I think while people want to keep it as an "actual MLB All-Time Greats draft", that's an impossibility. As long as people will sim fish or stat fish, the guys who are drafting on name value and historical baseball perception will lose every time. My site is based on one thing: numbers.
An All-Time Greats draft can be very much based on numbers. I propose setting minimum career standards for all drafted players. It will take some research to establish reasonable baselines, but here's an off-the-cuff idea to qualify batters:
Any one of the following conditions qualifies a batter
1) All HOF batters qualify, or
2) All league MVPs qualify, or
3) 7000 AB, or
4) 1700 H, or
5) 300 HR, or
6) 1000 RBI, or
7) 400 SB
That would eliminate the following guys, both of whom have one sparkling season, but less-stellar career numbers
OF Brady Anderson (career)
6499 AB
1661 H
210 HR
761 RBI
1062 R
315 SB
Jim Gentile (career)
2922 AB
759 H
179 HR
549 RBI
434 R
3 SB
A similar scheme might be worked out for pitchers:
1) All HOF pitchers qualify, or
2) All league MVPs qualify, or
3) All Cy Young winners qualify, or
4) 2000 IP, or
5) 160 wins, or
6) 1500 K, or
7) 600 games pitched in