Packers RB? (1 Viewer)

[beavers]

Who's starting today?

Jackson or Wynn since Morency is out?

 

[beavers]

Anyone?

 

[JHuber77]

Jackson probably with Wynn getting GL duties and change of pace.

 

[towney]

Both will see action, looks like more going to Wynn. Muddied GB backfield for the moment....

Just heard on ESPN Wynn will not get the start but see some action.....

 

[shadyridr]

Just announced on ESPN. Wynn will not get the start.

 

[Kleck.]

Jackson, Grant and Wynn have all been in on plays. Grant with all the rushes thus far, Jackson with two catches - one was a designed RB screen.

 

[MikeyFL]

FWIW, Green Bay is now on the San Diego 16 on a 3rd and 3, and Wynn is in the game.

It looks like Jackson and Grant are getting the majority of the carries/screens, and Wynn is the red zone RB.

 

[Challenge Everything]

All week San Diego probably practiced with Wynn/Jackson as the primary back. It was great game planning by the Packers to bring in Grant as the starter right away and use each of the backs in their respective roles.

 

[[scooter]]

Wynn: 0 rushes, 1 target

Jackson: 2ushes, 3 targets

Grant: 3 rushes, 1 target

 

[sts911911]

Yeah this is definitely a running back committee, and it is only going to get uglier when Morrency finally gets in the mix...

 

[Challenge Everything]

Yeah this is definitely a running back committee, and it is only going to get uglier when Morrency finally gets in the mix...

Ugly for fantasy... great for reality.

 

[mr. furley]

crazy right now.

RBBC with no obvious roles.

 

[MikeyFL]

I'll agree with the consensus at this point. The last time GB was in the redzone, Jackson was in the game.

Plus, the Packers are using a lot of sets without a RB in the backfield.

 

[[scooter]]

Yeah this is definitely a running back committee, and it is only going to get uglier when Morrency finally gets in the mix...

Ugly for fantasy... great for reality.

RBBC with no clearly defined roles = fustercluck.When was the last time a team made the playoffs by throwing 4 RBs into the mix at random moments?

 

[Challenge Everything]

Yeah this is definitely a running back committee, and it is only going to get uglier when Morrency finally gets in the mix...

Ugly for fantasy... great for reality.

:XRBBC with no clearly defined roles = fustercluck.When was the last time a team made the playoffs by throwing 4 RBs into the mix at random moments?

What team ever had the option of rolling with 3/4 RBs? Teams use 2 consistently and win with that combo. No reason why 3 would not work just as well using their own strengths.

 

[simsarge]

Yeah this is definitely a running back committee, and it is only going to get uglier when Morrency finally gets in the mix...

Ugly for fantasy... great for reality.

RBBC with no clearly defined roles = fustercluck.When was the last time a team made the playoffs by throwing 4 RBs into the mix at random moments?

What team ever had the option of rolling with 3/4 RBs? Teams use 2 consistently and win with that combo. No reason why 3 would not work just as well using their own strengths.

Just showed the run/pass differential on screen for GB:26 Pass, 8 runs

 

[TheFanatic]

Yeah this is definitely a running back committee, and it is only going to get uglier when Morrency finally gets in the mix...

Ugly for fantasy... great for reality.

RBBC with no clearly defined roles = fustercluck.When was the last time a team made the playoffs by throwing 4 RBs into the mix at random moments?

What team ever had the option of rolling with 3/4 RBs? Teams use 2 consistently and win with that combo. No reason why 3 would not work just as well using their own strengths.

Just showed the run/pass differential on screen for GB:26 Pass, 8 runs

Looks like they are taking what SD is giving them. Other than that, this may be the ugliest RBBC I have ever seen and a healthy Morency is only going to make it worse...

 

[LordHusker]

What. A. Mess.