Capella
Footballguy
gee larry, I don't have the page written down.you can assume if 15 of us are saying it, that it was probably true. we didn't just all make it up in our heads.where is it?or was it never said?keep digging, bucko..here is what was said:larry, everybody but you understood the rules a certain way.
maybe..just maybe you're wrong?
where in that does it say that you MUST use the third best reliever year? It says you can, not you must...I could go for that w/ pitchers. I think the only people it will effect are relief pitchers that started at the beginning of their career. I've already checked all your Babe Ruth types and nobody significant has a pitching year get in the way. W/ and Eck (or I guess a guy like Smoltz) I've got no problem if a guy wants to use a lesser salary to get the "reliever version" of that type of player if everybody agrees w/ it. I'm also not against going for "any season after 3rd highest salary" w/ position players, but if anybody is against it (and Harrier for one has said he is) I don't think it's fair to change the rules w/out unanimous agreement after it gets going.also adding in I didn't mean to go after Nipsey for questioning things. I come off as less than patient over a computer sometimes because I speak very plainly (and Nipsey likes to say this is being "holier than though" or something when actually it is just me being very literal). If he has legit questions over the rules that is cool. I don't think they are all that complicated...certainly not to the point where you can't fire a quick question to Cappy and then accept his judgement, but what do I know.well yeah, I agree..I think this makes sense only with the pitching roles. So SP/RP, OF/SP, etc.Otherwise, people already made, or didn't make, draft choices based on the positional (C/1B/2B/SS/3B/OF) eligbility of players, and it wouldn't be fair to change it at this point.this is the big problem..say for some reason that ruth's 3rd-best season was one where he was a SP..obviously you'd want him as an OF (I'm sure this isn't the case, just saying)..that presents a problem.Another problem comes in to play with players who were both SP and RP.
Dennis Eckersley's lights out 1990 season, complete with 0.61 ERA and 73/4 K/BB ratio, is salaried much lower than a bunch of mediocre starting pitching seasons. Clearly that was his best career season and one that shouldn't be allowed in our game.
wish we had thought of this beforehand.
maybe we can work something out where players who served dual-roles in their career, and the sim doesn't allow for it, we could have it be their 3rd-best year at that position the draftor requests? say for eck, his 3rd-best year as a RP, and for Babe, his 3rd-best year as an OF?
make sense?

