What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Packers RB discussion (1 Viewer)

Should Morency stop fumbling, he should have the inside track to the starters job, and by all accounts he is making the most of it. This will be one of the more interesting camp battles to keep an eye on for sure.
Another paralel to Green (not that it matters) - Green fumbled early in his career because of 'sweaty arms'Tiki Barber was a fumble as well until Coughlin corrected the issue. Fumbling can sometimes be corrected.And Block was correct in the interpretation of my earlier post above.
 
Should Morency stop fumbling, he should have the inside track to the starters job, and by all accounts he is making the most of it. This will be one of the more interesting camp battles to keep an eye on for sure.
Another paralel to Green (not that it matters) - Green fumbled early in his career because of 'sweaty arms'Tiki Barber was a fumble as well until Coughlin corrected the issue. Fumbling can sometimes be corrected.And Block was correct in the interpretation of my earlier post above.
Green also fumbles because he refused to learn to shift the ball to the outside arm. In viewing the video on Jackson, it appears that he tends to carry the ball in his left arm the vast majority of the time as well.
 
Block said:
Everything I've heard thus far in the press indicates that Morency is atop the depth chart right now. There remains an outside chance that a sleeper like Noah Herron or Deshawn Wynn could emerge, but that's unlikely.
I would like a little more homer opinion on Herron. Anyone?
Noah Herron seemed like he belongs in the NFL, however at this level he's just a guy. He had some solid blocking skills but is better suited for the backup/third down role. He just doesn't impress in any one area.
From what I've heard about the Packer OTAs, Wynn has really been impressing and at 5'11' 230 he could be pretty imposing. I think he wins out the third spot ahead of Herron. I really hope they keep Wynn as a RB and don't try to convert him to FB. That would be a mistake with the speed he has. I don't think he'll ever be a starter, but I think he'll be a great #3 for the Packers.
 
Why does anyone have to win this gig? I don't know much about either guy but lots of people seem to be under the impression one of two guys will win the job and become a solid fantasy player.

It's entirely possible they will both be mediocre running backs and split time and carries.

 
Why does anyone have to win this gig? I don't know much about either guy but lots of people seem to be under the impression one of two guys will win the job and become a solid fantasy player. It's entirely possible they will both be mediocre running backs and split time and carries.
That is a pretty rare occurrence, and is unlikely in this case.
 
Block said:
Everything I've heard thus far in the press indicates that Morency is atop the depth chart right now. There remains an outside chance that a sleeper like Noah Herron or Deshawn Wynn could emerge, but that's unlikely.
I would like a little more homer opinion on Herron. Anyone?
Noah Herron seemed like he belongs in the NFL, however at this level he's just a guy. He had some solid blocking skills but is better suited for the backup/third down role. He just doesn't impress in any one area.
From what I've heard about the Packer OTAs, Wynn has really been impressing and at 5'11' 230 he could be pretty imposing. I think he wins out the third spot ahead of Herron. I really hope they keep Wynn as a RB and don't try to convert him to FB. That would be a mistake with the speed he has. I don't think he'll ever be a starter, but I think he'll be a great #3 for the Packers.
Herron is a pretty good third-down back though; he's young, can catch, and can block.If Wynn impresses the Packers could keep all 4; if he doesnt, Wynn is probably a practice squad guy.

 
Why does anyone have to win this gig? I don't know much about either guy but lots of people seem to be under the impression one of two guys will win the job and become a solid fantasy player. It's entirely possible they will both be mediocre running backs and split time and carries.
That is a pretty rare occurrence, and is unlikely in this case.
Can you support this contention? There are many recent examples of RBBC situations that have emerged because no single player has sufficient talent to justify a full-time job. Houston and Denver last year come to mind. Baltimore, Minnesota and San Francisco the year before, etc.
 
At this point I think it is Morency's job to win. Seems like he is saying and doing all the right things. Been a workout monster this off season and has shown up to all the mini camps working hard.

I have even heard him talk about how he wants to be the next A. Green. A castoff that when given a 2nd chance proves his worth. (Seattle basically dumped A. Green before he became a super star).

At this point I view Morency as a great gamble. He will for sure get his shot - what he does with it - who knows.

I own Morency is my dynasty league and I am keeping my fingers crossed that he emerges from this RBBC and become the main back. Either way I am expecting him to serve as a good #3 RB for the start of the season with a chance to become a #2 or a #4.

I can also say that I was shocked when GB did not draft Lynch and passed up on Irons and Henry then traded down - that MUST mean they were not so worried about their RB situation.
Lynch was gone (to Buffalo) @1.12 before Green Bay picked @ 1.16. Not to say they couldn't have traded up to get him.Id
Way to set him straight Mark.
Thanks for setting me straight - what I really meant to say was "I was shocked when I saw they did not end up with him " (I was in Mexico big game fishing during the NFL draft). Every predraft board I saw seemed to show Lynch going to the Packers one way or another. I was just as excited last year when the Texans passed up on Reggie Bush. I thought for sure that meant Domanick Davis was going to be healthy and that Morency would be ready if Davis had any problems. We all know how that turned out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Great thread.

It's Morency's job to lose, and Jackson missing the first full squad mini-camp (though not his fault) didn't help him in his quest to unseat the vet.

Morency had a great start in a Monday night game against the Eagles last year - except for his two fumbles. Two BIG fumbles. Then, when he fumbled the next week on the first series, he was pulled in favor of Herron, which is when Herron had his big game. I don't see Herron being anything more than a 3rd down back.

The real interesting one to watch will be Wynn. He has all the talent, he just needs to get his head out of his ### and concentrate on football. (He didn't exactly start out with a bang at mini-camp, where he tripped on his first run from scrimmage and then got hurt)

This will be a camp battle, and where you end up taking either Jackson or Morency will depend greatly on the date of your draft. I think the value play is taking Morency 1 or 2 rounds after Jackson.

 
Great thread.It's Morency's job to lose, and Jackson missing the first full squad mini-camp (though not his fault) didn't help him in his quest to unseat the vet. Morency had a great start in a Monday night game against the Eagles last year - except for his two fumbles. Two BIG fumbles. Then, when he fumbled the next week on the first series, he was pulled in favor of Herron, which is when Herron had his big game. I don't see Herron being anything more than a 3rd down back.The real interesting one to watch will be Wynn. He has all the talent, he just needs to get his head out of his ### and concentrate on football. (He didn't exactly start out with a bang at mini-camp, where he tripped on his first run from scrimmage and then got hurt)This will be a camp battle, and where you end up taking either Jackson or Morency will depend greatly on the date of your draft. I think the value play is taking Morency 1 or 2 rounds after Jackson.
I belive the odds are very low that Jackson starts the season as RB1 in Green Bay: it will be Morency. That is why they went out and got him. TT already knew it unlikely Green would be returning. I have a hard time recalling GB ever going into the season with a rookie running back as starter....
 
Why does anyone have to win this gig? I don't know much about either guy but lots of people seem to be under the impression one of two guys will win the job and become a solid fantasy player. It's entirely possible they will both be mediocre running backs and split time and carries.
That is a pretty rare occurrence, and is unlikely in this case.
Can you support this contention? There are many recent examples of RBBC situations that have emerged because no single player has sufficient talent to justify a full-time job. Houston and Denver last year come to mind. Baltimore, Minnesota and San Francisco the year before, etc.
Well, to me, a RBBC happens when there are two or more backs on a team who consistently receive carries and consistently take away carries from the other. The best example I can recall of a true RBBC is Dallas currently, with Julius Jones and Marion Barber. Both will receive significant carries in every game, and take carries away from the other.The RBBC you refer to are different. In Houston last year, for example, there were definite starters at different points during the season who were switched around due to ineffectiveness. While Lundy, Dayne, Gado, etc all received some carries and yards, they got them in clusters of games and did very little in others. This is not really RBBC.Denver last year was more of a RBBC, but the Denver RB situation is weird, honestly. I don't feel good comparing that to anything else.The main reason why I don't think this will be a RBBC is the history of good production from Packer RBs. Edgar Bennett and Dorsey Levens really weren't very good, but they both produced at a decent level in Green Bay. Ahman Green is clearly a talented guy, and he also produced. Looking at backups of recent years, Najeh Davenport, Tony Fisher, Samkon Gado, and now Morency have all produced in this offense with Favre at QB.I don't see any reason why that trend cannot continue for at least another year with Favre at the helm. My prediction is that whoever is the starter to begin the season will do well and hold on to the job, and I think that guy will most likely be Morency.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why does anyone have to win this gig? I don't know much about either guy but lots of people seem to be under the impression one of two guys will win the job and become a solid fantasy player. It's entirely possible they will both be mediocre running backs and split time and carries.
That is a pretty rare occurrence, and is unlikely in this case.
Can you support this contention? There are many recent examples of RBBC situations that have emerged because no single player has sufficient talent to justify a full-time job. Houston and Denver last year come to mind. Baltimore, Minnesota and San Francisco the year before, etc.
:thumbdown: I agree I don't see either of these guys being the man. I see each of them getting 10 - 15 touches per game tops. Oh and Herron sucks. After the Rams game in which he had 100 yards rushing he only carried the ball 13 times the rest of the entire season. Looking at the numbers he put up in that game you'd think he would have had more than that over the last 11 games but McCarthy was very critical of him, felt he was slow to the hole, picked the wrong hole and that he just left alot of yards on the field.
 
I predict Morency will get 15 to 20 carries per game.

What precedent is there at GB for the starting RB to get fewer than 15 carries per game?

 
I think most RBBC happen out of neccessity rather than by design and this is looking like that situation to me.

If Brandon Jackson had not been hurt in the early going I think there would be more compitition but losing this time in practice will hurt him in the 1st year.

I don't think any of these RBs will be a reliable option in 2007. I like Jackson better long term.

 
I will gladly take the RB with less milage, is 5 years younger, and didn't get traded away from a bad RB situation in Houston last year. Thats not even talking about talent, which may be close, but those top 3 things are not in Morency's favor.

Who win's these?

Speed is probably even between the two.

Power= Morency

Agility= I would say Jackson, but for arguments sake even.

Vision=Jackson

Hands=Jackson

NFL Exp=Morency

Ball Security=Jackson

So, why wouldn't Jackson start again?

 
I will gladly take the RB with less milage, is 5 years younger, and didn't get traded away from a bad RB situation in Houston last year. Thats not even talking about talent, which may be close, but those top 3 things are not in Morency's favor.Who win's these?Speed is probably even between the two.Power= MorencyAgility= I would say Jackson, but for arguments sake even.Vision=JacksonHands=JacksonNFL Exp=MorencyBall Security=JacksonSo, why wouldn't Jackson start again?
Agility is in Morency's favor; Jackson is a straight ahead guy. I'd also put Vision in Morency's category because of the experience he has. Ball security is probably even, as both have had fumbling problems. Hands, I agree is Jackson, but only slightly.An important thing you forgot to touch on is injury history. Jackson has had surgeries on both shoulders and has had some knee issue since being drafted. Morency had a back bruise last year and missed a game, but other than that has been healthy in college and the pros.Jackson was drafted in an area of the NFL draft where a roster spot is assured, but a major role isn't. He isn't going to be handed anything. So, since Morency is on the top of the depth chart currently and the coaches seem to have high hopes for him, why should we assume Jackson will start?
 
The job is Morency's to lose. I'm not so sure he's incapable of losing.
Jackson may be capable of winning the job (I think that would be the case if he starts, rather than Morency losing it), but he hasn't yet. That's my main point here.I don't think there is much talent disparity at all here. Morency is every bit as capable as Jackson, if not moreso.
 
I will gladly take the RB with less milage, is 5 years younger, and didn't get traded away from a bad RB situation in Houston last year. Thats not even talking about talent, which may be close, but those top 3 things are not in Morency's favor.

Who win's these?

Speed is probably even between the two.

Power= Morency

Agility= I would say Jackson, but for arguments sake even.

Vision=Jackson

Hands=Jackson

NFL Exp=Morency

Ball Security=Jackson

So, why wouldn't Jackson start again?
quick and easy translation:Benson owns bjax, so he must be the starter. End of discussion.

:thumbdown:

Id

 
Good discussion. One thing to note: Brandon Jackson played in the same scheme that the Packers employ....something to consider.

Also, for anyone interested in actually seeing both of them run, here are some useful videos

Brandon Jackson

Agree with the point that he (Jackson) may not be special, but I do think that he can be productive. In watching the highlight video, one thing that does impress me is that this guy makes decisive, sharp, cuts once he sees the opening, which is ideal for the zone-blocking scheme. Honestly, I don't think that any of the Denver RBs under Shanny have been special, yes, T.D. included, but many were productive, some very much so. Portis was probably the most talented, in that I believe he can flourish in any system, not just zone-blocking. But back to the point, I think that Jackson can have a few seasons as good as Domanick Davis and Chester Taylor, he sort of runs like each of those guys. With good vision, hands, and decision-making, I think he will be just fine if he holds up physically. My take is that Morencey initially starts, but doesn't do a whole lot, and by Weeks 4-6, Jackson will get an opportunity and do more with it than Morencey. Is he the long-term solution, maybe not, but a pretty good 2-3 year run is not out of the question, just don't expect this B.Jackson to be like another B.Jackson, as in Bo.........who would have made many of his comtemporaries an afterthought had he not gotten injured........
 
Good discussion. One thing to note: Brandon Jackson played in the same scheme that the Packers employ....something to consider.

Also, for anyone interested in actually seeing both of them run, here are some useful videos

Brandon Jackson

Nice video to watch. What sticks out to me, Brandon Jackson can't make these college guys miss completely. He has a slight cutting ability that keeps him going forward with contact every time. NFL speed is going to eat this guy up.
 
quick and easy translation:Benson owns bjax, so he must be the starter. End of discussion.
oh lord, can anyone have a discussion on this board without someone invoking the "you're only saying that because you own him" argument?Maybe Joe should add this to the "Please Read - Shark Pool Notes" thread that's pinned up top...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bloom and I just interviewed Pete Daugherty from the Green Bay Press Gazette. I started the interview with the RB question. I'll have the show edited and posted to Itunes shortly.

 
I will gladly take the RB with less milage, is 5 years younger, and didn't get traded away from a bad RB situation in Houston last year. Thats not even talking about talent, which may be close, but those top 3 things are not in Morency's favor.Who win's these?Speed is probably even between the two.Power= MorencyAgility= I would say Jackson, but for arguments sake even.Vision=JacksonHands=JacksonNFL Exp=MorencyBall Security=JacksonSo, why wouldn't Jackson start again?
You forgot this:Pass protection=?Whoever does this well will get more carries. That will be a huge factor in playing time. I would also add that your point about milege is probably irrelavent at this stage. One could argue that really mean experience in favor of Morency.
 
Good discussion. One thing to note: Brandon Jackson played in the same scheme that the Packers employ....something to consider.

Also, for anyone interested in actually seeing both of them run, here are some useful videos

Brandon Jackson

I wholeheartedly disagree. I saw something very special there - great technique and instincts. I don't think Jackson's a future hall of famer or anything, but his QB is so that's not as important.He runs with his shoulders square (ish) to the line, has good acceleration through the hole, and follows his blockers very well. He's aware of his limitations (most notably speed) and doesn't go down easy - he's willing to punish the defender.

 
Great thread.It's Morency's job to lose, and Jackson missing the first full squad mini-camp (though not his fault) didn't help him in his quest to unseat the vet. Morency had a great start in a Monday night game against the Eagles last year - except for his two fumbles. Two BIG fumbles. Then, when he fumbled the next week on the first series, he was pulled in favor of Herron, which is when Herron had his big game. I don't see Herron being anything more than a 3rd down back.The real interesting one to watch will be Wynn. He has all the talent, he just needs to get his head out of his ### and concentrate on football. (He didn't exactly start out with a bang at mini-camp, where he tripped on his first run from scrimmage and then got hurt)This will be a camp battle, and where you end up taking either Jackson or Morency will depend greatly on the date of your draft. I think the value play is taking Morency 1 or 2 rounds after Jackson.
I belive the odds are very low that Jackson starts the season as RB1 in Green Bay: it will be Morency. That is why they went out and got him. TT already knew it unlikely Green would be returning. I have a hard time recalling GB ever going into the season with a rookie running back as starter....
Brent Fullwood.
 
Good discussion. One thing to note: Brandon Jackson played in the same scheme that the Packers employ....something to consider.

Also, for anyone interested in actually seeing both of them run, here are some useful videos

Brandon Jackson

That, and he has horrible pad level on most of those runs. Talk about asking for injury in the NFL...
 
Good discussion. One thing to note: Brandon Jackson played in the same scheme that the Packers employ....something to consider.

Also, for anyone interested in actually seeing both of them run, here are some useful videos

Brandon Jackson

:goodposting: Jackson will be a starter one day, just not sure it's this season. But he has starting ability.

 
Good discussion. One thing to note: Brandon Jackson played in the same scheme that the Packers employ....something to consider.

Also, for anyone interested in actually seeing both of them run, here are some useful videos

Brandon Jackson

His pad level isn't great, but it's not bad. His worst trait right now is ball protection. He doesn't switch arms very well which makes him fumble prone. He needs to fix that.
 
I am not saying that Jackson will not start someday.

But right now is the time of year for rookie hype. Everyone is big on rookies coming into camp.

Mostly rooky RBs do not start their first year.

Morency will begin the season as starter. If Jackson tears it up and Morency keeps getting stuffed, that could change.

But I bet it does not.

 
I belive the odds are very low that Jackson starts the season as RB1 in Green Bay: it will be Morency. That is why they went out and got him. TT already knew it unlikely Green would be returning. I have a hard time recalling GB ever going into the season with a rookie running back as starter....
Brent Fullwood.
Aka Brent Fumblewood. Aaron - remember his rookie year? Pre-season game, in as a kick returner, and he takes one to the house.....wait, he fumbles as he nears the goalline....
 
I belive the odds are very low that Jackson starts the season as RB1 in Green Bay: it will be Morency. That is why they went out and got him. TT already knew it unlikely Green would be returning. I have a hard time recalling GB ever going into the season with a rookie running back as starter....
Brent Fullwood.
Aka Brent Fumblewood. Aaron - remember his rookie year? Pre-season game, in as a kick returner, and he takes one to the house.....wait, he fumbles as he nears the goalline....
How could I ever forget. His first professional game. All that promise. I was jumping up and down on our couch when it looked like he was going to score. And then...
 
Good discussion. One thing to note: Brandon Jackson played in the same scheme that the Packers employ....something to consider.

Also, for anyone interested in actually seeing both of them run, here are some useful videos

Brandon Jackson

Actually, there's one run in there where he does switch, textbook style (run wide right, switches to outside arm) but overall you're right. But it didn't seem to hurt Ahman too much when he was in his prime...
 
You forgot this: Pass protection=? Whoever does this well will get more carries. That will be a huge factor in playing time.
"Nebraska running backs coach Randy Jordan elaborated."He started out as our third-down back because we used so many backs," said Jordan. "We had a short-yardage guy, someone else who could catch passes. He could do all of those things. What separated this kid was he protected the passer."Nebraska uses the West Coast system, just like Green Bay. Nebraska's offensive line uses zone blocking, just like Green Bay. Nebraska expects its running backs to block on passing downs, to pick up the blitz and protect the quarterback, just like Green Bay."Nebraska was very focused on blocking," said Jackson. "In our system, our coaches say if you don't block you don't play. Every day we would have blocking drills maybe two times a practice. I'm no stranger to blocking."Jordan said Jackson became very comfortable running behind the zone blocking scheme as well. He averaged 5.3 yards per carry."We try to stretch the play, create lanes for the running back," said Jordan. "Brandon does it very very well. You have, really, a minimal cut, minimal decision; you put your foot on the ground and kind of find a lane."(Zone blocking) is really, really good for a back like him who's quick, decisive - he's physical. That's one thing the Packers are really going to be pleased with."Jordan said Jackson was also very coachable, working on his weaknesses."He's not going to be like a lot of players and just work on what he likes," said Jordan. "When he first got here, he didn't like pass protection, but I challenged him. 'If you want to get on the field, pass protect, show me.' He stayed after practice and worked. He watched extra film on linebackers, became a pretty good blocker."Jackson also had good hands and caught 33 passes for 313 yards, with just a couple of drops all year.With the Packers, Jackson is in a situation similar to the one in which he found himself in Lincoln. Green is gone to Houston. Vernand Morency, Noah Herron, P.J. Pope, Arliss Beach and fellow rookie draft pick DeShawn Wynn are all vying for the starting running back spot with Jackson."It's very similar," Jackson admitted. But that's all he'll say. He won't get caught up in any other names or even admit he has the opportunity here some backs wait a lifetime to get - to be the guy."I'm really not paying attention to that right now. I'm just trying to get familiar with the playbook," said Jackson. "You've got to get in to the playbook first before you can get out on the field and run these plays before you even have a chance to start."
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top