JoeSteeler
Footballguy
Saw it comingI cant believe what im seeing right now. Steelers are going to piss this game away
Saw it comingI cant believe what im seeing right now. Steelers are going to piss this game away
This one can be laid at the feet of an "intent-to-injure" action by Thomas Davis, twisting his leg while holding him in midair.Seems like Conner gets dinged every game
That's what helped get them in this situationLet Hodges throw it deep here?
Missed thatThis one can be laid at the feet of an "intent-to-injure" action by Thomas Davis, twisting his leg while holding him in midair.
Not really reflective of injury-proneness tonight, although he does seem to get dinged a good bit.
disagree 100%Tomlin with a beautiful call there
Oh come on, we just want a 1st rounder in returnNo thanks. My nightmare scenario
I disagree. It's a probability excerise. The odds of the Chargers scoring a TD in a scenario where they have around a minute to go (pinned deep in their end) and no timeouts is pretty rare. If they stuff the steelers on 4th down (with a 3rd string QB and backup RB), they have more than a fighting chance. No reason at all to go for it IMO.disagree 100%
defense is gassed, go win the game with a FG attempt or run (preferable). punting has to be the lowest win % option
Agreed. Punting it was the correct call. Pinning them at the 1 was an awesome bonus.I disagree. It's a probability game. The odds of the Chargers scoring a TD in a scenario where they have around a minute to go and no timeouts is pretty rare. If they stuff the steelers on 4th down (with a 3rd string QB and backup RB), they have more than a fighting chance. No reason at all to go for it IMO.
I agree it's a probability game, but with that Steelers defense / inability to cover tight ends / on the field for the game, I don't like the punt. Not a guarantee you get them to start at the 1 either.I disagree. It's a probability game. The odds of the Chargers scoring a TD in a scenario where they have around a minute to go and no timeouts is pretty rare. If they stuff the steelers on 4th down (with a 3rd string QB and backup RB), they have more than a fighting chance. No reason at all to go for it IMO.
Yep! Chance they can go 99 yards in 1:30 with no timeouts was very lowI disagree. It's a probability game. The odds of the Chargers scoring a TD in a scenario where they have around a minute to go and no timeouts is pretty rare. If they stuff the steelers on 4th down (with a 3rd string QB and backup RB), they have more than a fighting chance. No reason at all to go for it IMO.
It worked out, but you controlled the line, Snell can get you a yard.Agreed. Punting it was the correct call. Pinning them at the 1 was an awesome bonus.
Would be cool to know the stats...maybe don't want to make the coaches look bad?I agree it's a probability game, but with that Steelers defense / inability to cover tight ends / on the field for the game, I don't like the punt. Not a guarantee you get them to start at the 1 either.
Wish they would have those stats ready and put them up there, as I'm curious to know what the actual percentages are -- where's next gen stats when you really want them.
Yup pinning them at the 1 is rare. But I think even if the Chargers started within their own 10-15, it's extremely unlikely that they win that game (with less than a minute and no timeouts).I agree it's a probability game, but with that Steelers defense / inability to cover tight ends / on the field for the game, I don't like the punt. Not a guarantee you get them to start at the 1 either.
Wish they would have those stats ready and put them up there, as I'm curious to know what the actual percentages are -- where's next gen stats when you really want them.
I think he's done a great job for the last month. Seems like he does his best coaching from a "getting the team ready to play" standpoint when expectations are low. 2-2 without Ben now, with the losses being narrow ones to the 5-0 49ers and 4-2 Ravens.If the Steelers lose this game, people will blame Tomlin (and I'm a big critic of Tomlin). He did a great job today IMO.
And what if he doesn't? Isn't the higher probability play to just punt and pin them down to the 10 or 15? Can they drive 85 to 90 yards with no timeouts against a pretty good defense? I think the odds are low.It worked out, but you controlled the line, Snell can get you a yard.
Does that link take into account that they had 0 timeouts? That's a huge factor IMO.http://archive.advancedfootballanalytics.com/2009/11/two-minute-drill.html
So maybe a 10-30% chance with the punt? Say 20% average. Honestly surprised it's that low, but I think you have to tweak the odds a bit with an experienced QB like Rivers, a gassed defense, etc.. probably more like 30-40% imho. but yeah, may have been the right call to punt, guessing a 4th and 1 is 50/50ish.
doesn't look like it, and i agree. did some more googling and I can't believe this isn't an easy findable stat, or one that's semi-common knowledge now (regardless of timeouts, at least we'd have an idea) given how big analytics is getting.Does that link take into account that they had 0 timeouts? That's a huge factor IMO.
It's so obvious that punting is correct nobody bothered to show the math onlinedoesn't look like it, and i agree. did some more googling and I can't believe this isn't an easy findable stat, or one that's semi-common knowledge now (regardless of timeouts, at least we'd have an idea) given how big analytics is getting.
given that the broadcasters thought punting was an afterthought and assumingly the worst possible option, i'm ready to concede my argument nowIt's so obvious that punting is correct nobody bothered to show the math online![]()
Now it would have been interesting had that punt been blocked.given that the broadcasters thought punting was an afterthought and assumingly the worst possible option, i'm ready to concede my argument now![]()