lumpy19
Footballguy
Well NOW it's going to catch me, thanks buddyIs it just me or does the 1st glance of JaxBillys avatar have a phallic inspiration? It catches me every damn time.
Well NOW it's going to catch me, thanks buddyIs it just me or does the 1st glance of JaxBillys avatar have a phallic inspiration? It catches me every damn time.
I aim to please. Looks like the monkey does too.Well NOW it's going to catch me, thanks buddy
There's a joke about still seeing a #### but imma let the joke go.I'm feeling more clueless than ever.
spot foul.Weird...so ESPN is showing Wentz with a rush for 21 yards...but that play had a holding penalty, doesn't that negate the run stats? Don't matter to me, just curious.
Spot foul, so he gets the yards up until the hold.Weird...so ESPN is showing Wentz with a rush for 21 yards...but that play had a holding penalty, doesn't that negate the run stats? Don't matter to me, just curious.
So if he rode out to the house for 80 yards and the penalty was 11 yards downfield...it'd be 1st and 10 from own 21 with the QBer having an 80 yard run on the drive?spot foul.
Look at the ESPN playxplay...it says he ran for 21 yards, pushed OB. So that was the entire length of the run he was credited for. Did Alshon hold after Wentz went by or something? Sorry i'm so confused here.Spot foul, so he gets the yards up until the hold.
I believe he gets credit for the run up until the spot of the penalty. Then they mark off ten yards for the penalty. Then they check to see if anfirst down is made.Look at the ESPN playxplay...it says he ran for 21 yards, pushed OB. So that was the entire length of the run he was credited for. Did Alshon hold after Wentz went by or something? Sorry i'm so confused here.
And the ref's last name ends in a vowel.Dan Lambskin said:We got this. Sharps aren't always on their right side
Thanks man. That could be nice. I can only go back to 1989, but still got 33-17-1 (.660) for both the ATS and O/U. I want to dive into time zones and opponent winning percentages and ####. On the teams that didn't cover, it was usually because they couldn't get to 10. I want to know how many points you think each of those teams can score. Was really looking for something for SNF too so this is cool. You think the Giants can score two touchdowns?Per Dr Bob on Beating The Book: non-division winless (0-5 or worse) road dogs are 50-18 acts since 1980. NYG +12 @ChainsawU. Might even get to 13 or 14. ETA: Applies to Browns and Niners too.
Just weird. Seemed so effective and they stop using him...why am I complaining?hope so
He took a 15yd penalty at the end of a drive and I think they benched him for a little bit thereJust weird. Seemed so effective and they stop using him...why am I complaining?
Wow, just saw this. Think I have a half of one at blockchain.Poor timing to have no Bitcoin
49ers making back to back trips across the country for 1pm Eastern starts. Also coming off back to back OT games while Washington is coming off their bye. Tough spot.This is the most Gruden/Redskins have given any opposing team. Road dogs 7-6 SU and 9-4 ATS versus Gruden (4-3 SU and 6-1 ATS when Josh Norman logs zero tackles).
49ers +425
49ers +11 -110
I doubt it, I figure maybe 10-13 somehow. Everything in me screams that Denver rolls easily so NYG probably the right side cause I'm Joe Public.Thanks man. That could be nice. I can only go back to 1989, but still got 33-17-1 (.660) for both the ATS and O/U. I want to dive into time zones and opponent winning percentages and ####. On the teams that didn't cover, it was usually because they couldn't get to 10. I want to know how many points you think each of those teams can score. Was really looking for something for SNF too so this is cool. You think the Giants can score two touchdowns?
jerksFriday night CFB with the #2 ranked team and not many sites offering player props![]()
Money.I don't think Cuse gets more than 14, so I'm on TT under 17 and game total Under 58.
Also on over 54 is WSU/Cal.
Can't figure out sides...I lean both dogs but just gonna stay away.