Keerock
Footballguy
Potato vodka and boiled spuds?Oh BTW I got rip-roaring drunk last night and ate everything in sight.![]()
Potato vodka and boiled spuds?Oh BTW I got rip-roaring drunk last night and ate everything in sight.![]()
These posts confuse me. If I get in a work jam my response isn't to gain I almost always lose weight because I lose the time to eat and drink and lift. I don't start eating #### because I'm stressed i just simply will try to at least meet psmf macro levels and hope I don't drop too much gains.I think the universe is out to kill me. Another health issue combined with a draconian trial schedule has obliterated my best laid plans. And while I am strong enough to overcome these issues, the wife has a health issue that is making this all impossible.
Good news is we should both come out fine. Bad news is I have no chance of coming close to be in the running for this, if I ever was.
Oh I know that. Was just sad to realize how far the mighyt have fallenDoesn't matter How much you lift now vs then. You'll make dem gainz
Eating junk food when stressed is a common issue for people that struggle with their weight.These posts confuse me. If I get in a work jam my response isn't to gain I almost always lose weight because I lose the time to eat and drink and lift. I don't start eating #### because I'm stressed i just simply will try to at least meet psmf macro levels and hope I don't drop too much gains.
Why?aspartame. no thanks
tastes like ####, that's why![]()
The most widely studied sweetener evah.
Yeah I get that. Its just a bummer to see it happen to people almost in advance of an event.Eating junk food when stressed is a common issue for people that struggle with their weight.
Horrible stuff. Black flag item. There's enough science out there that's in the good enough category for me to black flag it.My personal belief is that all sweeteners should be avoided as much as possible, even those that are no calories. Admittedly it isn't a belief based on rigorous scientific analysis.
There are some newer studies that show that artificial sweeteners trigger an insulin response and may effect other hormones that have some bearing on weight regulation. Maurile's boy Stephen Guyenet recommends avoiding artificial sweeteners as a way to reduce food reward, which he believes affects the body's regulation of its set point.My personal belief is that all sweeteners should be avoided as much as possible, even those that are no calories. Admittedly it isn't a belief based on rigorous scientific analysis.
LOOK AT ME I'M NOT A STRESS EATER!!!1!!These posts confuse me. If I get in a work jam my response isn't to gain I almost always lose weight because I lose the time to eat and drink and lift. I don't start eating #### because I'm stressed i just simply will try to at least meet psmf macro levels and hope I don't drop too much gains.
Camping tonight - sitting around the campfire - plan on having a couple of dogs but usual plan is smores and copious amounts of alcohol.
![]()
Let me know where and I may be able to help you with the hot dogs an alcoholCamping tonight - sitting around the campfire - plan on having a couple of dogs but usual plan is smores and copious amounts of alcohol.
![]()
It's one of life's simple pleasures but sitting around a campfire drinking is one of my favorite things to do.Let me know where and I may be able to help you with the hot dogs an alcohol![]()
And grilling your Weiner....If you know what I meanAAABatteries said:It's one of life's simple pleasures but sitting around a campfire drinking is one of my favorite things to do.
i don't like ingesting chemicals? i think artificial sweeteners not only taste disgusting but are harder for your body to process than natural sweeteners.Charlie Harper said:Why?
What self respecting male human being doesn't like that?AAABatteries said:It's one of life's simple pleasures but sitting around a campfire drinking is one of my favorite things to do.
He touches on it here while discussing a recent study by Kevin Hall:The trick to making it easier to keep weight off in the long term is to adjust your bodyweight set-point, which would otherwise defend against fat loss by ramping up appetite. I'm only a few chapters into the Guyenet book and he hasn't touched on this yet, but I expect that he'll spend a fair number of words on it given that it's an area of his own research.
There are several interesting implications of this study. The first is that the data support our current understanding of how body weight is regulated. Even when energy balance was perturbed without the participants’ knowledge, a powerful starvation response occurred that favored the regain of lost weight. The data support the concept that a sort of body weight “set point” is defended against changes, particularly changes in the downward direction.
A second implication is that between the two arms of the starvation response– the increased drive to eat and the decreased calorie expenditure– the former is by far the more influential. In other words, the primary way in which the brain opposes weight loss is by increasing the biological drive to eat. The data also give us a quantitative estimate of this drive: for each 2.2 lbs (1 kg) of weight lost, the drive to eat increases by about 100 Calories per day. This is even stronger than I would have predicted.
A third implication – which I think is the most novel of the study – relates to the dynamics of the heightened drive to eat that people experience when they diet, and how this undermines weight loss efforts. After a person loses weight, the biological drive to eat can be so high that they have to exert considerable effort just to prevent themselves from overeating substantially. Even though it seems like they’re no longer adhering to their reduced calorie regimen, they may still be trying hard to eat fewer calories – and succeeding, relative to the amount their brain “wants” them to eat.
The amount of effort that people put into a diet does slowly decline over time however, and as this effort recedes, the biological drive to eat takes over and weight comes back. It’s hard to fight the starvation response forever.
This study strengthens my conviction that the brain’s starvation response has to be managed for long-term weight loss success – and particularly its impact on the drive to eat. Rather than pretending like the starvation response doesn’t exist, as most weight loss approaches do, a better method may be to try to dampen appetite and/or passive calorie intake sufficiently to counterbalance the heightened drive to eat. In other words, find ways to keep the brain happy at a lower calorie intake rather than using willpower to continually struggle against the biological drive to eat.
In other words, find ways to keep the brain happy at a lower calorie intake rather than using willpower to continually struggle against the biological drive to eat.
But what mechanism does he propose? This sounds like a Tryptophan -->Serotonin angle.In other words, find ways to keep the brain happy at a lower calorie intake rather than using willpower to continually struggle against the biological drive to eat.
Curious to see the current negative science.In the body, aspartame is broken down into phenylalanine, aspartic acid, and methanol. Methanol can be toxic in high amounts, but the amounts that result from the breakdown of aspartame is lower than with many “natural” foods. For example, drinking a liter of diet soda would lead to consumption of 55 milligrams (mg) of methanol, as compared to as much as 680 mg of methanol from a liter of fruit juice.
Phenylalanine and aspartic acid are amino acids and are naturally present in many foods that contain protein.
That's from a cancer perspective. We aren't discussing cancer here.
Good call.AAABatteries said:It's one of life's simple pleasures but sitting around a campfire drinking is one of my favorite things to do.
People are different. You seem like you struggle to put weight on- that doesn't confuse me, but it annoys the crap out of me. My brother was like that. Skinny, lanky dude, Hummingbird metabolism, and never cared about eating. Had to force himself to eat, like it was punishment, or a job. ****.culdeus said:These posts confuse me. If I get in a work jam my response isn't to gain I almost always lose weight because I lose the time to eat and drink and lift. I don't start eating #### because I'm stressed i just simply will try to at least meet psmf macro levels and hope I don't drop too much gains.
One cheat meal can derail a whole week if you're not careful.So I am doing one cheat meal a week. About to tear into some pizza and garlic knots.
That's why you have to go for much bigger deficits during the week. Then you can go bananas on the weekend and still lose weight. WIN WINOne cheat meal can derail a whole week if you're not careful.
If you're at a 500 calorie deficit for 6 days...that's 3000 calories under. I can easily eat 1 large pizza (2000+ calories), so I'm sure that's no problem for you fatties. Then add in bread sticks that's easily near 3k. If you eat "normal" for your other 2 meals ...then your cheat meal just destroyed your weeks worth of dieting.
In short....enjoy the cheat meal (they are necessary for mental health), but be mindful of your portions.
Going with the Bulleit bourbon tonight![]()
big fan
I think he thinks it's mostly a leptin mechanism, from what I've read. Guyenet proposes mostly bland Whole Foods. Adequate protein. No refined carbs (rice and potatoes are OK). No added fat or salt in cooking.But what mechanism does he propose? This sounds like a Tryptophan -->Serotonin angle.
I doubt he proposes a single mechanism. He's always talking about how multi-factorial and complicated things are. Appetite is regulated largely by the brain -- mostly by the hypothalamus -- which involves multiple neurons. (Not to mention hormones, etc.)But what mechanism does he propose? This sounds like a Tryptophan -->Serotonin angle.
I hope it was delightful. Should be a good yearNice 2010 bottle of Margaux cracked after a couple of beers earlier. 70 degrees in NY in February. Gotta celebrate that.
Now that I've listen to this, I very highly recommend it. It touches on a lot of topics that have been brought up in this thread. An hour well spent. (Although I found the host kind of annoying.)There's also a podcast here that I haven't listened to yet.
Is he sweating from the low intensity workout, or the pigs in a blanket?
Depends. Is the real ribeye, from a cow, invoking a detrimental insulin response? Apples and oranges IMO (no pun intended). There are plenty of "real" foods you can eat that are just as bad for you (or worse) than many "artificial" foods.aspartame and it's ilk fall into the common sense category for me.
hypothetical question: would you rather have a synthetic ribeye made up of a bunch of chemicals you can't pronounce, let alone know what they do your body? or a real ribeye, from a cow?
give me real anything over artificial every time.
i've always said, it's better for you to have a beer than a soda. soda is full of ####, coloring, sweeteners, etc.![]()
A number of us use myfitnesspalI've started using a free app called "Lose it" to track my eating. I've found it's really helping me. Down 3 pounds in 2 weeks.
Basically I know how to eat healthy and to lose weight, but if I don't track my eating my portion sizes ended up being too big, and I cheat. It may not work for everyone but for me if I write down everything I eat it then I don't cheat and I drop weight; simple as that.
Hopefully I'll keep this up and won't get lazy about it.
None of this makes any sense.I've started using a free app called "Lose it" to track my eating. I've found it's really helping me. Down 3 pounds in 2 weeks.
Basically I know how to eat healthy and to lose weight, but if I don't track my eating my portion sizes ended up being too big, and I cheat. It may not work for everyone but for me if I write down everything I eat it then I don't cheat and I drop weight; simple as that.
Hopefully I'll keep this up and won't get lazy about it.
