What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***OFFICIAL*** FFA MLB Draft (1 Viewer)

another lead blown in the top of the 9th. :hot:

WHY THE #### ARE MY STARTERS BEING TAKEN OUT WHEN THEY CLEARLY HAVE THE JUICE TO FINISH THE GAME!

####### team's blown 7 saves out of 9 chances. This is bull####.
I got f'ed over once (to Larryboy's team). McDowell was pitching a no-no shutout and he gets replaced in a non-save situation in the 9th and I lose 1-0. The reason? According to WIS.com after I sent them a protest letter, they said I pinched for McDowell because "it was my last chance to win". HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF EXTRA INNINGS, ########?!Where's John Martinez? I wanna kick the guy in the balls for making a flawed game.

 
Honestly, this needs to be dealt with. Larry has clearly and purposely decided to not follow the rules. Some of his wins should be taken away and he should have to forfeit a player, or something along those lines. NO WONDER his ####### bullpen is untouchable! Who else has Larry decided to use an illegal season with? And all this after we spent most of the afternoon talking about the ####### guy (Quantrill). If I could use Eck's best season, I'd have 6 more wins than I have now. SIX. That's the truth.

Larry's record should be adjusted....to losses for every appearance Quantrill has made. EVERY ONE.

This is completely inexcusable and I make a motion that Larry be disqualified from future leagues for this blatant disregard for the rules, this disregard for our time and the horrific scar this will leave on the entire thread as a whole.

Who'd have guessed that the guy who claims to be the most religious, ends up cheating in such a way as to submarine (literally) months of effort on all our parts. Shame on you Larry. You've broken my spirit and may you be dealt with swiftly and with great vengeance.

YOU DIRTY GAY WHORE!

 
Slotting Quantrill anywhere other than the 'RP' slot is abusing the rules. Quantrill does not belong in one of the SP/RP slots because there's no friggin way he's ever going to start a game. Picking and choosing where to put him based on taking advantage of a loop hole is :bs: .
it doesn't matter where he "fits" or whatever you think...I am 100% within the rules using his 3rd best overall season...

 
Slotting Quantrill anywhere other than the 'RP' slot is abusing the rules. Quantrill does not belong in one of the SP/RP slots because there's no friggin way he's ever going to start a game. Picking and choosing where to put him based on taking advantage of a loop hole is :bs: .
it doesn't matter where he "fits" or whatever you think...I am 100% within the rules using his 3rd best overall season...
I make a motion to remove Larry forcebly from the league, effective immediately. You've been caught bending the rules, now you're going to tell us the rules that were agreed upon, you'll not abide by?I vote for immediate expulsion.

 
Honestly, this needs to be dealt with. Larry has clearly and purposely decided to not follow the rules. Some of his wins should be taken away and he should have to forfeit a player, or something along those lines. NO WONDER his ####### bullpen is untouchable! Who else has Larry decided to use an illegal season with? And all this after we spent most of the afternoon talking about the ####### guy (Quantrill). If I could use Eck's best season, I'd have 6 more wins than I have now. SIX. That's the truth.

Larry's record should be adjusted....to losses for every appearance Quantrill has made. EVERY ONE.

This is completely inexcusable and I make a motion that Larry be disqualified from future leagues for this blatant disregard for the rules, this disregard for our time and the horrific scar this will leave on the entire thread as a whole.

Who'd have guessed that the guy who claims to be the most religious, ends up cheating in such a way as to submarine (literally) months of effort on all our parts. Shame on you Larry. You've broken my spirit and may you be dealt with swiftly and with great vengeance.

YOU DIRTY GAY WHORE!
:)
 
Honestly, this needs to be dealt with. Larry has clearly and purposely decided to not follow the rules. Some of his wins should be taken away and he should have to forfeit a player, or something along those lines. NO WONDER his ####### bullpen is untouchable! Who else has Larry decided to use an illegal season with? And all this after we spent most of the afternoon talking about the ####### guy (Quantrill). If I could use Eck's best season, I'd have 6 more wins than I have now. SIX. That's the truth.

Larry's record should be adjusted....to losses for every appearance Quantrill has made. EVERY ONE.

This is completely inexcusable and I make a motion that Larry be disqualified from future leagues for this blatant disregard for the rules, this disregard for our time and the horrific scar this will leave on the entire thread as a whole.

Who'd have guessed that the guy who claims to be the most religious, ends up cheating in such a way as to submarine (literally) months of effort on all our parts. Shame on you Larry. You've broken my spirit and may you be dealt with swiftly and with great vengeance.

YOU DIRTY GAY WHORE!
Doing this would make me the best team in the entire league. (I'm tied with Harrier's team, but due to the fact I have one less loss than he does, I'm ahead on percentage.)I would be in total support of this. :ph34r:

 
Slotting Quantrill anywhere other than the 'RP' slot is abusing the rules. Quantrill does not belong in one of the SP/RP slots because there's no friggin way he's ever going to start a game. Picking and choosing where to put him based on taking advantage of a loop hole is :bs: .
it doesn't matter where he "fits" or whatever you think...I am 100% within the rules using his 3rd best overall season...
I make a motion to remove Larry forcebly from the league, effective immediately. You've been caught bending the rules, now you're going to tell us the rules that were agreed upon, you'll not abide by?I vote for immediate expulsion.
we said you could have either 3rd best season or 3rd best reliever season...there were not restrictions or anything else on it...

only you could use 3rd best reliever season if you chose to...

I followed the rules we had in place...

 
Slotting Quantrill anywhere other than the 'RP' slot is abusing the rules. Quantrill does not belong in one of the SP/RP slots because there's no friggin way he's ever going to start a game. Picking and choosing where to put him based on taking advantage of a loop hole is :bs: .
it doesn't matter where he "fits" or whatever you think...I am 100% within the rules using his 3rd best overall season...
Loopholefisher
 
Honestly, this needs to be dealt with. Larry has clearly and purposely decided to not follow the rules. Some of his wins should be taken away and he should have to forfeit a player, or something along those lines. NO WONDER his ####### bullpen is untouchable! Who else has Larry decided to use an illegal season with? And all this after we spent most of the afternoon talking about the ####### guy (Quantrill). If I could use Eck's best season, I'd have 6 more wins than I have now. SIX. That's the truth.

Larry's record should be adjusted....to losses for every appearance Quantrill has made. EVERY ONE.

This is completely inexcusable and I make a motion that Larry be disqualified from future leagues for this blatant disregard for the rules, this disregard for our time and the horrific scar this will leave on the entire thread as a whole.

Who'd have guessed that the guy who claims to be the most religious, ends up cheating in such a way as to submarine (literally) months of effort on all our parts. Shame on you Larry. You've broken my spirit and may you be dealt with swiftly and with great vengeance.

YOU DIRTY GAY WHORE!
Jesus Christ, can they fix that laughing smilie already or what.. :lol: :lol:
 
Slotting Quantrill anywhere other than the 'RP' slot is abusing the rules. Quantrill does not belong in one of the SP/RP slots because there's no friggin way he's ever going to start a game. Picking and choosing where to put him based on taking advantage of a loop hole is :bs: .
it doesn't matter where he "fits" or whatever you think...I am 100% within the rules using his 3rd best overall season...
Loopholefisher
LOL. I say we all use whatever season we want. Heck, we did the draft to eliminate drafting for one season. Now that we have accomplished that, lets go ahead and use our guys at their best.

Plus, third year fishers would feel the wrath, as they deserve.

 
Slotting Quantrill anywhere other than the 'RP' slot is abusing the rules. Quantrill does not belong in one of the SP/RP slots because there's no friggin way he's ever going to start a game. Picking and choosing where to put him based on taking advantage of a loop hole is :bs: .
it doesn't matter where he "fits" or whatever you think...I am 100% within the rules using his 3rd best overall season...
Loopholefisher
LOL. I say we all use whatever season we want. Heck, we did the draft to eliminate drafting for one season. Now that we have accomplished that, lets go ahead and use our guys at their best.

Plus, third year fishers would feel the wrath, as they deserve.
I say this is a great idea.
 
Slotting Quantrill anywhere other than the 'RP' slot is abusing the rules. Quantrill does not belong in one of the SP/RP slots because there's no friggin way he's ever going to start a game. Picking and choosing where to put him based on taking advantage of a loop hole is :bs: .
it doesn't matter where he "fits" or whatever you think...I am 100% within the rules using his 3rd best overall season...
Loopholefisher
LOL. I say we all use whatever season we want. Heck, we did the draft to eliminate drafting for one season. Now that we have accomplished that, lets go ahead and use our guys at their best.

Plus, third year fishers would feel the wrath, as they deserve.
I say this is a great idea.
I don't think you want to do this. Cy, Feller, Rollie and Eck would literally be unhittable. You'd be risking boredom. I'd win every game.####IN' SHAME ON YOU LARRY

 
Slotting Quantrill anywhere other than the 'RP' slot is abusing the rules. Quantrill does not belong in one of the SP/RP slots because there's no friggin way he's ever going to start a game. Picking and choosing where to put him based on taking advantage of a loop hole is :bs: .
it doesn't matter where he "fits" or whatever you think...I am 100% within the rules using his 3rd best overall season...
Loopholefisher
LOL. I say we all use whatever season we want. Heck, we did the draft to eliminate drafting for one season. Now that we have accomplished that, lets go ahead and use our guys at their best.

Plus, third year fishers would feel the wrath, as they deserve.
I say this is a great idea.
I don't think you want to do this. Cy, Feller, Rollie and Eck would literally be unhittable. You'd be risking boredom. I'd win every game.####IN' SHAME ON YOU LARRY
By doing this, I may be able to get Big Mac in a year where he was actually useful. Plus, I can get Radbourn's 600+ IP year!I am also in full support of this.

 
1. what rule did I break again??2. I thought we should be able to use any season from the start (I thought maybe we should eliminate thier best season, but then, what is thier best season?)the only problem I would have with changing players now is the stats will be majorly skewed...and...3. what rule did I break again??

 
Can we also assume that because Larry "decided" to use Quantrill's best season as a reliever, that he's done the exact same thing for Smoltz? (another guy who hasn't been a reliever his whole career)

NO WONDER LARRY'S BEEN WINNING

REMEMBER THIS LARRY, I HAVE THE POSTER ON MY WALL AND I'M QUOTING WORD FOR WORD:

A winner never cheats and a cheater never wins.

That's why you'll never catch me cheating Larry and that's why you'll never win.

"Ouch."

 
Can we also assume that because Larry "decided" to use Quantrill's best season as a reliever, that he's done the exact same thing for Smoltz? (another guy who hasn't been a reliever his whole career)

NO WONDER LARRY'S BEEN WINNING

REMEMBER THIS LARRY, I HAVE THE POSTER ON MY WALL AND I'M QUOTING WORD FOR WORD:

A winner never cheats and a cheater never wins.

That's why you'll never catch me cheating Larry and that's why you'll never win.

"Ouch."
they are having thier third year used...quit whining 'cuz you can't win...

 
1. what rule did I break again??

2. I thought we should be able to use any season from the start (I thought maybe we should eliminate thier best season, but then, what is thier best season?)

the only problem I would have with changing players now is the stats will be majorly skewed...

and...

3. what rule did I break again??
The "Eck" rule. If you have a reliever that has been a starter for some part of his career, you get to use him at reliever using only his third best season as a reliever.

And don't play dumb with us Larry, we know you're not dumb. (<<<<----this is shtick)

 
1. what rule did I break again??

2. I thought we should be able to use any season from the start (I thought maybe we should eliminate thier best season, but then, what is thier best season?)

the only problem I would have with changing players now is the stats will be majorly skewed...

and...

3. what rule did I break again??
The "Eck" rule. If you have a reliever that has been a starter for some part of his career, you get to use him at reliever using only his third best season as a reliever.

And don't play dumb with us Larry, we know you're not dumb. (<<<<----this is shtick)
it never said only... it said you could...huge difference...

besides which, how do you know what 3 players I put in the SP/RP spots and which 3 I didn't put there???

I might have put Quantrill in a split spot...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can we also assume that because Larry "decided" to use Quantrill's best season as a reliever, that he's done the exact same thing for Smoltz? (another guy who hasn't been a reliever his whole career)

NO WONDER LARRY'S BEEN WINNING

REMEMBER THIS LARRY, I HAVE THE POSTER ON MY WALL AND I'M QUOTING WORD FOR WORD:

A winner never cheats and a cheater never wins.

That's why you'll never catch me cheating Larry and that's why you'll never win.

"Ouch."
they are having thier third year used...quit whining 'cuz you can't win...
I'm serious. All the games Quantrill has appeared in should be forfeited. Also, can someone make sure Smoltz is legal, guy's awfully good.
 
Can we also assume that because Larry "decided" to use Quantrill's best season as a reliever, that he's done the exact same thing for Smoltz? (another guy who hasn't been a reliever his whole career)

NO WONDER LARRY'S BEEN WINNING

REMEMBER THIS LARRY, I HAVE THE POSTER ON MY WALL AND I'M QUOTING WORD FOR WORD:

A winner never cheats and a cheater never wins.

That's why you'll never catch me cheating Larry and that's why you'll never win.

"Ouch."
they are having thier third year used...quit whining 'cuz you can't win...
I'm serious. All the games Quantrill has appeared in should be forfeited. Also, can someone make sure Smoltz is legal, guy's awfully good.
do you plan on checking every roster? 'cuz I am pretty sure others are likely breaking this rule, too...I've already shown in this thread Cappy has 2 guys...

that or he's starting players he used the RP season for...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can we also assume that because Larry "decided" to use Quantrill's best season as a reliever, that he's done the exact same thing for Smoltz? (another guy who hasn't been a reliever his whole career)

NO WONDER LARRY'S BEEN WINNING

REMEMBER THIS LARRY, I HAVE THE POSTER ON MY WALL AND I'M QUOTING WORD FOR WORD:

A winner never cheats and a cheater never wins.

That's why you'll never catch me cheating Larry and that's why you'll never win.

"Ouch."
they are having thier third year used...quit whining 'cuz you can't win...
I'm serious. All the games Quantrill has appeared in should be forfeited. Also, can someone make sure Smoltz is legal, guy's awfully good.
do you plan on checking every roster? 'cuz I am pretty sure others are likely breaking this rule, too...I've already shown in this thread Cappy has 2 guys...

that or he's starting players he used the RP season for...
that's not breaking the rule you nitwit.
 


1. what rule did I break again??

2. I thought we should be able to use any season from the start (I thought maybe we should eliminate thier best season, but then, what is thier best season?)

the only problem I would have with changing players now is the stats will be majorly skewed...

and...

3. what rule did I break again??
The "Eck" rule. If you have a reliever that has been a starter for some part of his career, you get to use him at reliever using only his third best season as a reliever.

And don't play dumb with us Larry, we know you're not dumb. (<<<<----this is shtick)
it never said only... it said you could...huge difference...

besides which, how do you know what 3 players I put in the SP/RP spots and which 3 I didn't put there???

I might have put Quantrill in a split spot...
Bull####. We did say "only". Larry, you KNOW that the season you're using Quantrill with was a season he was a reliever. If you wanted to use him as a starter, you would have.If you want to argue it, you can, but you're wrong. You've bent the rules and gotten a player (with a 0.00 ERA!!!!!!) that you should not have. That makes you a cheater.

YOU GAY CHEATING WHORE

 


1. what rule did I break again??

2. I thought we should be able to use any season from the start (I thought maybe we should eliminate thier best season, but then, what is thier best season?)

the only problem I would have with changing players now is the stats will be majorly skewed...

and...

3. what rule did I break again??
The "Eck" rule. If you have a reliever that has been a starter for some part of his career, you get to use him at reliever using only his third best season as a reliever.

And don't play dumb with us Larry, we know you're not dumb. (<<<<----this is shtick)
it never said only... it said you could...huge difference...

besides which, how do you know what 3 players I put in the SP/RP spots and which 3 I didn't put there???

I might have put Quantrill in a split spot...
Bull####. We did say "only". Larry, you KNOW that the season you're using Quantrill with was a season he was a reliever. If you wanted to use him as a starter, you would have.If you want to argue it, you can, but you're wrong. You've bent the rules and gotten a player (with a 0.00 ERA!!!!!!) that you should not have. That makes you a cheater.

YOU GAY CHEATING WHORE
for one, Quantrill has a 1.42 ERA...for two, his 3rd best season IS a season as a reliever, therefore I don't have to use the Eck-rule...

the Eck-rule really only applied to guys who had both reliever seasons and starter seasons, and no one ever said that you had to do it if you didn't want to...

 


1. what rule did I break again??

2. I thought we should be able to use any season from the start (I thought maybe we should eliminate thier best season, but then, what is thier best season?)

the only problem I would have with changing players now is the stats will be majorly skewed...

and...

3. what rule did I break again??
The "Eck" rule. If you have a reliever that has been a starter for some part of his career, you get to use him at reliever using only his third best season as a reliever.

And don't play dumb with us Larry, we know you're not dumb. (<<<<----this is shtick)
it never said only... it said you could...huge difference...

besides which, how do you know what 3 players I put in the SP/RP spots and which 3 I didn't put there???

I might have put Quantrill in a split spot...
Bull####. We did say "only". Larry, you KNOW that the season you're using Quantrill with was a season he was a reliever. If you wanted to use him as a starter, you would have.If you want to argue it, you can, but you're wrong. You've bent the rules and gotten a player (with a 0.00 ERA!!!!!!) that you should not have. That makes you a cheater.

YOU GAY CHEATING WHORE
for one, Quantrill has a 1.42 ERA...for two, his 3rd best season IS a season as a reliever, therefore I don't have to use the Eck-rule...

the Eck-rule really only applied to guys who had both reliever seasons and starter seasons, and no one ever said that you had to do it if you didn't want to...
This is wrong. It was clear that if you were taking a guy who did both during his career, you either took his third best year as a starter if you drafted him as a starter, or you took his third best year as a reliever if you drafted him as a reliever. Quantrill is a case nobody thought of as he only had one season as a starter. You decided to mix his starter and reliever years together so that you could get his second best season as a reliver. Again, no one thought of this kind of case, so there was no rule in place. It was a nice little loophole that you exploited.
 


1. what rule did I break again??

2. I thought we should be able to use any season from the start (I thought maybe we should eliminate thier best season, but then, what is thier best season?)

the only problem I would have with changing players now is the stats will be majorly skewed...

and...

3. what rule did I break again??
The "Eck" rule. If you have a reliever that has been a starter for some part of his career, you get to use him at reliever using only his third best season as a reliever.

And don't play dumb with us Larry, we know you're not dumb. (<<<<----this is shtick)
it never said only... it said you could...huge difference...

besides which, how do you know what 3 players I put in the SP/RP spots and which 3 I didn't put there???

I might have put Quantrill in a split spot...
Bull####. We did say "only". Larry, you KNOW that the season you're using Quantrill with was a season he was a reliever. If you wanted to use him as a starter, you would have.If you want to argue it, you can, but you're wrong. You've bent the rules and gotten a player (with a 0.00 ERA!!!!!!) that you should not have. That makes you a cheater.

YOU GAY CHEATING WHORE
for one, Quantrill has a 1.42 ERA...for two, his 3rd best season IS a season as a reliever, therefore I don't have to use the Eck-rule...

the Eck-rule really only applied to guys who had both reliever seasons and starter seasons, and no one ever said that you had to do it if you didn't want to...
This is wrong. It was clear that if you were taking a guy who did both during his career, you either took his third best year as a starter if you drafted him as a starter, or you took his third best year as a reliever if you drafted him as a reliever. Quantrill is a case nobody thought of as he only had one season as a starter. You decided to mix his starter and reliever years together so that you could get his second best season as a reliver. Again, no one thought of this kind of case, so there was no rule in place. It was a nice little loophole that you exploited.
Not a loophole, it's breaking the rules set.WIS will be emailed.

 


1. what rule did I break again??

2. I thought we should be able to use any season from the start (I thought maybe we should eliminate thier best season, but then, what is thier best season?)

the only problem I would have with changing players now is the stats will be majorly skewed...

and...

3. what rule did I break again??
The "Eck" rule. If you have a reliever that has been a starter for some part of his career, you get to use him at reliever using only his third best season as a reliever.

And don't play dumb with us Larry, we know you're not dumb. (<<<<----this is shtick)
it never said only... it said you could...huge difference...

besides which, how do you know what 3 players I put in the SP/RP spots and which 3 I didn't put there???

I might have put Quantrill in a split spot...
Bull####. We did say "only". Larry, you KNOW that the season you're using Quantrill with was a season he was a reliever. If you wanted to use him as a starter, you would have.If you want to argue it, you can, but you're wrong. You've bent the rules and gotten a player (with a 0.00 ERA!!!!!!) that you should not have. That makes you a cheater.

YOU GAY CHEATING WHORE
for one, Quantrill has a 1.42 ERA...for two, his 3rd best season IS a season as a reliever, therefore I don't have to use the Eck-rule...

the Eck-rule really only applied to guys who had both reliever seasons and starter seasons, and no one ever said that you had to do it if you didn't want to...
This is wrong. It was clear that if you were taking a guy who did both during his career, you either took his third best year as a starter if you drafted him as a starter, or you took his third best year as a reliever if you drafted him as a reliever. Quantrill is a case nobody thought of as he only had one season as a starter. You decided to mix his starter and reliever years together so that you could get his second best season as a reliver. Again, no one thought of this kind of case, so there was no rule in place. It was a nice little loophole that you exploited.
Not a loophole, it's breaking the rules set.WIS will be emailed.
no it isn't...no one ever stated that you MUST use the third reliever season at any point...

it was said that you could choose to use the third reliever season if they had starter seasons that got in the way...

I chose not to...

 
I just got a PM from John, he'll be here shortly....
later Nipsey, I'll see you after your done using your alias...:rotflmao:
Larry -First of all, this is not Nipsey's alias. This has been proven.

Secondly, this whole scenario reminds me of my first league. I was just out of the Marines. My first pick ever was Tom Goodwin. (What can I say? I was young.) Anywho, we used the same structure you guys do (using 3rd best seasons). Some yahoo decides to do the exact same thing Larry decides to do. Just ruined the whole league. A lot of hearts were broken, and a lot of trust was lost. It was really sad.

So, I end up re-enlisting back in the Marines. I was pissed off. Around year two of the re-enlistment I'm stationed in Guam (my home now). We go to the mess for some chow and wouldn't you know, the guy who ruined our league ended up enlisting as well and was in my detail! He apologized and told me how he went through so much after blowing the league up. I heard his story and I forgave him. Today, he and I can joke about it, but sometimes deep down I can feel the fire roaring. Still hurts.

The moral of the story is: it's not worth it. Change your relievers back to the year they should be. It almost cost me a friend. "It almost cost me my life."

John Martinez

Owner What if Sports

PS Capella...can you tell me how to make the little "TM"?

 
larry, everybody but you understood the rules a certain way.

maybe..just maybe you're wrong? :loco:
here is what was said:
Another problem comes in to play with players who were both SP and RP.

Dennis Eckersley's lights out 1990 season, complete with 0.61 ERA and 73/4 K/BB ratio, is salaried much lower than a bunch of mediocre starting pitching seasons. Clearly that was his best career season and one that shouldn't be allowed in our game.
this is the big problem..say for some reason that ruth's 3rd-best season was one where he was a SP..obviously you'd want him as an OF (I'm sure this isn't the case, just saying)..that presents a problem.

wish we had thought of this beforehand.

maybe we can work something out where players who served dual-roles in their career, and the sim doesn't allow for it, we could have it be their 3rd-best year at that position the draftor requests? say for eck, his 3rd-best year as a RP, and for Babe, his 3rd-best year as an OF?

make sense?
I think this makes sense only with the pitching roles. So SP/RP, OF/SP, etc.Otherwise, people already made, or didn't make, draft choices based on the positional (C/1B/2B/SS/3B/OF) eligbility of players, and it wouldn't be fair to change it at this point.
well yeah, I agree..
I could go for that w/ pitchers. I think the only people it will effect are relief pitchers that started at the beginning of their career. I've already checked all your Babe Ruth types and nobody significant has a pitching year get in the way. W/ and Eck (or I guess a guy like Smoltz) I've got no problem if a guy wants to use a lesser salary to get the "reliever version" of that type of player if everybody agrees w/ it. I'm also not against going for "any season after 3rd highest salary" w/ position players, but if anybody is against it (and Harrier for one has said he is) I don't think it's fair to change the rules w/out unanimous agreement after it gets going.also adding in I didn't mean to go after Nipsey for questioning things. I come off as less than patient over a computer sometimes because I speak very plainly (and Nipsey likes to say this is being "holier than though" or something when actually it is just me being very literal). If he has legit questions over the rules that is cool. I don't think they are all that complicated...certainly not to the point where you can't fire a quick question to Cappy and then accept his judgement, but what do I know.
where in that does it say that you MUST use the third best reliever year? It says you can, not you must...
 
larry, everybody but you understood the rules a certain way.

maybe..just maybe you're wrong? :loco:
ok, Capella, who are your three "relief" pitchers?What are thier 3 qualifying relief pitcher positions and which year are you using for them?

 
larry, everybody but you understood the rules a certain way.

maybe..just maybe you're wrong?  :loco:
here is what was said:
Another problem comes in to play with players who were both SP and RP.

Dennis Eckersley's lights out 1990 season, complete with 0.61 ERA and 73/4 K/BB ratio, is salaried much lower than a bunch of mediocre starting pitching seasons. Clearly that was his best career season and one that shouldn't be allowed in our game.
this is the big problem..say for some reason that ruth's 3rd-best season was one where he was a SP..obviously you'd want him as an OF (I'm sure this isn't the case, just saying)..that presents a problem.

wish we had thought of this beforehand.

maybe we can work something out where players who served dual-roles in their career, and the sim doesn't allow for it, we could have it be their 3rd-best year at that position the draftor requests? say for eck, his 3rd-best year as a RP, and for Babe, his 3rd-best year as an OF?

make sense?
I think this makes sense only with the pitching roles. So SP/RP, OF/SP, etc.Otherwise, people already made, or didn't make, draft choices based on the positional (C/1B/2B/SS/3B/OF) eligbility of players, and it wouldn't be fair to change it at this point.
well yeah, I agree..
I could go for that w/ pitchers. I think the only people it will effect are relief pitchers that started at the beginning of their career. I've already checked all your Babe Ruth types and nobody significant has a pitching year get in the way. W/ and Eck (or I guess a guy like Smoltz) I've got no problem if a guy wants to use a lesser salary to get the "reliever version" of that type of player if everybody agrees w/ it. I'm also not against going for "any season after 3rd highest salary" w/ position players, but if anybody is against it (and Harrier for one has said he is) I don't think it's fair to change the rules w/out unanimous agreement after it gets going.also adding in I didn't mean to go after Nipsey for questioning things. I come off as less than patient over a computer sometimes because I speak very plainly (and Nipsey likes to say this is being "holier than though" or something when actually it is just me being very literal). If he has legit questions over the rules that is cool. I don't think they are all that complicated...certainly not to the point where you can't fire a quick question to Cappy and then accept his judgement, but what do I know.
where in that does it say that you MUST use the third best reliever year? It says you can, not you must...
keep digging, bucko..
 
larry, everybody but you understood the rules a certain way.

maybe..just maybe you're wrong?  :loco:
ok, Capella, who are your three "relief" pitchers?What are thier 3 qualifying relief pitcher positions and which year are you using for them?
You are STILL (after hours and hours and hours) not catching the drift here, are you?
 
larry, everybody but you understood the rules a certain way.

maybe..just maybe you're wrong? :loco:
here is what was said:
Another problem comes in to play with players who were both SP and RP.

Dennis Eckersley's lights out 1990 season, complete with 0.61 ERA and 73/4 K/BB ratio, is salaried much lower than a bunch of mediocre starting pitching seasons. Clearly that was his best career season and one that shouldn't be allowed in our game.
this is the big problem..say for some reason that ruth's 3rd-best season was one where he was a SP..obviously you'd want him as an OF (I'm sure this isn't the case, just saying)..that presents a problem.

wish we had thought of this beforehand.

maybe we can work something out where players who served dual-roles in their career, and the sim doesn't allow for it, we could have it be their 3rd-best year at that position the draftor requests? say for eck, his 3rd-best year as a RP, and for Babe, his 3rd-best year as an OF?

make sense?
I think this makes sense only with the pitching roles. So SP/RP, OF/SP, etc.Otherwise, people already made, or didn't make, draft choices based on the positional (C/1B/2B/SS/3B/OF) eligbility of players, and it wouldn't be fair to change it at this point.
well yeah, I agree..
I could go for that w/ pitchers. I think the only people it will effect are relief pitchers that started at the beginning of their career. I've already checked all your Babe Ruth types and nobody significant has a pitching year get in the way. W/ and Eck (or I guess a guy like Smoltz) I've got no problem if a guy wants to use a lesser salary to get the "reliever version" of that type of player if everybody agrees w/ it. I'm also not against going for "any season after 3rd highest salary" w/ position players, but if anybody is against it (and Harrier for one has said he is) I don't think it's fair to change the rules w/out unanimous agreement after it gets going.also adding in I didn't mean to go after Nipsey for questioning things. I come off as less than patient over a computer sometimes because I speak very plainly (and Nipsey likes to say this is being "holier than though" or something when actually it is just me being very literal). If he has legit questions over the rules that is cool. I don't think they are all that complicated...certainly not to the point where you can't fire a quick question to Cappy and then accept his judgement, but what do I know.
where in that does it say that you MUST use the third best reliever year? It says you can, not you must...
keep digging, bucko..
where is it?or was it never said?

 
13 Members: Capella, larry_boy_44, thorn2000, Kilgore Trout, Paul Quantrill, Politician Spock, Aaron Rudnicki, The noD, John Martinez, ScottNorwood, IndividuallyWrapedKraftSingles, Truckasaurus II, Koya

:D

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top