This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
No problem...if they will do the same...so far...seems others enjoy slinging crap around and blaming it on me yet again.But the history of this topic even shows its the same old crap with some people.Again...notice that I was discussing the topic...quite fine with other fans from other teams...stryker, stinger, and Benson? Not so much.At least call it for what it is. I will defend myself from that ridiculous crap though.
Fine I deleted it because I didn't want to be nasty. But since you asked for it, your a moron. Also not let things go? I was called out on what I said so I responded TO IT. I didn't randomly bring it up in another thread or days later.Also unlike you I was on topic to the forum, I know the only place you can be a bully is the internet without getting beat up but please take it elsewhere.Packseasontix can't let things go just like you.Packseasontix posts a nasty response to me in this thread, then deletes it.
Then you show up and criticize.
Finally, you laugh at something he posts.
It's because you ruin every thread you participate in.
Come on you know they should have put up 70 if they were seriously playing, lol.
But if Webb had been able to pass, the Packers wouldn't have been able to deal with him as easily. Kaepernick (or any qb who can run AND throw) is an entirely different beast from a qb who can only run.
Seacheats are not getting past Washington
trueif you did not see the game you cannot believe how bad Webb was. I mean truly, horrifically bad. That is not Kaep or Smith. Pack could be getting lucky in terms of the niners having so many recievers out
Agree 100%. Much better passing QB, far superior receivers....although let's be honest, Frank Gore at this age isn't anything remotely as scary as AP. ("ain't no ballpark neither. that #### ain't even the same sport.")
McCarthy mentioned that playing against Webb will help against Kaep (Link)...but I'm sure (or at least I hope) they understand that although they are both mobile, Kaep can actually throw the ball. Hopefully they don't get a false sense of confidence in the scheme they used against the Vikes because that won't work against the Niners.
I love this...I post about the topic just fine until those I mention get personal and sling crap...yet its "me" that ruins the threads?Open your eyes just once...I doubt you can be honest and admit what happened here is what has happened time and time again on this board.
How bad was it before? 24-54 is terrible.'The Westin said:
I'm fired up, 49er/Pack games are terrific. Pack fans are great to tailgate and party with 
Good thing the 49ers played Chicago earlier this year and Jason Campbell gave SF a preview of what Aaron Rodgers can do
Nice. Have a blast!
I was comparing the first half of the season against the second half of the season instead of using just one game as my sample size.'5Rings said:How bad was it before? 24-54 is terrible.'The Westin said:
Only Gore and ADP rushed for over 100 yards against them in a game.So, while their average per game is high...its skewed highly by how ineffective they were agaisnt ADP in those 2 games.But obviously, Gore gouged them for yards the first time too so it is a concern.
Completely agree.
Not really the same thing, also you left out the most important part when you quoted me. until he let go of the ballRunning QBs are very different from pocket passers and the Packers have been burned by them in the past. I hope that the view of what Webb can do with his feet keeps the Packers dilgent to not get out of position and let Kaep run for 50-100 yards.'5Rings said:Good thing the 49ers played Chicago earlier this year and Jason Campbell gave SF a preview of what Aaron Rodgers can do
Aldon smith has zero sacks in the last 3 games without his brother. Justin will be one armed vs gb...so we'll see
Aldon Smith without Justin is like Dana Stubbefield without Bryant Young.
Yea this seems about right. It's going to make a world of difference if Justin Smith isn't full-go. Aldon has had much less impact when Smith is out.I have to disagree with the coaching strategy of playing only 12 guys virtually all year (the 49ers DEF doesn't substitute much). This is almost the opposite of what the Packers have done, with developing talent throughout the defense and substituting as needed. That kind of depth can be game-changing come playoff time. It's still going to be a brutally difficult game for the Pack, but that could be one decent advantage - depth. I don't buy that the 49ers have had more injuries (see Bishop, DJ Smith, Perry, Worthy... all done for the year, and that's only defensively). The Packers have just handled theirs better.and Im a 49er fan
Cool, I'd love to see that. Would you mind sharing?I was comparing the first half of the season against the second half of the season instead of using just one game as my sample size.'5Rings said:How bad was it before? 24-54 is terrible.'The Westin said:
This is good
Without looking it up...they did show the stat during the game Saturday.It was something like 85-90 yards per game earlier in the year...and around 120 per game in the latter part of the year.Cool, I'd love to see that. Would you mind sharing?I was comparing the first half of the season against the second half of the season instead of using just one game as my sample size.'5Rings said:How bad was it before? 24-54 is terrible.'The Westin said:
I honestly thought you guys were about 50ypg. Should be a big Dime as the base this week, and I'm hoping we keep both Bowman and PWilly on the field this time. I can't see Vic Fangio worried about Grant or Harris.Without looking it up...they did show the stat during the game Saturday.It was something like 85-90 yards per game earlier in the year...and around 120 per game in the latter part of the year.Cool, I'd love to see that. Would you mind sharing?I was comparing the first half of the season against the second half of the season instead of using just one game as my sample size.'5Rings said:How bad was it before? 24-54 is terrible.'The Westin said:
Good point. Wonder how many missed field goals this game will have.
Who's K'ing for SF? Thought they signed Cundiff
Crosby seems to have figured out what was causing the ball to go sideways off his foot for the majority of the season.
My linkCompetition is still on-going. Just my 2cents, but I think they'll be sticking with Akers for this weekend. Akers has very close ties with the Harbaugh family, so I'm sure that will have a factor in the decision (if they are both performing well in practice).Who's K'ing for SF? Thought they signed Cundiff
Seriously? Talking about game #1 with replacement refs?Both teams are vastly different at this point in the season.'Ghost Rider said:
I've read a lot of jurb's posts, and find his posts solid. I don't play FF, so I dunno how jurb's 'ownership' in Dynasty with Smith as QB works out without Vernon Davis, but what is worth the peek at jurb's post is the idea with Alex Smith and Moss. I'll fast forward to my armchair thoughts that isn't FF related, during the pre-season.First, my thoughts to that lucky dude who will be at this game:
Is that WR a big enough name for ya, Drummer? The guy is 35 and can still run a sub 4.4 40... And he is Randy freaking Moss!
Now there lies the kicker. I think that Moss still has the phenomenal skillset that can make, even at his age, some great production within a great scheme and a structure with the balance of a run game and a QB who can at the pre-snap read pick apart an offense with some real good weapons around him. Moss had only one HUGE play this year using his wheels for a long score with a Smith short pass that was almost a dumpoff against AZ (or BUF), so the 'Big Play" Moss is still available. Of course it was against a team that had pretty much gave up on defense that game. He might have older legs, but those legs combined with his mind can still make an epic play. Moss is the extra gear you almost never use in the Harbaugh offense, but you still have that gear in the engine. Back to my earlier thoughts, my first early take on Moss and the 49ers:
I wound up over estimating Moss' targets IIRC that game, but the general idea of Moss within this offense was close. But let's look at the numbers with the "Smith offense" (which is key) here to the "Kaep offense": In nine games with Smith, Moss had 14 receptions. I'm not counting TDs yet here, just receptions. In the seven games he played with Kaep as starter, he has 13. Now, this does not include the stats from Vernon Davis, Delanie Walker, Mario Manningham, or the huge gains in Michael Crabtree's game since the QB switch. This also does not include the gains or losses by injury, or field position due to special teams, road games, or time of season. The numbers don't even reflect the offense itself. What the numbers show is the paucity of times Moss has been thrown to. Yet the difference within these numbers is who, how, how long the yards of pass attempt, etc. I've yet to go into the numbers of yardage passed of throws over a certain amount at a given time, but anybody who watches a 49er game would see that Kaep throws deeper to Moss than Smith did.
After the way GB dominated a running QB this past weekend I don't think that is very likely. Any team is at maximum advantage when the run/pass split is 50%. On the year, SF is 497/492 for pass/run. SF can do still do both very well with Kaep I expect their ratio to be near 50% for this game as well.
I'd debate it was a RB or WR attempting to play QB.
It's easy to defend a running QB when you dont have to worry at all about his passing ability.
I like your thinking here, and I hope you're right.But each of the past 16 weeks I've said to myself: "Maybe this will be the week when they finally unveal their secret weapon" in Moss, and it's never happened.This game makes me nervous. And I still think it's about Justin Smith's health. Without him healthy, then absolutely we need big from Randy.'drummer said:
I will be 24 rows up at the 30 
