This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Do you jerk off on your guns? It sounds like you do.Looking forward to going to pick up my Colt M4 Light Carbine AR-15 sometime this week.Got some Troy Industries Flip Down Battle Sights for it and will be taking it out to a buddy's land where they've got a nice 100yd shooting range set up alongside their runway and 9 hole golf course. Not sure on which optics I'll be getting just yet... will be trying a few out.
Nice!! Where are you buying it from and how much if you don't mind? ThanksLooking forward to going to pick up my Colt M4 Light Carbine AR-15 sometime this week.
Open carry - The main reason I believe for this is in case someone who has a permit to conceal carry accidentally shows he is carrying. If that is the case he will not be committing a crime, he would be open carrying with a CCW.
My takeaway for the lowering of age is for protection on college campuses where the youngest age is 18-19 years old.
Nothing on there that says any student can carry on campus if they hold a CCP. However, it is important if there will be further legislation brought up in the future about anyone being able to carry.
![[icon]](/data/avatars/m/5/5167.jpg?1660313464){kind=avatar}
Well, this is some childish posting here. I was unaware our forum here was so popular with grade schoolers.Do you jerk off on your guns? It sounds like you do.Looking forward to going to pick up my Colt M4 Light Carbine AR-15 sometime this week.
Colt LE-6900 was ordered from Whitaker Guns in KY. Paid $849 new (MSRP 899) which is a great price in this environment. It's currently paid for and sitting at my FFL and I just need to go pick it up. Troy Battle Sights were ordered from them for a touch over $200 for the set. For optics, I'll likely just start with a Primary Arms Micro Dot when they are back in stock in a couple weeks.Nice!! Where are you buying it from and how much if you don't mind? ThanksLooking forward to going to pick up my Colt M4 Light Carbine AR-15 sometime this week.
Thanks for the info!!! Great price for the Colt!!Colt LE-6900 was ordered from Whitaker Guns in KY. Paid $849 new (MSRP 899) which is a great price in this environment. It's currently paid for and sitting at my FFL and I just need to go pick it up. Troy Battle Sights were ordered from them for a touch over $200 for the set. For optics, I'll likely just start with a Primary Arms Micro Dot when they are back in stock in a couple weeks.Nice!! Where are you buying it from and how much if you don't mind? ThanksLooking forward to going to pick up my Colt M4 Light Carbine AR-15 sometime this week.
My handgun target shooting skills have improved by orders of magnitude thanks to some classes. Now I'm looking to home my longer range marksmanship.
I feel safer. That mod costs $190? That's $190 less the morons who feel they need this crap have less to spend on ammo.
Did it ever occur to you that a lot of us don't feel that we NEED it, but that we simply WANT it? I am not under any impression that I'll be part of a rebellion, firing upon govt soldiers with my newly purchased AR. Ever. I do, however, enjoy the sport of shooting them.
I'm from SW Va - I'm fairly certain I spent more time in blinds and fired more rounds before age 13 than you have in your entire life combined.
The point you should take from that gun is that the whole idea of an "assault rifle" is nonsense. It's all based on how a gun looks rather than its capabilities.
Awesome. Now would you mind putting your eRooster away and opening your eyes to the actual point of my post?
No, I'm no longer a hunter. I was just letting Mr. "did it ever occur to you" know that yes, his drivel has "occurred to me".
My arguement is the VAST VAST majority of gun owners ARE responsible. The number of accidental gun deaths (~850 in 2011) annually in the US is 80% less than those killed on Motorcycles (~4500) despite gun owners dramatically outnumbering motorcyclists.The fact that some cyclists are irresponsible with regards to helmets/driving technique causing deaths of themselves and others at a rate 5 times that of firearms doesn't seem to strike up any issue. My point is both are very legitimate hobbies with purposes far outside the "only purpose is to kill people" assertion laid out by some in this thread. You can address the intentional deaths by firearms but given the dubious nature of any claims that banning would have a significant impact on crime, coupled with the fact that gun crime is largely contained to the criminal culture. (over 90% of gun violence victims are felons, and over 90% of gun homicide suspect are felons (who didn't procure the gun through channels blocked by legislation in the first place). Considering that 70-80 Million adults have chosen to own a firearms for protection (67%), target shooting (66%) or hunting (58%)... that seems like a massive subset of Americans to deny the right to own a firearm because of a exceedingly limited number of preventable gun related deaths impacting the general populace. Just my opinion of course
The fact that ~80 million american adults choose to exercise their right to legally and responsibly own guns and participate in legitimate gun-related hobbies/sport is drivel? Okay. There is a reason the NRA is so well funded....
The "morons" have a specific constitutional right to buy this stuff which people such as yourself have failed to articulate a compelling argument in favor of repealing.
Do they have a right not to get struck by lightning? Because they're twice as likely to experience that than death by gun.
Actually those people have a zero percent chance to get hit by lightning because they 100% experienced death by gun.
What well regulated militia do those morons belong to?
In the majority opinion authored by Justice Antonin Scalia, the Court first conducted a textual analysis of the operative clause, "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The Court found that this language guarantees an individual right to possess and carry weapons. The Court examined historical evidence that it found consistent with its textual analysis. The Court then considered the Second Amendment’s prefatory clause, "[a] well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State," and determined that while this clause announces a purpose for recognizing an individual right to keep and bear arms, it does not limit the operative clause. The Court found that analogous contemporaneous provisions in state constitutions, the Second Amendment’s drafting history, and post-ratification interpretations were consistent with its interpretation of the amendment. The Court asserted that its prior precedent was not inconsistent with its interpretation.
Maybe part of the problem is that the NRA doesn't want existing gun laws enforced?
If people accidentally dying as a result of neglect in the homes of others, then surely you're concerned about the 3,533 accidental drownings that occur annually... considering how much of a bigger problem that is than gun deaths (4x more likely). Those people had a right to not drown as a result of something used for recreation at the homes of the people they visit right?
Good thing no one ever disagrees with the SC.In the majority opinion authored by Justice Antonin Scalia, the Court first conducted a textual analysis of the operative clause, "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The Court found that this language guarantees an individual right to possess and carry weapons. The Court examined historical evidence that it found consistent with its textual analysis. The Court then considered the Second Amendments prefatory clause, "[a] well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State," and determined that while this clause announces a purpose for recognizing an individual right to keep and bear arms, it does not limit the operative clause. The Court found that analogous contemporaneous provisions in state constitutions, the Second Amendments drafting history, and post-ratification interpretations were consistent with its interpretation of the amendment. The Court asserted that its prior precedent was not inconsistent with its interpretation.
- Supreme Court Ruling as Hosted at the Library of Congress
It's common for those with a less than stellar grasp of law to inaccurately interpret that clause, but I assure you the foremost experts are all over it.
Nobody said you couldn't disagree with them. Thankfully they, the more educated and possessing of legally sound reason, are the ones making the laws.Good thing no one ever disagrees with the SC.In the majority opinion authored by Justice Antonin Scalia, the Court first conducted a textual analysis of the operative clause, "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The Court found that this language guarantees an individual right to possess and carry weapons. The Court examined historical evidence that it found consistent with its textual analysis. The Court then considered the Second Amendments prefatory clause, "[a] well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State," and determined that while this clause announces a purpose for recognizing an individual right to keep and bear arms, it does not limit the operative clause. The Court found that analogous contemporaneous provisions in state constitutions, the Second Amendments drafting history, and post-ratification interpretations were consistent with its interpretation of the amendment. The Court asserted that its prior precedent was not inconsistent with its interpretation.
- Supreme Court Ruling as Hosted at the Library of Congress
It's common for those with a less than stellar grasp of law to inaccurately interpret that clause, but I assure you the foremost experts are all over it.
Impressive. You found an idiot columnist for a four page long Benton County Arkansas Newsletter. What flavor cookie would you like
You should probably just stick with threads like those about Game of Thrones. They're more your speed.
How dare you insult the Republican Party like that!Nobody said you couldn't disagree with them. Thankfully they, the more educated and possessing of legally sound reason, are the ones making the laws.Good thing no one ever disagrees with the SC.In the majority opinion authored by Justice Antonin Scalia, the Court first conducted a textual analysis of the operative clause, "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The Court found that this language guarantees an individual right to possess and carry weapons. The Court examined historical evidence that it found consistent with its textual analysis. The Court then considered the Second Amendments prefatory clause, "[a] well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State," and determined that while this clause announces a purpose for recognizing an individual right to keep and bear arms, it does not limit the operative clause. The Court found that analogous contemporaneous provisions in state constitutions, the Second Amendments drafting history, and post-ratification interpretations were consistent with its interpretation of the amendment. The Court asserted that its prior precedent was not inconsistent with its interpretation.
- Supreme Court Ruling as Hosted at the Library of Congress
It's common for those with a less than stellar grasp of law to inaccurately interpret that clause, but I assure you the foremost experts are all over it.
You should probably just stick with threads like those about Game of Thrones. They're more your speed.
What does the columnist have to do with it?Impressive. You found an idiot columnist for a four page long Benton County Arkansas Newsletter. What flavor cookie would you like
this would be an argument of the extreme. Obviously most law abiding gun owners wouldnt' agree with said politician. Like most muslims wouldn't agree with what the two jokers that blew up the Boston Marathon.
Yeah! Let's ban all guns to focus on a teeny tiny corner of the violence spectrum.
Armed robberies Gun assaults
