I think the Giants win, I dont think it will be a high scoring game tho.Honestly, I don't have a good feeling about this one.
I'm not aware of any reason Carter wouldn't play. As of now, Taylor is a GTD.The Redskins kept 6 DEs on their roster. Should be interesting to see what kind of packages they throw out there. I think they could try to duplicate what the Giants did last year and throw out 4 DE on a 3rd and long.Any word on whether A. Carter and J. Taylor for the redskins are going to play?
There hasn't been much, if any, talk of it in the DC media. For now, I'd assume he's good to go.CBSSportsline lists him with a calf injury and questionable for week 1![]()
Honestly, I don't have a good feeling about this one.
I'm not aware of any reason Carter wouldn't play. As of now, Taylor is a GTD.The Redskins kept 6 DEs on their roster. Should be interesting to see what kind of packages they throw out there. I think they could try to duplicate what the Giants did last year and throw out 4 DE on a 3rd and long.Any word on whether A. Carter and J. Taylor for the redskins are going to play?
Ok, good news, thanks!dgreen said:There hasn't been much, if any, talk of it in the DC media. For now, I'd assume he's good to go.bucsbaby said:CBSSportsline lists him with a calf injury and questionable for week 1![]()
As a Skins fan and Portis owner,The Redskins better run the ball 35-40 times in this game
Assuming Carney kicks, the Giants kickers are a combined 86 years old!Reporting and ready for the season!!!![]()
I have been looking forward to seeing the Giants pass rush and it is a real shame about Osi. The Giants did have good depth there, but losing Strahan and Osi is a big blow.
I think the Giants are more solid than people think (many saying last year was a fluke). However, when you can pressure the QB and you can run the ball and are effective at everything else, you can be tough. Feagles is a great punter, the return game is good, RB and WR depth is good, Eli is solid and above average, the OL can run block well and the Tackles on defense have looked great this off season.
The FG kicking game is an issue, but the rest is all at least average (including a secondary that was a weak link last year)
Anything can happen opening week, but I like the Giants because I think they are a better all around team.
Oof. Missing both those guys would be the suxor.X-rays of Shawn Springs' leg (which swelled after he was kicked in practice Monday) were negative and the team said he has a bruised calf. He's likely to be a game-time decision Thursday, a la Jason Taylor.
I agree that the tendency among most people is to underestimate the Giants, but it also seems like Giants fans are being a little too dismissive of the effects of the loss of Strahan and Osi on the pass rush, particularly on 3rd downs when their line loaded up on DE's. I don't get that, and I say that as someone who has a huge amount of respect for what those guys brought to the pass rush. Won't this be a problem? Is Tuck going to be just as good this year as THE main pass rusher despite not having those other guys to take attention away from him?Reporting and ready for the season!!!![]()
I have been looking forward to seeing the Giants pass rush and it is a real shame about Osi. The Giants did have good depth there, but losing Strahan and Osi is a big blow.
I think the Giants are more solid than people think (many saying last year was a fluke). However, when you can pressure the QB and you can run the ball and are effective at everything else, you can be tough. Feagles is a great punter, the return game is good, RB and WR depth is good, Eli is solid and above average, the OL can run block well and the Tackles on defense have looked great this off season.
The FG kicking game is an issue, but the rest is all at least average (including a secondary that was a weak link last year)
Anything can happen opening week, but I like the Giants because I think they are a better all around team.
Relevant how... as Todd Collins lead the Skins to victory?buster c said:Maybe we should research what happened the last time these two teams got together in the NJ swamp:
http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter?game_id=2941...&week=REG15
. . . against a defense with Osi and Strahan . . . Yep, pretty irrelevant.Relevant how... as Todd Collins lead the Skins to victory?buster c said:Maybe we should research what happened the last time these two teams got together in the NJ swamp:
http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter?game_id=2941...&week=REG15![]()
Good point.So the Skins were clearly better then the Giants last year.. . . against a defense with Osi and Strahan . . . Yep, pretty irrelevant.Relevant how... as Todd Collins lead the Skins to victory?buster c said:Maybe we should research what happened the last time these two teams got together in the NJ swamp:
http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter?game_id=2941...&week=REG15![]()
Is kickoff really 7pm ET or is that when all the pregame crap starts? Being on the best coast, I can't imagine it's a 4pm PT kickoff? Makes no sense for the network. They'd be getting the worst of both worlds with coastal viewing ...AmpLee said:I think it should be a good game. I just hate they are starting the game at 7PM
It is 7pm - because of the Republican convention.Is kickoff really 7pm ET or is that when all the pregame crap starts? Being on the best coast, I can't imagine it's a 4pm PT kickoff? Makes no sense for the network. They'd be getting the worst of both worlds with coastal viewing ...AmpLee said:I think it should be a good game. I just hate they are starting the game at 7PM
:whoosh:WAS 0NYG 98
Well, the Giants D was pillaged in last year's opener by Dallas, true, but they were just a little bit better than that at the end of the year, no? Just a little? Don't expect weather to be a factor - Hannah remnants aren't supposed to make it to DC until Saturday, so nothing there.I'm picking a low score for the following reasons:1. Defenses are usually a little ahead of offenses early in the year.2. Giants D took some hits, but I think the Skins having a brand new offense that they've looked erratic at best in more than offsets that3. I think the Giants D will have something to prove - "Look, we're good even without Michael and Osi"4. Skins D is solid, and I'm still not sold on Eli. 5. Division game, should stay close, be very intense.6. I really don't buy all the preseason "fluff" on either QB. Campbell still looks slow to deliver the ball at times, and I still don't think he's all that comfortable in this offense. And I think Eli's a slightly above-average QB who got hot at the right time last year.*shrug* But I'm not exactly John Madden, either.As i read this thread, I see a lot of people expecting a relatively low scoring game. Why is this exactly?Is it that you think these defenses are that good? Are the offenses just not that good? Are you expecting hurricane Hannah to be effecting the area?The Giants Defnse is worse than last year, which gave up a ton of points in last season's opener to Dallas.I've heard all the preseason hype about how Campbell's supposed to have improved so much this offseason in Zorn's offense and how the Eli we saw in post season is the guy we should be expecting to see in the future. Now it's time to see if it's true or preseason fluff.
I need to know what this is.yesitsme said:As far as the Giants offense, it looks like ### systems go. They will have everyone available to them that they'll be able to count on this season in major roles. How do they not score?
Classy.As a Redskin fan I have to say that the most satisfying game of all to watch last year was the Super Bowl. Hats off one more time to the Giants for beating the "unbeatable" team.![]()
Boom! Great analysis.Well, the Giants D was pillaged in last year's opener by Dallas, true, but they were just a little bit better than that at the end of the year, no? Just a little? Don't expect weather to be a factor - Hannah remnants aren't supposed to make it to DC until Saturday, so nothing there.I'm picking a low score for the following reasons:1. Defenses are usually a little ahead of offenses early in the year.2. Giants D took some hits, but I think the Skins having a brand new offense that they've looked erratic at best in more than offsets that3. I think the Giants D will have something to prove - "Look, we're good even without Michael and Osi"4. Skins D is solid, and I'm still not sold on Eli. 5. Division game, should stay close, be very intense.6. I really don't buy all the preseason "fluff" on either QB. Campbell still looks slow to deliver the ball at times, and I still don't think he's all that comfortable in this offense. And I think Eli's a slightly above-average QB who got hot at the right time last year.*shrug* But I'm not exactly John Madden, either.yesitsme said:As i read this thread, I see a lot of people expecting a relatively low scoring game. Why is this exactly?Is it that you think these defenses are that good? Are the offenses just not that good? Are you expecting hurricane Hannah to be effecting the area?The Giants Defnse is worse than last year, which gave up a ton of points in last season's opener to Dallas.I've heard all the preseason hype about how Campbell's supposed to have improved so much this offseason in Zorn's offense and how the Eli we saw in post season is the guy we should be expecting to see in the future. Now it's time to see if it's true or preseason fluff.
Agreed. And I'm one who NEVER roots for division rivals in the playoffs, even if my team is not playing. I can't bring myself to do it. But I was rooting like hell for the Giants, and I almost enjoyed that win as much as a Redskins Super Bowl win. Almost.As a Redskin fan I have to say that the most satisfying game of all to watch last year was the Super Bowl. Hats off one more time to the Giants for beating the "unbeatable" team.![]()
So far, today is going by soooooooooooooooo slowly.
tick . . . tick . . . tick . . . tick . . . tick . . . tick . . . Me staring at clock ----------------->So far, today is going by soooooooooooooooo slowly.![]()
I am looking forward to seeing that also. Also interested to see if Campbell has a grasp of the new offense.Giants 24, Redskins 16. Should be interesting to see how Coughlin splits the carries.