I had an interesting idea to eliminate some of the sim-fishing for version 2.0. We could randomize which year you get. You pick the guy, then roll the dice. Whatever number you get is the year. We could use the first 3,4,5, etc. cutoff.
You want to roll the dice with Brady Anderson, be my guest.
####.What's the point of it being random? Or the point of doing a whole draft only to have it be decided by chance? For the dude that gets consistently 5th and 4th years despite drafting way better players than the guy who gets consistently 1st and 2nd years, what do you tell him? The whole point of doing a sim, or of having any method to evaluate a draft after it happens, is to determine who had the best draft. Leaving it up to chance lops off that possibility, and little else valuable remains.
Harrier makes too much sense sometimes.
Negative.I'd take that over simfishing.
People want an All-Time MLB Draft that can be run on WIS. Not an All-Time WIS draft, that can be run on WIS.
If we all wanted that, we could just go sign up tomorrow and play. Simfishing ruins the idea of the league. Look at Harrier's pitching for an example. And that's why he is fighting the idea of a random year. He knows it would kill his strategy.
WHY CAN'T YOU JUST SEE THIS?