Just following up on a couple loose ends I said I would address. Like I said, having
It just outside the top 5 is certainly not meant to be a slight. I love, love, love the book. There are parts of it that I think are among King's greatest achievements. At that level, it is really just a matter of everything being really good. There are probably days I would flip it with
Drawing of the Three, maybe even with
Pet Sematary. But as I was making the final decisions, there are two things that kept it just outside the top 5. First, as I have mentioned, I tend to lean more toward the larger scale stories. Not that I don't like the smaller, more personal stories (obviously
Pet Sematary is one, and I have others like
Shawshank ranked high).
The Stand concerns the fate of the the world and the
Dark Tower books the entire multiverse. Even
'Salem's Lot, while focused on a smaller footprint, feels like more of an existential threat (until the very end, I was expecting a scene of vampires ravaging Mexico).
It feels a little smaller not only because it focuses on a single town, but even within that town the evil comes and goes.
The second reason might be sacrilege to some, but among the pantheon of King antagonists, Pennywise is nowhere near my favorite. Flagg is interesting anc complicated and in the scenes from
The Stand in which you see things from his perspective, it is fascinating to see his emotional turmoil. Kurt Barlow takes an icon like Dracula and makes him feel small by being an even more terrifying representation of the same type of character. Annie Wilkes is a great villain. Greg Stillson is a great villain. Rose Hat is a great villain. But the scenes in
It that are told from the perspective of Pennywise kind of bore me. He seems like a petulant child with delusions of grandeur who is just jealous that his cosmic turtle brother is the cool one.
The other point I wanted to follow up on was the discussion about King's endings. I agree with
@Uruk-Hai that this complaint is overblown and in some ways lazy. A lot of King's books, most I would say, have great endings. I think there are a couple reasons this point gets parroted so often. First, some of his really biggest name books, like
The Stand, probably do have some of the weaker endings and people mistakenly take this is being representative of all his work. Second, while it doesn't happen as often as I think some would believe, it is undeniably true that he can from time to time invoke a deus ex machina. Though I definitely think it is lazy to look at that as invariably being a flaw. Obviously it has a negative connotation, but in the right story the deus can make a lot of sense. You could even argue that is true in
The Stand.