What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official*** Holy Grail Redux WW Game Thread (1 Viewer)

Hodor said:
CGRdrJoe said:
SacramentoBob said:
D2 Unofficial, okay this one is accurate I swear, the other Bob vote count

bucky (7) - EG72, culdeus, Sand, Conn, McGarnicle, Loan, Bender
Sp00fy (5) - Worm, bry*, Merlin, SacBob*, icon
IB (2) - hag, fred
sacbob (1) - bucky
Zed (1) - CGRdr

YTV - everyone else

bry proxies to Worm*
SacBob proxies to bucky*
Click to expand...
bg sweet spot
Click to expand...
whoa whoa whoa, I am reading back through Joes posts and this stands out big time.

Joe voted Bucky D1, thought he was bad, but here is D2 saying three GG players are BG cause they voted bucky.

1. Did he suddenly clear Bucky as GG?

2. He should have no f'ing clue whether bucky is good or not!

This reeks of a BG knowing Bucky's alignment and already trying to put the suspicion on those voting him. This is something that VI (from Pack) often accidentally does as a BG.
Click to expand...
read that too fast, not three GG players, there is a BG in there. But that is even worse as BGs often DOS a group of players with one being BG imo

 
D1
- votes GG Bucky, joins the game and jumps on a train
- unvotes, stays off any otis train

D2
- votes Zed, says he is still convinced he is bad, but I dont see any other posts saying he is bad? Weird imo
- sits as loan vote on GG Zed
- whoa whoa, red flag. He higlights three GG players at end of bucky lynch without knowing bucky alignment
- DOS on Dan Lambskin
- HE ENDS UP VOTING BUCKY AGAIN AND SAYS THE STALL ON HIM IS TELLING WTMF

D3
- posts a bg list consisting of GG Zed, GG Yuk, GG Manback, GG Hulk and BG Rascal
- says GG Hulk is bad, GG Zed is bad and GG sand is bad
- threatens to vote GG Manback
- votes GG Worm
- says GG Harry and GG Acer are bg teammates

D4
- Votes Acer
- votes BG Rascal
- unvotes BG Rascal and says we need to figure out who had grenade
- votes Acer, says tomorrow its GG Zed
- moves back to Rascal

D5
- votes BG Foos
- defends BG Loan saying BGs are trying to get him lynched without words
- bumps a post from icon saying it locks foos as a BG. STRANGE IMO. very weird to lock him as bg from that post.
- then votes BG Loan Shark wtf, as if he wanted to be on the lynch.

D6
- Says Foos should be killed with nade (Foos was protected fyi)
- votes BG Hags for claim
- quicky unvotes after his claim and stays off

D7
- votes GG Zed
- bumps Norms list "just so he can find it"
- votes hags
- unvotes?
- votes hags again
- calls out EG for his list post, then says Witz or myself should go next. (cause of Norm list)

D8
- Votes GG Me solely based on Norms list. ALARM ALARM ALARM
- Suddenly decides to join the runup of GG Zed, helps lynch him

D9
- claims pj with not much heat. Nothing else.
 
Hodor said:
D1
- votes GG Bucky, joins the game and jumps on a train
- unvotes, stays off any otis train

D2
- votes Zed, says he is still convinced he is bad, but I dont see any other posts saying he is bad? Weird imo
- sits as loan vote on GG Zed
- whoa whoa, red flag. He higlights three GG players at end of bucky lynch without knowing bucky alignment
- DOS on Dan Lambskin
- HE ENDS UP VOTING BUCKY AGAIN AND SAYS THE STALL ON HIM IS TELLING WTMF

D3
- posts a bg list consisting of GG Zed, GG Yuk, GG Manback, GG Hulk and BG Rascal
- says GG Hulk is bad, GG Zed is bad and GG sand is bad
- threatens to vote GG Manback
- votes GG Worm
- says GG Harry and GG Acer are bg teammates

D4
- Votes Acer
- votes BG Rascal
- unvotes BG Rascal and says we need to figure out who had grenade
- votes Acer, says tomorrow its GG Zed
- moves back to Rascal

D5
- votes BG Foos
- defends BG Loan saying BGs are trying to get him lynched without words
- bumps a post from icon saying it locks foos as a BG. STRANGE IMO. very weird to lock him as bg from that post.
- then votes BG Loan Shark wtf, as if he wanted to be on the lynch.

D6
- Says Foos should be killed with nade (Foos was protected fyi)
- votes BG Hags for claim
- quicky unvotes after his claim and stays off

D7
- votes GG Zed
- bumps Norms list "just so he can find it"
- votes hags
- unvotes?
- votes hags again
- calls out EG for his list post, then says Witz or myself should go next. (cause of Norm list)

D8
- Votes GG Me solely based on Norms list. ALARM ALARM ALARM
- Suddenly decides to join the runup of GG Zed, helps lynch him

D9
- claims pj with not much heat. Nothing else.
Click to expand...
This was MexJoe

 
I literally found ZERO gg points for Joe. Suprising imo. Can't believe he stayed off my radar completely. Textbook under the radar bg play.

It seems kinda obvious at this point. I am now leaning towards Mex Joe

 
I'm convinced that around d2 or d3 there was talk amongst the bg's to try throwing my name out there for votes. Icon led the charge and others got on me at various times, including Joe. What I find interesting about it is that I had declared PBJ already, and people believed it. GG's left me alone, but random attacks still came my way. It didn't make any logical sense if you're an experienced player and a gg to waste time on a noob PBJ. Especially when we were getting destroyed early in the game!

So you couple that with all the other gg names he was throwing out there and it's pretty obvious. He did vote for Rascal, but bg's I would imagine probably get forced to pile on their own when a lynching looks inevitable.

By having Witz listed where you do, I'm guessing you think his claim is bogus?

 
McGarnicle said:
I'm convinced that around d2 or d3 there was talk amongst the bg's to try throwing my name out there for votes. Icon led the charge and others got on me at various times, including Joe. What I find interesting about it is that I had declared PBJ already, and people believed it. GG's left me alone, but random attacks still came my way. It didn't make any logical sense if you're an experienced player and a gg to waste time on a noob PBJ. Especially when we were getting destroyed early in the game!

So you couple that with all the other gg names he was throwing out there and it's pretty obvious. He did vote for Rascal, but bg's I would imagine probably get forced to pile on their own when a lynching looks inevitable.

By having Witz listed where you do, I'm guessing you think his claim is bogus?
Click to expand...
He is shady no doubt, but lets see what happens with night kills, I am willing to see if he gets a wham. Now if he makes it to final three or whatever, whoever is there needs to take a long hard look imo.

 
:coffee:

Sorry wasn't around much yesterday and will be fairly busy today

Read through Hodors summary and it's good enough for me. We've gotta make s play eventually and there's not enough info to be 100%

Let's hope we're right

 
Dan Lambskin said:
:coffee:

Sorry wasn't around much yesterday and will be fairly busy today

Read through Hodors summary and it's good enough for me. We've gotta make s play eventually and there's not enough info to be 100%

Let's hope we're right
Click to expand...
never enough info to be 100%If there are three bgs left and Joe isn't one of them then we lose. More likely theres only one or two bgs left, and it's joe and/or witz imo. And because witz claimed angel it makes a lot more sense to keep him around. It's just good strategy.

If witz really is the angel and Joe isn't the last bg, then what do the bgs do tonight? if they try to kill witz, it makes it easier for us because we were already considering lynching him. If they don't, and they try to kill someone witz is protecting, then nobody will die at night, which is awesome for us because one less gg would be dead and we would know witz is telling the truth.

If witz is bad, then the bgs will have to give us information with their choice of kills. If you guys really still suspect me, you'll be happy if they kill me. each night they have no choice but to help solve a problem for us and narrow down our choices.

So we start with Joe, then debate eg or witz (or someone else) tomorrow. that's why the gamesometimes stalls like this when we ate closer to the end. People can go back and reread posts like brent and i just did, and brent's write ups are not only awesome, they match up exactly with what I saw, so I tend to believe him a little more, which helps me trust him a little more, which makes this whole thing easier. if you guys had plopped votes on me early, and witz and Joe had said that makes sense and finished me off, we would have been in a much worse spot.

 
My Fred rant was just beer and weed cookie induced paranoia. I always get emotional when the Masters is on. Still glad I put it out there to see if it would stick.

This game sure makes you reevaluate your assumptions about other people, and how your own behavior is perceived by others.

 
Seems odd that the one or two bg's left would basically disappear at this point in the game, assuming they gave a crap about the outcome. Unless they just see it as a lost cause anyway. I'd be spinning all kinds of horse#### theories to try to bamboozle the gg's.

 
No, he doesn't. And I am highly skeptical that there would be an angel and a protection item in the game. Absent 2 reveals, we can't count on a counter claim for a character we know is in the game. I'm leaning towards taking a chance and going back to witz.

 
CGRdrJoe said:
Didn't realize my play was so crappy, thanks Hodor, but I'm still just a pjb
Click to expand...
Joe, did you realize you already had 4 votes when you posted this? Not sure where Bob is but the suspense is killing me. I'll hang up and listen.Time to get drunk and watch golf. See you guys tomorrow (I hope).

 
Official D9 My Big Unit Dog Only Costs $6, But It's Pricier By The Inch Vote Count

7 alive; 4 lynch

Mex has 4 votes. That's a lynch! RPs - moves!

CGRdrJoe (4) - bostonfred, Hodor, Lambskin, McGarnicle

YTV (3) - CGRdrJoe, EG, witz

 
Lynch Report

CROWD: " A witch! A witch! A witch! A witch! We've found a witch! A witch! A witch! A witch! A witch! We've got a witch! A witch! A witch! Burn her! Burn her! Burn her! We've found a witch! We've found a witch! A witch! A witch! A witch! "

VILLAGER #1: ""We have found a witch. May we burn her? "

CROWD: "Burn her! Burn! Burn her! Burn her! "

BEDEVERE: "How do you know she is a witch? "

VILLAGER #2: "She looks like one. "

CROWD: "Right! Yeah! Yeah! "

BEDEVERE: "Bring her forward. "

Mex: "I'm not a witch. I'm not a witch. "

BEDEVERE: "Uh, but you are dressed as one. "

Mex: "They dressed me up like this. "

CROWD: "Augh, we didn't! We didn't... "

Mex: "And this isn't my nose. It's a false one. "

BEDEVERE: "Well? "

VILLAGER #1: "Well, we did do the nose. "

BEDEVERE: "The nose? "

VILLAGER #1: "And the hat, but she is a witch! "

VILLAGER #2: "Yeah! "

CROWD: "We burn her! Right! Yeaaah! Yeaah! "

BEDEVERE: "Did you dress her up like this? "

VILLAGER #1: "No! "

VILLAGER #2 and 3: "No. No. "

VILLAGER #2: "No. "

VILLAGER #1: "No. "

VILLAGERS #2 and #3: "No. "

VILLAGER #1: "Yes. "

VILLAGER #2: "Yes. "

VILLAGER #1: "Yes. Yeah, a bit. "

VILLAGER #3: "A bit. "

VILLAGERS #1 and #2: "A bit. "

VILLAGER #3: "A bit. "

VILLAGER #1: "She has got a wart. "

BEDEVERE: "What makes you think she is a witch? "

VILLAGER #3: "Well, she turned me into a newt. "

BEDEVERE: "A newt? "

VILLAGER #3: "I got better. "

VILLAGER #2: "Burn her anyway! "

VILLAGER #1: "Burn! "

CROWD: "Burn her! Burn! Burn her!... "

BEDEVERE: "Quiet! Quiet! Quiet! Quiet! There are ways of telling whether she is a witch. "

VILLAGER #1: "Are there? "

VILLAGER #2: "Ah? "

VILLAGER #1: "What are they? "

CROWD: "Tell us! Tell us!... "

BEDEVERE: "Tell me. What do you do with witches? "

VILLAGER #2: "Burn! "

VILLAGER #1: "Burn! "

CROWD: "Burn! Burn them up! Burn!... "

BEDEVERE: "And what do you burn apart from witches? "

VILLAGER #1: "More witches! "

VILLAGER #3: "Shh! "

VILLAGER #2: "Wood! "

BEDEVERE: "So, why do witches burn? "

[pause]

VILLAGER #3: "B--... 'cause they're made of... wood? "

BEDEVERE: "Good! Heh heh. "

CROWD: "Oh, yeah. Oh. "

BEDEVERE: "So, how do we tell whether she is made of wood? "

VILLAGER #1: "Build a bridge out of her. "

BEDEVERE: "Ah, but can you not also make bridges out of stone? "

VILLAGER #1: "Oh, yeah. "

RANDOM: "Oh, yeah. True. Uhh... "

BEDEVERE: "Does wood sink in water? "

VILLAGER #1: "No. No. "

VILLAGER #2: "No, it floats! It floats! "

VILLAGER #1: "Throw her into the pond! "

CROWD: "The pond! Throw her into the pond! "

BEDEVERE: "What also floats in water? "

"Bread! "

VILLAGER #2: "Apples! "

VILLAGER #3: "Uh, very small rocks! "

VILLAGER #1: "Cider! "

VILLAGER #2: "Uh, gra-- gravy! "

VILLAGER #1: "Cherries! "

VILLAGER #2: "Mud! "

VILLAGER #3: "Uh, churches! Churches! "

VILLAGER #2: "Lead! Lead! "

ARTHUR: "A duck! "

CROWD: "Oooh. "

BEDEVERE: "Exactly. So, logically... "

VILLAGER #1: "If... she... weighs... the same as a duck,... she's made of wood. "

BEDEVERE: "And therefore? "

VILLAGER #2: "A witch! "

VILLAGER #1: "A witch! "

CROWD: "A witch! A witch!... "

VILLAGER #4: "Here is a duck. Use this duck. "

[quack quack quack]

BEDEVERE: "Very good. We shall use my largest scales. "

CROWD: "Ohh! Ohh! Burn the witch! Burn the witch! Burn her! Burn her! Burn her! Burn her! Burn her! Burn her! Burn her! Ahh! Ahh... "

BEDEVERE: "Right. Remove the supports! "

[whop]
[clunk]
[creak]

CROWD: "A witch! A witch! A witch! "

Mex: "It's a fair cop. "

Lynched, but fairly so, is CGRdrJoe - Plain Jane Briton.

If you have a move, get it to me.

 
if I die tonight good luck Ggs

If two ggs die tonight, then we will be in a Kendall and there will be no room for error

eg and witz both stayed off the lynch don't know if that's significant

Might need to give one last look at hodor and Mcgarnicle. I'm not doing it before GoT.

if there is any indication of a wham tonight or after I die and nobody else claims to have protected someone that night then that confirms witz

If there are any other role players nows the time to come out imo

Gl all

 
Horrible - and I'm looking directly at Hodor and BF.

With Dan and McG playing for the first time, they don't know any better, but you both do.

It's the weekend - in all the years of doing this, things slow down considerably or stop but even if there are discussions, they certainly aren't votes , especially when you're down to 7 individuals. If any of you are bad, bravo - you're doing what you can to win. If not, not sure what you were thinking.

 
Witz said:
Horrible - and I'm looking directly at Hodor and BF.

With Dan and McG playing for the first time, they don't know any better, but you both do.

It's the weekend - in all the years of doing this, things slow down considerably or stop but even if there are discussions, they certainly aren't votes , especially when you're down to 7 individuals. If any of you are bad, bravo - you're doing what you can to win. If not, not sure what you were thinking.
Click to expand...
Horrible? Could be a gg win and you already calling it horrible? You seem to know what the reveal is gonna be...

 
Hodor said:
Witz said:
Horrible - and I'm looking directly at Hodor and BF.

With Dan and McG playing for the first time, they don't know any better, but you both do.

It's the weekend - in all the years of doing this, things slow down considerably or stop but even if there are discussions, they certainly aren't votes , especially when you're down to 7 individuals. If any of you are bad, bravo - you're doing what you can to win. If not, not sure what you were thinking.
Click to expand...
Horrible? Could be a gg win and you already calling it horrible? You seem to know what the reveal is gonna be...
Click to expand...
Aaaand I just realized Joe is good.

 
Hodor said:
Hodor said:
Witz said:
Horrible - and I'm looking directly at Hodor and BF.

With Dan and McG playing for the first time, they don't know any better, but you both do.

It's the weekend - in all the years of doing this, things slow down considerably or stop but even if there are discussions, they certainly aren't votes , especially when you're down to 7 individuals. If any of you are bad, bravo - you're doing what you can to win. If not, not sure what you were thinking.
Click to expand...
Horrible? Could be a gg win and you already calling it horrible? You seem to know what the reveal is gonna be...
Click to expand...
Aaaand I just realized Joe is good.
Click to expand...
Skimmah.

:P

 
Witz said:
Good discussion starting to happen.

I'll be back later tonight with my thoughts.
Click to expand...
this was witz's last post before reappearing two days later, after the lynch, and complaining about our play. Would a really engaged gg totally forget to check back "later tonight" or in the next 48 hours? Would a disengaged gg lead out with criticism like that instead of a mea culpa for disappearing if he'd just totally flaked like that?
 
bostonfred said:
Witz said:
Good discussion starting to happen.

I'll be back later tonight with my thoughts.
Click to expand...
this was witz's last post before reappearing two days later, after the lynch, and complaining about our play. Would a really engaged gg totally forget to check back "later tonight" or in the next 48 hours? Would a disengaged gg lead out with criticism like that instead of a mea culpa for disappearing if he'd just totally flaked like that?
Click to expand...
:lmao:

You're trying too hard BF.

 
Witz said:
Witz said:
When you changed the vote to pvote hags at 2:14, hags had posted right at that time - the vc came up and you quickly went back to zed and than hags hammered it.

Why the vote for zed to put him at 4, followed by the vote of hags followed by the quick vote back to zed?
Click to expand...
It's almost as if you realized Bob had posted the wrong vote count and you didn't want hags to hammer what wasn't a final vote.
Click to expand...
this didn't even make sense to me when he first said it. on the one hand, he processed that information really quickly. On the other hand, he totally skimmed that my vote went to hags and Bob didn't count it. If he was skimming would he have been able to figure out my supposedly nefarious plot so quickly? If he wasnt, then how did he miss that my hags vote didn't actually count?
 
Bob Sacamano said:
Official D8 Shticky Vote Count

9 live; 5 kill

Zed has 5 votes. That's a lynch! RPs - moves.

Zed (5) - CGRdrJoe, witz, Merlin, bostonfred, Black Knight

witz (1) - EG

YTV (4) - Lambskin, Zed, McGarnicle, Hodor
Click to expand...
bostonfred said:
Witz said:
hagmania said:
vote zed
Click to expand...
If this is real, not good for BF.
Click to expand...
Hags is dead dummy
Click to expand...
hagmania said:
*the dead shall now ####*
Click to expand...
Witz said:
bostonfred said:
Witz said:
hagmania said:
vote zed
Click to expand...
If this is real, not good for BF.
Click to expand...
Hags is dead dummy
Click to expand...
You were saying?
Click to expand...
If you're going to try to throw stones BF, at least tell the full story.


 
Witz said:
Hodor said:
Dan Lambskin said:
So icon was voting for his fellow BG huh

How many others on him?
Click to expand...
Who, rascal?
Click to expand...
Icon was just voting for Loan. Loan's a BG Dan?
Click to expand...
then again this is interesting, Dan may have hc'ed
Dan Lambskin said:
Witz said:
Hodor said:
Dan Lambskin said:
So icon was voting for his fellow BG huh

How many others on him?
Click to expand...
Who, rascal?
Click to expand...
Icon was just voting for Loan. Loan's a BG Dan?
Click to expand...
Isn't that the assumption most of us are under?

Guess I should have said alleged
Click to expand...
 
Witz said:
Hodor said:
Dan Lambskin said:
So icon was voting for his fellow BG huh

How many others on him?
Click to expand...
Who, rascal?
Click to expand...
Icon was just voting for Loan. Loan's a BG Dan?
Click to expand...
then again this is interesting, Dan may have hc'ed
Dan Lambskin said:
Witz said:
Hodor said:
Dan Lambskin said:
So icon was voting for his fellow BG huh

How many others on him?
Click to expand...
Who, rascal?
Click to expand...
Icon was just voting for Loan. Loan's a BG Dan?
Click to expand...
Isn't that the assumption most of us are under?

Guess I should have said alleged
Click to expand...
Dan Lambskin said:
Hodor said:
Dan Lambskin said:
So icon was voting for his fellow BG huh

How many others on him?
Click to expand...
Who, rascal?
Click to expand...
Wasn't he on Loan? I'm under the assumption Loan is bad at least...we need him to claim soon though
Click to expand...
intriguing
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

[icon]
ACTIVE SHOOTER WW > D4 > PAV LIVES!
36 37 38
Replies
2K
Views
41K
(HULK)
(HULK)
[icon]
SuperTroopers WW Game
39 40 41
Replies
2K
Views
43K
mquinnjr
mquinnjr

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top