TobiasFunke
Footballguy
Or ... they are one play ( the blocked 29 yard FG vs. the Texans) away from being 4-1. It goes both ways. And remember, the Skins were crushing the Vick-led Eagles. Seems ridiculous to just assume that if he hadn't gotten hurt they would have lost. Also, Orakpo was held, blantantly, and would have sacked Romo on the last play and probably many more times but for holding. Making or missing FGs- that's part of the game. Saying they would have won a game but for a missed 53 yard FG but not accounting for the game they would have won but for a missed 29 yard FG is absurd. Bottom line, they're in every game they play and they've won more than they've lost. That's good news.They are 3 plays (The holding call on Rack in the Dallas game, the hit on Vick against Philly, and the game winning FG that DOINKED off the upright against the Pack) from being 0-5, so let's not get carried away.Most of us have been saying that a 0.500 season would be considered a success if it's achieved. I would be surprised (pleasantly) if they win any more than that. But that 4 game improvement over last season's win total won't be because there is so much more great talent on the team this year than last, and it certainly won't be entirely due to luck. It will almost certainly happen because this team is playing with purpose behind leaders everyone respects. That's an "it" factor.The Redskins are about a .500 team imo, and thats certainly better than I expected coming into the season.There is certainly some validity in saying the 'Skins are lucky to be 3-2. But my "it" factor observation really has nothing to do with the W-L record. It has everything to do with the play I see on the field, with the heart and emotion I see on the field, and with things like how the team has gotten better as the game goes on, instead of worse. I'm hard pressed to find any way to attribute those things to luck.They could get lucky and go win 10 or 11 games, they could get unlucky and only win 5 or 6 games. A 16 game season is a ridiculously small sample size, so you need to get lucky.
Last edited by a moderator:
Carried away with what? Yes, they could be 0-5 had things played out differently. They could also be 5-0 had things played out differently. Neither of those statements has anything to do with my feeling that this team has an "it" factor that has been missing for years.With arguably less talent on the field (no Haynesworth, no Portis, no Dockery, no Thomas, Trent Williams and Jamaal Brown not on the field for the game winning drive, etc.) than they've had in previous seasons, this team, that is still learning the playbook (O and D) and how to execute it as a team, won a game against a good NFC team. Everyone wants to focus on the fact that a potential game winning FG hit the upright, while ignoring the fact that it was a 53 yard attempt and was by no means a sure thing for any kicker (for even the best kickers, making a 50+ yarder is essentially a coin flip). It doesn't matter where the ball ended up, there was a decent chance it wasn't going between the uprights. And all that ignores that GB shouldn't have been in a position to have the outcome of this game rely on such a low percentage play.
And worth repeating.
Reid had this reminder
Sounds like Shanahan has sufficiently impressed upon everyone his M.O. for being tight-lipped about anything construed as strategy, or that could give opponents a strategic advantage.
. I will be sitting 50 yard line 2nd row rockin my Doug Williams jersey seated next to my brother wearing his Peyton manning Jersey
. At least one of us will leave the game happy!