliever season.Adjust your team jeebus boy.

no, we all agreed to 3rd best reliever season OR 3rd best season...there was never any # attached to it

no, no we didn't.don't argue with me on this, it was very clear. change quantrill to his third best RP season.

why?I used his 3rd best overall season, that is 100% in the rules unless you go and make sure that EVERY SINGLE player who isn't the starting pitcher on his squad is using his 3rd best year that qualifies for a reliever position...

because when it came up with Eck, we all decided that if you're going to use a guy who was a SP/RP, and you chose to go with the RP side of his career, it was his third-best RP stats.DO IT

I didn't choose the RP side of his career, I chose his WHOLE career...

 

[larry_boy_44]

I think he should have to replace Quantrill with Steve Howe.

only if Capella has to replace Early Wynn... and Waite Hoyt...

wtf are you talking about?

they haven't started...and you definately didn't use thier 3rd best relief seasons...

 

[Capella]

I think he should have to replace Quantrill with Steve Howe.

only if Capella has to replace Early Wynn... and Waite Hoyt...

wtf are you talking about?

they haven't started...and you definately didn't use thier 3rd best relief seasons...

you're missing the boat here..

 

[larry_boy_44]

I think he should have to replace Quantrill with Steve Howe.

only if Capella has to replace Early Wynn... and Waite Hoyt...

wtf are you talking about?

they haven't started...and you definately didn't use thier 3rd best relief seasons...

you're missing the boat here..

no... the boat is that your pissed that I got a better player than your all time great players and you want me to knock him down a few pegs...

 

[Funkley]

Nipsey is right.If you're using him as a reliever, it's third-best reliever season.Adjust your team jeebus boy.

no, we all agreed to 3rd best reliever season OR 3rd best season...there was never any # attached to it

no, no we didn't.don't argue with me on this, it was very clear. change quantrill to his third best RP season.

why?I used his 3rd best overall season, that is 100% in the rules unless you go and make sure that EVERY SINGLE player who isn't the starting pitcher on his squad is using his 3rd best year that qualifies for a reliever position...

because when it came up with Eck, we all decided that if you're going to use a guy who was a SP/RP, and you chose to go with the RP side of his career, it was his third-best RP stats.DO IT

I didn't choose the RP side of his career, I chose his WHOLE career...

Same rule applies to Quantrill as it applies to Eck.....besides, you said Quantrill was as good as Eck anyway.

 

[larry_boy_44]

Nipsey is right.If you're using him as a reliever, it's third-best reliever season.Adjust your team jeebus boy.

no, we all agreed to 3rd best reliever season OR 3rd best season...there was never any # attached to it

no, no we didn't.don't argue with me on this, it was very clear. change quantrill to his third best RP season.

why?I used his 3rd best overall season, that is 100% in the rules unless you go and make sure that EVERY SINGLE player who isn't the starting pitcher on his squad is using his 3rd best year that qualifies for a reliever position...

because when it came up with Eck, we all decided that if you're going to use a guy who was a SP/RP, and you chose to go with the RP side of his career, it was his third-best RP stats.DO IT

I didn't choose the RP side of his career, I chose his WHOLE career...

Same rule applies to Quantrill as it applies to Eck.....besides, you said Quantrill was as good as Eck anyway.

exactlyI got to choose whether I wanted Quantrill's whole career or his RP career...I chose his whole career...

 

[UCONN]

cheating is a sin

 

[larry_boy_44]

cheating is a sin

I'm not cheating... I am 100% following the rules that we set at the beginning...

 

[UCONN]

cheater, cheater, pumpkin eater...

 

[Kraft...]

My bullpen cant win. I rest up grove to try him, and between he and sid "great raw numbers horrible results" fernandez, go into the 9th winning by 2, go out losing by 6.



What a waste of another good starting performance.

I have to relish this moment because surely I will loose the next two.

 

[Capella]

 

[Koya]

omg. my smilies are dead. wt f'n f?

 

[Capella]

 

[Capella]

Mother####er

 

[Koya]

this board sucks as much as sim fishers.

 

[Funkley]

Nipsey is right.

If you're using him as a reliever, it's third-best reliever season.

Adjust your team jeebus boy.

no, we all agreed to 3rd best reliever season OR 3rd best season...there was never any # attached to it

no, no we didn't.don't argue with me on this, it was very clear. change quantrill to his third best RP season.

why?I used his 3rd best overall season, that is 100% in the rules unless you go and make sure that EVERY SINGLE player who isn't the starting pitcher on his squad is using his 3rd best year that qualifies for a reliever position...

because when it came up with Eck, we all decided that if you're going to use a guy who was a SP/RP, and you chose to go with the RP side of his career, it was his third-best RP stats.DO IT

I didn't choose the RP side of his career, I chose his WHOLE career...

Same rule applies to Quantrill as it applies to Eck.....besides, you said Quantrill was as good as Eck anyway.

exactlyI got to choose whether I wanted Quantrill's whole career or his RP career...

I chose his whole career...

That's not what I took from it at all. You get his third best year as a starter or his third best year as a reliever. And WTF happened to the board?

 

[Koya]

this board sucks as much as sim fishers.

those "quote" graphics need to go.

 

[Nipsey]

LARRY, THIS WAS DISCUSSED. YOU HAVE TO CHANGE TO HIS THIRD BEST RELIEVER SEASON. YOU'RE CHEATING IF YOU DON'T AND HONESTLY, I TRULY BELIEVE YOU SHOULD FORFEIT SOME OF YOUR WINS. THIS IS TOTAL BULL####!!!!

 

[Capella]

When somebody is replying now, their name on the bottom is in italics. So I KNEW that rant from Nipsey was coming.

 

[ScottNorwood]

Looks like you guys run a tight ship.

 

[Koya]

When somebody is replying now, their name on the bottom is in italics.

So I KNEW that rant from Nipsey was coming.

you need some board gimmick for that?unsure.gif

:unsureunsurewillwork:

(previous post deleted. quote is on the bottom? wtf?)

 

[Koya]

3 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)

3 Members: Koya, Funkley, Nipsey

 

[Funkley]

Slotting Quantrill anywhere other than the 'RP' slot is abusing the rules. Quantrill does not belong in one of the SP/RP slots because there's no friggin way he's ever going to start a game. Picking and choosing where to put him based on taking advantage of a loop hole is .

 

[Capella]

nipsey is about to ##### again

 

[Nipsey]

When somebody is replying now, their name on the bottom is in italics.

So I KNEW that rant from Nipsey was coming.

YOUR DAMN RIGHT A RANT WAS COMING. THIS IS TOTAL BULL#### AND TO FIND OUT THAT LARRY HAS BEEN CHEATING THE WHOLE TIME REALLY HURTS ME PERSONALLY.

 

[Koya]

3 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)

3 Members: Koya, Funkley, Nipsey

6 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)6 Members: Koya, ScottNorwood, larry_boy_44, lastresort66, Funkley, Nipsey

Still going? Whoa boy.