What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***OFFICIAL*** FFA MLB Draft (3 Viewers)

Larry, there are two issues here. Lets not co mingle them.

You have some ground to stand on, even if some think the Quantrill deal was shady. He is a good sim player. That is fine by me.

About reporting - when you decide to join a group of guys to do a draft - even a mess around online draft - when furthermore, you all put 12 bucks down, and use one thread as your common forum, if some things get a little "out of hand" why not keep it in the clubhouse?

No need to go reporting, and risking getting the thread shut down. That hurts everyone. If you have an issue, state it here. If you get ridiculed or whatever, then hopefully suck it up and just deal. We have to agree to get along here if we are to do this draft. Somewhat at least. Some kind of stupid online code. I am sure you would like to be involved in future drafts and things like this, with FBGs. Dont know that reporting things even if you "have a right to" is the best course of action. Just my opinion.

Guess I am just surprised.

Im out for the night too.
yes, I probably have been a little thin-skinned...but some of the stuff in here has been outright wrong on these boards (the straight-up porn links) and deserved to be reported and I'm surprised the people who posted it weren't banned (it must be nice to have pull around here...)

some of the other stuff pro'lly shouldn't have been reported...

and I"m sorry for that... and maybe I was a little naive thinking that they wouldn't delete this thread... if I honestly thought they would, I wouldn't have reported anything...
Are you new here Larry? Porn links are supposed to be sent directly to gray@footballguys.com.
I only clicked on one... then reported it... and didn't click back...a) they weren't that good...
What qualifications do you have to make that assessment?
I could be remembering wrong... I dunno...I don't remember the one I saw being that great, though...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I only clicked on one... then reported it... and didn't click back...

a) they weren't that good...

b) I really wasn't interested in looking at it...
Anyone else find these two statements contradictory?
why? I saw a link and clicked... lolI'm generally pretty unquestioning when clicking links on this board... they are 99.999999999% of the time ok to click...

 
I only clicked on one... then reported it... and didn't click back...

a) they weren't that good...

b) I really wasn't interested in looking at it...
Anyone else find these two statements contradictory?
why? I saw a link and clicked... lolI'm generally pretty unquestioning when clicking links on this board... they are 99.999999999% of the time ok to click...
My brain has officially self-destructed.
 
:waiting:
LB, I think you better send Mr Gray some pr0n pr0nt0. He doesn't like to be kept waiting, especially when pr0n links are involved.the future of this thread could depend on it

 
I only clicked on one... then reported it... and didn't click back...

a) they weren't that good...

b) I really wasn't interested in looking at it...
Anyone else find these two statements contradictory?
why? I saw a link and clicked... lolI'm generally pretty unquestioning when clicking links on this board... they are 99.999999999% of the time ok to click...
The statement "They weren't that good" implies, at least the way I read it, that there must have been some interest on the viewer's part...at least enough to not only click on it and view it, but to render opinion and decide on the image's quality and/or merit...Bottom line? Larry boy LOVES pRon!

 
:waiting:
LB, I think you better send Mr Gray some pr0n pr0nt0. He doesn't like to be kept waiting, especially when pr0n links are involved.the future of this thread could depend on it
I quite honestly don't have any porn links... :rotflmao: I am almost 100% sure the stuff that got posted was deleted...

 
pr0n.. THERE WAS PR0N IN HERE??   :unsure:
Still is!
PM please.
:waiting:
Searching....I'm up to page 12.....
unless you are referring to the stuff that they hid (don't know where that is)you need to go to where the draft was over and we were waiting to start... :rotflmao:
are you being ####ing serious?gray, IP this guy please. I have all sorts of pr0n coming your way in that case. :ph34r:
Really only interested as I have been led to believe that it pertains to the milkers draft.:fetish:

 
pr0n.. THERE WAS PR0N IN HERE?? :unsure:
Still is!
PM please.
:waiting:
Searching....I'm up to page 12.....
unless you are referring to the stuff that they hid (don't know where that is)you need to go to where the draft was over and we were waiting to start... :rotflmao:
are you being ####ing serious?gray, IP this guy please. I have all sorts of pr0n coming your way in that case. :ph34r:
Really only interested as I have been led to believe that it pertains to the milkers draft.:fetish:
I'm pretty sure they deleted it after it got reported...ask Nipsey, I'm pretty sure he posted it (him or Pickles, I think they were the ones in the milker draft... don't remember)...

either way I'm off to bed, too... *sleepy*

later...

 
you can sort the threads by # of views and by # of posts.

This thread has nearly doubled the 2nd longest FFA thread: LINK

However, this thread still has a long ways to go to catch the Hooters thread for most views ever.

 
WTF just happened here?
larry was called a cheater (among other things)he reported a couple posts

this entire thread almost got deleted

people got mad at LB

he apologized

Clayton signed up for Milker's Draft 2: Electric Boogaloo

Spock searched for pr0n and came up empty through the first 23 pages of this thread

 
BTW, just so it's *** OFFICIAL ***, I think larry cheated like a ******* with Quantrill.It just so happens that Smoltz' 1.12 ERA 0.87 WHIP season is his third best as a reliever. Like I said many pages ago, the number of IP totally skews the salaries.

 
13,000 posts and this thing finally starts to get interesting....Keep up the good work you three.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Larry -

I never posted porn in the thread. NEVER. You have me confused with someone else.

I did run (yes Pickles, "run") the Milker draft and there wasn't porn there either. Only sweet, sweet semi-clothed milkers.

Thirdly, the Eck rule was put in place specifically to prevent what you did with Quantrill. It's so you don't get a #1 season from a guy who's played multiple positions. If you want to argue that you're right because the sim positional needs have to be filled and most of us drafted more starters than relievers, well that's incredibly cheap. You are using Quantrill as a reliever and NOT as a starter. You're simply circumventing the rule, because most all of us drafted more starters than relievers. It's cheap and, all kidding aside, you don't deserve to be in the next league as Capella said. You're simply wrong here Larry and should should fix the problem.

Find one other guy in the league who agrees with you and lets hear him try to back you up, because you're making no sense and you're breaking all of our hearts in the process.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can't argue with this idiot anymore. It's like speaking to a brick wall, only dumber.
and you still havne't shown where you said it...right now, you, Nipsey, Harrier, & UCONN have said I cheated...

I might have missed a few people, but that is far from a concensus...
And only you have said that you didn't...4-1 so far...

looks like a mandate...
Another. Let's just play w/o him next time and be done with it.
 
Just for the record, I think Quantrill goes against the spirit of the draft. If Larry continues to be this good I'll be stunned.

 
Can someone bring me up to speed on how LB cheated?
Instead of using 3rd best season as a reliever he used 3rd best season overall. It was agreed too early on that for pitchers who were used in multiple roles you had to use either the 3rd best season as a starter OR his 3rd best season as a reliever. NOT the 3rd best season overall. Larry decided he didn't like that and since it was never ratified, stamped and signed by a notary republic he said screw it and used 3rd best season overall.
 
ALSO

YOU GUYS SHOULD

CHECK OUT THE NEW LET'S GO DYNASTY LEAGUE

I'll even provide a link. Because I love you. Oh so much.

Let's Go: Football 2

It's a fantasy football dynasty league. Which, as you know, has never been done before.

Join now.

Seriously.
You guys must have missed this. Seriously.
I saw it, just seemed like a lot of reading for this hour. I'm interested though, but I don't know exactly what it is. (need to read it)
Yeah, you don't really need to read the whole thing to get the gist of it. Basically, I've commished the Let's Go dynasty league, and it's been a huge success aside from the unbalanced trades some people have performed, so now I'm starting vers. 2.0 in order to replicate the good part and eliminate the bad.
When would it start?
Initial veteran draft ASAP, rookie draft first week of May
I may be out of town for a while in May, not sure if I can do a draft then.
Well, the main draft is now anyway. I'm sure the May one (which is just five rounds) could be worked around for you.Only 7 spots left, fellas. Join up.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My team has been incredibly streaky. Win 3, lose three. Win 7, lose 7. Almost all of my loses came in three series sweeps.

 
ALSO

YOU GUYS SHOULD

CHECK OUT THE NEW LET'S GO DYNASTY LEAGUE

I'll even provide a link.  Because I love you.  Oh so much.

Let's Go: Football 2

It's a fantasy football dynasty league.  Which, as you know, has never been done before.

Join now.

Seriously.
You guys must have missed this. Seriously.
I saw it, just seemed like a lot of reading for this hour. I'm interested though, but I don't know exactly what it is. (need to read it)
Yeah, you don't really need to read the whole thing to get the gist of it. Basically, I've commished the Let's Go dynasty league, and it's been a huge success aside from the unbalanced trades some people have performed, so now I'm starting vers. 2.0 in order to replicate the good part and eliminate the bad.
When would it start?
Initial veteran draft ASAP, rookie draft first week of May
I may be out of town for a while in May, not sure if I can do a draft then.
Well, the main draft is now anyway. I'm sure the May one (which is just five rounds) could be worked around for you.Only 7 spots left, fellas. Join up.
Sounds fun, I just don't think I have the time right now but thanks for the invite.
 
Another. Let's just play w/o him next time and be done with it.
Agree with Funkley and Spock's takes about larry_boy's use of Quantrill.That said, I also agree with Sammy -- there's no durned way that Quantrill is responsible for LB's team's record to date ... and what goes up must come down. How much difference could Quantrill really be making? I know he's statistically good so far, but still.

 
Here are updated standings...for those of you who forgot:

1. You get one point for a win against one of the 20 real teams

2. you lose 1 point for a loss against one of the 20 real teams

3. You lose 2 points for a loss agaisnt one of the 4 dummy teams

First number is total, second is games back from Larry (I can't believe i just wrote that):

Larry_Boy_44's 13

Bellucci's 5 -8

Kobayashi 4 -9

Maranville 4 -9

Irish Cowboys 3 -10

Pickles 3 -10

Koya's 1 -12

The Goodfellas 1 -12

BRINGIN' 0 -13

Cryogenics 0 -13

Taurasi's -1 -14

Bullet Joe's -3 -16

Curse Reversing Idiots -3 -16

Nips -4 -17

Pumpnicks -4 -17

Spartans -4 -17

N.O. -5 -18

Newmies -6 -19

Balitmore Badgers -7 -20

Leftovers -9 -22

Nipsey is really hurt by 2 losses to the dummy teams.

I can tabulate the number of games played agaisnt dummy teams is people want, but I need some excel help.

 
Another. Let's just play w/o him next time and be done with it.
Agree with Funkley and Spock's takes about larry_boy's use of Quantrill.That said, I also agree with Sammy -- there's no durned way that Quantrill is responsible for LB's team's record to date ... and what goes up must come down. How much difference could Quantrill really be making? I know he's statistically good so far, but still.
This is not meant to get Larry all mad, but just looking at his stats, can anyone explain how he is 8 games better than the rest of us?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top