What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** OFFICIAL *** FFA WAGERING THREAD - Merry Christmas!!! (5 Viewers)

@TheGooRoo or @jamil anything to see here

Rush + Pass

Watson -80.5 (-120) vs Hurts (-120)

Rush Yards

Scarbrough -24.5 (-135) vs Gallman (-105)

Pass Yards

Renfrow -10.5 (-120) vs Deiter (-120)

Stewart -15.5 (-135) vs Scott (-105)

Williams -15.5 (-155) vs Ridley (+110)

 
Not big on Harris.  There's enough comparisons out there to show Clemson can get dinged by Harris-like backs, hope he starts slow and isn't the hot hand.  With 60 yards, it only takes that 1 run.
i've only seen sub 60's today. No go for me there. I mean just last week i played him at u90.

 
Hard time getting a feel for this game. I, like seemingly everybody also have a suspicion Clemson pulls it out. I'm going to play some Alt Line Clemson
spreads, but I've got futures bets from before the season on Bama at 5.5-1 and any ACC team at 4-1 so I won't go crazy there. I'm leaning under, so my
props are slanted that way, with either Clemson winning or the game being really close so no real pass funnel game flow. Here's what I'm on for props, and
I don't give a #### about juice because A)It's the last CFB game of the season and B)You only pay juice if you LOSE #####es. Here goes:

DWatson U274.5 (EV)
DWatson U50.5  (+115)
Gallman  U2   (-105)
D. Harris U64.5 (-155)
D. Harris U1.5  (-150)
OJ Howard O35.5 (-175)
Ridley   U49.5  (-115)
Dieter  U1.5  (+120)
Dieter   U22.5  (-130)

Bama  TT U28.5  (EV)

Clemson win by 1-6 (+350)
Clemson win by 7-12 (+750)
Clemson win by 13-18 (+1200)
 
That's so much action, that's crazy!!!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So looks like I need Bama to win by more than 6 in a high-scoring game with a bunch of props going under except for that one guy Goo posted should be a fun night

 
So looks like I need Bama to win by more than 6 in a high-scoring game with a bunch of props going under except for that one guy Goo posted should be a fun night
I'm already nervous, I've got a lot bet on this game, hoping for a big night to fund a surprise trip to Disney

 
Haven't placed a bet since the Knicks on Friday. That's probably the longest I've gone without since the MLB ASB a few years ago. Just grabbed the tackles under. What else is it. I guess I'll back the Clemson with y'all. Yo, check out this histogram of points scored versus 'Bama the L2 seasons though: link

That's pretty scarce. Only five teams have gone > 21 versus 'Bama the L2 seasons.

 
Has anyone played the over.

Since last season opposing teams have gone 11-17-1 ATS and 11-17-1 O/U versus 'Bama:
Scoring > 14: 4-5 ATS and 8-1 O/U
Scoring ≤ 14: 7-12-1 ATS and 3-16-1 O/U

If you go back to 2007 when Saban got there, opposing teams have gone 59-70-5 O/U:
Scoring ≤ 20: 34-63-3 O/U
Scoring > 20: 25-7-2 O/U

 
You can get Alabama -160 for the first half. Roll the winnings into ML at half and you'll likely land close to a + number.

ETA: Half is -175, ignore that.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Clemson/Swinney 17-10 ATS as the dog (11-2 ATS getting ≥ 5 points):
Reg Season: 10-10 ATS
Postseason: 6-1 SU and 7-0 ATS

They scored freakin' 40 points on 'Bama in the Championship last year. Check out the scoring in that game:

1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q
CLEM 14 0 10 16
BAMA 7 7 7 24


I think I'm going dog + over

 
Sorry man.  I just cut my dog's nail too short and it bled for damn near an hour.  O 3.5 sacks, deshaun o23.5, leggett o 2.5 and 3 and 37-43, Renfroe o 30, deshaun u 54 rushing, allen u 6.5 sacks
Thanks Goo.  Anything you give us is gravy.  For real, it is appreciated.

 
Sorry man.  I just cut my dog's nail too short and it bled for damn near an hour.  O 3.5 sacks, deshaun o23.5, leggett o 2.5 and 3 and 37-43, Renfroe o 30, deshaun u 54 rushing, allen u 6.5 sacks
Switched to an electric filer type thing and it's been smooth sailing since.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top