What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official Juicer thread*** (1 Viewer)

Doctor Detroit

Please remove your headgear
Please add an player you can think of that you're pretty sure was juicing. Since we have people here that will never let the Bonds issue go, since we have media idiots who want to forgive Jason Giambi because he said "sorry," and since we have watched players over the past two decades line their pockets after lining their veins there should be a thread. Should we make separate record books for these players? For the entire era? Should we forgive Jason Giambi like we would forgive someone who cheated on a college entry exam or a card game? do you forgive someone who cheated on a card game if they say sorry? I certainly don't.

Here is just my initial list, please add yours as the names come to you.

Juan Gonzalez

Jeff Bagwell

Roger Clemens

Brady Anderson

Lance Parrish

Jose Rijo

Jim Thome

David Ortiz (on accident)

Ivan Rodriguez

Mike Piazza

The 1990 Oakland A's

Troy Glauss

Larry Walker

Albert Belle

Jay Buhner

Danny Tartabull

Miguel Tejada

Darren Daulton

Benito Santiago

Eric Karros

Mike Timlin

Eric Gagne

Norm Charlton

Brad Penny

Mickey Tettleton

Elis Burks

Roberto Alomar

Pete Rose (Oh, he only sold them)

Carlos Baerga

Mo Vaughn

Luis Gonzalez :kicksrock:

Those are just some off the top of my head and I really haven't touched the pitchers. Tim Raines used to run around with cocaine in his uniform pocket, a lot of players used amphetamines and that went on way before the steroid era. Point is the pool is deep here and this is just the surface. If they really want to dig deep there are going to be a lot of names on the hit list. As a baseball fan do you want to see all the names? Do you want to openly pardon one user and not others? Was the playing field really that uneven? How many guys from the 80s are openly complaining about steroid use in the 90s? How many of them extended their careers with some juice? I seriously don't want to know. I really don't.

 
For Cobalt 27:

1996 New York Yankees:

John Wettland

Paul O'Neil (roid rage)

Reuben Sierra

Jim Leyritz

Gerald Williams (freakishly fast in Sega based baseball games which makes me suspicious)

Amphetamines or anything they could get their hands on:

Dwight Gooden

Steve Howe

Darryl Strawberry

Tim Raines

That was more like a pharmacy staff than a baseball team. So if we should count Barry Bonds records we probably shouldn't count this world championship either right? :shrug:

ETA: Wow, guess who was on the 1999 and 2000 New York Yankee championship team? None other than the ringmaster himself

I'm calling for a full investigation from a neutral party. Lets dig a little deeper shall we?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
For Cobalt 27:

1996 New York Yankees:

John Wettland

Paul O'Neil (roid rage)

Reuben Sierra

Jim Leyritz

Gerald Williams (freakishly fast in Sega based baseball games which makes me suspicious)

Amphetamines or anything they could get their hands on:

Dwight Gooden

Steve Howe

Darryl Strawberry

Tim Raines

That was more like a pharmacy staff than a baseball team. So if we should count Barry Bonds records we probably shouldn't count this world championship either right? :)

ETA: Wow, guess who was on the 1999 and 2000 New York Yankee championship team? None other than the ringmaster himself

I'm calling for a full investigation from a neutral party. Lets dig a little deeper shall we?
:kicksrock: BTW, who's advocated for not counting Bonds's records? I know I haven't. Most people who don't think they're legitimate are not, therefore, saying that the record books need to be tinkered with.

 
For Cobalt 27:

1996 New York Yankees:

John Wettland

Paul O'Neil (roid rage)

Reuben Sierra

Jim Leyritz

Gerald Williams (freakishly fast in Sega based baseball games which makes me suspicious)

Amphetamines or anything they could get their hands on:

Dwight Gooden

Steve Howe

Darryl Strawberry

Tim Raines

That was more like a pharmacy staff than a baseball team. So if we should count Barry Bonds records we probably shouldn't count this world championship either right? :shrug:

ETA: Wow, guess who was on the 1999 and 2000 New York Yankee championship team? None other than the ringmaster himself

I'm calling for a full investigation from a neutral party. Lets dig a little deeper shall we?
:bye: BTW, who's advocated for not counting Bonds's records? I know I haven't. Most people who don't think they're legitimate are not, therefore, saying that the record books need to be tinkered with.
Oh I must have misunderstood this:
Agreed.

Still doesn't mean we have to look upon Barry's records and pretend that they are legit.
Here's what I'm saying to all the Bonds bashers who single him out: If you want to dig into your teams records and find some flaws you won't have to look very hard. In the NCAA they will take away a teams wins for the entire year if a player, just one is caught cheating (gambling, kickbacks, etc.). Now I'm not advocating that, what I'm saying is that fans have to live with the Steroid era as a whole not piecemeal as with Bonds, McGuire, or whomever. You start throwing asterisks next to players, you better start throwing asterisks next to teams. Then the whole era is one big asterisk and we have no idea when the cheating really began. Just like in other eras where players and owners cut corners, the Steroid Era is now part of the game and the records achieved in this era go into the record books like any other record. The asterisk is for the fans when they tell their grandkids they saw Mark McGuire's 70 HR season or Bonds' 71st HR but still feel the all-time champ is Roger Maris or Babe Ruth (depending on games played).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
For Cobalt 27:

1996 New York Yankees:

John Wettland

Paul O'Neil (roid rage)

Reuben Sierra

Jim Leyritz

Gerald Williams (freakishly fast in Sega based baseball games which makes me suspicious)

Amphetamines or anything they could get their hands on:

Dwight Gooden

Steve Howe

Darryl Strawberry

Tim Raines

That was more like a pharmacy staff than a baseball team. So if we should count Barry Bonds records we probably shouldn't count this world championship either right? :confused:

ETA: Wow, guess who was on the 1999 and 2000 New York Yankee championship team? None other than the ringmaster himself

I'm calling for a full investigation from a neutral party. Lets dig a little deeper shall we?
:thumbup: BTW, who's advocated for not counting Bonds's records? I know I haven't. Most people who don't think they're legitimate are not, therefore, saying that the record books need to be tinkered with.
Oh I must have misunderstood this:
Agreed.

Still doesn't mean we have to look upon Barry's records and pretend that they are legit.
Here's what I'm saying to all the Bonds bashers who single him out: If you want to dig into your teams records and find some flaws you won't have to look very hard. In the NCAA they will take away a teams wins for the entire year if a player, just one is caught cheating (gambling, kickbacks, etc.). Now I'm not advocating that, what I'm saying is that fans have to live with the Steroid era as a whole not piecemeal as with Bonds, McGuire, or whomever. You start throwing asterisks next to players, you better start throwing asterisks next to teams. Then the whole era is one big asterisk and we have no idea when the cheating really began. Just like in other eras where players and owners cut corners, the Steroid Era is now part of the game and the records achieved in this era go into the record books like any other record. The asterisk is for the fans when they tell their grandkids they saw Mark McGuire's 70 HR season or Bonds' 71st HR but still feel the all-time champ is Roger Maris or Babe Ruth (depending on games played).
No one here is advocating an asterisk. In fact, I can't remember one person in ANY of these discussions saying one of those should be appended next to Bonds's name. I'm not sure what you think you misunderstood in my statement above. All I've maintained throughout this is that, while the numbers are what they are, and Bonds's name will reflect a few HR records for some time now, no one has to accept them as legitimate. Big difference between a printed asterisk and a mental one.Fans do have to live with the steroid era as a whole. I agree with you. But, where I disagree is that individual contributors can be singled out, as well. Our human brains fail at a lot of things, but one thing it can do in simple situations like this is multi-task. We can admonish the game and the administration(s) that allowed this problem to fester, and at the same time look upon certain records that are clearly the casualty, not out of superior skill alone, but born out of a pharmacy that boosted that skill. The numbers are merely a reflection of this interaction, and one can very easily tease apart the regard for Maris and Hank away from the chafe of respect for Giambi (MVP), McGwire, Sosa, and Bonds, knowing that they incorporated juice/HGH to bolster their accomplishments.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
:cry: He really seemed to beef up in mid 90s and I think there's a pretty noticable power surge in his stats starting around '93 or '94. (Averaging around 7 HRs a year up to about 20)Plus Caminiti and Bagwell were there so you know there was juice readily available.
Biggio's numbers went up once he got out of the Astrodome National Park. Only men amongst men could hit HRs in that joint whereas any of us can reach the Crawford Boxes. Having watched Biggio his entire career as an Astros fan, his swing since going to MMP looks completely different from his swing in the Astrodome.
 
For Cobalt 27:

1996 New York Yankees:

John Wettland

Paul O'Neil (roid rage)

Reuben Sierra

Jim Leyritz

Gerald Williams (freakishly fast in Sega based baseball games which makes me suspicious)

Amphetamines or anything they could get their hands on:

Dwight Gooden

Steve Howe

Darryl Strawberry

Tim Raines

That was more like a pharmacy staff than a baseball team. So if we should count Barry Bonds records we probably shouldn't count this world championship either right? :cry:

ETA: Wow, guess who was on the 1999 and 2000 New York Yankee championship team? None other than the ringmaster himself

I'm calling for a full investigation from a neutral party. Lets dig a little deeper shall we?
:boxing: BTW, who's advocated for not counting Bonds's records? I know I haven't. Most people who don't think they're legitimate are not, therefore, saying that the record books need to be tinkered with.
Oh I must have misunderstood this:
Agreed.

Still doesn't mean we have to look upon Barry's records and pretend that they are legit.
Here's what I'm saying to all the Bonds bashers who single him out: If you want to dig into your teams records and find some flaws you won't have to look very hard. In the NCAA they will take away a teams wins for the entire year if a player, just one is caught cheating (gambling, kickbacks, etc.). Now I'm not advocating that, what I'm saying is that fans have to live with the Steroid era as a whole not piecemeal as with Bonds, McGuire, or whomever. You start throwing asterisks next to players, you better start throwing asterisks next to teams. Then the whole era is one big asterisk and we have no idea when the cheating really began. Just like in other eras where players and owners cut corners, the Steroid Era is now part of the game and the records achieved in this era go into the record books like any other record. The asterisk is for the fans when they tell their grandkids they saw Mark McGuire's 70 HR season or Bonds' 71st HR but still feel the all-time champ is Roger Maris or Babe Ruth (depending on games played).
No one here is advocating an asterisk. In fact, I can't remember one person in ANY of these discussions saying one of those should be appended next to Bonds's name. I'm not sure what you think you misunderstood in my statement above. All I've maintained throughout this is that, while the numbers are what they are, and Bonds's name will reflect a few HR records for some time now, no one has to accept them as legitimate. Big difference between a printed asterisk and a mental one.
What you are saying is that Bonds numbers are not "legit." In that case none of the numbers from this era are legit because of the widespread abuse. If you are saying Bonds numbers are not legit then you better look at the big picture and as I said, look at your team. I think you have to consider Bonds numbers legit and if you chose not to, you should probably step back and reconsider wearing your 1996 World Championship t-shirt. If Bonds HR records or OPS+ numbers aren’t “legit,” a whole bunch of statistics and records to include team victories aren’t either. I don’t think you can have it both way and when I say “you” I mean all the people who continually single out Barry Bonds. Fact is Bonds is the best player in his generation and he was before he allegedly touched steroids. That is my point in every Bonds thread on this board while most of the other people just say they hate him without looking any further. If people want to disregard his accomplishments or say it is ill-gotten booty then I can live with their opinion. But I also don’t want to call that person on a guy from their team who was juicing and hear a sob story about circustances or flat out denial. I think that is extremely hypocritical.

 
Nomar Garciaparra- Pretty much 100% sure on this one, it's really not arguable.
:cry: Proud of it, tooI just assume most of them were, and good for Barry, he rang up a bunch of juicing pitchers
Who clearly benefit from steroids in the skill of pitching every bit as much as hitters benefit from them by hitting the ball farther.
Why would you say that... We know It's not the skill - It's the recovery time and ability to continue to work out without needing the normal time to rest and allow you body to naturally build and recover...... It's a LONG season... This stuff helps you stay at your peak the longest and I don't even think it always means a ton of body size.

YEAH.. I think pitchers get a HUGE amount of help on this stuff - Not Roger though :boxing:

 
:goodposting: He really seemed to beef up in mid 90s and I think there's a pretty noticable power surge in his stats starting around '93 or '94. (Averaging around 7 HRs a year up to about 20)Plus Caminiti and Bagwell were there so you know there was juice readily available.
Biggio's numbers went up once he got out of the Astrodome National Park. Only men amongst men could hit HRs in that joint whereas any of us can reach the Crawford Boxes. Having watched Biggio his entire career as an Astros fan, his swing since going to MMP looks completely different from his swing in the Astrodome.
Biggio's numbers went up in 1994. MMP wasn't opened up until 2000. But hey, you're the fan
 
:lmao: He really seemed to beef up in mid 90s and I think there's a pretty noticable power surge in his stats starting around '93 or '94. (Averaging around 7 HRs a year up to about 20)Plus Caminiti and Bagwell were there so you know there was juice readily available.
Biggio's numbers went up once he got out of the Astrodome National Park. Only men amongst men could hit HRs in that joint whereas any of us can reach the Crawford Boxes. Having watched Biggio his entire career as an Astros fan, his swing since going to MMP looks completely different from his swing in the Astrodome.
Biggio's numbers went up in 1994. MMP wasn't opened up until 2000. But hey, you're the fan
and a fan with a terrible memory... :popcorn: Anyhow, 94 would have been right around the time the Astros made all of those stupid adjustments to the Astrodome when they moved in the fences, planted flowers just above the wall, etc. I spent every spring in Kissimmee during Biggio/Bagwell years. There, you can pretty much walk up next to the players - I've even sat curbside with Bagwell in his rookie year and chatted with him while he waited for his then girlfriend (former playmate) to pick him up. I never saw anything noticeable with Biggio as far as the puffy face, popeye foremarms, etc. Bagwell - different story.
 
Heck, I'd like to see the list of people who didn't use.

THAT is the problem - Personally, I think the way MLB had it all set up, more took than didn't. Why wouldn't you when the rest of the clubhouse is and there's no penalty?

And again, it's not just to get BIG and hit homeruns, it's to help endure a long ### season and stay at your peak game... Not all these drugs are designed just for size and that's where alot of people go wrong in making accusations.....

 
Personally, I think the way MLB had it all set up, more took than didn't. Why wouldn't you when the rest of the clubhouse is and there's no penalty?
You are exactly right here. Millions of dollars are also at stake on top of the fact that professional athletes are super competative by nature. They are not going to let their peers get an edge on them when there is no penalty, they are going to do whatever it takes to keep up the pace.Anybody that believes otherwise has their head firmly buried in the sand.
 
For Cobalt 27:

1996 New York Yankees:

John Wettland

Paul O'Neil (roid rage)

Reuben Sierra

Jim Leyritz

Gerald Williams (freakishly fast in Sega based baseball games which makes me suspicious)

Amphetamines or anything they could get their hands on:

Dwight Gooden

Steve Howe

Darryl Strawberry

Tim Raines

That was more like a pharmacy staff than a baseball team. So if we should count Barry Bonds records we probably shouldn't count this world championship either right? :)

ETA: Wow, guess who was on the 1999 and 2000 New York Yankee championship team? None other than the ringmaster himself

I'm calling for a full investigation from a neutral party. Lets dig a little deeper shall we?
:X BTW, who's advocated for not counting Bonds's records? I know I haven't. Most people who don't think they're legitimate are not, therefore, saying that the record books need to be tinkered with.
Oh I must have misunderstood this:
Agreed.

Still doesn't mean we have to look upon Barry's records and pretend that they are legit.
Here's what I'm saying to all the Bonds bashers who single him out: If you want to dig into your teams records and find some flaws you won't have to look very hard. In the NCAA they will take away a teams wins for the entire year if a player, just one is caught cheating (gambling, kickbacks, etc.). Now I'm not advocating that, what I'm saying is that fans have to live with the Steroid era as a whole not piecemeal as with Bonds, McGuire, or whomever. You start throwing asterisks next to players, you better start throwing asterisks next to teams. Then the whole era is one big asterisk and we have no idea when the cheating really began. Just like in other eras where players and owners cut corners, the Steroid Era is now part of the game and the records achieved in this era go into the record books like any other record. The asterisk is for the fans when they tell their grandkids they saw Mark McGuire's 70 HR season or Bonds' 71st HR but still feel the all-time champ is Roger Maris or Babe Ruth (depending on games played).
No one here is advocating an asterisk. In fact, I can't remember one person in ANY of these discussions saying one of those should be appended next to Bonds's name. I'm not sure what you think you misunderstood in my statement above. All I've maintained throughout this is that, while the numbers are what they are, and Bonds's name will reflect a few HR records for some time now, no one has to accept them as legitimate. Big difference between a printed asterisk and a mental one.
What you are saying is that Bonds numbers are not "legit." In that case none of the numbers from this era are legit because of the widespread abuse. If you are saying Bonds numbers are not legit then you better look at the big picture and as I said, look at your team. I think you have to consider Bonds numbers legit and if you chose not to, you should probably step back and reconsider wearing your 1996 World Championship t-shirt. If Bonds HR records or OPS+ numbers aren’t “legit,” a whole bunch of statistics and records to include team victories aren’t either. I don’t think you can have it both way and when I say “you” I mean all the people who continually single out Barry Bonds. Fact is Bonds is the best player in his generation and he was before he allegedly touched steroids. That is my point in every Bonds thread on this board while most of the other people just say they hate him without looking any further. If people want to disregard his accomplishments or say it is ill-gotten booty then I can live with their opinion. But I also don’t want to call that person on a guy from their team who was juicing and hear a sob story about circustances or flat out denial. I think that is extremely hypocritical.
Perhaps.If you can accumulate the mountain of evidence against the NY96 team (or any other) comes even remotely close to that which clearly indicts Bonds, then I'll consider ripping up that '96 shirt. But, to my knowledge, there is no such evidence. I have made public (here and with friends, both Yanks fans and otherwise) my disdain for Jason Giambi. Before he moved to Detroit, I was always a big "hater" on Sheffield, as well, much in part due to his association with steroids. So, it's not like I'm a homer on this issue and defending anybody simply because they come from team I root for. I think steroids is/was a big problem and has convoluted the record books and MVPs and many of the individual measures by which so many of us take joy in making cross-era comparisons. So, I am totally unapologetic for throwing disdain around to those so associated. Bonds is, on the one hand, just one of those guys. On the other hand, though, he's treading on hallowed ground and combined his natural skills with pharmacology to be in that position. No doubt, he was a HOF player pre-juice. But, he was never the sort of offensive impact like this before doping up. And, it's that fact I cannot ignore when measuring his accolades on a historical (and current) measuring stick.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nomar Garciaparra- Pretty much 100% sure on this one, it's really not arguable.
:confused: Proud of it, tooI just assume most of them were, and good for Barry, he rang up a bunch of juicing pitchers
Who clearly benefit from steroids in the skill of pitching every bit as much as hitters benefit from them by hitting the ball farther.
Why would you say that... We know It's not the skill - It's the recovery time and ability to continue to work out without needing the normal time to rest and allow you body to naturally build and recover...... It's a LONG season... This stuff helps you stay at your peak the longest and I don't even think it always means a ton of body size.

YEAH.. I think pitchers get a HUGE amount of help on this stuff - Not Roger though :thumbup:
Umm...steroids helps build mass. Mass supports power. Power supports ball going far. The extent to which steroids might help foster recovery time is but a small benefit from the overwhelming acute effects it gives to body composition that relates strongly with skills related to swing velocity and leverage. FWIW, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised to learn that Roger used that stuff. And, if he did, I think all those Cy Youngs are fair game for cynicism, every bit as much as Bonds's HRs.

 
For Cobalt 27:

1996 New York Yankees:

John Wettland

Paul O'Neil (roid rage)

Reuben Sierra

Jim Leyritz

Gerald Williams (freakishly fast in Sega based baseball games which makes me suspicious)

Amphetamines or anything they could get their hands on:

Dwight Gooden

Steve Howe

Darryl Strawberry

Tim Raines

That was more like a pharmacy staff than a baseball team. So if we should count Barry Bonds records we probably shouldn't count this world championship either right? :goodposting:

ETA: Wow, guess who was on the 1999 and 2000 New York Yankee championship team? None other than the ringmaster himself

I'm calling for a full investigation from a neutral party. Lets dig a little deeper shall we?
:blackdot: BTW, who's advocated for not counting Bonds's records? I know I haven't. Most people who don't think they're legitimate are not, therefore, saying that the record books need to be tinkered with.
Oh I must have misunderstood this:
Agreed.

Still doesn't mean we have to look upon Barry's records and pretend that they are legit.
Here's what I'm saying to all the Bonds bashers who single him out: If you want to dig into your teams records and find some flaws you won't have to look very hard. In the NCAA they will take away a teams wins for the entire year if a player, just one is caught cheating (gambling, kickbacks, etc.). Now I'm not advocating that, what I'm saying is that fans have to live with the Steroid era as a whole not piecemeal as with Bonds, McGuire, or whomever. You start throwing asterisks next to players, you better start throwing asterisks next to teams. Then the whole era is one big asterisk and we have no idea when the cheating really began. Just like in other eras where players and owners cut corners, the Steroid Era is now part of the game and the records achieved in this era go into the record books like any other record. The asterisk is for the fans when they tell their grandkids they saw Mark McGuire's 70 HR season or Bonds' 71st HR but still feel the all-time champ is Roger Maris or Babe Ruth (depending on games played).
No one here is advocating an asterisk. In fact, I can't remember one person in ANY of these discussions saying one of those should be appended next to Bonds's name. I'm not sure what you think you misunderstood in my statement above. All I've maintained throughout this is that, while the numbers are what they are, and Bonds's name will reflect a few HR records for some time now, no one has to accept them as legitimate. Big difference between a printed asterisk and a mental one.
What you are saying is that Bonds numbers are not "legit." In that case none of the numbers from this era are legit because of the widespread abuse. If you are saying Bonds numbers are not legit then you better look at the big picture and as I said, look at your team. I think you have to consider Bonds numbers legit and if you chose not to, you should probably step back and reconsider wearing your 1996 World Championship t-shirt. If Bonds HR records or OPS+ numbers aren’t “legit,” a whole bunch of statistics and records to include team victories aren’t either. I don’t think you can have it both way and when I say “you” I mean all the people who continually single out Barry Bonds. Fact is Bonds is the best player in his generation and he was before he allegedly touched steroids. That is my point in every Bonds thread on this board while most of the other people just say they hate him without looking any further. If people want to disregard his accomplishments or say it is ill-gotten booty then I can live with their opinion. But I also don’t want to call that person on a guy from their team who was juicing and hear a sob story about circustances or flat out denial. I think that is extremely hypocritical.
Perhaps.If you can accumulate the mountain of evidence against the NY96 team (or any other) comes even remotely close to that which clearly indicts Bonds, then I'll consider ripping up that '96 shirt. But, to my knowledge, there is no such evidence. I have made public (here and with friends, both Yanks fans and otherwise) my disdain for Jason Giambi. Before he moved to Detroit, I was always a big "hater" on Sheffield, as well, much in part due to his association with steroids. So, it's not like I'm a homer on this issue and defending anybody simply because they come from team I root for. I think steroids is/was a big problem and has convoluted the record books and MVPs and many of the individual measures by which so many of us take joy in making cross-era comparisons. So, I am totally unapologetic for throwing disdain around to those so associated. Bonds is, on the one hand, just one of those guys. On the other hand, though, he's treading on hallowed ground and combined his natural skills with pharmacology to be in that position. No doubt, he was a HOF player pre-juice. But, he was never the sort of offensive impact like this before doping up. And, it's that fact I cannot ignore when measuring his accolades on a historical (and current) measuring stick.
Is Steve Howe still alive? What about Dwight Gooden? Still in jail? Strawberry? There is a ton of evidence that these players were often under the influence of cocaine and amphetamines. Add in Jason Grimsely later and you can bet any Yankee that wanted the juice got it. You are a homer with this issue and it's easy for you to say you hated Sheffield and blah, blah, blah now that he's gone. Easy for you to say you don't care for Giambi since he's on the way out. You are unapologetic to those who used performance enhancers (to include amphetamines) unless it involves your team and you proved it by denying the 1996 Yankees had any issues. They had more drug connections and known drug offenses from that team than a halfway house in Baltimore.
*On February 13, 1995, Strawberry was suspended for 75 days by Major League Baseball after testing positive for cocaine. He was released by the San Francisco Giants on the same day.

*On December 19, 1995, Strawberry was charged in California with failing to make child support payments. *When he missed a June 5, 1996 deadline to pay the child support, a Los Angeles judge set a trial date of July 17, at which time Strawberry agreed to use his Yankees signing bonus to pay the debt. [2]

*On August 25, 1998, Strawberry was sued by attorney Rob Shapiro for unpaid legal fees related to baseball contract negotiations in 1994. The two resolved the dispute on March 17, 1999.

*On April 3, 1999, Strawberry was arrested in Tampa, Florida for soliciting sex from a police woman posing as a prostitute and for having a small amount of cocaine. On April 24, he was suspended for 140 days by *Major League Baseball for the incident. On May 29, he pleaded no contest to the charges and was sentenced to 21 months probation and community service. [4]

*On January 2, 2000, Strawberry tested positive for cocaine. On March 15, shortly after the test result was announced, Major League Baseball announced that he would be suspended for one year. Six days later, he was in rehab.
Grimsley confessed to the use of human growth hormones, amphetamines and steroids in 2003.[7]

His drug use began in 1998 while in Buffalo, New York. After a nine year MLB career, he was in the minors trying to get back to the majors after a shoulder injury. Among the drugs he has used are Deca-Durabolin, amphetamines, human growth hormone and Clenbuterol. Prior to the use of performance enhancing drugs he had earned a total of $1 million; subsequently he has earned $9 million. His ERA dropped by a run
On Bonds you are incorrect that he didn't have the same sort of offensive impact before he "allegedly" started juicing. He was the best offensive player in baseball winning three MVPs, nine of ten seasons with 30 or more homers, ten of his first 11 seasons with more than 29 steals, back to back seasons in 93 and 94 of 200 OPS +, and six seasons with more than 290 total bases. So you're wrong. Even though he has better pure hitting years since 2000 he still strung together the best stats of any player in the 1990s considering his gold gloves, his steals, and his run production. He was the best player before 2000, and the best player after.
 
For Cobalt 27:

1996 New York Yankees:

John Wettland

Paul O'Neil (roid rage)

Reuben Sierra

Jim Leyritz

Gerald Williams (freakishly fast in Sega based baseball games which makes me suspicious)

Amphetamines or anything they could get their hands on:

Dwight Gooden

Steve Howe

Darryl Strawberry

Tim Raines

That was more like a pharmacy staff than a baseball team. So if we should count Barry Bonds records we probably shouldn't count this world championship either right? :banned:

ETA: Wow, guess who was on the 1999 and 2000 New York Yankee championship team? None other than the ringmaster himself

I'm calling for a full investigation from a neutral party. Lets dig a little deeper shall we?
:hey: BTW, who's advocated for not counting Bonds's records? I know I haven't. Most people who don't think they're legitimate are not, therefore, saying that the record books need to be tinkered with.
Oh I must have misunderstood this:
Agreed.

Still doesn't mean we have to look upon Barry's records and pretend that they are legit.
Here's what I'm saying to all the Bonds bashers who single him out: If you want to dig into your teams records and find some flaws you won't have to look very hard. In the NCAA they will take away a teams wins for the entire year if a player, just one is caught cheating (gambling, kickbacks, etc.). Now I'm not advocating that, what I'm saying is that fans have to live with the Steroid era as a whole not piecemeal as with Bonds, McGuire, or whomever. You start throwing asterisks next to players, you better start throwing asterisks next to teams. Then the whole era is one big asterisk and we have no idea when the cheating really began. Just like in other eras where players and owners cut corners, the Steroid Era is now part of the game and the records achieved in this era go into the record books like any other record. The asterisk is for the fans when they tell their grandkids they saw Mark McGuire's 70 HR season or Bonds' 71st HR but still feel the all-time champ is Roger Maris or Babe Ruth (depending on games played).
No one here is advocating an asterisk. In fact, I can't remember one person in ANY of these discussions saying one of those should be appended next to Bonds's name. I'm not sure what you think you misunderstood in my statement above. All I've maintained throughout this is that, while the numbers are what they are, and Bonds's name will reflect a few HR records for some time now, no one has to accept them as legitimate. Big difference between a printed asterisk and a mental one.
What you are saying is that Bonds numbers are not "legit." In that case none of the numbers from this era are legit because of the widespread abuse. If you are saying Bonds numbers are not legit then you better look at the big picture and as I said, look at your team. I think you have to consider Bonds numbers legit and if you chose not to, you should probably step back and reconsider wearing your 1996 World Championship t-shirt. If Bonds HR records or OPS+ numbers aren’t “legit,” a whole bunch of statistics and records to include team victories aren’t either. I don’t think you can have it both way and when I say “you” I mean all the people who continually single out Barry Bonds. Fact is Bonds is the best player in his generation and he was before he allegedly touched steroids. That is my point in every Bonds thread on this board while most of the other people just say they hate him without looking any further. If people want to disregard his accomplishments or say it is ill-gotten booty then I can live with their opinion. But I also don’t want to call that person on a guy from their team who was juicing and hear a sob story about circustances or flat out denial. I think that is extremely hypocritical.
Perhaps.If you can accumulate the mountain of evidence against the NY96 team (or any other) comes even remotely close to that which clearly indicts Bonds, then I'll consider ripping up that '96 shirt. But, to my knowledge, there is no such evidence. I have made public (here and with friends, both Yanks fans and otherwise) my disdain for Jason Giambi. Before he moved to Detroit, I was always a big "hater" on Sheffield, as well, much in part due to his association with steroids. So, it's not like I'm a homer on this issue and defending anybody simply because they come from team I root for. I think steroids is/was a big problem and has convoluted the record books and MVPs and many of the individual measures by which so many of us take joy in making cross-era comparisons. So, I am totally unapologetic for throwing disdain around to those so associated. Bonds is, on the one hand, just one of those guys. On the other hand, though, he's treading on hallowed ground and combined his natural skills with pharmacology to be in that position. No doubt, he was a HOF player pre-juice. But, he was never the sort of offensive impact like this before doping up. And, it's that fact I cannot ignore when measuring his accolades on a historical (and current) measuring stick.
Is Steve Howe still alive? What about Dwight Gooden? Still in jail? Strawberry? There is a ton of evidence that these players were often under the influence of cocaine and amphetamines. Add in Jason Grimsely later and you can bet any Yankee that wanted the juice got it. You are a homer with this issue and it's easy for you to say you hated Sheffield and blah, blah, blah now that he's gone. Easy for you to say you don't care for Giambi since he's on the way out. You are unapologetic to those who used performance enhancers (to include amphetamines) unless it involves your team and you proved it by denying the 1996 Yankees had any issues. They had more drug connections and known drug offenses from that team than a halfway house in Baltimore.
*On February 13, 1995, Strawberry was suspended for 75 days by Major League Baseball after testing positive for cocaine. He was released by the San Francisco Giants on the same day.

*On December 19, 1995, Strawberry was charged in California with failing to make child support payments. *When he missed a June 5, 1996 deadline to pay the child support, a Los Angeles judge set a trial date of July 17, at which time Strawberry agreed to use his Yankees signing bonus to pay the debt. [2]

*On August 25, 1998, Strawberry was sued by attorney Rob Shapiro for unpaid legal fees related to baseball contract negotiations in 1994. The two resolved the dispute on March 17, 1999.

*On April 3, 1999, Strawberry was arrested in Tampa, Florida for soliciting sex from a police woman posing as a prostitute and for having a small amount of cocaine. On April 24, he was suspended for 140 days by *Major League Baseball for the incident. On May 29, he pleaded no contest to the charges and was sentenced to 21 months probation and community service. [4]

*On January 2, 2000, Strawberry tested positive for cocaine. On March 15, shortly after the test result was announced, Major League Baseball announced that he would be suspended for one year. Six days later, he was in rehab.
Grimsley confessed to the use of human growth hormones, amphetamines and steroids in 2003.[7]

His drug use began in 1998 while in Buffalo, New York. After a nine year MLB career, he was in the minors trying to get back to the majors after a shoulder injury. Among the drugs he has used are Deca-Durabolin, amphetamines, human growth hormone and Clenbuterol. Prior to the use of performance enhancing drugs he had earned a total of $1 million; subsequently he has earned $9 million. His ERA dropped by a run
On Bonds you are incorrect that he didn't have the same sort of offensive impact before he "allegedly" started juicing. He was the best offensive player in baseball winning three MVPs, nine of ten seasons with 30 or more homers, ten of his first 11 seasons with more than 29 steals, back to back seasons in 93 and 94 of 200 OPS +, and six seasons with more than 290 total bases. So you're wrong. Even though he has better pure hitting years since 2000 he still strung together the best stats of any player in the 1990s considering his gold gloves, his steals, and his run production. He was the best player before 2000, and the best player after.
Much of what you wrote above references cocaine and amphetamines. Cocaine is certainly not a performance enhancing drug, and is actually more likely deleterious to performance. As someone who works with many pharmacologists, some of whom specialize in amphetamine research, I come from a perspective that amphetamines are relatively innocuous performance-enhancers. They may make you faster on a finger-tapping test, but any benefit to coordination of large muscle mass is very unlikely. And, the jury is still out on the effects it has on attentional resources. Certainly, there is some modest benefit to some individuals, but many--both ADHD and healthy controls--see little-to-no benefit. And, no, Bonds did not have the same offensive impact before juicing. Was he great before? Absolutely. HOFer. One of the three best (not THE best, but among the top 3). But, he had not near the impact during his best years as all-around player as he had in his roided-up seasons. So, no, you're wrong.

ETA: I love your "allegedly" insert, in reference to whether Bonds used steroids/HGH or not. That made me laugh.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
a lot of these names have already come up, but here goes:

pretty much a lock:

Barry Bonds

Jason Giambi

Jeremy Giambi

Gary Sheffield

Armado Rios

Benito Santiago

Alex Sanchez (lol)

Rafael Palmeiro

Marvin Bernard

Mark McGwire

Brady Anderson

Jason Grimsley

Ken Caminiti

Jose Canseco

strong speculation:

Sammy Sosa

Brett Boone

Eric Gagne

Miguel Tejada

Brian Giles

Marcus Giles

Nomar Garciaparra

Todd Helton

Dante Bichette

Vinny Castilla

Ivan Rodriguez

Gary Matthews Jr.

Juan Gonzalez

Lenny Dykstra

Darren Daulton

Todd Hundley

Henry Rodriguez

Raul Mondesi

Albert Belle

Jay Bell

Carlos Baerga

Phil Nevin

possibly (wouldn't surprise me):

Roger Clemens

Jeff Bagwell

John Wettland

Brendan Donnelly

Greg Vaughn

Mike Sweeney

Jim Edmonds

Edgardo Alfonzo

Tony Batista

Luis Gonzalez

 
Much of what you wrote above references cocaine and amphetamines. Cocaine is certainly not a performance enhancing drug, and is actually more likely deleterious to performance. As someone who works with many pharmacologists, some of whom specialize in amphetamine research, I come from a perspective that amphetamines are relatively innocuous performance-enhancers. They may make you faster on a finger-tapping test, but any benefit to coordination of large muscle mass is very unlikely. And, the jury is still out on the effects it has on attentional resources. Certainly, there is some modest benefit to some individuals, but many--both ADHD and healthy controls--see little-to-no benefit. And, no, Bonds did not have the same offensive impact before juicing. Was he great before? Absolutely. HOFer. One of the three best (not THE best, but among the top 3). But, he had not near the impact during his best years as all-around player as he had in his roided-up seasons. So, no, you're wrong.ETA: I love your "allegedly" insert, in reference to whether Bonds used steroids/HGH or not. That made me laugh.
:thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: I love the backpedal here. So amphetamines aren't performance enhancers? That would make your argument wouldn't it? You make me laugh thinking your venerable Yankees aren't as dirty as the rest of the era. Unfortunately you're delusional, and probably so far in denial that you will continue to bash Bonds yet never accept the accountability that is warranted for the New York Yankees a team that has benefited most from steroids and the steroid era. Maybe you should take up acting in Soap Operas because your denial is of epic proportions. Have it your way, I'm easy. :thumbdown:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Im curious DD, what drives your crusade for equality of treatment for Bonds?

Cause our society treats people with more fame and money differently in all endevours. Add his status as the best player with the most hollowed records to Bonds admitting to using a substance proven to be steroids, and I see no reason to expect people to treat him like anyone else. He's just receiving the star treatment equal to his status.

And sorry, no matter what you say, Im going to boo Bonds. He's been a world class ##### for 20 years, so I don't see the reason I'd suddenly want to root for him.

 
I am inclined to agree with DD. My hope is that the same vitriol spewed in Bonds direction is shared with at just about anyone else in baseball who "knew" something abnormal was going on but did nothing about it... including Selig, members of the media, players, trainers, managers, etc. The list of guilty parties is very long.

It seems that Bonds is being targeted simply because he's been successful.

The ultimate culpability for this whole situation lies with league administration. But sadly, I don't think they would have done anything different had they known what the future held, as the financial benefits of the steroid era have, up to this point, far out-weighed the negative perceptions.

While booing Barry is fine, I think to do so solely due to the steroid issue is naive. Either that or your voice should be hoarse because you're also booing almost everyone else who steps on a baseball diamond.

 
Im curious DD, what drives your crusade for equality of treatment for Bonds? Cause our society treats people with more fame and money differently in all endevours. Add his status as the best player with the most hollowed records to Bonds admitting to using a substance proven to be steroids, and I see no reason to expect people to treat him like anyone else. He's just receiving the star treatment equal to his status.And sorry, no matter what you say, Im going to boo Bonds. He's been a world class ##### for 20 years, so I don't see the reason I'd suddenly want to root for him.
I think most people who are really like pulling the steriods card just don't like the guy. I could care less if you don't like him, it makes no difference to me as a baseball fan. My point is plain and simple: He's the best player of his era and that era is filled with players who cut corners in a varity of ways. I think as a fan I have trouble with people specifically directing all, not just some of their ire at Bonds. If this was McGuire approaching this record or doing what Bonds has done I know people would have a lot less trouble with it. Is it because McGuire is a big lovable nice guy? Is it because he's white? I see a lot of cross pollination in this whole thing with racism and people's disdain for cheating coming to a head (no pun intended) with Bonds. All I want is for people to admit he was the best player of his era because that is a fact. The numbers say so, and a keen eye for baseball says so. The sad thing for Bonds is he could have just continued to hit 40 HRs and knock in 120 runs and do all those other things and gotten to basically the same place he is now. Not sure if he'd be on Aaron's heels, but he probably would be past Mays. He is that good.
 
Much of what you wrote above references cocaine and amphetamines. Cocaine is certainly not a performance enhancing drug, and is actually more likely deleterious to performance. As someone who works with many pharmacologists, some of whom specialize in amphetamine research, I come from a perspective that amphetamines are relatively innocuous performance-enhancers. They may make you faster on a finger-tapping test, but any benefit to coordination of large muscle mass is very unlikely. And, the jury is still out on the effects it has on attentional resources. Certainly, there is some modest benefit to some individuals, but many--both ADHD and healthy controls--see little-to-no benefit. And, no, Bonds did not have the same offensive impact before juicing. Was he great before? Absolutely. HOFer. One of the three best (not THE best, but among the top 3). But, he had not near the impact during his best years as all-around player as he had in his roided-up seasons. So, no, you're wrong.ETA: I love your "allegedly" insert, in reference to whether Bonds used steroids/HGH or not. That made me laugh.
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: I love the backpedal here. So amphetamines aren't performance enhancers? That would make your argument wouldn't it? You make me laugh thinking your venerable Yankees aren't as dirty as the rest of the era. Unfortunately you're delusional, and probably so far in denial that you will continue to bash Bonds yet never accept the accountability that is warranted for the New York Yankees a team that has benefited most from steroids and the steroid era. Maybe you should take up acting in Soap Operas because your denial is of epic proportions. Have it your way, I'm easy. :lmao:
I won't fault you for not knowing anything about amphetamines. But, I will fault you for not showing up with some evidence on that Yankees team, but acting like it's gospel that they benefited any more than the next team from the steroids era.GL with that.
 
Im curious DD, what drives your crusade for equality of treatment for Bonds? Cause our society treats people with more fame and money differently in all endevours. Add his status as the best player with the most hollowed records to Bonds admitting to using a substance proven to be steroids, and I see no reason to expect people to treat him like anyone else. He's just receiving the star treatment equal to his status.And sorry, no matter what you say, Im going to boo Bonds. He's been a world class ##### for 20 years, so I don't see the reason I'd suddenly want to root for him.
I think most people who are really like pulling the steriods card just don't like the guy. I could care less if you don't like him, it makes no difference to me as a baseball fan. My point is plain and simple: He's the best player of his era and that era is filled with players who cut corners in a varity of ways. I think as a fan I have trouble with people specifically directing all, not just some of their ire at Bonds. If this was McGuire approaching this record or doing what Bonds has done I know people would have a lot less trouble with it. Is it because McGuire is a big lovable nice guy? Is it because he's white? I see a lot of cross pollination in this whole thing with racism and people's disdain for cheating coming to a head (no pun intended) with Bonds. All I want is for people to admit he was the best player of his era because that is a fact. The numbers say so, and a keen eye for baseball says so. The sad thing for Bonds is he could have just continued to hit 40 HRs and knock in 120 runs and do all those other things and gotten to basically the same place he is now. Not sure if he'd be on Aaron's heels, but he probably would be past Mays. He is that good.
McGuire probably wouldn't be as villified as Bonds, and a ton of that has to do with Bonds as a person. He alienated everyone, and while McGuire wasn't too keen on the press of the fame aspect of sports, he certainly came around some during his chase of Maris. And Im also sure that for some segment of the population race would play a factor, but there are just so many other reasons to hate Bonds that Im not about to pin this on racism. Geez, just his comments about impending strikes are enough to hate him to this day. As for him being the best player of this era, I don't think anyone really disagrees with that. Though a case can be made for Ricky, and Griffey was on track before his injury troubles. You could also include ARod in Bonds' era and he's got a chance to pass him. Alternatively, Clemens could certainly make a claim as the best player of this era. Fact is, prior to 98 Bonds was the best player of his era, its just a question of how much you value his accomplishments after he obviously started using steroids. And therein causes the problem when comparing him historically - which is where his records will carry a taint.
 
Much of what you wrote above references cocaine and amphetamines. Cocaine is certainly not a performance enhancing drug, and is actually more likely deleterious to performance. As someone who works with many pharmacologists, some of whom specialize in amphetamine research, I come from a perspective that amphetamines are relatively innocuous performance-enhancers. They may make you faster on a finger-tapping test, but any benefit to coordination of large muscle mass is very unlikely. And, the jury is still out on the effects it has on attentional resources. Certainly, there is some modest benefit to some individuals, but many--both ADHD and healthy controls--see little-to-no benefit. And, no, Bonds did not have the same offensive impact before juicing. Was he great before? Absolutely. HOFer. One of the three best (not THE best, but among the top 3). But, he had not near the impact during his best years as all-around player as he had in his roided-up seasons. So, no, you're wrong.ETA: I love your "allegedly" insert, in reference to whether Bonds used steroids/HGH or not. That made me laugh.
:excited: :lmao: :lmao: I love the backpedal here. So amphetamines aren't performance enhancers? That would make your argument wouldn't it? You make me laugh thinking your venerable Yankees aren't as dirty as the rest of the era. Unfortunately you're delusional, and probably so far in denial that you will continue to bash Bonds yet never accept the accountability that is warranted for the New York Yankees a team that has benefited most from steroids and the steroid era. Maybe you should take up acting in Soap Operas because your denial is of epic proportions. Have it your way, I'm easy. :popcorn:
I won't fault you for not knowing anything about amphetamines. But, I will fault you for not showing up with some evidence on that Yankees team, but acting like it's gospel that they benefited any more than the next team from the steroids era.GL with that.
Steve Howe is dead, I guess that isn't even enough for you because you are in complete denial. Jason Grimsley in 98 and on? Want me to link? Dwight Gooden? Want me to link? I'm now officially bored with you. :bye:
 
Im curious DD, what drives your crusade for equality of treatment for Bonds? Cause our society treats people with more fame and money differently in all endevours. Add his status as the best player with the most hollowed records to Bonds admitting to using a substance proven to be steroids, and I see no reason to expect people to treat him like anyone else. He's just receiving the star treatment equal to his status.And sorry, no matter what you say, Im going to boo Bonds. He's been a world class ##### for 20 years, so I don't see the reason I'd suddenly want to root for him.
I think most people who are really like pulling the steriods card just don't like the guy. I could care less if you don't like him, it makes no difference to me as a baseball fan. My point is plain and simple: He's the best player of his era and that era is filled with players who cut corners in a varity of ways. I think as a fan I have trouble with people specifically directing all, not just some of their ire at Bonds. If this was McGuire approaching this record or doing what Bonds has done I know people would have a lot less trouble with it. Is it because McGuire is a big lovable nice guy? Is it because he's white? I see a lot of cross pollination in this whole thing with racism and people's disdain for cheating coming to a head (no pun intended) with Bonds. All I want is for people to admit he was the best player of his era because that is a fact. The numbers say so, and a keen eye for baseball says so. The sad thing for Bonds is he could have just continued to hit 40 HRs and knock in 120 runs and do all those other things and gotten to basically the same place he is now. Not sure if he'd be on Aaron's heels, but he probably would be past Mays. He is that good.
McGuire probably wouldn't be as villified as Bonds, and a ton of that has to do with Bonds as a person. He alienated everyone, and while McGuire wasn't too keen on the press of the fame aspect of sports, he certainly came around some during his chase of Maris. And Im also sure that for some segment of the population race would play a factor, but there are just so many other reasons to hate Bonds that Im not about to pin this on racism. Geez, just his comments about impending strikes are enough to hate him to this day. As for him being the best player of this era, I don't think anyone really disagrees with that. Though a case can be made for Ricky, and Griffey was on track before his injury troubles. You could also include ARod in Bonds' era and he's got a chance to pass him. Alternatively, Clemens could certainly make a claim as the best player of this era. Fact is, prior to 98 Bonds was the best player of his era, its just a question of how much you value his accomplishments after he obviously started using steroids. And therein causes the problem when comparing him historically - which is where his records will carry a taint.
Thanks for at least making an effort to formulate a cogent post with legitimate arguments when speaking of Bonds. I don't agree with all your assessments but I certainly find your reasoning very sound. Can't say that for too many people who hate Bonds.
 
Doctor Detroit said:
cobalt_27 said:
Doctor Detroit said:
Much of what you wrote above references cocaine and amphetamines. Cocaine is certainly not a performance enhancing drug, and is actually more likely deleterious to performance. As someone who works with many pharmacologists, some of whom specialize in amphetamine research, I come from a perspective that amphetamines are relatively innocuous performance-enhancers. They may make you faster on a finger-tapping test, but any benefit to coordination of large muscle mass is very unlikely. And, the jury is still out on the effects it has on attentional resources. Certainly, there is some modest benefit to some individuals, but many--both ADHD and healthy controls--see little-to-no benefit.

And, no, Bonds did not have the same offensive impact before juicing. Was he great before? Absolutely. HOFer. One of the three best (not THE best, but among the top 3). But, he had not near the impact during his best years as all-around player as he had in his roided-up seasons. So, no, you're wrong.

ETA: I love your "allegedly" insert, in reference to whether Bonds used steroids/HGH or not. That made me laugh.
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: I love the backpedal here. So amphetamines aren't performance enhancers? That would make your argument wouldn't it? You make me laugh thinking your venerable Yankees aren't as dirty as the rest of the era. Unfortunately you're delusional, and probably so far in denial that you will continue to bash Bonds yet never accept the accountability that is warranted for the New York Yankees a team that has benefited most from steroids and the steroid era. Maybe you should take up acting in Soap Operas because your denial is of epic proportions. Have it your way, I'm easy. :bye:
I won't fault you for not knowing anything about amphetamines. But, I will fault you for not showing up with some evidence on that Yankees team, but acting like it's gospel that they benefited any more than the next team from the steroids era.GL with that.
Steve Howe is dead, I guess that isn't even enough for you because you are in complete denial. Jason Grimsley in 98 and on? Want me to link? Dwight Gooden? Want me to link? I'm now officially bored with you. :bye:
And, you still can't answer the challenge. You may be bored, but I think confusion is your biggest issue right now.If you want to give it another shot, I'll repeat one more time, and I'll talk really slowly here to help you follow along...

What is the evidence that the Yankees benefited from performance-enhancing drugs during that '96 season?

Again, GL with that.

 
Geez, I don't know who is letting McGwire off easy. The guy crushed arguably the most celebrated record in American sports to unprecedented fanfare and was hailed (at the time) as the guy who saved baseball... fast forward to Hall of Fame eligibility, and he can't get anywhere NEAR the votes needed. He's a liar and a cheat, and that's his legacy. The difference is that he's retired, and while he started the controversy, the questions about Bonds have dogging him ever since, while he ws an active player. McGwire paid the price, look at the guy. Bonds still flaunts it. And worst of all, he never needed to. He didn't need to get a leg up on the competition. He might have been the best player in the game without it. With it, he's just a dog padding his stats, running down records from guys who earned them the old fashioned way. He would have been great. Now he's just a symbol of where baseball went wrong.

Who didn't use steroids? Well for one... Ken Griffey Jr.

I think he rises above all of this. He got lost in the shuffle plodding along with what seemed to be modest numbers as his contemporaries bloated their stats. Yet steadily, he's delivered the kind of career that would make his father and his father's colleagues proud. He had a spell of injuries, but he's been the kind of ballplayer that every parent wants their kids to look up to.

 
And, you still can't answer the challenge. You may be bored, but I think confusion is your biggest issue right now.

If you want to give it another shot, I'll repeat one more time, and I'll talk really slowly here to help you follow along...

What is the evidence that the Yankees benefited from performance-enhancing drugs during that '96 season?

Again, GL with that.
So now it's "performance enhancers" only? That's hilarious because you think it fits your argument and you don't include amphetamines in that definition as you've already established. What "evidence" is there that any of these guys ever used "performance enhancers" outside of Bonds claim of accidental use, Giambi's tip toeing, and McGuire just ignoring the whole thing? Andro? Creatine? Designer steriod creams? What we do know is that players have taken amphetamines for a very long time and that Jose Canseco apparently didn't care who knew he was juicing. Steve Bechler died after using ephedra. I know that isn't a performance enhancer in you book but amphetamines are performance enhancers and cocaine can be used to enhance performance as well. We do have a positive test from Palmiero and Jason Grimsley admitting he used since 1998 to avoid a heavy jail term. The point of most fans anger is that there were so any players who used and it’s obvious. Why do you hate Bonds? Because he used but what evidence do we really have? Did anyone ever see him shoot anything?

During grand jury testimony on December 4, 2003 — which was obtained through unknown means by the San Francisco Chronicle (leaking grand jury testimony is a felony) and published almost a year later, on December 3, 2004 — Bonds allegedly said Anderson gave him a rubbing balm and a liquid substance that Anderson said was arthritis cream and flaxseed oil, respectively.[21] The prosecutors contended that what Bonds was actually given was "the cream" and "the clear", which are both forms of the designer steroid THG.
So what does that say really? To someone with any common sense it says he was using before 2004 maybe as early as 2000. But what evidence is there? Just like it takes only common sense to figure out Dwight Gooden, Darryl Strawberry, and Steve Howe (released in 1996 by the Yankees for unspecified reasons) were using cocaine, amphetamines, and probably just about anything because these guys were actually addicted to drugs. But you’re right, I have no proof. Neither do people saying Bonds used steroids prior to 2004. Since no one has been convicted, only a few have tested positive, and most of this stuff wasn’t in the testing program it becomes a baseball problem but again, where is the evidence? Isn’t common sense really enough? Maybe not if you have to switch definitions around and deny to protect your own opinion that your team was clean. No one was clean, that’s the point. :wall: You want to talk evidence? Ok, I’ll play your little game. Show me where Bonds used steroids prior to 2004. glllll with that.

Here is some side reading on the Yankee Pharmacy techs:

1982 — Enters drug rehabilitation after the season.

June 29, 1983 — Fined one month's salary ($53,867) and placed on probation by the Dodgers after admitting a drug problem.

July 15, 1983 — Reported late for game and suspended two days by the Dodgers.

September 23, 1983 — Missed team flight to Atlanta and suspended indefinitely by the Dodgers for what the team says is cocaine dependency. Goes into substance abuse rehabilitation.

December 15, 1983 — Suspended for one year by Commissioner Bowie Kuhn for cocaine use.

May 1984 — In a grievance settlement, agreed not to play in 1984.

June 23, 1985 — Fined $300 by Los Angeles for arriving three hours late for a game.

July 1, 1985 — Placed on the restricted list by the National League for three days at the Dodgers' request after missing a game against Atlanta. Released by the Dodgers two days later.

August 12, 1985 — Signed by the Minnesota Twins, but released a month later after missing three games with what the team said was a "temporary recurrence" of cocaine problem.

March 20, 1986 — Signed by San Jose of the California League.

May 15, 1986 — Suspended by the National Association of Professional Baseball Leagues after allegedly testing positive for cocaine. The following month he was suspended again through December 31 for the same reason; San Jose released him the day his suspension was over.

July 11, 1987 — Signed by Oklahoma City of the Class AAA American Association; the Texas Rangers purchased his contract the following month.

November 1987 — Agreed to two-year, $1.2 million contract with Texas.

January 19, 1988 — Released by Texas after violating aftercare program by using alcohol.

April 4, 1990 — Signs contract with Salinas of the California League.

February 1991 — Signs contract with Columbus of the International League.

May 9, 1991 — Contract purchased by the New York Yankees.

November 5, 1991 — Signs one-year contract with the New York Yankees.

December 19, 1991 — Arrested on cocaine charges in Kalispell, Montana.

June 8, 1992 — Suspended indefinitely after pleading guilty in U.S. District Court in Missoula, Montana, to a misdemeanor charge of attempting to buy a gram of cocaine.

June 24, 1992 — Suspended permanently by Commissioner Fay Vincent.

August 18, 1992 — Fined the minimum $1,000 and ordered him to perform 100 hours of community service by a federal judge in Montana and placed on probation.

November 11, 1992 — Reinstated by a baseball arbitrator.

1993 - Has 3-5 Win-Loss record, 4 Saves, 19 Strikeouts and 4.97 ERA for Yankees.

1994 - Has 3-0 Win-Loss record, 15 Saves, 18 Strikeouts and 1.80 ERA for Yankees.

1995 - Has 6-3 Win-Loss record, 2 Saves, 28 Strikeouts and 4.96 ERA for Yankees.

June 22, 1996 — Released by Yankees.

June 24, 1996 — Arrested and charged with criminal possession of a weapon at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York when a police officer spots a loaded .357 Magnum pistol in his carry-on baggage.

April 1997 — Signs with the Sioux Falls Canaries of the independent Northern League in comeback attempt at age 39 but quits midseason because of an arm injury.

August 19, 1997 — Critically injured in a motorcycle crash and later charged with driving while intoxicated. Charges later dropped after prosecutors decided his blood test was improperly obtained.

April 1, 1999 — Suspended as a volunteer coach for his daughter's softball team in Whitefish, Montana.

April 28, 2006 — Dies in a one-vehicle car accident in Coachella, California, when his pickup truck rolls over in the early morning.

June 28, 2006 — The coroner's office of Valencia reports that toxicological results determined there was methamphetamine in his bloodstream at the time of his April 28, 2006 accident.
Though drug abuse is commonly blamed for Gooden's pitching troubles, some analysts point to his early workload. It has been estimated that Gooden threw over 10,800 pitches from 1983-85, a period in which he was just 18 to 20 years old.[1] Gooden hurled 276 innings in his historic 1985 season; in the 20 years since, only two pitchers have reached that amount, both in 1987. By the time he reached his 21st birthday, Gooden had already accumulated 928 strikeouts between both the minor and major leagues.

Gooden was accused along with two other teammates with rape in 1991, however, charges were never pressed. 1992 was Gooden's first-ever losing season (10-13); it was also the first time he had lost as many as 10 decisions. 1993 was no improvement, as Gooden finished 12-15 for a desultory Mets team. During the 1993 season, Sports Illustrated ran a cover story on Gooden entitled,"From Phenom to Phantom."

In 1994 at age 29, Gooden had a 3-4 record with a 6.31 ERA when he tested positive for cocaine use and was suspended for 60 days. He tested positive again while serving the suspension, and was further suspended for the entire 1995 season. The day after receiving the second suspension, Gooden's wife, Monica, found him in his bedroom with a loaded gun to his head.
On April 3, 1999, Strawberry was arrested in Tampa, Florida for soliciting sex from a police woman posing as a prostitute and for having a small amount of cocaine. On April 24, he was suspended for 140 days by Major League Baseball for the incident. On May 29, he pleaded no contest to the charges and was sentenced to 21 months probation and community service. [4]

On January 2, 2000, Strawberry tested positive for cocaine. On March 15, shortly after the test result was announced, Major League Baseball announced that he would be suspended for one year. Six days later, he was in rehab.

On September 11, 2000, in Tampa, Strawberry tried to drive to see his probation officer after taking painkillers. While driving, he blacked out, rear-ended another car, and then tried to drive away. An off-duty police officer witnessed the episode and arrested him at gunpoint. The next day, Strawberry admitted to the charges and his probation was changed to two years of house arrest. On November 21, he was sentenced to a year of probation and community service. [6]
Member of the 2000 Yankees: Jose Canseco

Grimsley confessed to the use of human growth hormones, amphetamines and steroids in 2003.[7]

His drug use began in 1998 while in Buffalo, New York. After a nine year MLB career, he was in the minors trying to get back to the majors after a shoulder injury. Among the drugs he has used are Deca-Durabolin, amphetamines, human growth hormone and Clenbuterol. Prior to the use of performance enhancing drugs he had earned a total of $1 million; subsequently he has earned $9 million. His ERA dropped by a run.
 
Doctor Detroit said:
And, you still can't answer the challenge. You may be bored, but I think confusion is your biggest issue right now.

If you want to give it another shot, I'll repeat one more time, and I'll talk really slowly here to help you follow along...

What is the evidence that the Yankees benefited from performance-enhancing drugs during that '96 season?

Again, GL with that.
So now it's "performance enhancers" only? That's hilarious because you think it fits your argument and you don't include amphetamines in that definition as you've already established. What "evidence" is there that any of these guys ever used "performance enhancers" outside of Bonds claim of accidental use, Giambi's tip toeing, and McGuire just ignoring the whole thing? Andro? Creatine? Designer steriod creams? What we do know is that players have taken amphetamines for a very long time and that Jose Canseco apparently didn't care who knew he was juicing. Steve Bechler died after using ephedra. I know that isn't a performance enhancer in you book but amphetamines are performance enhancers and cocaine can be used to enhance performance as well. We do have a positive test from Palmiero and Jason Grimsley admitting he used since 1998 to avoid a heavy jail term. The point of most fans anger is that there were so any players who used and it’s obvious. Why do you hate Bonds? Because he used but what evidence do we really have? Did anyone ever see him shoot anything?

During grand jury testimony on December 4, 2003 — which was obtained through unknown means by the San Francisco Chronicle (leaking grand jury testimony is a felony) and published almost a year later, on December 3, 2004 — Bonds allegedly said Anderson gave him a rubbing balm and a liquid substance that Anderson said was arthritis cream and flaxseed oil, respectively.[21] The prosecutors contended that what Bonds was actually given was "the cream" and "the clear", which are both forms of the designer steroid THG.
So what does that say really? To someone with any common sense it says he was using before 2004 maybe as early as 2000. But what evidence is there? Just like it takes only common sense to figure out Dwight Gooden, Darryl Strawberry, and Steve Howe (released in 1996 by the Yankees for unspecified reasons) were using cocaine, amphetamines, and probably just about anything because these guys were actually addicted to drugs. But you’re right, I have no proof. Neither do people saying Bonds used steroids prior to 2004. Since no one has been convicted, only a few have tested positive, and most of this stuff wasn’t in the testing program it becomes a baseball problem but again, where is the evidence? Isn’t common sense really enough? Maybe not if you have to switch definitions around and deny to protect your own opinion that your team was clean. No one was clean, that’s the point. :shrug: You want to talk evidence? Ok, I’ll play your little game. Show me where Bonds used steroids prior to 2004. glllll with that.

Here is some side reading on the Yankee Pharmacy techs:

1982 — Enters drug rehabilitation after the season.

June 29, 1983 — Fined one month's salary ($53,867) and placed on probation by the Dodgers after admitting a drug problem.

July 15, 1983 — Reported late for game and suspended two days by the Dodgers.

September 23, 1983 — Missed team flight to Atlanta and suspended indefinitely by the Dodgers for what the team says is cocaine dependency. Goes into substance abuse rehabilitation.

December 15, 1983 — Suspended for one year by Commissioner Bowie Kuhn for cocaine use.

May 1984 — In a grievance settlement, agreed not to play in 1984.

June 23, 1985 — Fined $300 by Los Angeles for arriving three hours late for a game.

July 1, 1985 — Placed on the restricted list by the National League for three days at the Dodgers' request after missing a game against Atlanta. Released by the Dodgers two days later.

August 12, 1985 — Signed by the Minnesota Twins, but released a month later after missing three games with what the team said was a "temporary recurrence" of cocaine problem.

March 20, 1986 — Signed by San Jose of the California League.

May 15, 1986 — Suspended by the National Association of Professional Baseball Leagues after allegedly testing positive for cocaine. The following month he was suspended again through December 31 for the same reason; San Jose released him the day his suspension was over.

July 11, 1987 — Signed by Oklahoma City of the Class AAA American Association; the Texas Rangers purchased his contract the following month.

November 1987 — Agreed to two-year, $1.2 million contract with Texas.

January 19, 1988 — Released by Texas after violating aftercare program by using alcohol.

April 4, 1990 — Signs contract with Salinas of the California League.

February 1991 — Signs contract with Columbus of the International League.

May 9, 1991 — Contract purchased by the New York Yankees.

November 5, 1991 — Signs one-year contract with the New York Yankees.

December 19, 1991 — Arrested on cocaine charges in Kalispell, Montana.

June 8, 1992 — Suspended indefinitely after pleading guilty in U.S. District Court in Missoula, Montana, to a misdemeanor charge of attempting to buy a gram of cocaine.

June 24, 1992 — Suspended permanently by Commissioner Fay Vincent.

August 18, 1992 — Fined the minimum $1,000 and ordered him to perform 100 hours of community service by a federal judge in Montana and placed on probation.

November 11, 1992 — Reinstated by a baseball arbitrator.

1993 - Has 3-5 Win-Loss record, 4 Saves, 19 Strikeouts and 4.97 ERA for Yankees.

1994 - Has 3-0 Win-Loss record, 15 Saves, 18 Strikeouts and 1.80 ERA for Yankees.

1995 - Has 6-3 Win-Loss record, 2 Saves, 28 Strikeouts and 4.96 ERA for Yankees.

June 22, 1996 — Released by Yankees.

June 24, 1996 — Arrested and charged with criminal possession of a weapon at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York when a police officer spots a loaded .357 Magnum pistol in his carry-on baggage.

April 1997 — Signs with the Sioux Falls Canaries of the independent Northern League in comeback attempt at age 39 but quits midseason because of an arm injury.

August 19, 1997 — Critically injured in a motorcycle crash and later charged with driving while intoxicated. Charges later dropped after prosecutors decided his blood test was improperly obtained.

April 1, 1999 — Suspended as a volunteer coach for his daughter's softball team in Whitefish, Montana.

April 28, 2006 — Dies in a one-vehicle car accident in Coachella, California, when his pickup truck rolls over in the early morning.

June 28, 2006 — The coroner's office of Valencia reports that toxicological results determined there was methamphetamine in his bloodstream at the time of his April 28, 2006 accident.
Though drug abuse is commonly blamed for Gooden's pitching troubles, some analysts point to his early workload. It has been estimated that Gooden threw over 10,800 pitches from 1983-85, a period in which he was just 18 to 20 years old.[1] Gooden hurled 276 innings in his historic 1985 season; in the 20 years since, only two pitchers have reached that amount, both in 1987. By the time he reached his 21st birthday, Gooden had already accumulated 928 strikeouts between both the minor and major leagues.

Gooden was accused along with two other teammates with rape in 1991, however, charges were never pressed. 1992 was Gooden's first-ever losing season (10-13); it was also the first time he had lost as many as 10 decisions. 1993 was no improvement, as Gooden finished 12-15 for a desultory Mets team. During the 1993 season, Sports Illustrated ran a cover story on Gooden entitled,"From Phenom to Phantom."

In 1994 at age 29, Gooden had a 3-4 record with a 6.31 ERA when he tested positive for cocaine use and was suspended for 60 days. He tested positive again while serving the suspension, and was further suspended for the entire 1995 season. The day after receiving the second suspension, Gooden's wife, Monica, found him in his bedroom with a loaded gun to his head.
On April 3, 1999, Strawberry was arrested in Tampa, Florida for soliciting sex from a police woman posing as a prostitute and for having a small amount of cocaine. On April 24, he was suspended for 140 days by Major League Baseball for the incident. On May 29, he pleaded no contest to the charges and was sentenced to 21 months probation and community service. [4]

On January 2, 2000, Strawberry tested positive for cocaine. On March 15, shortly after the test result was announced, Major League Baseball announced that he would be suspended for one year. Six days later, he was in rehab.

On September 11, 2000, in Tampa, Strawberry tried to drive to see his probation officer after taking painkillers. While driving, he blacked out, rear-ended another car, and then tried to drive away. An off-duty police officer witnessed the episode and arrested him at gunpoint. The next day, Strawberry admitted to the charges and his probation was changed to two years of house arrest. On November 21, he was sentenced to a year of probation and community service. [6]
Member of the 2000 Yankees: Jose Canseco

Grimsley confessed to the use of human growth hormones, amphetamines and steroids in 2003.[7]

His drug use began in 1998 while in Buffalo, New York. After a nine year MLB career, he was in the minors trying to get back to the majors after a shoulder injury. Among the drugs he has used are Deca-Durabolin, amphetamines, human growth hormone and Clenbuterol. Prior to the use of performance enhancing drugs he had earned a total of $1 million; subsequently he has earned $9 million. His ERA dropped by a run.
Look, the title of this whole freaking thing is "Official Juicer thread...all steroids all the time." If anyone's out to change the rules of this discussion midstream, it's been you. But, based on the opinions of people who really know this stuff--not the media types, who quite often know nothing--amphetamines really aren't performance-enhancing beyond increased vigilance, attention span, and maybe a bit better on a finger-tapping exercise. It's highly doubtful the gains realized in baseball live up to the hysteria--or to what benefits one gets from steroids.Besides, I keep asking you to please offer evidence for these folks:

For Cobalt 27:

1996 New York Yankees:

John Wettland

Paul O'Neil (roid rage)

Reuben Sierra

Jim Leyritz

Gerald Williams (freakishly fast in Sega based baseball games which makes me suspicious)
...and you've come up with zilch.As for the evidence of Bonds, maybe you've had your head in the sand or have been living in a cave (or are, otherwise, in recidivist denial), but you can get a summary in Fainaru-Wada/Williams' book that includes, but is not limited to, the following:

1. Jim Valente told IRS agents that Bonds received The Cream and Clear from BALCO (and that he provided these drugs to Greg Anderson to give to Bonds. Valente later pleaded guilty to steroids conspiracy charge related to these activities.

2. Victor Conte gave an identical account of Anderson bringing Bonds to BALCO and his later use of C & C.

3. Olympic shot-putter, C.J. Hunter, told feds that Conte and he discussed Bonds's use of the Clear.

4. In the U.S. grand jury testimony, Kimberly Bell (Bonds's former girlfriend) said that Bonds confided in her that he was on roids.

5. Sheffield testified that he saw Bonds taking C & C.

6. Documents were seized at Anderson's apartment that included a folder containing doping calendars detailing Bonds's schedule and use of steroids, along with payment entries from Bonds.

7. Anderson was outed with a secret recording where he acknoledged that Bonds was using "undetectable performance-enhancing" drugs to beat baseball's drug tests.

And, we haven't even begun to scratch the circumstantial, physical evidence that supports these accounts.

Of course, you seem to have a vested interest in exonerating Bonds, so you'll probably insist on continuing your mental gymnastics here suggesting that all these people are lying. :shrug: Hey, the O.J. jury was just as thick-headed, so I'm not surprised.

Point is, much evidence suggests Bonds used steroids, and you haven't offered one bit of evidence for the names you suggested above. Have some of the Yankees, along with other players, abused other drugs? Of course. No question. Did Grimsley, Giambi, Sheffield juice? I think it's virtually undeniable that they did. As a Giambi fan (never caring about Grimsley, and never liking Sheffield), I openly put him on my #### list (here, and with friends), and I think his latest comments have been utterly embarrassing and absurd.

But, unless you want to take the uneducated opinion that cocaine/amphetamines significantly improve performance, your position extends way beyond the scope of this topic's title...that YOU created...and was the only thing I was referencing, originally. I was calling you out on providing evidence of that '96 team using steroids, and you can't come up with anything. Did any of them? I imagine that's possible, if not likely, given what we now know about the scope of the problem. But, for you to suggest that steroids were so over-represented in the Yankee clubhouse, compared to all other teams, that they should have their WS rings stripped, is utterly laughable. Even I'm not claiming that Bonds's records be asterisked or wiped out. I just maintain that I, along with many others, will put his record(s) in their proper context...he cheated to obtain them.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top