Just like being a Detroit Lions fan. :(I'm conflicted. As a lifelong long Brewer fan and never seeing them in the playoffs I love the fact that an underdog can do this well. It gives me some hope for the future. On the other hand I HATE the fact that almost every team has celebrated at some point like that in the last 10 years and all I do is hope that the Brewers finish .500.
The NL Central is nuts, but this year's Reds, if anyone, should give you a little hope.I'm conflicted. As a lifelong long Brewer fan and never seeing them in the playoffs I love the fact that an underdog can do this well. It gives me some hope for the future. On the other hand I HATE the fact that almost every team has celebrated at some point like that in the last 10 years and all I do is hope that the Brewers finish .500.
Go back to 2001 and the Pats were a 14 pt underdog in the SB with a 6th round pick QB. There is a great shot of Brady after the game holding Bledsoe and saying "Can you believe we won!!" with the expression of a 7 year old on his face.No offense to the teams like the Yankees, Patriots, or the 90's Bulls, but I love when unexpected teams act like a kid in a candy store when they win.
Exactly what I am talking about, but by year three, it wasn't the same. The spraying champagne on the fans will be a classic moment.Go back to 2001 and the Pats were a 14 pt underdog in the SB with a 6th round pick QB. There is a great shot of Brady after the game holding Bledsoe and saying "Can you believe we won!!" with the expression of a 7 year old on his face.No offense to the teams like the Yankees, Patriots, or the 90's Bulls, but I love when unexpected teams act like a kid in a candy store when they win.
His mannerism has more to do with having way too may more games to play. beating the Yanks is great, but you still have to play Oakland on Tuesday. The team will follow Jimmy attitude, hopefully all the way.I'm thinking Verlander-Rogers in Oak, with bonderman in game 3 back in the D. I think Nate gets skipped. until game 4.Will Leyland please stop downplaying this win.
Exactly. The Tigers are awesome. What a great looking team. The fallout in NY is going to be UNBELIEVABLE. I cant wait to here Francessa on Monday.....Exactly what I am talking about, but by year three, it wasn't the same. The spraying champagne on the fans will be a classic moment.Go back to 2001 and the Pats were a 14 pt underdog in the SB with a 6th round pick QB. There is a great shot of Brady after the game holding Bledsoe and saying "Can you believe we won!!" with the expression of a 7 year old on his face.No offense to the teams like the Yankees, Patriots, or the 90's Bulls, but I love when unexpected teams act like a kid in a candy store when they win.
I feel your pain.Congrats Detroit fans...
Bless you boys. I've had to drink mercilessly today, just to contain my enthusiam. 3 down, 8 to go.That post-game celebration was one of the coolest things I've seen in MLB in a long time.
He should have just spouted the truth: The better team won.found this quote on yahoo. "You kind of get tired of giving the other team credit," slumping third baseman Alex Rodriguez said. "At some point you've got to look in the mirror and say, 'I sucked."'
Hooray TiVo!Exactly. The Tigers are awesome. What a great looking team. The fallout in NY is going to be UNBELIEVABLE. I cant wait to here Francessa on Monday.....Exactly what I am talking about, but by year three, it wasn't the same. The spraying champagne on the fans will be a classic moment.Go back to 2001 and the Pats were a 14 pt underdog in the SB with a 6th round pick QB. There is a great shot of Brady after the game holding Bledsoe and saying "Can you believe we won!!" with the expression of a 7 year old on his face.No offense to the teams like the Yankees, Patriots, or the 90's Bulls, but I love when unexpected teams act like a kid in a candy store when they win.![]()
![]()
Oh how quickly they turn on their leader.Bonderman is dyslexic?
A good manager would know that and make all the lefties bat righty and vice versa. ****ing Torre.
The Tigers were the better team this series. Congrats, Tigers fans.He should have just spouted the truth: The better team won.found this quote on yahoo. "You kind of get tired of giving the other team credit," slumping third baseman Alex Rodriguez said. "At some point you've got to look in the mirror and say, 'I sucked."'
It was a joke. Seriously can you read?Oh how quickly they turn on their leader.Bonderman is dyslexic?
A good manager would know that and make all the lefties bat righty and vice versa. ****ing Torre.
Yep but most Yankee "fans" seem to say the same thing after everytime they lose in the postseason. Get's old real quick.It was a joke. Seriously can you read?Oh how quickly they turn on their leader.Bonderman is dyslexic?
A good manager would know that and make all the lefties bat righty and vice versa. ****ing Torre.
Actually, since the Yankees only won two more games in the regular season than the Tigers, and Detroit played in a more difficult division, I think it goes without saying at this point that the Tigers are the better team, not just in this series.The Tigers were the better team this series. Congrats, Tigers fans.He should have just spouted the truth: The better team won.found this quote on yahoo. "You kind of get tired of giving the other team credit," slumping third baseman Alex Rodriguez said. "At some point you've got to look in the mirror and say, 'I sucked."'
I agree. Which makes my joke particularly funny.Yep but most Yankee "fans" seem to say the same thing after everytime they lose in the postseason. Get's old real quick.It was a joke. Seriously can you read?Oh how quickly they turn on their leader.Bonderman is dyslexic?
A good manager would know that and make all the lefties bat righty and vice versa. ****ing Torre.
Over the course of the regular season, I think the Yankees were the better team. The team's schedules were nearly identical in terms of opponent's strength. (Don't forget, the Tigers IL schedule was a joke, with Milwaukee, Chicago, Pittsburgh, Houston, etc. They went 15-3 in IL play). Without factoring injuries, the Yankees regular season team still looked better than the Tigers team. If you want to include injuries, that makes the Yanks look a bit stronger. Additionally, BP projected the Yankees to win based on their superior regular season.But I don't really feel like debating this now; hats off to the Tigers, who won the series.Actually, since the Yankees only won two more games in the regular season than the Tigers, and Detroit played in a more difficult division, I think it goes without saying at this point that the Tigers are the better team, not just in this series.The Tigers were the better team this series. Congrats, Tigers fans.He should have just spouted the truth: The better team won.found this quote on yahoo.
"You kind of get tired of giving the other team credit," slumping third baseman Alex Rodriguez said. "At some point you've got to look in the mirror and say, 'I sucked."'
Having a #7 hitter that can do .300/25/90 is never a bad thing. A guy who can hit for average and power will help you anywhere in the lineup. The Yankees lost 6-0 and 8-3 the last two games. This isn't 1968. You don't win games by manufacturing runs anymore. Were they gonna squeeze out 5 or 6? In all but the late innings of a close game, the sacrifice/running game is a way to take yourself out of a big inning chasing one run. The Tigers weren't squeezing out runs, they were scoring them in bunches.I'm a big believer in the Earl Weaver philosophy. Starting pitching, starting pitching and more starting pitching, strong defense up the middle, big bats on the corners, hold your opponent to a couple runs and then crush them with a longball. That's pretty much what the 2005 White Sox were and it's what the 2006 Tigers are.Yankees aren't a team, they're a collection. I keep hearing about how they need pitching. Well sure, but so does everyone. What they need is to formulate a good baseball lineup. Having a #7 or 8 hitter that hits .300 with 25 HR and 90 RBI is counterproductive to manufacturing runs, and even my mom knows that.This year, Torre went out of his way to get a perennial choke artist (Sheffield) into the lineup when they really needed a solid contact guy who could move runners up, bunt, and go first to third (while playing an excellent LF) in Melky.
I disagree. Having a #7 hitter that puts up power numbers doesn't allow you to play for one or two runs. Yes, the Yanks lost these games by more than 5 runs each game. But if you manufacture a couple runs early, maybe their bats start pressing intsead of ours. In the playoffs, scoring first is HUGE.I can't get on board that teams only manufacture runs in 1968. The Red Sox ended the curse by doing the following: Leadoff walk, stolen base, seeing-eye single. Yes, they did a bunch of other things in that series as well but that one sequence of events saved them from being swept out by a very flawed Yankee team.If you can get up 2-0, you won't need to squeeze out 5 or 6. Putting a couple on the board early takes the pressure off the lineup to score, and then the big hits start coming.Watching this team day-in, day-out during the regular season, it is completely obvious how much of a better lineup it is when players have specific roles rather than the "Hey you Strawberry -- hit a home run!" philosophy.Spartans Rule said:Having a #7 hitter that can do .300/25/90 is never a bad thing. A guy who can hit for average and power will help you anywhere in the lineup.The Yankees lost 6-0 and 8-3 the last two games. This isn't 1968. You don't win games by manufacturing runs anymore. Were they gonna squeeze out 5 or 6? In all but the late innings of a close game, the sacrifice/running game is a way to take yourself out of a big inning chasing one run. The Tigers weren't squeezing out runs, they were scoring them in bunches.I'm a big believer in the Earl Weaver philosophy. Starting pitching, starting pitching and more starting pitching, strong defense up the middle, big bats on the corners, hold your opponent to a couple runs and then crush them with a longball. That's pretty much what the 2005 White Sox were and it's what the 2006 Tigers are.Michael Brown said:Yankees aren't a team, they're a collection. I keep hearing about how they need pitching. Well sure, but so does everyone. What they need is to formulate a good baseball lineup. Having a #7 or 8 hitter that hits .300 with 25 HR and 90 RBI is counterproductive to manufacturing runs, and even my mom knows that.This year, Torre went out of his way to get a perennial choke artist (Sheffield) into the lineup when they really needed a solid contact guy who could move runners up, bunt, and go first to third (while playing an excellent LF) in Melky.
Chuck Knoblauch is a ####### #####!Michael Brown said:It's become a morbid tradition that every year after the Yanks get eliminated from the postseason, I send this text e-mail out to the Yankee fans I know. It's from Chuck Knoblauch right after the Yanks were eliminated by Arizona in 2001. Pretty much sums up the glaring difference between those winning teams and the current one. Can you even imagine anyone from this team thinking and saying such things about their teammates on THIS club?By CHUCK KNOBLAUCH Visitors clubhouseBank One BallparkPhoenix, ArizonaNov. 4, 10:10 p.m. This wasn't the way it was supposed to end, but wewere right where we wanted to be. We had MarianoRivera on the mound with a one-run lead. You can takeit as far back as you want. If we were in springtraining and you told me we'd have Mariano Rivera onthe mound with a one-run lead and three outs to go inWorld Series Game 7, you'd have to like our chances.You take that to the bank every time. In fact, I'dtake it again tomorrow. All I've known as a Yankee until tonight is winningchampionships. Scott Brosius and I came to the Yankeesin 1998 and tonight we were just a couple outs awayfrom being 4-for-4. Four years, four championships. Weprobably won't appreciate what we've accomplisheduntil some time goes by and we look back on it and seehow special that these four years have been and thinkabout how really difficult it is to get to the WorldSeries. It's amazing, really, that we could just getto the World Series four years in a row let alonewinning three of them. It's great. We all hope it cancontinue. I hope my Yankee career doesn't end this way butthere's a pretty good chance that it will. I gave itsome thought about 20 minutes ago while I took off myuniform. It's disappointing. Sad times, I guess, butat the same time we'll walk out of here with our headshigh because we've got nothing to be ashamed about andwe almost pulled it off. Think about it from Paul O'Neill's perspective. He hada great game and he was just a few outs away fromgoing out with four championships in a row and sixrings. There's a lot of guys that never even get tothe playoffs. There are stories every year about guyswho have great careers but just never make it to thislevel. Ernie Banks and so many other great playersplay all of those years and never get to taste whatthis is like. Then there are a thousand other guys,too, who weren't great players like Banks who nevergot here. I won a World Series my rookie year in 1991. It was amiracle season but I thought it was going to be likethat every year. We just missed the next year then1993, '94, '95, '96 and '97 in Minnesota were verytough, a lot tougher because I had tasted achampionship my first year and you always want thatagain. You want that opportunity. I welcomed coming to New York. Setting aside all ofthe statistics, personal troubles, ups and downs, Iwouldn't trade places with anyone right now, evenstanding in this clubhouse where we just got beat inthe World Series. It's about winning. I came to NewYork hoping to be on a winner and I got every bit ofthat and more. You can't ask for anything else, exceptmaybe to get one more shot. If not, I'll close thisgreat chapter in my career with all of these guys andmove on. Hopefully, though, I'll get another chance. There's nothing like winning with this group ofplayers. If we'd have won tonight, we would havecelebrated like it was our first World Series. Thatspeaks to the hunger and the desire the players inthis clubhouse had to get here. Winning never gets oldor stale here. Wherever any of these guys go nextyear, including myself, we're all going to have thesame desire to get back here again. Everyone in thisclubhouse will work to get back here for the rest ofour careers. I'll wake up some day down the line and realize, ohman, I miss these guys. What a special thing we've hadtogether. One common goal bringing all of us together.It's a very unselfish group of players. Look around,Jete, he's had a storybook career up until now andhe's got a long way to go. I've had the opportunity toplay alongside him three years as a second baseman andfour years as a teammate, if it ends today. I'llappreciate that even more as time goes by. Tino, greatfirst baseman, but, more importantly, great guy. Everybody knows about the baseball stuff, but hardlyanybody knows about the day in, day out togethernessof this team. We've become a family. Everybody alwaysgot along. There were no egos getting in the way.Everybody got along and everybody had a relationshipwith everybody else on this club. That's a veryspecial thing. How do you ever recreate something likethat? That spilled out onto the field. From Joe Torreand the coaches down to the last person, everybody gotalong. You don't come across that very often. New York is a special place, the baseball capital ofthe world. The fans are great. They know the game.They're going to get on you when you're not doing yourjob. But they also get behind you. I've experiencedboth sides of it. There aren't any other fans inbaseball like the people in New York. The Yankees area great, great organization. The pinstripes. Thetradition. Yankee Stadium is really a special place. You can't top these four years, winning thesechampionships. You would be foolish to think this canhappen again but you go to spring training, whetherit's with the Yankees or somebody else, and you try tohave that drive to get back to the World Series. Weproved that the hunger is there every year and we keepgoing out every year and try to do it again. Even if I'm not with the Yankees, I'll take a littlepiece of this team, a little piece of all of theseplayers, wherever I go. I've learned something fromeveryone in this clubhouse, on and off the field.
In retrospect even considering the success of Torre, I can't believe he lasted this long. Pinella is a great manager for sure but he is grating as hell. Gonna take this team some time to adjust and I see some problems next year. Of course the team will likely look a lot different and you can bet they'll be chasing all the arms in FA possibly bumping that payroll even higher. It'll be interesting to see if they get rid of ARod and who would take him. Gotta think the Yankees will be eating some of his salary if they want him out.Torre gone, Lou Pinella in. The NY Daily News is breaking this, according to ESPN. Nice over-reaction by George.And Michael Brown's point about a 7-8 hitter who hits .300-25-90 being counterproductive to scoring runs is quite possibly the most inane thing yet in this thread, and there has been a lot of inane #### in here.
A-Rod looks in mirror after Yankees' loss: 'I sucked'
The Evil Empire must die tonite, once and for all. I declare it so.
This is true.............Now we know.Gag, cough, gag, cough ackkkkif you didn't know........NOW YOU KNOW![]()
It's not insane. And it's not counterproductive to scoring runs in general; but rather, scoring runs in the postseason.The Yankees have become a team that sits around and waits for the 3-run HR. A nice idea in theory if people actually hit them, but when they don't, you have NO chance of winning the game because the guys still in the lineup don't know HOW to produce runs. And in the postseason, you don't often get by with the longball alone. Yes, they are important (which I'd know seeing the Yankees hit so many dramatic ones over the years), but you have to be able to score other ways. Sure, Leyritz's HR in '96 was amazing and dramatic. But they had to scratch out 3 runs to get it to 6-3 first. Someone above mentioned how the Sox didn't win using small ball. That wasn't my point. I realize that once they got back into it, they slugged the Yanks out of the yard. But my point is that they ALSO had an alternative method of scoring runs. There would never have been an Ortiz or Bellhorn or Damon HR if they couldn't manufacture that run of Mo. The Yankee lineup, when filled with these stud hitters, doesn't have that ability to produce a run when they need to.You get a leadoff double from Matsui let's say. Ok, now who's gonna sacrifice or hit a ground ball to the right side to get him to 3B with less than two outs? Giambi? Posada? A-Rod? These guys are former MVPs and All-Stars, capable of hitting 30 HR. You can't ask them to give up an AB, justifiably so. Yet that is what made the previous Yankee teams win. Go check the stats if you don't believe me. THe greatest team of all-time, the 98 Yankees, didn't have a 30 HR hitter on the entire roster. And the 3B they traded for in the '97 off-season was coming off a season where his numbers were 11-41-.203 over 133 games but he played stellar defense. Can you even possibly fathom the Yankees plugging a guy with those stats into their lineup now? And guess what? Scott Brosius was a WS MVP and hit one of the most dramatic HRs in the history of the postseason off Kim. Who else hit big HR for the Yanks, or even other teams in recent seasons?Tino Martinez, Jim Leyritz, Derek Jeter, Chuck Knoblauch, Scott Podsednik, Scott Spiezio, Alex Gonzalez.Are these guys the hulking sluggers of MLB? Hell no! I'm not saying to go out and intentionally acquire seemingly mediocre players, but when the thought process is to build a team full of contributors rather than collection of superstars, players tend to pick one another up and sustain rallies. When everyone on the team is an All-Star, one of two things tend to happen. A) The team sits around and waits for someone to hit a HR, B) Everyone on the team presses so hard to be "the man" that we see results like 2006, 2005, and the second half of the Boston series in 2004. Watching these games, do the Yankees not appear to be tight as hell?That said, I'm not dismissing the importance of starting pitching. That is what won the Yankees all those World Series. And I addressed that above, but I'm just saying everyone needs pitching and it should go without saying. As far as the lineup goes, however, it's an incredible lineup in-season, but it's not conducive to winning playoff baseball.Torre gone, Lou Pinella in. The NY Daily News is breaking this, according to ESPN. Nice over-reaction by George.And Michael Brown's point about a 7-8 hitter who hits .300-25-90 being counterproductive to scoring runs is quite possibly the most inane thing yet in this thread, and there has been a lot of inane #### in here.
Just like most Yankee fans HATED when they hired Torre only to see them LOVE him. Guess Yankee fans don't know as much as they think they do.I agree. Which makes my joke particularly funny.Yep but most Yankee "fans" seem to say the same thing after everytime they lose in the postseason. Get's old real quick.It was a joke. Seriously can you read?Oh how quickly they turn on their leader.Bonderman is dyslexic?
A good manager would know that and make all the lefties bat righty and vice versa. ****ing Torre.