What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** OFFICIAL *** FFA WAGERING THREAD - Merry Christmas!!! (2 Viewers)

on all of these public lines, I've noticed that sometimes Wagertalk is occasionally really off from what ESPN/SportsInsights is reporting.  Case in point for Iowa/UF.  WT saying 63% of the public is on Iowa, where ESPN saying that 46% is on Iowa.  But their other #s are pretty similar.  

Any insight?

 
Last night I placed bets fading all of the public plays (except for USC which I had already placed early and am just going to ride):

Iowa and Over

West Mich and Over

Under USC/UPS

Auburn and Under

 
putting in a bunch of props at BOL and I'm used to just hitting risk max limit on the props, I then put a bet in on Oklahoma -1.5 and out of instinct hit risk max limit and submit....I experienced a hot second of panic and excitement when I wagered 15k on a football game(would have really put my no hedge stance on the line)  Thank god I don't have 15k in my acct. 

 
I went under 15.5 Beathard, i think Florida is susceptible to the run with their injuries. Iowa will try to pound the rock. I see BOL just came out at 13.5 for Beathard.

 
I went under 15.5 Beathard, i think Florida is susceptible to the run with their injuries. Iowa will try to pound the rock. I see BOL just came out at 13.5 for Beathard.
I'm in at U15. Was hoping to find an U yards prop but none of my outs have one.

 
on all of these public lines, I've noticed that sometimes Wagertalk is occasionally really off from what ESPN/SportsInsights is reporting.  Case in point for Iowa/UF.  WT saying 63% of the public is on Iowa, where ESPN saying that 46% is on Iowa.  But their other #s are pretty similar.  

Any insight?
If you are using these numbers for a contrarian angle, I suggest using as many of the sources I posted before as possible. I've seen some games where it appears the percentages are flipped at one site (say 65%, 70%, 75%, 25%).  That way you aren't really guessing if you should fade one side or not.

 
Sportsbookreview is probably the best imo.  Their consensus data seems to come from slightly sharper books as the splits aren't nearly as massive.

 Sportsinsights, Pregame and Wagertalk are a few other free ones.  Sportsbook.ag also has them under "Betting Trends" but you need to have an account to see them.

Sportsinsights and William Hill will Tweet bet % and money % occasionally for select games on Twitter.
bump.

thx for posting @tjnc09

 
College football really is an unbelievable game in this era we got the big 12 and PAC 10 teams putting up 100 120 points a game and then we got Iowa Florida who can't get more than 3 yards a play.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Florida 2H +1/2

I don't see Iowa doing anything unless it's via turnovers, I think Gators start to pull away a bit.

 
WMU with 6-10 minute drives.

franklin touching the ball only 4 times but at 12 per

Wisconsin deciding not to run Clement on first down in the whole 2q 

wtf is going on here

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm heated too.  Just goes to shown on matter how good it looks a RB over is never truly a great play.

What do we like for the rose bowl.

 
I'm heated too.  Just goes to shown on matter how good it looks a RB over is never truly a great play.

What do we like for the rose bowl.
Do all these INTs count as Beathard completions?  (lollll)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I, facook, do solemnly swear I will never.......EEEEEEEEEVER.....bet on Kirk Ferentz in a bowl again.  What a rube.

 
I at lease got part of the parlay money back

 

 
W Michigan +8 (-110) Cancelled 

 
W Michigan/Wisconsin u54 (-110) Win

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top