Doug B
Footballguy
Yes ... 23rd-round free-for-all in 35 minutes.Is this still on?
Yes ... 23rd-round free-for-all in 35 minutes.Is this still on?
No more picks except make-ups. Everybody has until Tuesday noon EST to make up their skips (see below).
Three FFA/clusterf*k rounds will be held on Tuesday:
Round 23: noon EST/9AM PST
Round 24: 3PM EST/noon PST
Round 25: 6PM EST/3PM PST
Looks like you're good for the HOL idea ... no objections raised.Will wait on the decision for "Hall of Lame" or not before making any more picks.
RIP Dirty PskovLooks like you're good for the HOL idea ... no objections raised.Will wait on the decision for "Hall of Lame" or not before making any more picks.
Halos was in the forums late last night ... no wordRIP Dirty PskovLooks like you're good for the HOL idea ... no objections raised.Will wait on the decision for "Hall of Lame" or not before making any more picks.
Pskov was in Sunday morning, but he's barely been on FBG's forums over the last week or so. I figure at some point he'll return and offer a "sorry, guys".this is not an objection, but how good do you think the pitching will be for this team? there really aren't all that many "lame" pitchers in the HOF.Looks like you're good for the HOL idea ... no objections raised.Will wait on the decision for "Hall of Lame" or not before making any more picks.
Depends on how Bogart approaches his team selection. If he picks a bunch of HOF pitchers from the 1930s/40s/50s, those guys will get shelled in this thing, even using top seasons. For example, Lefty Grove and Warren Spahn, though real-life all-timers, are notoriously bad in WIS. Maybe the October WIS tweaks have changed things ... not sure.this is not an objection, but how good do you think the pitching will be for this team? there really aren't all that many "lame" pitchers in the HOF.Looks like you're good for the HOL idea ... no objections raised.Will wait on the decision for "Hall of Lame" or not before making any more picks.
just for the sake of HOF discussion... haven't looked at their respective WIS stats, but these are my picks:OF: Lloyd Waner - only got in due to halo effect of his deserving older brother and their cool nicknamesPotential "Hall Of Shame" lineup:
C - Rick Farrell
1B - George Kelly
2B - Bill Mazerroski
SS - Walter James Vincent "Rabbit" Maranville
3B - Travis Jackson
OF - George Davis
OF - Lou Brock
OF - Tommy McCarthy
Bench: Dave Winfield, Phil Rizzuto, Tony Lazzeri, Joe Tinker
Pitchers: Jim Bunning, Red Faber, Phil Neikro, Eppa Rixey, Red Ruffing, Herb Pennock
OF: agree on McCarthy
OF: wanted to argue for Lou Brock, but i'll pick Freddie Lindstrom instead. I know he played more at 3B, and we can put him there if you want.
SS: Maranville is an easy pick
2B: Maz or Johnny Evers
3B: if not Lindstrom, then George Kell
1B: agree on Kelly, also Frank Chance
C: Ferrell and Schalk
P: Rube Marquard, Catfish, Pennock, Jesse Haines, Red Ruffing, Eppa Rixey, Jack Chesbro
Others: Tinker, Rizzuto, Max Carey, Harry Hooper, Earle Combs, Ross Youngs, Chick Hafey, Tony Perez
Those batting squads have almost no slugging ... maybe they shouldn't be worried about having "too good" of a pitching staff.just for the sake of HOF discussion... haven't looked at their respective WIS stats, but these are my picks:OF: Lloyd Waner - only got in due to halo effect of his deserving older brother and their cool nicknamesPotential "Hall Of Shame" lineup:
C - Rick Farrell
1B - George Kelly
2B - Bill Mazerroski
SS - Walter James Vincent "Rabbit" Maranville
3B - Travis Jackson
OF - George Davis
OF - Lou Brock
OF - Tommy McCarthy
Bench: Dave Winfield, Phil Rizzuto, Tony Lazzeri, Joe Tinker
Pitchers: Jim Bunning, Red Faber, Phil Neikro, Eppa Rixey, Red Ruffing, Herb Pennock
OF: agree on McCarthy
OF: wanted to argue for Lou Brock, but i'll pick Freddie Lindstrom instead. I know he played more at 3B, and we can put him there if you want.
SS: Maranville is an easy pick
2B: Maz or Johnny Evers
3B: if not Lindstrom, then George Kell
1B: agree on Kelly, also Frank Chance
C: Ferrell and Schalk
P: Rube Marquard, Catfish, Pennock, Jesse Haines, Red Ruffing, Eppa Rixey, Jack Chesbro
Others: Tinker, Rizzuto, Max Carey, Harry Hooper, Earle Combs, Ross Youngs, Chick Hafey, Tony Perez
Can't see a problem with that.Crap, I took the wrong Donovan. Too late to change?
Original pick post changed.Can't see a problem with that.Crap, I took the wrong Donovan. Too late to change?
Waiting on REPICK reply, seems to be my unintentional shtick this go round23 - Jack Aker, RP

The HoL team will have a solid bullpen. But even cherry picking the best years of Wilhelm, Fingers, Sutter, Eck and Gossage won't be that much better than the usual WIS cookie RPs.Those batting squads have almost no slugging ... maybe they shouldn't be worried about having "too good" of a pitching staff.just for the sake of HOF discussion... haven't looked at their respective WIS stats, but these are my picks:OF: Lloyd Waner - only got in due to halo effect of his deserving older brother and their cool nicknamesPotential "Hall Of Shame" lineup:
C - Rick Farrell
1B - George Kelly
2B - Bill Mazerroski
SS - Walter James Vincent "Rabbit" Maranville
3B - Travis Jackson
OF - George Davis
OF - Lou Brock
OF - Tommy McCarthy
Bench: Dave Winfield, Phil Rizzuto, Tony Lazzeri, Joe Tinker
Pitchers: Jim Bunning, Red Faber, Phil Neikro, Eppa Rixey, Red Ruffing, Herb Pennock
OF: agree on McCarthy
OF: wanted to argue for Lou Brock, but i'll pick Freddie Lindstrom instead. I know he played more at 3B, and we can put him there if you want.
SS: Maranville is an easy pick
2B: Maz or Johnny Evers
3B: if not Lindstrom, then George Kell
1B: agree on Kelly, also Frank Chance
C: Ferrell and Schalk
P: Rube Marquard, Catfish, Pennock, Jesse Haines, Red Ruffing, Eppa Rixey, Jack Chesbro
Others: Tinker, Rizzuto, Max Carey, Harry Hooper, Earle Combs, Ross Youngs, Chick Hafey, Tony Perez
i don't see why you'd have to pick literal relievers, as opposed to the 10-11 lamest pitchers.The HoL team will have a solid bullpen. But even cherry picking the best years of Wilhelm, Fingers, Sutter, Eck and Gossage won't be that much better than the usual WIS cookie RPs.
... might as well clear this up right now:Is the HOL team supposed to suck? Is it supposed to be a 120-loss squad?i don't see why you'd have to pick literal relievers, as opposed to the 10-11 lamest pitchers.
Even schtick teams should be semi-competitive. I don't recall Shake Zula's all-Marlins teams being walkovers.... might as well clear this up right now:Is the HOL team supposed to suck? Is it supposed to be a 120-loss squad?i don't see why you'd have to pick literal relievers, as opposed to the 10-11 lamest pitchers.
Considering that Bogart is doing the league a favor by picking up for an AWOL owner ... I think his squad should be allowed to be straight-up competitive. One big reason is that you don't want one division to have an advantage in the WC race.Even schtick teams should be semi-competitive. I don't recall Shake Zula's all-Marlins teams being walkovers.... might as well clear this up right now:Is the HOL team supposed to suck? Is it supposed to be a 120-loss squad?i don't see why you'd have to pick literal relievers, as opposed to the 10-11 lamest pitchers.
don't disagree. but i doubt that any of us is equipped to evaluate this team's strength in advance. I'm less convinced than some of you that a HoL team will be horrible. Sure, it's possible, but i also think it's possible that it could contend for the playoffs. and that's without making allowances for non-lame HOFers.edit to elaborate that i'm not suggesting a team of all catchers and shortstops playing out of position, so my earlier comment about relievers is more of a function of my long-held and firm belief that almost every solid starting pitcher could be transformed into an above average reliever.Considering that Bogart is doing the league a favor by picking up for an AWOL owner ... I think his squad should be allowed to be straight-up competitive. One big reason is that you don't want one division to have an advantage in the WC race.
if that's the case, he'll need to bump up the talent at some of those positions. For instance both Tinker and Maranville wouldn't even have been drafted in this while Ozzie would have been. Let him us Ozzie. I think he should also probably have a 1B that's something like .300/.400/.500 and 1-2 OFs with similar stats. Besides that I think he'd be sort of competitve anyway since a lot of our teams are kind of meh anyways.Considering that Bogart is doing the league a favor by picking up for an AWOL owner ... I think his squad should be allowed to be straight-up competitive. One big reason is that you don't want one division to have an advantage in the WC race.Even schtick teams should be semi-competitive. I don't recall Shake Zula's all-Marlins teams being walkovers.... might as well clear this up right now:Is the HOL team supposed to suck? Is it supposed to be a 120-loss squad?i don't see why you'd have to pick literal relievers, as opposed to the 10-11 lamest pitchers.
If we use the list that's been produced, I have a hard time believing a truly HoL would be that competitive. Tinker is so off the charts bad in WIS that its not even funny and Mazeorski isn't much better. Its really tough to be competitive in a WIS league with one much less two OBP killers and that's only the first two positions I looked at. Chance is at best a replacement level 1B and Brock is just horrible. Put it this way, a truly HoL would be a 100 loss team.don't disagree. but i doubt that any of us is equipped to evaluate this team's strength in advance. I'm less convinced than some of you that a HoL team will be horrible. Sure, it's possible, but i also think it's possible that it could contend for the playoffs. and that's without making allowances for non-lame HOFers.Considering that Bogart is doing the league a favor by picking up for an AWOL owner ... I think his squad should be allowed to be straight-up competitive. One big reason is that you don't want one division to have an advantage in the WC race.
Mmmm ... we've seen a lot of these guys in past sims. Many of them just have terrible histories of underperfomance in this thing.Now, with the recent October WIS updates, maybe some things have changed. But I'm betting that basic batting performance won't be that different. Most of the tweaks involved fielding.... but i doubt that any of us is equipped to evaluate this team's strength in advance ...
Except for round 23sorry guys, work kicking my asssis the OP updated?will make up my picks now
you are allowed to post draft. :(Are we allowed to predraft for the free for alls? I'll be pretty busy this afternoon.
I have 10 pitchers and 1921 innings but 333 are from **** Rudolph who is mop-up and really spotty starter. Might add one more, not sure.I am debating going with only 10 pitchers. Have almost 1600 innings and a lot if flexibility... Low inning starters, starters who can relieve etc.
I'm @ 10 with 1570 innings, might go one more, still debatingI have 10 pitchers and 1921 innings but 333 are from **** Rudolph who is mop-up and really spotty starter. Might add one more, not sure.I am debating going with only 10 pitchers. Have almost 1600 innings and a lot if flexibility... Low inning starters, starters who can relieve etc.