*** Official Onslaught Thread *** (1 Viewer)

[Buckychudd]

1

1 1 1

6

45 77 18

88 999

14 82

6

Pretty elegant, no?

 

[3MTA3]

11 1 1 645 77 1888 99914 826Pretty elegant, no?

Not bad but I'm not sure why you went with the cross-Frolov as the complement to your stacked introduction. I think you'd be much better off following it up with a simple prime combination....something along the lines of the Stalin (there's a reason why they call it that you know).

 

[Sweet J]

i love this place.

 

[Joe Paterno]

This might be my favorite thread in the history of the internet.

 

[3MTA3]

Here's what I was talking about with the Stalin

1

1 1 2

3 9000

6 60

3 4 3 00

14

8 2

6

Now looking at the results and the 3rd array....not sure if that truly is the correct thing to do.

 

[3MTA3]

Here's what I was talking about with the Stalin11 1 23 90006 603 4 3 00148 26Now looking at the results and the 3rd array....not sure if that truly is the correct thing to do.

Can I get a ruling here?

 

[Hipple Long Ware & Peete]

 

[RudiStein]

Bump for SeniorSnugbug

 

[AhrnCityPahnder]

I'd like to officially apologize to the onslaught community.

 

[Thread Killer]

I lost $600 in the last onslaught tourney. No way am I gonna get sucked back into this.

 

[Hipple Long Ware & Peete]

12. Icy Potsjwvdcw has some mind bending schtick. Best of luck there. The "pots" part of this refers to raking a pot in a poker game.

 

[AhrnCityPahnder]

I'd like to officially apologize to the onslaught community.

 

[Otis]

this has definitely run it's course. i thought i should be the first to tell you.

You can look back through these forums and find lots of tremendous swings and misses by pickles.

 

[Hipple Long Ware & Peete]

9 man:9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Nein Nein Nein Nein

 

[Assani Fisher]

Sometimes the simplest moves are the best. Check out how I reconstructed the bridge notes in this 3 man:

1 2 3

1 2 3

3

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3

1 2 3

 

[dickey moe]

Sometimes the simplest moves are the best. Check out how I reconstructed the bridge notes in this 3 man:1 2 31 2 333 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 31 2 3

That's a sly move after employing the Kerpuski Maneuver, but on the backside I'd try to run the following:1 2 33 2 123 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 32 1 3I spoke to Evan Morrison about this at tournament down in Redding a few months ago, and he swears by it. Pulled in $250K after taxes.

 

[Assani Fisher]

Sometimes the simplest moves are the best. Check out how I reconstructed the bridge notes in this 3 man: 1 2 3 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 1 2 3

That's a sly move after employing the Kerpuski Maneuver, but on the backside I'd try to run the following: 1 2 3 3 2 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 1 3 I spoke to Evan Morrison about this at tournament down in Redding a few months ago, and he swears by it. Pulled in $250K after taxes.

very interesting, thanks for the advice

 

[Otis]

Here's what I was talking about with the Stalin 1 1 1 2 3 9000 6 60 3 4 3 00 14 8 2 6 Now looking at the results and the 3rd array....not sure if that truly is the correct thing to do.

Can I get a ruling here?

That is not the right use for a Stalin, particularly if you saw bugged nines on the last rotation (which I'm assuming here, though you didn't post the full history). Just strikes me as trying too hard imo.

 

[phrozen]

Sometimes the simplest moves are the best. Check out how I reconstructed the bridge notes in this 3 man: 1 2 3 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 1 2 3

That's a sly move after employing the Kerpuski Maneuver, but on the backside I'd try to run the following: 1 2 3 3 2 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 1 3 I spoke to Evan Morrison about this at tournament down in Redding a few months ago, and he swears by it. Pulled in $250K after taxes.

very interesting, thanks for the advice

Sometimes the simplest moves are the best. Check out how I reconstructed the bridge notes in this 3 man: 1 2 3 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 1 2 3

That's a sly move after employing the Kerpuski Maneuver, but on the backside I'd try to run the following: 1 2 3 3 2 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 1 3 I spoke to Evan Morrison about this at tournament down in Redding a few months ago, and he swears by it. Pulled in $250K after taxes.

very interesting, thanks for the advice

:icypots:

 

[strykerpks]

Here's what I was talking about with the Stalin 1 1 1 2 3 9000 6 60 3 4 3 00 14 8 2 6 Now looking at the results and the 3rd array....not sure if that truly is the correct thing to do.

Can I get a ruling here?

That is not the right use for a Stalin, particularly if you saw bugged nines on the last rotation (which I'm assuming here, though you didn't post the full history). Just strikes me as trying too hard imo.

Look at the dates. This is sooo 2009.

I saw a guy get laughed out of the social room at an elderly home trying to pull this a few months ago when I was visiting my grandma. These people invented the Stalin. My grandma's boyfriend hammered out the Troskin Tactic followed by a Snoozeus Interruptus in the 13th....and it worked! It was fun to watch the old guys go back to their roots.

 

[Officer Pete Malloy]

Has anybody read Slominski's latest piece in "The Crier"?

He went on for about 2 pages on how the latest trend towards bunching primes while scattering repeats is nothing more than a throwback to "Shattuck's Ebb&Flow" from the mid-1970s. I understand his point (to an extent) but he really didn't provide any citation. If you ask me this recent trend with primes and repeats is more like short-lived Havana Swing fad from about 10 years ago.

Usually I find Slominski's work fairly accurate but this time I just dont' know. Does anyone else think this might be blow-back from the "Precious 9-3-9 Junta vs Eng et al" controversy back in '09?

 

[Officer Pete Malloy]

bump

 

[Chaka]

Are we really going to try this again?

 

[HellToupee]

Are we really going to try this again?

I just downloaded the app

 

[strykerpks]

I just downloaded the app

Is it the Swerski app? That's ####. He runs a modified Shilpa algorithm. I even heard his programmers are only working in  C++. That app can't even counter a basic Beigel Blitzkrieg with an Emma Gurell flank.