Yeah - needless to say they have been hammeredAnd Franklin down to 67.5.
I have to check back.its uncanny. Good calls on the sides, though!
Count me in.I don't have access to sportsbook.ag lines but if I did I'd bet that McCarron u3.5 -140
Good call here, I played it at -130 early for a max $50. BOL has it at 2.5.I don't have access to sportsbook.ag lines but if I did I'd bet that McCarron u3.5 -140
I'm in at U15. Was hoping to find an U yards prop but none of my outs have one.I went under 15.5 Beathard, i think Florida is susceptible to the run with their injuries. Iowa will try to pound the rock. I see BOL just came out at 13.5 for Beathard.
i cant even log in?SB is just doing so it can take my money in live betting
If you are using these numbers for a contrarian angle, I suggest using as many of the sources I posted before as possible. I've seen some games where it appears the percentages are flipped at one site (say 65%, 70%, 75%, 25%). That way you aren't really guessing if you should fade one side or not.on all of these public lines, I've noticed that sometimes Wagertalk is occasionally really off from what ESPN/SportsInsights is reporting. Case in point for Iowa/UF. WT saying 63% of the public is on Iowa, where ESPN saying that 46% is on Iowa. But their other #s are pretty similar.
Any insight?
bump.Sportsbookreview is probably the best imo. Their consensus data seems to come from slightly sharper books as the splits aren't nearly as massive.
Sportsinsights, Pregame and Wagertalk are a few other free ones. Sportsbook.ag also has them under "Betting Trends" but you need to have an account to see them.
Sportsinsights and William Hill will Tweet bet % and money % occasionally for select games on Twitter.
7.5wow what a play, then nice missed kick.. Didnt think the 8.5 would come into play
Do all these INTs count as Beathard completions? (lollll)I'm heated too. Just goes to shown on matter how good it looks a RB over is never truly a great play.
What do we like for the rose bowl.