Kool-Aid Larry
Footballguy
of all the reputable, legit, neutral people they could have hired for this, they chose some shady firm best known for manufacturing whatever desired results you might be looking for?Does any of this matter, once the text messages come into play?I don't know who these 'you guys' are supposed to be --- I'm one person, and I referenced the los angeles times.That's what you guys are going with? I mean, I knew you would attack the source without considering the merits of the report, but I figured you would focus on them having an office in NYC and are therefore salty Jet or Giant fans.actually, this was probably a smaller job.
I'd imagine they got paid the big bucks by big tobacco to show us second hand smoke is harmless.
but I guess there are pats fans all over the world, considering how awesome they are.
According to the Los Angeles Times, "Exponent's research has come under fire from critics, including engineers, attorneys and academics who say the company tends to deliver to clients the reports they need to mount a public defense."
In 2009, the Amazon Defense Coalition criticized an Exponent study commissioned by the energy company Chevron that dumping oil waste didn't cause cancer because Chevron's largest shareholder was a director on Exponent's board. Exponent "doubted" the director knew of the study. Controversially, Exponent research argued that secondhand smoke does not cause cancer. The firm was also criticized for assisting industry efforts to reduce chromium regulation.
....
"The first thing you know is that when Exponent is brought in to help a company, that company is in big trouble,"<--- edit
no, why would that matter?
<--- edit