What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Organizational Philosophy 101: NFC East (1 Viewer)

Ministry of Pain

Footballguy
Football and Fantasy Football…why do some teams some organizations are able to produce a winner on the field, yet other teams year in and year out consistently seem to come up with new ways to lose and continue to be also runs in the NFL? Some of these teams have a surprise year here and there, but overall they continue to float along and simply cannot be relied on. These teams seem to rotate head coaches in and out of the organizations, they fire their GMs routinely, they are always picking high in the drafts so you would think after a few seasons they would get it turned around. They don’t though.

I like to focus on something called Organizational Philosophy. Is the ownership of the team a strong leader that will be able to not only put a winning product on the field but also create a strong inner core that will lead to lots of trips into the playoffs over the course of their leadership. I guess what I’m looking for is stability. Some owners may never be able to win a Super Bowl but they can surround themselves with the right GMs, HC, this group of people can actually take over and cover up an owner that is actually not a great leader but smart enough to bring in good leaders.

Some of you are wondering what this really has to do with fantasy football, and I understand how many folks can’t see the relation between what I am referring to and Randy Moss going off for 1500 yards and 20 TD in a season

Everyone gets so hot for certain players coming out of college that sometimes we really need to take a step back and look at the overall situation that they are entering and what impact that will have not just the 1st season but down the road as well. When looking at these FA signings, what is the situation that players are going to be in…did Michael Turner’s new home really sit well with everyone? We’ll talk about that later on but I am going to systematically try and dissect all 32 NFL teams and showcase what I feel is the “Organizational Philosophy” for each team. Why would I do this? Well when I talk to folks in the different dynasty leagues and some of the board experts on college prospects, most of the time I am not real interested in the hype until I see the team that drafts the player. If Darren McFadden for example were drafted by the Miami Dolphins, and because they already have Ronnie Brown and a decent but not stellar OL, that situation would probably not make me want to jump on McFadden with the 1.01 in dynasty drafts this season. On the other hand if Rice from Rutgers were drafted by Seattle after they presumably cut Shaun Alexander, that would be a situation I would like a lot better from top to bottom. So let’s break this down division by division and see where this ends up.

NFC East

Dallas Cowboys: The Cowboys are a team that most owners should feel great about if they own any of the offensive weapons in Big D. This is an organization that is not afraid to spend money and not only keep great players but also go out and sign the big free agents if they think it will help them win. Does Jerry Jones get too much involved? Very possible in the alte 90s and early 2000s but as of late he seems more about writing the checks and hiring trustworthy people to take care of things.

You look at the Cowboys thru the years and they have great RBs like Tony Dorsett, Emmitt Smith, and a very promising Marion Barber, is he the next great Dallas RB? Certainly history within this organization shows that RB can shine big time in Dallas.

They went from Staubach to White to Aikman to now Tony Romo.

From Drew Pearson and Tony Hill, next came Michael Irvin, now they have Terrell Owens. At TE they went from Crosbie to Novacek to now Jason Witten, perhaps the best pass catching TE they have ever had.

Dallas is a team rich in tradition, they have 5 Lombardi Trophies. Do trophies add up to fantasy football success? Perhaps not immediately but it does speak to the organization and what they are trying to accomplish.

The coaches in place are solid and it looks the offensive scheme is here to stay as Jason Garrett, the OC, is almost a lock to succeed Wade Phillips when he decides he has had enough fun in Dallas. I would rate the QB, WR1, TE, and RB in Dallas as premium positions right now. Even the WR2 slot seems to produce a lot of points on any given week. I also feel that Owens is likely the biggest piece of that puzzle and if he is not healthy the foundation here in Dallas could fall apart although not disband completely. What is the shelf life of TO at this point? I am pretty sure that because he takes such care of his body that he could likely play into his late 30s but over the next year or two he will start to see some slight declines in his production. Still, 80/1350/15 TD at his age is just incredible…Owens will be 35 in December.

Is there room for a rookie to come into this organization and make a big splash in ’08? I’m not too sure about that. No WR is going to start immediately, likely a WR3 at best. TE and QB are locked down for the foreseeable future, and the RB spot is a little shaky but based on how they use the position currently, MB III is a great match for that system. I guess a rookie RB could make waves but I think it would likely take a key injury from MB III for that player to have any meaningful reps and production this season.

New York Giants: One of the worst teams ever to win a Super Bowl but it doesn’t matter and they now sit with 3 Lombardi Trophies in their case, good for them. I certainly was rooting for them in the Super Bowl so I don’t have any hate for the Giants. I will say this though, after they win these Super Bowls, the organization in my opinion does not put a great emphasis on getting back there. I have not seen them make a lot of noise in free agency, and even though they won the SB last year, this team is not all that Super when you look at it from top to bottom.

The good news is Eli Manning is only going to get better. He took command of the offense down the stretch and there was never a doubt who the leader of this offense was in the playoffs. Those are good solid things you must have to showcase a productive offense. That said, it is apparent that they need to part ways with Jeremy Shockey. Even a die hard Canesfan like myself can see that he is disruptive to the chemistry of that team. They also have an upcoming TE by the name of Boss who might be a better fit even if he is less productive.

The RB situation in NY is pretty muddy to me. I was a guy that like Bradshaw and picked him up very late in a lot of dynasty drafts last season. And since there was a mess at RB with Jacobs, Droughns, and Ward, to me it wasn’t a crowded backfield but one in transition which made it a decent place for Bradshaw who had a checkered past in college, to land. Tiki retired and to me if you are going to look at a back that can run and catch, Bradshaw is really the only back on the team who is capable of hurting teams both ways. Do I think he will be the starter this year? Probably not, but I do think he will get more and more playing time. Ward looked great when he was on the field but I do believe this will be a 2 horse show with Jacobs and Bradshaw. It won them a Super Bowl so I doubt they make a lot of changes there.

At WR, the only mystery to me is if Steve Smith will overtake Toomer this season(not likely) or next season(more likely).

The coaching staff has been given longer contracts and although I am never a fan of Coughlin and his offense, I do give him his just due for winning the Super Bowl. I don’t think the Giants players are a real premium, but certainly not lower shelf either. Plaxico Burress to me has the most value but I still am never sure what is going on in his head. Eli Manning should continue to be a solid FF QB but he is going to have to do better than 3300/23 TD before he is really an elite guy.

Philadelphia Eagles: I’ll break this down by position and of course Andy Reid’s coaching philosophy which almost supercedes the organizational philosophy.

QB: A long history of pretty good QBs, some of the elite. Ron Jaworski, Randall Cunningham, and now Donovan Mcnabb. The Eagles have done a good job thru the years of getting great QBs but keeping them healthy has always been a problem. Jaws got old quick, RC had some season ending injuries, now McNabb follow a lot in those same footprints. As a FF owner, I love it when McNabb is rolling as he can be a top3 FF Qb for periods of time, but rarely over the full season. Would make me leery to have a Philly starting QB as my cornerstone in Dynasty.

WR: Nothing there right now is Canton material, that’s for sure. They had TO but couldn’t keep him happy. But Philly has had some great WR like Carmichael, Chris Carter played there, Irving Fryar passed thru, they just can’t seem to find that 10 year starting WR for them although Carmichael was all that back in the day.

TE: Very up and down. LJ Smith seemed to get hurt as of late, they have had some big names at TE including Keith Jackson but they also are a team that ahs a hard time holding onto players. They are always letting big names leave, not just on offense either.

RB: Westbrook had his career year last season with 2,000 total yards and 12 TD…sell high owners, sell high!!! Has anyone gone into the HoF that was a Philly RB? I don’t actually know the answer to that but perhaps others do.

There is room for improvement at the WR spot. If they got a real stud at WR thru the draft, I could see that player immediately become the WR2 in Philly. Problem is they just have not had a lot of luck at WR thru the draft which would make me uncomfortable as a dynasty owner. I don’t see a RB pushing Westbrook to the side either.

Washington Redskins: So Snyder waits and waits, plays games with Fossil possibly being the HC in Washington, he kept pushing it back further and further, obviously he wanted someone that was coaching in the Super Bowl…he got none of those candidates and ended up making Jim Zorn the next HC in Washington? This team has terrible organizational philosophy and it starts with Snyder. I know I am going to get a lot of heat form Skinsfans but I don’t really care, I have to call them like I seem them.

The Joe Gibbs experiment really didn’t go anywhere. We thought that bringing in the offensive guru in KC would make Washington a FF bonanza and it wasn’t. Look at the positions one by one.

QB: Regardless of what you think Jason Campbell will become the fact is he is a longshot to be an elite QB in the NFL IMO. I know guys are hot for JC and that he has had some success, Skinsfans really like to defend him because he is so young…but seriously, where does Jason Campbell stack up with the other 31 starting NFL QBs…I’m not going to put him in a box but I would not put him in the top half by a long shot. And you look at the 3 previous teams we are talking about and those teams all have pretty solid QBs entrenched in the starting role. Campbell isn’t even the best QB in his division..maybe 4th actually so how can anyone try and act like he is the next great thing? I am hammering on this because it has a ripple effect on the other key positions.

WR: Santana Moss has avg about 60 catches, 800 yards and about 4-5 TD the past 2 seasons…those are facts folks, I don’t make this stuff up. Is he a good buy low candidate? Maybe but what in Washington gives you the go ahead to want to get into bed with any of their starting players? We know nothing about what Zorn is going to go with, and quite frankly it would frighten me as a dynasty owner and does since I own Moss in a couple of leagues.

TE: Cooley is solid but again I wonder what the plan for him will be in the new offense.

RB: Portis has been so up and down, very underwhelming to me most of last season…he was in the top half of starting RB but he didn’t carry anyone to a championship, please! The guy avg under 4 ypc for the 2nd time since being in Washington. I think if you have an owner that is hot for Portis that you should sell big time. He will be entering his 7th season in 2008 so the mileage is adding up with this guy.

This is one of those teams that I would not be excited about if they took a RB high in the draft, or a WR…I think Washington in general is in disarray and I don not ee them as a team on the rise. Sorry to the Skinsfans but I just don’t see a lot of upside right now with their offensive stars.

I really wanted to do these threads in the off season when the real NFL fans are patrolling on these boards. Please don't be afraid to speak out, a lot of what you just read could be dead wrong. But let's try and learn form each other and stay away from a lot of put downs and 1 ups, they don't get us anywhere in these threads. I am looking forward to putting up the other 28 teams but it will be over a period of time as I cannot get these threads out as quick as I used to. Enjoy!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Football and Fantasy Football…why do some teams some organizations are able to produce a winner on the field, yet other teams year in and year out consistently seem to come up with new ways to lose and continue to be also runs in the NFL? Some of these teams have a surprise year here and there, but overall they continue to float along and simply cannot be relied on. These teams seem to rotate head coaches in and out of the organizations, they fire their GMs routinely, they are always picking high in the drafts so you would think after a few seasons they would get it turned around. They don’t though.

I like to focus on something called Organizational Philosophy. Is the ownership of the team a strong leader that will be able to not only put a winning product on the field but also create a strong inner core that will lead to lots of trips into the playoffs over the course of their leadership. I guess what I’m looking for is stability. Some owners may never be able to win a Super Bowl but they can surround themselves with the right GMs, HC, this group of people can actually take over and cover up an owner that is actually not a great leader but smart enough to bring in good leaders.

Some of you are wondering what this really has to do with fantasy football, and I understand how many folks can’t see the relation between what I am referring to and Randy Moss going off for 1500 yards and 20 TD in a season

Everyone gets so hot for certain players coming out of college that sometimes we really need to take a step back and look at the overall situation that they are entering and what impact that will have not just the 1st season but down the road as well. When looking at these FA signings, what is the situation that players are going to be in…did Michael Turner’s new home really sit well with everyone? We’ll talk about that later on but I am going to systematically try and dissect all 32 NFL teams and showcase what I feel is the “Organizational Philosophy” for each team. Why would I do this? Well when I talk to folks in the different dynasty leagues and some of the board experts on college prospects, most of the time I am not real interested in the hype until I see the team that drafts the player. If Darren McFadden for example were drafted by the Miami Dolphins, and because they already have Ronnie Brown and a decent but not stellar OL, that situation would probably not make me want to jump on McFadden with the 1.01 in dynasty drafts this season. On the other hand if Rice from Rutgers were drafted by Seattle after they presumably cut Shaun Alexander, that would be a situation I would like a lot better from top to bottom. So let’s break this down division by division and see where this ends up.

NFC East

Philadelphia Eagles: I’ll break this down by position and of course Andy Reid’s coaching philosophy which almost supercedes the organizational philosophy.

QB: A long history of pretty good QBs, some of the elite. Ron Jaworski, Randall Cunningham, and now Donovan Mcnabb. The Eagles have done a good job thru the years of getting great QBs but keeping them healthy has always been a problem. Jaws got old quick, RC had some season ending injuries, now McNabb follow a lot in those same footprints. As a FF owner, I love it when McNabb is rolling as he can be a top3 FF Qb for periods of time, but rarely over the full season. Would make me leery to have a Philly starting QB as my cornerstone in Dynasty.

WR: Nothing there right now is Canton material, that’s for sure. They had TO but couldn’t keep him happy. But Philly has had some great WR like Carmichael, Chris Carter played there, Irving Fryar passed thru, they just can’t seem to find that 10 year starting WR for them although Carmichael was all that back in the day.

TE: Very up and down. LJ Smith seemed to get hurt as of late, they have had some big names at TE including Keith Jackson but they also are a team that ahs a hard time holding onto players. They are always letting big names leave, not just on offense either.

RB: Westbrook had his career year last season with 2,000 total yards and 12 TD…sell high owners, sell high!!! Has anyone gone into the HoF that was a Philly RB? I don’t actually know the answer to that but perhaps others do.

There is room for improvement at the WR spot. If they got a real stud at WR thru the draft, I could see that player immediately become the WR2 in Philly. Problem is they just have not had a lot of luck at WR thru the draft which would make me uncomfortable as a dynasty owner. I don’t see a RB pushing Westbrook to the side either.
Are we only talking offensively because the Eagles for many years were carried by their defense. Even during the McNabb Era, defense was the key.Defensively guys like: Reggie White, Eric Allen, Jerome Brown, Clyde Simmons, Brian Dawkins were all awesome.

Also, at WR: Mike Quick was pretty darn good, albeit for a short time. And the closest thing to a HOF RB the Eagles have had is probably Ricky Watters for a brief time. Whether he gets into the HOF is debateable.

 
Fasincating that you go back far enough to talk about all five championships with the Cowboys, and imply that Jones' management is just a continuation of the Cowboys' long tradition, and yet your treatment of the Redskins goes back only 8 years.

You hate Snyder. Fine. Don't pretend that your treatment is about much more than getting to that punchline.

 
Fasincating that you go back far enough to talk about all five championships with the Cowboys, and imply that Jones' management is just a continuation of the Cowboys' long tradition, and yet your treatment of the Redskins goes back only 8 years. You hate Snyder. Fine. Don't pretend that your treatment is about much more than getting to that punchline.
I knew you would post quickly Redman. You're right that I should have highlighted the 3 SB Championships that the Skins won but 2 of them were strike shortened seasons just for the record.You didn't offer anything to defend Snyder, and I don't hate him at all but he is not an owner that i put much faith or stock in. Where do you see the Skins right now and where is your comfort level as a FF owner?What you posted was mostly an attack on me, i would rather stick to the facts and keep it on that level, I wasn't going for punchlines, and your better than that.
 
Football and Fantasy Football…why do some teams some organizations are able to produce a winner on the field, yet other teams year in and year out consistently seem to come up with new ways to lose and continue to be also runs in the NFL? Some of these teams have a surprise year here and there, but overall they continue to float along and simply cannot be relied on. These teams seem to rotate head coaches in and out of the organizations, they fire their GMs routinely, they are always picking high in the drafts so you would think after a few seasons they would get it turned around. They don’t though.

I like to focus on something called Organizational Philosophy. Is the ownership of the team a strong leader that will be able to not only put a winning product on the field but also create a strong inner core that will lead to lots of trips into the playoffs over the course of their leadership. I guess what I’m looking for is stability. Some owners may never be able to win a Super Bowl but they can surround themselves with the right GMs, HC, this group of people can actually take over and cover up an owner that is actually not a great leader but smart enough to bring in good leaders.

Some of you are wondering what this really has to do with fantasy football, and I understand how many folks can’t see the relation between what I am referring to and Randy Moss going off for 1500 yards and 20 TD in a season

Everyone gets so hot for certain players coming out of college that sometimes we really need to take a step back and look at the overall situation that they are entering and what impact that will have not just the 1st season but down the road as well. When looking at these FA signings, what is the situation that players are going to be in…did Michael Turner’s new home really sit well with everyone? We’ll talk about that later on but I am going to systematically try and dissect all 32 NFL teams and showcase what I feel is the “Organizational Philosophy” for each team. Why would I do this? Well when I talk to folks in the different dynasty leagues and some of the board experts on college prospects, most of the time I am not real interested in the hype until I see the team that drafts the player. If Darren McFadden for example were drafted by the Miami Dolphins, and because they already have Ronnie Brown and a decent but not stellar OL, that situation would probably not make me want to jump on McFadden with the 1.01 in dynasty drafts this season. On the other hand if Rice from Rutgers were drafted by Seattle after they presumably cut Shaun Alexander, that would be a situation I would like a lot better from top to bottom. So let’s break this down division by division and see where this ends up.

NFC East

Philadelphia Eagles: I’ll break this down by position and of course Andy Reid’s coaching philosophy which almost supercedes the organizational philosophy.

QB: A long history of pretty good QBs, some of the elite. Ron Jaworski, Randall Cunningham, and now Donovan Mcnabb. The Eagles have done a good job thru the years of getting great QBs but keeping them healthy has always been a problem. Jaws got old quick, RC had some season ending injuries, now McNabb follow a lot in those same footprints. As a FF owner, I love it when McNabb is rolling as he can be a top3 FF Qb for periods of time, but rarely over the full season. Would make me leery to have a Philly starting QB as my cornerstone in Dynasty.

WR: Nothing there right now is Canton material, that’s for sure. They had TO but couldn’t keep him happy. But Philly has had some great WR like Carmichael, Chris Carter played there, Irving Fryar passed thru, they just can’t seem to find that 10 year starting WR for them although Carmichael was all that back in the day.

TE: Very up and down. LJ Smith seemed to get hurt as of late, they have had some big names at TE including Keith Jackson but they also are a team that ahs a hard time holding onto players. They are always letting big names leave, not just on offense either.

RB: Westbrook had his career year last season with 2,000 total yards and 12 TD…sell high owners, sell high!!! Has anyone gone into the HoF that was a Philly RB? I don’t actually know the answer to that but perhaps others do.

There is room for improvement at the WR spot. If they got a real stud at WR thru the draft, I could see that player immediately become the WR2 in Philly. Problem is they just have not had a lot of luck at WR thru the draft which would make me uncomfortable as a dynasty owner. I don’t see a RB pushing Westbrook to the side either.
Are we only talking offensively because the Eagles for many years were carried by their defense. Even during the McNabb Era, defense was the key.Defensively guys like: Reggie White, Eric Allen, Jerome Brown, Clyde Simmons, Brian Dawkins were all awesome.

Also, at WR: Mike Quick was pretty darn good, albeit for a short time. And the closest thing to a HOF RB the Eagles have had is probably Ricky Watters for a brief time. Whether he gets into the HOF is debateable.
I forgot about Watters but I don't think he will make it in. Quick was good and lived up to his name as his career was rather quick.I would love to read what people think the defenses have as far as impact on the offenses because it really does make a huge difference. Not sure the Eagles defense has been stable the past few years though as they seemed to shuffle a lot of their LB in and out of the organization. kearse didn't pan out too well for them and their DBs always seem to be in flux as they spend a lot o draft picks on them.

 
Washington Redskins: So Snyder waits and waits, plays games with Fossil possibly being the HC in Washington, he kept pushing it back further and further, obviously he wanted someone that was coaching in the Super Bowl…he got none of those candidates and ended up making Jim Zorn the next HC in Washington? This team has terrible organizational philosophy and it starts with Snyder.
You're about two months behind the times. Snyder has finally taken the leash off of Vinny Cerrato, and Cerrato has been staking out a much different position than Snyder has.
 
Washington Redskins: So Snyder waits and waits, plays games with Fossil possibly being the HC in Washington, he kept pushing it back further and further, obviously he wanted someone that was coaching in the Super Bowl…he got none of those candidates and ended up making Jim Zorn the next HC in Washington? This team has terrible organizational philosophy and it starts with Snyder.
You're about two months behind the times. Snyder has finally taken the leash off of Vinny Cerrato, and Cerrato has been staking out a much different position than Snyder has.
I don't understand the post. What does it matter that I didn't come in here when he hired Zorn and start a new thread? I am just stating what happened. Your not telling me anything about Vinny Cerrato...sounds a little Sopranos to me...what has he done so far?
 
This is a great idea, and I liked some of your analysis. However, I think it is hard to predict future success solely based on a franchise's tradition. If they have new ownership, a new GM, and a new coach, then their philosophies have certainly changed. The Eagles under Braman are a totally different animal compared to them under Lurie, and I wouldn't say anything that occurs from this point has any connection with decisions the organization made during the "Buddy" years.

 
Fasincating that you go back far enough to talk about all five championships with the Cowboys, and imply that Jones' management is just a continuation of the Cowboys' long tradition, and yet your treatment of the Redskins goes back only 8 years. You hate Snyder. Fine. Don't pretend that your treatment is about much more than getting to that punchline.
Agreed, this is a very biased post. I had to quit reading halfway through the Cowboy section because there was so much I disagreed with I didn't want to try and respond.
 
I forgot about Watters but I don't think he will make it in. Quick was good and lived up to his name as his career was rather quick.I would love to read what people think the defenses have as far as impact on the offenses because it really does make a huge difference. Not sure the Eagles defense has been stable the past few years though as they seemed to shuffle a lot of their LB in and out of the organization. kearse didn't pan out too well for them and their DBs always seem to be in flux as they spend a lot o draft picks on them.
Steve Van Buren is in the Hall of Fame. He was the most dominating RB in the game when he played. Of course that was the 1940's, but it's still a HOF running back.DBs in flux? 3 of the 4 starting secondary were the same for the last four seasons. (That will change with Samuel) They drafted a lot of DB, but they were almost all low-round picks for depth.
 
Fasincating that you go back far enough to talk about all five championships with the Cowboys, and imply that Jones' management is just a continuation of the Cowboys' long tradition, and yet your treatment of the Redskins goes back only 8 years. You hate Snyder. Fine. Don't pretend that your treatment is about much more than getting to that punchline.
Agreed, this is a very biased post. I had to quit reading halfway through the Cowboy section because there was so much I disagreed with I didn't want to try and respond.
How is it biased when i have no roothing interest in any of these 4 teams?
 
New York Giants: One of the worst teams ever to win a Super Bowl but it doesn’t matter and they now sit with 3 Lombardi Trophies in their case, good for them. I certainly was rooting for them in the Super Bowl so I don’t have any hate for the Giants. I will say this though, after they win these Super Bowls, the organization in my opinion does not put a great emphasis on getting back there. I have not seen them make a lot of noise in free agency, and even though they won the SB last year, this team is not all that Super when you look at it from top to bottom.

The good news is Eli Manning is only going to get better. He took command of the offense down the stretch and there was never a doubt who the leader of this offense was in the playoffs. Those are good solid things you must have to showcase a productive offense. That said, it is apparent that they need to part ways with Jeremy Shockey. Even a die hard Canesfan like myself can see that he is disruptive to the chemistry of that team. They also have an upcoming TE by the name of Boss who might be a better fit even if he is less productive.

The RB situation in NY is pretty muddy to me. I was a guy that like Bradshaw and picked him up very late in a lot of dynasty drafts last season. And since there was a mess at RB with Jacobs, Droughns, and Ward, to me it wasn’t a crowded backfield but one in transition which made it a decent place for Bradshaw who had a checkered past in college, to land. Tiki retired and to me if you are going to look at a back that can run and catch, Bradshaw is really the only back on the team who is capable of hurting teams both ways. Do I think he will be the starter this year? Probably not, but I do think he will get more and more playing time. Ward looked great when he was on the field but I do believe this will be a 2 horse show with Jacobs and Bradshaw. It won them a Super Bowl so I doubt they make a lot of changes there.

At WR, the only mystery to me is if Steve Smith will overtake Toomer this season(not likely) or next season(more likely).

The coaching staff has been given longer contracts and although I am never a fan of Coughlin and his offense, I do give him his just due for winning the Super Bowl. I don’t think the Giants players are a real premium, but certainly not lower shelf either. Plaxico Burress to me has the most value but I still am never sure what is going on in his head. Eli Manning should continue to be a solid FF QB but he is going to have to do better than 3300/23 TD before he is really an elite guy.
MOP, didn't much care for the beginning, little wordy but otherwise and most important(to me I guess) is I really appreciate you taking the time to write this. Thank you.Eli enters most games with an advantage in that he will get more time than his opposing QB. Credit Giants OL and DL/Spags for that. If you roll with every NFL QB has alot of ability, then to a small small degree, it almost doesn't matter how good he is just that he has significantly more time. Back in the 80s, Jim McMahon wasn't very good but he too had that advantage almost every gameday. Shaun King got the Bucs far one year and is another example.

I think Smith is causing them to work up plays this offseason. They had a slew of them for Sinorice and he's always hurt. Tim Carter was plugged into Sinorice's plays 2 years ago and he also got hurt. I don't think Smith has their blazing speed or quickness. He's got some speed, he is a WR, just not like that. A short quick pass to him will be just that, while a short quick pass to sinorice could mean some wiggle and a sorta sneaky long play. I think they'll be re-visiting the playbook for Steve. I don't think he bounces Amani out of his spot either, agree with the 09 thought.

I'm curious how Tyree will do. I'm not sure any NFL player got a bigger boost of confidence than him. I hadn't thought he was very good but stranger things have happenned and he's shown great tencaity and determination on special teams. If he's determinned to be a good NFL WR, I don't want to count him out just yet.

Most say Sinorice should be cut/injury settlement but he probably should be kept around. He can't be too expensive and his ability can easily be merged into any scheme without disrupting. Like I said previously, all he needs is a short quick pass and every O has that. At this point, he's "gravy" or extra to their offense as they've been successful without him so he might be a nice new wrinkle for DCs to have to plan for. Chances are the best he'll be is like Jermaine Lewis playing WR in Baltimore but ...the same guy that drove me nuts for "never" playing, I actually like that he's still around.

I think you'll be proven wrong on Bradshaw being the only 2 way threat. Last summer everyone was raving about Jacobs catching and running. I think Coughlin was using him with what he does best and partially holding him back due to injury. The biggest reason I say that is because he with the ball heading toward any NFL DB is a wonderful position for the Giants to be in. Everyone knows proper tackling is a lost art and well if they don't do that he'll just roll right over them. I don't think Coughlin or Gilbride can just give up trying to set that up, that easily.

I don't think Ward returns. Last I heard, he wants a several year deal and the Gmen aren't offerring it. They must replace him if so. Chris Brown or some vet looking for a small deal would suffice. Jacobs isn't injured as often as people seem to thin but still just Bradshaw wouldn't be enough IMO and Droughns is an afterthought too. They could roll with Droughns but I don't think they should.

Boss is an average talent with solid hands. Shockey has "all the talent in the world". It's easy to forget his wealth of talent since he's been hurt and kept in to block and not shown it too much the last couple years.

Boss and Bradshaw are good. Shockey and Jacobs could be great. I don't think people rooting for the underdog will get their wishes with them.

 
New York Giants: One of the worst teams ever to win a Super Bowl but it doesn’t matter and they now sit with 3 Lombardi Trophies in their case, good for them. I certainly was rooting for them in the Super Bowl so I don’t have any hate for the Giants. I will say this though, after they win these Super Bowls, the organization in my opinion does not put a great emphasis on getting back there. I have not seen them make a lot of noise in free agency, and even though they won the SB last year, this team is not all that Super when you look at it from top to bottom.

The good news is Eli Manning is only going to get better. He took command of the offense down the stretch and there was never a doubt who the leader of this offense was in the playoffs. Those are good solid things you must have to showcase a productive offense. That said, it is apparent that they need to part ways with Jeremy Shockey. Even a die hard Canesfan like myself can see that he is disruptive to the chemistry of that team. They also have an upcoming TE by the name of Boss who might be a better fit even if he is less productive.

The RB situation in NY is pretty muddy to me. I was a guy that like Bradshaw and picked him up very late in a lot of dynasty drafts last season. And since there was a mess at RB with Jacobs, Droughns, and Ward, to me it wasn’t a crowded backfield but one in transition which made it a decent place for Bradshaw who had a checkered past in college, to land. Tiki retired and to me if you are going to look at a back that can run and catch, Bradshaw is really the only back on the team who is capable of hurting teams both ways. Do I think he will be the starter this year? Probably not, but I do think he will get more and more playing time. Ward looked great when he was on the field but I do believe this will be a 2 horse show with Jacobs and Bradshaw. It won them a Super Bowl so I doubt they make a lot of changes there.

At WR, the only mystery to me is if Steve Smith will overtake Toomer this season(not likely) or next season(more likely).

The coaching staff has been given longer contracts and although I am never a fan of Coughlin and his offense, I do give him his just due for winning the Super Bowl. I don’t think the Giants players are a real premium, but certainly not lower shelf either. Plaxico Burress to me has the most value but I still am never sure what is going on in his head. Eli Manning should continue to be a solid FF QB but he is going to have to do better than 3300/23 TD before he is really an elite guy.
MOP, didn't much care for the beginning, little wordy but otherwise and most important(to me I guess) is I really appreciate you taking the time to write this. Thank you.Eli enters most games with an advantage in that he will get more time than his opposing QB. Credit Giants OL and DL/Spags for that. If you roll with every NFL QB has alot of ability, then to a small small degree, it almost doesn't matter how good he is just that he has significantly more time. Back in the 80s, Jim McMahon wasn't very good but he too had that advantage almost every gameday. Shaun King got the Bucs far one year and is another example.

I think Smith is causing them to work up plays this offseason. They had a slew of them for Sinorice and he's always hurt. Tim Carter was plugged into Sinorice's plays 2 years ago and he also got hurt. I don't think Smith has their blazing speed or quickness. He's got some speed, he is a WR, just not like that. A short quick pass to him will be just that, while a short quick pass to sinorice could mean some wiggle and a sorta sneaky long play. I think they'll be re-visiting the playbook for Steve. I don't think he bounces Amani out of his spot either, agree with the 09 thought.

I'm curious how Tyree will do. I'm not sure any NFL player got a bigger boost of confidence than him. I hadn't thought he was very good but stranger things have happenned and he's shown great tencaity and determination on special teams. If he's determinned to be a good NFL WR, I don't want to count him out just yet.

Most say Sinorice should be cut/injury settlement but he probably should be kept around. He can't be too expensive and his ability can easily be merged into any scheme without disrupting. Like I said previously, all he needs is a short quick pass and every O has that. At this point, he's "gravy" or extra to their offense as they've been successful without him so he might be a nice new wrinkle for DCs to have to plan for. Chances are the best he'll be is like Jermaine Lewis playing WR in Baltimore but ...the same guy that drove me nuts for "never" playing, I actually like that he's still around.

I think you'll be proven wrong on Bradshaw being the only 2 way threat. Last summer everyone was raving about Jacobs catching and running. I think Coughlin was using him with what he does best and partially holding him back due to injury. The biggest reason I say that is because he with the ball heading toward any NFL DB is a wonderful position for the Giants to be in. Everyone knows proper tackling is a lost art and well if they don't do that he'll just roll right over them. I don't think Coughlin or Gilbride can just give up trying to set that up, that easily.

I don't think Ward returns. Last I heard, he wants a several year deal and the Gmen aren't offerring it. They must replace him if so. Chris Brown or some vet looking for a small deal would suffice. Jacobs isn't injured as often as people seem to thin but still just Bradshaw wouldn't be enough IMO and Droughns is an afterthought too. They could roll with Droughns but I don't think they should.

Boss is an average talent with solid hands. Shockey has "all the talent in the world". It's easy to forget his wealth of talent since he's been hurt and kept in to block and not shown it too much the last couple years.

Boss and Bradshaw are good. Shockey and Jacobs could be great. I don't think people rooting for the underdog will get their wishes with them.
:gang2: Excellent post Bri, well thought out.

 
Fasincating that you go back far enough to talk about all five championships with the Cowboys, and imply that Jones' management is just a continuation of the Cowboys' long tradition, and yet your treatment of the Redskins goes back only 8 years. You hate Snyder. Fine. Don't pretend that your treatment is about much more than getting to that punchline.
Agreed, this is a very biased post. I had to quit reading halfway through the Cowboy section because there was so much I disagreed with I didn't want to try and respond.
How is it biased when i have no roothing interest in any of these 4 teams?
Because you pick and choose your facts to fit your argument. You left so many facts out your argument is invalid. Let’s just say I chose to disagree with you. It isn't important enough for me to go into a rebuttal.
 
Couple of things. You mention that the Giants haven’t done anything via free agency after winning each of their Super Bowls.

1986 – No such thing as free agency

1990 – Plan B free agency

2007 – Lost a couple of defensive starters in Mitchell & Wilson and have not replaced them. Wilson got way to much money from the Raiders to try and keep him. I am disappointed that they didn’t make a play for Briggs. Looks like they are going to go with Pierce, Kiwi and Wilkerson as the starters next year. They could use another corner but I didn't expect them to go after Samuel.

The Giants are very good where it counts the most, the offensive and defensive lines.

You mention the running game being “muddled” because the backfield is/was crowded. Maybe they don’t have the featured back that everyone in fantasy like to see, however as a team they were forth in the NFL in rushing last season. I will take 4th in rushing every year and I really don’t care how you do it or who you do it with. Jacobs and Bradshaw makes a nice combo and I can see them bringing in another vet RB or even drafting another one in this deep RB draft or both.

I don’t see them letting Shockey go, he is one of the best TE’s out there his blocking may not help his fantasy numbers but he is excellent in that part of the game. I am a little worried that Plax may want to re-do his deal.

I am not calling for a repeat but I sure don’t expect the Giants to fall off the map. As a whole they are a pretty young team (Not sure but I remember hearing 5th or 6th youngest team). Sure they have some holes to fill but Resse did a great job with his 1st draft, hopefully he can do it again.

 
Couple of things. You mention that the Giants haven’t done anything via free agency after winning each of their Super Bowls.1986 – No such thing as free agency1990 – Plan B free agency2007 – Lost a couple of defensive starters in Mitchell & Wilson and have not replaced them. Wilson got way to much money from the Raiders to try and keep him. I am disappointed that they didn’t make a play for Briggs. Looks like they are going to go with Pierce, Kiwi and Wilkerson as the starters next year. They could use another corner but I didn't expect them to go after Samuel. The Giants are very good where it counts the most, the offensive and defensive lines.You mention the running game being “muddled” because the backfield is/was crowded. Maybe they don’t have the featured back that everyone in fantasy like to see, however as a team they were forth in the NFL in rushing last season. I will take 4th in rushing every year and I really don’t care how you do it or who you do it with. Jacobs and Bradshaw makes a nice combo and I can see them bringing in another vet RB or even drafting another one in this deep RB draft or both.I don’t see them letting Shockey go, he is one of the best TE’s out there his blocking may not help his fantasy numbers but he is excellent in that part of the game. I am a little worried that Plax may want to re-do his deal. I am not calling for a repeat but I sure don’t expect the Giants to fall off the map. As a whole they are a pretty young team (Not sure but I remember hearing 5th or 6th youngest team). Sure they have some holes to fill but Resse did a great job with his 1st draft, hopefully he can do it again.
Good points, and the Giants are never usually a 1-15 or 2-14 type team, at least not in the past 20+ years I don't think. And I agree that it doesn't matter how you get the yards on the ground but it does matter to FF owners especially since we are seeing a decline in stud RB and more of a 2 back rotation on a lot of teams.
 
Fasincating that you go back far enough to talk about all five championships with the Cowboys, and imply that Jones' management is just a continuation of the Cowboys' long tradition, and yet your treatment of the Redskins goes back only 8 years. You hate Snyder. Fine. Don't pretend that your treatment is about much more than getting to that punchline.
Agreed, this is a very biased post. I had to quit reading halfway through the Cowboy section because there was so much I disagreed with I didn't want to try and respond.
How is it biased when i have no roothing interest in any of these 4 teams?
Because you pick and choose your facts to fit your argument. You left so many facts out your argument is invalid. Let’s just say I chose to disagree with you. It isn't important enough for me to go into a rebuttal.
Where is the arguement when it comes to the Washington Redskins? They have not won a Super Bowl since 1991, they have not palyed in a Super Bowl since 1991, under Snyder as owner they ahve not even come close to sniffing a Super Bowl trip. Todd Collins has been talked about as a very credible starting QB if they have to go that way...ugh! Please don't take this as "I hate the Skins"...very rare that I fire up a Washington Redskins thread as I know it only flames away at the fans, but I am not picking and choosing my facts. I would love to ehar why the Washington Redskins would be a good team to invest FF ownership in over the next 3 years becasue I don't really see it as a tight ship in DC really.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fasincating that you go back far enough to talk about all five championships with the Cowboys, and imply that Jones' management is just a continuation of the Cowboys' long tradition, and yet your treatment of the Redskins goes back only 8 years. You hate Snyder. Fine. Don't pretend that your treatment is about much more than getting to that punchline.
I'm also confused about this line of reasoning.What do Roger Staubach, Tony Dorsett, Harold Carmichael and Randall Cunningham have to do with the current organizational philosophies of the Cowboys and Eagles?
 
Fasincating that you go back far enough to talk about all five championships with the Cowboys, and imply that Jones' management is just a continuation of the Cowboys' long tradition, and yet your treatment of the Redskins goes back only 8 years. You hate Snyder. Fine. Don't pretend that your treatment is about much more than getting to that punchline.
Agreed, this is a very biased post. I had to quit reading halfway through the Cowboy section because there was so much I disagreed with I didn't want to try and respond.
How is it biased when i have no roothing interest in any of these 4 teams?
Biased enough that I can name fans from each of the Redskins rival teams on these forums that I'd view as being more objective about my team than you are.
 
Fasincating that you go back far enough to talk about all five championships with the Cowboys, and imply that Jones' management is just a continuation of the Cowboys' long tradition, and yet your treatment of the Redskins goes back only 8 years. You hate Snyder. Fine. Don't pretend that your treatment is about much more than getting to that punchline.
Agreed, this is a very biased post. I had to quit reading halfway through the Cowboy section because there was so much I disagreed with I didn't want to try and respond.
How is it biased when i have no roothing interest in any of these 4 teams?
Biased enough that I can name fans from each of the Redskins rival teams on these forums that I'd view as being more objective about my team than you are.
Again Red, there is nothing you are writing that could be viewed as anything other than a sore fan who feels like I am picking on his team. You will see as I keep releasing these threads that I am not picking on teams, just going with what they are doing presently. And I listed the teams in alphabetical order, it's not ranked 1-2-3-4 or anything although I was pretty brutal when it came to the Skins. I am not seeing anything you are writing that says that you DO NOT agree with me that Dan Snyder is pretty much up to this point been a lousy onwer or leader if you will. I have nothing against the players...I do not want any of them to be injured or wish anything bad towards any of them. I am not biased against the Skins, but I don't have a very high opinion of their owner which is the starting point for me when i start talking about these teams. I hope you can get past the Skins as I am going to have 7 more of these threads and I would really like to hear from you in some of these. Cheers :wall:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
RB: Portis has been so up and down, very underwhelming to me most of last season…he was in the top half of starting RB but he didn’t carry anyone to a championship, please! The guy avg under 4 ypc for the 2nd time since being in Washington. I think if you have an owner that is hot for Portis that you should sell big time. He will be entering his 7th season in 2008 so the mileage is adding up with this guy.
:confused: He had 1600+ combined yards and double digit TDs last year. He was the #4 fantasy RB based on FBG scoring.Now he's going to be the primary back in a Holmgren-style WCO. There may be some growing pains learning the new offense, but Portis is by far a good player to invest in, FF-wise.
 
You will see as I keep releasing these threads that I am not picking on teams, just going with what they are doing presently.
Except you're not.You mention and praise accomplishments and/or players that far precede the current management and coaching systems of the Cowboys, Giants and Eagles, but neglect to do so for the Redskins.

 
RB: Portis has been so up and down, very underwhelming to me most of last season…he was in the top half of starting RB but he didn’t carry anyone to a championship, please! The guy avg under 4 ypc for the 2nd time since being in Washington. I think if you have an owner that is hot for Portis that you should sell big time. He will be entering his 7th season in 2008 so the mileage is adding up with this guy.
:hifive: He had 1600+ combined yards and double digit TDs last year. He was the #4 fantasy RB based on FBG scoring.Now he's going to be the primary back in a Holmgren-style WCO. There may be some growing pains learning the new offense, but Portis is by far a good player to invest in, FF-wise.
I would take out the 4 TD he got in weeks 15-17 as a lot of owners could not use him at that point. but here is what the #4 RB in FF did on the ground last season. 17/9817/6914/6018/7220/6418/4311/27Those are his rushing stats the 1st 7 games of the season...he did manage 5 TD during that span which helped keep him in there as a starting RB. but those rushing stats are not that good, let's be honest. He had big weeks in 9 and 10 with 36/196 and 30/137...now let's look what happened next.12/3620/6825/5017/36...like I said he was not winning games for owners or even covering up for possible short comings from the RB2 slots for some people. Portis was an OK RB2 when you add in his receiving stats but he wasn't taking the FF world by storm last season. It was off year in general for a lot RB...with just a couple of RB who were actually "special" last season. And even those guys had some serious dips in the road be it injuries or whatnot.
 
I was quite interested in reading this thread based on the title. But unfortunately I don't think you really did what you set out to do. I think a look at different types of organizational philosophies and a comparison between the types of on field success different models have had would be interesting. This seems to be more of a discussion of the particular players in each position group for each team along with an occasional comment about an owner or coach.

Tell me something about how these various organizations are actually run and I'll be interested. How are decisions made? Are managers (and in a football context that means GMs, coaches, and scouts) held accountable for their decisions? Is there a clear leader for the franchise, whether it is the owner, coach, or GM? Has that leader clearly communicated the culture and values of the organization? These are the questions that need to be answered if you actually want to talk about organizational philosophy.

 
You will see as I keep releasing these threads that I am not picking on teams, just going with what they are doing presently.
Except you're not.You mention and praise accomplishments and/or players that far precede the current management and coaching systems of the Cowboys, Giants and Eagles, but neglect to do so for the Redskins.
OK, this is a good question and something I didn't all together explain. I am using the ghosts of the past more as a way to show that certain teams have a real propensity for putting out NFL Stars consistently. Now if we want to talk about Washington, we can bring up some of their accomplsihments for sure. But just at the QBs...was Theismann a a good FF QB? Did Doug Williams last? Mark Rypien? The track record is not all that extraordinary.And the days of them battering Riggins, or Byner, or whoever, they simply are not that team anymore...and Portis is not those type of backs.

Skinsfans could have taken the lead and run with it, I never said what I was writing was the end all be all, but instead most of the Washingotn support group seems to just be licking their wounds and not all that forthcoming with some reasons why FF owners should be excited about them moving forward...instead I am just getting one liners to try and combat what i am printing and to em the issue is a nonissue if that is the line of debate that Skinsfans are going to use. I think there is a lesson to elarn here and it is one that I poind on when it comes to football and that is that usually fans cannot be objectionable when it comes to their teams. And so far this thread is no exception.

 
I was quite interested in reading this thread based on the title. But unfortunately I don't think you really did what you set out to do. I think a look at different types of organizational philosophies and a comparison between the types of on field success different models have had would be interesting. This seems to be more of a discussion of the particular players in each position group for each team along with an occasional comment about an owner or coach. Tell me something about how these various organizations are actually run and I'll be interested. How are decisions made? Are managers (and in a football context that means GMs, coaches, and scouts) held accountable for their decisions? Is there a clear leader for the franchise, whether it is the owner, coach, or GM? Has that leader clearly communicated the culture and values of the organization? These are the questions that need to be answered if you actually want to talk about organizational philosophy.
Great points Q-Bert, will try and incrporate more of that moving forward. I was hoping that folks like you would also add to that and be able to teach the masses as well.
 
How do you mention the Cowboys without mentioning the lack of a playoff win in how many years yet mention SBs they won decades ago?

 
RB: Portis has been so up and down, very underwhelming to me most of last season…he was in the top half of starting RB but he didn’t carry anyone to a championship, please! The guy avg under 4 ypc for the 2nd time since being in Washington. I think if you have an owner that is hot for Portis that you should sell big time. He will be entering his 7th season in 2008 so the mileage is adding up with this guy.
:shock: He had 1600+ combined yards and double digit TDs last year. He was the #4 fantasy RB based on FBG scoring.Now he's going to be the primary back in a Holmgren-style WCO. There may be some growing pains learning the new offense, but Portis is by far a good player to invest in, FF-wise.
I would take out the 4 TD he got in weeks 15-17 as a lot of owners could not use him at that point. but here is what the #4 RB in FF did on the ground last season. 17/9817/6914/6018/7220/6418/4311/27Those are his rushing stats the 1st 7 games of the season...he did manage 5 TD during that span which helped keep him in there as a starting RB. but those rushing stats are not that good, let's be honest. He had big weeks in 9 and 10 with 36/196 and 30/137...now let's look what happened next.12/3620/6825/5017/36...like I said he was not winning games for owners or even covering up for possible short comings from the RB2 slots for some people. Portis was an OK RB2 when you add in his receiving stats but he wasn't taking the FF world by storm last season. It was off year in general for a lot RB...with just a couple of RB who were actually "special" last season. And even those guys had some serious dips in the road be it injuries or whatnot.
Portis was far better than an OK RB2. That is ridiculous. He scored me 12 points or more 11 of 16 weeks last year. The only RBs who were better than that, more consistent, where LT and Westy. Not to mention he finished as the 5th best RB. While Lewis was pretty close to him at RB6, the difference between Portis and RB7 was 25.2 points and the difference between Portis and RB8 was 37.9. There is no way you can twist the numbers to suggest that is an OK RB2 performance. :goodposting:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
RB: Portis has been so up and down, very underwhelming to me most of last season…he was in the top half of starting RB but he didn’t carry anyone to a championship, please! The guy avg under 4 ypc for the 2nd time since being in Washington. I think if you have an owner that is hot for Portis that you should sell big time. He will be entering his 7th season in 2008 so the mileage is adding up with this guy.
:confused: He had 1600+ combined yards and double digit TDs last year. He was the #4 fantasy RB based on FBG scoring.Now he's going to be the primary back in a Holmgren-style WCO. There may be some growing pains learning the new offense, but Portis is by far a good player to invest in, FF-wise.
I would take out the 4 TD he got in weeks 15-17 as a lot of owners could not use him at that point. but here is what the #4 RB in FF did on the ground last season. 17/9817/6914/6018/7220/6418/4311/27Those are his rushing stats the 1st 7 games of the season...he did manage 5 TD during that span which helped keep him in there as a starting RB. but those rushing stats are not that good, let's be honest. He had big weeks in 9 and 10 with 36/196 and 30/137...now let's look what happened next.12/3620/6825/5017/36...like I said he was not winning games for owners or even covering up for possible short comings from the RB2 slots for some people. Portis was an OK RB2 when you add in his receiving stats but he wasn't taking the FF world by storm last season. It was off year in general for a lot RB...with just a couple of RB who were actually "special" last season. And even those guys had some serious dips in the road be it injuries or whatnot.
Portis was far better than an OK RB2. That is ridiculous. He scored me 12 points or more 11 of 16 weeks last year. The only RBs who were better than that, more consistent, where LT and Westy. Not to mention he finished as the 5th best RB. While Lewis was pretty close to him at RB6, the difference between Portis and RB7 was 25.2 points and the difference between Portis and RB8 was 37.9. There is no way you can twist the numbers to suggest that is an OK RB2 performance. :coffee:
In years past the RB1 had a huge difference between them and the next few RB or the top2...this past season not so much. I think Portis in most seasons would have been a top10-12 RB at best and not the 5th best RB...he did nothing special at the position last season.
 
RB: Portis has been so up and down, very underwhelming to me most of last season…he was in the top half of starting RB but he didn’t carry anyone to a championship, please! The guy avg under 4 ypc for the 2nd time since being in Washington. I think if you have an owner that is hot for Portis that you should sell big time. He will be entering his 7th season in 2008 so the mileage is adding up with this guy.
:yes: He had 1600+ combined yards and double digit TDs last year. He was the #4 fantasy RB based on FBG scoring.Now he's going to be the primary back in a Holmgren-style WCO. There may be some growing pains learning the new offense, but Portis is by far a good player to invest in, FF-wise.
I would take out the 4 TD he got in weeks 15-17 as a lot of owners could not use him at that point. but here is what the #4 RB in FF did on the ground last season. 17/9817/6914/6018/7220/6418/4311/27Those are his rushing stats the 1st 7 games of the season...he did manage 5 TD during that span which helped keep him in there as a starting RB. but those rushing stats are not that good, let's be honest. He had big weeks in 9 and 10 with 36/196 and 30/137...now let's look what happened next.12/3620/6825/5017/36...like I said he was not winning games for owners or even covering up for possible short comings from the RB2 slots for some people. Portis was an OK RB2 when you add in his receiving stats but he wasn't taking the FF world by storm last season. It was off year in general for a lot RB...with just a couple of RB who were actually "special" last season. And even those guys had some serious dips in the road be it injuries or whatnot.
Portis was far better than an OK RB2. That is ridiculous. He scored me 12 points or more 11 of 16 weeks last year. The only RBs who were better than that, more consistent, where LT and Westy. Not to mention he finished as the 5th best RB. While Lewis was pretty close to him at RB6, the difference between Portis and RB7 was 25.2 points and the difference between Portis and RB8 was 37.9. There is no way you can twist the numbers to suggest that is an OK RB2 performance. :lmao:
In years past the RB1 had a huge difference between them and the next few RB or the top2...this past season not so much. I think Portis in most seasons would have been a top10-12 RB at best and not the 5th best RB...he did nothing special at the position last season.
It doesn't matter where you think he would have finished in most seasons. 5 is where he DID finish last season. In reality, it wasn't even close to him not being a RB1. You can only rank a player vs. his peers. Not your hypothetical situation. You can fret over Portis' future value all you want. You proclaimed that he was an OK RB2 last year. That is about as false a statement as you can possibly make.
 
New York Giants: I will say this though, after they win these Super Bowls, the organization in my opinion does not put a great emphasis on getting back there.
Stopped reading right there. An utterly ridiculous and unfounded comment. Should they overspend on marginally good talent when they don't have a glaring weakness at the same time they have demonstrated that this organization under its current leadership has exceptional drafting skills?I guess that means they aren't trying. :thumbdown:

You want to poke holes in the Giants philosophy as it relates to fantasy? Go ahead, and you'd have many strong points to make... but obviously you don't know much about the organization in real NFL terms, judging by that comment.

 
It doesn't matter where you think he would have finished in most seasons. 5 is where he DID finish last season. In reality, it wasn't even close to him not being a RB1. You can only rank a player vs. his peers. Not your hypothetical situation. You can fret over Portis' future value all you want. You proclaimed that he was an OK RB2 last year. That is about as false a statement as you can possibly make.
That's one way to look at it. I like to look at the production thru about week 13 or 14 as what they do in the regualr season means an awful lot more to me over seeing a guy go off in weeks 15-17 when they may have run their owners into the ground. Also I like to look at the production on a per game basis...was Clinton portis a better RB over Ronnie Brown and Adrian Peterson last year? On a PPG basis he was not close to those guys. And when we look at Portis on a PPG basis thru week 14 of the 2007 season he ended up #11 with 13.00 points a game even. The difference between Portis at #11 and Willie Parker at #18 is only 1.5 points a game...so where is the real impact of what Portis did last year? I didn't make these numbers up, go back and look it up. You gotta take a step back and look at the whole picture here...not just the blanket or what I like to refer to as points in a vacuum that so many like to do on here. Portis did not make owners jump for joy during the regular season in a lot of leagues where he was drafted. I think he was an RB2 almost across the board. He rarely won a game on his own and most RB1 to me are guys like LT or Peterson who ahd games where they took over. Portis didn't really have many of those games last season. We can agree to disagree and maybe Portis was a borderline RB1, but to just say he was the 5th best RB in FF last season is a very misleading statement and doesn't take into account what was really happening week in and week out. I don't remember anyone really banging the drum in all of those RB threads I wrote last season. i could go back and check but I don't think Portis was one of those backs we were all going gaga over. Year in and year out I stress that only a handful of players make the difference in these leagues. Last season it was Westbrtook, LT, Adrian Peterson, and Joseph Addai were the main difference makers. In my opinion they were the only RB1 of any real substance. Wehave different definitions of what RB1 are...you I assume think that if there are 12 teams in the league that there are 12 RB1...and that is simply not true IMO. Let me explain this furthur...the average of the top 12 RB in total points not PPG last season was roughly about 200 FF points when you exclude PPR, this is straight from the FBG stats thru week 14. At an avg of 200 points, Portis had 169 or a difference of over 2 points a week below. And low and behold the 4 RB that cleared the 200 benchmark were LT(253), Westbrook(247), Addai(213), and Peterson(209)...now again I don't make these things up in my head and I understand what I am going over is hard for people that are programmed to have 12 RB1 to sit down and digest but when you think about it, it's really true. There were 4 RB that made a big difference last season for owners during the regular season.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It doesn't matter where you think he would have finished in most seasons. 5 is where he DID finish last season. In reality, it wasn't even close to him not being a RB1. You can only rank a player vs. his peers. Not your hypothetical situation. You can fret over Portis' future value all you want. You proclaimed that he was an OK RB2 last year. That is about as false a statement as you can possibly make.
That's one way to look at it. I like to look at the production thru about week 13 or 14 as what they do in the regualr season means an awful lot ot me over seeing a guy go off in weks 15-17 when they may have run their owners into the ground. Also i like to look at the production on a per game basis...was Clinton portis a better RB over Ronnie Brown and Adrian Peterson last year? On a PPG basis he was not close to those guys. And when we look at Portis on a PPG basis thru week 14 of the 2007 season he ended up #11 with 13.00 points a game even. The difference between Portis at #11 and Willie Parker at #18 is only 1.5 points a game...so where is the real impact of what Portis did last year? I didn't make these numbers up, go back and look it up. You gotta take a step back and look at the whole picture here...not just the blanket or what I like to refer to as points in a vacuum that so many like to do on here. Portis did not make owners jump for joy during the regular season in a lot of leagues where he was drafted. I think he was an RB2 almost across the board. He rarely won a game on his own and most RB1 to me are guys like LT or Peterson who ahd games where they took over. Portis didn't really have many of those games last season.

We can agree to disagree and maybe Portis was a borderline RB1, but to just say he was the 5th best RB in FF last season is a very misleading statement and doesn't take into account what was really happening week in and week out. I don't remember anyone really banging the drum in all of those RB threads I wrote last season. i could go back and check but I don't think Portis was one of those backs we were all going gaga over.

Year in and year out I stress that only a handful of players make the difference in these leagues. Last season it was Westbrtook, LT, Adrian Peterson, and Joseph Addai were the main difference makers. In my opinion they were the only RB1 of any real substance. Wehave different definitions of what RB1 are...you I assume think that if there are 12 teams in the league that there are 12 RB1...and that is simply not true IMO.

Let me explain this furthur...the average of the top 12 RB in total points not PPG last season was roughly about 200 FF points when you exclude PPR, this is straight from the FBG stats thru week 14. At an avg of 200 points, Portis had 169 or a difference of over 2 points a week below. And low and behold the 4 RB that cleared the 200 benchmark were LT(253), Westbrook(247), Addai(213), and Peterson(209)...now again I don't make these things up in my head and I understand what I am going over is hard for people that are programmed to have 12 RB1 to sit down and digest but when you think about it, it's really true. There were 4 RB that made a big difference last season for owners during the regular season.
Wow, so even with your cherry picked stats Portis was still a RB1.....
 
It doesn't matter where you think he would have finished in most seasons. 5 is where he DID finish last season. In reality, it wasn't even close to him not being a RB1. You can only rank a player vs. his peers. Not your hypothetical situation. You can fret over Portis' future value all you want. You proclaimed that he was an OK RB2 last year. That is about as false a statement as you can possibly make.
That's one way to look at it. I like to look at the production thru about week 13 or 14 as what they do in the regualr season means an awful lot ot me over seeing a guy go off in weks 15-17 when they may have run their owners into the ground. Also i like to look at the production on a per game basis...was Clinton portis a better RB over Ronnie Brown and Adrian Peterson last year? On a PPG basis he was not close to those guys. And when we look at Portis on a PPG basis thru week 14 of the 2007 season he ended up #11 with 13.00 points a game even. The difference between Portis at #11 and Willie Parker at #18 is only 1.5 points a game...so where is the real impact of what Portis did last year? I didn't make these numbers up, go back and look it up. You gotta take a step back and look at the whole picture here...not just the blanket or what I like to refer to as points in a vacuum that so many like to do on here. Portis did not make owners jump for joy during the regular season in a lot of leagues where he was drafted. I think he was an RB2 almost across the board. He rarely won a game on his own and most RB1 to me are guys like LT or Peterson who ahd games where they took over. Portis didn't really have many of those games last season.

We can agree to disagree and maybe Portis was a borderline RB1, but to just say he was the 5th best RB in FF last season is a very misleading statement and doesn't take into account what was really happening week in and week out. I don't remember anyone really banging the drum in all of those RB threads I wrote last season. i could go back and check but I don't think Portis was one of those backs we were all going gaga over.

Year in and year out I stress that only a handful of players make the difference in these leagues. Last season it was Westbrtook, LT, Adrian Peterson, and Joseph Addai were the main difference makers. In my opinion they were the only RB1 of any real substance. Wehave different definitions of what RB1 are...you I assume think that if there are 12 teams in the league that there are 12 RB1...and that is simply not true IMO.

Let me explain this furthur...the average of the top 12 RB in total points not PPG last season was roughly about 200 FF points when you exclude PPR, this is straight from the FBG stats thru week 14. At an avg of 200 points, Portis had 169 or a difference of over 2 points a week below. And low and behold the 4 RB that cleared the 200 benchmark were LT(253), Westbrook(247), Addai(213), and Peterson(209)...now again I don't make these things up in my head and I understand what I am going over is hard for people that are programmed to have 12 RB1 to sit down and digest but when you think about it, it's really true. There were 4 RB that made a big difference last season for owners during the regular season.
Wow, so even with your cherry picked stats Portis was still a RB1.....
You can't possibly use that as the basis of your platofrm for him after I wrote all that can you? Cherry picked? I just reported where Portis ranked at the end of the regular season in most FF leagues. He's a possible RB1 in your mind, and in what you define as an RB1, however as I pointed out, i typically like to take the top 12 RB, add up their points, divide by 12 and that gives me the benchmark to measure them against. I'm sorry but Portis was not an elite RB in terms of FF last season and to make that statement to me is misleading. If the whole board sides with you, good for them, but I think the more people start looking at these stats the way I have been for the past couple of seasons they will likely come up with the same conclusions that I have. Good stuff Jurb, and I like the fact you are challenging my opinion which is what it is.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Interesting stuff, thanks for taking the time to write....One could argue over the past 20+ years that the NFC East may be the toughest division in football.

I do have one issue to take with you and it could be because I'm a Giants homer......How the hell can you say the Giants are the worst Super bowl winner of all time? They beat two excellent teams in Dallas and Green Bay, and an undefeated monster in New England......The Giants may have bloomed late but no way are they the worst Super bowl winner of all time.

 
however as I pointed out, i typically like to take the top 12 RB, add up their points, divide by 12 and that gives me the benchmark to measure them against. I'm sorry but Portis was not an elite RB in terms of FF last season
Not an elite RB is one thing...calling him an OK RB2 is another.If you want to say he's not a top-4 RB, fine...but don't confuse people by calling a top-ten RB an "OK RB2". That's the kind of thing that makes people think that you're biased.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You want to poke holes in the Giants philosophy as it relates to fantasy? Go ahead, and you'd have many strong points to make... but obviously you don't know much about the organization in real NFL terms, judging by that comment.
Frankly I don't see anything in MoP's post about teams' current "organizational philosophy".Just some guy's opinion dressed up with a couple of SAT words.
 
Fasincating that you go back far enough to talk about all five championships with the Cowboys, and imply that Jones' management is just a continuation of the Cowboys' long tradition, and yet your treatment of the Redskins goes back only 8 years. You hate Snyder. Fine. Don't pretend that your treatment is about much more than getting to that punchline.
Agreed, this is a very biased post. I had to quit reading halfway through the Cowboy section because there was so much I disagreed with I didn't want to try and respond.
How is it biased when i have no roothing interest in any of these 4 teams?
Biased enough that I can name fans from each of the Redskins rival teams on these forums that I'd view as being more objective about my team than you are.
Again Red, there is nothing you are writing that could be viewed as anything other than a sore fan who feels like I am picking on his team. You will see as I keep releasing these threads that I am not picking on teams, just going with what they are doing presently. And I listed the teams in alphabetical order, it's not ranked 1-2-3-4 or anything although I was pretty brutal when it came to the Skins. I am not seeing anything you are writing that says that you DO NOT agree with me that Dan Snyder is pretty much up to this point been a lousy onwer or leader if you will. I have nothing against the players...I do not want any of them to be injured or wish anything bad towards any of them. I am not biased against the Skins, but I don't have a very high opinion of their owner which is the starting point for me when i start talking about these teams. I hope you can get past the Skins as I am going to have 7 more of these threads and I would really like to hear from you in some of these. Cheers :lmao:
I can't wait to see the horrible tradition of the New England Patriots. They were terrible before Kraft and Belichek.
 
Washington Redskins:

The Joe Gibbs experiment really didn’t go anywhere.
Wrong. The roster has more depth now, is younger, has more draft choices. And oh yeah, they made the playoffs 2 out of 4 years Gibbs was there, including last year.
RB: Portis has been so up and down, very underwhelming to me most of last season…
#5 RB. I guess that doesn't count because, you know, you have to take out the TDs that didn't count and stuff.
I think Washington in general is in disarray and I don not ee them as a team on the rise.
You thought that last year and were wrong. You're consistent. :lmao:
abrecher said:
Frankly I don't see anything in MoP's post about teams' current "organizational philosophy".
Neither do I. It's just his first fling at Redskin bashing this year.
 
Marvelous said:
I can't wait to see the horrible tradition of the New England Patriots. They were terrible before Kraft and Belichek.
Parcells and Raymond Berry took them to a Supe, granted they lost but...horrible?Terrible years like a 1-15 season sure, but I'd figure as long as you make the Supe every now and again I figure you're doing OK
 
Good idea :(

Poor execution :thumbdown:

:cry:

Edit to add- I should say that you should have stuck to the organizational philosophy of the current regime. That being the Owner/GM/ HC. What was done 20 years ago under different ownership means nothing.

Theisman has nothing to do with the current Redskins situation nor does LT effect the current Giants. The fact that Philly RBs are historically average means nothing to the current people in charge.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good idea :D

Poor execution :shrug:

:tfp:

Edit to add- I should say that you should have stuck to the organizational philosophy of the current regime. That being the Owner/GM/ HC. What was done 20 years ago under different ownership means nothing.

Theisman has nothing to do with the current Redskins situation nor does LT effect the current Giants. The fact that Philly RBs are historically average means nothing to the current people in charge.
Fair enough. I'll try and change it up a bit on the next ones. I was really just trying to highlight how some teams over history are able to produce a winner and yet some teams even with a level playing field in terms of money are still awful.
 
Fasincating that you go back far enough to talk about all five championships with the Cowboys, and imply that Jones' management is just a continuation of the Cowboys' long tradition, and yet your treatment of the Redskins goes back only 8 years. You hate Snyder. Fine. Don't pretend that your treatment is about much more than getting to that punchline.
Agreed, this is a very biased post. I had to quit reading halfway through the Cowboy section because there was so much I disagreed with I didn't want to try and respond.
How is it biased when i have no roothing interest in any of these 4 teams?
Biased enough that I can name fans from each of the Redskins rival teams on these forums that I'd view as being more objective about my team than you are.
I'll back Red on his objectivity of his own team, not a as comparison between you as that is useless anyway.
 
I certainly applaud you for the effort, as it appears you put a decent amount of time and thought into this. But the guy who said your execution was poor is being kind.

For example, I don't know what's more ridiculous -- claiming Portis is an ok #2 rb or not counting a player's stats from weeks 14 - 16, which are the most important weeks of the season.

If Portis was your #2 rb last season, then he was probably the best #2 rb in your league as there were only 4 other rb's better than him overall. As I stated last preseason, Portis was the Mayor of Valuetown, and he was undoubtedly the best rb value pick this side of AD. Without him, I wouldn't of won my Super Bowl against my opponent who had Westbrook, Brady, Moss, SJax, Jennings, and a host of other good players. I know there are countless other Super Bowl champions who wouldn't have won their games without Portis on their teams as well.

Pretty much any n00b or fish knows Portis is a good #1 rb, which makes your comments so baffling, because you should obvioulsly know better (aren't you the guy who does the weekly rb rankings during the season?).

My advice to you would be to swallow your pride and just admit you're wrong on this subject in order to regain your credibility. If you keep trying to dig out of the hole you're in you'll be in China by sundown tomorrow at this rate.

 
however as I pointed out, i typically like to take the top 12 RB, add up their points, divide by 12 and that gives me the benchmark to measure them against. I'm sorry but Portis was not an elite RB in terms of FF last season
Not an elite RB is one thing...calling him an OK RB2 is another.If you want to say he's not a top-4 RB, fine...but don't confuse people by calling a top-ten RB an "OK RB2". That's the kind of thing that makes people think that you're biased.
Thank you. This is all I am trying to say, MOP. I'm not trying to be confrontational. Honestly I think you just got caught up and exaggerated a bit. I feel you in the argument that Portis was not elite. I was never trying to dispute that. Only a handful of guys can be called elite. Certainly not every RB1 or WR1 or any position 1 can be grace with the title elite. You however originally stated that Portis was far less than elite. You claimed he was an OK RB2. That just statistically and factually is false no matter how you look at it last year.
 
I don't have a dog in this fight, but I figured I'd throw in my 2 cents...Maybe the real debate isn't over Portis per se. To me it seems it's more about what MOP considers a RB1 to be. Owner X may say that anybody in the top 12 after 14 weeks is a RB1 Owner Y may say that only the guys that outscore their peers by 5 PPG over 17 weeks is a RB1 (what some one might consider the Stud in their Stud RB Draft Strategy) and who they feel they should build their team around. I think you guys are really debating your philosophy and Portis is the example not really the basis of your argument.

 
This is great! I've been meaning to do the same, because I really do think there are teams that are generally good when it comes to producing FF-worthy players and those that are generally bad. It's not final and determinative, but it is certainly a factor and an important tie-breaker. For example, I steer clear of Raiders. Doesn't mean that they won't have good players, it just means that there is a higher risk because a malaise could come about the team that could suck the life out of a good player (see Moss, Randy). I just can't trust Al Davis to not hire another inn-keeper to run the offense. Not always true - for example, I would normally stay away from Bengals and Texans, but both teams have produced some very FF-worthy players. On the flipside, I'll err on the side of taking Patriots, Colts, and Seahawks because I like there philosophy. I think they bring in high-character guys and have a real team philosophy. Again, that doesn't mean that they are infallible (see Stevens, Jerramy and Robinson, Koren), but I like my odds.

My goal is to take this info and add in team data (like DVOA, points scored, yards, etc), and come up with a team ranking. Then within a tier of similar players, I'll likely use that list to break ties. For example, in a recent Welker v. Cotchery thread, I would use my list to rank Welker higher because I don't yet have trust in Mangini and the Jets organization. That may change if they become like the Pats in the future.

Can't wait to see this whole list, preferably in some type of ranking.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top